[Elecraft] Checking out Elecraft on ChatGPT

[Dave (NK7Z)]

The AI has determined that it is the humans duty to get used to the far 
more efficient method of writing, by the removal of spaces...

Saves time, saves space, and best of all saves CPU cycles...  You stupid 
humans need to realize that...  Oh wait...  Never mind, how can I help you?

73,
Dave,
https://www.nk7z.net
On 2/17/23 11:48, Dave New, N8SBE wrote:
> Alan,
> 
> For starters where are all the spaces? :-)  Makes it hard to read, 
> that's for sure.
> 
> There are so many errors:
> 1) The K3 might be considered an HF/VHF receiver, is you count 6M as 
> VHF.  Also, you can add an internal 2M transverter, but that's optional.
> 2) The K3 has 'up to' 100W.  Not sure if that's a reference to the 
> continuously-variable output power, or the fact that the base K3 is a 
> 10W (12W?) rig.
> 3) The dual-channel receiver for the K3 is an option.
> 4) One roofing filter is required for the K3.  More (up to 5 per 
> receiver) are optional.
> 5) The ATU is optional for the K3.
> 6) Remote control for the K3 is not a built-in option.  Are they taking 
> about the K3/0?
> 7) The CW decoder for the K3 comes standard, and is not an option.
> 8) The K4 (AFAIK) is not a UHF radio (see 1, above).  I don't think a 
> UHF internal transverter option has been announced (but it would be nice)?
> 9) 200W for the K4?  I wish.
> 10) The K4D has dual 'spectral' (to steal a phrase from Flex) units, but 
> that's an option.
> 11) The K4HD has roofing filters, not the base K4 or K4D.
> 12) The ATU is also optional for the K4.
> 13) The optional remote control for the K4 is not built-in, and so far, 
> not available.  Could they be talking about the K4/0?
> 
> 73,
> -- Dave, N8SBE
> 
> On 2023-02-17 13:16, Alan Bloom wrote:
>> The latest fad in AI (Artificial Intelligence) is ChatGPT, now
>> supported on Google and other platforms.  I think of it as a "super
>> Google" where you can ask questions and get detailed answers.  Just
>> for grins I entered the following request with the following answer.
>> The response "sounds" very authoritative, but see if you can spot all
>> the errors. :=)
>>
>> Alan N1AL
>>
>> CompareanElecraftK3withanElecraftK4.
>>
>> TheElecraftK3andElecraftK4arebothhigh-endAmateurRadiotransceiversdesignedforperformingradiooperationsinboththeHFandVHF/UHFbands.TheK3isthepredecessortotheK4,butbothmodelsoffertop-of-the-lineperformancefortheirrespectiveclasses.
>>
>> TheK3isanHF/VHFtransceiverthatoffersupto100wattsofpoweroutput.Itfeaturesadual-channelreceiver,anoptionalroofingfilter,andabuilt-inantennatuner.Itisamodulardesign,allowinguserstocustomizetheirsetupwithadditionalmodules,suchasadigitalvoicerecorder,remotecontrol,andCWdecoder.
>>
>> TheK4isanHF/VHF/UHFtransceiverthatoffersupto200wattsofpoweroutput.Itfeaturesadual-channelreceiver,roofingfilters,andanintegratedantennatuner.Italsoincludesabuilt-indigitalvoicerecorderandaCWdecoder.Italsosupportsanoptionalremotecontrol.
>>
>> Intermsofperformance,theK4isthesuperiorofthetwomodels,asitprovidesmorepoweroutput,abroaderrangeoffrequencies,andadditionalfeatures.However,theK3isstillacapabletransceiver,anddependingontheuser’sneeds,itmaybethebetteroption.
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to n8sbe at densbe.com
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to dave at nk7z.net