[Elecraft] K3(s) main oscillator calibration
Wes
wes_n7ws at triconet.org
Sun Jun 7 14:32:41 EDT 2020
If you look at my earlier message in this thread, you'll see the link to nabble
and my post from 11 years ago where I describe this method. :-)
Wes N7WS
On 6/7/2020 6:03 AM, Randy Farmer wrote:
> The best way I've found to calibrate the K3 reference oscillator is to use the
> 500 Hz and 600 Hz audio tones transmitted by WWV. I put the line out audio
> through a sound card and look at it with SpectrumLab. Tune in WWV in USB or
> LSB mode and tweak the reference trim until the tones are correct when you
> switch sidebands with the dial at precisely XX.000 000 MHz. I've found that
> you can't get precise agreement between sidebands, probably because of
> quantization limits in the synthesizer, but it will certainly be less than a
> couple of Hertz. This is plenty accurate for amateur (or probably any other
> kind) of service.
>
> 73...
> Randy, W8FN
>
> On 6/6/2020 10:20 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote:
>> From my take, it is "ham radio" therefore +/-1 Hz. should be good enough for
>> most operations. After all, the K3S resolution is 1 Hz., +/-1 count as I see
>> it. I can keep mine +/-2 or 3 Hz on most bands.
>>
>> I use WWV with the radio in CW mode and CWT on, tune close to WWV and press
>> SPOT. If it settles on the WWV frequency that's good. If it is off a few
>> Hz, then I tweak the REF CAL up or down a few Hz until I get the accuracy I
>> wish by repeating the process several times. Still I find +/- 1 Hz is about
>> it, even with the high stability TXCO and very adequate warm-up time of about
>> 2 hrs.
>>
>> If one needs something more accurate, then Don is correct, test equipment is
>> the way to go. And expect to spend big bucks for good quality equipment that
>> IS traceable to NIST. If the NIST document or calibration is more than 1
>> year old, the results will be questionable.
>>
>> I wrote an article which was published in QST, Sept 2015. It deals with
>> "Transmit and Receive On Frequency". It shows that digital readouts are just
>> that, readouts, and they are not frequency determining or measuring
>> circuits. And when it is accurate on one band it may not have the same
>> accuracy on another band.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Bob, K4TAX
>>
>>
>> On 6/6/2020 5:20 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote:
>>> With the main K3 fine tuning at 1 Hz steps, I don't know that 0.1Hz or even
>>> 0.25Hz doppler shift will matter much in the final result.
>>>
>>> My frequency counter is good to 10 exp-9 which equates to +/-0.1 Hz at the
>>> TCXO frequency, so the WWV method provides as good or better accuracy, even
>>> considering the doppler shift possibility.
>>>
>>> The main problem is chasing the beat note down to a stable solid note. You
>>> usually can't truly get there, but you can get close enough that you hear
>>> about 10 or 20 seconds between peaks. Close enough for me.
>>>
>>> It can be quite expensive to obtain stability better than the K3S in an
>>> analog oscillator. My HP8640B signal generator will do that, but it takes
>>> at least a 3 hour warmup before it becomes stable. Yes, all the internal
>>> enclosures in my '8640 have covers with all the screws installed - that
>>> helps. OK, that is 'old iron', but I am not going to spend several $10,000
>>> for something better. I have better things to do with my money, and no
>>> longer have access to modern lab quality equipment to achieve that kind of
>>> stability.
>>>
>>> We have a ham band transceiver - not a precision lab instrument. As long as
>>> we can stay inside our ham bands, that is all that matters to me. I would
>>> not put a carrier exactly on 7,000.00 kHz with any transceiver.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Don W3FPR
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to wes_n7ws at triconet.org
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list