From markmusick at outlook.com Mon Apr 1 06:18:53 2019 From: markmusick at outlook.com (Mark Musick) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 10:18:53 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Possibly dumb question In-Reply-To: <013501d4e83d$7dbceed0$7936cc70$@gmail.com> References: <013501d4e83d$7dbceed0$7936cc70$@gmail.com> Message-ID: I contacted Win4K3Suite support and Tom, VA2FSQ says it should work as Jim, N7US and I described, but make sure both radios have the same firmware version. 73, Mark, WB9CIF -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of B. Sent: Monday, April 1, 2019 03:46 To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Possibly dumb question Hi Folks, Thanks to all for the response to my question. While I do not intend to upload the configuration of one K3 to another, I do want to have the MENU and CONFIG information pulled from the radio. It appears that Win4K3suite will do this and I have downloaded the 30 day free trial version to play with and will go from there. Thanks again for the great information. This is a great list for the best radio I have ever owned. 73, Bob AD7Z ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From hms4 at lehigh.edu Mon Apr 1 06:45:01 2019 From: hms4 at lehigh.edu (Howard Sherer) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 06:45:01 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] FS RRC 1258 Mk II Elecraft twin set up with all cables Message-ID: For Sale RRC 1258 MKII Elecraft twin set with cables. Everything works great $500. The Elecraft RRK0CBL cable is included Howard Sherer AE3T From jim at jtmiller.com Mon Apr 1 10:22:38 2019 From: jim at jtmiller.com (Jim Miller) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 10:22:38 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] SDR on K3 IF to look for RFI Message-ID: Now that 160 season is almost over and my antenna farm is doing good I'm going to start chasing RFI at my new QTH. I plan to use my RSP2Pro with HDSDR to do some time lapse recording to see when things come and go as a first step. To do this I plan to use my existing antennas and I'd like to avoid connecting and disconnecting my rig as much as possible. So I'd like to use the IF port of the K3s. That's currently passed to the P3 and I thought I could use its IF output to drive the SDR. That would allow me to leave it connected all the time even while using the K3 for normal use. How wide is the bandwidth of that port? Is it limited to the 200Khz the P3 presents? Thanks Jim ab3cv From dave at nk7z.net Mon Apr 1 10:31:55 2019 From: dave at nk7z.net (Dave Cole (NK7Z)) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:31:55 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] SDR on K3 IF to look for RFI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Jim, You want to look at a wider range of frequencies than the K3 IF presents. See: https://www.nk7z.net/sdr-rfi-survey-p1/ for a how to do this, using an SDRPlay radio. That link goes to part 1 of a multi-part set of articles covering how I use SDRPlay radios to see just what is happening in my RF world. Part 2 covers interpreting what you see using a very wide band long term recording of your RF environment. It helps very much in taming RFI to look as you are proposing to do. 73s and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Technical Specialist ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL OOC for Oregon On 4/1/19 7:22 AM, Jim Miller wrote: > Now that 160 season is almost over and my antenna farm is doing good I'm > going to start chasing RFI at my new QTH. > > I plan to use my RSP2Pro with HDSDR to do some time lapse recording to see > when things come and go as a first step. > > To do this I plan to use my existing antennas and I'd like to avoid > connecting and disconnecting my rig as much as possible. > > So I'd like to use the IF port of the K3s. That's currently passed to the > P3 and I thought I could use its IF output to drive the SDR. > > That would allow me to leave it connected all the time even while using the > K3 for normal use. > > How wide is the bandwidth of that port? Is it limited to the 200Khz the P3 > presents? > > Thanks > > Jim ab3cv > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From rmcgraw at blomand.net Mon Apr 1 10:44:51 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 09:44:51 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] SDR on K3 IF to look for RFI In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The approach I've used is to use a couple of BNC to BNC jumpers and a BNC "T" connector.? Connect the RX OUT to one side of the "T".? Connect the RX IN to the other side of the "T" connector. Connect the? RSP2 to the other port on the "T" connector.? Then press the RX ANT on the radio.? This allows the radio to be active and the RSP2 at the same time.? All is protected when/if you transmit. This gives a very wide bandwidth based on the front end of the K3 and is much wider than the K3 IF. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/1/2019 9:22 AM, Jim Miller wrote: > Now that 160 season is almost over and my antenna farm is doing good I'm > going to start chasing RFI at my new QTH. > > I plan to use my RSP2Pro with HDSDR to do some time lapse recording to see > when things come and go as a first step. > > To do this I plan to use my existing antennas and I'd like to avoid > connecting and disconnecting my rig as much as possible. > > So I'd like to use the IF port of the K3s. That's currently passed to the > P3 and I thought I could use its IF output to drive the SDR. > > That would allow me to leave it connected all the time even while using the > K3 for normal use. > > How wide is the bandwidth of that port? Is it limited to the 200Khz the P3 > presents? > > Thanks > > Jim ab3cv > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From pokirley at gmail.com Mon Apr 1 10:47:04 2019 From: pokirley at gmail.com (Paul Kirley) Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 14:47:04 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3-New Feature request Message-ID: K9OM sed: I really like the idea of adding the capability to the K3 that allows us to adjust the left and right channel volume. Then W4TV sed: It's already there. Please refer to the K3/K3S Owner's Manual and look up CONFG:SUB AF. But: The SUB AF setting does nothing for my K3, probably because it lacks a sub receiver. Is there an alternate suggestion? 73, Paul W8TM From clark.macaulay at gmail.com Mon Apr 1 10:52:55 2019 From: clark.macaulay at gmail.com (engineercm) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 07:52:55 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] Out with the Old Message-ID: <1554130375243-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Just had to comment on the iconography of the March 2019 Old Stuff Day. I'm old enough to have witnessed all of the icons on that page. Bumper cars? Of course. Manual typewriter (with the beloved Courier font? Natch. VW bus? Never drove one but saw many on the road. All of these are no longer in production---except the K2. I know, the K2 was not announced in the same year as bumper cars, but to some it is Old Stuff given the newer digital rigs of the day. My K2 #6011 is still very much alive and a joy to operate in CW (my preferred mode) as a QRP rig. Today, QRP rigs are available at a lower cost, but, IMHO, the K2 still offers the most enjoyment/$ for building and operating. What a hoot: the K2 in the same picture as the lava lamp. The K2 won't last forever, of course, but the run it has had is a tribute to the vision and engineering prowess of the Elecraft team. Thanks for the memories. -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From brianpepperdine at sympatico.ca Mon Apr 1 11:29:00 2019 From: brianpepperdine at sympatico.ca (Brian) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 15:29:00 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 audio balance feature - a modest proposal Message-ID: While I agree that the left-right audio balance feature would be nice to see in a basic K3 etc. as update etc. why not just build an outside box to accomplish that. Therefore it could be used on your legacy rigs as well. I could myself use a bit more in the Left side I think. I already have such a thing as two blending pots in a box that was originally used in my CD Discman to send audio to my regular stereo amp.. two pots for two signals to balance the sound for the uneven room acoustics (some High End amps - British, you say - don't have a Balance control and I believe was the intent). Over the winter I built an external audio CW filter that does WONDERS for older rigs (not Elecraft... of course) .. makes them a lot better. I just tried it out on a HW-8 this morning and it totally changes the aspects of the rig. Makes my Drake TR-7 usable.. the old Drake CW filters either were not good to be begin with (in comparison to....) or have aged to ringy/hollow sound. Who knows.. but the external CW audio filter (HiPerMite) is a game changer. This makes for a better situation and I did not have to go into the inner guts or workings of any rigs to achieve the 'update'. So perhaps Wayne and Eric don't have to do all the work... sometimes we can change things for the better by implementing a little of our own soldering and building skills. Now onto the New England SCAF that is almost finished and ready to test out in a cage match... HI. Humbly submitted. Brien VE3VAW From eric at elecraft.com Mon Apr 1 11:56:13 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 08:56:13 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.10 In-Reply-To: <223371920.13884011.1554004649403@mail.yahoo.com> References: <223371920.13884011.1554004649403.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <223371920.13884011.1554004649403@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <6b1656f6-b254-2f82-b2d0-d8a21b520903@elecraft.com> Yes, we agree - the delay and averaging for forward power for just the LCD display was incorrectly set to too low of a value in 2.10. Fortunately this is only a LCD display issue and does not impact the Power/SWR bargraph or internal operations of the amp. We'll get this fixed in a new f/w update this week. Eric /elecraft.com/ On 3/30/2019 8:57 PM, Roy Morris, Jr. via Elecraft wrote: > After loading v.2.10 the LEDs seem to show the correct power level at or near the 1500 watt level.? At reduced power levels the LEDs stream faster but seem to also show the correct power level.The blue display window does not show the correct power level.? It consistently shows a very low power level.? Roy Morris? W4WFB From raysills3 at verizon.net Mon Apr 1 12:03:02 2019 From: raysills3 at verizon.net (Raymond Sills) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:03:02 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] K3 audio balance feature - a modest proposal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <581814382.13181123.1554134582797@mail.yahoo.com> Hi Group: Don't forget, it's not difficult to feed the rig's audio output to a modest audio mixer (check a music store), which would easily permit you to independently adjust the audio levels of the feed to your headset or speakers. ?This could be made to work for a "mono" feed (single receiver) or a "stereo" feed (two receivers). 73 de RayK2ULRKX3 #211 From pubx1 at af2z.net Mon Apr 1 12:05:45 2019 From: pubx1 at af2z.net (Drew AF2Z) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:05:45 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3-New Feature request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1eda02ae-37cb-8765-7ed5-8d4626009d95@af2z.net> You could run the K3 audio through your computer system and adjust the balance in its sound mixer. Or install more sophisticated mixing software like VoiceMeeter which will give you a 15-band graphic equalizer and processing effects; also a handy way to record on air activity. 73, Drew AF2Z On 04/01/19 10:47, Paul Kirley wrote: > K9OM sed: > I really like the idea of adding the capability to the K3 that allows us > to adjust the left and right channel volume. > > Then W4TV sed: > It's already there. Please refer to the K3/K3S Owner's Manual and look > up CONFG:SUB AF. > > But: > The SUB AF setting does nothing for my K3, probably because it lacks a > sub receiver. Is there an alternate suggestion? > > > 73, Paul W8TM > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From rmcgraw at blomand.net Mon Apr 1 12:09:32 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:09:32 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3-New Feature request In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yes, I use a pair of powered computer type speakers.? Feed the two audio outputs from the K3 which are on the SPEAKERS/STEREO jack to the L and R speaker respectfully.? Adjust the volume on each speaker as you desire. The ones I use are from the defunct Radio Shack being a Realistic Cat 40-1313.?? These have the volume control on the front of each speaker. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/1/2019 9:47 AM, Paul Kirley wrote: > K9OM sed: > I really like the idea of adding the capability to the K3 that allows > us to adjust the left and right channel volume. > > Then W4TV sed: > It's already there. Please refer to the K3/K3S Owner's Manual and look > up CONFG:SUB AF. > > But: > The SUB AF setting does nothing for my K3, probably because it lacks a > sub receiver. Is there an alternate suggestion? > > > 73, Paul W8TM > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From kevinr at coho.net Mon Apr 1 12:43:29 2019 From: kevinr at coho.net (kevinr) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 09:43:29 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft Inc. circa 2497 Message-ID: Wayne and Eric are still running the company, both having taken /T//he Elixir/ in 2025.? Elecraft currently generates 12.3 % of the Earth?s gross domestic product. Wayne created the ultimate radio outfit ensemble.? His universal heat modulator layer worn next to the skin to wick off excess heat in the summer and provide warmth in the winter.? He fiddled with its design until it was also an effective Faraday cage.? The outer layer of the suit was redesigned to become his antenna. ? Seated or standing it was a fine radiator at QRP power levels but absolutely amazing when he cranked the power up to 1500 watts.? The aura projected at higher power settings was skillfully portrayed by marketing in the virt-ads we see floating around us. While experimenting with shrinking his latest transceivers he serendipitously created an amazing power source.? After placing his first batch of rigs in the shrink chamber he hit the button. ? 87% of the rigs shrank to their intended size but the rest experienced a cascade failure and became stable, mini-black holes. ? Luckily his lab is in orbit so he vented them into space and sat a while in thought.? Eric wandered by and saw his chum?s gloomy visage.? ?What?s up Wayne??, he asked. ?I shrank my first set of transceivers today and only 87% of them stabilized at their new size. ? The rest became quantum black holes.? ?Did you keep any of them for testing or did you dump them?? ?I vented them Eric.? ?Next time keep a few for testing, I have an idea.? Wayne set up the next batch for miniaturizing and hit the button.? Again 87% of the rigs turned out fine. ? Perfect 1 centimeter cubes ready to be implanted into Elecraft?s customers. ? The remaining 13% disappeared as they shrank but he captured them in a containment field so Eric could test his hypothesis. Eric left his virtual meeting with the other world leaders and started his experimentation.? He had read Wayne?s reports on the shrink process and found an interesting scaling principle.? Once the transceivers shrank to less than 1 nanometer their gravitational force grew immensely powerful.? When they became quantum black holes they could be used as power sources.? He wrote some back of the iPod calculations and left them for Wayne?s eager mind. As they experimented with the ?failed? rigs over the next week the two built a harness to contain them and capture their phenomenal power.? After a month they had the basis of a working product.? The Eternal Power Source ? was ready. ? A steady 1 terawatt output for an estimated 500 years was eternal enough for the marketing folks.? Elecraft Inc. was ready to double the company?s contribution to the Earth?s GDP.? It was also ready to transform the transportation industry once Wayne tamed the quantum side effects of their creation.? Localized quantum tunneling fields described in Eric?s initial notes gave them yet another product to market.? Luckily their minions were prepared for the deluge of orders over the next six months. His quest for ever smaller radios had lead Wayne to create another spin-off company for Eric to administer. From eric at elecraft.com Mon Apr 1 12:49:28 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 09:49:28 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] For Sale Post From NF5S In-Reply-To: <7CEC93AA-6477-40A5-A549-963E5029594D@icloud.com> References: <1528FF4B-27C0-481D-AF3F-CE2DE1F85C40@comcast.net> <7CEC93AA-6477-40A5-A549-963E5029594D@icloud.com> Message-ID: <374d91af-1ccb-c607-38f2-e7ff1b60453b@elecraft.com> Folks - If you suspect fraud or a problem with a for sale posting to the list like the one below, please email me as the moderator instead of posting to the list. Or if I am unavailable, email sales at elecraft.com and we will look into it In this case the for sale email below appears to be legitimate. The email address in the posting, davbarbar at comcast.net , matches our records here for the callsign and name listed in the for sale email below. And that person is a long time Elecraft customer who did purchase a KX3 and PX3 from Elecraft some time ago. 73, Eric Moderator /elecraft.com/ On 3/29/2019 10:51 PM, Rick McGaver via Elecraft wrote: > Scam! > Sent from my iPad ======== >> On Mar 29, 2019, at 2:23 PM, BARBARA/DAVID BARON wrote: >> >> KX3/PX3 For Sale. $2200 value for $1100. Full details at davbarbar at comcast.net . >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> From n6kr at elecraft.com Mon Apr 1 12:50:42 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 09:50:42 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft Inc. circa 2497 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8ACD5F58-3386-4E07-AA98-A632B0EF64E2@elecraft.com> Thanks for the heads-up. Lillian is busy canceling our retirement plans. Wayne > kevinr wrote: > > Wayne and Eric are still running the company, both having taken /T//he Elixir/ in 2025. Elecraft currently generates 12.3 % of the Earth?s gross domestic product. > From wa2si at arrl.net Mon Apr 1 13:09:06 2019 From: wa2si at arrl.net (Bert Craig) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:09:06 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Out with the Old In-Reply-To: <1554130375243-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1554130375243-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <001001d4e8ad$9d5e3490$d81a9db0$@arrl.net> Great commentary on the venerable K2. I had an experience that some on this reflector might find interesting. I purchased a Yaesu FT-991A solely for the purpose of VHF/UHF SSB/CW. (Our local group's been buggin' me to join them on 2m SSB, hihi.) Well, I saw C8T on the cluster and decided to give them a call. I wanted to try the FT-991A on hf, so I unscrewed the PL-259 from the back of the K2/100, moved it over to the Yaesu, and tuned to 40m. Nothing heard. I made sure the filter selection was correct, toggled the IPO settings, etc., still nothing. Switched back to the K2/100 (S/N 3595, fresh from a Don Wilhelm, W3FPR, thorough upgrade and alignment.) and voil?, there was C8T. Oh it was weak, to be sure, but readable and subsequently in my log. I mentioned this to Joel Hallas, W1ZR, during an email discussion re. his FT-991A QST review and he commented that, while the K2 is a fine radio, he was surprised. I'm not, the K2's still higher on the Sherwood Receiver Test List for a reason. (Albeit that ranking's just by close in Dynamic Range, DR3.) I'll eventually get a CW optimized K3S, however, I'll always love my K2/100. Vy 73 de Bert WA2SI -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of engineercm Sent: Monday, April 01, 2019 10:53 To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Out with the Old "I know, the K2 was not announced in the same year as bumper cars, but to some it is Old Stuff given the newer digital rigs of the day. My K2 #6011 is still very much alive and a joy to operate in CW (my preferred mode) as a QRP rig. Today, QRP rigs are available at a lower cost, but, IMHO, the K2 still offers the most enjoyment/$ for building and operating." From eric at elecraft.com Mon Apr 1 13:19:20 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 10:19:20 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 210 (209) Firmware Bug? In-Reply-To: <1553834455671-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1553834455671-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Hi Bill, We just caught this and it will be corrected in the next 1500 f/w release. 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 3/28/2019 9:40 PM, K8TE wrote: > I brought my KPA1500 to Lubbock for the CQ WW WPX SSB Contest. Like a good > Elecraft owner, I checked for firmware updates using the KPA1500 Utility, > downloaded what is actually version 210, and installed it. Next, I checked > the integration with the IC-7610, KPA1500, and antenna switch. Much to my > chagrin, the KPA1500 did not understand CI-V frequency information above > 3800 KHz and throughout the 160m band! My next thought was to panic, but > good Air Force troubleshooting techniques came through. > > The antenna switch understood the radio, but not the amplifier. It worked > in the ARRL DX SSB Contest. Loading an previous configuration did not > change the symptom. I downloaded version 207 and that fixed the problem! > > BTW, I downloaded version 210 three times and the same symptom occurred with > each. I tried all other HF bands without failure. I suggest a quick look > by someone who understands (wrote) the update. As long as you stay below > 3800 and don't use 160m, you won't experience this problem. Of course, the > KPA1500 frequency counter took over, but that is not "smooth" at full power > and I don't like red LED's shining in my face. > > 73, and good luck in the contest! Bill, K8TE > > > > From eric at elecraft.com Mon Apr 1 13:20:32 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 10:20:32 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 XCVR FREQ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <830ba129-1cd0-8d78-fc7c-9df05e0e762c@elecraft.com> Hi Brad, I apologize for the confusion on this. The following K3/K3S menu entry enables the K3/K3S to send out the transmit frequency on the AUXBUS cable to the amp and external tuner. In the K3/K3S KAT3 menu item, tap the 1 key to set it to "KAT500=Y". It?s documented in the current shipping KPA1500 owners manual, Rev B1 (2/12/19), on page 20 at the bottom. (Its also on the website.) Eric /elecraft.com/ On 3/31/2019 2:47 PM, Brad Denison wrote: > I am noticing that with my KPA1500 connected to my K3S via the aux cable > that XCVR FREQ always shows 0. All other functions between the rig and amp > seem to work such as band changes and TX COUNT always shows the counted > frequency. XCVR FREQ is a constant 0 so any ideas from the group on if I > have missed a setting somewhere to ensure that this works. I am under the > impression that the KPA1500 should be getting and displaying correct > frequency info from teh K3S. > > Thanks, > > Brad > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From brad.denison at gmail.com Mon Apr 1 13:44:10 2019 From: brad.denison at gmail.com (Brad Denison) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 13:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 XCVR FREQ In-Reply-To: <830ba129-1cd0-8d78-fc7c-9df05e0e762c@elecraft.com> References: <830ba129-1cd0-8d78-fc7c-9df05e0e762c@elecraft.com> Message-ID: Awesome, thanks! On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 1:20 PM Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft < eric at elecraft.com> wrote: > Hi Brad, > > I apologize for the confusion on this. > > The following K3/K3S menu entry enables the K3/K3S to send out the > transmit frequency on the AUXBUS cable to the amp and external tuner. > > In the K3/K3S KAT3 menu item, tap the 1 key to set it to "KAT500=Y". > > It?s documented in the current shipping KPA1500 owners manual, Rev B1 > (2/12/19), on page 20 at the bottom. (Its also on the website.) > > Eric > *elecraft.com * > > On 3/31/2019 2:47 PM, Brad Denison wrote: > > I am noticing that with my KPA1500 connected to my K3S via the aux cable > that XCVR FREQ always shows 0. All other functions between the rig and amp > seem to work such as band changes and TX COUNT always shows the counted > frequency. XCVR FREQ is a constant 0 so any ideas from the group on if I > have missed a setting somewhere to ensure that this works. I am under the > impression that the KPA1500 should be getting and displaying correct > frequency info from teh K3S. > > Thanks, > > Brad > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > From k2asp at kanafi.org Mon Apr 1 14:05:56 2019 From: k2asp at kanafi.org (Phil Kane) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 11:05:56 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Out with the Old In-Reply-To: <1554130375243-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1554130375243-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <3b7a9ba8-14c7-a227-546b-f4997cf6c929@kanafi.org> On 4/1/2019 7:52 AM, engineercm wrote: > Bumper cars? Of course. Manual typewriter (with the beloved Courier > font? Natch. VW bus? Never drove one but saw many on the road. > > All of these are no longer in production---except the K2. I used a manual typewriter until I got a Selectric that was in use until 1999. Never had a VW Bus but I had a 1953 VW Bug and later a 1963 Bug that I did several engine rebuilds and a 12V conversion but sold it in 1986 before it fell apart. K2 old? Mine is the newest rig on the shelf, just beating out my ICOM IC-2820 VHF/UHF rig. I don't get to use the K2 much any more after moving from the house with 13 - count 'em - 13 antennas (2 HF ones) to an apartment with only a porch-mounted mag-loop for HF - at least I got to have my VHF/UHF j-poles and ground-planes, only after the very grunting acceptance of the property owners after I played my "emergency communication" card. 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 >From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon From clark.macaulay at gmail.com Mon Apr 1 15:25:21 2019 From: clark.macaulay at gmail.com (engineercm) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 12:25:21 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] Out with the Old In-Reply-To: <1554130375243-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1554130375243-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1554146721979-0.post@n2.nabble.com> I see my name and call were not included. My bad. Some reflectors (groups.io) insert it; other's don't. So, i forgot. My posts on this reflector and few; I'll try and remember in the future! 72, Clark WU4B EM73 - Atlanta, GA K2 #6011 -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From dl2mdu at darc.de Mon Apr 1 16:23:04 2019 From: dl2mdu at darc.de (Christian Friess) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 22:23:04 +0200 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: Remote antenna tuner In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I am sorry for any confusion. But I used that antenna on the Maldives Isl. and from D4 (Cape Verde) with great success. 3200 + QSOs as D44TUK on CW and 1400 as D44TUQ (my YL) on RTTY was verifying that. To answer your question now, I have seen that combination with the 4:1 balun at one of our competitors in the IARU Fieldday Contest. That was before K3 when the Kenwood TS 850S was the first choice of serious contester. I love that marvelously performing ANTENNA TUNER in my K3 73 de Chris, DL2MDU Am 31.03.2019 um 20:58 schrieb Bob McGraw K4TAX: > Chris: > > Out of curiosity, why did you choose to use a 4:1 balun with that > antenna/feed line configuration and not a 1:1 balun? > > I have a center fed wire fed with 450 ohm twin lead window line and I > use a 1:1 balun which I'm told is correct. > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX > > > > On 3/31/2019 1:51 PM, Christian Friess wrote: >> On my holiday style operations I use a doublet with 300 Ohm twin lead >> cable. >> The end of that 300 Ohm feeder is connected to a 4:1 BALUN >> The BALUN is hooked direct to the K3S / K3 >> With the internal ATU I can use that antenna from 10 to 80 with 100 >> Watts >> >> For details have a look to http://www.dl2mdu.de/antenna/ >> >> 73 de Chris, DL2MDU >> >> Am 31.03.2019 um 18:44 schrieb W2xj: >>> I would disagree. Most high power commercial operations use >>> non-resonant mismatched antennas. Typically there is either a tuner >>> at the antenna or open wire is used. >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>>> On Mar 31, 2019, at 12:13 PM, Ken G Kopp wrote: >>>> >>>> If an antenna is showing a VSVR of 3:1, something about the situation >>>> is wrong, and most likely it's -not- the antenna.? Fix the problem >>>> ? feed >>>> the antenna power where it's resonant, assuming the antenna is >>>> actually >>>> resonant on the amateur band of interest.? Expecting a tuner to >>>> compensate >>>> for a problem external to an antenna is unreasonable, IMO >>>> >>>> 73! >>>> >>>> Ken - K0PP >>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>> >>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From n6kr at elecraft.com Mon Apr 1 17:11:24 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 14:11:24 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft Inc. circa 2497 In-Reply-To: <8ACD5F58-3386-4E07-AA98-A632B0EF64E2@elecraft.com> References: <8ACD5F58-3386-4E07-AA98-A632B0EF64E2@elecraft.com> Message-ID: <5755852F-0CD5-443B-AE33-5095C964773D@elecraft.com> Joking, BTW. Eric and I both have a good 20 years to go :) Wayne ---- elecraft.com > On Apr 1, 2019, at 9:50 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote: > > Thanks for the heads-up. Lillian is busy canceling our retirement plans. > > Wayne > > >> kevinr wrote: >> >> Wayne and Eric are still running the company, both having taken /T//he Elixir/ in 2025. Elecraft currently generates 12.3 % of the Earth?s gross domestic product. >> From jpcumminssr at gmail.com Mon Apr 1 17:14:13 2019 From: jpcumminssr at gmail.com (John P. Cummins, Sr.) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:14:13 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Need original KX2 side panels Message-ID: <05e40e6a-ce23-eac4-f7f5-90fe83087c22@jpcummins.net> Anyone have some that they would like to dispose of..? John Pickett, AD4S From wa2si at arrl.net Mon Apr 1 17:28:06 2019 From: wa2si at arrl.net (Bert Craig) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 17:28:06 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Test Message-ID: Test - My messages have not been appearing on the reflector. Bert, WA2SI From ab2tc at arrl.net Mon Apr 1 18:03:50 2019 From: ab2tc at arrl.net (ab2tc) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 15:03:50 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] Test In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1554156230529-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Hi Bert, Well, this one is, so you must have found a solution. AB2TC - Knut Bert Craig wrote > Test - My messages have not been appearing on the reflector. > > Bert, WA2SI > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto: > Elecraft at .qth > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From ve3bwp at gmail.com Mon Apr 1 18:53:05 2019 From: ve3bwp at gmail.com (ve3bwp) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 15:53:05 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] Setting up FLDIGI on K3s In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1554159185331-0.post@n2.nabble.com> I am running into the exact same thing. fldigi gets audio and freq from rig no problem. USB codec selected for fldigi output but rig just shows TX light but no power out or ALC indication on rig. Nothing plugged into line in jack. Rig set to TX DATA. MIC SEL = Line in on rig. Same symptoms with FreeDV and WSJTx... USB audio and rig control fine and PPT works but no rig sound card going out. anyone else find this and solved it? Thanks, Brian ve3bwp -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From ve3bwp at gmail.com Mon Apr 1 19:27:15 2019 From: ve3bwp at gmail.com (ve3bwp) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 16:27:15 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] Setting up FLDIGI on K3s In-Reply-To: <1554159185331-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1554159185331-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1554161235233-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Solved it. In TX DATA mode the MIC level controls the LINE IN Level (dah!). So add that to your checklist! Mine was at the default 0. Turned it up and level 5 seems to be the right amount of drive. Thanks all. Brian ve3bwp -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From k3bh at arrl.net Mon Apr 1 19:29:07 2019 From: k3bh at arrl.net (Jay Rutherford) Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2019 19:29:07 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Setting up FLDIGI on K3s In-Reply-To: <1554159185331-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1554159185331-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: I hope someone has solved this, too, as I am having the identical problem with my KX3. Other digital modes like FT8 work FB. I would like to not have to use VOX to key the rig. I suspect that I just haven't found the right combination of trial & error. Jay K3BH On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, at 18:53, ve3bwp wrote: > I am running into the exact same thing. fldigi gets audio and freq from rig > no problem. USB codec selected for fldigi output but rig just shows TX light > but no power out or ALC indication on rig. Nothing plugged into line in > jack. Rig set to TX DATA. MIC SEL = Line in on rig. Same symptoms with > FreeDV and WSJTx... > > USB audio and rig control fine and PPT works but no rig sound card going > out. > > anyone else find this and solved it? > > Thanks, > > Brian ve3bwp > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From rmcgraw at blomand.net Mon Apr 1 20:19:31 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 19:19:31 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Setting up FLDIGI on K3s In-Reply-To: References: <1554159185331-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <02a7d2fe-308a-85e4-891c-b60074a4bd77@blomand.net> Within FLDIGI there is a transmit audio level control in the lower right corner.??? Just below the LK tab.?? I use a value of -15.? The arrows left and right of the box will increase or decrease the level going to the radio.????? My Line Gain which is adjusted by using the MIC knob is at 30. There are 3 places where the transmit audio level should be adjusted. (a)?? The computer SPKR level.?? {mine is 30%} (b)?? The application transmit audio level?? {mine is -15} (c)?? The radio Line Gain level? {mine is 30} Ideally, they should never be at a maximum or near minimum value but more near "mid range".? I call that between 30 and 50 what ever units that may be. ? ? This will prevent overdrive and distortion of a stage or circuit.? And these should supply adequate level to the radio to produce 4 solid bars showing on the ALC scale.?? With Elecraft radios, always set the transmit power output with the PWR control on the radio and NEVER with the audio level.??? Also be advised that often when one runs another application previously on the computer, the SPKR level many change due to the needs or a previously used value.??? Just the way some things work.?? Always check the values to prevent frustration, bad signals and "nothing works" conditions. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/1/2019 6:29 PM, Jay Rutherford wrote: > I hope someone has solved this, too, as I am having the identical problem with my KX3. Other digital modes like FT8 work FB. I would like to not have to use VOX to key the rig. I suspect that I just haven't found the right combination of trial & error. > > Jay K3BH > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, at 18:53, ve3bwp wrote: >> I am running into the exact same thing. fldigi gets audio and freq from rig >> no problem. USB codec selected for fldigi output but rig just shows TX light >> but no power out or ALC indication on rig. Nothing plugged into line in >> jack. Rig set to TX DATA. MIC SEL = Line in on rig. Same symptoms with >> FreeDV and WSJTx... >> >> USB audio and rig control fine and PPT works but no rig sound card going >> out. >> >> anyone else find this and solved it? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Brian ve3bwp >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From donwilh at embarqmail.com Mon Apr 1 21:17:42 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 21:17:42 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Setting up FLDIGI on K3s In-Reply-To: References: <1554159185331-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <3608d55f-220a-cd09-ea2c-eb66299f37f1@embarqmail.com> To those having problems with DATA modes, take a look at the article on my website www.w3fpr.com. Scroll the left column to the last article and click on it to open the document. While VOX should reliably put the radio into transmit, you can set FLDIGI to use PTT via CAT command - BUT don't use both. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/1/2019 7:29 PM, Jay Rutherford wrote: > I hope someone has solved this, too, as I am having the identical problem with my KX3. Other digital modes like FT8 work FB. I would like to not have to use VOX to key the rig. I suspect that I just haven't found the right combination of trial & error. > > Jay K3BH > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019, at 18:53, ve3bwp wrote: >> I am running into the exact same thing. fldigi gets audio and freq from rig >> no problem. USB codec selected for fldigi output but rig just shows TX light >> but no power out or ALC indication on rig. Nothing plugged into line in >> jack. Rig set to TX DATA. MIC SEL = Line in on rig. Same symptoms with >> FreeDV and WSJTx... >> >> USB audio and rig control fine and PPT works but no rig sound card going >> out. >> >> anyone else find this and solved it? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Brian ve3bwp >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From huntinhmb at coastside.net Mon Apr 1 21:23:45 2019 From: huntinhmb at coastside.net (Brian Hunt) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 18:23:45 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Setting up FLDIGI on K3s In-Reply-To: References: <1554159185331-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1ABF20AD-2FC5-40EC-BD41-9200C6CF89D5@coastside.net> Download and install FLRig. Setup is straight forward and they support K3 (and maybe KX3 but since they're all the same command language, K3 should work). FLRig implements CAT control eliminating the need to use VOX. HTH 73, Brian, K0DTJ From mcpoteet at gmail.com Mon Apr 1 21:43:43 2019 From: mcpoteet at gmail.com (Michael Poteet) Date: Mon, 1 Apr 2019 20:43:43 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft Inc. circa 2497 In-Reply-To: <5755852F-0CD5-443B-AE33-5095C964773D@elecraft.com> References: <8ACD5F58-3386-4E07-AA98-A632B0EF64E2@elecraft.com> <5755852F-0CD5-443B-AE33-5095C964773D@elecraft.com> Message-ID: Wow, I was preparing to dump all of my Elecraft stock in the morning. Mike W5FTD On Monday, April 1, 2019, Wayne Burdick wrote: > Joking, BTW. Eric and I both have a good 20 years to go :) > > Wayne > > > ---- > elecraft.com > > > On Apr 1, 2019, at 9:50 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote: > > > > Thanks for the heads-up. Lillian is busy canceling our retirement plans. > > > > Wayne > > > > > >> kevinr wrote: > >> > >> Wayne and Eric are still running the company, both having taken /T//he > Elixir/ in 2025. Elecraft currently generates 12.3 % of the Earth?s gross > domestic product. > >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From ray2.s at btinternet.com Tue Apr 2 09:29:07 2019 From: ray2.s at btinternet.com (Ray Spreadbury) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 14:29:07 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Problem with Filters Message-ID: <00ca01d4e958$0d402b10$27c08130$@btinternet.com> I have recently fitted a Sub Receiver & some additional filters to my new to me K3S. I now have in the main RX, a 6K for AM, a 2.8K, 2.1K, 0.4K & 0.25K. In the sub RX there is a 2.8K, 2.1K, 0.7K, 0.4K & 0.25K. I have a problem with the 0.4K filter position in both receivers. Between about 0.45 & 0.35 in both receivers there is an immediate drop in volume, still copyable but not working correctly. Does anyone have any ideas what the problem may be? 73 Ray G3XLG From donwilh at embarqmail.com Tue Apr 2 10:04:34 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:04:34 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Problem with Filters In-Reply-To: <00ca01d4e958$0d402b10$27c08130$@btinternet.com> References: <00ca01d4e958$0d402b10$27c08130$@btinternet.com> Message-ID: Ray, You can set the gain parameter (FLxGN) parameter in the menu to compensate for that. Either use K3 Utility or set it manually in the CONFIG menu. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/2/2019 9:29 AM, Ray Spreadbury via Elecraft wrote: > I have recently fitted a Sub Receiver & some additional filters to my new to > me K3S. I now have in the main RX, a 6K for AM, a 2.8K, 2.1K, 0.4K & 0.25K. > In the sub RX there is a 2.8K, 2.1K, 0.7K, 0.4K & 0.25K. I have a problem > with the 0.4K filter position in both receivers. Between about 0.45 & 0.35 > in both receivers there is an immediate drop in volume, still copyable but > not working correctly. From n7dsx73 at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 10:04:54 2019 From: n7dsx73 at gmail.com (Dan Smith) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 07:04:54 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 to Non-Elecraft Linear Amp Message-ID: I am looking to see if anyone else has used an Ameritron AL811 with their KX3 with positive results. I plan on buying the KXPA100, but after buying the Shack in a Bag, I will need to put it off for a little bit. In the mean time, I would like to try using what I have, but I am hesitant to try since the KX3 is new to me and I don't want to harm anything. I have a base station radio that plugs into the Ameritron AL811 by way of the ARB-704 and it works great with 70 watts going it to make 600 watts going out. The ARB amp line is a simple RCA jack from the ARB 704 to the rear of the Amp, but the radio cord is the Multi cord plugged into my base station. I know I can unplug the multi cord and use the RCA jack on the back of the ARB 704 "radio" input, but I am not sure where that will plug into. I know that I can only push 15 watts max into the Ameritron, but wouldn't that mean that I could get somewhere around 180 watts out of it? Would it work like that? I bought the cable pack from Elecraft, so I am pretty sure I have everything that I need to make it happen, but I would love the advice of someone on here that may have already done this, or has good information on why I should not try this. I could also use help in which plugs to plug where. Thank you for any information that anybody may be able to give and please forgive me if this has been posted somewhere already. I have done my best to search for several days online and in this forum, but I am not coming up with any answers. 73, Dan N7DSX From ray2.s at btinternet.com Tue Apr 2 10:36:55 2019 From: ray2.s at btinternet.com (Ray Spreadbury) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:36:55 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Problem with Filters Message-ID: <00cf01d4e961$85eb31f0$91c195d0$@btinternet.com> I had done that Don as per the Manual - 1-2dB for 400Hz & 3-4 dB for the 250Hz filter. To get the right level of loudness I have had to add the max ie.8 dB. So, is something else wrong? Ray G3XLG From donwilh at embarqmail.com Tue Apr 2 10:45:23 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:45:23 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 to Non-Elecraft Linear Amp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <76016a4b-45a6-1387-de2e-aca2112fedf4@embarqmail.com> Dan, The KX3 has a KEYINE OUT output which will key your amplifier. It is on the ring contact of the ACC 2.5mm jack. See page 5 of the KX3 manual. When you add the KXPA100, there is a "black box" on the KX3 to KXPA100 cable set which brings that KEYLINE signal out to an RCA jack. See the KXPA100 manual. So if you have only the KX3 now, you will have to build a cable which takes the ring contact of a 2.5mm stereo plug out to an RCA plug which you would connect to your amplifier. The KX3 KEYLINE output is rated to accept up to 30 volts and up to 100ma. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/2/2019 10:04 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > I am looking to see if anyone else has used an Ameritron AL811 with their > KX3 with positive results. > > I plan on buying the KXPA100, but after buying the Shack in a Bag, I will > need to put it off for a little bit. In the mean time, I would like to try > using what I have, but I am hesitant to try since the KX3 is new to me and > I don't want to harm anything. > > I have a base station radio that plugs into the Ameritron AL811 by way of > the ARB-704 and it works great with 70 watts going it to make 600 watts > going out. The ARB amp line is a simple RCA jack from the ARB 704 to the > rear of the Amp, but the radio cord is the Multi cord plugged into my base > station. I know I can unplug the multi cord and use the RCA jack on the > back of the ARB 704 "radio" input, but I am not sure where that will plug > into. > > I know that I can only push 15 watts max into the Ameritron, but wouldn't > that mean that I could get somewhere around 180 watts out of it? Would it > work like that? > > I bought the cable pack from Elecraft, so I am pretty sure I have > everything that I need to make it happen, but I would love the advice of > someone on here that may have already done this, or has good information on > why I should not try this. I could also use help in which plugs to plug > where. > > Thank you for any information that anybody may be able to give and please > forgive me if this has been posted somewhere already. I have done my best > to search for several days online and in this forum, but I am not coming up > with any answers. > > 73, > > Dan > N7DSX > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From donwilh at embarqmail.com Tue Apr 2 10:47:59 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 10:47:59 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Problem with Filters In-Reply-To: <00cf01d4e961$85eb31f0$91c195d0$@btinternet.com> References: <00cf01d4e961$85eb31f0$91c195d0$@btinternet.com> Message-ID: Ray, I doubt that there is anything else wrong. Each filter will vary in its gain (actually loss) amount. The 4 dB stated in the menu listing for the 400 and 250 Hz filters is only a starting point. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/2/2019 10:36 AM, Ray Spreadbury via Elecraft wrote: > I had done that Don as per the Manual - 1-2dB for 400Hz & 3-4 dB for the > 250Hz filter. > > To get the right level of loudness I have had to add the max ie.8 dB. So, is > something else wrong? > > Ray G3XLG > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From hs0zed at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 11:54:35 2019 From: hs0zed at gmail.com (Martin Sole) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 22:54:35 +0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Problem with Filters In-Reply-To: <00ca01d4e958$0d402b10$27c08130$@btinternet.com> References: <00ca01d4e958$0d402b10$27c08130$@btinternet.com> Message-ID: <9ac1e5ab-93f0-0e7b-8e76-275fc0ab3250@gmail.com> My two narrowest filters have CONFIG -> FLx GN set to 6dB as opposed to 0dB for the others. Press the number keypad to select the appropriate filter. Martin, HS0ZED On 02/04/2019 20:29, Ray Spreadbury via Elecraft wrote: > I have recently fitted a Sub Receiver & some additional filters to my new to > me K3S. I now have in the main RX, a 6K for AM, a 2.8K, 2.1K, 0.4K & 0.25K. > In the sub RX there is a 2.8K, 2.1K, 0.7K, 0.4K & 0.25K. I have a problem > with the 0.4K filter position in both receivers. Between about 0.45 & 0.35 > in both receivers there is an immediate drop in volume, still copyable but > not working correctly. > > Does anyone have any ideas what the problem may be? > > 73 > > Ray G3XLG > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From wb4ooa at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 11:59:21 2019 From: wb4ooa at gmail.com (Ron Durie) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 11:59:21 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 Message-ID: <002e01d4e96d$096c3320$1c449960$@gmail.com> Just installed new Firm-Ware Version 2.17. It has solved all the digital wattmeter anomalies and is working perfectly here. I recommend this version for next standard Firm-Ware update. Thank you. 73's Ron Durie WB4OOA Elecraft K-Line 704-843-3681 From dick at elecraft.com Tue Apr 2 12:14:49 2019 From: dick at elecraft.com (Dick Dievendorff) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 09:14:49 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 In-Reply-To: <002e01d4e96d$096c3320$1c449960$@gmail.com> References: <002e01d4e96d$096c3320$1c449960$@gmail.com> Message-ID: <001a01d4e96f$32a828f0$97f87ad0$@elecraft.com> Thanks, Ron! 73 de Dick, K6KR -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Ron Durie Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 08:59 To: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 Just installed new Firm-Ware Version 2.17. It has solved all the digital wattmeter anomalies and is working perfectly here. I recommend this version for next standard Firm-Ware update. Thank you. 73's Ron Durie WB4OOA Elecraft K-Line 704-843-3681 ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From k6xk at ncn.net Tue Apr 2 12:24:24 2019 From: k6xk at ncn.net (Roy Koeppe) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 11:24:24 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 In-Reply-To: <001a01d4e96f$32a828f0$97f87ad0$@elecraft.com> References: <002e01d4e96d$096c3320$1c449960$@gmail.com> <001a01d4e96f$32a828f0$97f87ad0$@elecraft.com> Message-ID: <3E5DDF01024C4490862828E23BC0A90C@ROYKOEPPEHP> Ditto, Ron! 73, Roy K6XK Thanks, Ron! 73 de Dick, K6KR Just installed new Firm-Ware Version 2.17. It has solved all the digital wattmeter anomalies and is working perfectly here. I recommend this version for next standard Firm-Ware update. Thank you. 73's Ron Durie WB4OOA Elecraft K-Line 704-843-3681 From donwilh at embarqmail.com Tue Apr 2 12:58:01 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:58:01 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 to Non-Elecraft Linear Amp In-Reply-To: References: <76016a4b-45a6-1387-de2e-aca2112fedf4@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: Dan, That looks like it should work fine. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/2/2019 11:50 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > > Thank you, Don. > > I think I have the Elecraft cable for the Keyline output/ACC2 as it > came with the cable pack that I purchased. > > >From this lead, I would connect the RCA to the RCA amp port on the > ARB 704 interface as the buffer step between the transceiver and the > amplifier as is the case with my base station, correct? > > Can you confirm that this will isolate the KX3 from the amp and not > cause any damage to either? Under normal/best case circumstances. > > Does this look right? > Image > > > Image > > > Thank you so much for your help with this. > > 73, > > Dan > N7DSX > > > > > From: Don Wilhelm > Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 7:45 AM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 to Non-Elecraft Linear Amp > To: Dan Smith, elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > Dan, The KX3 has a KEYINE OUT output which will key your amplifier. It > is on the ring contact of the ACC 2.5mm jack. See page 5 of the KX3 > manual. When you add the KXPA100, there is a "black box" on the KX3 to > KXPA100 cable set which brings that KEYLINE signal out to an RCA jack. > See the KXPA100 manual. So if you have only the KX3 now, you will have > to build a cable which takes the ring contact of a 2.5mm stereo plug > out to an RCA plug which you would connect to your amplifier. The KX3 > KEYLINE output is rated to accept up to 30 volts and up to 100ma. 73, > Don W3FPR On 4/2/2019 10:04 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > I am looking to see > if anyone else has used an Ameritron AL811 with their > KX3 with > positive results. > > I plan on buying the KXPA100, but after buying > the Shack in a Bag, I will > need to put it off for a little bit. In > the mean time, I would like to try > using what I have, but I am > hesitant to try since the KX3 is new to me and > I don't want to harm > anything. > > I have a base station radio that plugs into the > Ameritron AL811 by way of > the ARB-704 and it works great with 70 > watts going it to make 600 watts > going out. The ARB amp line is a > simple RCA jack from the ARB 704 to the > rear of the Amp, but the > radio cord is the Multi cord plugged into my base > station. I know I > can unplug the multi cord and use the RCA jack on the > back of the > ARB 704 "radio" input, but I am not sure where that will plug > into. > > > I know that I can only push 15 watts max into the Ameritron, but > wouldn't > that mean that I could get somewhere around 180 watts out > of it? Would it > work like that? > > I bought the cable pack from > Elecraft, so I am pretty sure I have > everything that I need to make > it happen, but I would love the advice of > someone on here that may > have already done this, or has good information on > why I should not > try this. I could also use help in which plugs to plug > where. > > > Thank you for any information that anybody may be able to give and > please > forgive me if this has been posted somewhere already. I have > done my best > to search for several days online and in this forum, > but I am not coming up > with any answers. > > 73, > > Dan > N7DSX > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > Home: > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: > http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: > mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: > http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: > http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > From w2kj at bellsouth.net Tue Apr 2 14:22:14 2019 From: w2kj at bellsouth.net (Joseph Trombino, Jr) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 14:22:14 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] OOOPS!! Message-ID: <806D30A3-6894-4B03-B1DE-FFAEE4A4F959@bellsouth.net> Sorry for inadvertent email?went to the wrong addressee. 