[Elecraft] Origin of Signal-Fine Structures in SSB Pass Band Waterfall, mainly 80/40m

Dave New, N8SBE n8sbe at densbe.com
Sun Jan 7 13:42:43 EST 2024


Andy,

You may wish to subscribe to this Google group:

hamsci at googlegroups.com

and pose your questions there.  There are a lot of folks on that list 
that are interested in scientific investigations into radio propagation 
anomalies.

73,
-- Dave, N8SBE

On 2024-01-06 14:29, Andy via Elecraft wrote:
> Hi Chris,
> 
> Many thanks for your interesting EMI focused response.
> I had already some experts indicating this possibility of potential EMI 
> origin....but no...
> 
> Yes, I agree EMI is a tricky issue as per 
> standards/regulations/politics/ and technology.
> In some areas it is not main stream interest of some industries to 
> avoid disturbance/interference  in HF.-Spectrum.
> I am an EMC professional since 40 years..
> 
> EMI/RFI/EMC I can rule out because:
> 
> 1.) The effect was also seen recently by a German HAM in a very quiet 
> QTH
> 2.) I checked the radios (all RX ok on Dummy Load),. The effect it is 
> not only visible on K3S P3 , but also on FTDX101MP, and direct front 
> end sampling SDR RX Perseus.
> 3.) I took my mobile HF car setup and operated RX from separated 
> battery, in very quiet location , and I could once see this propagation 
> effect.
> 
> So the propagation questions remain.
> 
> Questions:
> 1.	Is this an indication of Multi-Path Reception? May be with different 
> propagation modes at that time over certain distances possible?
> 2.	Is this therefore, e.g., based on delay times (phase/arrival time 
> differences) of reflections from different ionospheric layers ( e.g. 
> f1, f2 etc.) ?
> 3.	Is this based on quasi simultaneous occurrences of skywave, NVIS and 
> may be even groundwave mode ?
> 4.) 	I observed this “ shift effect” also sometimes for OTH-Radar (real 
> or faked, yes some are faked, see my qrz.com under DQRM) signals 
> recently on 40m, in  EU late afternoon , night time here.
> 
> 
> Tnx, Cu, vy 73 de Andy
> HB9CVQ, DK2VQ, AK4IG
> 
> https://www.qrz.com/db/HB9CVQ
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net 
> <elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net> On Behalf Of Chris
> Sent: Saturday, January 6, 2024 6:54 PM
> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Origin of Signal-Fine Structures in SSB Pass 
> Band Waterfall, mainly 80/40m
> 
> Hello Andy:
> 
> I will offer some experience and opinion....
> 
> Your note implies that the interference is coming from the ionosphere, 
> and you may be correct, but it is also worth considering that you may 
> be looking at digital-based interference from local devices (in 
> addition to possible distant signals coming from afar).
> 
> Digital signals (square waves, waveforms with sharp edges) have very 
> high spectral content (_many_ harmonics), so you may see many lines at 
> constant frequency spacing all over the HF spectrum and beyond.
> Switching power supplies (inside electronic devices, wall-warts, etc), 
> and digital signals from monitors, computers, routers, coffee makers, 
> washing machines, (seems everything that plugs in these days has 
> microprocessors), LED lighting, etc. can all cause interference like 
> this.
> 
> These sources may also shift or drift (slowly shift) due to changes in 
> temperature or operating (power supply/load) conditions in the digital 
> devices.
> 
> In my experience the root causes of this kind of RFI are usually the 
> digital devices, and possibly poor design for attenuation of the 
> harmonics resulting from the oscillators generating the broadband 
> interference lines. Not all oscillators are crystal based BTW, so they 
> may have significant change in frequency over short or longer time 
> spans. L-C and R-C circuits are just drifty.
> 
> BTW, I would also try to see if the lines are from within the radio. 
> Put the radio on a dummy load and look at the spectrum. If it is clean, 
> then you can probably eliminate the problem as being internal (either 
> hardware or signal processing software). Knowing Elecraft, I suspect 
> that the problem will NOT be inside the radio, but it is a place to 
> start.
> 
> The solution to external RFI _should _be in the design phase of these 
> devices. Design should include "right at the source"  shielding of high 
> frequency oscillators, power supplies and digital circuits which should 
> use circuit layout which shields clock and data circuits with ground 
> lines right in the PC board. If you let the signals escape the board, 
> you now have to add ferrites and shielding on the wires leading to 
> peripheral devices. It is far better to prevent the emissions at the 
> source. But it seems to be cheaper to some manufacturers to ignore the 
> problems and trust that your RFI generating device will escape scrutiny 
> of regulators.
> 
> Devices using high frequency signals are required by the FCC to be 
> inspected and to have limits on their emissions. In practice it seems 
> many devices, perhaps especially from overseas, have somehow eluded 
> these certifications and can become real "firestorms" of RFI. Here in 
> Colorado we have experience with grow-light power supplies that have 
> strong emissions for miles around some "greenhouses" nearly wiping out 
> the HF spectrum. In my own home, when I had ADSL/VDSL internet-phone 
> service, I was able to show service technician the spectrum emitted by 
> his cable coming into the house. He confirmed that those are the 
> frequencies his equipment used, and when I pointed out that those 
> signals become interference if they do not _stay_ inside his cable, he 
> replaced the feed cable from the pedestal to my house.
> 
> This should be of special interest to hams, who are still attempting to 
> communicate using the HF spectrum, though the emissions can still be 
> strong way up into VHF and even UHF bands. A local parking lot with 
> solar-powered lighting generates signals every 15 KHz right up to high 
> VHF. I suspect that the solar panels use MPPT switching chargers to 
> power their batteries.
> 
> Perhaps clubs should consider forming RFI committees to investigate 
> this interference and try to identify sources, maybe even by 
> manufacturer/model number. It is difficult to know when a device 
> exceeds the FCC limits for emission without a measurement lab. Maybe 
> the effort would include getting the ARRL to either build such a lab or 
> fund tests on apparently noisy consumer devices (?).
