[Elecraft] Elecraft K4 Vs. Flex 6400

Nate Bargmann n0nb at n0nb.us
Mon Mar 7 20:44:34 EST 2022


* On 2022 07 Mar 18:18 -0600, Mike Fatchett wrote:
> On 3/7/2022 4:17 PM, Bob McGraw wrote:
> > As I read the numbers the FT-DX101D is not necessarily the top radio.
> > Here's why:
> > 
> > Noise Floor ----        FT-DX101D -127 dBm     Elecraft K3S  -135
> > dBm      FLEX 6700  -118 dBm
> > 
> > Sensitivity ----         FT-DX101D .60 uV         Elecraft K3S .27
> > uV              FLEX 6700  2.0 uV
>
> and do those numbers mean the difference in working a station or not?

I think that when one considers the Noise floor, and the sensitivity of
the three, those with a low noise location will notice the difference.

Another specification I considered was ultimate filter rejection.  After
having experienced filter blow-by, it is one of my top considerations.

I can't say that I have a superior location nor antenna setup, but I
routinely hear net control stations saying that someone just faded away
when I don't observe that kind of QSB here with the K3.  As I hear such
comments from NCSs in Kansas and Nebraska, it seems to be more than just
one operator making such comments.  I can't imagine the ionosphere is
more stable to this location than everywhere else.

73, Nate

-- 
"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all
possible worlds.  The pessimist fears this is true."
Web: https://www.n0nb.us
Projects: https://github.com/N0NB
GPG fingerprint: 82D6 4F6B 0E67 CD41 F689 BBA6 FB2C 5130 D55A 8819



More information about the Elecraft mailing list