[Elecraft] OT: KWM-380
James F. Boehner, MD
jboehner01 at yahoo.com
Sun Apr 3 10:53:03 EDT 2022
I'm sorry you had so much trouble with your KWM-380. My experience is quite
the opposite. I did send mine to be completely refurbished and calibrated
and it is easily the quality of my KWM-2A and more. Techs who work on the
KWM-380 are listed on the Collins Collectors Association website. I used
Bob Struk KX6K.
Sorry about the off-topic post.
'73 de JIM N2ZZ
-----Original Message-----
From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net <elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net> On
Behalf Of Bill Tippett
Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2022 6:12 AM
To: Elecraft Reflector <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: [Elecraft] KWM-380 (was K4 and Delivery Delays)
W0YK wrote:
The KWM-380 may have been a "hot radio" in some people's minds, but I can
personally attest to the opposite. I have one, along with a number of
KWM-2As and S-Lines. The 380 is a horrible performer. The receiver is
incredibly noisy, obstructing reception of all but the loudest signals.
The audio is distorted and filtering is poor. Collins' last hurrah was a
dud.
Hi Ed,
I don't recall ever telling you this but your 380 also had horrible TX phase
noise. In the early 80s, we were located within 5 miles of each other in CO,
both running amps. Whenever you transmitted on 80 or 160, the phase noise
would cover the entire CW bands. I don't recall what you replaced the
380 with but I was a very happy camper when you did!
I take pride that my KSYN3A-updated K3 is still one of the cleanest CW
signals on the bands.
73, Bill W4ZV (ex-W0ZV)
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to jboehner01 at yahoo.com
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list