[FADCA] Re: Telpac Gateway

[Royce, Philip]

I will be bringing back up the 145.570 here in Gainesville just an FYI ,
just waiting for EEproms to be re-done for FPAC.  Right now I have stuff
my Telpac over on 145.030 since it is the universal packet freq in FLA
it seems.




 
Alachua County Sheriff's Office
Phil Royce
Combined Communications Center
Communications Technician
352-264-6601 office
352-264-6699 fax
 

-----Original Message-----
From: fadca-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:fadca-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Hast
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 6:30 PM
To: Florida Amateur Digital Communication Association
Cc: seelyf at aol.com
Subject: Re: [FADCA] Re: Telpac Gateway

On 6/28/06, bud Thompson <budt at cfl.rr.com> wrote:
> See my bottom posting . . .
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: seelyf at aol.com
> To: budt at cfl.rr.com
> Cc: seelyf at aol.com
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 13:54
> Subject: Telpac Gateway
>
>
> Hello Bud,
>
>     Thanks to you, my understanding of WL2K has grown to the extent
that we
> are now ready to establish a Telpac Gateway at the Highlands County
EOC in
> Sebring, FL.  We have a few questions before we bring the gateway up:
>
> 1.  Do you have a recommended frequency for our location here in
central
> Florida?  Contacts with FADCA did not result in a frequency
assignment.
> Since current Florida Telpac Gateways are nonexistent in the mid 145
mhz
> range, would 145.570 (or nearby) appear to be a good choice for us?
There
> is a local packet net on 144.970 so we wanted to stay clear of that
> frequency.  Any thoughts or suggestions about choosing a frequency
would be
> welcome.
>
> 2.  May we have permission to use the N0IA Telnet server?  During our
> testing, this server has been totally reliable.
>
> 3.  Do non-WL2K stations cause any problems if they connect to the
Telpac
> station?
>
> Thanks,
> Fred Seely  AA4ME
>
> * * *
>
> Hi, Fred - Glad you are moving things along there in your area.
>
> 1.  I don't see an existing 2M LAN in your part of the state, but we
need to
> get some others on the fadca at mailman.qth.net who are closer to the
ground
> truth than I am to respond before I make a recommendation for a LAN
> frequency there.  Normally, there is an FPAC switch that supplies a 2M
LAN
> frequency for access to the network.
>
> In the absence of such - I recommend trying to work an arrangement
with the
> 144.970 'packet net' folks as that must be where anyone who is on
packet is!
> This would, hopefully, provide more packet folks an
introduction/access to
> the WL2K system rather than just going off on a frequency where no one
else
> is.
>
> 2. Freel free to use the N0IA Telnet server for your Telpac Node. . .
I
> suggest using two out of state PMBOs as your #2 and #3.
>
> 3. If a keyboarder connects to the Telpac node it just responds like a
BBS.
> The keyboarder needs to know the keybaord commands for using the
Telpac
> node- which can be learned by using the H(elp) command.  Telpac
supports
> keyboard connects, but it is terribly slow that way!  Best that users
have
> Paclink AGW or Airmail (fully automatic links) or at least have the
message
> in a file and upload/send the file once the inital TO: is set up.
>
> If you need any help in setting up terminal programs (Winpack) to make
that
> semi-automatic let me know.
>

Is he talking about the Lake Placid switch on 144.97? That would be the
nearest, it is/was a DOS box, perhaps it can be moved to Linux and the
TelPac app put on it?

-- 
Chuck Hast  -- KP4DJT --
To paraphrase my flight instructor;
"the only dumb question is the one you DID NOT ask resulting in my going
out and having to identify your bits and pieces in the midst of torn
and twisted metal."
_______________________________________________
FADCA mailing list
FADCA at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/fadca


.-=== Message Scanned by Alachua County McAfee Webshield Appliance ===-.


.-*** Message Scanned by Alachua County McAfee Webshield Appliance ***-.