73, Joe W2KJ From w6ya at cox.net Tue Apr 2 15:11:30 2019 From: w6ya at cox.net (Jim McCook) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:11:30 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 Message-ID: <9259ef42-67c8-cec5-0074-8d5a3ebfb3ce@cox.net> I just spent 20 minutes trying to find 2.17 on the Elecraft KPA1500 Firmware download area.? Only 2.10 and earlier betas are shown as available.? I get nowhere with the Utility.? Where is 2.17 hidden?? -Jim From wa6nhc at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 15:27:36 2019 From: wa6nhc at gmail.com (Rick WA6NHC) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:27:36 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 In-Reply-To: <9259ef42-67c8-cec5-0074-8d5a3ebfb3ce@cox.net> References: <9259ef42-67c8-cec5-0074-8d5a3ebfb3ce@cox.net> Message-ID: <7c729796-affe-f9f7-3961-7c931496773a@gmail.com> Beta testers only, be patient; that note was to the wrong list. (no, I'm not one, just waiting like you). Rick nhc On 4/2/2019 12:11 PM, Jim McCook wrote: > I just spent 20 minutes trying to find 2.17 on the Elecraft KPA1500 > Firmware download area.? Only 2.10 and earlier betas are shown as > available.? I get nowhere with the Utility.? Where is 2.17 hidden?? -Jim > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From nskousen at ecsecurityinc.com Tue Apr 2 16:30:10 2019 From: nskousen at ecsecurityinc.com (Niel Skousen) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 14:30:10 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] AlexLoop FS Message-ID: Good Afternoon Gang, I am selling my AlexLoop with a small camera tripod. will ship today or tomorrow, or after 4/15/19 (out of town on vacation) Asking $325 conus, + actual freight for other shipping requests. Niel WA7SSA From pgraitcer at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 16:42:26 2019 From: pgraitcer at gmail.com (Philip L. Graitcer) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:42:26 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] FOR SALE: Complete K3/P3 Station Message-ID: I need to make room in the shack?. K3/100 100 watt 160-6 meter transceiver SN7120, purchased January 2013 for $2249.95, factory-built with following options: -KAT-3 Antenna Tuner $339.95 -KPFLA3A -550 500hZ 5 pole filter $89.95 -KBF3 General Coverage BPF $159.95 In January 2017, this K3 was upgraded by Elecraft to have these K3S features: -KIOB Upgrade (sound car, audio interface) $389.95 -KXV3B-F XOUT/XINT transverter interface $199.95 -KSYN3A UPGD-F synthesizer board upgrade $219.95 -Neoprene Soft Grip VFO A tuning knob $16.95 -CABLP3Y Adapter Cable $29.95 At that time, the K3 was factory calibrated and aligned and ?meets or exceeds all factory specifications.? Elecraft P3 Panadapter SN820 purchased used for $650. -P3SVGA Video Adapter $289.95 installed by me Both units are cosmetically perfect, from non-smoking environment, always in shack. I am original owner of K3. I have manuals, Elecraft invoices, custom covers for both, the handheld microphone, and the original box for the K3. I would like to sell the entire package. $2900, includes shipping in US Phil, W3HZZ From eric at elecraft.com Tue Apr 2 16:44:31 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 13:44:31 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 In-Reply-To: <3E5DDF01024C4490862828E23BC0A90C@ROYKOEPPEHP> References: <002e01d4e96d$096c3320$1c449960$@gmail.com> <001a01d4e96f$32a828f0$97f87ad0$@elecraft.com> <3E5DDF01024C4490862828E23BC0A90C@ROYKOEPPEHP> Message-ID: <6d1282ae-de19-66bf-431d-40ffd0d27890@elecraft.com> Guys - thanks for the help alpha testing 2.17! We should have this up on the website as Beta shortly. 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 4/2/2019 9:24 AM, Roy Koeppe wrote: > Ditto, Ron! > > 73,?? Roy??? K6XK > > > Thanks, Ron! > > 73 de Dick, K6KR > > > Just installed new Firm-Ware Version 2.17.? It has solved all the digital > wattmeter anomalies and is working perfectly > here.? I recommend this version for next standard Firm-Ware update.? Thank > you.? 73's > Ron Durie > WB4OOA > Elecraft K-Line > 704-843-3681 From anyone1545 at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 16:47:20 2019 From: anyone1545 at gmail.com (Gmail) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:47:20 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s Message-ID: <32D6BA7D-A4B2-48DC-BB75-4D18F71BEBED@gmail.com> It appears FLDIGI MAC uses USB for RTTY not the standard LSB. Use data A for RTTY. If AFSK is used FlDIGI needs to be in REV mode. If FLDIGI is not decoding correctly or no one answers calls, check the mode. I don?t know if this applies to PC FLDIGI. RAY W8LYJ Sent from my iPad From rocketnj at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 16:52:25 2019 From: rocketnj at gmail.com (Dave) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 In-Reply-To: <6d1282ae-de19-66bf-431d-40ffd0d27890@elecraft.com> References: <002e01d4e96d$096c3320$1c449960$@gmail.com> <001a01d4e96f$32a828f0$97f87ad0$@elecraft.com> <3E5DDF01024C4490862828E23BC0A90C@ROYKOEPPEHP> <6d1282ae-de19-66bf-431d-40ffd0d27890@elecraft.com> Message-ID: Thanks Eric (and beta testers)! Dave wo2x Sent from my waxed string and tin cans. > On Apr 2, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote: > > Guys - thanks for the help alpha testing 2.17! > > We should have this up on the website as Beta shortly. > > 73, > Eric > /elecraft.com/ > >> On 4/2/2019 9:24 AM, Roy Koeppe wrote: >> Ditto, Ron! >> >> 73, Roy K6XK >> >> >> Thanks, Ron! >> >> 73 de Dick, K6KR >> >> >> Just installed new Firm-Ware Version 2.17. It has solved all the digital wattmeter anomalies and is working perfectly >> here. I recommend this version for next standard Firm-Ware update. Thank you. 73's >> Ron Durie >> WB4OOA >> Elecraft K-Line >> 704-843-3681 > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rmcgraw at blomand.net Tue Apr 2 17:18:21 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:18:21 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s In-Reply-To: <32D6BA7D-A4B2-48DC-BB75-4D18F71BEBED@gmail.com> References: <32D6BA7D-A4B2-48DC-BB75-4D18F71BEBED@gmail.com> Message-ID: <7C4A7F6A-729E-4D98-A1BD-B4DE41D30D51@blomand.net> FLDIGI working under Windows 10 has no issues using the correct mode for AFSK or PSK. In FLDIGI you should be able to select PKTUSB for PSK mode and PKTLSB for AFSK. Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 2, 2019, at 3:47 PM, Gmail wrote: > > It appears FLDIGI MAC uses USB for RTTY not the standard LSB. Use data A for RTTY. If AFSK is used FlDIGI needs to be in REV mode. > If FLDIGI is not decoding correctly or no one answers calls, check the mode. > I don?t know if this applies to PC FLDIGI. > RAY > W8LYJ > Sent from my iPad > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From anyone1545 at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 19:11:36 2019 From: anyone1545 at gmail.com (Gmail) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:11:36 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s In-Reply-To: <7C4A7F6A-729E-4D98-A1BD-B4DE41D30D51@blomand.net> References: <32D6BA7D-A4B2-48DC-BB75-4D18F71BEBED@gmail.com> <7C4A7F6A-729E-4D98-A1BD-B4DE41D30D51@blomand.net> Message-ID: <1B5E8D95-3ABC-4309-B5A2-7972BFB4B04F@gmail.com> I recommend reading the FLDIGI manual. It states that USB is used for digital modes, including RTTY. The K3 uses USB for Data A and LSB for Data AFSK. In my first contest I was having problems getting reliable decoding and not many responses to my calls. I asked a friend who is an PVRC RTTY expert for help. He monitored my transmission and determined my signal was reversed. He said some operators would see that and change mode to answer me. Enabling Rv (reverse) on the lower FLDIGI control panel solved problem. However my logging software sends a mode command to radio when I select a spot and change frequency and it turns off Rv. A better solution is Data A mode which uses USB. There may be a way to change the FLDIGI RTTY default however I have not found it in the menus. Has anyone found it? Ray W8LYJ Sent from my iPad > On Apr 2, 2019, at 17:18, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > > FLDIGI working under Windows 10 has no issues using the correct mode for AFSK or PSK. > > In FLDIGI you should be able to select PKTUSB for PSK mode and PKTLSB for AFSK. > > > > Bob, K4TAX > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 2, 2019, at 3:47 PM, Gmail wrote: >> >> It appears FLDIGI MAC uses USB for RTTY not the standard LSB. Use data A for RTTY. If AFSK is used FlDIGI needs to be in REV mode. >> If FLDIGI is not decoding correctly or no one answers calls, check the mode. >> I don?t know if this applies to PC FLDIGI. >> RAY >> W8LYJ >> Sent from my iPad >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > From frantz at pwpconsult.com Tue Apr 2 20:16:02 2019 From: frantz at pwpconsult.com (Bill Frantz) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 17:16:02 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s In-Reply-To: <1B5E8D95-3ABC-4309-B5A2-7972BFB4B04F@gmail.com> Message-ID: Does using Reverse on the K3 make it easier to use the logging software spots? 73 Bill AE6JV On 4/2/19 at 4:11 PM, anyone1545 at gmail.com (Gmail) wrote: > I recommend reading the FLDIGI manual. It states that USB is used for > digital modes, including RTTY. The K3 uses USB for Data A and LSB for Data > AFSK. > In my first contest I was having problems getting reliable decoding and not > many responses to my calls. I asked a friend who is an PVRC RTTY expert for > help. He monitored my transmission and determined my signal was reversed. He > said some operators would see that and change mode to answer me. Enabling Rv > (reverse) on the lower FLDIGI control panel solved problem. However my > logging software sends a mode command to radio when I select a spot and > change frequency and it turns off Rv. A better solution is Data A mode which > uses USB. > There may be a way to change the FLDIGI RTTY default however I have not > found it in the menus. Has anyone found it? > Ray > W8LYJ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | If you want total security, go to prison. There you're 408-356-8506 | fed, clothed, given medical care and so on. The only www.pwpconsult.com | thing lacking is freedom. - Dwight D. Eisenhower From n6kr at elecraft.com Tue Apr 2 20:30:54 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 17:30:54 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <325C2885-6269-4805-AC7F-722881C5828B@elecraft.com> According to information available when we added RTTY to the K3, the standard was LSB. So AFSK-A and FSK-D both use LSB. DATA-A and PSK-D both use USB. This is not left to your imagination during operation, because "LSB" or "USB" is shown along with "DATA" in the mode icon area. (This applies to the K3, K3S, KX3, and KX2.) You can use DATA-REVERSE to flip the sideband. On an K3, K3S, or KX3, just hold the ALT switch, and you'll see "REV" appear above "DATA." On a KX2 use the ALT MD menu entry. In FSK-D mode on a K3/K3S you can also reverse the transmit logic polarity; see CONFIG:FSK POL. This would be used with MMTTY (etc.) when driving the FSK hardware input line, as opposed to internal FSK-D operation which uses the keyer paddle or an attached ASCII terminal, e.g. K3 Utility's terminal function. 73, Wayne N6KR > On Apr 2, 2019, at 5:16 PM, Bill Frantz wrote: > > Does using Reverse on the K3 make it easier to use the logging software spots? > > 73 Bill AE6JV > > On 4/2/19 at 4:11 PM, anyone1545 at gmail.com (Gmail) wrote: > >> I recommend reading the FLDIGI manual. It states that USB is used for >> digital modes, including RTTY. The K3 uses USB for Data A and LSB for Data >> AFSK. >> In my first contest I was having problems getting reliable decoding and not >> many responses to my calls. I asked a friend who is an PVRC RTTY expert for >> help. He monitored my transmission and determined my signal was reversed. He >> said some operators would see that and change mode to answer me. Enabling Rv >> (reverse) on the lower FLDIGI control panel solved problem. However my >> logging software sends a mode command to radio when I select a spot and >> change frequency and it turns off Rv. A better solution is Data A mode which >> uses USB. >> There may be a way to change the FLDIGI RTTY default however I have not >> found it in the menus. Has anyone found it? >> Ray >> W8LYJ > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Bill Frantz | If you want total security, go to prison. There you're > 408-356-8506 | fed, clothed, given medical care and so on. The only > www.pwpconsult.com | thing lacking is freedom. - Dwight D. Eisenhower > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jrhallas at optonline.net Tue Apr 2 20:44:10 2019 From: jrhallas at optonline.net (Joel Hallas) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 20:44:10 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 -- Strange speaker problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <00b501d4e9b6$5a2c7650$0e8562f0$@net> Tonight, when I turned on my early (sn 431), but upgraded to current, K3, I was surprised to find I had no speaker audio with either internal or external speaker(s). My first thought was that I had somehow fried the speaker AF amp chip. But then I found that the speaker audio worked fine if the CONFIG were set to SPKR + PH = yes. That would seem to rule out the speaker amp as the problem. Anyone experience this, or have any ideas? Thanks much! Regards, Joel Hallas, W1ZR From wa2lbi at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 20:53:41 2019 From: wa2lbi at gmail.com (Ken Winterling) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 20:53:41 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 -- Strange speaker problem In-Reply-To: <00b501d4e9b6$5a2c7650$0e8562f0$@net> References: <00b501d4e9b6$5a2c7650$0e8562f0$@net> Message-ID: Joel, I don?t own a K3 so I am not familiar with all of the audio output settings but is it possible you have a set of headphones plugged in that is disconnecting the speaker? If not, maybe a dirty headphone jack? Ken WA2LBI On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 20:44 Joel Hallas wrote: > Tonight, when I turned on my early (sn 431), but upgraded to current, K3, I > was surprised to find I had no speaker audio with either internal or > external speaker(s). My first thought was that I had somehow fried the > speaker AF amp chip. But then I found that the speaker audio worked fine if > the CONFIG were set to SPKR + PH = yes. That would seem to rule out the > speaker amp as the problem. > > Anyone experience this, or have any ideas? > > Thanks much! > > Regards, Joel Hallas, W1ZR > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > -- Ken WA2LBI Sent from one of my mobile devices From anyone1545 at gmail.com Tue Apr 2 21:10:10 2019 From: anyone1545 at gmail.com (Gmail) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 21:10:10 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2A701D78-F797-497B-A8E9-DCD9A98B05A5@gmail.com> I was able to turn off logging software mode send so I can use Data A or I could use AFSK with rev. Also it?s possible to change K3 to USB AFSK. it?s not a K3 problem but I thought others might have the issue. Took me a few hours to sort out It all out. I might have more info tomorrow. I need to play with log software rig control config. Ray Sent from my iPad > On Apr 2, 2019, at 20:16, Bill Frantz wrote: > > Does using Reverse on the K3 make it easier to use the logging software spots? > > 73 Bill AE6JV > >> On 4/2/19 at 4:11 PM, anyone1545 at gmail.com (Gmail) wrote: >> >> I recommend reading the FLDIGI manual. It states that USB is used for >> digital modes, including RTTY. The K3 uses USB for Data A and LSB for Data >> AFSK. >> In my first contest I was having problems getting reliable decoding and not >> many responses to my calls. I asked a friend who is an PVRC RTTY expert for >> help. He monitored my transmission and determined my signal was reversed. He >> said some operators would see that and change mode to answer me. Enabling Rv >> (reverse) on the lower FLDIGI control panel solved problem. However my >> logging software sends a mode command to radio when I select a spot and >> change frequency and it turns off Rv. A better solution is Data A mode which >> uses USB. >> There may be a way to change the FLDIGI RTTY default however I have not >> found it in the menus. Has anyone found it? >> Ray >> W8LYJ > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Bill Frantz | If you want total security, go to prison. There you're > 408-356-8506 | fed, clothed, given medical care and so on. The only > www.pwpconsult.com | thing lacking is freedom. - Dwight D. Eisenhower > From hbjr at optilink.us Tue Apr 2 21:11:28 2019 From: hbjr at optilink.us (hbjr at optilink.us) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 21:11:28 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 -- Strange speaker problem In-Reply-To: <00b501d4e9b6$5a2c7650$0e8562f0$@net> References: <00b501d4e9b6$5a2c7650$0e8562f0$@net> Message-ID: <001301d4e9ba$2a9f2a50$7fdd7ef0$@optilink.us> I'm a new K3s owner as of October, but I'll take a stab! I leave phones plugged in to the back of the rig all of the time and an external speaker all of the time. My settings are SPKRS = 2 and SPKR+PH =yes. Hope that helps! Hank K4HYJ -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Joel Hallas Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 8:44 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] K3 -- Strange speaker problem Tonight, when I turned on my early (sn 431), but upgraded to current, K3, I was surprised to find I had no speaker audio with either internal or external speaker(s). My first thought was that I had somehow fried the speaker AF amp chip. But then I found that the speaker audio worked fine if the CONFIG were set to SPKR + PH = yes. That would seem to rule out the speaker amp as the problem. Anyone experience this, or have any ideas? Thanks much! Regards, Joel Hallas, W1ZR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From hbjr at optilink.us Tue Apr 2 22:22:47 2019 From: hbjr at optilink.us (hbjr at optilink.us) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 22:22:47 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] VHF Packet setup K3s/K144XV Message-ID: <005801d4e9c4$2137bdb0$63a73910$@optilink.us> Hey gang. Just double checking my setup. I'm using a PK-232sc+ for sound card modes, FSK RTTY, CW, and PACTOR with my K3s. I recently added the K144XV and since everything is already hooked up, I tried sending packet. After tweaking the AFSK control on the PK for proper deviation and proper ALC, I gave it a shot to the local BBS and it works great! Hit a Winlink gateway or two and used a digipeater for a few more - worked great. My question, is there a "mode" setting to do what I am doing, or will I need to change the MIC input to Line-In every time I want to do FM packet instead of FM voice? Currently that's the only way to make it work. On SSB, changing to data opens the Line-In for data. Just curious for FM. BTW: It is interesting to see the open carrier waveform on the P3 of various 2 meter FM repeaters. Some look "clean" in my opinion and some look "dirty" with no voice modulation even though the dead air sounds the same. I enjoy my K3s setup more every time I use it! Hank K4HYJ From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Tue Apr 2 22:52:27 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:52:27 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 -- Strange speaker problem In-Reply-To: <00b501d4e9b6$5a2c7650$0e8562f0$@net> References: <00b501d4e9b6$5a2c7650$0e8562f0$@net> Message-ID: Hi Joel, It sounds like you have phones plugged in somewhere. The traditional way of wiring rigs is that plugging in phones mutes the speaker (usually they're powered from the same output stage). The K3 has separate output stages for spkr and cans, and the switching is done by logic. Most of us who plug boom mic headsets into the rear panel assign SPKR + PHONES to one of the PF keys -- I use PF2. SPKR+PHONES is a toggle, so it either activates or de-activates muting of the speaker. This is documented in the part of the manual that describes the menu system. 73, Jim K9YC On 4/2/2019 5:44 PM, Joel Hallas wrote: > I > was surprised to find I had no speaker audio with either internal or > external speaker(s). My first thought was that I had somehow fried the > speaker AF amp chip. But then I found that the speaker audio worked fine if > the CONFIG were set to SPKR + PH = yes. That would seem to rule out the > speaker amp as the problem. From ve7xf at shaw.ca Tue Apr 2 23:15:14 2019 From: ve7xf at shaw.ca (Ralph Parker) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 20:15:14 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Strange speaker problem Message-ID: Could it be this? I saved this item from a KE7X post. Worked for a friend with a similar mystery problem - VE7XF ....................................... At one point Elecraft had to change the switch that cuts out speaker audio when the phones are plugged in so there is a setting in CONFIG:SPRK+PH that selects one of two action polarities. Tapping the 1 key toggles between PH.R SW- (inverted) and PH.R SW+. Try changing that. Fred KE7X From lists at subich.com Tue Apr 2 23:16:19 2019 From: lists at subich.com (Joe Subich, W4TV) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 23:16:19 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s In-Reply-To: <32D6BA7D-A4B2-48DC-BB75-4D18F71BEBED@gmail.com> References: <32D6BA7D-A4B2-48DC-BB75-4D18F71BEBED@gmail.com> Message-ID: <96767d0e-b951-1e72-46a6-f62a4d515043@subich.com> Fldigi for the PC operates correctly with the K3 and AFSK_A as long as radio control (CAT) is connected. The software/CAT interface driver properly understands the sideband sense of the connected rig. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2019-04-02 4:47 PM, Gmail wrote: > It appears FLDIGI MAC uses USB for RTTY not the standard LSB. Use data A for RTTY. If AFSK is used FlDIGI needs to be in REV mode. > If FLDIGI is not decoding correctly or no one answers calls, check the mode. > I don?t know if this applies to PC FLDIGI. > RAY > W8LYJ > Sent from my iPad From donwilh at embarqmail.com Wed Apr 3 10:35:20 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:35:20 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Test Message-ID: <0262aae5-605f-c818-155a-733885763ad6@embarqmail.com> I have not seen any posts from the reflector today - quite unusual Don W3FPR From donwilh at embarqmail.com Wed Apr 3 10:38:18 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:38:18 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Test In-Reply-To: <0262aae5-605f-c818-155a-733885763ad6@embarqmail.com> References: <0262aae5-605f-c818-155a-733885763ad6@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <14790603-21f9-2f87-106f-390b000d33d3@embarqmail.com> My post was received. All is apparently OK. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/3/2019 10:35 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > I have not seen any posts from the reflector today - quite unusual > > Don W3FPR > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From kwroberson at yahoo.com Wed Apr 3 10:39:09 2019 From: kwroberson at yahoo.com (Ken Roberson) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 14:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] Test In-Reply-To: <0262aae5-605f-c818-155a-733885763ad6@embarqmail.com> References: <0262aae5-605f-c818-155a-733885763ad6@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <318708968.302712.1554302349194@mail.yahoo.com> Don , Same here - 73 Ken K5DNL On Wednesday, April 3, 2019, 9:37:08 AM CDT, Don Wilhelm wrote: I have not seen any posts from the reflector today - quite unusual Don W3FPR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From kissov at me.com Wed Apr 3 11:51:54 2019 From: kissov at me.com (Richard Thorpe) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 08:51:54 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] April 6th GPS Reset Message-ID: <4B3A3382-B46A-4923-8121-22E5FE48751E@me.com> On April 6th the satellite GPS system is going to be reset, does anyone out there know how this ?reset? will effect the Trimble Thunderbolt that many of us use to ?discipline ? the frequency on our K3 and K3S radios? I?m told that older sat programs will not work after the reset. My Trimble unit was old (surplus) when I purchased it on Ebay years ago. Thanks. R Thorpe K6CG K3,P3, KX3, PX3 From lladerman at earthlink.net Wed Apr 3 12:05:20 2019 From: lladerman at earthlink.net (W0FK) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 09:05:20 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 In-Reply-To: <9259ef42-67c8-cec5-0074-8d5a3ebfb3ce@cox.net> References: <002e01d4e96d$096c3320$1c449960$@gmail.com> <9259ef42-67c8-cec5-0074-8d5a3ebfb3ce@cox.net> Message-ID: <1554307520875-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Jim McCook W6YA wrote > I just spent 20 minutes trying to find 2.17 on the Elecraft KPA1500 > Firmware download area.? Only 2.10 and earlier betas are shown as > available.? I get nowhere with the Utility.? Where is 2.17 hidden?? -Jim Jim, see https://ftp.elecraft.com/KPA1500/firmware/beta/ 73 Lou, W0FK ----- St. Louis, MO "The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From k6dgw at foothill.net Wed Apr 3 12:18:10 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 09:18:10 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] April 6th GPS Reset In-Reply-To: <4B3A3382-B46A-4923-8121-22E5FE48751E@me.com> References: <4B3A3382-B46A-4923-8121-22E5FE48751E@me.com> Message-ID: <07a403ea-2802-e55c-0427-a7c4af77e00f@foothill.net> Not to worry Richard.? GPS has two PR codes on different frequencies.? The "civilian" code repeats every 100 ms. The "military" code repeats every 7 days, and the code is sometimes encrypted.? At the end of the code, a "week number" is incremented by one and the code repeats.? Eventually, the 10-bit register holding the week number will overflow and reset to zero. That's all that's happening, it happens every 1,024 weeks, the first was in Aug 1999. The first time this happened, the much younger Internet was filled with admonitions not to fly between a couple of dates in Aug since airplanes would fall from the sky.? It also hatched several conspiracy theories [of course].? The hubris surrounding GPS Rollover Day had declined some, but as usual, some persists.? It does sound like a good marketing ploy however ... "Get your new Trimble now before GPS resets and your old one quits."? Kind of what Apple and Microsoft do when I think about it.? [:-) 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/3/2019 8:51 AM, Richard Thorpe via Elecraft wrote: > On April 6th the satellite GPS system is going to be reset, does anyone out there know how this ?reset? will effect the Trimble Thunderbolt that many of us use to ?discipline ? the frequency on our K3 and K3S radios? I?m told that older sat programs will not work after the reset. My Trimble unit was old (surplus) when I purchased it on Ebay years ago. Thanks. > > R Thorpe > K6CG K3,P3, KX3, PX3 > From eric at elecraft.com Wed Apr 3 13:45:03 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:45:03 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 In-Reply-To: <1554307520875-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <002e01d4e96d$096c3320$1c449960$@gmail.com> <9259ef42-67c8-cec5-0074-8d5a3ebfb3ce@cox.net> <1554307520875-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Beta releases are not automatically downloadable web to from the utility. The link below will get you directly to the beta download file for 2.17. For full instructions on loading Beta releases, including the link below, see https://elecraft.com/pages/firmware-software and go to the "K-Line Firmware and Software / KPA1500"? tab and scroll down to the beta section. --- *KPA1500 Firmware Release Notes* *02.17 3/31/2019 (Beta 4/2/2019)* ** ?Add Tech Mode PA CURR status page showing PA current to cA resolution ?Icom 160 meter frequency CI-V message was not parsed correctly ?Smooth LCD power and SWR display ?ATU improvements 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 4/3/2019 9:05 AM, W0FK wrote: > Jim McCook W6YA wrote >> I just spent 20 minutes trying to find 2.17 on the Elecraft KPA1500 >> Firmware download area.? Only 2.10 and earlier betas are shown as >> available.? I get nowhere with the Utility.? Where is 2.17 hidden?? -Jim > Jim, see https://ftp.elecraft.com/KPA1500/firmware/beta/ > > 73 > > Lou, W0FK > > > > ----- > St. Louis, MO > > "The difference between stupidity and genius is that > genius has its limits." Albert Einstein > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From na5n at zianet.com Wed Apr 3 14:24:27 2019 From: na5n at zianet.com (na5n at zianet.com) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 12:24:27 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] April 6th GPS Reset In-Reply-To: <07a403ea-2802-e55c-0427-a7c4af77e00f@foothill.net> References: <4B3A3382-B46A-4923-8121-22E5FE48751E@me.com> <07a403ea-2802-e55c-0427-a7c4af77e00f@foothill.net> Message-ID: <20190403182427.85802.qmail@modulo.zianet.com> Fred Jensen writes: > Eventually, the 10-bit register holding the week number will overflow > and reset to zero. That's all that's happening, it happens every 1,024 > weeks, the first was in Aug 1999. The GPS reset has been the source of hysteria in various circles, including exhaustive discussions on the various private pilot and drone forums, since most aircraft and drones use GPS for real time positioning and navigation while in flight. In short, when this happened in 1999, changes were made to lengthen the roll over period to beyond our lifetime. The April 6 rollover only effects older GPS devices with the 10-bit registers. Basically, every GPS embedded device made in the last 10-15 years or so will not be affected - only the first generation devices. There are absolutely no warnings or cautions on the websites for Garmin, Magellan, or Trimble showing it is a non-issue for their GPS devices - not even mentioned. The FAA has a list of the very few GPS devices used in older private aircraft that could be effected, only if in flight when the rollover occurs. With 10,000+ people in the air at any moment, there would be a huge air of caution by the FAA and airlines if the rollover had any chance of effecting the GPS devices now in use. In this case, "Silence is golden." 73, Paul NA5N From k6dgw at foothill.net Wed Apr 3 15:30:25 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:30:25 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] April 6th GPS Reset In-Reply-To: <20190403182427.85802.qmail@modulo.zianet.com> References: <4B3A3382-B46A-4923-8121-22E5FE48751E@me.com> <07a403ea-2802-e55c-0427-a7c4af77e00f@foothill.net> <20190403182427.85802.qmail@modulo.zianet.com> Message-ID: <415673b2-f99c-e300-a032-121dde9f6068@foothill.net> The week number register is in the hardware aboard the GPS satellites, although receivers usually read and store it too.? Each rollover is a "GPS epoch," epoch being a term used by space travelers, astronomers, and other folk dabbling in space-ish things to confuse the rest of us.? The first epoch ended in Aug 1999 ... 1024 weeks is 19. years.? We are approaching the end of epoch 2.? In 1999, a few of the early GPS receivers hit the WNRO [week number roll over] and thought it had become 1980 again.? Using a GPS receiver to discipline the K3 involves the clock signal and unless you are using your very very old receiver to tell you what the current date is, the WNRO will have no effect. Early in the first GPS epoch, it was discovered that the "civilian" signal was yielding somewhat better accuracy than the US Dept. of Defense had planned, and they implemented SA or Selective Availability to perturb the satellite clocks making it appear that you were moving around randomly in a 100-200 m area when you were in fact stationary.? This would affect the clock signal at the receivers and thus the "discipline" applied to the K3. It wasn't very long before a number of entities, including manufacturers and the US Coast Guard ... found ways to get around SA.? One is Differential GPS which places stations at very carefully surveyed locations, monitors their GPS reported positions, and transmits the errors.? The DGPS receiver uses the errors to correct its own GPS position.? If you have the new synthesizer for your K3 [or a K3s], you can hear and decode the DGPS signals, they're 100 bps MSK in the 284-458 KHz range and have a distinctive signature on a P3.? The US DoD gave up on SA long ago but the DGPS stations remain, or at least did the last time I checked. One GPS conspiracy theory posited that there was a "back door" into the satellites put there by another country [which we'll leave nameless] which, when activated, would be used to cause all the aircraft in the air to converge on one point and create a great conflagration.? Conspiracy theories have a half-life and fortunately this one was fairly short, similar to the half-life of disco and leisure suits. [:-) 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/3/2019 11:24 AM, na5n at zianet.com wrote: > Fred Jensen writes: > >> Eventually, the 10-bit register holding the week number will overflow >> and reset to zero. That's all that's happening, it happens every >> 1,024 weeks, the first was in Aug 1999. > > The GPS reset has been the source of hysteria in various circles, > including exhaustive discussions on the various private pilot and > drone forums, since most aircraft and drones use GPS for real time > positioning and navigation while in flight. > > In short, when this happened in 1999, changes were made to lengthen > the roll over period to beyond our lifetime.? The April 6 rollover > only effects older GPS devices with the 10-bit registers.? Basically, > every GPS embedded device made in the last 10-15 years or so will not > be affected - only the first generation devices. > > There are absolutely no warnings or cautions on the websites for > Garmin, Magellan, or Trimble showing it is a non-issue for their GPS > devices - not even mentioned.? The FAA has a list of the very few GPS > devices used in older private aircraft that could be effected, only if > in flight when the rollover occurs.? With 10,000+ people in the air at > any moment, there would be a huge air of caution by the FAA and > airlines if the rollover had any chance of effecting the GPS devices > now in use.? In this case, "Silence is golden." > > 73, Paul NA5N > From alaparos at w2cs.net Wed Apr 3 15:40:29 2019 From: alaparos at w2cs.net (Gary J Ferdinand) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 15:40:29 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 F/W 2.17 Install Hang Message-ID: Not my first rodeo, but I must have fouled something up. I have the 2.17 folder (containing the .hex and .rtf files) in the local folder for the KPA1500 utility. The utility says it can talk to the amp. I tell it to download the files. I get the usual firmware download window, but it hangs on the ?Verifying file ?kpa1500fw217.hex? message. The hang has lasted over 20 minutes now before I did a Force Quit. Suggestions? 73/Gary W2CS From alaparos at w2cs.net Wed Apr 3 15:43:30 2019 From: alaparos at w2cs.net (Gary J Ferdinand) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 15:43:30 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Fwd: KPA1500 F/W 2.17 Install Hang References: Message-ID: Never mind. While the reboot of macOS did nothing, cycling the amp off then on seems to have gotten by the verification hang. Firmware installed successfully. 73/Gary W2CS > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Gary J Ferdinand > Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 F/W 2.17 Install Hang > Date: April 3, 2019 at 3:40:29 PM EDT > To: elecraft > > Not my first rodeo, but I must have fouled something up. I have the 2.17 folder (containing the .hex and .rtf files) in the local folder for the KPA1500 utility. The utility says it can talk to the amp. I tell it to download the files. I get the usual firmware download window, but it hangs on the ?Verifying file ?kpa1500fw217.hex? message. The hang has lasted over 20 minutes now before I did a Force Quit. > > Suggestions? > > 73/Gary W2CS > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From kissov at me.com Wed Apr 3 15:48:49 2019 From: kissov at me.com (Richard Thorpe) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:48:49 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] April 6th GPS Reset Message-ID: <79DD5DB6-9B7B-4731-9EFB-83DD50982DE1@me.com> Thank you Skip K6DGW and Paul NA5N for your reply. I now can rest assured that my K3 will keep the discipline it needs. Richard K6CG From dashiellplanning at outlook.com Wed Apr 3 16:53:25 2019 From: dashiellplanning at outlook.com (Eugene Dashiell) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 20:53:25 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] GPS DGPS USCG Beacon system being shut down In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: My understanding is that the USCG Beacon system is being shut down. Too bad for us in the Pacific because the beacons provide a good 2 meter accuracy, whereas the WAAS system out here is not as good as on the continent. Gene Dashiell KH6XJ ________________________________ From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of elecraft-request at mailman.qth.net Sent: Wednesday, April 3, 2019 9:30 AM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Elecraft Digest, Vol 180, Issue 3 Send Elecraft mailing list submissions to elecraft at mailman.qth.net To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to elecraft-request at mailman.qth.net You can reach the person managing the list at elecraft-owner at mailman.qth.net When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Elecraft digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Re: KPA1500 v. 2.17 (Rick WA6NHC) 2. AlexLoop FS (Niel Skousen) 3. FOR SALE: Complete K3/P3 Station (Philip L. Graitcer) 4. Re: KPA1500 v. 2.17 (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) 5. FLDIGI with K3s (Gmail) 6. Re: KPA1500 v. 2.17 (Dave) 7. Re: FLDIGI with K3s (Bob McGraw K4TAX) 8. Re: FLDIGI with K3s (Gmail) 9. Re: FLDIGI with K3s (Bill Frantz) 10. Re: FLDIGI with K3s (Wayne Burdick) 11. K3 -- Strange speaker problem (Joel Hallas) 12. Re: K3 -- Strange speaker problem (Ken Winterling) 13. Re: FLDIGI with K3s (Gmail) 14. Re: K3 -- Strange speaker problem (hbjr at optilink.us) 15. VHF Packet setup K3s/K144XV (hbjr at optilink.us) 16. Re: K3 -- Strange speaker problem (Jim Brown) 17. Re: Strange speaker problem (Ralph Parker) 18. Re: FLDIGI with K3s (Joe Subich, W4TV) 19. Test (Don Wilhelm) 20. Re: Test (Don Wilhelm) 21. Re: Test (Ken Roberson) 22. April 6th GPS Reset (Richard Thorpe) 23. Re: KPA1500 v. 2.17 (W0FK) 24. Re: April 6th GPS Reset (Fred Jensen) 25. Re: KPA1500 v. 2.17 (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) 26. Re: April 6th GPS Reset (na5n at zianet.com) 27. Re: April 6th GPS Reset (Fred Jensen) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:27:36 -0700 From: Rick WA6NHC To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 Message-ID: <7c729796-affe-f9f7-3961-7c931496773a at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Beta testers only, be patient; that note was to the wrong list. (no, I'm not one, just waiting like you). Rick nhc On 4/2/2019 12:11 PM, Jim McCook wrote: > I just spent 20 minutes trying to find 2.17 on the Elecraft KPA1500 > Firmware download area.? Only 2.10 and earlier betas are shown as > available.? I get nowhere with the Utility.? Where is 2.17 hidden?? -Jim > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 14:30:10 -0600 From: Niel Skousen To: qrp-l at mailman.qth.net, Elecraft Reflector Subject: [Elecraft] AlexLoop FS Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Good Afternoon Gang, I am selling my AlexLoop with a small camera tripod. will ship today or tomorrow, or after 4/15/19 (out of town on vacation) Asking $325 conus, + actual freight for other shipping requests. Niel WA7SSA ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:42:26 -0400 From: Philip L. Graitcer To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] FOR SALE: Complete K3/P3 Station Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I need to make room in the shack?. K3/100 100 watt 160-6 meter transceiver SN7120, purchased January 2013 for $2249.95, factory-built with following options: -KAT-3 Antenna Tuner $339.95 -KPFLA3A -550 500hZ 5 pole filter $89.95 -KBF3 General Coverage BPF $159.95 In January 2017, this K3 was upgraded by Elecraft to have these K3S features: -KIOB Upgrade (sound car, audio interface) $389.95 -KXV3B-F XOUT/XINT transverter interface $199.95 -KSYN3A UPGD-F synthesizer board upgrade $219.95 -Neoprene Soft Grip VFO A tuning knob $16.95 -CABLP3Y Adapter Cable $29.95 At that time, the K3 was factory calibrated and aligned and ?meets or exceeds all factory specifications.? Elecraft P3 Panadapter SN820 purchased used for $650. -P3SVGA Video Adapter $289.95 installed by me Both units are cosmetically perfect, from non-smoking environment, always in shack. I am original owner of K3. I have manuals, Elecraft invoices, custom covers for both, the handheld microphone, and the original box for the K3. I would like to sell the entire package. $2900, includes shipping in US Phil, W3HZZ ------------------------------ Message: 4 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 13:44:31 -0700 From: "Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft" To: Roy Koeppe , Elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 Message-ID: <6d1282ae-de19-66bf-431d-40ffd0d27890 at elecraft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Guys - thanks for the help alpha testing 2.17! We should have this up on the website as Beta shortly. 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 4/2/2019 9:24 AM, Roy Koeppe wrote: > Ditto, Ron! > > 73,?? Roy??? K6XK > > > Thanks, Ron! > > 73 de Dick, K6KR > > > Just installed new Firm-Ware Version 2.17.? It has solved all the digital > wattmeter anomalies and is working perfectly > here.? I recommend this version for next standard Firm-Ware update.? Thank > you.? 73's > Ron Durie > WB4OOA > Elecraft K-Line > 704-843-3681 ------------------------------ Message: 5 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:47:20 -0400 From: Gmail To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s Message-ID: <32D6BA7D-A4B2-48DC-BB75-4D18F71BEBED at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 It appears FLDIGI MAC uses USB for RTTY not the standard LSB. Use data A for RTTY. If AFSK is used FlDIGI needs to be in REV mode. If FLDIGI is not decoding correctly or no one answers calls, check the mode. I don?t know if this applies to PC FLDIGI. RAY W8LYJ Sent from my iPad ------------------------------ Message: 6 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:52:25 -0400 From: Dave To: "Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft" Cc: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Thanks Eric (and beta testers)! Dave wo2x Sent from my waxed string and tin cans. > On Apr 2, 2019, at 4:44 PM, Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft wrote: > > Guys - thanks for the help alpha testing 2.17! > > We should have this up on the website as Beta shortly. > > 73, > Eric > /elecraft.com/ > >> On 4/2/2019 9:24 AM, Roy Koeppe wrote: >> Ditto, Ron! >> >> 73, Roy K6XK >> >> >> Thanks, Ron! >> >> 73 de Dick, K6KR >> >> >> Just installed new Firm-Ware Version 2.17. It has solved all the digital wattmeter anomalies and is working perfectly >> here. I recommend this version for next standard Firm-Ware update. Thank you. 73's >> Ron Durie >> WB4OOA >> Elecraft K-Line >> 704-843-3681 > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ------------------------------ Message: 7 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:18:21 -0500 From: Bob McGraw K4TAX To: Gmail Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s Message-ID: <7C4A7F6A-729E-4D98-A1BD-B4DE41D30D51 at blomand.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 FLDIGI working under Windows 10 has no issues using the correct mode for AFSK or PSK. In FLDIGI you should be able to select PKTUSB for PSK mode and PKTLSB for AFSK. Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 2, 2019, at 3:47 PM, Gmail wrote: > > It appears FLDIGI MAC uses USB for RTTY not the standard LSB. Use data A for RTTY. If AFSK is used FlDIGI needs to be in REV mode. > If FLDIGI is not decoding correctly or no one answers calls, check the mode. > I don?t know if this applies to PC FLDIGI. > RAY > W8LYJ > Sent from my iPad > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ------------------------------ Message: 8 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:11:36 -0400 From: Gmail To: Bob McGraw K4TAX Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s Message-ID: <1B5E8D95-3ABC-4309-B5A2-7972BFB4B04F at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I recommend reading the FLDIGI manual. It states that USB is used for digital modes, including RTTY. The K3 uses USB for Data A and LSB for Data AFSK. In my first contest I was having problems getting reliable decoding and not many responses to my calls. I asked a friend who is an PVRC RTTY expert for help. He monitored my transmission and determined my signal was reversed. He said some operators would see that and change mode to answer me. Enabling Rv (reverse) on the lower FLDIGI control panel solved problem. However my logging software sends a mode command to radio when I select a spot and change frequency and it turns off Rv. A better solution is Data A mode which uses USB. There may be a way to change the FLDIGI RTTY default however I have not found it in the menus. Has anyone found it? Ray W8LYJ Sent from my iPad > On Apr 2, 2019, at 17:18, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > > FLDIGI working under Windows 10 has no issues using the correct mode for AFSK or PSK. > > In FLDIGI you should be able to select PKTUSB for PSK mode and PKTLSB for AFSK. > > > > Bob, K4TAX > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 2, 2019, at 3:47 PM, Gmail wrote: >> >> It appears FLDIGI MAC uses USB for RTTY not the standard LSB. Use data A for RTTY. If AFSK is used FlDIGI needs to be in REV mode. >> If FLDIGI is not decoding correctly or no one answers calls, check the mode. >> I don?t know if this applies to PC FLDIGI. >> RAY >> W8LYJ >> Sent from my iPad >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ------------------------------ Message: 9 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 17:16:02 -0700 From: Bill Frantz To: Gmail Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Does using Reverse on the K3 make it easier to use the logging software spots? 73 Bill AE6JV On 4/2/19 at 4:11 PM, anyone1545 at gmail.com (Gmail) wrote: > I recommend reading the FLDIGI manual. It states that USB is used for > digital modes, including RTTY. The K3 uses USB for Data A and LSB for Data > AFSK. > In my first contest I was having problems getting reliable decoding and not > many responses to my calls. I asked a friend who is an PVRC RTTY expert for > help. He monitored my transmission and determined my signal was reversed. He > said some operators would see that and change mode to answer me. Enabling Rv > (reverse) on the lower FLDIGI control panel solved problem. However my > logging software sends a mode command to radio when I select a spot and > change frequency and it turns off Rv. A better solution is Data A mode which > uses USB. > There may be a way to change the FLDIGI RTTY default however I have not > found it in the menus. Has anyone found it? > Ray > W8LYJ --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | If you want total security, go to prison. There you're 408-356-8506 | fed, clothed, given medical care and so on. The only www.pwpconsult.com | thing lacking is freedom. - Dwight D. Eisenhower ------------------------------ Message: 10 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 17:30:54 -0700 From: Wayne Burdick To: Bill Frantz Cc: Elecraft Reflector , Gmail Subject: Re: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s Message-ID: <325C2885-6269-4805-AC7F-722881C5828B at elecraft.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii According to information available when we added RTTY to the K3, the standard was LSB. So AFSK-A and FSK-D both use LSB. DATA-A and PSK-D both use USB. This is not left to your imagination during operation, because "LSB" or "USB" is shown along with "DATA" in the mode icon area. (This applies to the K3, K3S, KX3, and KX2.) You can use DATA-REVERSE to flip the sideband. On an K3, K3S, or KX3, just hold the ALT switch, and you'll see "REV" appear above "DATA." On a KX2 use the ALT MD menu entry. In FSK-D mode on a K3/K3S you can also reverse the transmit logic polarity; see CONFIG:FSK POL. This would be used with MMTTY (etc.) when driving the FSK hardware input line, as opposed to internal FSK-D operation which uses the keyer paddle or an attached ASCII terminal, e.g. K3 Utility's terminal function. 73, Wayne N6KR > On Apr 2, 2019, at 5:16 PM, Bill Frantz wrote: > > Does using Reverse on the K3 make it easier to use the logging software spots? > > 73 Bill AE6JV > > On 4/2/19 at 4:11 PM, anyone1545 at gmail.com (Gmail) wrote: > >> I recommend reading the FLDIGI manual. It states that USB is used for >> digital modes, including RTTY. The K3 uses USB for Data A and LSB for Data >> AFSK. >> In my first contest I was having problems getting reliable decoding and not >> many responses to my calls. I asked a friend who is an PVRC RTTY expert for >> help. He monitored my transmission and determined my signal was reversed. He >> said some operators would see that and change mode to answer me. Enabling Rv >> (reverse) on the lower FLDIGI control panel solved problem. However my >> logging software sends a mode command to radio when I select a spot and >> change frequency and it turns off Rv. A better solution is Data A mode which >> uses USB. >> There may be a way to change the FLDIGI RTTY default however I have not >> found it in the menus. Has anyone found it? >> Ray >> W8LYJ > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Bill Frantz | If you want total security, go to prison. There you're > 408-356-8506 | fed, clothed, given medical care and so on. The only > www.pwpconsult.com | thing lacking is freedom. - Dwight D. Eisenhower > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ------------------------------ Message: 11 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 20:44:10 -0400 From: "Joel Hallas" To: Subject: [Elecraft] K3 -- Strange speaker problem Message-ID: <00b501d4e9b6$5a2c7650$0e8562f0$@net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Tonight, when I turned on my early (sn 431), but upgraded to current, K3, I was surprised to find I had no speaker audio with either internal or external speaker(s). My first thought was that I had somehow fried the speaker AF amp chip. But then I found that the speaker audio worked fine if the CONFIG were set to SPKR + PH = yes. That would seem to rule out the speaker amp as the problem. Anyone experience this, or have any ideas? Thanks much! Regards, Joel Hallas, W1ZR ------------------------------ Message: 12 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 20:53:41 -0400 From: Ken Winterling To: Joel Hallas Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 -- Strange speaker problem Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Joel, I don?t own a K3 so I am not familiar with all of the audio output settings but is it possible you have a set of headphones plugged in that is disconnecting the speaker? If not, maybe a dirty headphone jack? Ken WA2LBI On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 20:44 Joel Hallas wrote: > Tonight, when I turned on my early (sn 431), but upgraded to current, K3, I > was surprised to find I had no speaker audio with either internal or > external speaker(s). My first thought was that I had somehow fried the > speaker AF amp chip. But then I found that the speaker audio worked fine if > the CONFIG were set to SPKR + PH = yes. That would seem to rule out the > speaker amp as the problem. > > Anyone experience this, or have any ideas? > > Thanks much! > > Regards, Joel Hallas, W1ZR > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > -- Ken WA2LBI Sent from one of my mobile devices ------------------------------ Message: 13 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 21:10:10 -0400 From: Gmail To: Bill Frantz Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s Message-ID: <2A701D78-F797-497B-A8E9-DCD9A98B05A5 at gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I was able to turn off logging software mode send so I can use Data A or I could use AFSK with rev. Also it?s possible to change K3 to USB AFSK. it?s not a K3 problem but I thought others might have the issue. Took me a few hours to sort out It all out. I might have more info tomorrow. I need to play with log software rig control config. Ray Sent from my iPad > On Apr 2, 2019, at 20:16, Bill Frantz wrote: > > Does using Reverse on the K3 make it easier to use the logging software spots? > > 73 Bill AE6JV > >> On 4/2/19 at 4:11 PM, anyone1545 at gmail.com (Gmail) wrote: >> >> I recommend reading the FLDIGI manual. It states that USB is used for >> digital modes, including RTTY. The K3 uses USB for Data A and LSB for Data >> AFSK. >> In my first contest I was having problems getting reliable decoding and not >> many responses to my calls. I asked a friend who is an PVRC RTTY expert for >> help. He monitored my transmission and determined my signal was reversed. He >> said some operators would see that and change mode to answer me. Enabling Rv >> (reverse) on the lower FLDIGI control panel solved problem. However my >> logging software sends a mode command to radio when I select a spot and >> change frequency and it turns off Rv. A better solution is Data A mode which >> uses USB. >> There may be a way to change the FLDIGI RTTY default however I have not >> found it in the menus. Has anyone found it? >> Ray >> W8LYJ > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Bill Frantz | If you want total security, go to prison. There you're > 408-356-8506 | fed, clothed, given medical care and so on. The only > www.pwpconsult.com | thing lacking is freedom. - Dwight D. Eisenhower > ------------------------------ Message: 14 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 21:11:28 -0400 From: To: "'Joel Hallas'" , Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 -- Strange speaker problem Message-ID: <001301d4e9ba$2a9f2a50$7fdd7ef0$@optilink.