[FedCom] FEDCOM in Rural areas
~Bill
ecps92 at earthlink.net
Sat Jun 27 16:30:22 EDT 2026
Lo/Jack VHF (173.0750) has been disbanded (March 2026) , activity from the towers will decrease as the states remove them from service
Most Federal LE (Non Military Base) activity will be Conventional, not trunked, outside of the Bureau of Prison which generally run on-site trunking for the Prison Complex
https://www.radioreference.com/db/aid/2289
Bill - N1KUG
Boston, Mass
Cruise Ship Frequencies
http://scanmaritime.com/
-----Original Message-----
From: fedcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:fedcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of lists--- via FedCom
Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2026 3:18 PM
To: ~Bill via FedCom
Subject: Re: [FedCom] FEDCOM in Rural areas
Radioreference has some users listed in your section "C" though I have
had no luck searching then for trunking activity. No control channels
found. I did find some faint Lojack.
https://www.radioreference.com/db/sid/10459
On Sat, 27 Jun 2026 12:36:26 -0400, ~Bill via FedCom
<fedcom at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
> D not knowing where you are, hard to make comments/assumptions,
> however I’ve seen rural areas that folks say there is none/has been
> none and yet when I travel, I’ve found activity.
>
>
>
> a. Have you searched ALL the Federal activity bands ?
>
> a. 138-144
>
> b. 148-150.8
>
> c. 162-174
>
> d. 380-400
>
> e. 400-420
>
> f. And let us not forget the forgotten Low Band, which still
> lives
>
>
>
>
>
> Just looking over my notes, you have multiple CBP/ICE/HSI and BP
> sites around you
>
>
>
> a. Fort Drum
>
> b. Lake Placid
>
> c. Myakka (last visit this tower no longer existed, unless
> rebuilt)
>
> d. And you have the Avon Park Bombing range
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill - N1KUG
>
> Boston, Mass
>
> Cruise Ship Frequencies
>
> <http://scanmaritime.com/> http://scanmaritime.com/
>
>
>
> From: David Todd [mailto:todddw at bellsouth.net]
> Sent: Saturday, June 27, 2026 11:34 AM
> To: ecps92 at earthlink.net
> Subject: Re: [FedCom] Is it possible?
>
>
>
> Greetings to the group, I live in a rural area since I retired, so I
> don't get much Federal traffic. I have monitored this list for a long
> time and will continue to monitor and if I hear anything in my area I
> will post it.
>
> Thank you for letting me be a part of this group.
>
>
>
> Davis W Todd
>
> Sebring, Florida.
>
>
>
> ...in God we trust
>
> all others we monitor...
>
>
>
> On Saturday, June 27, 2026 at 10:10:09 AM EDT, ~Bill via FedCom
> <fedcom at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> In our Region this has been historically $167 for the FBI primarily
> (Newark Repeater), but some simplex using $293 only (Boston FO -
> security)
>
> Nothing else till you get down to DC
>
>
>
> One/same RID changing NAC's is an odd occurrence, pointing me back to
> strong RF overload or a weak signal
>
>
>
> Bill - N1KUG
>
> Boston, Mass
>
> Cruise Ship Frequencies
>
> http://scanmaritime.com/
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> From: fedcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:fedcom-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Marcie via FedCom
>
> Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2026 6:39 PM
>
> To: Discussion of Federal Government Communications
>
> Subject: Re: [FedCom] Is it possible?
>
>
>
> Thank you..I was listening to 167.3625 and was getting all diff.
> NAC,s but
>
> same RID I just
>
> figured (misfire) both my SDS 200 and R8600 copied same thing...tks
> for
>
> input...Marcy
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 6:36 PM D Jones <djoneses at verizon.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Yes, you could have the same RID for different NACs in some type of
> >
>
> > interoperability situation. But interesting that you would hear
> > the same
>
> > radio on different systems on the same day.
>
> >
>
> > David
>
> >
>
> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2026 at 5:59 PM, Marcie via FedCom
>
> > <fedcom at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>
> > To have different NAC,s and same RID (probably no?t) but kinda odd
> > I got
>
> > different NAC,s 143, 164, 334, same RID malfunction? with radio?
>
> > Marcy
>
> > ______________________________________________________________
>
> > FedCom mailing list
>
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom
>
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>
> > Post: mailto:FedCom at mailman.qth.net
>
> >
>
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________________
>
> FedCom mailing list
>
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>
> Post: mailto:FedCom at mailman.qth.net
>
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
>
> FedCom mailing list
>
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom
>
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>
> Post: mailto:FedCom at mailman.qth.net
>
>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> FedCom mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:FedCom at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
______________________________________________________________
FedCom mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fedcom
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:FedCom at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the FedCom
mailing list