[FADCA] Moving Forward With EMCOMMs Messaging

[bud thompson]

Errata in my previous note:

2. There are very few hams who are presently involved in vhf packet
operations for any reason other than APRS (which is not a system for
exchanging large data/messages.)  There are even fewer who are invovled in
support of ARES/NTS.

This should read

2. There are very few hams who are presently involved in vhf packet
operations for any reason other than APRS (which is not a system for
exchanging large data/messages.)  There are even fewer who are invovled in
packet to support ARES/NTS.

There are some other fat finger errors, but you'll be able to see those and
make proper sense!

bud