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" I'm a new K3s owner as of October, but I'll take a stab! I leave phones plugged in to the back of the rig all of the time and an external speaker all of the time. My settings are SPKRS = 2 and SPKR+PH =yes. Hope that helps! Hank K4HYJ -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Joel Hallas Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 8:44 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] K3 -- Strange speaker problem Tonight, when I turned on my early (sn 431), but upgraded to current, K3, I was surprised to find I had no speaker audio with either internal or external speaker(s). My first thought was that I had somehow fried the speaker AF amp chip. But then I found that the speaker audio worked fine if the CONFIG were set to SPKR + PH = yes. That would seem to rule out the speaker amp as the problem. Anyone experience this, or have any ideas? Thanks much! Regards, Joel Hallas, W1ZR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 22:22:47 -0400 From: To: Subject: [Elecraft] VHF Packet setup K3s/K144XV Message-ID: <005801d4e9c4$2137bdb0$63a73910$@optilink.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hey gang. Just double checking my setup. I'm using a PK-232sc+ for sound card modes, FSK RTTY, CW, and PACTOR with my K3s. I recently added the K144XV and since everything is already hooked up, I tried sending packet. After tweaking the AFSK control on the PK for proper deviation and proper ALC, I gave it a shot to the local BBS and it works great! Hit a Winlink gateway or two and used a digipeater for a few more - worked great. My question, is there a "mode" setting to do what I am doing, or will I need to change the MIC input to Line-In every time I want to do FM packet instead of FM voice? Currently that's the only way to make it work. On SSB, changing to data opens the Line-In for data. Just curious for FM. BTW: It is interesting to see the open carrier waveform on the P3 of various 2 meter FM repeaters. Some look "clean" in my opinion and some look "dirty" with no voice modulation even though the dead air sounds the same. I enjoy my K3s setup more every time I use it! Hank K4HYJ ------------------------------ Message: 16 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 19:52:27 -0700 From: Jim Brown To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 -- Strange speaker problem Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Hi Joel, It sounds like you have phones plugged in somewhere. The traditional way of wiring rigs is that plugging in phones mutes the speaker (usually they're powered from the same output stage). The K3 has separate output stages for spkr and cans, and the switching is done by logic. Most of us who plug boom mic headsets into the rear panel assign SPKR + PHONES to one of the PF keys -- I use PF2. SPKR+PHONES is a toggle, so it either activates or de-activates muting of the speaker. This is documented in the part of the manual that describes the menu system. 73, Jim K9YC On 4/2/2019 5:44 PM, Joel Hallas wrote: > I > was surprised to find I had no speaker audio with either internal or > external speaker(s). My first thought was that I had somehow fried the > speaker AF amp chip. But then I found that the speaker audio worked fine if > the CONFIG were set to SPKR + PH = yes. That would seem to rule out the > speaker amp as the problem. ------------------------------ Message: 17 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 20:15:14 -0700 From: Ralph Parker To: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Strange speaker problem Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Could it be this? I saved this item from a KE7X post. Worked for a friend with a similar mystery problem - VE7XF ....................................... At one point Elecraft had to change the switch that cuts out speaker audio when the phones are plugged in so there is a setting in CONFIG:SPRK+PH that selects one of two action polarities. Tapping the 1 key toggles between PH.R SW- (inverted) and PH.R SW+. Try changing that. Fred KE7X ------------------------------ Message: 18 Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 23:16:19 -0400 From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" To: Elecraft Subject: Re: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s Message-ID: <96767d0e-b951-1e72-46a6-f62a4d515043 at subich.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Fldigi for the PC operates correctly with the K3 and AFSK_A as long as radio control (CAT) is connected. The software/CAT interface driver properly understands the sideband sense of the connected rig. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2019-04-02 4:47 PM, Gmail wrote: > It appears FLDIGI MAC uses USB for RTTY not the standard LSB. Use data A for RTTY. If AFSK is used FlDIGI needs to be in REV mode. > If FLDIGI is not decoding correctly or no one answers calls, check the mode. > I don?t know if this applies to PC FLDIGI. > RAY > W8LYJ > Sent from my iPad ------------------------------ Message: 19 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:35:20 -0400 From: Don Wilhelm To: "Elecraft at mailman.qth.net" Subject: [Elecraft] Test Message-ID: <0262aae5-605f-c818-155a-733885763ad6 at embarqmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed I have not seen any posts from the reflector today - quite unusual Don W3FPR ------------------------------ Message: 20 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:38:18 -0400 From: Don Wilhelm To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Test Message-ID: <14790603-21f9-2f87-106f-390b000d33d3 at embarqmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed My post was received. All is apparently OK. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/3/2019 10:35 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > I have not seen any posts from the reflector today - quite unusual > > Don W3FPR > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ------------------------------ Message: 21 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 14:39:09 +0000 (UTC) From: Ken Roberson To: "Elecraft at mailman.qth.net" , Don Wilhelm Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Test Message-ID: <318708968.302712.1554302349194 at mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Don , Same here - 73 Ken K5DNL On Wednesday, April 3, 2019, 9:37:08 AM CDT, Don Wilhelm wrote: I have not seen any posts from the reflector today - quite unusual Don W3FPR ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ------------------------------ Message: 22 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 08:51:54 -0700 From: Richard Thorpe To: Elecraft List Subject: [Elecraft] April 6th GPS Reset Message-ID: <4B3A3382-B46A-4923-8121-22E5FE48751E at me.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On April 6th the satellite GPS system is going to be reset, does anyone out there know how this ?reset? will effect the Trimble Thunderbolt that many of us use to ?discipline ? the frequency on our K3 and K3S radios? I?m told that older sat programs will not work after the reset. My Trimble unit was old (surplus) when I purchased it on Ebay years ago. Thanks. R Thorpe K6CG K3,P3, KX3, PX3 ------------------------------ Message: 23 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 09:05:20 -0700 (MST) From: W0FK To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 Message-ID: <1554307520875-0.post at n2.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Jim McCook W6YA wrote > I just spent 20 minutes trying to find 2.17 on the Elecraft KPA1500 > Firmware download area.? Only 2.10 and earlier betas are shown as > available.? I get nowhere with the Utility.? Where is 2.17 hidden?? -Jim Jim, see https://ftp.elecraft.com/KPA1500/firmware/beta/ 73 Lou, W0FK ----- St. Louis, MO "The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ ------------------------------ Message: 24 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 09:18:10 -0700 From: Fred Jensen To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] April 6th GPS Reset Message-ID: <07a403ea-2802-e55c-0427-a7c4af77e00f at foothill.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Not to worry Richard.? GPS has two PR codes on different frequencies.? The "civilian" code repeats every 100 ms. The "military" code repeats every 7 days, and the code is sometimes encrypted.? At the end of the code, a "week number" is incremented by one and the code repeats.? Eventually, the 10-bit register holding the week number will overflow and reset to zero. That's all that's happening, it happens every 1,024 weeks, the first was in Aug 1999. The first time this happened, the much younger Internet was filled with admonitions not to fly between a couple of dates in Aug since airplanes would fall from the sky.? It also hatched several conspiracy theories [of course].? The hubris surrounding GPS Rollover Day had declined some, but as usual, some persists.? It does sound like a good marketing ploy however ... "Get your new Trimble now before GPS resets and your old one quits."? Kind of what Apple and Microsoft do when I think about it.? [:-) 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/3/2019 8:51 AM, Richard Thorpe via Elecraft wrote: > On April 6th the satellite GPS system is going to be reset, does anyone out there know how this ?reset? will effect the Trimble Thunderbolt that many of us use to ?discipline ? the frequency on our K3 and K3S radios? I?m told that older sat programs will not work after the reset. My Trimble unit was old (surplus) when I purchased it on Ebay years ago. Thanks. > > R Thorpe > K6CG K3,P3, KX3, PX3 > ------------------------------ Message: 25 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 10:45:03 -0700 From: "Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft" To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA1500 v. 2.17 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Beta releases are not automatically downloadable web to from the utility. The link below will get you directly to the beta download file for 2.17. For full instructions on loading Beta releases, including the link below, see https://elecraft.com/pages/firmware-software and go to the "K-Line Firmware and Software / KPA1500"? tab and scroll down to the beta section. --- *KPA1500 Firmware Release Notes* *02.17 3/31/2019 (Beta 4/2/2019)* ** ?Add Tech Mode PA CURR status page showing PA current to cA resolution ?Icom 160 meter frequency CI-V message was not parsed correctly ?Smooth LCD power and SWR display ?ATU improvements 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 4/3/2019 9:05 AM, W0FK wrote: > Jim McCook W6YA wrote >> I just spent 20 minutes trying to find 2.17 on the Elecraft KPA1500 >> Firmware download area.? Only 2.10 and earlier betas are shown as >> available.? I get nowhere with the Utility.? Where is 2.17 hidden?? -Jim > Jim, see https://ftp.elecraft.com/KPA1500/firmware/beta/ > > 73 > > Lou, W0FK > > > > ----- > St. Louis, MO > > "The difference between stupidity and genius is that > genius has its limits." Albert Einstein > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ------------------------------ Message: 26 Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 12:24:27 -0600 From: na5n at zianet.com To: Fred Jensen Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] April 6th GPS Reset Message-ID: <20190403182427.85802.qmail at modulo.zianet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset="utf-8" Fred Jensen writes: > Eventually, the 10-bit register holding the week number will overflow > and reset to zero. That's all that's happening, it happens every 1,024 > weeks, the first was in Aug 1999. The GPS reset has been the source of hysteria in various circles, including exhaustive discussions on the various private pilot and drone forums, since most aircraft and drones use GPS for real time positioning and navigation while in flight. In short, when this happened in 1999, changes were made to lengthen the roll over period to beyond our lifetime. The April 6 rollover only effects older GPS devices with the 10-bit registers. Basically, every GPS embedded device made in the last 10-15 years or so will not be affected - only the first generation devices. There are absolutely no warnings or cautions on the websites for Garmin, Magellan, or Trimble showing it is a non-issue for their GPS devices - not even mentioned. The FAA has a list of the very few GPS devices used in older private aircraft that could be effected, only if in flight when the rollover occurs. With 10,000+ people in the air at any moment, there would be a huge air of caution by the FAA and airlines if the rollover had any chance of effecting the GPS devices now in use. In this case, "Silence is golden." 73, Paul NA5N ------------------------------ Message: 27 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 12:30:25 -0700 From: Fred Jensen To: na5n at zianet.com Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] April 6th GPS Reset Message-ID: <415673b2-f99c-e300-a032-121dde9f6068 at foothill.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed The week number register is in the hardware aboard the GPS satellites, although receivers usually read and store it too.? Each rollover is a "GPS epoch," epoch being a term used by space travelers, astronomers, and other folk dabbling in space-ish things to confuse the rest of us.? The first epoch ended in Aug 1999 ... 1024 weeks is 19. years.? We are approaching the end of epoch 2.? In 1999, a few of the early GPS receivers hit the WNRO [week number roll over] and thought it had become 1980 again.? Using a GPS receiver to discipline the K3 involves the clock signal and unless you are using your very very old receiver to tell you what the current date is, the WNRO will have no effect. Early in the first GPS epoch, it was discovered that the "civilian" signal was yielding somewhat better accuracy than the US Dept. of Defense had planned, and they implemented SA or Selective Availability to perturb the satellite clocks making it appear that you were moving around randomly in a 100-200 m area when you were in fact stationary.? This would affect the clock signal at the receivers and thus the "discipline" applied to the K3. It wasn't very long before a number of entities, including manufacturers and the US Coast Guard ... found ways to get around SA.? One is Differential GPS which places stations at very carefully surveyed locations, monitors their GPS reported positions, and transmits the errors.? The DGPS receiver uses the errors to correct its own GPS position.? If you have the new synthesizer for your K3 [or a K3s], you can hear and decode the DGPS signals, they're 100 bps MSK in the 284-458 KHz range and have a distinctive signature on a P3.? The US DoD gave up on SA long ago but the DGPS stations remain, or at least did the last time I checked. One GPS conspiracy theory posited that there was a "back door" into the satellites put there by another country [which we'll leave nameless] which, when activated, would be used to cause all the aircraft in the air to converge on one point and create a great conflagration.? Conspiracy theories have a half-life and fortunately this one was fairly short, similar to the half-life of disco and leisure suits. [:-) 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/3/2019 11:24 AM, na5n at zianet.com wrote: > Fred Jensen writes: > >> Eventually, the 10-bit register holding the week number will overflow >> and reset to zero. That's all that's happening, it happens every >> 1,024 weeks, the first was in Aug 1999. > > The GPS reset has been the source of hysteria in various circles, > including exhaustive discussions on the various private pilot and > drone forums, since most aircraft and drones use GPS for real time > positioning and navigation while in flight. > > In short, when this happened in 1999, changes were made to lengthen > the roll over period to beyond our lifetime.? The April 6 rollover > only effects older GPS devices with the 10-bit registers.? Basically, > every GPS embedded device made in the last 10-15 years or so will not > be affected - only the first generation devices. > > There are absolutely no warnings or cautions on the websites for > Garmin, Magellan, or Trimble showing it is a non-issue for their GPS > devices - not even mentioned.? The FAA has a list of the very few GPS > devices used in older private aircraft that could be effected, only if > in flight when the rollover occurs.? With 10,000+ people in the air at > any moment, there would be a huge air of caution by the FAA and > airlines if the rollover had any chance of effecting the GPS devices > now in use.? In this case, "Silence is golden." > > 73, Paul NA5N > ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft You must be a subscriber to post. Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com End of Elecraft Digest, Vol 180, Issue 3 **************************************** From dave at nk7z.net Wed Apr 3 17:28:19 2019 From: dave at nk7z.net (Dave Cole (NK7Z)) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 14:28:19 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] April 6th GPS Reset In-Reply-To: <415673b2-f99c-e300-a032-121dde9f6068@foothill.net> References: <4B3A3382-B46A-4923-8121-22E5FE48751E@me.com> <07a403ea-2802-e55c-0427-a7c4af77e00f@foothill.net> <20190403182427.85802.qmail@modulo.zianet.com> <415673b2-f99c-e300-a032-121dde9f6068@foothill.net> Message-ID: How is HAARP involved in this conspiracy, it must be! 73s and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Technical Specialist ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL OOC for Oregon On 4/3/19 12:30 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: > The week number register is in the hardware aboard the GPS satellites, > although receivers usually read and store it too.? Each rollover is a > "GPS epoch," epoch being a term used by space travelers, astronomers, > and other folk dabbling in space-ish things to confuse the rest of us. > The first epoch ended in Aug 1999 ... 1024 weeks is 19. years. > We are approaching the end of epoch 2.? In 1999, a few of the early GPS > receivers hit the WNRO [week number roll over] and thought it had become > 1980 again.? Using a GPS receiver to discipline the K3 involves the > clock signal and unless you are using your very very old receiver to > tell you what the current date is, the WNRO will have no effect. > > Early in the first GPS epoch, it was discovered that the "civilian" > signal was yielding somewhat better accuracy than the US Dept. of > Defense had planned, and they implemented SA or Selective Availability > to perturb the satellite clocks making it appear that you were moving > around randomly in a 100-200 m area when you were in fact stationary. > This would affect the clock signal at the receivers and thus the > "discipline" applied to the K3. > > It wasn't very long before a number of entities, including manufacturers > and the US Coast Guard ... found ways to get around SA.? One is > Differential GPS which places stations at very carefully surveyed > locations, monitors their GPS reported positions, and transmits the > errors.? The DGPS receiver uses the errors to correct its own GPS > position.? If you have the new synthesizer for your K3 [or a K3s], you > can hear and decode the DGPS signals, they're 100 bps MSK in the 284-458 > KHz range and have a distinctive signature on a P3.? The US DoD gave up > on SA long ago but the DGPS stations remain, or at least did the last > time I checked. > > One GPS conspiracy theory posited that there was a "back door" into the > satellites put there by another country [which we'll leave nameless] > which, when activated, would be used to cause all the aircraft in the > air to converge on one point and create a great conflagration. > Conspiracy theories have a half-life and fortunately this one was fairly > short, similar to the half-life of disco and leisure suits. [:-) > > 73, > Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW > Sparks NV DM09dn > Washoe County > > On 4/3/2019 11:24 AM, na5n at zianet.com wrote: >> Fred Jensen writes: >> >>> Eventually, the 10-bit register holding the week number will overflow >>> and reset to zero. That's all that's happening, it happens every >>> 1,024 weeks, the first was in Aug 1999. >> >> The GPS reset has been the source of hysteria in various circles, >> including exhaustive discussions on the various private pilot and >> drone forums, since most aircraft and drones use GPS for real time >> positioning and navigation while in flight. >> >> In short, when this happened in 1999, changes were made to lengthen >> the roll over period to beyond our lifetime.? The April 6 rollover >> only effects older GPS devices with the 10-bit registers.? Basically, >> every GPS embedded device made in the last 10-15 years or so will not >> be affected - only the first generation devices. >> >> There are absolutely no warnings or cautions on the websites for >> Garmin, Magellan, or Trimble showing it is a non-issue for their GPS >> devices - not even mentioned.? The FAA has a list of the very few GPS >> devices used in older private aircraft that could be effected, only if >> in flight when the rollover occurs.? With 10,000+ people in the air at >> any moment, there would be a huge air of caution by the FAA and >> airlines if the rollover had any chance of effecting the GPS devices >> now in use.? In this case, "Silence is golden." >> >> 73, Paul NA5N >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From pfizenmayer at q.com Wed Apr 3 17:50:26 2019 From: pfizenmayer at q.com (HP) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 17:50:26 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Elecraft] K3S USB sound card -W7 pro Message-ID: <2087651792.57515634.1554328226902.JavaMail.zimbra@q.com> Is here any way in W7 to change the RX level when using the built in USB K3S sound card . The W7 slider goes to -10dB with a lot of care but next tap is -192 dB- In WSJT this means I have LIN out set to 001 and still a bit too high .? Hank K7HP From na5n at zianet.com Wed Apr 3 17:50:32 2019 From: na5n at zianet.com (na5n at zianet.com) Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 15:50:32 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] April 6th GPS Reset In-Reply-To: References: <4B3A3382-B46A-4923-8121-22E5FE48751E@me.com> <07a403ea-2802-e55c-0427-a7c4af77e00f@foothill.net> <20190403182427.85802.qmail@modulo.zianet.com> <415673b2-f99c-e300-a032-121dde9f6068@foothill.net> Message-ID: <20190403215032.25680.qmail@modulo.zianet.com> Dave Cole (NK7Z) writes: > How is HAARP involved in this conspiracy, it must be! GPS is being controlled by HAARP remotely through Google and FaceBook. What could go wrong? From rmcgraw at blomand.net Wed Apr 3 18:21:09 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 17:21:09 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S USB sound card -W7 pro In-Reply-To: <2087651792.57515634.1554328226902.JavaMail.zimbra@q.com> References: <2087651792.57515634.1554328226902.JavaMail.zimbra@q.com> Message-ID: <50abf0d2-e2fd-18ab-2379-074c05cb74a2@blomand.net> If you go into the K3S CONFIG menu to LIN OUT the normal value is 10.?? I suggest you back this down to 5.? This will then allow the Windows 7 Pro sound card slider to operate near mid range thus? 0 dB or 50% depending on how it is displayed. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/3/2019 4:50 PM, HP wrote: > Is here any way in W7 to change the RX level when using the built in USB K3S sound card . The W7 slider > goes to -10dB with a lot of care but next tap is -192 dB- In WSJT this means I have LIN out set to 001 and > still a bit too high .? > > Hank K7HP > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From rmcgraw at blomand.net Wed Apr 3 18:29:58 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 17:29:58 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S USB sound card -W7 pro In-Reply-To: <50abf0d2-e2fd-18ab-2379-074c05cb74a2@blomand.net> References: <2087651792.57515634.1554328226902.JavaMail.zimbra@q.com> <50abf0d2-e2fd-18ab-2379-074c05cb74a2@blomand.net> Message-ID: <37f6dc96-4e8f-2bbd-94d2-0fd3a4693dbc@blomand.net> Also, in the Windows 7 sound card? make sure your don't have Microphone Boost checked.??? Forgot about that one. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/3/2019 5:21 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > If you go into the K3S CONFIG menu to LIN OUT the normal value is > 10.?? I suggest you back this down to 5.? This will then allow the > Windows 7 Pro sound card slider to operate near mid range thus? 0 dB > or 50% depending on how it is displayed. > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX > > On 4/3/2019 4:50 PM, HP wrote: >> Is here any way in W7 to change the RX level when using the built in >> USB K3S sound card . The W7 slider >> goes to -10dB with a lot of care but next tap is -192 dB- In WSJT >> this means I have LIN out set to 001 and >> still a bit too high .? >> >> Hank K7HP >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> From john at t6ee.com Wed Apr 3 19:34:13 2019 From: john at t6ee.com (John Kountz) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 23:34:13 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Anyone with interfacing KPA1500/K3/P3 and steppIR SDA2000 Message-ID: The P26 cable works fine to connect a P3 with a K3. The S14 "Y" is comprised of two female connectors and one male and can be used to connect the P3 to the K3 but not the SteppIR SDA2000 antenna controller. Given the requirement for these three devices be interconnected is there anyone out there who has surmounted this problem? John Kountz, WO1S From jwn45 at bellsouth.net Wed Apr 3 19:34:26 2019 From: jwn45 at bellsouth.net (john norris) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 23:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] K3s for sale (N4IHV) References: <1601147034.16216925.1554334466110.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1601147034.16216925.1554334466110@mail.yahoo.com> Elecraft K3s SERIAL NUMBER 11663 Factory Built (purchased July 3,2018) Has Latest updates In a non-smoking environment Original investment $5,364.54 For Sale $4,400 including shipping inthe US (in original box) Radio Details: 100 watt version KAT3A Antenna Tuner KTCXO-1 TCXO 1 ppm KBPF3A General Coverage Receiver KDVR3 Digital Voice Recorder Main Receiver Filters: ??????????? KFL3A-2.8kHz ??????????? KFL3A-6K-IRkHz (AM) ??????????? KFL3B-FM-IR(FM) ??????????? KFL3C-200Hz (CW) ??????????? KFL3C-400Hz (CW) Has KRX3A Sub receiver with KFL3A-2.8kHz filter Hand Microphone I have two K3?s and selling one. Contact: John Norris N4IHV Jwn45 at bellsouth.net Pictures available uponrequest From jstengrevics at comcast.net Wed Apr 3 20:48:04 2019 From: jstengrevics at comcast.net (John Stengrevics) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 20:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S RIT Problem Message-ID: I seem to be reading signals about 800 Hz high. I have cleared RIT. I suspect I have hit some other setting by mistake. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 73, John WA1EAZ From hlyingst at yahoo.com Wed Apr 3 22:24:51 2019 From: hlyingst at yahoo.com (Harry Yingst) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 02:24:51 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] K3S RIT Problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2049773608.16539967.1554344691496@mail.yahoo.com> Is your REF CAL adjusted correctly? On Wednesday, April 3, 2019, 8:48:58 PM EDT, John Stengrevics wrote: I seem to be reading signals about 800 Hz high. I have cleared RIT.? I suspect I have hit some other setting by mistake. Any suggestions would be appreciated. 73, John WA1EAZ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rmcgraw at blomand.net Wed Apr 3 22:51:03 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 21:51:03 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S RIT Problem In-Reply-To: <2049773608.16539967.1554344691496@mail.yahoo.com> References: <2049773608.16539967.1554344691496@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <17fa7352-0287-bab1-dbc0-190a4d21b291@blomand.net> Just to check, I suggest going to WWV at 10 MHZ and in CW mode and press SPOT.? That will automatically lock to the WWV carrier and your selected sidetone frequency.?? No audio or zero beating needed. ?? If indeed your radio is off 800 Hz then the SPOT function will not bring it in and lock.?? If it is 100 Hz or less usually SPOT will bring it in.?? When it locks it will show the frequency and you can then know exactly what the error is referenced to WWV.??? Should be able to have an accuracy of +/- 1 Hz using this method.?? If it is greater than this, I suggest tweaking your REF CAL value a few Hz up or down as needed. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/3/2019 9:24 PM, Harry Yingst via Elecraft wrote: > Is your REF CAL adjusted correctly? > > > > > On Wednesday, April 3, 2019, 8:48:58 PM EDT, John Stengrevics wrote: > > I seem to be reading signals about 800 Hz high. > > I have cleared RIT.? I suspect I have hit some other setting by mistake. > > Any suggestions would be appreciated. > > 73, > > John > WA1EAZ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From nw8l at whitemesa.com Wed Apr 3 23:20:43 2019 From: nw8l at whitemesa.com (Robert Cunnings) Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 21:20:43 -0600 (MDT) Subject: [Elecraft] April 6th GPS Reset In-Reply-To: <20190403182427.85802.qmail@modulo.zianet.com> References: <4B3A3382-B46A-4923-8121-22E5FE48751E@me.com> <07a403ea-2802-e55c-0427-a7c4af77e00f@foothill.net> <20190403182427.85802.qmail@modulo.zianet.com> Message-ID: There is a warning on the TomTom site - and today I received an email from them regarding an older Garmin Etrex unit I own. It said in brief: ======================= Due to the upcoming WNRO on 6 April 2019, the performance of your device will be impacted. While we no longer offer content and service updates for your device, we have made an update available that addresses the GPS Week Number Rollover (WNRO). TO UPDATE: Connect your device to your computer. Click the 'update now' button for instructions? on how to update your device. ======================= The message included the serial number of my device, so I suppose I must have registered it after purchasing it. The warning page is here: https://www.tomtom.com/en_us/updates/ Bob NW8L On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, na5n at zianet.com wrote: > Fred Jensen writes: > >> Eventually, the 10-bit register holding the week number will overflow and >> reset to zero. That's all that's happening, it happens every 1,024 weeks, >> the first was in Aug 1999. > > The GPS reset has been the source of hysteria in various circles, including > exhaustive discussions on the various private pilot and drone forums, since > most aircraft and drones use GPS for real time positioning and navigation > while in flight. > > In short, when this happened in 1999, changes were made to lengthen the roll > over period to beyond our lifetime. The April 6 rollover only effects older > GPS devices with the 10-bit registers. Basically, every GPS embedded device > made in the last 10-15 years or so will not be affected - only the first > generation devices. > > There are absolutely no warnings or cautions on the websites for Garmin, > Magellan, or Trimble showing it is a non-issue for their GPS devices - not > even mentioned. The FAA has a list of the very few GPS devices used in older > private aircraft that could be effected, only if in flight when the rollover > occurs. With 10,000+ people in the air at any moment, there would be a huge > air of caution by the FAA and airlines if the rollover had any chance of > effecting the GPS devices now in use. In this case, "Silence is golden." > > 73, Paul NA5N > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jasimmons at pinewooddata.com Thu Apr 4 11:53:12 2019 From: jasimmons at pinewooddata.com (John Simmons) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 10:53:12 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Stupid question: key beep Message-ID: <765fbef4-5a48-4eda-47d3-25b5d4bf3b30@pinewooddata.com> I have two K3s. The first one emits a beep in the speaker or headphone whenever a button is pushed. The second one doesn't. I can't find anyplace to turn the function on. Is there a button or menu setting that I'm missing? 73 -John NI0K From hs0zed at gmail.com Thu Apr 4 12:04:55 2019 From: hs0zed at gmail.com (Martin Sole) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 23:04:55 +0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Stupid question: key beep In-Reply-To: <765fbef4-5a48-4eda-47d3-25b5d4bf3b30@pinewooddata.com> References: <765fbef4-5a48-4eda-47d3-25b5d4bf3b30@pinewooddata.com> Message-ID: <9d4dbdbe-93c2-3839-b3fc-ea1ab6fa89be@gmail.com> John, Go to CONFIG then scroll to SW BEEP. Rotate the vfo A knob for on or off (alternates) Martin, HS0ZED On 04/04/2019 22:53, John Simmons wrote: > I have two K3s. The first one emits a beep in the speaker or headphone > whenever a button is pushed. The second one doesn't. I can't find > anyplace to turn the function on. Is there a button or menu setting > that I'm missing? > > 73 > -John NI0K > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jimk0xu at gmail.com Thu Apr 4 12:09:53 2019 From: jimk0xu at gmail.com (Jim Rhodes) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 11:09:53 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Stupid question: key beep In-Reply-To: <765fbef4-5a48-4eda-47d3-25b5d4bf3b30@pinewooddata.com> References: <765fbef4-5a48-4eda-47d3-25b5d4bf3b30@pinewooddata.com> Message-ID: Check "SW TONE" in the Config menu. I think that is what you are looking for. On Thu, Apr 4, 2019 at 10:53 AM John Simmons wrote: > I have two K3s. The first one emits a beep in the speaker or headphone > whenever a button is pushed. The second one doesn't. I can't find > anyplace to turn the function on. Is there a button or menu setting that > I'm missing? > > 73 > -John NI0K > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > -- Jim K0XU jim at rhodesend.net From kq6dv73 at gmail.com Thu Apr 4 14:18:54 2019 From: kq6dv73 at gmail.com (Tom Johnson) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 11:18:54 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] KNB1 Installation Order & Diode Message-ID: <1554401934969-0.post@n2.nabble.com> I've completed my K1 RF Board, 4 Band Filter Board, and Antenna Tuner Board, and I am now moving on to Transmitter alignment before installing the Antenna Tuner. I discovered the KNB1 Noise Blanker is still available and just received it. (Thanks, Elecraft!) 1) I'm assuming I should install the Antenna Tuner first, then install the KNB1 - is that correct? 2) As to replacing D2 (1N4148) WITH D2A (green LED) - what are the arguments for and against that? As I will be using the K1 in a variety of locations in the Field it will obviously be impractical to install the diode on site if I discover high noise level interference there. Why not just initially install the diode to raise the threshold in order to cover worst case scenarios? 73, Tom KQ7TJ -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From fcady at montana.edu Thu Apr 4 15:18:31 2019 From: fcady at montana.edu (Cady, Fred) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:18:31 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Stupid question: key beep In-Reply-To: <765fbef4-5a48-4eda-47d3-25b5d4bf3b30@pinewooddata.com> References: <765fbef4-5a48-4eda-47d3-25b5d4bf3b30@pinewooddata.com> Message-ID: Hi John, The Configuration menu you want is SW TONE. Set it OFF. Cheers, Fred KE7X For all KE7X Elecraft books, see www.ke7x.com. ________________________________ From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of John Simmons Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 9:53 AM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Stupid question: key beep NOTICE: This email originated from outside of your organization. Do not click links, open attachments, or respond unless you were expecting this message and know the content is safe. I have two K3s. The first one emits a beep in the speaker or headphone whenever a button is pushed. The second one doesn't. I can't find anyplace to turn the function on. Is there a button or menu setting that I'm missing? 73 -John NI0K ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From n7wy at rocketmail.com Thu Apr 4 15:45:27 2019 From: n7wy at rocketmail.com (Robert Rennard) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 14:45:27 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] April 6th GPS Reset Message-ID: As NW8L pointed out, there are simple updates to restore proper date displays in GPS receivers. An update should have a release date inside the build with the associated GPS week number when it was released. With a little coding, this will allow the receiver to display date properly for 1024 weeks following the release date. Another design peril is the Age of Data counters for almanac and ephemeris data which are 9 bits. A company from Illinois thought they could get by with an 8-bit byte, but in July 2004, a whole bunch of their mobile phones went screen of death at the transition from week 255 to week 256. Somebody commented that WAAS in HI was not as good in the ConUS. I wonder where this came from. I cannot imagine the FAA would put up with this unless it is just too easy to land a plane in HI. In 2017 the GPS guys at Los Angeles AFB were indicating 40 cm repeatability, around 1.3 nanoseconds without WAAS. Bob R ? N7WY From eastbrantwood at gmail.com Thu Apr 4 16:11:50 2019 From: eastbrantwood at gmail.com (Stephen Prior) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 21:11:50 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] MD2 microphone Message-ID: I don't know whether anyone can help, but I am trying without any success to get the MD2 microphone working with a SunSdr2 transceiver, which is able to provide the necessary bias voltage I believe. What I am lacking, and have not been able to find online is the original manual for the microphone giving pinout and bias details - for I'm sure that there is something that I must have missed. Thanks and 73, Stephen G4SJP From ray2.s at btinternet.com Thu Apr 4 16:21:28 2019 From: ray2.s at btinternet.com (Ray Spreadbury) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 21:21:28 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Problem with Filters Update Message-ID: <020101d4eb23$fca7dff0$f5f79fd0$@btinternet.com> I contacted Elecraft Support as advised & Doug suggested I re-seat the filters in the main board & the Sub Receiver. Lo & behold,... the problem disappeared and audio from all filters is now normal! Thanks Doug 73 Ray G3XLG From donwilh at embarqmail.com Thu Apr 4 16:36:05 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:36:05 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] MD2 microphone In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <116af20a-d1a6-4a04-c4ca-0195e314ed08@embarqmail.com> Stephen, The pinout for the MD2 microphone is the same as the MH2 and MH4. Bias requirement is also the same - it needs a 5.6k resistor from the AF signal (pin 1) and either +5 or +8 volts. The pinout matches the mic jack wiring which is shown in the K3/K3S manual on page 13. Download the K3 manual if you don't have it. You may also find the microphone pinout at the G4WPW website which has been preserved at https://www.qsl.net/g4wpw/date.html#others. Hint: connect both pin 7 and pin 8 to the common ground. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/4/2019 4:11 PM, Stephen Prior wrote: > I don't know whether anyone can help, but I am trying without any success > to get the MD2 microphone working with a SunSdr2 transceiver, which is able > to provide the necessary bias voltage I believe. What I am lacking, and > have not been able to find online is the original manual for the microphone > giving pinout and bias details - for I'm sure that there is something that > I must have missed. > > Thanks and 73, > > Stephen G4SJP > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From jasimmons at pinewooddata.com Thu Apr 4 18:29:54 2019 From: jasimmons at pinewooddata.com (John Simmons) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 17:29:54 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Stupid question: key beep In-Reply-To: References: <765fbef4-5a48-4eda-47d3-25b5d4bf3b30@pinewooddata.com> Message-ID: SW Tone is on, but there is no beep when the button is pushed. Any other suggestions on how to turn on the button beep? -J Cady, Fred wrote on 4/4/2019 2:18 PM: > > Hi John, > > The Configuration menu you want is SW TONE.? Set it OFF. > > Cheers, > > Fred KE7X > > > > For all KE7X Elecraft books, see www.ke7x.com. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > *From:* elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net > on behalf of John Simmons > > *Sent:* Thursday, April 4, 2019 9:53 AM > *To:* elecraft at mailman.qth.net > *Subject:* [Elecraft] Stupid question: key beep > NOTICE: This email originated from outside of your organization. Do > not click links, open attachments, or respond unless you were > expecting this message and know the content is safe. > > I have two K3s. The first one emits a beep in the speaker or headphone > whenever a button is pushed. The second one doesn't. I can't find > anyplace to turn the function on. Is there a button or menu setting that > I'm missing? > > 73 > -John NI0K > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From ab2tc at arrl.net Thu Apr 4 19:29:17 2019 From: ab2tc at arrl.net (ab2tc) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:29:17 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] OT (maybe): Bouvet expedition safely back Message-ID: <1554420557225-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Hi all, The 3Y0I expedition ship is safely back in Cape Town, thank God. I apologize for the OT (maybe) posting and promise I will not post post any further on the subject unless something dramatically changes (such a them setting sail for a second foolish attempt at Bouvet this season). AB2T - Knut -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From ab2tc at arrl.net Thu Apr 4 19:40:29 2019 From: ab2tc at arrl.net (ab2tc) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 16:40:29 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] OT (maybe): Bouvet expedition safely back In-Reply-To: <1554420557225-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1554420557225-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1554421229068-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Hi again, Sorry again, I forgot to include the link to captain's message: https://bouvetoya.org/the-official-statement-of-atlantic-tunas-captain/ ABT2TC - Knut ab2tc wrote > Hi all, > > The 3Y0I expedition ship is safely back in Cape Town, thank God. I > apologize > for the OT (maybe) posting and promise I will not post any further on > the subject unless something dramatically changes (such a them setting > sail > for a second foolish attempt at Bouvet this season). > > AB2T - Knut > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto: > Elecraft at .qth > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From rmcgraw at blomand.net Thu Apr 4 20:04:39 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2019 19:04:39 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Stupid question: key beep In-Reply-To: References: <765fbef4-5a48-4eda-47d3-25b5d4bf3b30@pinewooddata.com> Message-ID: <7afda5cb-cb12-6307-5ec8-c77a15497335@blomand.net> If in CW mode the MON function determines the level of the beep.?? Not all switches generate a tone when pressed.??? See page 65 SW TONE for more details.?? If SW TONE is set to OFF there is no tone beep generated. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/4/2019 5:29 PM, John Simmons wrote: > SW Tone is on, but there is no beep when the button is pushed. Any > other suggestions on how to turn on the button beep? > > -J > > Cady, Fred wrote on 4/4/2019 2:18 PM: >> >> Hi John, >> >> The Configuration menu you want is SW TONE.? Set it OFF. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Fred KE7X >> >> >> >> For all KE7X Elecraft books, see www.ke7x.com. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> *From:* elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net >> on behalf of John Simmons >> >> *Sent:* Thursday, April 4, 2019 9:53 AM >> *To:* elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> *Subject:* [Elecraft] Stupid question: key beep >> NOTICE: This email originated from outside of your organization. Do >> not click links, open attachments, or respond unless you were >> expecting this message and know the content is safe. >> >> I have two K3s. The first one emits a beep in the speaker or headphone >> whenever a button is pushed. The second one doesn't. I can't find >> anyplace to turn the function on. Is there a button or menu setting that >> I'm missing? >> >> 73 >> -John NI0K >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From gkidder at ilstu.edu Thu Apr 4 20:19:40 2019 From: gkidder at ilstu.edu (Kidder, George) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 00:19:40 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 Message-ID: <11216766-3d55-437e-6858-35298738aa7d@ilstu.edu> Two suggestions which can probably be added in firmware for K3 and K3s: 1)? Allow different audio levels for speaker and phones, such as an attenuation applicable to either. 2)? Allow (but not require) the monitor level to be controlled along with the receiver levels. If either is already available for the K3, someone please let me know! 73 - George, W3HBM From pfizenmayer at q.com Fri Apr 5 00:28:58 2019 From: pfizenmayer at q.com (HP) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 00:28:58 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft Digest, Vol 180, Issue 4 K3S USB W7 audio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1762543138.61495717.1554438538231.JavaMail.zimbra@q.com> LIN OUT is already set at 1. The Microphone level set and extra attenuator steps in W7 are not active until you plug a microphone into the MIC jack and has no effect on the K3S internal sound card whuch shows up as its own COM device. Hank K7HP Message: 9 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 17:29:58 -0500 From: Bob McGraw K4TAX To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S USB sound card -W7 pro Message-ID: <37f6dc96-4e8f-2bbd-94d2-0fd3a4693dbc at blomand.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Also, in the Windows 7 sound card? make sure your don't have Microphone Boost checked.??? Forgot about that one. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/3/2019 5:21 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > If you go into the K3S CONFIG menu to LIN OUT the normal value is > 10.?? I suggest you back this down to 5.? This will then allow the > Windows 7 Pro sound card slider to operate near mid range thus? 0 dB > or 50% depending on how it is displayed. > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX > > On 4/3/2019 4:50 PM, HP wrote: >> Is here any way in W7 to change the RX level when using the built in >> USB K3S sound card . The W7 slider >> goes to -10dB with a lot of care but next tap is -192 dB- In WSJT >> this means I have LIN out set to 001 and its. still a bit too high .? >> >> Hank K7HP From Hamshack at N4ST.com Fri Apr 5 08:53:10 2019 From: Hamshack at N4ST.com (Jim - N4ST) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 08:53:10 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 In-Reply-To: <11216766-3d55-437e-6858-35298738aa7d@ilstu.edu> References: <11216766-3d55-437e-6858-35298738aa7d@ilstu.edu> Message-ID: <083401d4ebae$8b276a40$a1763ec0$@N4ST.com> Something I would like to see is an audio alert, beep, CW message if the SWR is over 3:1. When operating digital modes, I'm often looking at the computer screen and not the rig. Hate when I'm out of sync with my band and the proper antenna. ? _____________ 73, Jim - N4ST -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Kidder, George Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 20:20 To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 Two suggestions which can probably be added in firmware for K3 and K3s: 1) Allow different audio levels for speaker and phones, such as an attenuation applicable to either. 2) Allow (but not require) the monitor level to be controlled along with the receiver levels. If either is already available for the K3, someone please let me know! 73 - George, W3HBM ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From donwilh at embarqmail.com Fri Apr 5 10:05:27 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 10:05:27 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KNB1 Installation Order & Diode In-Reply-To: <1554401934969-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1554401934969-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Tom, The K1 options can be installed in any order. As far as the D2 diode, that is entirely your choice, and should be based on your local noise situation. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/4/2019 2:18 PM, Tom Johnson wrote: > I've completed my K1 RF Board, 4 Band Filter Board, and Antenna Tuner Board, > and I am now moving on to Transmitter alignment before installing the > Antenna Tuner. > > I discovered the KNB1 Noise Blanker is still available and just received it. > (Thanks, Elecraft!) > > 1) I'm assuming I should install the Antenna Tuner first, then install the > KNB1 - is that correct? > > 2) As to replacing D2 (1N4148) WITH D2A (green LED) - what are the > arguments for and against that? As I will be using the K1 in a variety of > locations in the Field it will obviously be impractical to install the diode > on site if I discover high noise level interference there. Why not just > initially install the diode to raise the threshold in order to cover worst > case scenarios? From john at kk9a.com Fri Apr 5 10:39:14 2019 From: john at kk9a.com (john at kk9a.com) Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 09:39:14 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 Message-ID: <20190405093914.Horde.26XtpSq1Jk0cTZoU3GfyQbE@www11.qth.com> My Telepost LP100 does a great job of giving high SWR warnings. John KK9A Jim - N4ST wrote: Something I would like to see is an audio alert, beep, CW message if the SWR is over 3:1. When operating digital modes, I'm often looking at the computer screen and not the rig. Hate when I'm out of sync with my band and the proper antenna. ? _____________ 73, Jim - N4ST From pubx1 at af2z.net Fri Apr 5 12:25:49 2019 From: pubx1 at af2z.net (Drew AF2Z) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:25:49 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 In-Reply-To: <083401d4ebae$8b276a40$a1763ec0$@N4ST.com> References: <11216766-3d55-437e-6858-35298738aa7d@ilstu.edu> <083401d4ebae$8b276a40$a1763ec0$@N4ST.com> Message-ID: <1017264f-d8f2-e55e-d3b5-a99d682c9afc@af2z.net> I have also thought that an audible SWR indicator would be very useful but never bothered to mention it as most would probably consider it to be a little too gimmicky. But it would be quite handy for me when I'm using an external match box-- when I lean across the desk to adjust it I can no longer easily see the little SWR meter indicator in the K3 display. I'd suggest a "geiger counter" type audible indicator: a fast beep for SWR values greter than 3:1 and progressively slower as you zero in on 1:1. 