[Elecraft] Elecraft K4 Vs. Flex 6400
Nate Bargmann
n0nb at n0nb.us
Mon Mar 7 20:44:34 EST 2022
* On 2022 07 Mar 18:18 -0600, Mike Fatchett wrote:
> On 3/7/2022 4:17 PM, Bob McGraw wrote:
> > As I read the numbers the FT-DX101D is not necessarily the top radio.
> > Here's why:
> >
> > Noise Floor ---- FT-DX101D -127 dBm Elecraft K3S -135
> > dBm FLEX 6700 -118 dBm
> >
> > Sensitivity ---- FT-DX101D .60 uV Elecraft K3S .27
> > uV FLEX 6700 2.0 uV
>
> and do those numbers mean the difference in working a station or not?
I think that when one considers the Noise floor, and the sensitivity of
the three, those with a low noise location will notice the difference.
Another specification I considered was ultimate filter rejection. After
having experienced filter blow-by, it is one of my top considerations.
I can't say that I have a superior location nor antenna setup, but I
routinely hear net control stations saying that someone just faded away
when I don't observe that kind of QSB here with the K3. As I hear such
comments from NCSs in Kansas and Nebraska, it seems to be more than just
one operator making such comments. I can't imagine the ionosphere is
more stable to this location than everywhere else.
73, Nate
--
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true."
Web: https://www.n0nb.us
Projects: https://github.com/N0NB
GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list