[Fists] Re: on-air/online religious stuff.

[John Graf]

Would it be asking too much for those who even remotely care about this
subject to take it off line?   There are many lists where such irrelevant
debate can be conducted.  I would prefer to read only CW-related email on
this particular list.

Thanks,

John, WA6L

On Wed, Dec 31, 2008 at 10:42 AM, kc9brz <kc9brz at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Sending CC's may delay your post. If you feel that your post needs to go to
> more than one destination please send them separately.
>
>
>
> > From: Ralph Sutton zl2aoh at ihug.co.nz
> > Dave,
> > I don't think Hyram was objecting to religion being discussed on air
> > among a special interest group.  What is an issue, however
> > is bringing  up religious material in the FISTS Mailman Group  that
> > should be  entirely secular.
>
> Ralph,
>
> That makes more sense.  What pushed my button was Hyram's statement
> that someone/something "suggests" that religion not be "used"
> (discussed?) on the ham frequencies.  Granted, I don't know
> all the "generally accepted conventions" about ham operations.
> And it's been a while since I took my license exam, so I'm a bit
> rusty on official US's FCC Part 97 stuff, or ITU stuff.
>
> But I get my feathers ruffled when people make up stuff about
> either official FCC/ITU rules or put forth their own personal
> preferences as "generally accepted conventions" or "good
> operating principles."
>
> -Dave, kc9brz.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Fists mailing list
> Fists at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fists
>



-- 

Rodney Dangerfield  - "The way my luck is running, if I was a politician I
would be honest."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/fists/attachments/20081231/87ea9c39/attachment.htm