73, Drew AF2Z On 04/05/19 08:53, Jim - N4ST wrote: > Something I would like to see is an audio alert, beep, CW message if the SWR is over 3:1. > When operating digital modes, I'm often looking at the computer screen and not the rig. > Hate when I'm out of sync with my band and the proper antenna. ? > > _____________ > 73, > Jim - N4ST > > -----Original Message----- > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Kidder, George > Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 20:20 > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 > > Two suggestions which can probably be added in firmware for K3 and K3s: > > 1) Allow different audio levels for speaker and phones, such as an attenuation applicable to either. > > 2) Allow (but not require) the monitor level to be controlled along with the receiver levels. > > If either is already available for the K3, someone please let me know! > > 73 - George, W3HBM > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From pubx1 at af2z.net Fri Apr 5 12:46:15 2019 From: pubx1 at af2z.net (Drew AF2Z) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:46:15 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 In-Reply-To: <11216766-3d55-437e-6858-35298738aa7d@ilstu.edu> References: <11216766-3d55-437e-6858-35298738aa7d@ilstu.edu> Message-ID: <5a7937da-a79a-0e49-d0cc-0e225c624b65@af2z.net> I don't expect to see it for the K3 but perhaps someday a K4 will have a CW pitch adjustment that: a) does not blank the received signals when you engage it as the current sidetone pitch adjustment does; b) keeps the signal centered in the passband while pitch is adjusted, unlike when you adjust RIT or VFO to change a signal's pitch. 73, Drew AF2Z On 04/04/19 20:19, Kidder, George wrote: > Two suggestions which can probably be added in firmware for K3 and K3s: > > 1)? Allow different audio levels for speaker and phones, such as an > attenuation applicable to either. > > 2)? Allow (but not require) the monitor level to be controlled along > with the receiver levels. > > If either is already available for the K3, someone please let me know! > > 73 - George, W3HBM > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From ghyoungman at gmail.com Fri Apr 5 12:48:43 2019 From: ghyoungman at gmail.com (Grant Youngman) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:48:43 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 In-Reply-To: <1017264f-d8f2-e55e-d3b5-a99d682c9afc@af2z.net> References: <11216766-3d55-437e-6858-35298738aa7d@ilstu.edu> <083401d4ebae$8b276a40$a1763ec0$@N4ST.com> <1017264f-d8f2-e55e-d3b5-a99d682c9afc@af2z.net> Message-ID: <33A3E38F-667E-40C5-9967-12EF61F1779C@gmail.com> I suppose that would be useful, as long as it didn?t beep at you incessantly every time an internal ATU cycle was run. But If I had to reach around to use an external matchbox and didn?t have a visual indication of SWR while trying to do that, I think I?d rearrange my station :-) Trying to tune a matchbox with nothing but a digital readout (rather than an analog meter indication) is a hair-pulling PITA anyway. Grant NQ5T K3 #2091 KX3 #8342 > On Apr 5, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Drew AF2Z wrote: > > I have also thought that an audible SWR indicator would be very useful but never bothered to mention it as most would probably consider it to be a little too gimmicky. But it would be quite handy for me when I'm using an external match box-- when I lean across the desk to adjust it I can no longer easily see the little SWR meter indicator in the K3 display. > > I'd suggest a "geiger counter" type audible indicator: a fast beep for SWR values greter than 3:1 and progressively slower as you zero in on 1:1. > From pubx1 at af2z.net Fri Apr 5 13:04:28 2019 From: pubx1 at af2z.net (Drew AF2Z) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 13:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 In-Reply-To: <33A3E38F-667E-40C5-9967-12EF61F1779C@gmail.com> References: <11216766-3d55-437e-6858-35298738aa7d@ilstu.edu> <083401d4ebae$8b276a40$a1763ec0$@N4ST.com> <1017264f-d8f2-e55e-d3b5-a99d682c9afc@af2z.net> <33A3E38F-667E-40C5-9967-12EF61F1779C@gmail.com> Message-ID: I suggest the audible SWR indicator be in effect only while the TUNE button is being pressed. But I'm not sure if such an indicator is even feasible as I understand there is some "mission critical" code in the K3 that senses catastrophic antenna failure. An audible SWR indicator might perhaps steal some cycles from that code, I don't know. But again I suggest it only while TUNE is engaged so perhaps we could risk not having protection against an antenna failure during these brief tuning periods and touching up the SWR. As to my station arrangement, it is precisely the reason why I use a manual t-match on the other end of the desk: to keep my endfed wire and its counterpoises, which would otherwise connect directly to the K3, nearer to their egress point from the shack. So, the arrangement is by intention. 73, Drew AF2Z On 04/05/19 12:48, Grant Youngman wrote: > I suppose that would be useful, as long as it didn?t beep at you incessantly every time an internal ATU cycle was run. > > But If I had to reach around to use an external matchbox and didn?t have a visual indication of SWR while trying to do that, I think I?d rearrange my station :-) Trying to tune a matchbox with nothing but a digital readout (rather than an analog meter indication) is a hair-pulling PITA anyway. > > > Grant NQ5T > K3 #2091 KX3 #8342 > >> On Apr 5, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Drew AF2Z wrote: >> >> I have also thought that an audible SWR indicator would be very useful but never bothered to mention it as most would probably consider it to be a little too gimmicky. But it would be quite handy for me when I'm using an external match box-- when I lean across the desk to adjust it I can no longer easily see the little SWR meter indicator in the K3 display. >> >> I'd suggest a "geiger counter" type audible indicator: a fast beep for SWR values greter than 3:1 and progressively slower as you zero in on 1:1. >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From pubx1 at af2z.net Fri Apr 5 13:04:28 2019 From: pubx1 at af2z.net (Drew AF2Z) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 13:04:28 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 In-Reply-To: <33A3E38F-667E-40C5-9967-12EF61F1779C@gmail.com> References: <11216766-3d55-437e-6858-35298738aa7d@ilstu.edu> <083401d4ebae$8b276a40$a1763ec0$@N4ST.com> <1017264f-d8f2-e55e-d3b5-a99d682c9afc@af2z.net> <33A3E38F-667E-40C5-9967-12EF61F1779C@gmail.com> Message-ID: I suggest the audible SWR indicator be in effect only while the TUNE button is being pressed. But I'm not sure if such an indicator is even feasible as I understand there is some "mission critical" code in the K3 that senses catastrophic antenna failure. An audible SWR indicator might perhaps steal some cycles from that code, I don't know. But again I suggest it only while TUNE is engaged so perhaps we could risk not having protection against an antenna failure during these brief tuning periods and touching up the SWR. As to my station arrangement, it is precisely the reason why I use a manual t-match on the other end of the desk: to keep my endfed wire and its counterpoises, which would otherwise connect directly to the K3, nearer to their egress point from the shack. So, the arrangement is by intention. 73, Drew AF2Z On 04/05/19 12:48, Grant Youngman wrote: > I suppose that would be useful, as long as it didn?t beep at you incessantly every time an internal ATU cycle was run. > > But If I had to reach around to use an external matchbox and didn?t have a visual indication of SWR while trying to do that, I think I?d rearrange my station :-) Trying to tune a matchbox with nothing but a digital readout (rather than an analog meter indication) is a hair-pulling PITA anyway. > > > Grant NQ5T > K3 #2091 KX3 #8342 > >> On Apr 5, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Drew AF2Z wrote: >> >> I have also thought that an audible SWR indicator would be very useful but never bothered to mention it as most would probably consider it to be a little too gimmicky. But it would be quite handy for me when I'm using an external match box-- when I lean across the desk to adjust it I can no longer easily see the little SWR meter indicator in the K3 display. >> >> I'd suggest a "geiger counter" type audible indicator: a fast beep for SWR values greter than 3:1 and progressively slower as you zero in on 1:1. >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From rmcgraw at blomand.net Fri Apr 5 14:38:03 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 13:38:03 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 In-Reply-To: <1017264f-d8f2-e55e-d3b5-a99d682c9afc@af2z.net> References: <11216766-3d55-437e-6858-35298738aa7d@ilstu.edu> <083401d4ebae$8b276a40$a1763ec0$@N4ST.com> <1017264f-d8f2-e55e-d3b5-a99d682c9afc@af2z.net> Message-ID: <7bcc9337-c10a-a884-623d-59d3df68da96@blomand.net> I have my station set up such that I can see all the important stuff.? I don't need audible alarms on the radios, the computers or such.?? I want to OPERATE my station, enjoy it, learn from it and with it.? I don't want IT doing everything for me.?? I want to be totally involved.?? I flew airplanes for some time, I understand "scanning the panel".? It is necessary. While there are improvements that can be implemented in my K3S, I prefer to take advantage of what it does and the way it does it and learn with it.? Otherwise, I write a chunk of code, load it on the computer and go away while the station works the DX, logs the DX and uploads the logs all while I sleep, eat, enjoy a movie and such.?? Is that the direction of hamming??? Nah, not even close. Folks it is a hobby.? I seem to think we are forgetting that. No different than "Googling everything" and anytime there is a question.?? Why not take time to Read The Manual or do other research to answer ones question.??? You'd be a lot smarter that way.??? No different than the professor saying he will give a final exam and provide the answers at test time.?? That's different to an open book test. ? Why then go to class and perhaps learn something??? Just take the test, pass with flying colors, and be as dumb as a box of rocks on the subject.?? Is that where we are going with the hobby??? Seems so. Now you can delete this.?? Thank you. 73 Bob, K4TAX From elecraftcovers at gmail.com Fri Apr 5 14:43:52 2019 From: elecraftcovers at gmail.com (Rose) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:43:52 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 In-Reply-To: <7bcc9337-c10a-a884-623d-59d3df68da96@blomand.net> References: <11216766-3d55-437e-6858-35298738aa7d@ilstu.edu> <083401d4ebae$8b276a40$a1763ec0$@N4ST.com> <1017264f-d8f2-e55e-d3b5-a99d682c9afc@af2z.net> <7bcc9337-c10a-a884-623d-59d3df68da96@blomand.net> Message-ID: Well said, Bob. 73 ! Ken Kopp - K0PP On Fri, Apr 5, 2019, 12:38 Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > I have my station set up such that I can see all the important stuff. I > don't need audible alarms on the radios, the computers or such. I want > to OPERATE my station, enjoy it, learn from it and with it. I don't > want IT doing everything for me. I want to be totally involved. I > flew airplanes for some time, I understand "scanning the panel". It is > necessary. > > While there are improvements that can be implemented in my K3S, I prefer > to take advantage of what it does and the way it does it and learn with > it. Otherwise, I write a chunk of code, load it on the computer and go > away while the station works the DX, logs the DX and uploads the logs > all while I sleep, eat, enjoy a movie and such. Is that the direction > of hamming? Nah, not even close. > > Folks it is a hobby. I seem to think we are forgetting that. No > different than "Googling everything" and anytime there is a question. > Why not take time to Read The Manual or do other research to answer ones > question. You'd be a lot smarter that way. No different than the > professor saying he will give a final exam and provide the answers at > test time. That's different to an open book test. Why then go to > class and perhaps learn something? Just take the test, pass with > flying colors, and be as dumb as a box of rocks on the subject. Is > that where we are going with the hobby? Seems so. > > Now you can delete this. Thank you. > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From buddy at brannan.name Fri Apr 5 13:44:31 2019 From: buddy at brannan.name (Buddy Brannan) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 13:44:31 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 In-Reply-To: <1017264f-d8f2-e55e-d3b5-a99d682c9afc@af2z.net> References: <11216766-3d55-437e-6858-35298738aa7d@ilstu.edu> <083401d4ebae$8b276a40$a1763ec0$@N4ST.com> <1017264f-d8f2-e55e-d3b5-a99d682c9afc@af2z.net> Message-ID: <9123BCD4-CE93-4E5D-9D66-17E95F26BEB9@brannan.name> The more audio alerts, the better, in my always humble opinion :-) Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA Email: buddy at brannan.name Mobile: (814) 431-0962 > On Apr 5, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Drew AF2Z wrote: > > I have also thought that an audible SWR indicator would be very useful but never bothered to mention it as most would probably consider it to be a little too gimmicky. But it would be quite handy for me when I'm using an external match box-- when I lean across the desk to adjust it I can no longer easily see the little SWR meter indicator in the K3 display. > > I'd suggest a "geiger counter" type audible indicator: a fast beep for SWR values greter than 3:1 and progressively slower as you zero in on 1:1. > > 73, > Drew > AF2Z > > > > On 04/05/19 08:53, Jim - N4ST wrote: >> Something I would like to see is an audio alert, beep, CW message if the SWR is over 3:1. >> When operating digital modes, I'm often looking at the computer screen and not the rig. >> Hate when I'm out of sync with my band and the proper antenna. ? >> _____________ >> 73, >> Jim - N4ST >> -----Original Message----- >> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Kidder, George >> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 20:20 >> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 >> Two suggestions which can probably be added in firmware for K3 and K3s: >> 1) Allow different audio levels for speaker and phones, such as an attenuation applicable to either. >> 2) Allow (but not require) the monitor level to be controlled along with the receiver levels. >> If either is already available for the K3, someone please let me know! >> 73 - George, W3HBM >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From fcady at montana.edu Fri Apr 5 14:48:31 2019 From: fcady at montana.edu (Cady, Fred) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 18:48:31 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Stupid question: key beep In-Reply-To: References: <765fbef4-5a48-4eda-47d3-25b5d4bf3b30@pinewooddata.com> , Message-ID: Sorry John, I misread your post. To have the sw tones, SW TONE should be ON. If it is, I don't know why you don't get tones except some switches like REV and M1 - M4 don't generate tones. Fred ________________________________ From: John Simmons Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 4:29 PM To: Cady, Fred Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Stupid question: key beep NOTICE: This email originated from outside of your organization. Do not click links, open attachments, or respond unless you were expecting this message and know the content is safe. SW Tone is on, but there is no beep when the button is pushed. Any other suggestions on how to turn on the button beep? -J Cady, Fred wrote on 4/4/2019 2:18 PM: Hi John, The Configuration menu you want is SW TONE. Set it OFF. Cheers, Fred KE7X For all KE7X Elecraft books, see www.ke7x.com. ________________________________ From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of John Simmons Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 9:53 AM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Stupid question: key beep NOTICE: This email originated from outside of your organization. Do not click links, open attachments, or respond unless you were expecting this message and know the content is safe. I have two K3s. The first one emits a beep in the speaker or headphone whenever a button is pushed. The second one doesn't. I can't find anyplace to turn the function on. Is there a button or menu setting that I'm missing? 73 -John NI0K ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From elecraft.list at videotron.ca Fri Apr 5 15:17:26 2019 From: elecraft.list at videotron.ca (Tom) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 15:17:26 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] New release of Win4K3Suite, Version 2.002 Message-ID: <006001d4ebe4$355ac900$a0105b00$@videotron.ca> Hello, There is a new version of Win4K3Suite available, version 2.002. For those of you who know the software, going to version 2 doesn't necessarily mean major changes since the software has been around for 6+ years and has had dozens of enhancements. This version though is worthy of the version 2 designation. Win4K3Suite now has user customizable Skins, that can change the look and feel of Win4K3. Be sure to check out the pre-defined skins or create your own. Here is an example: https://va2fsq.com/wp-content/uploads/Win4K3-Version-2.png This version also now requires .NET 4.6 or higher. This will be automatically installed by Windows if it does not exist. If you computer asks to be rebooted, accept and then when it restarted, run the installation of Win4K3 again. That will bring it up to date. Be sure to follow the detailed instructions on the download page. Win4K3Suite is a full featured control program for the K3/S, KX3 and KX2. It has a built in Panadapter that works with LPPAN and a sound card, as well as the SDRPlay RSP's. It supports the KAT500, KPA500/1500 and the KXPA100 on most of the above radios. A unique feature is that is has 6 built in Virtual Radios, each of which works just like an Elecraft radio. This allows sharing of a single COM port with up to 6 applications. It also has a built in HRDLogbook server and the EiBi Shortwave database which is now up to date. You see more information here: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=win4k3suite and download a fully functional 30 day trial at va2fsq.com 73 Tom va2fsq.com --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From ch at murgatroid.com Fri Apr 5 15:17:21 2019 From: ch at murgatroid.com (Christopher Hoover) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 12:17:21 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s In-Reply-To: <32D6BA7D-A4B2-48DC-BB75-4D18F71BEBED@gmail.com> References: <32D6BA7D-A4B2-48DC-BB75-4D18F71BEBED@gmail.com> Message-ID: Use PKTUSB with fldigi digital modes. This is covered in the fldigi docs. 73 de AI6KG On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:47 PM Gmail wrote: > It appears FLDIGI MAC uses USB for RTTY not the standard LSB. Use data A > for RTTY. If AFSK is used FlDIGI needs to be in REV mode. > If FLDIGI is not decoding correctly or no one answers calls, check the > mode. > I don?t know if this applies to PC FLDIGI. > RAY > W8LYJ > Sent from my iPad > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From anyone1545 at gmail.com Fri Apr 5 16:31:16 2019 From: anyone1545 at gmail.com (Raymond) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 16:31:16 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s In-Reply-To: References: <32D6BA7D-A4B2-48DC-BB75-4D18F71BEBED@gmail.com> Message-ID: <674C382D-E6E8-4E49-BB80-36FF25740A89@gmail.com> That option is not available or I would. The drop down box is blank. The instructions I read say use RTTY and have the radio in LSB. Ray Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 5, 2019, at 3:17 PM, Christopher Hoover wrote: > > Use PKTUSB with fldigi digital modes. This is covered in the fldigi docs. > > 73 de AI6KG > >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 1:47 PM Gmail wrote: >> It appears FLDIGI MAC uses USB for RTTY not the standard LSB. Use data A for RTTY. If AFSK is used FlDIGI needs to be in REV mode. >> If FLDIGI is not decoding correctly or no one answers calls, check the mode. >> I don?t know if this applies to PC FLDIGI. >> RAY >> W8LYJ >> Sent from my iPad >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From donwilh at embarqmail.com Fri Apr 5 16:59:18 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 16:59:18 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s In-Reply-To: <674C382D-E6E8-4E49-BB80-36FF25740A89@gmail.com> References: <32D6BA7D-A4B2-48DC-BB75-4D18F71BEBED@gmail.com> <674C382D-E6E8-4E49-BB80-36FF25740A89@gmail.com> Message-ID: Ray and all, The K3/K3S/KX3/KX2 has a DATA submode AFSK A which is LSB (unless you change it) and also has special filters for RTTY - you have to set the mark frequency in the menu to match your software (or the other way around). Using the DATA submodes rather than SSB automatically sets the compression to zero and the TX and RX EQ to flat. That allows you to switch to DATA modes without disturbing whatever compression and EQ settings you have set for SSB. Read the Elecraft manuals for more information. So if you set the K3 to AFSK A, you are placing the K3 in USB mode and complying with the FLDIGI instructions that you read. FLDIGI instructions do not consider the features available on the K3 because they are written for the lowest common denominator and apply to transceivers that do not have specific DATA modes. As a side note, for non-RTTY soundcard data modes, use K3 DATA submode DATA A rather than SSB USB. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/5/2019 4:31 PM, Raymond wrote: > That option is not available or I would. The drop down box is blank. The instructions I read say use RTTY and have the radio in LSB. > Ray > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 5, 2019, at 3:17 PM, Christopher Hoover wrote: >> >> Use PKTUSB with fldigi digital modes. This is covered in the fldigi docs. >> >> 73 de AI6KG From anyone1545 at gmail.com Fri Apr 5 17:10:33 2019 From: anyone1545 at gmail.com (Gmail) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 17:10:33 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] FLDIGI with K3s In-Reply-To: References: <32D6BA7D-A4B2-48DC-BB75-4D18F71BEBED@gmail.com> <674C382D-E6E8-4E49-BB80-36FF25740A89@gmail.com> Message-ID: <13E62907-541B-4D50-93DE-B31F810BF046@gmail.com> When FLDIGI rig control is ?XML-RPC? the mode select drop down box under frequency is disabled. In that rig control mode Data A which is USB needs to be use. I did not realize until I just checked FLDIGI that it is only disabled in that rig control mode. Ray Sent from my iPad > On Apr 5, 2019, at 16:59, Don Wilhelm wrote: > > Ray and all, > > The K3/K3S/KX3/KX2 has a DATA submode AFSK A which is LSB (unless you change it) and also has special filters for RTTY - you have to set the mark frequency in the menu to match your software (or the other way around). > Using the DATA submodes rather than SSB automatically sets the compression to zero and the TX and RX EQ to flat. That allows you to switch to DATA modes without disturbing whatever compression and EQ settings you have set for SSB. > > Read the Elecraft manuals for more information. > > So if you set the K3 to AFSK A, you are placing the K3 in USB mode and complying with the FLDIGI instructions that you read. > > FLDIGI instructions do not consider the features available on the K3 because they are written for the lowest common denominator and apply to transceivers that do not have specific DATA modes. > > As a side note, for non-RTTY soundcard data modes, use K3 DATA submode DATA A rather than SSB USB. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > >> On 4/5/2019 4:31 PM, Raymond wrote: >> That option is not available or I would. The drop down box is blank. The instructions I read say use RTTY and have the radio in LSB. >> Ray >> Sent from my iPhone >>> On Apr 5, 2019, at 3:17 PM, Christopher Hoover wrote: >>> >>> Use PKTUSB with fldigi digital modes. This is covered in the fldigi docs. >>> >>> 73 de AI6KG From jamesforsman at me.com Fri Apr 5 18:04:20 2019 From: jamesforsman at me.com (jrquark) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 18:04:20 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 In-Reply-To: <9123BCD4-CE93-4E5D-9D66-17E95F26BEB9@brannan.name> References: <11216766-3d55-437e-6858-35298738aa7d@ilstu.edu> <083401d4ebae$8b276a40$a1763ec0$@N4ST.com> <1017264f-d8f2-e55e-d3b5-a99d682c9afc@af2z.net> <9123BCD4-CE93-4E5D-9D66-17E95F26BEB9@brannan.name> Message-ID: <80805F8A-ECA6-4122-AE05-6BD0C766624D@me.com> Great Ideas! May I suggest, in the name of ?feature creep?, a suggestion? So, have the K3 or K3s dial up your cell phone where you can program specialty ring tones for all sorts of ?mission critical? events. This will surely get our attention while in the heat of battle for another 59 contact. Or not! James Forsman - K7BIE jamesforsman at me.com https://jrquark.smugmug.com/HamRadio > On Apr 5, 2019, at 1:44 PM, Buddy Brannan wrote: > > The more audio alerts, the better, in my always humble opinion :-) > > > Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA > Email: buddy at brannan.name > Mobile: (814) 431-0962 > > > >> On Apr 5, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Drew AF2Z wrote: >> >> I have also thought that an audible SWR indicator would be very useful but never bothered to mention it as most would probably consider it to be a little too gimmicky. But it would be quite handy for me when I'm using an external match box-- when I lean across the desk to adjust it I can no longer easily see the little SWR meter indicator in the K3 display. >> >> I'd suggest a "geiger counter" type audible indicator: a fast beep for SWR values greter than 3:1 and progressively slower as you zero in on 1:1. >> >> 73, >> Drew >> AF2Z >> >> >> >> On 04/05/19 08:53, Jim - N4ST wrote: >>> Something I would like to see is an audio alert, beep, CW message if the SWR is over 3:1. >>> When operating digital modes, I'm often looking at the computer screen and not the rig. >>> Hate when I'm out of sync with my band and the proper antenna. ? >>> _____________ >>> 73, >>> Jim - N4ST >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Kidder, George >>> Sent: Thursday, April 4, 2019 20:20 >>> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> Subject: [Elecraft] Suggested enhancements for K3 >>> Two suggestions which can probably be added in firmware for K3 and K3s: >>> 1) Allow different audio levels for speaker and phones, such as an attenuation applicable to either. >>> 2) Allow (but not require) the monitor level to be controlled along with the receiver levels. >>> If either is already available for the K3, someone please let me know! >>> 73 - George, W3HBM >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jwn45 at bellsouth.net Fri Apr 5 19:10:55 2019 From: jwn45 at bellsouth.net (john norris) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 23:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] K3s For Sale (Revised) N4IHV References: <1733035196.17474961.1554505855613.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1733035196.17474961.1554505855613@mail.yahoo.com> Elecraft K3s (Revised) SERIAL NUMBER 11663 Factory Built (purchased July 3,2018) Has Latest updates In a non-smoking environment Original investment $5,364.54 For Sale $4,400 including shipping inthe US (in original box) I will remove the 2ndReceiver, sub receiver, with 2.8 filter and sell the K3s for $3,800 if desired. Radio Details: 100 watt version KAT3A Antenna Tuner KTCXO-1 TCXO 1 ppm KBPF3A General Coverage Receiver KDVR3 Digital Voice Recorder Main Receiver Filters: ??????????? KFL3A-2.8kHz ??????????? KFL3A-6K-IRkHz (AM) ??????????? KFL3B-FM-IR(FM) ??????????? KFL3C-200Hz (CW) ??????????? KFL3C-400Hz (CW) Has KRX3A Sub receiver with KFL3A-2.8kHz filter (see note above) Hand Microphone I have two K3?s and selling one. Contact: John Norris N4IHV Jwn45 at bellsouth.net Pictures available uponrequest From a.durbin at msn.com Fri Apr 5 20:22:54 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 00:22:54 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 keyed with no drive Message-ID: An unexpected shut down of my station PC led to a cascading failure that caused my Arduino station logger to key my KPA500. I was alerted to the problem by the KPA500 fan running a level 1. Indicated temperature was 50 deg C. I estimate that my KPA500 was continuously keyed with no RF drive for about 2 hours. My system design error was corrected by adding a blocking diode between my Arduino station logger and the KAT500 key line so it won't happen again. (Arduino monitors the state of the key line but pulled it low when it lost power from the USB hub). My question - Is there any possibility that my KPA500 suffered any harm from being keyed for such a long time with no drive? 73, Andy, k3wyc From mike.ab3ap at gmail.com Fri Apr 5 21:00:55 2019 From: mike.ab3ap at gmail.com (Mike Markowski) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 21:00:55 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: K Line's 100th Message-ID: Google does a pretty good job of bringing up things on my phone that I'm interested in. But I got a smile when this one showed up. Nothing is infallible, even machine learning. :-) https://splash247.com/new-boss-strikes-sombre-tone-as-k-line-turns-100/ 73, Mike ab3ap From k1px at msn.com Fri Apr 5 21:05:53 2019 From: k1px at msn.com (Jim Monahan) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 01:05:53 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] FS: KPA500 Message-ID: For sale: KPA 500 S/N 1682 which was purchased in May 2017. It is in perfect working condition and, currently, wired for 220/240 VAC. It can be changed to 120 VAC externally with switching the fuse box. Both power cords and a spare fan are included plus the manual. The price is $1,775 which includes the original box, shipping via USPS Priority Mail, tracking number and insurance. Money order or check is acceptable. PayPal OK plus the 3% fee ($1,828.) Jim, K1PX K1PX at msn.com From vr2xmc at yahoo.com.hk Fri Apr 5 21:16:47 2019 From: vr2xmc at yahoo.com.hk (Johnny Siu) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 01:16:47 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] Time flies References: <1433170604.665597.1554513407332.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1433170604.665597.1554513407332@mail.yahoo.com> Hello Group, Time flies, I have been absent from the air for some time.? Recently, I tried to contact Lisa of elecraft to order some small items as my son will soon travel to NYC. I was given to know that Lisa had already retired and her successor is now Margaret. I just wonder whether my favorite support advisers Gary and Howard are still with elecraft. 73 Johnny VR2XMC From donwilh at embarqmail.com Fri Apr 5 22:03:03 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 22:03:03 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Time flies In-Reply-To: <1433170604.665597.1554513407332@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1433170604.665597.1554513407332.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1433170604.665597.1554513407332@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Johnny, If you are looking for sales, the contacts are Madelyn and Michelle - sales @elecraft.com - they will handle your order. Both Gary and Howard have retired. The main support people are now Doug and Rob - use support at elecraft.com 73, Don W3FPR On 4/5/2019 9:16 PM, Johnny Siu via Elecraft wrote: > Hello Group, > Time flies, I have been absent from the air for some time.? Recently, I tried to contact Lisa of elecraft to order some small items as my son will soon travel to NYC. > I was given to know that Lisa had already retired and her successor is now Margaret. > I just wonder whether my favorite support advisers Gary and Howard are still with elecraft. From w7aqk at cox.net Fri Apr 5 22:08:20 2019 From: w7aqk at cox.net (w7aqk) Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 19:08:20 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] OT (maybe): Bouvet expedition safely back Message-ID: <6E2E704B31074E60912BDB65D67BB0F6@LAPTOPEPVQLR1I> Hi All, I read the Captain's letter with great interest. It certainly appears the group was subjected to some extremely severe conditions. I get the impression the Captain is almost apologizing, and I have to wonder why, unless they were possibly a bit too aggressive about certain things. In any event, this seems to have been "the DXpedition from hell"! Lots of problems, several delays, and an enormous amount of energy being expended just to operate from an island that apparently isn't fit for inhabitation! Apparently the stars have to line up just right for them to even go ashore!!! I really enjoy chasing DX, and working a lot of these DXpeditions to exotic places, but some places seem to be TOO exotic (as in dangerous!) in my view! I still shake my head a bit when I look at pictures from that last Kingman Reef DXpedition, where they operated from a pile of rocks!! I've been amazed at how involved this operation has been. As an example, take a look below at a posting the group made back in January: "Update Jan,2: WE?RE AWARE WE START TO FACE A SITUATION THE MOST SUITABLE AND SAFE WEATHER PERMITTING SEASON TO REACH BOUVET ISLAND IS ABOUT TO SLIP AWAY. NEVERTHELESS, WE?RE IN SOUTH AFRICA SINCE THE LAST DAYS OF OCTOBER, TRYING SO HARD, SACRIFICING OUR FAMILY TIME, JOBS, MONEY AND OTHER RESOURCES TO MAKE IT ALL HAPPEN FOR YOU, DXERS." Apparently some, or all, of them have been down in South Africa for nearly 6 months!! That's incredible! All that "sacrificing" they refer to above seems like a hell of a lot to pay for us to get some contacts with Bouvet. Is is really worth it?? They are actually putting themselves at great risk, and I have to question the justification for doing so. They have even had to take "cold water rescue training", which sounds terribly dangerous. I'm no meteorologist, but I'm assuming the time has passed for any further attempt this year. It's spring here, so it's fall there, and the WX can only get worse I assume. They have said it is postponed, and not cancelled, but they haven't indicated if that means postponed until next season. I think I hope so. Dave W7AQK From a.durbin at msn.com Sat Apr 6 09:40:49 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 13:40:49 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 keyed with no drive In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: In one off-line reply I was asked why the temperature rose to 50 deg C. With a room temperature of about 25 deg C the temperature of my KPA500 PA module when not keyed runs about 34 deg C. Measured PA dissipation when keyed with no drive is 40.75 W. It seems reasonable that 40.75 W could raise the PA module temperature from 34 deg C to the fan 1 trip temperature of 50 deg C. The irony is that my Arduino data logger records KPA500 temperature at 3 different locations. Had it been running I would have recorded some interesting data. However, it was the fact that it lost power that caused the event. Now, of course, I'm tempted to repeat the event with the logger running. 73, Andy, k3wyc From bdeuby at gmail.com Sat Apr 6 14:01:33 2019 From: bdeuby at gmail.com (wmbrian) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 11:01:33 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR Message-ID: <1554573693590-0.post@n2.nabble.com> I recently added the KAT500 and KPA500 to my K3 station. I have noticed that when the SWR (after tuning) as displayed on the KPA500 is 1.0/1 (or occasionally 1.1/1) no SWR LED lights up on the KAT500. (The green 1.0/1 SWR LED on the KPA500 does light up.) I have assumed that the 1.2/1 KAT500 SWR LED does not light up is because 1) the KAT500 threshold for the first SWR LED is 1.2/1 and 2) because no tuning action has taken place in these circumstances (due to memorized KAT500 tuning configuration). However, I noticed at the bottom of page 49 of Fred Cady's book on the KAT500 and the KPA500 it says "VSWR is displayed even when the tuner is bypasssed". So, I'm confused. Does no SWR LED light when the SWR is 1.0/1 (or very close to it) because the SWR is below 1.2/1? Thanks, Brian, K8GRR -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From k6dgw at foothill.net Sat Apr 6 14:37:27 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 11:37:27 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: K Line's 100th In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <37a1ab40-63ff-a497-feae-28303a02da62@foothill.net> We lived in Auburn CA for 38 years and the transcontinental Union Pacific goes right through town [we lived about 1/4 mile from both tracks].? The eastbound track crosses I-80 at the south end of town on a very high trestle.? Just after Elecraft had coined the term "K-Line," I saw a container train on the trestle with a bunch of "K-Line" containers.? First thought was that Elecraft sales had exploded in volume to fill that many shipping containers.? I emailed Eric and asked if their product name might be a trademark infringement on the Japanese company. He explained that trademarks are registered by business sector and the Elecraft K-line was safe since Elecraft wasn't a shipping company and Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha didn't make ham radios. Those same tracks run through Sparks NV where we now live.? Nevada has no inventory tax on wholesale goods, so we have a huge number of distribution centers [like Amazon], and I see those K-Line container trains and trucks with triple trailers all the time and occasionally imagine them filled with "real" K-lines. 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/5/2019 6:00 PM, Mike Markowski wrote: > Google does a pretty good job of bringing up things on my phone that I'm > interested in. But I got a smile when this one showed up. Nothing is > infallible, even machine learning. :-) > > https://splash247.com/new-boss-strikes-sombre-tone-as-k-line-turns-100/ > > 73, > Mike ab3ap > From rmcgraw at blomand.net Sat Apr 6 14:59:39 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 13:59:39 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR In-Reply-To: <1554573693590-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1554573693590-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Yes I have that combination, KPA500 / KAT500. Over the years I've learned that a VSWR of 1.5:1 or less means little to nothing. Oh it's "comforting" to operate all the time with a 1.1:1 SWR but just accurate is that indication? And the fact the two devices show different values lends credence to " just how accurate is that indication". Plus many diode detection methods are least accurate at lower levels. Conclusion: find something more interesting to worry about. Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 6, 2019, at 1:01 PM, wmbrian wrote: > > I recently added the KAT500 and KPA500 to my K3 station. > > I have noticed that when the SWR (after tuning) as displayed on the KPA500 > is 1.0/1 (or occasionally 1.1/1) no SWR LED lights up on the KAT500. (The > green 1.0/1 SWR LED on the KPA500 does light up.) > > I have assumed that the 1.2/1 KAT500 SWR LED does not light up is because 1) > the KAT500 threshold for the first SWR LED is 1.2/1 and 2) because no > tuning action has taken place in these circumstances (due to memorized > KAT500 tuning configuration). However, I noticed at the bottom of page 49 > of Fred Cady's book on the KAT500 and the KPA500 it says "VSWR is displayed > even when the tuner is bypasssed". So, I'm confused. Does no SWR LED light > when the SWR is 1.0/1 (or very close to it) because the SWR is below 1.2/1? > > Thanks, > > Brian, K8GRR > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From k9yeq at live.com Sat Apr 6 16:13:27 2019 From: k9yeq at live.com (Bill Johnson) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 20:13:27 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR In-Reply-To: <1554573693590-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1554573693590-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Does the power output LEDs give a reading? If they do and you show no reflected that should be ok. If you have a bride after that it may show no lite either. You can always bypass the KPA's and find a frequency where you see 2:1 then turn the KPA's back on and see if that gives a reading. If not, suggest you call tech support. 72 & 73, Bill K9YEQ FT'er for K2, KX1, KX3, KXPA100, KAT500, W2, etc. -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of wmbrian Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2019 1:02 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR I recently added the KAT500 and KPA500 to my K3 station. I have noticed that when the SWR (after tuning) as displayed on the KPA500 is 1.0/1 (or occasionally 1.1/1) no SWR LED lights up on the KAT500. (The green 1.0/1 SWR LED on the KPA500 does light up.) I have assumed that the 1.2/1 KAT500 SWR LED does not light up is because 1) the KAT500 threshold for the first SWR LED is 1.2/1 and 2) because no tuning action has taken place in these circumstances (due to memorized KAT500 tuning configuration). However, I noticed at the bottom of page 49 of Fred Cady's book on the KAT500 and the KPA500 it says "VSWR is displayed even when the tuner is bypasssed". So, I'm confused. Does no SWR LED light when the SWR is 1.0/1 (or very close to it) because the SWR is below 1.2/1? Thanks, Brian, K8GRR -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rmcgraw at blomand.net Sat Apr 6 17:04:09 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 16:04:09 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR In-Reply-To: References: <1554573693590-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <45D06C57-0054-446F-86D4-3A71260141C6@blomand.net> The SWR LED scaling on the KPA500 is different than the scaling on the KAT500. Yet the KPA500 does have a numerical readout......if one wishes to split hairs. 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and etc. With LED type displays, there is always a "transition" point from one value / LED to the next. It could be at 1.4, or 1.5 or 1.6. Thus a value of 1.4 on one device could be 1.6 on another. Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 6, 2019, at 3:13 PM, Bill Johnson wrote: > > Does the power output LEDs give a reading? If they do and you show no reflected that should be ok. If you have a bride after that it may show no lite either. You can always bypass the KPA's and find a frequency where you see 2:1 then turn the KPA's back on and see if that gives a reading. If not, suggest you call tech support. > > 72 & 73, > Bill > K9YEQ > FT'er for K2, KX1, KX3, KXPA100, KAT500, W2, etc. > > -----Original Message----- > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of wmbrian > Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2019 1:02 PM > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR > > I recently added the KAT500 and KPA500 to my K3 station. > > I have noticed that when the SWR (after tuning) as displayed on the KPA500 is 1.0/1 (or occasionally 1.1/1) no SWR LED lights up on the KAT500. (The green 1.0/1 SWR LED on the KPA500 does light up.) > > I have assumed that the 1.2/1 KAT500 SWR LED does not light up is because 1) the KAT500 threshold for the first SWR LED is 1.2/1 and 2) because no tuning action has taken place in these circumstances (due to memorized > KAT500 tuning configuration). However, I noticed at the bottom of page 49 of Fred Cady's book on the KAT500 and the KPA500 it says "VSWR is displayed even when the tuner is bypasssed". So, I'm confused. Does no SWR LED light when the SWR is 1.0/1 (or very close to it) because the SWR is below 1.2/1? > > Thanks, > > Brian, K8GRR > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From k9yeq at live.com Sat Apr 6 17:11:05 2019 From: k9yeq at live.com (Bill Johnson) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 21:11:05 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR In-Reply-To: <45D06C57-0054-446F-86D4-3A71260141C6@blomand.net> References: <1554573693590-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <45D06C57-0054-446F-86D4-3A71260141C6@blomand.net> Message-ID: Bob, thanks for input, but I understand the issue as to not get a reading on the SWR display of the KTA500 and the concern is there may be something amiss. Thus my suggestion to be sure the SWR LED is working and to figure it out, I suggested a simple method to make sure the LED on the SWR indicator can register/is working. 73, Bill K9YEQ https://wrj-tech.com/ -----Original Message----- From: Bob McGraw K4TAX Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2019 4:04 PM To: Bill Johnson Cc: wmbrian ; elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR The SWR LED scaling on the KPA500 is different than the scaling on the KAT500. Yet the KPA500 does have a numerical readout......if one wishes to split hairs. 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and etc. With LED type displays, there is always a "transition" point from one value / LED to the next. It could be at 1.4, or 1.5 or 1.6. Thus a value of 1.4 on one device could be 1.6 on another. Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 6, 2019, at 3:13 PM, Bill Johnson wrote: > > Does the power output LEDs give a reading? If they do and you show no reflected that should be ok. If you have a bride after that it may show no lite either. You can always bypass the KPA's and find a frequency where you see 2:1 then turn the KPA's back on and see if that gives a reading. If not, suggest you call tech support. > > 72 & 73, > Bill > K9YEQ > FT'er for K2, KX1, KX3, KXPA100, KAT500, W2, etc. > > -----Original Message----- > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net > On Behalf Of wmbrian > Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2019 1:02 PM > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR > > I recently added the KAT500 and KPA500 to my K3 station. > > I have noticed that when the SWR (after tuning) as displayed on the > KPA500 is 1.0/1 (or occasionally 1.1/1) no SWR LED lights up on the > KAT500. (The green 1.0/1 SWR LED on the KPA500 does light up.) > > I have assumed that the 1.2/1 KAT500 SWR LED does not light up is > because 1) the KAT500 threshold for the first SWR LED is 1.2/1 and 2) > because no tuning action has taken place in these circumstances (due > to memorized > KAT500 tuning configuration). However, I noticed at the bottom of page 49 of Fred Cady's book on the KAT500 and the KPA500 it says "VSWR is displayed even when the tuner is bypasssed". So, I'm confused. Does no SWR LED light when the SWR is 1.0/1 (or very close to it) because the SWR is below 1.2/1? > > Thanks, > > Brian, K8GRR > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From softblue at windstream.net Sat Apr 6 17:12:10 2019 From: softblue at windstream.net (Dick Dickinson) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 17:12:10 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Feature Request Message-ID: <001101d4ecbd$66463c00$32d2b400$@windstream.net> Sticky Noise Blanker.through on/off cycle and band changes. Dick - KA5KKT From wa6nhc at gmail.com Sat Apr 6 17:16:34 2019 From: wa6nhc at gmail.com (Rick Bates (WA6NHC)) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 14:16:34 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Feature Request In-Reply-To: <001101d4ecbd$66463c00$32d2b400$@windstream.net> References: <001101d4ecbd$66463c00$32d2b400$@windstream.net> Message-ID: Sticky timer; turn the K3 on at a set time each day. Rick WA6NHC Smell Czech correction happens > On Apr 6, 2019, at 2:12 PM, Dick Dickinson wrote: > > Sticky Noise Blanker.through on/off cycle and band changes. > > > > > > Dick - KA5KKT > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From dick at elecraft.com Sat Apr 6 17:35:53 2019 From: dick at elecraft.com (dick at elecraft.com) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 14:35:53 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR In-Reply-To: <1554573693590-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1554573693590-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <000b01d4ecc0$b6a35360$23e9fa20$@elecraft.com> Brian: Your KAT500 low order SWR LED, labeled "1.2", is illuminated when there is a little bit of forward power and an SWR of 1.2:1 or higher is computed. If the SWR is under 1.2:1, then no KAT500 SWR LEDs are illuminated. Even 500 watts of RF with little or no reflected power shouldn't light any KAT500 SWR LEDs. The KPA500 (and KPA1500) have an SWR bar LED for 1.0. The KAT500's first SWR LED is 1.2. Fred's book is correct; your KAT500 performs an SWR calculation whether or not the ATU is bypassed. That result can be displayed with the KAT500 Utility Operate page, or any other program that can send a command to the KAT500 to read its SWR. If SWR is 1.2:1 or higher, then it's also displayed on KAT500 SWR LEDs. 73 de Dick, K6KR -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of wmbrian Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2019 11:02 To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR I recently added the KAT500 and KPA500 to my K3 station. I have noticed that when the SWR (after tuning) as displayed on the KPA500 is 1.0/1 (or occasionally 1.1/1) no SWR LED lights up on the KAT500. (The green 1.0/1 SWR LED on the KPA500 does light up.) I have assumed that the 1.2/1 KAT500 SWR LED does not light up is because 1) the KAT500 threshold for the first SWR LED is 1.2/1 and 2) because no tuning action has taken place in these circumstances (due to memorized KAT500 tuning configuration). However, I noticed at the bottom of page 49 of Fred Cady's book on the KAT500 and the KPA500 it says "VSWR is displayed even when the tuner is bypasssed". So, I'm confused. Does no SWR LED light when the SWR is 1.0/1 (or very close to it) because the SWR is below 1.2/1? Thanks, Brian, K8GRR -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From k9yeq at live.com Sat Apr 6 17:41:12 2019 From: k9yeq at live.com (Bill Johnson) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 21:41:12 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR In-Reply-To: <000b01d4ecc0$b6a35360$23e9fa20$@elecraft.com> References: <1554573693590-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <000b01d4ecc0$b6a35360$23e9fa20$@elecraft.com> Message-ID: Dick, thank you for jumping in. Has been a long time since I used the KAT500 now that KPA1500 is in the shack! 72 & 73, Bill K9YEQ FT'er for K2, KX1, KX3, KXPA100, KAT500, W2, etc. -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of dick at elecraft.com Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2019 4:36 PM To: 'wmbrian' ; elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR Brian: Your KAT500 low order SWR LED, labeled "1.2", is illuminated when there is a little bit of forward power and an SWR of 1.2:1 or higher is computed. If the SWR is under 1.2:1, then no KAT500 SWR LEDs are illuminated. Even 500 watts of RF with little or no reflected power shouldn't light any KAT500 SWR LEDs. The KPA500 (and KPA1500) have an SWR bar LED for 1.0. The KAT500's first SWR LED is 1.2. Fred's book is correct; your KAT500 performs an SWR calculation whether or not the ATU is bypassed. That result can be displayed with the KAT500 Utility Operate page, or any other program that can send a command to the KAT500 to read its SWR. If SWR is 1.2:1 or higher, then it's also displayed on KAT500 SWR LEDs. 73 de Dick, K6KR -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of wmbrian Sent: Saturday, April 6, 2019 11:02 To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR I recently added the KAT500 and KPA500 to my K3 station. I have noticed that when the SWR (after tuning) as displayed on the KPA500 is 1.0/1 (or occasionally 1.1/1) no SWR LED lights up on the KAT500. (The green 1.0/1 SWR LED on the KPA500 does light up.) I have assumed that the 1.2/1 KAT500 SWR LED does not light up is because 1) the KAT500 threshold for the first SWR LED is 1.2/1 and 2) because no tuning action has taken place in these circumstances (due to memorized KAT500 tuning configuration). However, I noticed at the bottom of page 49 of Fred Cady's book on the KAT500 and the KPA500 it says "VSWR is displayed even when the tuner is bypasssed". So, I'm confused. Does no SWR LED light when the SWR is 1.0/1 (or very close to it) because the SWR is below 1.2/1? Thanks, Brian, K8GRR -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From a.durbin at msn.com Sat Apr 6 17:56:00 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 21:56:00 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR Message-ID: "I have noticed that when the SWR (after tuning) as displayed on the KPA500 is 1.0/1 (or occasionally 1.1/1) no SWR LED lights up on the KAT500. (The green 1.0/1 SWR LED on the KPA500 does light up.)" That's normal. Why would you expect a 1.2 SWR LED to be lit when the SWR value is less than 1.2? The range of the KPA500 LED SWR display is much greater that the range of the KAT500 LED SWR display. Also, neither of them will give a useful reading at low power levels. I suggest the LP-100A if you really want to know the load presented by your antenna system. It will give useful complex load information with power levels between 1 watt and legal limit. The fact that the two LED SWR meters have different ranges, and different step points, may be by design. If the LED meters were identical people would perhaps expect them to always display the same value. Don't forget that SWR is a poor indicator of antenna system load and the KPA500 really dislikes low R loads even if the SWR is less than 1.5:1. 