[FADCA] SSIDs

[Chuck Hast]

On 12/4/05, Russell Oder <oderr at bellsouth.net> wrote:
> You will find, like Bud stated, that the ROSE switch callls and to some
> extent the X1J Node calls, often used as a SSID the frequency as the
> "network" ssid , i.e. 144.99 ssid for KF4MX is -9 with -8 being the "digi"
> call used by BBSs to connect to one another as the "digi" call, if the link
> is lost, will not try to reestablish the connection and the message sent
> from one BBS to the other whould not be left imcomplete on the recieving
> BBS - it would be retained on the sending BBS for later retrasmission.
>
> Those on the reflector that set up BBSs can comment on the use of the "digi"
> ssid if they wish.
>
> Would it be good to have standardization, yes, is it possible in all
> situations, no.  Many of the sysops of digital devices have all of the the
> ssids for their call taken up already with coordinated devices and personal
> stations for various reasons.  I have my call on:
> - a ROSE switch on 145.07 as -10,
> - on a ROSE switch on 145.11/144.51 (my reapeater) as -11,
> - on a ROSE switch on 144.93 as -6 ,
> - on a ROSE switch on  446.125 as -8,
> - on a ROSE switch on  441.150 as -4 ,
> - on a ROSE Switch on  446.550 as -9,
> - on a Telpac Gateway on 144.93 as -3
> - on a Telpac Gateway on 444.700 also -4 (the two -4 devices don't see each
> other but soon will be changed as they will be direct connects from the same
> FPAC switch to two separate Telpac Gateways),
> - on my Paclink lap top, as -2, and,
> not to forget -0 which I use on Airmail on HF.
>
> So you see, with some changes being written to be submitted for coordination
> updates and changes in the database, some of us have difficulty with the
> limited number of SSIDs that the TAPR2 TNCs will accept.
>
> I think Bud has a similar problem and has approached with some additional
> resources to which he has access.
>
> Russ
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "bud Thompson" <budt at cfl.rr.com>
> To: "Florida Amateur Digital Communication Association"
> <fadca at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 9:56 AM
> Subject: Re: [FADCA] SSIDs
>
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: <Aa4mi at aol.com>
> > To: <fadca at mailman.qth.net>
> > Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 08:44
> > Subject: [FADCA] SSIDs
> >
> >
> >> To FADCA Technical Committee,
> >>
> >> I have a very simple question:
> >>
> >> What Secondary Station IDs(SSID) does FADCA either recommend or
> >>
> >> request be used for each station's function within Florida?
> >>
> >>
> >> Please provide a function/use for each:
> >>
> >> -1
> >> -2
> >> -3
> >> -4
> >> -5
> >> -6
> >> -7
> >> -8
> >> -9
> >> -10
> >> -11
> >> and any  others.
> >>
> >>
> >> My reasons for asking are twofold:
> >>
> >> My personal:
> >>
> >> 1. I am planning to put APRS in each of my 2 vehicles.
> >>
> >> 2. I am planning to put APRS in my QTH. (Yes, I know it doesn't  move.)
> >>
> >> 3. I am planning an APRS WX reporting site.
> >>
> >> 4. I may want to put an APRS in my hiking backpack or on my boat.
> >>
> >> 5. Eventually APRN may become a functional mode in Florida.
> >>
> >>
> >> Second, for all packet users:
> >>
> >> 1. When I look at a FADCA network plan or APRS map and see a SSID, I
> >> should
> >> be able immediately (at least in Florida) to know what the specific SSID
> >> indicates.
> >>
> >> 2. Since professional/Official weather sources have predicted that for
> >> the
> >> next 10 to 20 years, Florida will have substantial quantities and
> >> intensities
> >> of  hurricanes, we must all be "singing from the same sheet of music".
> >>
> >> 3. And lastly, since we are a prime tourist area, visiting as well new
> >> permanent hams should be easily incorporated to use and/or be be able to
> >> establish
> >> thir own SSIDs without conflict to a FADCA recommended state  standard.
> >>
> >>
> >> Final thought:
> >>
> >> If there is no FADCA state standard, why not?
> >>
> >> I would be willing to volunteer to help establish a standard. (Now
> >> there's
> >> an offer you
> >> don't hear often.) Yes, I know this would be difficult to accomplish
> >> since
> >> we already have established SSIDs that stations have been using.  And,
> >> yes,  I
> >> already "know" the comment that "we shouldn't go changing things because
> >> many
> >> stations already now that such-and-such SSID means "this-or-that" and/or
> >> "we've  been using it for years".
> >>
> >> See, I told you in the beginning I had a "simple question".  Now  what's
> >> the
> >> simple answer?  And, no, I don't want a long drawn out  blah-blah,blah
> >> one.
> >>
> >> Thank you.
> >>
> >>
> >> Always working toward a betterment of ham radio for 50 years as a
> >> licensed
> >> ham,
> >> with kindest regards,
> >> 73,
> >> Carl,AA4MI
> >> e-mail: _aa4mi at arrl.net_ (mailto:aa4mi at arrl.net)
> >
> > * * *
> >
> > It is likely there are APRS standards for what you need - FADCA does not
> > coordinate APRS other than to not make assignments on APRS frequencies.
> >
> > For EMCOMMs WL2K purposes:
> >
> > -10 has been generally adopted nationally for Telpac Nodes
> > -2 is what I've been recommending locally/FL for Paclink AGW ssid.
> > However, Paclink AGW will not respond to an incoming connect request so
> > there is nothing sacrosanct about -2.
> >
> > For Layered Packet Networking:
> > We use 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, and 9 for DOS FPAC(and more perhaps for
> > LINUX FPAC),  but that only affects the owner of the ham call used for the
> > FPAC switch and on the FPAC LAN frequency.   On the only ROSE switch I
> > manage 4/5 are used on the LAN.  This in no way keeps someone else from
> > using those SSIDs on any frequency.
> >
> > -14 and -15 are tricky if there are TheNet, X1-J, etc nodes in the path as
> > some of those actually change the SSID of the station going through.
> > Still not a deal breaker for their use.
> >

I know that many of these things have changed over the years, back when
we used ROSE switches we used every calll and SSID in order to handle all
of the ports in the stack. Under FPAC the ports are handled by address so
there are really only two calls that need to be clearly understood, they are
the call used to connect TO the switch in order to issue commands to it or
"node hop" and the call which allows you to do a point to point connect through
the network using the X.121 address of the distant switch. I was of the
understanding that we had sort of tried to settle on call-8 for the node call
and call-9 for the switch/x.121 connect call.

So on the kp4djt switch the node call is
kp4djt-8
and the switch/x.121 call is
kp4djt-9

I have changed the Tampa switches to reflect accordingly as we used to
use the primary call as the NODE call with the -9 call as the switch call.

Also call-10 as I understood it was to be reserved for TelPac.  I have set
up the telpac app on my switch as
kp4djt-10.

Beyond that I am not sure what else that there is. On the switches here in
the Tampa area SSID's are used as quick connect calls to local BBS and
other facilities, so all you do is issue a connect to call-n where 'n' is
assigned in the switch as a quck connect to a facility local or remote.

With the advent of the Linux FPAC switches we are no longer limited to the
first 6 SSID's of the switch call, it allows all 15 of them, and on top of that
it allows for aliases, so to give a example a connect to TELPAC on the
145.030 port will give you a connection to the TelPac app on the switch.


--
Chuck Hast
To paraphrase my flight instructor;
"the only dumb question is the one you DID NOT ask resulting in my going
out and having to identify your bits and pieces in the midst of torn
and twisted metal."