[Fists] anyone zero-beat anymore?

[Alex K.]

   I disagree with anyone who feels you shudn't at
least get "close", now to me thats 100 to 125hz. And
IF someone feels like there is more than enuff room
for everyone regardless of whether or not you are zero
beat, then you obviously haven't herd the bunches of
cw qso's spread out by 500hz to 1khz, its maddening.
And for the nets, you are "supposed" to zero beat the
net control station, apparently not many realize they
are to zero the ncs..
   I think its got a lot to do with RIT's not being
reset and left wherever they were from the last time.?
This is not a science and being exact isn't necessary
but being "close" is a requirement in my book.
   73 and good zeroing.
   Alex K5uny #3304
--- Eric Fairbank <fairbank56 at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Sending CC's may delay your post. If you feel that
> your post needs to go to more than one destination
> please send them separately. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --- w8fax at wildblue.net wrote:
> 
> 
> > I have NVER in all these years aver heard a
> > traffic or any other net where everyone is dead on
> > freq. Nor is that ever likely to happen, because
> > it  is not a requirement to do so for solid
> > copy..................Al/W8FAX
> 
>   Sorry, I shouldn't have said "exact" in my post.
> The
> point is, to make an effort to get close. I don't
> think people really realize their transmitting
> several
> hundred hertz apart from each other. In all the
> traffic nets Iv'e participated in, the NCS always
> sends QNZ as part of opening the net. As you know,
> this means for everyone to zero-beat on his signal.
> 
> Eric N3EF
> 
> 
> 
>      
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
> Never miss a thing.  Make Yahoo your home page. 
> http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
> _______________________________________________
> Fists mailing list
> Fists at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fists
>