73, Andy. k3wyc From eric.csuf at gmail.com Sat Apr 6 18:24:08 2019 From: eric.csuf at gmail.com (EricJ) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 15:24:08 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Selling T1 and XG3 Message-ID: <9193ffbf-0008-c7a3-9a31-ce837cfe4ac1@gmail.com> Elecraft T1 Antenna Tuner $120 incl. priority mail shipping. Used with dozens of QRP kits which I no longer build. Once used with my K2/10 when the internal KAT2 went Tango Uniform on a camping trip. Very versatile. Fast, tiny and tough. Includes original printed manual. Elecraft XG3 RF Signal Source $170 incl. priority mail shipping. Used on the bench under computer control until I replaced it with a more suitable bench signal generator (larger...with knobs). Used it to align K1, K2, and a variety of boat anchor receivers. Includes special serial cable and original printed manual. Both units purchased factory assembled. Excellent condition. Photos at: https://photos.app.goo.gl/Ngv6h2DuvnaFpSUi9 Free priority mail shipping to US only. Paypal preferred to email below. Ships immediately after payment is received. Contact me off-list. Semi-active on this list for years. Current info at QRZ.com. Eric KE6US eric_csuf at hotmail.com From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sat Apr 6 18:27:52 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 18:27:52 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KAT500 SWR LED Doesn't Light with 1.0/1 SWR In-Reply-To: <45D06C57-0054-446F-86D4-3A71260141C6@blomand.net> References: <1554573693590-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <45D06C57-0054-446F-86D4-3A71260141C6@blomand.net> Message-ID: <42a9aa1e-80f4-1e1c-4e21-2489d079d112@embarqmail.com> All, To amplify Bob's comments --- That is one of the situations with digital displays Vs. analog. An analog display might show your an SWR of 1.55 (if you can interpolate the needle position) while the digital display resolution will show you either a 1.5 or a 1.6 indication - there is no way to show an in-between reading on a digital display. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/6/2019 5:04 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > The SWR LED scaling on the KPA500 is different than the scaling on the KAT500. Yet the KPA500 does have a numerical readout......if one wishes to split hairs. 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 and etc. > > With LED type displays, there is always a "transition" point from one value / LED to the next. It could be at 1.4, or 1.5 or 1.6. Thus a value of 1.4 on one device could be 1.6 on another. > From eric.csuf at gmail.com Sat Apr 6 18:40:04 2019 From: eric.csuf at gmail.com (EricJ) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 15:40:04 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] LP-PAN 2 Panadapter with Z10000 for K2 Message-ID: <9d27ee7b-089f-78a2-e4a0-81af257f7fba@gmail.com> Originally an LP-PAN, but upgraded to LP-PAN 2. No extraneous holes or mods. Includes: LP-PAN 2 Z10000 buffer amp optimized for K2 BNC-SMA cable to connect K2 to LP-PAN Manual pdf's on DVD Photos here: https://photos.app.goo.gl/zRkmEw7V8ztjrALM8 See telepostinc.com for easy installation, current software and sound card recommendations. $150 including priority mail shipping to US only. Paypal preferred to email below. Ships immediately after payment is received. Contact me off-list. Semi-active on this list for years. Current info at QRZ.com. Eric KE6US eric_csuf at hotmail.com From ae0mm at protonmail.com Sat Apr 6 18:56:26 2019 From: ae0mm at protonmail.com (AE0MM) Date: Sat, 06 Apr 2019 22:56:26 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] FS: KX3 + PX3 Message-ID: KX3-K S/N 6480 $1175 (including shipping up to $25) Includes: KXAT3 KXFL3 KX3-2M-AT-3 KXUSB I/Q Cable E980232 IO Module E850775 Power Cable PX3-K S/N 1978 $440 (including shipping up to $20) Includes: PX3CBL E850775 Power Cable Paypal preferred. Thanks, Mark / ae0mm From km6cq at km6cq.com Sat Apr 6 21:23:42 2019 From: km6cq at km6cq.com (Dan Baker) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 18:23:42 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia Vivid Visual Previews? Message-ID: Just looking for a picture that shows a small piece of real estate on something that we have not seen before from our favorite radio company. Just a piece. Thanks, Dan KM6CQ -- Sent from my iPhone X From alan at wilcoxengineering.com Sat Apr 6 21:27:00 2019 From: alan at wilcoxengineering.com (Alan D. Wilcox) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 21:27:00 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Tuneup, Rescue, Build your K2 and others Message-ID: Hello, Does your K2 need repair? Tuneup? Want to sell it, but it needs some attention before offering it for sale? In addition to tuning your rig, I can also rescue a building project you might have started some time ago. See what my clients have said about my construction and service work at http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/6768 Photos of the popular "Twins" -- the KPA100 and KAT100 in EC2 enclosure -- are at https://wilcoxengineering.com/kpa100-in-ec2/ Cheers, Alan Alan D. Wilcox, W3DVX (K2-5373, K3-40) 570-916-9590 (cell, text) http://amazon.com/author/alandwilcox Williamsport, PA 17701 From ae0mm at protonmail.com Sat Apr 6 22:26:45 2019 From: ae0mm at protonmail.com (AE0MM) Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 02:26:45 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] FS: KX3 + PX3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9kDPujXjwA_K6_ZzWlYPhhloYclykdlTgsgytVUylsCwJ6FPQDbrWMD82zKLtGDXlpEN6kiL-m2CVG23Tiy5-uiL_8kJvMEsAGr1eU6yvaU=@protonmail.com> Sold. --ae0mm ??????? Original Message ??????? On Saturday, April 6, 2019 5:56 PM, AE0MM via Elecraft wrote: > KX3-K S/N 6480 > $1175 (including shipping up to $25) > Includes: > KXAT3 > KXFL3 > KX3-2M-AT-3 > KXUSB > I/Q Cable > E980232 IO Module > E850775 Power Cable > > PX3-K S/N 1978 > $440 (including shipping up to $20) > Includes: > PX3CBL > E850775 Power Cable > > Paypal preferred. > > Thanks, > Mark / ae0mm > > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From kevinr at coho.net Sat Apr 6 23:52:55 2019 From: kevinr at coho.net (kevinr) Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 20:52:55 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Announcement Message-ID: <0775d0c2-dfa6-5155-3db9-d7c48251af10@coho.net> Good Evening, ?? After a rainy week we had a break.? And then more rain.? The weather is back to normal.? Peaceful gloom and the sound of rain drops.? The moss is glowing.? The sun is slightly more active. Who knows how that will effect the ionosphere?? We can find out tomorrow. Please join us on: 14050 kHz at 2200z Sunday (3 PM PDT Sunday) ?7047 kHz at 0000z Monday (5 PM PDT Sunday) 73, Kevin. KD5ONS _ From davidjw1 at cinci.rr.com Sun Apr 7 10:09:04 2019 From: davidjw1 at cinci.rr.com (David Windisch) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 07:09:04 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] WTB: KAT500 Message-ID: <1554646144544-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Hello all concerned: WTB: KAT500; pls reply off list, tks. Brgds, Dave, N3HE 9750-153-315 (read right to left ) or moc.rr.icnic. at 1wjdivad right to left ----- Brgds, Dave, N3HE Cincinnati OH -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From k9ztv at socket.net Sun Apr 7 11:26:12 2019 From: k9ztv at socket.net (KENT TRIMBLE) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 10:26:12 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ Message-ID: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> Ozarkcon yesterday. Break-time.? Pile of MFJ catalogs on a table.? Took one back to my seat to kill time.? Opened it up to the second page and in the lower left corner is a box-ad with the following: "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig.? MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 transceiver.? MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft K3 10 Watt or 100 Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz.? This automatic antenna tuner PC board features an L-Match design and can match SWR up to 10:1. It handles 100 Watts.? The ATU PC board has a second antenna port, and a sub-rx SMA port.? All antenna ports are protected with gas discharge tubes.? Super sensitive relay allows excellent low current drain.? MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 1/4D inches and easily slides right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs less than 1/2 pound.? Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and save $$$!" What in the world is that all about?? What possible market are they shooting at?? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? Someone enlighten me!? Did I sleep through April 1st? https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 73, Kent? K9ZTV --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From n6kr at elecraft.com Sun Apr 7 11:48:34 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 08:48:34 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> Message-ID: I'll be keeping my K3S 100% stock, thank you. Wayne N6KR > On Apr 7, 2019, at 8:26 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote: > > Ozarkcon yesterday. Break-time. Pile of MFJ catalogs on a table. Took one back to my seat to kill time. Opened it up to the second page and in the lower left corner is a box-ad with the following: > > > "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig. MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 transceiver. MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft K3 10 Watt or 100 Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz. This automatic antenna tuner PC board features an L-Match design and can match SWR up to 10:1. It handles 100 Watts. The ATU PC board has a second antenna port, and a sub-rx SMA port. All antenna ports are protected with gas discharge tubes. Super sensitive relay allows excellent low current drain. MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 1/4D inches and easily slides right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs less than 1/2 pound. Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and save $$$!" > > > What in the world is that all about? What possible market are they shooting at? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? > > Someone enlighten me! Did I sleep through April 1st? > > https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 > > 73, > > Kent K9ZTV From doug at kj0f.com Sun Apr 7 12:00:29 2019 From: doug at kj0f.com (Doug Person) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 11:00:29 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> Message-ID: <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> MFJ has been a leader in automatic tuner technology for years. It was probably a very simple engineering process for them to use what they have to create a K3 tuner. You may have a dislike of MFJ products. But, that doesn't preclude the fact that their tuners work very well. They have been selling the K3 tuner for years. It doesn't seem the least bit surprising given the modular nature of the K3 and the long history MFJ has with automatic tuner technology. Maybe it's actually a complement to Elecraft that MFJ takes the K3 so seriously. Doug --KJ?F On 4/7/2019 10:26 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote: > Ozarkcon yesterday. Break-time.? Pile of MFJ catalogs on a table.? > Took one back to my seat to kill time.? Opened it up to the second > page and in the lower left corner is a box-ad with the following: > > > "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig.? MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of > the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 > transceiver.? MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft > K3 10 Watt or 100 Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz.? This automatic > antenna tuner PC board features an L-Match design and can match SWR up > to 10:1. It handles 100 Watts.? The ATU PC board has a second antenna > port, and a sub-rx SMA port.? All antenna ports are protected with gas > discharge tubes.? Super sensitive relay allows excellent low current > drain.? MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 1/4D inches and easily slides > right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs less than 1/2 pound.? > Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and save $$$!" > > > What in the world is that all about?? What possible market are they > shooting at?? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? > > Someone enlighten me!? Did I sleep through April 1st? > > https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 > > 73, > > Kent? K9ZTV > > > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- 73 de Doug -- KJ0F From g0kla at arrl.net Sun Apr 7 12:01:10 2019 From: g0kla at arrl.net (g0kla) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 09:01:10 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] [K2] ALC and power control on 40m SSB in K2/100 In-Reply-To: <1289258154200-5719064.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1289258154200-5719064.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1554652870150-0.post@n2.nabble.com> This is an old thread, but is something that I have struggled with on my own K2. I also had some RF feedback that was mixed with this, but I have cured that. So now I am left with the very similar symptoms where there are too many ALC lights lit for 40m and it overdrives my KPA500. I had to play with SSBA, which I would set to 1 on 40m and 2 on 20m. But even with SSBA set to 1 I get much to much power on 40m for the amplifier. I am using the MH2 mic. I went through the checks. I have the new PA. There are only 1-2 ALC bars lit on 20m and 15m. There are typically 7 lit on 40m. With SSBA set to 1 the voltage at KSB2 U1 pin 10 was not near zero. It was 2.5V. I checked the values and soldering of R14 and R15 and all looked ok. As were the other components listed. Thinking that the incorrect voltage means that I should change the component values I updated R9 to 15k and added a 1k between the base of Q1 and P1 pin 6. The voltage is now near zero, but it has not improved things. I still need to use SSBA 2 for 20m otherwise the drive is low. But SSBA 1 on 40m has too much drive. As soon as the KPA100 clicks in (as I turn from 10-11Watts) the amp is over driven. Any suggestions? 73 Chris ac2cz / g0kla -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From kengkopp at gmail.com Sun Apr 7 12:11:06 2019 From: kengkopp at gmail.com (Ken G Kopp) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 10:11:06 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> Message-ID: Wonder if it's held in the K3 with hot glue like they use to hold the panel meters in their antenna tuners .... have seen this in a tuner purchased by a friend. 73 ! K0PP On Sun, Apr 7, 2019, 10:01 Doug Person wrote: > MFJ has been a leader in automatic tuner technology for years. It was > probably a very simple engineering process for them to use what they > have to create a K3 tuner. You may have a dislike of MFJ products. But, > that doesn't preclude the fact that their tuners work very well. They > have been selling the K3 tuner for years. It doesn't seem the least bit > surprising given the modular nature of the K3 and the long history MFJ > has with automatic tuner technology. Maybe it's actually a complement to > Elecraft that MFJ takes the K3 so seriously. > > Doug --KJ?F > > On 4/7/2019 10:26 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote: > > Ozarkcon yesterday. Break-time. Pile of MFJ catalogs on a table. > > Took one back to my seat to kill time. Opened it up to the second > > page and in the lower left corner is a box-ad with the following: > > > > > > "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig. MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of > > the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 > > transceiver. MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft > > K3 10 Watt or 100 Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz. This automatic > > antenna tuner PC board features an L-Match design and can match SWR up > > to 10:1. It handles 100 Watts. The ATU PC board has a second antenna > > port, and a sub-rx SMA port. All antenna ports are protected with gas > > discharge tubes. Super sensitive relay allows excellent low current > > drain. MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 1/4D inches and easily slides > > right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs less than 1/2 pound. > > Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and save $$$!" > > > > > > What in the world is that all about? What possible market are they > > shooting at? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? > > > > Someone enlighten me! Did I sleep through April 1st? > > > > https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 > > > > 73, > > > > Kent K9ZTV > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > > https://www.avg.com > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > -- > 73 de Doug -- KJ0F > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From bill at wjschmidt.com Sun Apr 7 12:15:20 2019 From: bill at wjschmidt.com (Dr. William J. Schmidt) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 11:15:20 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> Message-ID: <10ca01d4ed5d$191b54b0$4b51fe10$@wjschmidt.com> There isn't really much in the way of smarts on the clone board. It's simply the tuner elements (coils and capacitors), a few relays, the relay driver chips, and gas tubes. The actual tuning smarts comes from elsewhere within the K3. This isn?t much of a stretch for a clone. -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Doug Person Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 11:00 AM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ MFJ has been a leader in automatic tuner technology for years. It was probably a very simple engineering process for them to use what they have to create a K3 tuner. You may have a dislike of MFJ products. But, that doesn't preclude the fact that their tuners work very well. They have been selling the K3 tuner for years. It doesn't seem the least bit surprising given the modular nature of the K3 and the long history MFJ has with automatic tuner technology. Maybe it's actually a complement to Elecraft that MFJ takes the K3 so seriously. Doug --KJ?F On 4/7/2019 10:26 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote: > Ozarkcon yesterday. Break-time. Pile of MFJ catalogs on a table. Took > one back to my seat to kill time. Opened it up to the second page and > in the lower left corner is a box-ad with the following: > > > "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig. MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of > the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 transceiver. > MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft > K3 10 Watt or 100 Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz. This automatic > antenna tuner PC board features an L-Match design and can match SWR up > to 10:1. It handles 100 Watts. The ATU PC board has a second antenna > port, and a sub-rx SMA port. All antenna ports are protected with gas > discharge tubes. Super sensitive relay allows excellent low current > drain. MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 1/4D inches and easily slides > right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs less than 1/2 pound. > Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and save $$$!" > > > What in the world is that all about? What possible market are they > shooting at? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? > > Someone enlighten me! Did I sleep through April 1st? > > https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 > > 73, > > Kent K9ZTV > > > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- 73 de Doug -- KJ0F ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From hk3j.dx at gmail.com Sun Apr 7 12:23:52 2019 From: hk3j.dx at gmail.com (German Duran) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 11:23:52 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <10ca01d4ed5d$191b54b0$4b51fe10$@wjschmidt.com> References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <10ca01d4ed5d$191b54b0$4b51fe10$@wjschmidt.com> Message-ID: I need an automatic tuner antenna for an ACOM A1000 amplifier. Does anyone know of any brand or dealer that sells this antenna tuner? Will MFJ release an automatic tuner antenna for 1000 watts? I hope some guidance response. Thank you. Dr. Germ?n Dur?n HK3J. Bogota Colombia Internist and Nephrologist and devoted ham. El dom., 7 abr. 2019 a las 11:15, Dr. William J. Schmidt (< bill at wjschmidt.com>) escribi?: > There isn't really much in the way of smarts on the clone board. It's > simply the tuner elements (coils and capacitors), a few relays, the relay > driver chips, and gas tubes. The actual tuning smarts comes from elsewhere > within the K3. This isn?t much of a stretch for a clone. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto: > elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Doug Person > Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 11:00 AM > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ > > MFJ has been a leader in automatic tuner technology for years. It was > probably a very simple engineering process for them to use what they have > to create a K3 tuner. You may have a dislike of MFJ products. But, that > doesn't preclude the fact that their tuners work very well. They have been > selling the K3 tuner for years. It doesn't seem the least bit surprising > given the modular nature of the K3 and the long history MFJ has with > automatic tuner technology. Maybe it's actually a complement to Elecraft > that MFJ takes the K3 so seriously. > > Doug --KJ?F > > On 4/7/2019 10:26 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote: > > Ozarkcon yesterday. Break-time. Pile of MFJ catalogs on a table. Took > > one back to my seat to kill time. Opened it up to the second page and > > in the lower left corner is a box-ad with the following: > > > > > > "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig. MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of > > the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 transceiver. > > MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft > > K3 10 Watt or 100 Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz. This automatic > > antenna tuner PC board features an L-Match design and can match SWR up > > to 10:1. It handles 100 Watts. The ATU PC board has a second antenna > > port, and a sub-rx SMA port. All antenna ports are protected with gas > > discharge tubes. Super sensitive relay allows excellent low current > > drain. MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 1/4D inches and easily slides > > right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs less than 1/2 pound. > > Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and save $$$!" > > > > > > What in the world is that all about? What possible market are they > > shooting at? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? > > > > Someone enlighten me! Did I sleep through April 1st? > > > > https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 > > > > 73, > > > > Kent K9ZTV > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > > https://www.avg.com > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > -- > 73 de Doug -- KJ0F > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From n6kr at elecraft.com Sun Apr 7 12:28:00 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 09:28:00 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> Message-ID: <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> I've used many MFJ products and in have had very little trouble with any of them. For example, I make frequent use an MFJ-223 hand-held VNA -- it's versatile and does the job. I've also used their manual tuners, antenna switches, and portable/mobile whips. They have a very comprehensive product line that's really unique in the industry. That said, I do have some suggestions for MFJ's engineering team on how they might improve their ATU. Looking at the photo, I see that they used much smaller toroidal cores for 5 of the 8 inductors in the L network. This could result in excessive heating, especially on the higher bands, at full power into a worst-case match. We specified T68 sized cores to remain conservative based on extensive testing. Also, if you click on the photo to see the details, you'll see what appears to be very inconsistent hand soldering of the SMD components. While this doesn't necessarily worsen performance or reliability, it should be done in a way that inspires confidence in the buyer. (Easy for me to say, of course. We have the luxury of mass-producing these assemblies using automated pick-and-place equipment at our fabricator in Monterey.) Wayne N6KR > On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Doug Person wrote: > > MFJ has been a leader in automatic tuner technology for years. It was probably a very simple engineering process for them to use what they have to create a K3 tuner. You may have a dislike of MFJ products. But, that doesn't preclude the fact that their tuners work very well. They have been selling the K3 tuner for years. It doesn't seem the least bit surprising given the modular nature of the K3 and the long history MFJ has with automatic tuner technology. Maybe it's actually a complement to Elecraft that MFJ takes the K3 so seriously. > > Doug --KJ?F > > On 4/7/2019 10:26 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote: >> Ozarkcon yesterday. Break-time. Pile of MFJ catalogs on a table. Took one back to my seat to kill time. Opened it up to the second page and in the lower left corner is a box-ad with the following: >> >> >> "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig. MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 transceiver. MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft K3 10 Watt or 100 Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz. This automatic antenna tuner PC board features an L-Match design and can match SWR up to 10:1. It handles 100 Watts. The ATU PC board has a second antenna port, and a sub-rx SMA port. All antenna ports are protected with gas discharge tubes. Super sensitive relay allows excellent low current drain. MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 1/4D inches and easily slides right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs less than 1/2 pound. Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and save $$$!" >> >> >> What in the world is that all about? What possible market are they shooting at? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? >> >> Someone enlighten me! Did I sleep through April 1st? >> >> https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 >> >> 73, >> >> Kent K9ZTV From n6kr at elecraft.com Sun Apr 7 12:32:03 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 09:32:03 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <10ca01d4ed5d$191b54b0$4b51fe10$@wjschmidt.com> References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <10ca01d4ed5d$191b54b0$4b51fe10$@wjschmidt.com> Message-ID: <8CC1FD14-4103-4DD8-9F82-521D00CAA117@elecraft.com> > On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:15 AM, Dr. William J. Schmidt wrote: > > There isn't really much in the way of smarts on the clone board. It's simply the tuner elements (coils and capacitors), a few relays, the relay driver chips, and gas tubes. The actual tuning smarts comes from elsewhere within the K3. This isn?t much of a stretch for a clone. > That's correct. The heart of any binary-weighted L-network ATU is in the firmware, which we've been improving since I first wrote the code for the KAT2. The latest incarnation of this code is in the KAT1500, the ATU included in the KPA1500 amp. My colleague K6KR has done a great job of tweaking the algorithm to eek out that last tenth of an SWR unit on every match. Wayne N6KR > > -----Original Message----- > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Doug Person > Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 11:00 AM > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ > > MFJ has been a leader in automatic tuner technology for years. It was probably a very simple engineering process for them to use what they have to create a K3 tuner. You may have a dislike of MFJ products. But, that doesn't preclude the fact that their tuners work very well. They have been selling the K3 tuner for years. It doesn't seem the least bit surprising given the modular nature of the K3 and the long history MFJ has with automatic tuner technology. Maybe it's actually a complement to Elecraft that MFJ takes the K3 so seriously. > > Doug --KJ?F > > On 4/7/2019 10:26 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote: >> Ozarkcon yesterday. Break-time. Pile of MFJ catalogs on a table. Took >> one back to my seat to kill time. Opened it up to the second page and >> in the lower left corner is a box-ad with the following: >> >> >> "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig. MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of >> the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 transceiver. >> MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft >> K3 10 Watt or 100 Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz. This automatic >> antenna tuner PC board features an L-Match design and can match SWR up >> to 10:1. It handles 100 Watts. The ATU PC board has a second antenna >> port, and a sub-rx SMA port. All antenna ports are protected with gas >> discharge tubes. Super sensitive relay allows excellent low current >> drain. MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 1/4D inches and easily slides >> right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs less than 1/2 pound. >> Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and save $$$!" >> >> >> What in the world is that all about? What possible market are they >> shooting at? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? >> >> Someone enlighten me! Did I sleep through April 1st? >> >> https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 >> >> 73, >> >> Kent K9ZTV From w6png at yahoo.com Sun Apr 7 12:35:11 2019 From: w6png at yahoo.com (Paul Gacek) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 09:35:11 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] LP-PAN 2 Panadapter with Z10000 for K2 In-Reply-To: <9d27ee7b-089f-78a2-e4a0-81af257f7fba@gmail.com> References: <9d27ee7b-089f-78a2-e4a0-81af257f7fba@gmail.com> Message-ID: <7F7517A3-A631-47D3-A37E-5B9BD3345B7B@yahoo.com> Eric I am interested and have emailed you a couple of times off list as you suggested. If the items are sold please let me know. Paul W6PNG/M0SNA www.nomadic.blog > On Apr 6, 2019, at 3:40 PM, EricJ wrote: > > Originally an LP-PAN, but upgraded to LP-PAN 2. > No extraneous holes or mods. > > Includes: > LP-PAN 2 > Z10000 buffer amp optimized for K2 > BNC-SMA cable to connect K2 to LP-PAN > Manual pdf's on DVD > > Photos here: > https://photos.app.goo.gl/zRkmEw7V8ztjrALM8 > > See telepostinc.com for easy installation, current software and sound card recommendations. > > $150 including priority mail shipping to US only. > > Paypal preferred to email below. Ships immediately after payment is received. > > Contact me off-list. Semi-active on this list for years. Current info at QRZ.com. > > Eric KE6US > eric_csuf at hotmail.com > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From kengkopp at gmail.com Sun Apr 7 12:35:10 2019 From: kengkopp at gmail.com (Ken G Kopp) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 10:35:10 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> Message-ID: Perhaps the matter stems from the nationality of MFJ's owner and a different set of values. K0PP On Sun, Apr 7, 2019, 10:28 Wayne Burdick wrote: > I've used many MFJ products and in have had very little trouble with any > of them. For example, I make frequent use an MFJ-223 hand-held VNA -- it's > versatile and does the job. I've also used their manual tuners, antenna > switches, and portable/mobile whips. They have a very comprehensive product > line that's really unique in the industry. > > That said, I do have some suggestions for MFJ's engineering team on how > they might improve their ATU. > > Looking at the photo, I see that they used much smaller toroidal cores for > 5 of the 8 inductors in the L network. This could result in excessive > heating, especially on the higher bands, at full power into a worst-case > match. We specified T68 sized cores to remain conservative based on > extensive testing. Also, if you click on the photo to see the details, > you'll see what appears to be very inconsistent hand soldering of the SMD > components. While this doesn't necessarily worsen performance or > reliability, it should be done in a way that inspires confidence in the > buyer. (Easy for me to say, of course. We have the luxury of mass-producing > these assemblies using automated pick-and-place equipment at our fabricator > in Monterey.) > > Wayne > N6KR > > > > > On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Doug Person wrote: > > > > MFJ has been a leader in automatic tuner technology for years. It was > probably a very simple engineering process for them to use what they have > to create a K3 tuner. You may have a dislike of MFJ products. But, that > doesn't preclude the fact that their tuners work very well. They have been > selling the K3 tuner for years. It doesn't seem the least bit surprising > given the modular nature of the K3 and the long history MFJ has with > automatic tuner technology. Maybe it's actually a complement to Elecraft > that MFJ takes the K3 so seriously. > > > > Doug --KJ?F > > > > On 4/7/2019 10:26 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote: > >> Ozarkcon yesterday. Break-time. Pile of MFJ catalogs on a table. Took > one back to my seat to kill time. Opened it up to the second page and in > the lower left corner is a box-ad with the following: > >> > >> > >> "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig. MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of > the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 transceiver. > MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft K3 10 Watt or 100 > Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz. This automatic antenna tuner PC board > features an L-Match design and can match SWR up to 10:1. It handles 100 > Watts. The ATU PC board has a second antenna port, and a sub-rx SMA port. > All antenna ports are protected with gas discharge tubes. Super sensitive > relay allows excellent low current drain. MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 > 1/4D inches and easily slides right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs > less than 1/2 pound. Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and > save $$$!" > >> > >> > >> What in the world is that all about? What possible market are they > shooting at? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? > >> > >> Someone enlighten me! Did I sleep through April 1st? > >> > >> https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 > >> > >> 73, > >> > >> Kent K9ZTV > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From john at kk9a.com Sun Apr 7 12:43:19 2019 From: john at kk9a.com (john at kk9a.com) Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 11:43:19 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ Message-ID: <20190407114319.Horde.d3_tGA_9QN-6sgoVH-yNMxQ@www11.qth.com> The K3 has been out of production for four years, why is the top of the line Elecraft transceiver still commonly refereed to as a K3 and not a K3S? John KK9A - PJ4R in last weekend's WPX where I used my K3S. Kent K9ZTV wrote: "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig. MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 transceiver. MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft K3 10 Watt or 100 Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz. This automatic antenna tuner PC board features an L-Match design and can match SWR up to 10:1. It handles 100 Watts. The ATU PC board has a second antenna port, and a sub-rx SMA port. All antenna ports are protected with gas discharge tubes. Super sensitive relay allows excellent low current drain. MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 1/4D inches and easily slides right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs less than 1/2 pound. Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and save $$$!" What in the world is that all about? What possible market are they shooting at? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 73, Kent K9ZTV From josh at voodoolab.com Sun Apr 7 12:47:41 2019 From: josh at voodoolab.com (Josh Fiden) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 09:47:41 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> Message-ID: Are you kidding? His *nationality* is American. Unless I misunderstand, your stereotype comment is utterly offensive. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_F._Jue ...de W6XU Sent from my mobile device > On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:35 AM, Ken G Kopp wrote: > > Perhaps the matter stems from the nationality of MFJ's owner and a > different set of values. > > K0PP From kd5byb at gmail.com Sun Apr 7 12:56:13 2019 From: kd5byb at gmail.com (Ben Hall) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 11:56:13 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> Message-ID: On 4/7/2019 11:47 AM, Josh Fiden wrote: > Are you kidding? His *nationality* is American. Indeed, he is 100% American. Watch the YouTube video where he gives a tour of the factory if you have any doubt! He talks about his ancestors coming over to work on the railroads...and has a wonderful Southern accent. thanks much and 73, ben, kd5byb From eric.csuf at gmail.com Sun Apr 7 12:56:20 2019 From: eric.csuf at gmail.com (EricJ) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 09:56:20 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] LP-PAN 2 Panadapter with Z10000 for K2 In-Reply-To: <7F7517A3-A631-47D3-A37E-5B9BD3345B7B@yahoo.com> References: <9d27ee7b-089f-78a2-e4a0-81af257f7fba@gmail.com> <7F7517A3-A631-47D3-A37E-5B9BD3345B7B@yahoo.com> Message-ID: <924c991c-a20b-a3ff-06c4-0795d63bcfe1@gmail.com> Hi Paul, I'm sorry. I haven't received any emails except this one. The LP-PAN is available. I'll hold it for you until you can make a decision. Please let me know what you posted in the other emails so I can answer any questions. Use this gmail address until I can figure out what happened with eric_csuf at hotmail.com Eric KE6US On 4/7/2019 9:35 AM, Paul Gacek wrote: > Eric > > I am interested and have emailed you a couple of times off list as you > suggested. > > If the items are sold please let me know. > > Paul > W6PNG/M0SNA > www.nomadic.blog > > >> On Apr 6, 2019, at 3:40 PM, EricJ > > wrote: >> >> Originally an LP-PAN, but upgraded to LP-PAN 2. >> No extraneous holes or mods. >> >> Includes: >> LP-PAN 2 >> Z10000 buffer amp optimized for K2 >> BNC-SMA cable to connect K2 to LP-PAN >> Manual pdf's on DVD >> >> Photos here: >> https://photos.app.goo.gl/zRkmEw7V8ztjrALM8 >> >> See telepostinc.com for easy installation, current software and sound >> card recommendations. >> >> $150 including priority mail shipping to US only. >> >> Paypal preferred to email below. Ships immediately after payment is >> received. >> >> Contact me off-list. Semi-active on this list for years. Current info >> at QRZ.com. >> >> Eric KE6US >> eric_csuf at hotmail.com >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From n6kr at elecraft.com Sun Apr 7 12:57:01 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 09:57:01 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> Message-ID: <0317D4F9-3069-4C59-AC86-F860E1DD4CA7@elecraft.com> I've met Martin on several occasions. He's a gentleman and an entrepreneur with a long track record of serving the ham community. Can we just leave it at that? Thanks, Wayne N6KR From gobrien99 at charter.net Sun Apr 7 13:17:05 2019 From: gobrien99 at charter.net (George) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 13:17:05 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> Message-ID: Hi everyone, I had to jump in. I?ve known Martin for over 40 years and he is a fine Southern gentleman who received his M.S.E.E. from Mississippi State University. I too have an Asian heritage as my mother was Japanese. I bet you can?t guess what roots my father had. We love our USA! George O?Brien AB4FH BS Physics Clemson Univ. MS Physics Univ. Ala. In B?ham Captain in US Air Force during Vietnam Era First licensed as WN4PDQ in 1969 From: Ben Hall Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 12:56 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ On 4/7/2019 11:47 AM, Josh Fiden wrote: > Are you kidding? His *nationality* is American. Indeed, he is 100% American. Watch the YouTube video where he gives a tour of the factory if you have any doubt! He talks about his ancestors coming over to work on the railroads...and has a wonderful Southern accent. thanks much and 73, ben, kd5byb ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From buddy at brannan.name Sun Apr 7 13:20:36 2019 From: buddy at brannan.name (Buddy Brannan) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 13:20:36 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <20190407171714.0932F149B1A0@mailman.qth.net> References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> <20190407171714.0932F149B1A0@mailman.qth.net> Message-ID: <84F656E1-5644-4736-9FCF-FB742BB3DA47@brannan.name> I met Mr. MFJ, K5FLU, once as well, at the 100th ARRL anniversary do. Wait?Think it was there, although it could have as easily been another time, like Hamcomm a bazillion years ago. Anyway, as others have said, a gentleman in very sense. Soft spoken, well spoken, as ?American as you or I. Oh wait. ? I?m also half Asian, on my mother?s side, so?umm... Buddy Brannan, KB5ELV - Erie, PA Email: buddy at brannan.name Mobile: (814) 431-0962 > On Apr 7, 2019, at 1:17 PM, George wrote: > > Hi everyone, > I had to jump in. I?ve known Martin for over 40 years and he is a fine Southern gentleman who received his M.S.E.E. from Mississippi State University. I too have an Asian heritage as my mother was Japanese. I bet you can?t guess what roots my father had. We love our USA! > > George O?Brien > AB4FH > BS Physics Clemson Univ. > MS Physics Univ. Ala. In B?ham > Captain in US Air Force during Vietnam Era > First licensed as WN4PDQ in 1969 > > > From: Ben Hall > Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 12:56 PM > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ > > On 4/7/2019 11:47 AM, Josh Fiden wrote: >> Are you kidding? His *nationality* is American. > > Indeed, he is 100% American. Watch the YouTube video where he gives a > tour of the factory if you have any doubt! He talks about his ancestors > coming over to work on the railroads...and has a wonderful Southern accent. > > thanks much and 73, > ben, kd5byb > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From n1al at sonic.net Sun Apr 7 13:22:05 2019 From: n1al at sonic.net (Alan Bloom) Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 10:22:05 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> Message-ID: I've long had mixed feelings about MFJ. They have some very interesting, innovative, and cost-competitive products. However sometimes the quality isn't there. For example I have an MFJ antenna analyzer that was intermittent until I fixed a poor ground connection. I forget the details, but as I recall the problem was partly one of design. Alan N1AL On 2019-04-07 09:28, Wayne Burdick wrote: > I've used many MFJ products and in have had very little trouble with any of them. For example, I make frequent use an MFJ-223 hand-held VNA -- it's versatile and does the job. I've also used their manual tuners, antenna switches, and portable/mobile whips. They have a very comprehensive product line that's really unique in the industry. > > That said, I do have some suggestions for MFJ's engineering team on how they might improve their ATU. > > Looking at the photo, I see that they used much smaller toroidal cores for 5 of the 8 inductors in the L network. This could result in excessive heating, especially on the higher bands, at full power into a worst-case match. We specified T68 sized cores to remain conservative based on extensive testing. Also, if you click on the photo to see the details, you'll see what appears to be very inconsistent hand soldering of the SMD components. While this doesn't necessarily worsen performance or reliability, it should be done in a way that inspires confidence in the buyer. (Easy for me to say, of course. We have the luxury of mass-producing these assemblies using automated pick-and-place equipment at our fabricator in Monterey.) > > Wayne > N6KR From k9ztv at socket.net Sun Apr 7 13:22:17 2019 From: k9ztv at socket.net (K9ZTV) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 12:22:17 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <20190407114319.Horde.d3_tGA_9QN-6sgoVH-yNMxQ@www11.qth.com> References: <20190407114319.Horde.d3_tGA_9QN-6sgoVH-yNMxQ@www11.qth.com> Message-ID: <127DDCD6-8031-4918-A57B-748B078FF518@socket.net> Maybe because the discussion referenced what the clone referenced? K9ZTV > On Apr 7, 2019, at 11:43 AM, john at kk9a.com wrote: > > The K3 has been out of production for four years, why is the top of the line Elecraft transceiver still commonly refereed to as a K3 and not a K3S? > > John KK9A - PJ4R in last weekend's WPX where I used my K3S. > > > Kent K9ZTV wrote: > > > "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig. MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of > the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 transceiver. > MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft K3 10 Watt or > 100 Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz. This automatic antenna tuner PC > board features an L-Match design and can match SWR up to 10:1. It > handles 100 Watts. The ATU PC board has a second antenna port, and a > sub-rx SMA port. All antenna ports are protected with gas discharge > tubes. Super sensitive relay allows excellent low current drain. > MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 1/4D inches and easily slides right into > the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs less than 1/2 pound. Pick up this > great accessory for your K3 today and save $$$!" > > > What in the world is that all about? What possible market are they > shooting at? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? > > > https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 > > 73, > > Kent K9ZTV > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From macymonkeys at charter.net Sun Apr 7 13:30:51 2019 From: macymonkeys at charter.net (Macy monkeys) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 10:30:51 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> Message-ID: <23E3BC23-9BFB-4796-A9F4-0D4EEB2DFAF0@charter.net> Ouch. John K7FD > On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:35 AM, Ken G Kopp wrote: > > Perhaps the matter stems from the nationality of MFJ's owner and a > different set of values. > > K0PP > >> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019, 10:28 Wayne Burdick wrote: >> >> I've used many MFJ products and in have had very little trouble with any >> of them. For example, I make frequent use an MFJ-223 hand-held VNA -- it's >> versatile and does the job. I've also used their manual tuners, antenna >> switches, and portable/mobile whips. They have a very comprehensive product >> line that's really unique in the industry. >> >> That said, I do have some suggestions for MFJ's engineering team on how >> they might improve their ATU. >> >> Looking at the photo, I see that they used much smaller toroidal cores for >> 5 of the 8 inductors in the L network. This could result in excessive >> heating, especially on the higher bands, at full power into a worst-case >> match. We specified T68 sized cores to remain conservative based on >> extensive testing. Also, if you click on the photo to see the details, >> you'll see what appears to be very inconsistent hand soldering of the SMD >> components. While this doesn't necessarily worsen performance or >> reliability, it should be done in a way that inspires confidence in the >> buyer. (Easy for me to say, of course. We have the luxury of mass-producing >> these assemblies using automated pick-and-place equipment at our fabricator >> in Monterey.) >> >> Wayne >> N6KR >> >> >> >>> On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Doug Person wrote: >>> >>> MFJ has been a leader in automatic tuner technology for years. It was >> probably a very simple engineering process for them to use what they have >> to create a K3 tuner. You may have a dislike of MFJ products. But, that >> doesn't preclude the fact that their tuners work very well. They have been >> selling the K3 tuner for years. It doesn't seem the least bit surprising >> given the modular nature of the K3 and the long history MFJ has with >> automatic tuner technology. Maybe it's actually a complement to Elecraft >> that MFJ takes the K3 so seriously. >>> >>> Doug --KJ?F >>> >>>> On 4/7/2019 10:26 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote: >>>> Ozarkcon yesterday. Break-time. Pile of MFJ catalogs on a table. Took >> one back to my seat to kill time. Opened it up to the second page and in >> the lower left corner is a box-ad with the following: >>>> >>>> >>>> "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig. MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of >> the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 transceiver. >> MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft K3 10 Watt or 100 >> Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz. This automatic antenna tuner PC board >> features an L-Match design and can match SWR up to 10:1. It handles 100 >> Watts. The ATU PC board has a second antenna port, and a sub-rx SMA port. >> All antenna ports are protected with gas discharge tubes. Super sensitive >> relay allows excellent low current drain. MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 >> 1/4D inches and easily slides right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs >> less than 1/2 pound. Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and >> save $$$!" >>>> >>>> >>>> What in the world is that all about? What possible market are they >> shooting at? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? >>>> >>>> Someone enlighten me! Did I sleep through April 1st? >>>> >>>> https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 >>>> >>>> 73, >>>> >>>> Kent K9ZTV >> >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From donovanf at starpower.net Sun Apr 7 13:37:45 2019 From: donovanf at starpower.net (donovanf at starpower.net) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 13:37:45 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <23E3BC23-9BFB-4796-A9F4-0D4EEB2DFAF0@charter.net> Message-ID: <1962439468.22727815.1554658665186.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> Hi Wayne, This repulsive thread need to be terminated immediately. I?ve never seen anything like it before on here. 73 Frank W3LPL ----- Original Message ----- From: Macy monkeys <macymonkeys at charter.net> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Sent: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 13:30:51 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ Ouch. John K7FD > On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:35 AM, Ken G Kopp <kengkopp at gmail.com> wrote: > > Perhaps the matter stems from the nationality of MFJ's owner and a > different set of values. > > K0PP > >> On Sun, Apr 7, 2019, 10:28 Wayne Burdick <n6kr at elecraft.com> wrote: >> >> I've used many MFJ products and in have had very little trouble with any >> of them. For example, I make frequent use an MFJ-223 hand-held VNA -- it's >> versatile and does the job. I've also used their manual tuners, antenna >> switches, and portable/mobile whips. They have a very comprehensive product >> line that's really unique in the industry. >> >> That said, I do have some suggestions for MFJ's engineering team on how >> they might improve their ATU. >> >> Looking at the photo, I see that they used much smaller toroidal cores for >> 5 of the 8 inductors in the L network. This could result in excessive >> heating, especially on the higher bands, at full power into a worst-case >> match. We specified T68 sized cores to remain conservative based on >> extensive testing. Also, if you click on the photo to see the details, >> you'll see what appears to be very inconsistent hand soldering of the SMD >> components. While this doesn't necessarily worsen performance or >> reliability, it should be done in a way that inspires confidence in the >> buyer. (Easy for me to say, of course. We have the luxury of mass-producing >> these assemblies using automated pick-and-place equipment at our fabricator >> in Monterey.) >> >> Wayne >> N6KR >> >> >> >>> On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Doug Person <doug at kj0f.com> wrote: >>> >>> MFJ has been a leader in automatic tuner technology for years. It was >> probably a very simple engineering process for them to use what they have >> to create a K3 tuner. You may have a dislike of MFJ products. But, that >> doesn't preclude the fact that their tuners work very well. They have been >> selling the K3 tuner for years. It doesn't seem the least bit surprising >> given the modular nature of the K3 and the long history MFJ has with >> automatic tuner technology. Maybe it's actually a complement to Elecraft >> that MFJ takes the K3 so seriously. >>> >>> Doug --KJ?F >>> >>>> On 4/7/2019 10:26 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote: >>>> Ozarkcon yesterday. Break-time. Pile of MFJ catalogs on a table. Took >> one back to my seat to kill time. Opened it up to the second page and in >> the lower left corner is a box-ad with the following: >>>> >>>> >>>> "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig. MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of >> the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 transceiver. >> MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft K3 10 Watt or 100 >> Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz. This automatic antenna tuner PC board >> features an L-Match design and can match SWR up to 10:1. It handles 100 >> Watts. The ATU PC board has a second antenna port, and a sub-rx SMA port. >> All antenna ports are protected with gas discharge tubes. Super sensitive >> relay allows excellent low current drain. MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 >> 1/4D inches and easily slides right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs >> less than 1/2 pound. Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and >> save $$$!" >>>> >>>> >>>> What in the world is that all about? What possible market are they >> shooting at? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? >>>> >>>> Someone enlighten me! Did I sleep through April 1st? >>>> >>>> https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 >>>> >>>> 73, >>>> >>>> Kent K9ZTV >> >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From n6kr at elecraft.com Sun Apr 7 13:48:38 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 10:48:38 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <1962439468.22727815.1554658665186.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> References: <1962439468.22727815.1554658665186.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> Message-ID: <5D883133-9273-4A1C-BDB3-B56FA28968D0@elecraft.com> Agreed! Wayne N6KR > On Apr 7, 2019, at 10:37 AM, donovanf at starpower.net wrote: > > Hi Wayne, > > This repulsive thread need to be terminated immediately. I?ve never seen anything like it before on here. > > 73 > Frank > W3LPL From a.durbin at msn.com Sun Apr 7 14:11:28 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 18:11:28 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Clicks & Pops In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: This will only be of interest to a few KPA500 owners - those who don't think loud clicks/ticks/pops are acceptable. In the message below I reported that I had lost interest in my investigation because the click/ticks had stopped. That message is dated October 2018. Late March the ticks came back and now, early April, they are back to the annoying level that I experienced in 2018. What's different? Room temperature and consequently the powered on but not transmitting temperature of the KPA500 is much lower in the winter months. Although I lost interest in the investigation I continued to record PA temperature, heat sink temperature, and Z bracket temperature for every transmission I made. That's a lot of data but differences between summer and winter operating conditions may be interesting. I plan to pick a few mid winter samples to compare with a few peak summer samples. Has anyone else who is annoyed by KPA500 click/ticks noticed any correlation with room temperature? 73, Andy, k3wyc ________________________________ From: ANDY DURBIN Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 6:52 AM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: KPA500 Clicks & Pops I found this quite annoying too. My approach was to try to understand how the Z bracket temperature varied relative to the heat sink temperature. I placed a thermistor on the front end of the Z bracket and another on the heat sink fin closest to the Z bracket. I logged the standard PA temperature and these additional thermistor temperatures for every transmission I made (still do). I established baseline temperature characteristics and planned to use this data to see if any mods I made changed the characteristics. Surprise! - When I though I had enough data to move on to the next step in the investigation it stopped clicking. Adding the thermistors only required removal of the front panel and the Z bracket screws were no touched. It continued to click after the thermistors were added and then stopped a few weeks later. The data show the rapid change in temperature is at the PA sensor only. The heat sink and Z bracket change much more slowly and never have a large temperature difference. Their temperatures do cross over though. One problem with temperature logging is that I had no data, except for my test notes , on the clicks themselves. I had planned to added some inexpensive sound detection modules and add this data to the logger. That's on hold until the clicks come back. It's really nice not to have the amp click continuously on every FT8 transmission. I wish I knew what fixed it. 73, Andy k3wyc From w2xj at w2xj.net Sun Apr 7 14:21:57 2019 From: w2xj at w2xj.net (W2xj) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 11:21:57 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> Message-ID: Mighty fine junk Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 7, 2019, at 10:22, Alan Bloom wrote: > > I've long had mixed feelings about MFJ. They have some very > interesting, innovative, and cost-competitive products. However > sometimes the quality isn't there. For example I have an MFJ antenna > analyzer that was intermittent until I fixed a poor ground connection. > I forget the details, but as I recall the problem was partly one of > design. > > Alan N1AL > >> On 2019-04-07 09:28, Wayne Burdick wrote: >> >> I've used many MFJ products and in have had very little trouble with any of them. For example, I make frequent use an MFJ-223 hand-held VNA -- it's versatile and does the job. I've also used their manual tuners, antenna switches, and portable/mobile whips. They have a very comprehensive product line that's really unique in the industry. >> >> That said, I do have some suggestions for MFJ's engineering team on how they might improve their ATU. >> >> Looking at the photo, I see that they used much smaller toroidal cores for 5 of the 8 inductors in the L network. This could result in excessive heating, especially on the higher bands, at full power into a worst-case match. We specified T68 sized cores to remain conservative based on extensive testing. Also, if you click on the photo to see the details, you'll see what appears to be very inconsistent hand soldering of the SMD components. While this doesn't necessarily worsen performance or reliability, it should be done in a way that inspires confidence in the buyer. (Easy for me to say, of course. We have the luxury of mass-producing these assemblies using automated pick-and-place equipment at our fabricator in Monterey.) >> >> Wayne >> N6KR > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From hbjr at optilink.us Sun Apr 7 14:23:07 2019 From: hbjr at optilink.us (hbjr at optilink.us) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 14:23:07 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> Message-ID: <009601d4ed6e$f2b85860$d8290920$@optilink.us> Somebody pls close this thread! -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of W2xj Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 2:22 PM To: Alan Bloom Cc: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ Mighty fine junk Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 7, 2019, at 10:22, Alan Bloom wrote: > > I've long had mixed feelings about MFJ. They have some very > interesting, innovative, and cost-competitive products. However > sometimes the quality isn't there. For example I have an MFJ antenna > analyzer that was intermittent until I fixed a poor ground connection. > I forget the details, but as I recall the problem was partly one of > design. > > Alan N1AL > >> On 2019-04-07 09:28, Wayne Burdick wrote: >> >> I've used many MFJ products and in have had very little trouble with any of them. For example, I make frequent use an MFJ-223 hand-held VNA -- it's versatile and does the job. I've also used their manual tuners, antenna switches, and portable/mobile whips. They have a very comprehensive product line that's really unique in the industry. >> >> That said, I do have some suggestions for MFJ's engineering team on how they might improve their ATU. >> >> Looking at the photo, I see that they used much smaller toroidal >> cores for 5 of the 8 inductors in the L network. This could result in >> excessive heating, especially on the higher bands, at full power into >> a worst-case match. We specified T68 sized cores to remain >> conservative based on extensive testing. Also, if you click on the >> photo to see the details, you'll see what appears to be very >> inconsistent hand soldering of the SMD components. While this doesn't >> necessarily worsen performance or reliability, it should be done in a >> way that inspires confidence in the buyer. (Easy for me to say, of >> course. We have the luxury of mass-producing these assemblies using >> automated pick-and-place equipment at our fabricator in Monterey.) >> >> Wayne >> N6KR > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From c-hawley at illinois.edu Sun Apr 7 14:32:13 2019 From: c-hawley at illinois.edu (hawley, charles j jr) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 18:32:13 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com>, <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> Message-ID: I take it this is a KAT3 clone, not a KAT3A improved version. Chuck Hawley c-hawley at illinois.edu Amateur Radio, KE9UW aka Jack, BMW Motorcycles ________________________________ From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of Wayne Burdick Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 11:28 AM To: Doug Person Cc: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ I've used many MFJ products and in have had very little trouble with any of them. For example, I make frequent use an MFJ-223 hand-held VNA -- it's versatile and does the job. I've also used their manual tuners, antenna switches, and portable/mobile whips. They have a very comprehensive product line that's really unique in the industry. That said, I do have some suggestions for MFJ's engineering team on how they might improve their ATU. Looking at the photo, I see that they used much smaller toroidal cores for 5 of the 8 inductors in the L network. This could result in excessive heating, especially on the higher bands, at full power into a worst-case match. We specified T68 sized cores to remain conservative based on extensive testing. Also, if you click on the photo to see the details, you'll see what appears to be very inconsistent hand soldering of the SMD components. While this doesn't necessarily worsen performance or reliability, it should be done in a way that inspires confidence in the buyer. (Easy for me to say, of course. We have the luxury of mass-producing these assemblies using automated pick-and-place equipment at our fabricator in Monterey.) Wayne N6KR > On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Doug Person wrote: > > MFJ has been a leader in automatic tuner technology for years. It was probably a very simple engineering process for them to use what they have to create a K3 tuner. You may have a dislike of MFJ products. But, that doesn't preclude the fact that their tuners work very well. They have been selling the K3 tuner for years. It doesn't seem the least bit surprising given the modular nature of the K3 and the long history MFJ has with automatic tuner technology. Maybe it's actually a complement to Elecraft that MFJ takes the K3 so seriously. > > Doug --KJ?F > > On 4/7/2019 10:26 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote: >> Ozarkcon yesterday. Break-time. Pile of MFJ catalogs on a table. Took one back to my seat to kill time. Opened it up to the second page and in the lower left corner is a box-ad with the following: >> >> >> "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig. MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 transceiver. MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft K3 10 Watt or 100 Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz. This automatic antenna tuner PC board features an L-Match design and can match SWR up to 10:1. It handles 100 Watts. The ATU PC board has a second antenna port, and a sub-rx SMA port. All antenna ports are protected with gas discharge tubes. Super sensitive relay allows excellent low current drain. MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 1/4D inches and easily slides right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs less than 1/2 pound. Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and save $$$!" >> >> >> What in the world is that all about? What possible market are they shooting at? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? >> >> Someone enlighten me! Did I sleep through April 1st? >> >> https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 >> >> 73, >> >> Kent K9ZTV ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From n6kr at elecraft.com Sun Apr 7 14:34:02 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 11:34:02 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> Message-ID: Correct. Wayne > On Apr 7, 2019, at 11:32 AM, hawley, charles j jr wrote: > > I take it this is a KAT3 clone, not a KAT3A improved version. > > Chuck Hawley > c-hawley at illinois.edu > > Amateur Radio, KE9UW > aka Jack, BMW Motorcycles > > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of Wayne Burdick > Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 11:28 AM > To: Doug Person > Cc: Elecraft Reflector > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ > > I've used many MFJ products and in have had very little trouble with any of them. For example, I make frequent use an MFJ-223 hand-held VNA -- it's versatile and does the job. I've also used their manual tuners, antenna switches, and portable/mobile whips. They have a very comprehensive product line that's really unique in the industry. > > That said, I do have some suggestions for MFJ's engineering team on how they might improve their ATU. > > Looking at the photo, I see that they used much smaller toroidal cores for 5 of the 8 inductors in the L network. This could result in excessive heating, especially on the higher bands, at full power into a worst-case match. We specified T68 sized cores to remain conservative based on extensive testing. Also, if you click on the photo to see the details, you'll see what appears to be very inconsistent hand soldering of the SMD components. While this doesn't necessarily worsen performance or reliability, it should be done in a way that inspires confidence in the buyer. (Easy for me to say, of course. We have the luxury of mass-producing these assemblies using automated pick-and-place equipment at our fabricator in Monterey.) > > Wayne > N6KR > > > > > On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:00 AM, Doug Person wrote: > > > > MFJ has been a leader in automatic tuner technology for years. It was probably a very simple engineering process for them to use what they have to create a K3 tuner. You may have a dislike of MFJ products. But, that doesn't preclude the fact that their tuners work very well. They have been selling the K3 tuner for years. It doesn't seem the least bit surprising given the modular nature of the K3 and the long history MFJ has with automatic tuner technology. Maybe it's actually a complement to Elecraft that MFJ takes the K3 so seriously. > > > > Doug --KJ?F > > > > On 4/7/2019 10:26 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote: > >> Ozarkcon yesterday. Break-time. Pile of MFJ catalogs on a table. Took one back to my seat to kill time. Opened it up to the second page and in the lower left corner is a box-ad with the following: > >> > >> > >> "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig. MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 transceiver. MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft K3 10 Watt or 100 Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz. This automatic antenna tuner PC board features an L-Match design and can match SWR up to 10:1. It handles 100 Watts. The ATU PC board has a second antenna port, and a sub-rx SMA port. All antenna ports are protected with gas discharge tubes. Super sensitive relay allows excellent low current drain. MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 1/4D inches and easily slides right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs less than 1/2 pound. Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and save $$$!" > >> > >> > >> What in the world is that all about? What possible market are they shooting at? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? > >> > >> Someone enlighten me! Did I sleep through April 1st? > >> > >> https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 > >> > >> 73, > >> > >> Kent K9ZTV > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From frantz at pwpconsult.com Sun Apr 7 14:42:16 2019 From: frantz at pwpconsult.com (Bill Frantz) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 11:42:16 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> Message-ID: I had to re-solder the ground connection on the SO-239 connector on my MFJ antenna analyser. That's the only problem I've had with it. Getting a good connection on large chunks of metal is difficult, and takes a lot of heat. I've always considered that the MFJ products meet their specifications, while the Elecraft ones exceed them. (I won't mention the time I ran 100W through a T1 tuner. It wasn't for long and the tuner survived.) 73 Bill AE6JV On 4/7/19 at 9:28 AM, n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) wrote: >Also, if you click on the photo to see the details, you'll see >what appears to be very inconsistent hand soldering of the SMD components. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | If the site is supported by | Periwinkle (408)356-8506 | ads, you are the product. | 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com | | Los Gatos, CA 95032 From eric at elecraft.com Sun Apr 7 14:47:08 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 11:47:08 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> Message-ID: <71A716EC-E61A-4E29-8978-F1AF7C292786@elecraft.com> Folks, we exceeding the single topic limit number of posts and its also a long delayed repeat of a prior thread from over a year or two ago. Let's close it in the interest of relieving email overload for our other readers. Feel free to search the nabble archive of the list for prior posts on this topic. Its also outside of the list guidelines to criticize other manufacturer's products here. 73, Eric Moderator, from time to time elecraft.com _..._ > On Apr 7, 2019, at 10:22 AM, Alan Bloom wrote: > > I've long had mixed feelings about MFJ. They have some very > interesting, innovative, and cost-competitive products. However > sometimes the quality isn't there. For example I have an MFJ antenna > analyzer that was intermittent until I fixed a poor ground connection. > I forget the details, but as I recall the problem was partly one of > design. > > Alan N1AL > >> On 2019-04-07 09:28, Wayne Burdick wrote: >> >> I've used many MFJ products and in have had very little trouble with any of them. For example, I make frequent use an MFJ-223 hand-held VNA -- it's versatile and does the job. I've also used their manual tuners, antenna switches, and portable/mobile whips. They have a very comprehensive product line that's really unique in the industry. >> >> That said, I do have some suggestions for MFJ's engineering team on how they might improve their ATU. >> >> Looking at the photo, I see that they used much smaller toroidal cores for 5 of the 8 inductors in the L network. This could result in excessive heating, especially on the higher bands, at full power into a worst-case match. We specified T68 sized cores to remain conservative based on extensive testing. Also, if you click on the photo to see the details, you'll see what appears to be very inconsistent hand soldering of the SMD components. While this doesn't necessarily worsen performance or reliability, it should be done in a way that inspires confidence in the buyer. (Easy for me to say, of course. We have the luxury of mass-producing these assemblies using automated pick-and-place equipment at our fabricator in Monterey.) >> >> Wayne >> N6KR > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From n6kr at elecraft.com Sun Apr 7 14:47:51 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 11:47:51 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5BF00FE1-4DF4-4872-8F06-E9671B18F2FC@elecraft.com> Bill Frantz wrote: > (I won't mention... too late! > the time I ran 100W through a T1 tuner. It wasn't for long and the tuner survived.) Ouch. We did T1 tests at 50 W to make sure it could handle 20 W, and even that was an invitation-only event, with observers at a distance wearing safety goggles. How long it would survive a KPA1500 is left as an exercise for the reader. I'm imagining a soft blue glow from the toroids. Wayne N6KR From elanzl at sbcglobal.net Sun Apr 7 15:56:01 2019 From: elanzl at sbcglobal.net (Eric Lanzl) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 19:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft SSB Net log for 4-7-2019 References: <590398479.18248141.1554666961773.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <590398479.18248141.1554666961773@mail.yahoo.com> Here is the log for today's SSB net. While there was considerable fading, we still had a good turnout for the net. Elecraft SSB Net 4-7-2019 WB9JNZ ?????? Eric?????IL???? ?? K3?????????? 4017???Net Control NC0JW????????? Jim????? CO??? ? KX3????? ? ? 1356???Relay station WM6P ????????? Steve ? GA??? ? K3S ????? ?11453?? Relay station KS6F???????????? Guy???? CA??? ? K3S??????? 10605 K6FW??????????? Frank?? CA????? K3S???? ?? 11672 W1NGA???????? AL??????? CO???? K3??????? ? ?? 5765 KI6UJH????????? Doug?? CO?????? KX3/100??10710 KC7ZJI????????? Steve ??CA???????KX3????????? 1525 W2RWA??????? Dick???? NY?????? K3??????????? 2603 W7QHD???????? Kurt ???? AZ?????? K2/100 ???? 1538 W7REK ??????? Glenn ? AZ?????? K3 ????? ????? 2843 W1DFB????????? Don???? AZ?????? K3??????? ???? 2937 AE6JV??????????? Bill?????? CA????? K3??????? ???6299 K6VWE????????? Stan???? MI?????? K3??????? ????? 650 K8NU? ?????????? Carl???? OH????? K3S???? ??? 10996 NS7P???????????? Phil????? OR????? K3??????? ???? 1826 K7JG???????????? John??? WA????? KX3???? ?? ?? 3519 K7SEN???????? ? Neil????? AZ????? K3??????? ?? ?? 6331??Relay station KL0RG???????? ? Kevin? ?? AL????? KX3???? ???????? KM6JUD???????? Keith???CA????? IC 7300 VE6BEX???????? Tom??? ? AB????? TS 530 W4TYB?????????? Peter? ? GA????? KX2???? ??????????Buddy stick vertical N7BDL??????????? Terry??? AZ?????? K3S???? ????10373 From dave at nk7z.net Sun Apr 7 16:14:57 2019 From: dave at nk7z.net (Dave Cole (NK7Z)) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 13:14:57 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <5BF00FE1-4DF4-4872-8F06-E9671B18F2FC@elecraft.com> References: <5BF00FE1-4DF4-4872-8F06-E9671B18F2FC@elecraft.com> Message-ID: Actually keeping this thread open is a better thing... It lets Elecraft users see what other options are available... That said-- I know I would never add an MFJ item to my K3. The fact Elecraft has allowed this thread to continue shows how open minded Elecraft is, and how sure of their product they are... 73s and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Technical Specialist ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL OOC for Oregon On 4/7/19 11:47 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote: > Bill Frantz wrote: > >> (I won't mention... > > too late! > >> the time I ran 100W through a T1 tuner. It wasn't for long and the tuner survived.) > > Ouch. We did T1 tests at 50 W to make sure it could handle 20 W, and even that was an invitation-only event, with observers at a distance wearing safety goggles. How long it would survive a KPA1500 is left as an exercise for the reader. I'm imagining a soft blue glow from the toroids. > > Wayne > N6KR > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From rmcgraw at blomand.net Sun Apr 7 16:47:00 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 15:47:00 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 Clicks & Pops In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Come to think about it, I haven't heard mine click and pop in quite some time.? I doubt that it's seasonal, but that is an interesting twist.? I doubt that my room or the dormant equipment varies over +/- 2?F over any given 24 hr period. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/7/2019 1:11 PM, Andy Durbin wrote: > This will only be of interest to a few KPA500 owners - those who don't think loud clicks/ticks/pops are acceptable. > > In the message below I reported that I had lost interest in my investigation because the click/ticks had stopped. That message is dated October 2018. Late March the ticks came back and now, early April, they are back to the annoying level that I experienced in 2018. What's different? Room temperature and consequently the powered on but not transmitting temperature of the KPA500 is much lower in the winter months. > > Although I lost interest in the investigation I continued to record PA temperature, heat sink temperature, and Z bracket temperature for every transmission I made. That's a lot of data but differences between summer and winter operating conditions may be interesting. I plan to pick a few mid winter samples to compare with a few peak summer samples. > > Has anyone else who is annoyed by KPA500 click/ticks noticed any correlation with room temperature? > > 73, > Andy, k3wyc > > > ________________________________ > From: ANDY DURBIN > Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 6:52 AM > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: KPA500 Clicks & Pops > > > I found this quite annoying too. My approach was to try to understand how the Z bracket temperature varied relative to the heat sink temperature. I placed a thermistor on the front end of the Z bracket and another on the heat sink fin closest to the Z bracket. I logged the standard PA temperature and these additional thermistor temperatures for every transmission I made (still do). I established baseline temperature characteristics and planned to use this data to see if any mods I made changed the characteristics. > > > Surprise! - When I though I had enough data to move on to the next step in the investigation it stopped clicking. > > > Adding the thermistors only required removal of the front panel and the Z bracket screws were no touched. It continued to click after the thermistors were added and then stopped a few weeks later. > > > The data show the rapid change in temperature is at the PA sensor only. The heat sink and Z bracket change much more slowly and never have a large temperature difference. Their temperatures do cross over though. > > > One problem with temperature logging is that I had no data, except for my test notes , on the clicks themselves. I had planned to added some inexpensive sound detection modules and add this data to the logger. That's on hold until the clicks come back. > > > It's really nice not to have the amp click continuously on every FT8 transmission. I wish I knew what fixed it. > > > 73, > > Andy k3wyc > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From barrylazar2 at gmail.com Sun Apr 7 18:14:03 2019 From: barrylazar2 at gmail.com (Barry) Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2019 22:14:03 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <8CC1FD14-4103-4DD8-9F82-521D00CAA117@elecraft.com> References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <10ca01d4ed5d$191b54b0$4b51fe10$@wjschmidt.com> <8CC1FD14-4103-4DD8-9F82-521D00CAA117@elecraft.com> Message-ID: Wayne, Is that same algorithm and code in the KX3 and K3s?? 73, Barry K3NDM ------ Original Message ------ From: "Wayne Burdick" To: "Dr. William J. Schmidt" Cc: "Elecraft Reflector" Sent: 4/7/2019 12:32:03 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ >> On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:15 AM, Dr. William J. Schmidt wrote: >> >> There isn't really much in the way of smarts on the clone board. It's simply the tuner elements (coils and capacitors), a few relays, the relay driver chips, and gas tubes. The actual tuning smarts comes from elsewhere within the K3. This isn?t much of a stretch for a clone. >> > > >That's correct. The heart of any binary-weighted L-network ATU is in the firmware, which we've been improving since I first wrote the code for the KAT2. The latest incarnation of this code is in the KAT1500, the ATU included in the KPA1500 amp. My colleague K6KR has done a great job of tweaking the algorithm to eek out that last tenth of an SWR unit on every match. > >Wayne >N6KR > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Doug Person >> Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 11:00 AM >> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ >> >> MFJ has been a leader in automatic tuner technology for years. It was probably a very simple engineering process for them to use what they have to create a K3 tuner. You may have a dislike of MFJ products. But, that doesn't preclude the fact that their tuners work very well. They have been selling the K3 tuner for years. It doesn't seem the least bit surprising given the modular nature of the K3 and the long history MFJ has with automatic tuner technology. Maybe it's actually a complement to Elecraft that MFJ takes the K3 so seriously. >> >> Doug --KJ?F >> >> On 4/7/2019 10:26 AM, KENT TRIMBLE wrote: >>> Ozarkcon yesterday. Break-time. Pile of MFJ catalogs on a table. Took >>> one back to my seat to kill time. Opened it up to the second page and >>> in the lower left corner is a box-ad with the following: >>> >>> >>> "MFJ ATU PC Board for Elecraft K-3 Rig. MFJ-950K3 is a super clone of >>> the KAT3 optional tuning board for the superb Elecraft K3 transceiver. >>> MFJ-950K3 is a direct plug-in PC board for the Elecraft >>> K3 10 Watt or 100 Watt model. Covers 1.8 to 54 MHz. This automatic >>> antenna tuner PC board features an L-Match design and can match SWR up >>> to 10:1. It handles 100 Watts. The ATU PC board has a second antenna >>> port, and a sub-rx SMA port. All antenna ports are protected with gas >>> discharge tubes. Super sensitive relay allows excellent low current >>> drain. MFJ-950K3 is 4W x 3 1/2H x 1 1/4D inches and easily slides >>> right into the K3?s tuning board slot. Weighs less than 1/2 pound. >>> Pick up this great accessory for your K3 today and save $$$!" >>> >>> >>> What in the world is that all about? What possible market are they >>> shooting at? Who would put anything "MFJ" in anything Elecraft? >>> >>> Someone enlighten me! Did I sleep through April 1st? >>> >>> https://www.mfjenterprises.com/Product.php?productid=MFJ-950K3 >>> >>> 73, >>> >>> Kent K9ZTV > > > >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From eric.csuf at gmail.com Sun Apr 7 18:18:09 2019 From: eric.csuf at gmail.com (EricJ) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 15:18:09 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] T1 aznd LP-PAN Sold Message-ID: <936a69c1-0528-1a23-3f41-be5d8807773c@gmail.com> The T1 and LP-PAN have been sold. XG3 still available. Thanks to Elecraft reflector for making this possible. Eric KE6US From wglevy at gmail.com Sun Apr 7 18:46:00 2019 From: wglevy at gmail.com (Bill Levy) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 18:46:00 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] MFJ Message-ID: <20A53892-D21C-4333-BE2B-835B63E86DF6@gmail.com> I am 71. Hamming since early teen. Consider MFJ below par. You get what you pay for. Stay away from junk. Bill N2WL From ki4txp at gmail.com Sun Apr 7 19:03:25 2019 From: ki4txp at gmail.com (JAY) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 19:03:25 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 and Winmore Message-ID: Good afternoon one and all. I am trying to set up my K3 to use Winlink HF I am able to RX but unable to connect. I have tried all the possible settings with no luck. This OM is missing something. I have been able to TX WSPR and FT8 I know I am missing a setting of some thought. Any help would be deeply appreciated. In advance THANKS to all. -- 73 KI4TXP JAY From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sun Apr 7 19:42:07 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 19:42:07 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 and Winmore In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Jay, Set the audio level on transmit so you have 4 bars solid and the 5th bar flashing. There is a document on my website www.w3fpr.com that may help. Scroll the left column to the last entry and click to view the document. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/7/2019 7:03 PM, JAY wrote: > Good afternoon one and all. > I am trying to set up my K3 to use Winlink HF I am able to RX but unable > to connect. I have tried all the possible settings with no luck. > This OM is missing something. > I have been able to TX WSPR and FT8 > I know I am missing a setting of some thought. > Any help would be deeply appreciated. > In advance THANKS to all. From n6kr at elecraft.com Sun Apr 7 20:11:37 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 17:11:37 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <10ca01d4ed5d$191b54b0$4b51fe10$@wjschmidt.com> <8CC1FD14-4103-4DD8-9F82-521D00CAA117@elecraft.com> Message-ID: Hi Barry, The basic algorithm was developed for the KAT2, but it has morphed into several variations for our different tuners, including the T1, KAT1/2/3/3A/100/500/1500, and KXAT1/2/3/100. It's all about "pruning the search tree," to borrow a term from game theory. 73, Wayne N6KR > On Apr 7, 2019, at 3:14 PM, Barry wrote: > > Wayne, > Is that same algorithm and code in the KX3 and K3s?? > > 73, > Barry > K3NDM > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Wayne Burdick" > To: "Dr. William J. Schmidt" > Cc: "Elecraft Reflector" > Sent: 4/7/2019 12:32:03 PM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ > >>> On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:15 AM, Dr. William J. Schmidt wrote: >>> >>> There isn't really much in the way of smarts on the clone board. It's simply the tuner elements (coils and capacitors), a few relays, the relay driver chips, and gas tubes. The actual tuning smarts comes from elsewhere within the K3. This isn?t much of a stretch for a clone. >>> >> >> >> That's correct. The heart of any binary-weighted L-network ATU is in the firmware, which we've been improving since I first wrote the code for the KAT2. The latest incarnation of this code is in the KAT1500, the ATU included in the KPA1500 amp. My colleague K6KR has done a great job of tweaking the algorithm to eek out that last tenth of an SWR unit on every match. >> >> Wayne >> N6KR From kevinr at coho.net Sun Apr 7 20:16:54 2019 From: kevinr at coho.net (kevinr) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 17:16:54 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report Message-ID: <6dcca221-b89f-0cfc-7a77-e4c2dbb40504@coho.net> Good Evening, ??? I have not been skunked in many years.? But, on 40 meters I was met with dead air after each CQ. ? On 14049.5 kHz at 2200z: NO8V - John - MI? healing as his weather improves K6XK - Roy - IA?? living the good life with cheap parking AB9V - Mike - IN? enjoying fewer bugs and warmer weather K4TO - Dave - KY? antenna plans fill his dreams W0CZ - Ken - ND? still thawing out from a long winter ? On 7047.5 kHz at 0000z: After the conditions of the twenty meter net I had expected to be greeted by many signals on forty meters.? Oh well. Until next week stay well, ?? 73, ????? Kevin?? KD5ONS - From frantz at pwpconsult.com Sun Apr 7 21:10:16 2019 From: frantz at pwpconsult.com (Bill Frantz) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 18:10:16 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <5BF00FE1-4DF4-4872-8F06-E9671B18F2FC@elecraft.com> Message-ID: I remember the bright yellow glow from the final in my Heathkit DX-40 when I forgot to connect the antenna. At least the plate didn't melt and the tube still worked. I had a 100W K3 with no tuner and one of my antennas needed a tuner, probably for 30M. I used the T1, with the caveat that I would always lower the power when running through it. Well, I screwed up one time. I think what I noticed was that as my PSK31 macro ran, the SWR kept rising. I think I got the cores hot enough to change their magnetic properties. When they cooled off, everything went back to normal. But as I said, Elecraft equipment tends to survive forays well outside their specs. 73 Bill AE6JV On 4/7/19 at 11:47 AM, n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) wrote: >Bill Frantz wrote: > >>(I won't mention... > >too late! > >>the time I ran 100W through a T1 tuner. It wasn't for long and >>the tuner survived.) > >Ouch. We did T1 tests at 50 W to make sure it could handle 20 >W, and even that was an invitation-only event, with observers >at a distance wearing safety goggles. How long it would survive >a KPA1500 is left as an exercise for the reader. I'm imagining >a soft blue glow from the toroids. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | Security is like Government | Periwinkle (408)356-8506 | services. The market doesn't | 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com | want to pay for them. | Los Gatos, CA 95032 From a.durbin at msn.com Sun Apr 7 21:20:24 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 01:20:24 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Automatic tuner implementation Message-ID: "It's all about "pruning the search tree," to borrow a term from game theory." That always struck me as being a bit like trying to whack a pinata while blindfolded. Why is it not possible to measure the complex impedance and compute the solution? That should be a lot faster than any iterative method. Sure, it needs a better detector but isn't Elecraft about elegant solutions? I'll probably find the answer for myself in a while as it's on the list of things to try with my Kenwood/Elecraft interface (I have LP-100A complex load impedance available). Pointers to any failed or successful attempts to do this would be appreciated. 73, Andy, k3wyc From bill at wjschmidt.com Sun Apr 7 21:46:30 2019 From: bill at wjschmidt.com (Dr. William J. Schmidt) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 20:46:30 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Automatic tuner implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <11ef01d4edac$e3ec9ec0$abc5dc40$@wjschmidt.com> Wayne is correct here. If you don't use a principled approach to finding the the best tuning solution, there are excellent binary searches that have roots in game theory that are extremely good. The optimum is to marry them both. The most successful commercial (militairy) algroithms start with a phase-amplitude transfer function inversion to get very close to a solution followed by a binary search to the final solution. -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Andy Durbin Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 8:20 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Automatic tuner implementation "It's all about "pruning the search tree," to borrow a term from game theory." That always struck me as being a bit like trying to whack a pinata while blindfolded. Why is it not possible to measure the complex impedance and compute the solution? That should be a lot faster than any iterative method. Sure, it needs a better detector but isn't Elecraft about elegant solutions? I'll probably find the answer for myself in a while as it's on the list of things to try with my Kenwood/Elecraft interface (I have LP-100A complex load impedance available). Pointers to any failed or successful attempts to do this would be appreciated. 73, Andy, k3wyc ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From eric at elecraft.com Mon Apr 8 00:05:20 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 21:05:20 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> Message-ID: <4D2E6DE6-A8D3-4AF1-A533-825FC4EF8030@elecraft.com> Folks - I just been made aware of the posting below. I am very disappointed and distressed that this happened here. This extremely inappropriate and racist posting is in direct violation of the Elecraft list guidelines, and it is also in direct conflict with the Ethics we at Elecraft stand for. Posts of this type involving both racial and/or direct attacks on others, regardless of where they are born or live, will not be tolerated here. Period. As a side note, Martin, the owner of of MFJ, was born in and grew up in Mississippi. He earned his engineering degrees from Mississippi State University Bagley College of Engineering and also the Georgia Institute of Technology. I know Martin and he is an honorable hard working person with impeccable values who has our deepest respect. Ken, the list deserves a direct apology, as does Martin. Eric elecraft.com _..._ > On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:35 AM, Ken G Kopp wrote: > > Perhaps the matter stems from the nationality of MFJ's owner and a > different set of values. > > K0PP From gthornton at thorntonmostullaw.com Mon Apr 8 00:54:37 2019 From: gthornton at thorntonmostullaw.com (George Thornton) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 04:54:37 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <4D2E6DE6-A8D3-4AF1-A533-825FC4EF8030@elecraft.com> References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> <33aa53a2-d17a-eca8-06b9-ed56d710b5b5@kj0f.com> <7D7DEED3-EB64-4A8D-9A66-0B87DE30AC59@elecraft.com> <4D2E6DE6-A8D3-4AF1-A533-825FC4EF8030@elecraft.com> Message-ID: I concur wholeheartedly and thank you. -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft Sent: Sunday, April 7, 2019 9:05 PM To: Ken G Kopp Cc: Elecraft Subject: Re: [Elecraft] OT: BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ Folks - I just been made aware of the posting below. I am very disappointed and distressed that this happened here. This extremely inappropriate and racist posting is in direct violation of the Elecraft list guidelines, and it is also in direct conflict with the Ethics we at Elecraft stand for. Posts of this type involving both racial and/or direct attacks on others, regardless of where they are born or live, will not be tolerated here. Period. As a side note, Martin, the owner of of MFJ, was born in and grew up in Mississippi. He earned his engineering degrees from Mississippi State University Bagley College of Engineering and also the Georgia Institute of Technology. I know Martin and he is an honorable hard working person with impeccable values who has our deepest respect. Ken, the list deserves a direct apology, as does Martin. Eric elecraft.com _..._ > On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:35 AM, Ken G Kopp wrote: > > Perhaps the matter stems from the nationality of MFJ's owner and a > different set of values. > > K0PP ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From phystad at mac.com Mon Apr 8 00:58:14 2019 From: phystad at mac.com (Phil Hystad) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 21:58:14 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Technical question on keying of an SDR radio Message-ID: If you look at various old circuit diagrams of ancient radios made from electronic circuits you find that the telegraph keying for the radio involves switching on and off the driving oscillator frequency or something similar. However, with an SDR, you have other options and I have no idea how it is typically done. For example, a digital signal can be produced that represents the Morse coding and this signal need merely be converted to analog and amplified. Or, is there still an analog circuit being switched on and off for Morse code (telegraphy) keying with a modern SDR. Can someone describe how this is done in a radio like the KX2. And, is it done differently in the different Elecraft radios ? I presume that the K2 would have the more traditional sort of circuit but that is really just a wild guess on my part. 73, phil, K7PEH From n6kr at elecraft.com Mon Apr 8 01:24:50 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 22:24:50 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Technical question on keying of an SDR radio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9B387C03-9EBA-4031-895D-36BBF909CD83@elecraft.com> Hi Phil, In the K2 the sidetone starts off as a squarewave created by the microcontroller. This is then shaped and injected into the AF amplifier. The sidetone is turned on/off at the same time as the carrier, which is generated by the LO (PLL synth) mixing with a gated TX BFO signal. In our DSP-based radios (K3/K3S and KX2/KX3), both the audio sidetone and the 15 kHz 2nd IF carrier are created by the DSP. Their rising edges are shaped mathematically using what's called a "raised cosine" or sigmodal waveform. We experimented to find the ideal waveform equation, the result being the cleaned signal possible, with virtually no key clicks. The DSP can of course do other things like apply amplitude or frequency modulation, generate voice and data mode signals, apply ALC and audio EQ, etc. CW is just the simplest case of what can be done. From the DSP, the digitized audio signal codes to a DAC (part of the audio CODEC IC), which then converts it to analog for injection into the AF amp. The 15 kHz 2nd IF carrier in the K3/K3S goes to a transmit mixer on the KREF4 module where it's up-converted to about 8215 kHz. It is then routed to the first IF mixer. The 8215 kHz signal passes through two crystal filters enroute mixer. In the KX2/KX3, the 15 kHz IF signal is converted to a pair of IQ signals (90 degrees out of phase with each other) to directly modulate a quadrature up-converter. The other input to the up-converter is a pair of balanced LO signals, again separated by 90 degrees. A result of IQ modulation is that one sideband is cancelled out, resulting in a single RF carrier at the desired frequency. In all cases, the rest of the T/R sequencing involves the usual amplifiers, PIN diodes, filter switching, etc. 73, Wayne N6KR > On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:58 PM, Phil Hystad via Elecraft wrote: > > If you look at various old circuit diagrams of ancient radios made from electronic circuits you find that the telegraph keying for the radio involves switching on and off the driving oscillator frequency or something similar. > > However, with an SDR, you have other options and I have no idea how it is typically done. For example, a digital signal can be produced that represents the Morse coding and this signal need merely be converted to analog and amplified. Or, is there still an analog circuit being switched on and off for Morse code (telegraphy) keying with a modern SDR. > > Can someone describe how this is done in a radio like the KX2. And, is it done differently in the different Elecraft radios ? I presume that the K2 would have the more traditional sort of circuit but that is really just a wild guess on my part. > > 73, phil, K7PEH > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From n6kr at elecraft.com Mon Apr 8 01:25:26 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2019 22:25:26 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Technical question on keying of an SDR radio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: By the way, a similar explanation can be found in the Theory of Operation section of any of our transceiver manuals. Wayne N6KR > On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:58 PM, Phil Hystad via Elecraft wrote: > > If you look at various old circuit diagrams of ancient radios made from electronic circuits you find that the telegraph keying for the radio involves switching on and off the driving oscillator frequency or something similar. > > However, with an SDR, you have other options and I have no idea how it is typically done. For example, a digital signal can be produced that represents the Morse coding and this signal need merely be converted to analog and amplified. Or, is there still an analog circuit being switched on and off for Morse code (telegraphy) keying with a modern SDR. > > Can someone describe how this is done in a radio like the KX2. And, is it done differently in the different Elecraft radios ? I presume that the K2 would have the more traditional sort of circuit but that is really just a wild guess on my part. > > 73, phil, K7PEH From indians at xsmail.com Mon Apr 8 04:31:12 2019 From: indians at xsmail.com (Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 01:31:12 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] BIZARRE OFFERING FROM MFJ In-Reply-To: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> References: <8cfce6ce-1d3b-6605-70ff-38ae0238cae3@socket.net> Message-ID: <1554712272314-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Hi, it never occurred to me put anything non-E;ecraft to my fully loaded K3 radio. I smept damn much for my K3 so would it be stupid and risky to waste it by MFJ or even chinese crap. ----- 73 - Petr, OK1RP "Apple & Elecraft freak" B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com G+:http://goo.gl/w3u2s9 G+: http://goo.gl/gP99xq -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From djwilcox01 at yahoo.com Mon Apr 8 04:56:03 2019 From: djwilcox01 at yahoo.com (David Wilcox) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 04:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] MFJ In-Reply-To: <20A53892-D21C-4333-BE2B-835B63E86DF6@gmail.com> References: <20A53892-D21C-4333-BE2B-835B63E86DF6@gmail.com> Message-ID: <322D34FD-7F21-4C4D-89CF-9BF0E4B5AE0D@yahoo.com> I still have the first product MFJ ever put out, a CW audio filter that rang a little at the narrowest setting, but made my HW7 much easier to use. Yes, some MFJ products are put together with less skill than some of us more exacting hams and a few of the MFJ products I have did require a touch of the soldering iron or the tightening of a grounding bolt but their products do work and for the lower cost are effective. Look at any QRZ photo and you will see a MFJ product somewhere. I have most of the QRP Elecraft products and love them but Elecraft doesn?t offer all the products that MFJ does. MFJ has a good warranty and they have honored it with me when needed. Their problem solving team has responded to my emails and helped me when needed. Elecraft is the Mercedes or BMW of the hobby. MFJ is the Ford or Chevy. My hats off and thanks to both fine companies for making this hobby fun for the past 59 years for this old retired guy. Any ham that can?t or WON?T fix their MFJ (or other less expensive radio product) item isn?t a ham in the real spirit, but that is still OK. This IS A HOBBY and hobbies are supposed to help us relax and forget for a while the problems and issues of the day. More healthier than going to the bar after work too. Different strokes for different folks. Again I will say (with my wife?s agreement) ham radio is much cheaper than a psychiatrist and less trouble than a mistress. My XYL always knows where I am and knew about my weird hobby when we got married 45 years ago. Nuff Sed, Dave K8WPE David J. Wilcox K8WPE?s iPad > On Apr 7, 2019, at 6:46 PM, Bill Levy wrote: > > I am 71. > Hamming since early teen. > Consider MFJ below par. > You get what you pay for. > Stay away from junk. > Bill N2WL > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From kengkopp at gmail.com Mon Apr 8 08:15:42 2019 From: kengkopp at gmail.com (Ken G Kopp) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 06:15:42 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] My "MFJ Posting" Message-ID: I am dismayed at the view some took of my posting. I intended absolutely no racial or eletist content ... in any way ... and apologize to anyone who read it that way. 73 ! Ken Kopp - K0PP From kengkopp at gmail.com Mon Apr 8 09:29:39 2019 From: kengkopp at gmail.com (Ken G Kopp) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 07:29:39 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: An "education" for me ... Message-ID: Until this MFJ flap arose, I took the Mighty Fine Junk name as a form of humor. I did -not- even remotely realize that this is the owner's initials. Duhh! FWIW 73 ! Ken - K0PP From sue.walt at dososaur.com Mon Apr 8 10:00:12 2019 From: sue.walt at dososaur.com (Walter J. Legowski) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:00:12 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Automatic tuner implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: My XYL (Sue, N2LBR) was also interested to try this. She was watching closely as I was doing alpha testing for the KPA1500 firmware, and was wondering if using the network solution would provide guidance for an iteration scheme. Her solution works even if the complex load impedance is not available. Based on the measured SWR straight through, the minimum and maximum real parts (load resistance) can be calculated, along with the corresponding (plus and minus) imaginary parts (load reactance). This defines the "space" in which the solution exists. A binary search proceeds by first solving the "exact" solution for the given real part (and the corresponding plus and minus imaginary parts), and then using those tuner settings (for L and C) to get a SWR with the actual load (which is modeled in her solution). The algorithm proceeds by zeroing in on the iterated settings that have the lowest SWR. It usually converges in less than 5 iterations to get a SWR less than 1.1:1, even for very large values of (initial, unmatched) SWR. Walt, WA1KKM On 4/8/19 1:20 AM, Andy Durbin wrote: > "It's all about "pruning the search tree," to borrow a term from game theory." > > That always struck me as being a bit like trying to whack a pinata while blindfolded. Why is it not possible to measure the complex impedance and compute the solution? That should be a lot faster than any iterative method. Sure, it needs a better detector but isn't Elecraft about elegant solutions? > > I'll probably find the answer for myself in a while as it's on the list of things to try with my Kenwood/Elecraft interface (I have LP-100A complex load impedance available). > > Pointers to any failed or successful attempts to do this would be appreciated. > > 73, > Andy, k3wyc > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From softblue at windstream.net Mon Apr 8 10:18:27 2019 From: softblue at windstream.net (Dick Dickinson) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 10:18:27 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] MFJ, Elecraft, Cultures Message-ID: <000101d4ee15$efeb5bd0$cfc21370$@windstream.net> If different companies can be valued differently by individuals, why is it taboo to do so with cultures? It seems to me that the people that used to say, "I don't like labels," now slap a label on every person or thought that does not meet their notion of fashionable memes. .and to Ken. Humor most often has a victim. At the rate we are going, there won't be much to laugh about in the future. Dick - KA5KKT From jim.w4atk at gmail.com Mon Apr 8 10:43:04 2019 From: jim.w4atk at gmail.com (James Rogers) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 09:43:04 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] MFJ, Elecraft, Cultures In-Reply-To: <000101d4ee15$efeb5bd0$cfc21370$@windstream.net> References: <000101d4ee15$efeb5bd0$cfc21370$@windstream.net> Message-ID: <5cab5df8.1c69fb81.2a6ce.335c@mx.google.com> FYI Martin F. Jue is a graduate of Mississippi State University there in Starkville, MS. He is a ham and a great supporter of ham radio here in the SE. Most vendors want big turnouts for hamfests and do not consider the smaller ones for participation. MFJ has always supported our local hamfests here in the Birmingham area. Jim, W4ATK Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Dick Dickinson Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 9:18 AM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] MFJ, Elecraft, Cultures If different companies can be valued differently by individuals, why is it taboo to do so with cultures? It seems to me that the people that used to say, "I don't like labels," now slap a label on every person or thought that does not meet their notion of fashionable memes. .and to Ken. Humor most often has a victim. At the rate we are going, there won't be much to laugh about in the future. Dick - KA5KKT ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From n9aa at arrl.net Mon Apr 8 10:45:57 2019 From: n9aa at arrl.net (Scott Manthe) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 10:45:57 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] MFJ, Elecraft, Cultures In-Reply-To: <000101d4ee15$efeb5bd0$cfc21370$@windstream.net> References: <000101d4ee15$efeb5bd0$cfc21370$@windstream.net> Message-ID: <3a8787b5-6bec-a408-38c1-2bae772fc742@arrl.net> You miss the point entirely. Martin Jue is an American. He is not of a different nationality or culture. As to your other point, yes, humor does have victims. The people who have most often been the victims of much of our humor have decided they don't like it, which is their right as human beings. There is and will be plenty to laugh about. We just have to decide if we want to laugh at people because they are different or with them because we are the same. 73, Scott N9AA On 4/8/19 10:18 AM, Dick Dickinson wrote: > If different companies can be valued differently by individuals, why is it > taboo to do so with cultures? > > > > It seems to me that the people that used to say, "I don't like labels," now > slap a label on every person or thought that does not meet their notion of > fashionable memes. > > > > .and to Ken. Humor most often has a victim. At the rate we are going, > there won't be much to laugh about in the future. > > > > > > Dick - KA5KKT > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From maccluer13 at gmail.com Mon Apr 8 10:46:55 2019 From: maccluer13 at gmail.com (Chuck MacCluer) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:46:55 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Automatic tuner implementation Message-ID: Finding a tuner solution need not be an iterative process --- there is a simple two-step approach if you measure the right parameter as you tune. See QEX, Nov/Dec 2016, p. 3. Chuck MacCluer w8mqw From donwilh at embarqmail.com Mon Apr 8 11:03:09 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:03:09 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Automatic tuner implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Chuck, I believe that is quite possible, but requires a more sophisticated measurement of the transmission line parameters that the Forward power and reverse power provided by a wattmeter. Measure the parameters of the transmission line and calculate the network needed to bring those parameters to a 50 ohm non-reactive load. It took a great deal of time to do the math when I was in college, but we did not have computers back in the early 1960s. The principle is the same. