[ETO_Alpha] 3CPX800A7

Jan C. Robbins [email protected]
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:47:09 -0600


The 3CPX performs better than the 3CX in this as in almost all other
respects.  It was, after all, "optimized" in every way the 3CX was, and
then made a considerably better tube.  73 to all!  Jan N0JR

Alex Gartshore wrote:

> I would be interested to hear of the difference in
> intermodulation distortion products between these two tubes
> before sticking them in the Alpha 89.
>
> the 3CXP800 is not optimised for linearity.....is it?
>
> I don't want to end up with an Alpha that performs like a shag
> brand amp.
>
> Any knowledge out there???
>
> Alex GD3UMW/GD6IA
>
> _______________________________________________
> ETO_Alpha mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/eto_alpha

--
"There is no end to what you can accomplish
if you don't care who gets the credit."