> 
> This has been a slowly growing problem for decades now, and in suburban 
> areas HF spectrum can become almost unusable, with so many houses with 
> computers, TVs, video cameras, and appliances emitting at low levels 
> and adding up to make noise well over S9 at locations of which I am 
> aware.
> No wonder so many hams are using remote stations - perhaps their home 
> stations are almost unusable due to RFI.
> 
> To troubleshoot, I would recommend powering your radio on a battery and 
> then turning off all house power and looking again at the spectrum. If 
> it has significantly reduced interference, that source is in the house, 
> and if _not_ reduced, it is external (neighborhood or atmospheric).
> Troubleshoot the house by turning on rooms one at a time to see where 
> it is coming from. Then plug/unplug devices one at a time to see if you 
> can find a single device as a major contributor. If you do this, be 
> aware that some appliances, notably refrigerators and  A/C units may 
> need to be off for a minute or two to allow the pressurized system to 
> relax before power is again applied. Also note that some digital 
> devices like internet routers may take 2 minutes or so to become fully 
> operational after power is again applied.
> 
> RFI is a difficult problem to diagnose, and it seems to me that it is 
> receiving very little attention from regulators. Cheap appliances are 
> popular and convenient but some may have bad effects on our spectrum.
> Cutting corners in design affects spectrum users, and having dozens of 
> devices in every home adds up...
> 
> 73,
> 
> Chris K0PF
> 
> 
> 
> On 1/6/2024 6:33 AM, Andy via Elecraft wrote:
>> I have a general question to better understand analysis of SSB ( RX
>> Pass
>> Band) signals displayed as waterfall, mainly on RX of night
>> time/evening low bands (80m/40m) propagation.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> (Sorry up to now no waterfall screenshots available yet. Anomality is
>> only sometimes occurring, but not very short lived.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Waterfall:
>> 
>> The horizontal axis is frequency , the vertical axis is time and the
>> brightness corresponds to signal amplitude received via any
>> propagation mode (Skywave/NVIS/Groundwave, or mixtures)
>> 
>> Modulation/ splatter become visible.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> The propagation effect I try to understand does not always occur.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> It is a "specially (modulated) signal pattern" , a vertical waterfall
>> signal fine structure with periodic signal amplitude (brightness)
>> minima and maxima lines.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> These lines are sometimes in SSB just straight down vertically with
>> ca. 300 to ca. 400 Hz intervals (6 periods) .
>> 
>> Digital signals seem to have more lines in RX Pass Band on the 
>> waterfall.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Sometimes in the RX  Pass Band these minima/maxima (QSB) lines are
>> shifted right ( QRG >)
>> 
>> Or at later observation times also may be left shifted (QRG<).
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I can rule out EMI of broad/narrow band nature. It must be due to
>> propagation of the very observed signal
>> 
>> Sometimes signature appears as " distributed cloud islands" in the
>> vertical SSB PB waterfall band
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> I observe for TX SSB Mode (e.g., 2.7kHz BW) in the RX waterfall 
>> display :
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 1.	About 6 Periodic, straight vertical lines (periodic signal 
>> amplitude
>> minima, which are darker), --normal propagation
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 2.	About 6 Periodic, right shifted ( staring low f to higher f)
>> vertical lines (signal amplitude minima) , --special propagation mode?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 3.	About 6 Periodic right shifted ( staring high f to lower f) 
>> vertical
>> lines (signal amplitude minima) , -- special propagation mode?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 4.	The angle to the vertical axis seems to change often over time.
>> Probably  according to HF Condx/Propagation?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 5.	It seems to be independent of TX LSB or USB mode.
>> 6.	Digital signals have often more vertical lines
>> 7.	The angle to the vertical axis seems to change often over time,
>> according to HF Condx/Propagation.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 8.	I have observed this effect also on day on 80m night time on a KIWI
>> SDR only 12km away in hilly HB9 ( combination of NVIS/ groundwave?)
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Questions:
>> 
>> 1.	Is this an indication of Multi-Path Reception? May be with 
>> different
>> propagation modes at that time over certain distances possible?
>> 2.	Is this therefore, e.g., based on delay times (phase/arrival time
>> differences) of reflections from different ionospheric layers ( e.g.
>> f1, f2
>> etc.) ?
>> 3.	Is this based on quasi simultaneous occurrences of skywave, NVIS 
>> and
>> may be even groundwave mode ?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Any comments or reporting of similar observations are greatly 
>> appreciated.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> PS:
>> 
>> I observed this " shift effect" also sometimes for OTH-Radar (real or
>> faked, yes some are faked, see my qrz.com under DQRM) signals recently
>> on 40m, in EU late afternoon , night time here.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Tnx, Cu, vy 73 de Andy
>> 
>> HB9CVQ, DK2VQ, AK4IG
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>   <https://www.qrz.com/db/HB9CVQ>  https://www.qrz.com/db/HB9CVQ
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home:http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help:http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post:mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>> 
>> This list hosted by:http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email
>> list:http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered towd5ibs at frii.com
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 
> Message delivered to hb9cvq at hispeed.ch
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to n8sbe at densbe.com


More information about the Elecraft mailing list