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/8/2019 10:46 AM, Chuck MacCluer wrote: > Finding a tuner solution need not be an iterative process --- there is a > simple two-step approach if you measure the right parameter as you tune. > See QEX, Nov/Dec 2016, p. 3. Chuck MacCluer w8mqw > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From bill at wjschmidt.com Mon Apr 8 11:03:26 2019 From: bill at wjschmidt.com (Dr. William J. Schmidt) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 10:03:26 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Automatic tuner implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <12e901d4ee1c$38505230$a8f0f690$@wjschmidt.com> Ideally... yes, practically... no. Given the load impedance and the ideal impedance, you can always calculate a transfer function that is exact (simply the path of movement on a Smith chart). However, the question then becomes how good are your measurements? A high performance line section and detector (log amp or other) has at best an error of +/- 1db in linearity and resolution. The step size of the tuning elements adds more uncertainty. Bottom line here is that what seems easy can be difficult. -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chuck MacCluer Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 9:47 AM To: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Automatic tuner implementation Finding a tuner solution need not be an iterative process --- there is a simple two-step approach if you measure the right parameter as you tune. See QEX, Nov/Dec 2016, p. 3. Chuck MacCluer w8mqw ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From eric at elecraft.com Mon Apr 8 11:06:44 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 08:06:44 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] MFJ, Elecraft, Cultures In-Reply-To: <3a8787b5-6bec-a408-38c1-2bae772fc742@arrl.net> References: <000101d4ee15$efeb5bd0$cfc21370$@windstream.net> <3a8787b5-6bec-a408-38c1-2bae772fc742@arrl.net> Message-ID: Folks - Let's let this and the related MFJ threads rest for now. Thread(s) closed. 73, Eric Moderator /elecraft.com/ From phystad at mac.com Mon Apr 8 11:07:51 2019 From: phystad at mac.com (Phil Hystad) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 08:07:51 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Technical question on keying of an SDR radio In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Wayne, Thanks for the explanation. I should have realized that it might have been documented. My question was prompted by the appearance of a question posted to the "ham radio" formum of Stack Exhange on-line. The OP (original post) of the question mentioned looking at a 1976 ARRL Handbook and seeing a circuit for the keying and wanted an explanation of how that circuit worked. The answers (at the time I read the post) were somewhat simplistic and directed to the circuit that was shown in the question which of course was technology going back to the 1940s or before. Thus, I was curious of the improvements possible with DSP. Thanks, phil, K7PEH > On Apr 7, 2019, at 10:25 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote: > > By the way, a similar explanation can be found in the Theory of Operation section of any of our transceiver manuals. > > Wayne > N6KR > > >> On Apr 7, 2019, at 9:58 PM, Phil Hystad via Elecraft wrote: >> >> If you look at various old circuit diagrams of ancient radios made from electronic circuits you find that the telegraph keying for the radio involves switching on and off the driving oscillator frequency or something similar. >> >> However, with an SDR, you have other options and I have no idea how it is typically done. For example, a digital signal can be produced that represents the Morse coding and this signal need merely be converted to analog and amplified. Or, is there still an analog circuit being switched on and off for Morse code (telegraphy) keying with a modern SDR. >> >> Can someone describe how this is done in a radio like the KX2. And, is it done differently in the different Elecraft radios ? I presume that the K2 would have the more traditional sort of circuit but that is really just a wild guess on my part. >> >> 73, phil, K7PEH > From maccluer13 at gmail.com Mon Apr 8 11:15:26 2019 From: maccluer13 at gmail.com (Chuck MacCluer) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:15:26 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Automatic tuner implementation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I should have added that QEX failed to print the third page of my article "How to tune an L-network matchbox" until "Letters to the Editor" in the Jan/Feb 2017 issue. Moreover, my careless dismissing of the low Z case, |Z|< 50, was corrected by K6JCA in "Letters," Mar/Apr issue. If these QEX issues are unavailable, feel free to write me for preprints. Chuck MacCluer, w8mqw at arrl.net On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 2:46 PM Chuck MacCluer wrote: > Finding a tuner solution need not be an iterative process --- there is a > simple two-step approach if you measure the right parameter as you tune. > See QEX, Nov/Dec 2016, p. 3. Chuck MacCluer w8mqw > From numbnutz33 at verizon.net Mon Apr 8 11:47:30 2019 From: numbnutz33 at verizon.net (Steve Forst) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:47:30 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 alarm Message-ID: <43bf68c7-e1a2-f31a-0783-2e5d478ad49e@verizon.net> I'm a blind owner of a KPA500/KAT500 for several years, married to a TS-590SG. The alarm that sounds when the amp faults (rarely) is impossible to hear when wearing headphones. I've stuck a microphone element near the radio and connected it to the mixer I use to put radio audio and computer speech into the headphones. On CW, and with the mic level set low enough, I could hear the alarm without getting other shack noise, but not practical for SSB operation. 2 questions: 1. Where does the sound actually come from on the amp? If I knew where it comes out of the case, I would concentrate there. 2. Is it possible to trigger the alarm with a software command or something? I don't want to put the amp into intentional fault just for purposes of experimentation. My amp faults infrequently, mostly 80/160 if ever, but would still like to know if the alarm sounds. Tnx for any thoughts, I get this on digest, so am on a slight delay. Steve KW3A From ktalbott at gamewood.net Mon Apr 8 11:44:19 2019 From: ktalbott at gamewood.net (ktalbott) Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2019 11:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: MFJ Message-ID: <20190408084919.EA12A193@m0116952.ppops.net> To me MFJ is the Harbor Freight of ham radio. When you can't afford the very best, when you use the gear within (perhaps limited) spec and with a little TLC, it allows you to scratch an itch you could not otherwise afford. I am glad they're there. I love Elecraft and will fill my needs there when I can afford it.Ken ke4rgSent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy S10+. From a.durbin at msn.com Mon Apr 8 13:40:45 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:40:45 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 alarm Message-ID: The alarm signal is available on AUX1 connector pin 7 and is pulled low when an alarm is active. I have it permanently connected to my data logger and have used it as a trigger for my storage 'scope. It could be used to drive an external alarm of any sort that you chose. 73, Andy k3wyc From Hamshack at N4ST.com Mon Apr 8 13:41:58 2019 From: Hamshack at N4ST.com (Jim - N4ST) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:41:58 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] My "MFJ Posting" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <017001d4ee32$627d95c0$2778c140$@N4ST.com> Ken, The Internet has created a mob of hyper-sensitive hype-critical keyboard warriors. Any comment, including this one is likely to bring on the slings and arrows. With respect to ham gear, yes, roughly speaking you get what you pay for, but sometimes marginal performance is much better than no performance. Most of the MFJ stuff I have purchased has served the purpose, especially in my younger years when more expensive alternatives were out of reach. I also drive Fords & Chevys and not Range Rovers and Mercedes. ___________ 73, Jim - N4ST -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Ken G Kopp Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 08:16 To: Elecraft Subject: [Elecraft] My "MFJ Posting" I am dismayed at the view some took of my posting. I intended absolutely no racial or eletist content ... in any way ... and apologize to anyone who read it that way. 73 ! Ken Kopp - K0PP ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From a.durbin at msn.com Mon Apr 8 13:56:26 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:56:26 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 alarm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I should have added that the alarm is also available on the PC serial interface. Interrogating the KPA500 with ^FL; will return the current fault value in the form ^FLnn; where nn is a 2 digit number indicating the current fault (00 for no fault). It would be possible to use this fault report to vocalize the actual fault condition and play that fault message through your headphones. 73, Andy, k3wyc ________________________________ From: Andy Durbin Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 10:40 AM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: KPA500 alarm The alarm signal is available on AUX1 connector pin 7 and is pulled low when an alarm is active. I have it permanently connected to my data logger and have used it as a trigger for my storage 'scope. It could be used to drive an external alarm of any sort that you chose. 73, Andy k3wyc From billamader at gmail.com Mon Apr 8 14:34:24 2019 From: billamader at gmail.com (K8TE) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 11:34:24 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] new KPA1500 Manual In-Reply-To: <20190329153223.3E4F0149B25E@mailman.qth.net> References: <5C9D3B96.7030700@roadrunner.com> <20190329153223.3E4F0149B25E@mailman.qth.net> Message-ID: <1554748464921-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Right on! First, I have over two decades of experience with replacing printed pages in Air Force Technical Orders. What a PITA, but necessary. Today, those are distributed electronically and printed locally. Often, it's not possible to make a change that affects only one page since the change, often an addition, pushes information on to the next page. Thanks to Elecraft (not all manufactures do this), we can annotate the PDF versions with the latest firmware notes, ideas from this reflector, our just our own pointers. The PDF then becomes a current, searchable document of great value! As I point out in my ham radio presentations, it's 2019. We do a lot of things with computers now. Join the 21st century. The technology has certain advantages, especially if you back-up your data. 73, Bill, K8TE -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From sprint63al at comcast.net Mon Apr 8 14:40:36 2019 From: sprint63al at comcast.net (James a larkin) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:40:36 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 Message-ID: Is there a way to update my KAT2 to the newest Algorithm used in the later tuners ? Jim KA2FFP From donwilh at embarqmail.com Mon Apr 8 14:57:38 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:57:38 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <04b0b612-1b6b-c811-cfd9-0ad8bbd47b39@embarqmail.com> Jim, Certainly, just order and install the latest KAT2 firmware. FWKAT2 on the website Quick Order form. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/8/2019 2:40 PM, James a larkin wrote: > Is there a way to update my KAT2 to the newest Algorithm used in the later tuners ? > From k6dgw at foothill.net Mon Apr 8 15:08:57 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 12:08:57 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] new KPA1500 Manual In-Reply-To: <1554748464921-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <5C9D3B96.7030700@roadrunner.com> <20190329153223.3E4F0149B25E@mailman.qth.net> <1554748464921-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <9696fd5b-de33-6f11-716c-31c6c74a861e@foothill.net> Agreed, the Elecraft PDF's are very good, and I do edit my K3 PDFmanual with notes.? I've never printed it. Since the K3 is an essentially mature product [I haven't made a FW update in a couple of years ... I'm not even sure there has been a release in that period], nearly all the notes I add are "my" notes about things I've learned, obscure menu settings, and the like. That said, in 2019, the term "searchable" is sometimes overrated. Searchable implies that you have some idea of what you're looking for.? Often, at least for me, a spiral bound book that lays flat on the desk and I can write in with a table of contents and an index is ideal.? I bought the spiral bound version of the KE7X book for just that reason.? I have a station journal [notebook - old engineering habit] and most of my annotations are to a volume/page where I've written about or recorded something.? It may be 2019 but the latest and greatest doesn't always replace the tried and true.? CW may be a good example. [:-) New subject:? The quoted post below is all I got on the Elecraft list.? I don't know what prompted it.? It will lubricate the information flow on the list if the relevant posts in a thread are left in ... at least the one you're replying to. 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/8/2019 11:34 AM, K8TE wrote: > Right on! First, I have over two decades of experience with replacing > printed pages in Air Force Technical Orders. What a PITA, but necessary. > Today, those are distributed electronically and printed locally. Often, > it's not possible to make a change that affects only one page since the > change, often an addition, pushes information on to the next page. > > Thanks to Elecraft (not all manufactures do this), we can annotate the PDF > versions with the latest firmware notes, ideas from this reflector, our just > our own pointers. The PDF then becomes a current, searchable document of > great value! > > As I point out in my ham radio presentations, it's 2019. We do a lot of > things with computers now. Join the 21st century. The technology has > certain advantages, especially if you back-up your data. > > 73, Bill, K8TE > From markmusick at outlook.com Mon Apr 8 15:20:16 2019 From: markmusick at outlook.com (Mark Musick) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 19:20:16 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 In-Reply-To: <04b0b612-1b6b-c811-cfd9-0ad8bbd47b39@embarqmail.com> References: <04b0b612-1b6b-c811-cfd9-0ad8bbd47b39@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: Jim, Before you order the FWKAT2, you should check to see what firmware version is currently installed in the KAT2. I don't remember how to check the version number. It has been some time since I did that and found I had the latest version. If I remember correctly it is version1.07. Don probably knows off the top of his head what the current version is and can guide you through the menus to find what version Is currently installed in your KAT2. 73, Mark, WB9CIF -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Don Wilhelm Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 18:58 To: James a larkin ; elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 Jim, Certainly, just order and install the latest KAT2 firmware. FWKAT2 on the website Quick Order form. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/8/2019 2:40 PM, James a larkin wrote: > Is there a way to update my KAT2 to the newest Algorithm used in the later tuners ? > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From dave at nk7z.net Mon Apr 8 16:06:22 2019 From: dave at nk7z.net (Dave Cole (NK7Z)) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 13:06:22 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Using a K3 to route antenna signals to external devices... Message-ID: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> A few months ago someone asked how to move the antenna signal coming in on the main antenna connector of a K3 to an external SDR via some connector in the rear of the K3. The answer indicated connecting the SDR antenna to some connector in the rear of the radio, and pressing some number of front panel keys to route the signals from the antenna to the SDR... Can someone point me at that post, or tell me how this is accomplished? The RF Signal flow on the K3 has always eluded me. Also, is the output from the K3 at zero or close to zero when transmitting? i.e. is it safe for the SDR? -- 73s and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Technical Specialist ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL OOC for Oregon From donwilh at embarqmail.com Mon Apr 8 16:21:34 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:21:34 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 In-Reply-To: References: <04b0b612-1b6b-c811-cfd9-0ad8bbd47b39@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: I don't believe the KAT2 tuning algorithm has changed since day 1, but Wayne might chime in with a verification. I have never tried to check the KAT2 firmware version "from the menus/buttons"? If I needed to check it, I would have been in the middle of a repair, and it is easy to separate the two boards to check. One option that needs the latest version is the K60XV, and support for 60 meters needs KAT2 version 1.07. Without the K60XV, version 1.05 will do just fine. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/8/2019 3:20 PM, Mark Musick wrote: > Jim, > Before you order the FWKAT2, you should check to see what firmware version is currently installed in the KAT2. > I don't remember how to check the version number. It has been some time since I did that and found I had the latest version. > If I remember correctly it is version1.07. > Don probably knows off the top of his head what the current version is and can guide you through the menus to find what version > Is currently installed in your KAT2. > > 73, > Mark, WB9CIF > > -----Original Message----- > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Don Wilhelm > Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 18:58 > To: James a larkin ; elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 > > Jim, > > Certainly, just order and install the latest KAT2 firmware. FWKAT2 on the website Quick Order form. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/8/2019 2:40 PM, James a larkin wrote: >> Is there a way to update my KAT2 to the newest Algorithm used in the later tuners ? >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From lists at subich.com Mon Apr 8 16:22:12 2019 From: lists at subich.com (Joe Subich, W4TV) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:22:12 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Using a K3 to route antenna signals to external devices... In-Reply-To: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> References: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> Message-ID: > The answer indicated connecting the SDR antenna to some connector in > the rear of the radio, and pressing some number of front panel keys > to route the signals from the antenna to the SDR... Connect a splitter, input to the RX Ant Out jack, one output to the RX ANT IN jack and the other output to the Antenna input of your SDR. Press the RX ANT button to activate the RX ANTENNA Out/RX ANT IN path. > Also, is the output from the K3 at zero or close to zero when > transmitting? i.e. is it safe for the SDR? Yes, the RX ANT Out/IN path is on the receive side of the T/R switch. There is no RF (or only leakage) present in transmit. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2019-04-08 4:06 PM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote: > A few months ago someone asked how to move the antenna signal coming in > on the main antenna connector of a K3 to an external SDR via some > connector in the rear of the K3. > > The answer indicated connecting the SDR antenna to some connector in the > rear of the radio, and pressing some number of front panel keys to route > the signals from the antenna to the SDR... > > Can someone point me at that post, or tell me how this is accomplished? > The RF Signal flow on the K3 has always eluded me. > > Also, is the output from the K3 at zero or close to zero when > transmitting? i.e. is it safe for the SDR? > From donwilh at embarqmail.com Mon Apr 8 16:27:46 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:27:46 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Using a K3 to route antenna signals to external devices... In-Reply-To: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> References: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> Message-ID: <9d67a871-2c34-ab98-43df-cd558d97fc0b@embarqmail.com> Dave, Look for a post by Bob McGraw. In brief, it takes a TEE adapter and 2 short pieces of coax. Put the adapter between the 2 pieces of coax, and then connect one coax to ANT OUT and the other to ANT IN. The SDR is connected to the TEE adapter. To get output to the SDR, you must set the K3 for the RX ANT. If you are not interested in a multi-band input to the SDR, but only the K3 IF (for a panadapter application), then you can simply connect the SDR to the K3 IF OUT and set the SDR to tune 8.215MHz. In both cases, the SDR will be protected during transmit. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/8/2019 4:06 PM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote: > A few months ago someone asked how to move the antenna signal coming in > on the main antenna connector of a K3 to an external SDR via some > connector in the rear of the K3. > > The answer indicated connecting the SDR antenna to some connector in the > rear of the radio, and pressing some number of front panel keys to route > the signals from the antenna to the SDR... > From rmcgraw at blomand.net Mon Apr 8 16:31:57 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 15:31:57 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Using a K3 to route antenna signals to external devices... In-Reply-To: References: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> Message-ID: <1a543573-f781-2637-a3fc-649ac8629a98@blomand.net> I agree with Joe in the procedure.?? As to using or the need for a "splitter", I don't find the input impedance of the SDR Play/RSP1 to be anywhere near 50 ohms. ? In fact it is much higher. ?? Thus the result of using a simple BNC "T" does not load the signal of the main receiver.? If your SDR receiver does present a 50 ohm input, then you can expect to loose about 3 dB of received signal. And correct, the SDR will be protected when one is transmitting. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/8/2019 3:22 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: > > >> The answer indicated connecting the SDR antenna to some connector in >> the rear of the radio, and pressing some number of front panel keys >> to route the signals from the antenna to the SDR... > Connect a splitter, input to the RX Ant Out jack, one output to the > RX ANT IN jack and the other output to the Antenna input of your SDR. > > Press the RX ANT button to activate the RX ANTENNA Out/RX ANT IN path. > > > Also, is the output from the K3 at zero or close to zero when > > transmitting? i.e. is it safe for the SDR? > > Yes, the RX ANT Out/IN path is on the receive side of the T/R switch. > There is no RF (or only leakage) present in transmit. > > 73, > > ?? ... Joe, W4TV > From dave at nk7z.net Mon Apr 8 17:03:55 2019 From: dave at nk7z.net (Dave Cole (NK7Z)) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 14:03:55 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Using a K3 to route antenna signals to external devices... In-Reply-To: <1a543573-f781-2637-a3fc-649ac8629a98@blomand.net> References: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> <1a543573-f781-2637-a3fc-649ac8629a98@blomand.net> Message-ID: <82742ca8-6611-4701-559d-14d78dbe9f6c@nk7z.net> Thank you gents! Now to uppack my KPA500 which came back from support today... 73s and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Technical Specialist ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL OOC for Oregon On 4/8/19 1:31 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > I agree with Joe in the procedure.?? As to using or the need for a > "splitter", I don't find the input impedance of the SDR Play/RSP1 to be > anywhere near 50 ohms. ? In fact it is much higher. ?? Thus the result > of using a simple BNC "T" does not load the signal of the main > receiver.? If your SDR receiver does present a 50 ohm input, then you > can expect to loose about 3 dB of received signal. > > And correct, the SDR will be protected when one is transmitting. > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX > > > On 4/8/2019 3:22 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: >> >> >>> The answer indicated connecting the SDR antenna to some connector in >>> the rear of the radio, and pressing some number of front panel keys >>> to route the signals from the antenna to the SDR... >> Connect a splitter, input to the RX Ant Out jack, one output to the >> RX ANT IN jack and the other output to the Antenna input of your SDR. >> >> Press the RX ANT button to activate the RX ANTENNA Out/RX ANT IN path. >> >> > Also, is the output from the K3 at zero or close to zero when >> > transmitting? i.e. is it safe for the SDR? >> >> Yes, the RX ANT Out/IN path is on the receive side of the T/R switch. >> There is no RF (or only leakage) present in transmit. >> >> 73, >> >> ?? ... Joe, W4TV >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From lists at subich.com Mon Apr 8 17:15:13 2019 From: lists at subich.com (Joe Subich, W4TV) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 17:15:13 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Using a K3 to route antenna signals to external devices... In-Reply-To: <1a543573-f781-2637-a3fc-649ac8629a98@blomand.net> References: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> <1a543573-f781-2637-a3fc-649ac8629a98@blomand.net> Message-ID: <7593b0f2-b5de-16f2-69bb-d25256ecf142@subich.com> On 2019-04-08 4:31 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > I don't find the input impedance of the SDR Play/RSP1 to be > anywhere near 50 ohms. In fact it is much higher. Thus the result > of using a simple BNC "T" does not load the signal of the main > receiver. However, since the K3 receiver is relatively close to 50 Ohms, it *WILL* load the input of SDRs with high input impedance - to the extent that the SDR *can* lose 10 dB or more of sensitivity. The splitter works to protect the sensitivity of *BOTH* receivers - if that were not the case why do you think Wayne bothered to include a splitter in the design for the KRX3! 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2019-04-08 4:31 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > I agree with Joe in the procedure.?? As to using or the need for a > "splitter", I don't find the input impedance of the SDR Play/RSP1 to be > anywhere near 50 ohms. ? In fact it is much higher. ?? Thus the result > of using a simple BNC "T" does not load the signal of the main > receiver.? If your SDR receiver does present a 50 ohm input, then you > can expect to loose about 3 dB of received signal. > > And correct, the SDR will be protected when one is transmitting. > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX > > > On 4/8/2019 3:22 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: >> >> >>> The answer indicated connecting the SDR antenna to some connector in >>> the rear of the radio, and pressing some number of front panel keys >>> to route the signals from the antenna to the SDR... >> Connect a splitter, input to the RX Ant Out jack, one output to the >> RX ANT IN jack and the other output to the Antenna input of your SDR. >> >> Press the RX ANT button to activate the RX ANTENNA Out/RX ANT IN path. >> >> > Also, is the output from the K3 at zero or close to zero when >> > transmitting? i.e. is it safe for the SDR? >> >> Yes, the RX ANT Out/IN path is on the receive side of the T/R switch. >> There is no RF (or only leakage) present in transmit. >> >> 73, >> >> ?? ... Joe, W4TV >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From mtrager1 at twc.com Mon Apr 8 18:13:36 2019 From: mtrager1 at twc.com (Michael Trager) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 18:13:36 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] For Sale K3 Station Message-ID: <002201d4ee58$51776960$f4663c20$@twc.com> Want to own a Elecraft K3 that has most of the "S" upgrades installed including the 2 Meter Module? I am the original owner/builder (non smoker) of serial #5785 purchased in August of 2011 and it includes: K3 100Watt Upgrade KAT3 ATU KTCX03-1 upgraded TCXO Ref Osc. 2.7 KHz Upgraded Filter KBPF3 General Coverage RX Module updated to "S" version KFL3A-6K AM Filter KFL3B-FM FM 8-Pole Roofing Filter KDVR3 Digital Voice Recorder KFL3A 400 Hz 8-Pole Roofing Filter K144XV-100-K 2 Meter Module K144RFLK Reference Lock Module P3-K Panadapter with all cables KIO3BUPKT KIO3B "S" version upgrade Kit KSYN3AUPG KSYN3A "S" version synthesizer upgrade Kit KXV3B "S" version RX Antenna, IF Out, Preamp, Transverter Interface Kit KBPF3 General Coverage Rcvr Mod Kit for "S" version. CBLP3Y K3S Adapter Cable for existing P3 Owners This K3 updated "S" Kit was built by me and is in excellent working condition. Asking price is $3500.00 plus shipping CONUSA. Station will ship via USPS Priority Mail/ Insured and will be expertly packed. You can have this excellent station and save a lot of money! Please contact me off the reflector at: mtrager1 at twc.com http://n2zdb.com/n2zdb/Station.jpg From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Mon Apr 8 19:14:40 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 16:14:40 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Using a K3 to route antenna signals to external devices... In-Reply-To: <7593b0f2-b5de-16f2-69bb-d25256ecf142@subich.com> References: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> <1a543573-f781-2637-a3fc-649ac8629a98@blomand.net> <7593b0f2-b5de-16f2-69bb-d25256ecf142@subich.com> Message-ID: <20f6e51c-0f7b-fce8-6109-4f939daf14b9@audiosystemsgroup.com> I don't understand the math behind this. The 50 ohm input Z of the K3 terminates the transmission line. The SDR sees whatever voltage is across the K3 input. More to the point, why does it matter?? In most real world stations, especially below VHF, noise from the antenna is sufficiently greater than circuit noise that circuit noise doesn't matter. A ratio of 13 dB satisfies this condition. 73, Jim K9YC On 4/8/2019 2:15 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote: > However, since the K3 receiver is relatively close to 50 Ohms, it > *WILL* load the input of SDRs with high input impedance - to the > extent that the SDR *can* lose 10 dB or more of sensitivity. From hs0zed at gmail.com Mon Apr 8 22:24:09 2019 From: hs0zed at gmail.com (Martin Sole) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:24:09 +0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Using a K3 to route antenna signals to external devices... In-Reply-To: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> References: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> Message-ID: <784d56c3-085b-31c5-4eae-4064124357d3@gmail.com> I've been playing with this sort of setup recently. I have a K3 with a KXV3 and an SDRPlay RSP1. For my usage I find that theP3 is a better option and when I want the display on the PC I have the RSP1 connected to the P3 IF Out and use the software set to accommodate it is working at a fixed IF. I tried connecting the RSP1 with a tee piece and two short pieces of coax to have a separately tunable third receiver but found a lot of unwanted responses on the SDR receivers display. Although I did not investigate very far, switching back to the much more acceptable P3 IF out technique in short order, I can only presume leakage from the K3 is the cause. It could be that I had things 'set wrong' so please feel free to comment but although an impedance matching splitter might not be a necessity it seems to me at least that some sort of buffer ahead of the SDR might well be. Martin, HS0ZED On 09/04/2019 03:06, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote: > A few months ago someone asked how to move the antenna signal coming > in on the main antenna connector of a K3 to an external SDR via some > connector in the rear of the K3. > > The answer indicated connecting the SDR antenna to some connector in > the rear of the radio, and pressing some number of front panel keys to > route the signals from the antenna to the SDR... > > Can someone point me at that post, or tell me how this is > accomplished? The RF Signal flow on the K3 has always eluded me. > > Also, is the output from the K3 at zero or close to zero when > transmitting? i.e. is it safe for the SDR? > From donwilh at embarqmail.com Mon Apr 8 23:15:45 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:15:45 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Using a K3 to route antenna signals to external devices... In-Reply-To: <784d56c3-085b-31c5-4eae-4064124357d3@gmail.com> References: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> <784d56c3-085b-31c5-4eae-4064124357d3@gmail.com> Message-ID: <872e0d0f-1960-c2ed-0d6b-a1577a12748b@embarqmail.com> Martin, Connecting the SDR to the ANT OUT/ANT IN jacks allows the SDR to see the enitire spectrum of the K3 antenna below the cutoff of the Low Pass filters. Thaqt is apt to pick up any responses that are within the range of the SDR tuning, and if there are spurs coming from your antenna (which have nothing to do with the K3) then they will be seen. Using the K3 (or P3) IF OUT will restrict the bandwidth to that near the K3 IF and may not show you those spurs - which are likely coming from devices throughout your house and your neighborhood. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/8/2019 10:24 PM, Martin Sole wrote: > I've been playing with this sort of setup recently. I have a K3 with a > KXV3 and an SDRPlay RSP1. For my usage I find that theP3 is a better > option and when I want the display on the PC I have the RSP1 connected > to the P3 IF Out and use the software set to accommodate it is working > at a fixed IF. > > I tried connecting the RSP1 with a tee piece and two short pieces of > coax to have a separately tunable third receiver but found a lot of > unwanted responses on the SDR receivers display. Although I did not > investigate very far, switching back to the much more acceptable P3 IF > out technique in short order, I can only presume leakage from the K3 is > the cause. > > It could be that I had things 'set wrong' so please feel free to comment > but although an impedance matching splitter might not be a necessity it > seems to me at least that some sort of buffer ahead of the SDR might > well be. > > Martin, HS0ZED > > > On 09/04/2019 03:06, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote: >> A few months ago someone asked how to move the antenna signal coming >> in on the main antenna connector of a K3 to an external SDR via some >> connector in the rear of the K3. >> >> The answer indicated connecting the SDR antenna to some connector in >> the rear of the radio, and pressing some number of front panel keys to >> route the signals from the antenna to the SDR... >> >> Can someone point me at that post, or tell me how this is >> accomplished? The RF Signal flow on the K3 has always eluded me. >> >> Also, is the output from the K3 at zero or close to zero when >> transmitting? i.e. is it safe for the SDR? >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From P.Hall at curtin.edu.au Tue Apr 9 01:52:06 2019 From: P.Hall at curtin.edu.au (Peter Hall) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 05:52:06 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] new KPA1500 Manual In-Reply-To: <1554748464921-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <5C9D3B96.7030700@roadrunner.com> <20190329153223.3E4F0149B25E@mailman.qth.net> <1554748464921-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Bill, Having spent time, over many years, piecemeal updating Jeppersen and CASA (the national aviation regulatory authority) pilot documents, I regard it as wasted time I'll never get back. I hope that Elecraft does not go down this path but agree absolutely that, these days, good searchable PDFs make life much easier. One thing that is always useful is the update register (already often used) and text markers indicating changes from the previous edition (often vertical bars at affected paragraphs). On the subject of the KPA1500 manual, I have much appreciated the additions to the original document but would like to see the block diagram expanded to make it more useful in terms of appreciating the amplifier topology and the relation to connectors, etc. For example, the current very terse diagram does not show the pre-distortion coupler or its location and, if you hadn't had a spectrum analyser on the amplifier, you might not appreciate that it's not a direct output coupler. Of course, I'd like to see the whole schematic but I understand that it must be a tricky commercial IP balancing act with a new product. 73, Peter (VK6HP). -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of K8TE Sent: Tuesday, 9 April 2019 2:34 AM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] new KPA1500 Manual Right on! First, I have over two decades of experience with replacing printed pages in Air Force Technical Orders. What a PITA, but necessary. Today, those are distributed electronically and printed locally. Often, it's not possible to make a change that affects only one page since the change, often an addition, pushes information on to the next page. Thanks to Elecraft (not all manufactures do this), we can annotate the PDF versions with the latest firmware notes, ideas from this reflector, our just our own pointers. The PDF then becomes a current, searchable document of great value! As I point out in my ham radio presentations, it's 2019. We do a lot of things with computers now. Join the 21st century. The technology has certain advantages, especially if you back-up your data. 73, Bill, K8TE -- Sent from: http://secure-web.cisco.com/1ly5jG_z3c_ghFK4l_kVBFZrlCKkrMidJYBdwHxcCu3z2lgrmQrao4hnCsJiXrJi0GQVeY5htK-Vh4dQ16ZnFIQU-gBLNh6WwLOG-Pobdsz2l7JPiP-RZfnKzhbShygqpsgyBIbiKZoHEfIG4ZavEgPnhBX124hZDghSJKQTxsh71sJ6EZ8YRh8rxDE9XfyHRiHT1L5tI6UEq-mq43tNLo37ylKZzIGeqbUGidwyuqwiWd1g7He9T7MuWFpLGW7trTaVoSyd23L_IO-4AvaRTaCrYHBtYK-f3Dd90aPLnsyuR2wQXsnHXTnSeOEwNLKL_ye1IsOk-ulrUpbgI-5U5sJjsDXugiwFsOWxQkuI2QHT-wWKA5XNhToEUZtd0r8JnXq9o51L1kiPSFnmlgDqW3ENGmGd2FtGAxrU9UQjmeBWXpyBYm0pkl0WpvaFfGiPUzqDdhKwKLQYBg7WAcp2GLQ-XHIYS_hNpcS5M5NIHPEQ/http%3A%2F%2Felecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com%2F ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://secure-web.cisco.com/15Xu-tgWxGQXmtH17CkIuIwXVaL8qUYmdndVBK0xxyOmLymTGEAlA0Geea95i-no3tp_bPZBNggdFpXObVRtLe8WhkU5sWwCdt_anhUUszZE-jSAupHNd-5ONp_8CsgKAsSi2lpvNlqKZTbBSEHth92SLHqbEnyh6LClTOebVR9BiExmqTX_3W6qp1c9jnYlzmvX8X97TQUoo7mRBhoJ--dww3ybGz4fahocE3zYjz-RKP8XOF2qLAib_1H88L6vSMdLB8-gYJllrGE2m2pkekZK4oEI1CKRCrIVw9a2XFUQFUWmql3AvsNRAFMpqS_-DDVQrU9IZY9Jye6sHW-KP_Vw0N7lP0gQ6MkZxNe_cQvM1fF5s9wANN2NHXVYLcoaJUTYK6jgU1FH0DCOKMcEaF5YlXYRJZmjZybu5xMReoHxVeF80cgdW2zypuzn2OnK60AasxTi8gdRTZCiYNYGGEzTpa7XYQH7_aJSrblWPS4g/http%3A%2F%2Fmailman.qth.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Felecraft Help: http://secure-web.cisco.com/1cujNAln9yePUe_hD0GtSsEil37DEFfqz1ns3hNMNkkhEfxMRkZE2DNaxChG6wEdLZJbhxrLIlkdsZYL9emd6163d3yNdvVZhkXk0Q2LsFq3s3Ma4FK6zKipikd13Nof-UTrDYfU53JFlk2t1UzU6qEl4s5j_XKABA96zXVw3ZMMbUTPdeB1FY4AQqoxdeZsYljmDI-wDQseFKrnJCw-Pk3qw4KyrAgHlmK5YTH3kAI-7dCa4N7-AL4CicYbxwz4B-xNZ4vp8l-vLCQVtyi3ZENhYM2evZFpFZtTr6mVq5gtXU0RTrRACavcnHgAVO46lv9gByBE8tmpigzySKG8DjNzZB5spxNq06Q4wviQAKexbSLh5XgvMZcfUcN7XP-o-V4EA_-IPjfVd_9FdUo2Ltjx_xULVvYFnHMPFbrulBZXGKroEol3MyIECvXreKRt1__8XKifMQRxo2VIYLHqND_vSMfJ95nQo5IHDbkoqVRA/http%3A%2F%2Fmailman.qth.net%2Fmmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Tue Apr 9 02:06:05 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2019 23:06:05 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] new KPA1500 Manual In-Reply-To: References: <5C9D3B96.7030700@roadrunner.com> <20190329153223.3E4F0149B25E@mailman.qth.net> <1554748464921-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: On 4/8/2019 10:52 PM, Peter Hall wrote: > Having spent time, over many years, piecemeal updating Jeppersen and CASA (the national aviation regulatory authority) pilot documents, I regard it as wasted time I'll never get back. I hope that Elecraft does not go down this path but agree absolutely that, these days, good searchable PDFs make life much easier. One thing that is always useful is the update register (already often used) and text markers indicating changes from the previous edition (often vertical bars at affected paragraphs). Yes. This is the modern equivalent of those update methods of yesteryear, and a manual that is in any decent publishing application that can produce a pdf is trivially easy to update and to highlight changes. I consider such practice, along with a "change" list in the form of an appendix or separate document, to be the right way to do it. Any competent tech writer ought to be able make the edits and load the updated manual in no more than a half hour after the editing is complete. I can get a new or updated document on my own website in half that time if there's already a link to it on the main page, another 10-15 minutes if it's a new document for which a new link is needed. 73, Jim K9YC From david at g7idb.uk Tue Apr 9 05:15:46 2019 From: david at g7idb.uk (David Cripps) Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2019 10:15:46 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] Request - KXPD2, KXPD1 and KXB3080 Message-ID: <5CAC62C2.9070308@g7idb.uk> Hi Although I've been a ham for nearly 30 years, I've been out the hobby for the last 25 of them and am now learning Morse again to get into QRP. I have recently bought a KX1 and KX2 and would like to get the paddles for them, so if anybody has a KXPD2 or KXPD1 for sale please let me know (I'm in the UK if that makes any difference). The KX1 has the ATU but only 40M and 20M, so again if you have a KXB3080 for sale, let me know. It's great to be back in the hobby and on the air (although I do feel like a novice, albeit with a Full or Advance licence!). Thanks and 73s David G7IDB From k2vco.vic at gmail.com Tue Apr 9 06:08:45 2019 From: k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:08:45 +0300 Subject: [Elecraft] Technical question on keying of an SDR radio In-Reply-To: <9B387C03-9EBA-4031-895D-36BBF909CD83@elecraft.com> References: <9B387C03-9EBA-4031-895D-36BBF909CD83@elecraft.com> Message-ID: <259eddab-d4d2-15e0-0802-4fa4e2d33ad7@gmail.com> Oh no! NOW you tell me that all these years that I have believed that I have been operating CW, it's really SSB! (Disclaimer to avoid the otherwise inevitable explanations that a pure audio tone transmitted via SSB is identical with CW: I know that). 73, Victor, 4X6GP Rehovot, Israel Formerly K2VCO CWops no. 5 http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ On 8 Apr 2019 08:24, Wayne Burdick wrote: > Hi Phil, > > In the K2 the sidetone starts off as a squarewave created by the > microcontroller. This is then shaped and injected into the AF > amplifier. The sidetone is turned on/off at the same time as the > carrier, which is generated by the LO (PLL synth) mixing with a gated > TX BFO signal. > > In our DSP-based radios (K3/K3S and KX2/KX3), both the audio sidetone > and the 15 kHz 2nd IF carrier are created by the DSP. Their rising > edges are shaped mathematically using what's called a "raised cosine" > or sigmodal waveform. We experimented to find the ideal waveform > equation, the result being the cleaned signal possible, with > virtually no key clicks. The DSP can of course do other things like > apply amplitude or frequency modulation, generate voice and data mode > signals, apply ALC and audio EQ, etc. CW is just the simplest case of > what can be done. > > From the DSP, the digitized audio signal codes to a DAC (part of the > audio CODEC IC), which then converts it to analog for injection into > the AF amp. > > The 15 kHz 2nd IF carrier in the K3/K3S goes to a transmit mixer on > the KREF4 module where it's up-converted to about 8215 kHz. It is > then routed to the first IF mixer. The 8215 kHz signal passes through > two crystal filters enroute mixer. In the KX2/KX3, the 15 kHz IF > signal is converted to a pair of IQ signals (90 degrees out of phase > with each other) to directly modulate a quadrature up-converter. The > other input to the up-converter is a pair of balanced LO signals, > again separated by 90 degrees. A result of IQ modulation is that one > sideband is cancelled out, resulting in a single RF carrier at the > desired frequency. > > In all cases, the rest of the T/R sequencing involves the usual > amplifiers, PIN diodes, filter switching, etc. > > 73, Wayne N6KR From svholm54 at gmail.com Tue Apr 9 06:48:55 2019 From: svholm54 at gmail.com (Sverre Holm (LA3ZA)) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 03:48:55 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Using a K3 to route antenna signals to external devices... In-Reply-To: <9d67a871-2c34-ab98-43df-cd558d97fc0b@embarqmail.com> References: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> <9d67a871-2c34-ab98-43df-cd558d97fc0b@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <1554806935784-0.post@n2.nabble.com> But what if there is a PR6-10 preamp in this path. Where should the splitter/TEE-adapter be in that case? >In brief, it takes a TEE adapter and 2 short pieces of coax. Put the >adapter between the 2 pieces of coax, and then connect one coax to ANT >OUT and the other to ANT IN. ----- Sverre, LA3ZA K2 #2198, K3 #3391, LA3ZA Blog: http://la3za.blogspot.com, LA3ZA Unofficial Guide to K2 modifications: http://la3za.blogspot.com/p/la3za-unofficial-guide-to-elecraft-k2.html -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From billamader at gmail.com Tue Apr 9 07:46:14 2019 From: billamader at gmail.com (Bill Mader) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 05:46:14 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] new KPA1500 Manual In-Reply-To: References: <5C9D3B96.7030700@roadrunner.com> <20190329153223.3E4F0149B25E@mailman.qth.net> <1554748464921-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: I agree with your comments on the amplifier's manual Peter. Getting tech data right is a challenge. I spent my last six years in the USAF at a Major Command HQ where I would visit our primary depot twice a year to discuss product improvement. Tech data was a key part of those meetings. Even though most of our troubleshooting stopped at the module replacement level, we had schematics for each module. One year while I was at the base level I got to train a pair of Iranian Air Force sergeants depot level troubleshooting and repair on a UHF ground-to-air transceiver. My background in ham radio gave me the needed understanding of electronics to do that. I will see Elecraft folks at the IDXC in Visalia this coming weekend. I'll likely have dinner with Bob, K6XX, the KPA1500 project manager Saturday night. I'll pass on your thoughts. BTW, I've pushed my KPA1500 hard in two SSB contests already this year. It has performed flawlessly. 73, Bill Mader, K8TE W6H NM Coordinator, Route 66 On-the-Air 7-15 Sep 2019 ARRL New Mexico Section Manager *ARRL - The national association for Amateur Radio**?