[FADCA] FACTS About WL2K

[Rick Muething]

Jerry,

I am telling you simply FACTS that are true and which can be verified and
which you obviously did not make much of an attempt to get correct.

You can do whatever you want with them.  I just would appreciate that the
next time you broadcast your infinite "knowledge" it includes a bit of truth
about what you are bashing. Then your credibility might be a little higher
based on responses I have seen.

Rick KN6KB


-----Original Message-----
From: fadca-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:fadca-bounces at mailman.qth.net]
On Behalf Of Jerald A DeLong
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2010 5:52 PM
To: Florida Amateur Digital Communication Association
Cc: Rick Muething
Subject: Re: [FADCA] FACTS About WL2K

Rick,

So are you telling me 4 Internet connected email server will provide
more fault tolerance and redundancy then 50-100 individual meshed nodes
connected via Radio and the Internet that can send mail on there own.

yea, Try again...

Dedicated Windows Server machines, this scare me even more, let me guess
running M$ Exchange 2000 or 2003. I am M$ certified for M$ Exchange so I
am far from being convinced this is a bullet proof system and as stable
as Linux/Unix running SendMail or Postfix.
 
I do work with these platforms every day so I do know the difference.

My observation from WL2K presentation from the 2010 Orlando HamCations
stand correct since you agree WL2K is not the only way to send HAM
email. Then this publication should be corrected and **NOT** mislead our
HAM community.




Jerry DeLong



On Sun, 2010-02-28 at 17:25 -0500, Jerald A DeLong wrote:
> Rick,
> 
> So are you telling me 4 Internet connected email server will provide
> more fault tolerance and redundancy then 50-100 individual meshed
> nodes
> connected via Radio and the Internet that can send mail on there own.
> 
> yea, Try again...
> 
> Dedicated Windows Server machines, this scare me even more, let me
> guess
> running M$ Exchange 2000 or 2003. I am M$ certified for M$ Exchange so
> I
> am far from being convinced this is a bullet proof system and as
> stable
> as Linux/Unix running SendMail or Postfix.
>  
> I do work with these platforms every day so I do know the difference.
> 
> My observation from WL2K presentation from the 2010 Orlando HamCations
> stand correct since you agree WL2K is not the only way to send HAM
> email. Then this publication should be corrected and **NOT** mislead
> our
> HAM community.
> 
> 
> Jerry DeLong
> 
> 

______________________________________________________________
FADCA mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fadca
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:FADCA at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
Version: 9.0.733 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/2707 - Release Date: 02/28/10
02:34:00