[ForSale-Swap] Question on tubes

[Bill Kuhn - MCSE]

I've heard some conflicting opinions on the pulse version while I was
looking to retube my Kenwood 530S. I didn't want to make a mistake so I
got 6146Ws.

To your knowledge, with the 6293 swap directly with the 6146B?

-----Original Message-----
From: AA6DX [mailto:aa6dx at pacbell.net] 
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 3:18 PM
To: Lloyd; For Sale_ Swap
Subject: Re: [ForSale-Swap] Question on tubes

>From the Internet ... 
"There is a "pulse" tube that is a very heavy duty
version of the 6146 and can be substituted without any
problems.  This is the 6293.  A 6293 will outlast a
"plain" 6146 by at least 5 times the life (over 10
times is not that unusual!).  We would "kill" back in
the late 1950s and early 1960s to get our hands on a
pair of 6293 tubes for our DX-100s, etc."
73 -- Mark, AA6DX
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lloyd" <kk7iz at cox.net>
To: "For Sale_ Swap" <forsale-swap at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2004 1:08 PM
Subject: [ForSale-Swap] Question on tubes


> Is the 6293 a sort of ruggedized 6146? 


______________________________________________________________
ForSale-Swap mailing list
 FAQ: http://mailman.qth.net/swap/swap.htm
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/forsale-swap
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/faq.htm
Post: mailto:ForSale-Swap at mailman.qth.net