[FedCom] FedCom Digest, Vol 164, Issue 19

[Chuck]

 Bob:

Why even respond if you are going to be an elitist monitor? Your comment alienates anyone to assist you since you're trying to be elite. If you have nothing to share, just sit in the background.

Marcy:

Back in the day when I lived in NJ (pre P25), 166.325 was used by Sandy Hook and it's well documented on Google searches. That doesn't mean it's still used, but as P25 now, but it's a good start, regardless of what Bob doesn't have to help with.

More fodder:

Federal monitoring always has been about careful sharing. And I've been at it for probably more than five decades. If there's a reason I can't share something, I will never flaunt it. And the stuff I monitor goes much deeper than FedCom. But I also know who I can share what with and won't hide something as innocuous as USPP. Maybe Bob works for them or on their radios, in which case he needs to ferme la bouche.

Chuck


Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2026 20:42:20 -0400
From: Marcie <marcieforme at gmail.com>
To: Discussion of Federal Government Communications
    <fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [FedCom] 166.3125
Message-ID:
    <CAGYsMKMvt21HXPuVdZDHSFXc7b09FEw0g2LbHctM-eHGpZJ2+w at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"

I wonder why I even bother? crazy....Marcy

On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 8:38?PM Bob <dopplerbob at gmail.com> wrote:

> That's very close to the correct input freq.! But I cannot discuss inputs.
> ?
>
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2026 at 8:35?PM Marcie via FedCom <fedcom at mailman.qth.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I this the input for Sandy Hook ? I got it tonight P25 RID1  N225?
>> thanks...Marcy