[Elecraft] K4 on AM

David Gilbert xdavid at cis-broadband.com
Mon Mar 2 16:23:25 EST 2020


Well, when a minority few seem to think that they should be special 
enough to use far more bandwidth than the rest of us do, then I'd say 
the horse isn't dead yet.  If everyone ran AM that wide that the bands 
would sound horrible.  If that isn't a good enough definition of 
presumed entitlement I don't know what is.

Why Elecraft is willing to enable people to use 10 KHz of bandwidth for 
no good communication reason is beyond me.  It would certainly make me 
think thrice about supporting a K4.

And Joe didn't bring up the subject ... you and W2XJ did.

Dave   AB7E



On 3/2/2020 1:13 PM, Grant Youngman wrote:
> smh … :-(
>
> Why did I know this would happen?  Do we really have to keep beating this same tired horse? Really?
>
> Grant NQ5T
>
>> On Mar 2, 2020, at 3:06 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists at subich.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2020-03-02 11:34 AM, Grant Youngman wrote:
>>> A maximum around 6 KHz would be better,
>> Audio response greater than 3 KHz is *never* appropriate for
>> amateur radio.  Amateur radio is, after all, a communications
>> service not an entertainment medium.
>>
>> As a certain FCC official said in a hamfest forum a few  years
>> ago, "if you want more than 3 KHz, get a *BROADCAST* license."
>>
>> 73,
>>
>>    ... Joe, W4TV
>>
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to xdavid at cis-broadband.com



More information about the Elecraft mailing list