[Elecraft] Ice on dipole under snow under ice

[David Haines]

Fortunately the wire is caught under snow and ice on a timber frame 
building with asphalt shingles.  It seems to be working just fine. Even 
better than before, the dipole no longer can swing in the wind!
Maybe the next antenna should just lie on the roof!

I really appreciate "Instead of "shouldn't work," ask "what's the 
probability that it will work?"  Spoken like a true engineer who knows 
how to solve problems!

david
KC1DNY in Maine, awaiting another snow storm to put 7 more inches of 
protection on my dipole.

On 12/15/2020 2:23 PM, Fred Jensen wrote:
> Snow and/or natural ice that fell from the sky is barely conductive if 
> at all and likely has zero effect.  All or part of your antenna laying 
> on the ground will sure lower it's radiating efficiency [although 
> maybe not as much as you might think], but HF radio is sometimes 
> magic.  Like quantum mechanics, it's all probabilities. Instead of 
> "shouldn't work," ask "what's the probability that it will work?" 😁
>
> 73,
>
> Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW
> Sparks NV DM09dn
> Washoe County
>
> On 12/15/2020 9:45 AM, David Haines wrote:
>> Update:
>>
>> With one-quarter of one leg of the dipole still under ice, I got a 
>> reception report from PSKReporter on FT8 with 2 watts to Italy. That 
>> shouldn't work, should it?  Maybe the ice doesn't matter?
>>
>> KD5VXH recalled a discussion in QST on this very subject, where 400W 
>> AM melted the ice on one leg of the dipole (fed by coax), but not the 
>> other.
>> '
>> You can follow the controversy in May and July 1960 letters in QST!
>>
>> david
>> KC1DNY
>>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to dhaines at bates.edu