* Duke City Hamfest BoD www.dukecityhamfest.org 20-22 Sep 2019 President, Albuquerque DX Association On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 11:52 PM Peter Hall wrote: > Bill, > > Having spent time, over many years, piecemeal updating Jeppersen and CASA > (the national aviation regulatory authority) pilot documents, I regard it > as wasted time I'll never get back. I hope that Elecraft does not go down > this path but agree absolutely that, these days, good searchable PDFs make > life much easier. One thing that is always useful is the update register > (already often used) and text markers indicating changes from the previous > edition (often vertical bars at affected paragraphs). > > On the subject of the KPA1500 manual, I have much appreciated the > additions to the original document but would like to see the block diagram > expanded to make it more useful in terms of appreciating the amplifier > topology and the relation to connectors, etc. For example, the current > very terse diagram does not show the pre-distortion coupler or its location > and, if you hadn't had a spectrum analyser on the amplifier, you might not > appreciate that it's not a direct output coupler. Of course, I'd like to > see the whole schematic but I understand that it must be a tricky > commercial IP balancing act with a new product. > > 73, Peter (VK6HP). > > > -----Original Message----- > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net > On Behalf Of K8TE > Sent: Tuesday, 9 April 2019 2:34 AM > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] new KPA1500 Manual > > Right on! First, I have over two decades of experience with replacing > printed pages in Air Force Technical Orders. What a PITA, but necessary. > Today, those are distributed electronically and printed locally. Often, > it's not possible to make a change that affects only one page since the > change, often an addition, pushes information on to the next page. > > Thanks to Elecraft (not all manufactures do this), we can annotate the PDF > versions with the latest firmware notes, ideas from this reflector, our > just our own pointers. The PDF then becomes a current, searchable document > of great value! > > As I point out in my ham radio presentations, it's 2019. We do a lot of > things with computers now. Join the 21st century. The technology has > certain advantages, especially if you back-up your data. > > 73, Bill, K8TE > > > > -- > Sent from: > http://secure-web.cisco.com/1ly5jG_z3c_ghFK4l_kVBFZrlCKkrMidJYBdwHxcCu3z2lgrmQrao4hnCsJiXrJi0GQVeY5htK-Vh4dQ16ZnFIQU-gBLNh6WwLOG-Pobdsz2l7JPiP-RZfnKzhbShygqpsgyBIbiKZoHEfIG4ZavEgPnhBX124hZDghSJKQTxsh71sJ6EZ8YRh8rxDE9XfyHRiHT1L5tI6UEq-mq43tNLo37ylKZzIGeqbUGidwyuqwiWd1g7He9T7MuWFpLGW7trTaVoSyd23L_IO-4AvaRTaCrYHBtYK-f3Dd90aPLnsyuR2wQXsnHXTnSeOEwNLKL_ye1IsOk-ulrUpbgI-5U5sJjsDXugiwFsOWxQkuI2QHT-wWKA5XNhToEUZtd0r8JnXq9o51L1kiPSFnmlgDqW3ENGmGd2FtGAxrU9UQjmeBWXpyBYm0pkl0WpvaFfGiPUzqDdhKwKLQYBg7WAcp2GLQ-XHIYS_hNpcS5M5NIHPEQ/http%3A%2F%2Felecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com%2F > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: > http://secure-web.cisco.com/15Xu-tgWxGQXmtH17CkIuIwXVaL8qUYmdndVBK0xxyOmLymTGEAlA0Geea95i-no3tp_bPZBNggdFpXObVRtLe8WhkU5sWwCdt_anhUUszZE-jSAupHNd-5ONp_8CsgKAsSi2lpvNlqKZTbBSEHth92SLHqbEnyh6LClTOebVR9BiExmqTX_3W6qp1c9jnYlzmvX8X97TQUoo7mRBhoJ--dww3ybGz4fahocE3zYjz-RKP8XOF2qLAib_1H88L6vSMdLB8-gYJllrGE2m2pkekZK4oEI1CKRCrIVw9a2XFUQFUWmql3AvsNRAFMpqS_-DDVQrU9IZY9Jye6sHW-KP_Vw0N7lP0gQ6MkZxNe_cQvM1fF5s9wANN2NHXVYLcoaJUTYK6jgU1FH0DCOKMcEaF5YlXYRJZmjZybu5xMReoHxVeF80cgdW2zypuzn2OnK60AasxTi8gdRTZCiYNYGGEzTpa7XYQH7_aJSrblWPS4g/http%3A%2F%2Fmailman.qth.net%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Felecraft > Help: > http://secure-web.cisco.com/1cujNAln9yePUe_hD0GtSsEil37DEFfqz1ns3hNMNkkhEfxMRkZE2DNaxChG6wEdLZJbhxrLIlkdsZYL9emd6163d3yNdvVZhkXk0Q2LsFq3s3Ma4FK6zKipikd13Nof-UTrDYfU53JFlk2t1UzU6qEl4s5j_XKABA96zXVw3ZMMbUTPdeB1FY4AQqoxdeZsYljmDI-wDQseFKrnJCw-Pk3qw4KyrAgHlmK5YTH3kAI-7dCa4N7-AL4CicYbxwz4B-xNZ4vp8l-vLCQVtyi3ZENhYM2evZFpFZtTr6mVq5gtXU0RTrRACavcnHgAVO46lv9gByBE8tmpigzySKG8DjNzZB5spxNq06Q4wviQAKexbSLh5XgvMZcfUcN7XP-o-V4EA_-IPjfVd_9FdUo2Ltjx_xULVvYFnHMPFbrulBZXGKroEol3MyIECvXreKRt1__8XKifMQRxo2VIYLHqND_vSMfJ95nQo5IHDbkoqVRA/http%3A%2F%2Fmailman.qth.net%2Fmmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > From lists at subich.com Tue Apr 9 07:57:28 2019 From: lists at subich.com (Joe Subich, W4TV) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 07:57:28 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Using a K3 to route antenna signals to external devices... In-Reply-To: <1554806935784-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> <9d67a871-2c34-ab98-43df-cd558d97fc0b@embarqmail.com> <1554806935784-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <23a7f643-51bf-4ccd-1963-c86bf6aa26e5@subich.com> After the PR6/PR10 to gain the benefit of the PR6/PR10 for the SDR as well as the K3/KRX3 receiver(s). 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2019-04-09 6:48 AM, Sverre Holm (LA3ZA) wrote: > But what if there is a PR6-10 preamp in this path. Where should the > splitter/TEE-adapter be in that case? > >> In brief, it takes a TEE adapter and 2 short pieces of coax. Put the >> adapter between the 2 pieces of coax, and then connect one coax to ANT >> OUT and the other to ANT IN. > > > > ----- > Sverre, LA3ZA > > K2 #2198, K3 #3391, > LA3ZA Blog: http://la3za.blogspot.com, > LA3ZA Unofficial Guide to K2 modifications: http://la3za.blogspot.com/p/la3za-unofficial-guide-to-elecraft-k2.html From a.durbin at msn.com Tue Apr 9 08:21:09 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 12:21:09 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Pushing hard in SSB? Message-ID: "I've pushed my KPA1500 hard in two SSB contests already this year." I seldom connect a microphone so forgive my ignorance. How is is possible to push an amplifier hard in SSB (phone) without exceeding legal limit peak output by a huge margin? I'd understand "pushing hard" in RTTY or other digital modes but not SSB (phone). 73, Andy, k3wyc From svholm54 at gmail.com Tue Apr 9 08:42:54 2019 From: svholm54 at gmail.com (Sverre Holm (LA3ZA)) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 05:42:54 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Using a K3 to route antenna signals to external devices... In-Reply-To: <23a7f643-51bf-4ccd-1963-c86bf6aa26e5@subich.com> References: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> <9d67a871-2c34-ab98-43df-cd558d97fc0b@embarqmail.com> <1554806935784-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <23a7f643-51bf-4ccd-1963-c86bf6aa26e5@subich.com> Message-ID: <1554813774610-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Thanks, Joe. Works nicely and saved me the cost of something like the MFJ-1708B-SDR SDR RF sensing T/R switch! ----- Sverre, LA3ZA K2 #2198, K3 #3391, LA3ZA Blog: http://la3za.blogspot.com, LA3ZA Unofficial Guide to K2 modifications: http://la3za.blogspot.com/p/la3za-unofficial-guide-to-elecraft-k2.html -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From donwilh at embarqmail.com Tue Apr 9 09:28:17 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Using a K3 to route antenna signals to external devices... In-Reply-To: <1554806935784-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> <9d67a871-2c34-ab98-43df-cd558d97fc0b@embarqmail.com> <1554806935784-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1a8a59f9-f240-eefc-64b8-110d0d5b5a5b@embarqmail.com> Sverre, That answer depends --- If you want to connect the SDR directly to the antenna, put the TEE between the ANT OUT and the preamp. OTOH, if you want to have the preamp in-line for the SDR input, put the TEE between the preamp output and the ANT IN connector. If you chose to use the preamp with the SDR, you may have to do some work on the powering and activation of the preamp. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/9/2019 6:48 AM, Sverre Holm (LA3ZA) wrote: > But what if there is a PR6-10 preamp in this path. Where should the > splitter/TEE-adapter be in that case? > >> In brief, it takes a TEE adapter and 2 short pieces of coax. Put the >> adapter between the 2 pieces of coax, and then connect one coax to ANT >> OUT and the other to ANT IN. > > From donwilh at embarqmail.com Tue Apr 9 09:42:16 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 09:42:16 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Request - KXPD2, KXPD1 and KXB3080 In-Reply-To: <5CAC62C2.9070308@g7idb.uk> References: <5CAC62C2.9070308@g7idb.uk> Message-ID: David, Elecraft has the KXPD2, and at last check also has the KXB3080 kit. So the option that is not available is the KXPD1. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/9/2019 5:15 AM, David Cripps wrote: > Hi > Although I've been a ham for nearly 30 years, I've been out the hobby > for the last 25 of them and am now learning Morse again to get into QRP. > > I have recently bought a KX1 and KX2 and would like to get the paddles > for them, so if anybody has a KXPD2 or KXPD1 for sale please let me know > (I'm in the UK if that makes any difference). > > The KX1 has the ATU but only 40M and 20M, so again if you have a KXB3080 > for sale, let me know. > From svholm54 at gmail.com Tue Apr 9 10:09:47 2019 From: svholm54 at gmail.com (Sverre Holm (LA3ZA)) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 07:09:47 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] K3: Using a K3 to route antenna signals to external devices... In-Reply-To: <1a8a59f9-f240-eefc-64b8-110d0d5b5a5b@embarqmail.com> References: <57614551-d16f-833e-9b20-b8d574f1fa97@nk7z.net> <9d67a871-2c34-ab98-43df-cd558d97fc0b@embarqmail.com> <1554806935784-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <1a8a59f9-f240-eefc-64b8-110d0d5b5a5b@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <1554818987011-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Doug, Yes, thanks, you're right. I have the preamp set up to be active for the higher bands 12, 10, and 6 m, and in the bypass position otherwise. I use this to connect an old shortwave receiver (not an SDR) to my main antenna, so I guess it doesn't hurt for it with the extra gain. But I'll try both configurations, both before and after the preamp. ----- Sverre, LA3ZA K2 #2198, K3 #3391, LA3ZA Blog: http://la3za.blogspot.com, LA3ZA Unofficial Guide to K2 modifications: http://la3za.blogspot.com/p/la3za-unofficial-guide-to-elecraft-k2.html -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From eric.csuf at gmail.com Tue Apr 9 10:41:09 2019 From: eric.csuf at gmail.com (EricJ) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 07:41:09 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Technical question on keying of an SDR radio In-Reply-To: <259eddab-d4d2-15e0-0802-4fa4e2d33ad7@gmail.com> References: <9B387C03-9EBA-4031-895D-36BBF909CD83@elecraft.com> <259eddab-d4d2-15e0-0802-4fa4e2d33ad7@gmail.com> Message-ID: Not to worry, Victor. The really important part of generating and demodulating CW happens in your head. Eric KE6US On 4/9/2019 3:08 AM, Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP wrote: > Oh no! NOW you tell me that all these years that I have believed that > I have been operating CW, it's really SSB! > > (Disclaimer to avoid the otherwise inevitable explanations that a pure > audio tone transmitted via SSB is identical with CW: I know that). > > 73, > Victor, 4X6GP > Rehovot, Israel > Formerly K2VCO > CWops no. 5 > http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ > From n1rm at arrl.net Tue Apr 9 11:58:43 2019 From: n1rm at arrl.net (Rick Miller - N1RM) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 08:58:43 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] [K3] PS0 enhancement request Message-ID: <1554825523406-0.post@n2.nabble.com> It looks like the PS0 power off command still has the note about leaving the Power On pin on the accessory connector grounded for at least 100ms to ensure that no internal data is corrupted on the processor. I'm wondering how hard it would be for the PS0 command to coordinate that shutdown sequence without the need to manipulate the power on pin. It sure would make remote control much less cumbersome. Rick N1RM -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From k6dgw at foothill.net Tue Apr 9 14:16:58 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 11:16:58 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Technical question on keying of an SDR radio In-Reply-To: <259eddab-d4d2-15e0-0802-4fa4e2d33ad7@gmail.com> References: <9B387C03-9EBA-4031-895D-36BBF909CD83@elecraft.com> <259eddab-d4d2-15e0-0802-4fa4e2d33ad7@gmail.com> Message-ID: <605cfd49-0f6a-e166-0ce6-4c0ac566fbc9@foothill.net> A technique pioneered by Art Collins many years ago in the KWM2 and S-line. 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/9/2019 3:08 AM, Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP wrote: > Oh no! NOW you tell me that all these years that I have believed that > I have been operating CW, it's really SSB! > > (Disclaimer to avoid the otherwise inevitable explanations that a pure > audio tone transmitted via SSB is identical with CW: I know that). > > 73, > Victor, 4X6GP > Rehovot, Israel From k6dgw at foothill.net Tue Apr 9 14:44:14 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 11:44:14 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] new KPA1500 Manual In-Reply-To: References: <5C9D3B96.7030700@roadrunner.com> <20190329153223.3E4F0149B25E@mailman.qth.net> <1554748464921-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Yes, the USAF Technical Orders for a system could fill a bookcase if printed, and they were printed then.? I don't remember many of the volumes but the -1 was "How to fly the airplane" [or operate the radio], -6 was the Illustrated Parts Breakdown, I think -5 was the parts list.? There was usually a volume describing packaging for shipment of the myriad of modules in the system, and maybe one for storage requirements of various parts.? The well-worn joke was, "When the weight of the paper equals the weight of the airplane, you're cleared for takeoff." And, updates, in the form of page changes, could have life/death consequences if not done.? [see Boeing] However ... tech data for a ham transceiver is light years removed from that environment and comparison really isn't fair or sensible.? Elecraft's manual, like all manufacturers', approaches the radio from the perspective of, "Here are all the controls and here's what they do."? There's some information about how the radio works, but it's not anywhere near exhaustive.? KE7X's books approach it from the perspective of "Here are the things you may want to do with your radio, and here's how to do them."? Again, there's information about what's inside and how it does it, but it's not exhaustive.? No ham manufacturer that I know of publishes page changes. Most of what I write in my station notebook is stuff I've learned about my radios ... how to set up RTTY, how to switch from local to remote operation, anomalies such as the P3 span issue when changing bands via SW commands, TX/RX EQ and AGC settings, etc. It's not info Elecraft sends out.? I annotate the PDF manual with the volume/page in my notebook where the item is described.? For me at least, the Elecraft PDF, KE7X spiral-bound book, and notes in my notebook work fine.? I would have liked a printed spiral-bound K3 manual that lays flat on the desk, but the PDF works. 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/9/2019 4:46 AM, Bill Mader wrote: > I agree with your comments on the amplifier's manual Peter. Getting tech > data right is a challenge. I spent my last six years in the USAF at a > Major Command HQ where I would visit our primary depot twice a year to > discuss product improvement. Tech data was a key part of those meetings. > From rmcgraw at blomand.net Tue Apr 9 14:48:50 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:48:50 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Technical question on keying of an SDR radio In-Reply-To: <605cfd49-0f6a-e166-0ce6-4c0ac566fbc9@foothill.net> References: <9B387C03-9EBA-4031-895D-36BBF909CD83@elecraft.com> <259eddab-d4d2-15e0-0802-4fa4e2d33ad7@gmail.com> <605cfd49-0f6a-e166-0ce6-4c0ac566fbc9@foothill.net> Message-ID: <06259fa5-90eb-504e-6767-7d8d02518eda@blomand.net> And? some of today's software applications {HRD}? have provision for MCW.? One must be careful how the interface between the computer and radio is constructed so as not to have anything in the audio path which would contribute to less than a pure sinewave signal.??? Actually this is exactly how AFSK and other data modes work.? A tone frequency is sent to the radio to produce the MARK signal and a different frequency tone is sent to produce a SPACE signal. In all cases,? a clean signal path between the computer and the radio is found to be mandatory. ? Hum, buzz, clicks, pops and a mike left open are all a NO NO! 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/9/2019 1:16 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: > A technique pioneered by Art Collins many years ago in the KWM2 and > S-line. > > 73, > Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW > Sparks NV DM09dn > Washoe County > > On 4/9/2019 3:08 AM, Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP wrote: >> Oh no! NOW you tell me that all these years that I have believed that >> I have been operating CW, it's really SSB! >> >> (Disclaimer to avoid the otherwise inevitable explanations that a >> pure audio tone transmitted via SSB is identical with CW: I know that). >> >> 73, >> Victor, 4X6GP >> Rehovot, Israel > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From alorona at sbcglobal.net Tue Apr 9 15:42:48 2019 From: alorona at sbcglobal.net (Al Lorona) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:42:48 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> There's always a lot of discussion about measuring SWR, low SWR values, SWR lights not lighting up, etc. Here's something that might give you a better 'feel' for SWR. Imagine that you measure your forward power at 100 W and your reflected power at only 1 W. You'd probably be very happy about this. Congratulations, your SWR would be 1.22 to 1. Pause for a moment and let it soak in that an SWR of 1.22 is fabulously good. Once you get to this point, below which we're dealing with reflected power that's less than 1% of your power, or four-hundredths of a dB, it's not worth doing any more to your antenna system to improve it. No trimming, cutting, raising, lowering, hanging stuff from it, adding remote tuned things, nothing. You're done for the day and can now get on the air! If the reflected power were 4 W, which would still look pretty small on the meter, the SWR would be 1.5 to 1. A lot of people might be bothered by an SWR of 1.5, but really this is still very good and it's probably not worth going back up to the antenna to mess with it any more. Most importantly, the station on the other end cannot possibly hear the difference between your 1.2 and 1.5. At this point you may be saying, "Yeah, but my rig/amplifier/other thing isn't happy unless the SWR is below 1.5 to 1, so I would still have to do more work." Okay, that's fine, but my point is that the absolute number 1.5 nonetheless represents a system that is working quite well. Let's allow the reflected power to increase all the way to 10 watts! At that point, your SWR would be about 2 to 1. Sounds pretty bad, but surely if you were stranded in the desert and had to use your KX3 and a wire to get help, you'd be happy to have a match this good. Now, let's look at a certain type of SWR meter found in virtually every HF rig out there that uses a directional bridge, a diode as a half-wave rectifier, a filter capacitor, a resistor, and a readout of some kind - analog meter, digital display, or other. These types of SWR meters are very common. There's one in the K2 (it's actually in the KPA100), one in the K3, and probably every other rig out there. And those Birds, MFJs and Daiwas have them, too. This type of circuit turns RF voltage into a DC current, usually using either a germanium or Schottky diode, because these diodes have the best sensitivity due to their low forward voltage drops: 0.3 V for the germanium, and 0.4 V for the Schottky. Let's say that our directional bridge, when 100 W is in the forward direction, delivers 10 V to the forward Schottky diode. In our example above of 1 watt reflected, the reflected diode would see 1.0 volts from the reflected port of the bridge. Since this is above the diode threshold voltage, the diode would be happy and operating in its linear region where we'd get about 1 volt out for 1 volt in. The meter would correctly read 1.22 to 1. Now say you have your Elecraft rig set for TUN PWR = 10 W, so when you tune up, forward power is 10 watts, and if the SWR is the aforementioned 1.2 to 1, the forward power would produce a little more than 3 volts at the diode and the 0.1 watts reflected would produce about 0.3 volts. Here is where we run into trouble. Since a Schottky diode doesn't fully conduct until we exceed its 0.4 volt threshold, expecting to get 0.3 V out for 0.3 V in isn't quite realistic. The diode's output voltage won't be zero, but it'll be smaller than expected, according to the nonlinear region around its "knee". I measured a Schottky diode and got about 0.09 V at that level. The meter would indicate an SWR of... 1.06 instead of the actual 1.22. This reading is false. There are some things that can be done to the circuit to compensate for this error but I'm not sure how many rigs go through the trouble. Suffice it to say that measurement of very low SWR has a large amount of uncertainty because the detectors get more and more nonlinear as the thing they're trying to measure (reflected power) gets smaller and smaller. Due to this effect (and also due to directivity) every meter of this kind has a point below which SWR measurements are probably wrong. When we see posts here by folks puzzled as to why low SWR measurements from two different instruments don't agree, this undoubtedly is one of the reasons. I chose these scenarios deviously, to illustrate a kind of corner case, but I think you get the idea that errors always exist in any power measurement like SWR. You might say, "But my SuperDuper wattmeter is calibrated by aliens in a metrology lab deep inside a secret mountain in Nevada and I would bet my life on it." Great, cool, congratulations. But I'm afraid every last power meter has errors stemming from mismatch, directivity, nonlinearity and drift. If you simply tune for minimum reflected power you should be good to go, and don't get too hung up on if the meter says "1.2" or "1.5" or "1.0". Remember, once you get down into this zone it's very likely good enough. Al? W6LX From w4kx at mac.com Tue Apr 9 15:56:55 2019 From: w4kx at mac.com (Tom Doligalski) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 15:56:55 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] new KPA1500 Manual In-Reply-To: References: <5C9D3B96.7030700@roadrunner.com> <20190329153223.3E4F0149B25E@mailman.qth.net> <1554748464921-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <0CCA9827-83D1-4578-B624-A76025C0DCB0@mac.com> Fred: If you take a manual on a thumb drive, Staples can print it and spiral-bound it. Tom W4KX Sent from my iPad > On Apr 9, 2019, at 2:44 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: > > Yes, the USAF Technical Orders for a system could fill a bookcase if printed, and they were printed then. I don't remember many of the volumes but the -1 was "How to fly the airplane" [or operate the radio], -6 was the Illustrated Parts Breakdown, I think -5 was the parts list. There was usually a volume describing packaging for shipment of the myriad of modules in the system, and maybe one for storage requirements of various parts. The well-worn joke was, "When the weight of the paper equals the weight of the airplane, you're cleared for takeoff." And, updates, in the form of page changes, could have life/death consequences if not done. [see Boeing] > > However ... tech data for a ham transceiver is light years removed from that environment and comparison really isn't fair or sensible. Elecraft's manual, like all manufacturers', approaches the radio from the perspective of, "Here are all the controls and here's what they do." There's some information about how the radio works, but it's not anywhere near exhaustive. KE7X's books approach it from the perspective of "Here are the things you may want to do with your radio, and here's how to do them." Again, there's information about what's inside and how it does it, but it's not exhaustive. No ham manufacturer that I know of publishes page changes. > > Most of what I write in my station notebook is stuff I've learned about my radios ... how to set up RTTY, how to switch from local to remote operation, anomalies such as the P3 span issue when changing bands via SW commands, TX/RX EQ and AGC settings, etc. It's not info Elecraft sends out. I annotate the PDF manual with the volume/page in my notebook where the item is described. For me at least, the Elecraft PDF, KE7X spiral-bound book, and notes in my notebook work fine. I would have liked a printed spiral-bound K3 manual that lays flat on the desk, but the PDF works. > > 73, > Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW > Sparks NV DM09dn > Washoe County > >> On 4/9/2019 4:46 AM, Bill Mader wrote: >> I agree with your comments on the amplifier's manual Peter. Getting tech >> data right is a challenge. I spent my last six years in the USAF at a >> Major Command HQ where I would visit our primary depot twice a year to >> discuss product improvement. Tech data was a key part of those meetings. >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From joanpatrie at me.com Tue Apr 9 16:34:06 2019 From: joanpatrie at me.com (Joan) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:34:06 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] My "MFJ Posting" Message-ID: <3CE37818-06D1-401C-9D2E-A4ACF6782951@me.com> Thank you, Jim N4ST, for expressing something which I had become afraid to (having been stung by wasps too many times) 73, Joan KX2CW Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra, said Piglet. Shaka, when the walls fell, said Pooh. > On Apr 8, 2019, at 10:41, Jim - N4ST wrote: > > Ken, > > The Internet has created a mob of hyper-sensitive hype-critical keyboard > warriors. > Any comment, including this one is likely to bring on the slings and arrows. > > With respect to ham gear, yes, roughly speaking you get what you pay for, > but sometimes marginal performance is much better than no performance. > Most of the MFJ stuff I have purchased has served the purpose, especially in > my younger years when more expensive alternatives were out of reach. > I also drive Fords & Chevys and not Range Rovers and Mercedes. > > ___________ > 73, > Jim - N4ST > > -----Original Message----- > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On > Behalf Of Ken G Kopp > Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 08:16 > To: Elecraft > Subject: [Elecraft] My "MFJ Posting" > > I am dismayed at the view some took of my posting. I intended absolutely no > racial or eletist content ... in any way ... and apologize to anyone who > read it that way. > > 73 ! > > Ken Kopp - K0PP > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > From jackbrindle at me.com Tue Apr 9 16:39:36 2019 From: jackbrindle at me.com (Jack Brindle) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:39:36 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <23F99F1E-83AA-4DAB-8577-07D1C335A78C@me.com> My friend Al has described some interesting things about SWR measurement here. But not all power/swr meters behave this way. In fact the Elecraft W2 meter is in this class. The designer added an ingenious little circuit to the diodes to bias them into their linear region. What the smeans is that even at low power the W2 is giving accurate measurements not just of reflected power, but for forward power as well. this is important since the effect that Al describes is valid not just for reflected power, but also forward power at low levels. There is one other things to watch for that actually negates Al?s suggestion to always tune for lowest reflected power. As an ATU tunes, it provides different loads to the driver. This will greatly affect not just the reflected power, but forward power measurements as well, to the point that we may measure very low reflected power, but the forward power is very low as well. Thus when we tune we really do look for both maximum forward power in conjunction with minimum reflected power. One last point. The directional coupler measurements in the KPA500, KAT500 and KPA1500 are designed to handle large power levels since the devices are meant for high power. We don?t really try to be accurate at low levels. Indeed the KPA500 won?t even indicate power below 25 watts and the KAT500 needs something like 10 or 20 watts to work properly. This allows us to be accurate at high power levels and also avoid having to be concerned with the diodes workin in their non-linear mode. In other words, on these products you can pretty much believe the power levels the device is showing when it is showing them. Al, thanks for a nice write-up. 73! Jack, W6FB > On Apr 9, 2019, at 12:42 PM, Al Lorona wrote: > > There's always a lot of discussion about measuring SWR, low SWR values, SWR lights not lighting up, etc. Here's something that might give you a better 'feel' for SWR. > > Imagine that you measure your forward power at 100 W and your reflected power at only 1 W. You'd probably be very happy about this. Congratulations, your SWR would be 1.22 to 1. > > Pause for a moment and let it soak in that an SWR of 1.22 is fabulously good. Once you get to this point, below which we're dealing with reflected power that's less than 1% of your power, or four-hundredths of a dB, it's not worth doing any more to your antenna system to improve it. No trimming, cutting, raising, lowering, hanging stuff from it, adding remote tuned things, nothing. You're done for the day and can now get on the air! > > If the reflected power were 4 W, which would still look pretty small on the meter, the SWR would be 1.5 to 1. > > A lot of people might be bothered by an SWR of 1.5, but really this is still very good and it's probably not worth going back up to the antenna to mess with it any more. Most importantly, the station on the other end cannot possibly hear the difference between your 1.2 and 1.5. > > At this point you may be saying, "Yeah, but my rig/amplifier/other thing isn't happy unless the SWR is below 1.5 to 1, so I would still have to do more work." > > Okay, that's fine, but my point is that the absolute number 1.5 nonetheless represents a system that is working quite well. > > Let's allow the reflected power to increase all the way to 10 watts! At that point, your SWR would be about 2 to 1. Sounds pretty bad, but surely if you were stranded in the desert and had to use your KX3 and a wire to get help, you'd be happy to have a match this good. > > Now, let's look at a certain type of SWR meter found in virtually every HF rig out there that uses a directional bridge, a diode as a half-wave rectifier, a filter capacitor, a resistor, and a readout of some kind - analog meter, digital display, or other. > > These types of SWR meters are very common. There's one in the K2 (it's actually in the KPA100), one in the K3, and probably every other rig out there. And those Birds, MFJs and Daiwas have them, too. > > This type of circuit turns RF voltage into a DC current, usually using either a germanium or Schottky diode, because these diodes have the best sensitivity due to their low forward voltage drops: 0.3 V for the germanium, and 0.4 V for the Schottky. > > Let's say that our directional bridge, when 100 W is in the forward direction, delivers 10 V to the forward Schottky diode. In our example above of 1 watt reflected, the reflected diode would see 1.0 volts from the reflected port of the bridge. Since this is above the diode threshold voltage, the diode would be happy and operating in its linear region where we'd get about 1 volt out for 1 volt in. The meter would correctly read 1.22 to 1. > > Now say you have your Elecraft rig set for TUN PWR = 10 W, so when you tune up, forward power is 10 watts, and if the SWR is the aforementioned 1.2 to 1, the forward power would produce a little more than 3 volts at the diode and the 0.1 watts reflected would produce about 0.3 volts. Here is where we run into trouble. > > Since a Schottky diode doesn't fully conduct until we exceed its 0.4 volt threshold, expecting to get 0.3 V out for 0.3 V in isn't quite realistic. The diode's output voltage won't be zero, but it'll be smaller than expected, according to the nonlinear region around its "knee". I measured a Schottky diode and got about 0.09 V at that level. The meter would indicate an SWR of... 1.06 instead of the actual 1.22. This reading is false. > > There are some things that can be done to the circuit to compensate for this error but I'm not sure how many rigs go through the trouble. Suffice it to say that measurement of very low SWR has a large amount of uncertainty because the detectors get more and more nonlinear as the thing they're trying to measure (reflected power) gets smaller and smaller. Due to this effect (and also due to directivity) every meter of this kind has a point below which SWR measurements are probably wrong. > > When we see posts here by folks puzzled as to why low SWR measurements from two different instruments don't agree, this undoubtedly is one of the reasons. > > I chose these scenarios deviously, to illustrate a kind of corner case, but I think you get the idea that errors always exist in any power measurement like SWR. You might say, "But my SuperDuper wattmeter is calibrated by aliens in a metrology lab deep inside a secret mountain in Nevada and I would bet my life on it." Great, cool, congratulations. But I'm afraid every last power meter has errors stemming from mismatch, directivity, nonlinearity and drift. > > If you simply tune for minimum reflected power you should be good to go, and don't get too hung up on if the meter says "1.2" or "1.5" or "1.0". Remember, once you get down into this zone it's very likely good enough. > > Al W6LX > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rmcgraw at blomand.net Tue Apr 9 16:40:59 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 15:40:59 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <87a9aa61-bce8-0d02-7b13-387495b32d85@blomand.net> Thank you Al Lorona! 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/9/2019 2:42 PM, Al Lorona wrote: > There's always a lot of discussion about measuring SWR, low SWR values, SWR lights not lighting up, etc. Here's something that might give you a better 'feel' for SWR. > > Imagine that you measure your forward power at 100 W and your reflected power at only 1 W. You'd probably be very happy about this. Congratulations, your SWR would be 1.22 to 1. > > Pause for a moment and let it soak in that an SWR of 1.22 is fabulously good. Once you get to this point, below which we're dealing with reflected power that's less than 1% of your power, or four-hundredths of a dB, it's not worth doing any more to your antenna system to improve it. No trimming, cutting, raising, lowering, hanging stuff from it, adding remote tuned things, nothing. You're done for the day and can now get on the air! > > If the reflected power were 4 W, which would still look pretty small on the meter, the SWR would be 1.5 to 1. > > A lot of people might be bothered by an SWR of 1.5, but really this is still very good and it's probably not worth going back up to the antenna to mess with it any more. Most importantly, the station on the other end cannot possibly hear the difference between your 1.2 and 1.5. > > At this point you may be saying, "Yeah, but my rig/amplifier/other thing isn't happy unless the SWR is below 1.5 to 1, so I would still have to do more work." > > Okay, that's fine, but my point is that the absolute number 1.5 nonetheless represents a system that is working quite well. > > Let's allow the reflected power to increase all the way to 10 watts! At that point, your SWR would be about 2 to 1. Sounds pretty bad, but surely if you were stranded in the desert and had to use your KX3 and a wire to get help, you'd be happy to have a match this good. > > Now, let's look at a certain type of SWR meter found in virtually every HF rig out there that uses a directional bridge, a diode as a half-wave rectifier, a filter capacitor, a resistor, and a readout of some kind - analog meter, digital display, or other. > > These types of SWR meters are very common. There's one in the K2 (it's actually in the KPA100), one in the K3, and probably every other rig out there. And those Birds, MFJs and Daiwas have them, too. > > This type of circuit turns RF voltage into a DC current, usually using either a germanium or Schottky diode, because these diodes have the best sensitivity due to their low forward voltage drops: 0.3 V for the germanium, and 0.4 V for the Schottky. > > Let's say that our directional bridge, when 100 W is in the forward direction, delivers 10 V to the forward Schottky diode. In our example above of 1 watt reflected, the reflected diode would see 1.0 volts from the reflected port of the bridge. Since this is above the diode threshold voltage, the diode would be happy and operating in its linear region where we'd get about 1 volt out for 1 volt in. The meter would correctly read 1.22 to 1. > > Now say you have your Elecraft rig set for TUN PWR = 10 W, so when you tune up, forward power is 10 watts, and if the SWR is the aforementioned 1.2 to 1, the forward power would produce a little more than 3 volts at the diode and the 0.1 watts reflected would produce about 0.3 volts. Here is where we run into trouble. > > Since a Schottky diode doesn't fully conduct until we exceed its 0.4 volt threshold, expecting to get 0.3 V out for 0.3 V in isn't quite realistic. The diode's output voltage won't be zero, but it'll be smaller than expected, according to the nonlinear region around its "knee". I measured a Schottky diode and got about 0.09 V at that level. The meter would indicate an SWR of... 1.06 instead of the actual 1.22. This reading is false. > > There are some things that can be done to the circuit to compensate for this error but I'm not sure how many rigs go through the trouble. Suffice it to say that measurement of very low SWR has a large amount of uncertainty because the detectors get more and more nonlinear as the thing they're trying to measure (reflected power) gets smaller and smaller. Due to this effect (and also due to directivity) every meter of this kind has a point below which SWR measurements are probably wrong. > > When we see posts here by folks puzzled as to why low SWR measurements from two different instruments don't agree, this undoubtedly is one of the reasons. > > I chose these scenarios deviously, to illustrate a kind of corner case, but I think you get the idea that errors always exist in any power measurement like SWR. You might say, "But my SuperDuper wattmeter is calibrated by aliens in a metrology lab deep inside a secret mountain in Nevada and I would bet my life on it." Great, cool, congratulations. But I'm afraid every last power meter has errors stemming from mismatch, directivity, nonlinearity and drift. > > If you simply tune for minimum reflected power you should be good to go, and don't get too hung up on if the meter says "1.2" or "1.5" or "1.0". Remember, once you get down into this zone it's very likely good enough. > > Al? W6LX > ______________________________________________________________ From casey at tomochka.com Tue Apr 9 16:54:27 2019 From: casey at tomochka.com (TI2/NA7U) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 13:54:27 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] D13 voltage test high? Message-ID: <1554843267500-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Manual says D13 (banded end) should show between 90-150V, mine measures 178V ... says U4 pin 8 should be between -5 to -25 V, mine measures -30V Still going through the receiver tests, up to the dual-supply tests and all seems well, so should I be concerned about those readings? 73, TI2/NA7U ----- Cloud Warmer Ham Radio Blog -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From donwilh at embarqmail.com Tue Apr 9 16:59:29 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 16:59:29 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] D13 voltage test high? In-Reply-To: <1554843267500-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1554843267500-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <6878a7af-31a3-d296-412e-a8bce29c9db0@embarqmail.com> What is the value of R4? It should be 100k. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/9/2019 4:54 PM, TI2/NA7U wrote: > Manual says D13 (banded end) should show between 90-150V, mine measures 178V > > ... says U4 pin 8 should be between -5 to -25 V, mine measures -30V > > Still going through the receiver tests, up to the dual-supply tests and all > seems well, so should I be concerned about those readings? From n3eta at coastside.net Tue Apr 9 17:03:23 2019 From: n3eta at coastside.net (Ron Genovesi) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:03:23 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <69BD8C30-3133-4565-BF43-36674CD38143@coastside.net> Oh My God! A voice of reason! And from here of all places! How absolutely unexpected! Thank you sir. > On Apr 9, 2019, at 12:42 PM, Al Lorona wrote: > > There's always a lot of discussion about measuring SWR, low SWR values, SWR lights not lighting up, etc. Here's something that might give you a better 'feel' for SWR. > > Imagine that you measure your forward power at 100 W and your reflected power at only 1 W. You'd probably be very happy about this. Congratulations, your SWR would be 1.22 to 1. > > Pause for a moment and let it soak in that an SWR of 1.22 is fabulously good. Once you get to this point, below which we're dealing with reflected power that's less than 1% of your power, or four-hundredths of a dB, it's not worth doing any more to your antenna system to improve it. No trimming, cutting, raising, lowering, hanging stuff from it, adding remote tuned things, nothing. You're done for the day and can now get on the air! > > If the reflected power were 4 W, which would still look pretty small on the meter, the SWR would be 1.5 to 1. > > A lot of people might be bothered by an SWR of 1.5, but really this is still very good and it's probably not worth going back up to the antenna to mess with it any more. Most importantly, the station on the other end cannot possibly hear the difference between your 1.2 and 1.5. > > At this point you may be saying, "Yeah, but my rig/amplifier/other thing isn't happy unless the SWR is below 1.5 to 1, so I would still have to do more work." > > Okay, that's fine, but my point is that the absolute number 1.5 nonetheless represents a system that is working quite well. > > Let's allow the reflected power to increase all the way to 10 watts! At that point, your SWR would be about 2 to 1. Sounds pretty bad, but surely if you were stranded in the desert and had to use your KX3 and a wire to get help, you'd be happy to have a match this good. > > Now, let's look at a certain type of SWR meter found in virtually every HF rig out there that uses a directional bridge, a diode as a half-wave rectifier, a filter capacitor, a resistor, and a readout of some kind - analog meter, digital display, or other. > > These types of SWR meters are very common. There's one in the K2 (it's actually in the KPA100), one in the K3, and probably every other rig out there. And those Birds, MFJs and Daiwas have them, too. > > This type of circuit turns RF voltage into a DC current, usually using either a germanium or Schottky diode, because these diodes have the best sensitivity due to their low forward voltage drops: 0.3 V for the germanium, and 0.4 V for the Schottky. > > Let's say that our directional bridge, when 100 W is in the forward direction, delivers 10 V to the forward Schottky diode. In our example above of 1 watt reflected, the reflected diode would see 1.0 volts from the reflected port of the bridge. Since this is above the diode threshold voltage, the diode would be happy and operating in its linear region where we'd get about 1 volt out for 1 volt in. The meter would correctly read 1.22 to 1. > > Now say you have your Elecraft rig set for TUN PWR = 10 W, so when you tune up, forward power is 10 watts, and if the SWR is the aforementioned 1.2 to 1, the forward power would produce a little more than 3 volts at the diode and the 0.1 watts reflected would produce about 0.3 volts. Here is where we run into trouble. > > Since a Schottky diode doesn't fully conduct until we exceed its 0.4 volt threshold, expecting to get 0.3 V out for 0.3 V in isn't quite realistic. The diode's output voltage won't be zero, but it'll be smaller than expected, according to the nonlinear region around its "knee". I measured a Schottky diode and got about 0.09 V at that level. The meter would indicate an SWR of... 1.06 instead of the actual 1.22. This reading is false. > > There are some things that can be done to the circuit to compensate for this error but I'm not sure how many rigs go through the trouble. Suffice it to say that measurement of very low SWR has a large amount of uncertainty because the detectors get more and more nonlinear as the thing they're trying to measure (reflected power) gets smaller and smaller. Due to this effect (and also due to directivity) every meter of this kind has a point below which SWR measurements are probably wrong. > > When we see posts here by folks puzzled as to why low SWR measurements from two different instruments don't agree, this undoubtedly is one of the reasons. > > I chose these scenarios deviously, to illustrate a kind of corner case, but I think you get the idea that errors always exist in any power measurement like SWR. You might say, "But my SuperDuper wattmeter is calibrated by aliens in a metrology lab deep inside a secret mountain in Nevada and I would bet my life on it." Great, cool, congratulations. But I'm afraid every last power meter has errors stemming from mismatch, directivity, nonlinearity and drift. > > If you simply tune for minimum reflected power you should be good to go, and don't get too hung up on if the meter says "1.2" or "1.5" or "1.0". Remember, once you get down into this zone it's very likely good enough. > > Al W6LX > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From n1rj at roadrunner.com Tue Apr 9 17:39:11 2019 From: n1rj at roadrunner.com (Roger D Johnson) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 17:39:11 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> For an interesting discussion..."What happens to the power that's reflected?" On 4/9/2019 3:42 PM, Al Lorona wrote: > There's always a lot of discussion about measuring SWR, low SWR values, SWR lights not lighting up, etc. Here's something that might give you a better 'feel' for SWR. > > Imagine that you measure your forward power at 100 W and your reflected power at only 1 W. You'd probably be very happy about this. Congratulations, your SWR would be 1.22 to 1. > > Pause for a moment and let it soak in that an SWR of 1.22 is fabulously good. Once you get to this point, below which we're dealing with reflected power that's less than 1% of your power, or four-hundredths of a dB, it's not worth doing any more to your antenna system to improve it. No trimming, cutting, raising, lowering, hanging stuff from it, adding remote tuned things, nothing. You're done for the day and can now get on the air! > > If the reflected power were 4 W, which would still look pretty small on the meter, the SWR would be 1.5 to 1. > > A lot of people might be bothered by an SWR of 1.5, but really this is still very good and it's probably not worth going back up to the antenna to mess with it any more. Most importantly, the station on the other end cannot possibly hear the difference between your 1.2 and 1.5. > > At this point you may be saying, "Yeah, but my rig/amplifier/other thing isn't happy unless the SWR is below 1.5 to 1, so I would still have to do more work." > > Okay, that's fine, but my point is that the absolute number 1.5 nonetheless represents a system that is working quite well. > > Let's allow the reflected power to increase all the way to 10 watts! At that point, your SWR would be about 2 to 1. Sounds pretty bad, but surely if you were stranded in the desert and had to use your KX3 and a wire to get help, you'd be happy to have a match this good. > From k6dgw at foothill.net Tue Apr 9 17:41:34 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 14:41:34 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: <23F99F1E-83AA-4DAB-8577-07D1C335A78C@me.com> References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <23F99F1E-83AA-4DAB-8577-07D1C335A78C@me.com> Message-ID: <6202d008-ddae-670e-8d7c-07cca64635db@foothill.net> Why does everyone seem to think all the secret, hollow mountains are in Nevada?? I know of one in Colorado and another in Virginia.? Umm ... maybe that's in West Virginia, not sure now.? [:-)) 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County >> I chose these scenarios deviously, to illustrate a kind of corner case, but I think you get the idea that errors always exist in any power measurement like SWR. You might say, "But my SuperDuper wattmeter is calibrated by aliens in a metrology lab deep inside a secret mountain in Nevada and I would bet my life on it." Great, cool, congratulations. But I'm afraid every last power meter has errors stemming from mismatch, directivity, nonlinearity and drift. >> >> Al W6LX >> From k6xk at ncn.net Tue Apr 9 18:42:35 2019 From: k6xk at ncn.net (Roy Koeppe) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 17:42:35 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com><316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> Message-ID: "...Let's allow the reflected power to increase all the way to 10 watts! At that point, your SWR would be about 2 to 1. Sounds pretty bad, but surely if you were stranded in the desert and had to use your KX3 and a wire to get help, you'd be happy to have a match this good...(etc.)" >From memory now, at 2 to 1...feedline voltage nodes and current nodes can double -- no small thing when power is 1500 watts; can stress antenna system components. 73, Roy K6XK From numbnutz33 at verizon.net Tue Apr 9 19:11:34 2019 From: numbnutz33 at verizon.net (Steve Forst) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:11:34 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA500 alarm Message-ID: <318f6529-04bb-0708-ea99-8c3fc68fb230@verizon.net> Thanks to Andy and Jack for replies on my question about the alarm on the KPA500. I have a couple of ways to go with this now, and am grateful for the help. 73, Steve KW3A From w4bws1 at gmail.com Tue Apr 9 20:56:59 2019 From: w4bws1 at gmail.com (Don Sanders) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 20:56:59 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> Message-ID: Since no one has answered your question. I will venture a supposition that many know but few will speak out. And some still remember their CB days and the erroneous advertising saying the power is lost. Reflected Power flows back down the feed line and is subjected to the normal feed line loss. It then is "reflected" back toward the antenna, again subject to the feed line loss, where some of it is radiated and some reflected again. This continues until the power is dissipated. The book "Reflections" has a very good but somewhat technical explanation. Therein also is the reference to forgetting about striving for the "Holy Grail" of 1:1 SWR. And concentrating on getting it low enough that the transmitter will supply full power output. Also using the best low loss feed line and proper matching when possible of the feed line to the antenna. Dr. Don W4BWS God Bless All Ham Radio does not make the world go round. Ham Radio is what makes the ride worthwhile. On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 6:43 PM Roy Koeppe wrote: > "...Let's allow the reflected power to increase all the way to 10 > watts! At that point, your SWR would be about 2 to 1. Sounds pretty bad, > but > surely if you were stranded in the desert and had to use your KX3 and a > wire > to get help, you'd be happy to have a match this good...(etc.)" > > > From memory now, at 2 to 1...feedline voltage nodes and current nodes can > double -- no small thing when power is 1500 watts; can stress antenna > system > components. > > 73, Roy K6XK > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From k6dgw at foothill.net Tue Apr 9 22:10:45 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:10:45 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> Message-ID: Well, the reflected power is created by a "virtual transmitter" at the feedpoint of the antenna and heads down the coax which has a surge impedance of Z0 ohms.? It meets the SO-239 at the TX and sees an impedance of Z1, the impedance presented by the PA and output filters.? If Z1=Z0, the power is dissipated as heat in the PA and associated RF circuitry.? If Z1<>Z0, some is dissipated and some is reflected, where some is radiated, and some is reflected [virtual transmitter again].? Ad infinitum, and when forever is over, it is all gone and everyone lives happily ever after. SWR and all the associated measuring equipment and concern with it only became an issue when: 1) Coax replaced parallel lines and; 2) Resonant output circuits were replaced by solid state amplifiers with non-resonant filters.? When I sat for the Extra in early 1956, the only question that involved standing waves was one about how Lecher Lines could be used to measure transmitter frequency. It's important today but calculating it hasn't changed.? At 10 W, a 2:1 SWR will probably work ok.? At 1500 W, a solid state amplifier may not be happy with the voltages developed at its output connector. 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/9/2019 5:56 PM, Don Sanders wrote: > Since no one has answered your question. I will venture a > supposition that many know but few will speak out. > And some still remember their CB days and the erroneous > advertising saying the power is lost. > Reflected Power flows back down the feed line and is subjected > to the normal feed line loss. It then is "reflected" back toward the > antenna, again subject to the feed line loss, where some of it is > radiated and some reflected again. > This continues until the power is dissipated. The book "Reflections" > has a very good but somewhat technical explanation. > Therein also is the reference to forgetting about striving for the > "Holy Grail" of 1:1 SWR. > And concentrating on getting it low enough that the transmitter will > supply full power output. Also using the best low loss feed line and > proper matching when possible of the feed line to the antenna. > > Dr. Don W4BWS > From w2xj at w2xj.net Tue Apr 9 22:21:17 2019 From: w2xj at w2xj.net (W2xj) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 19:21:17 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> Message-ID: <1031208A-47B5-4A90-94A2-74E2DA8B585D@w2xj.net> I agree except that even at 500KW a 2:1 or greater is the norm with open wire line. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 9, 2019, at 19:10, Fred Jensen wrote: > > Well, the reflected power is created by a "virtual transmitter" at the feedpoint of the antenna and heads down the coax which has a surge impedance of Z0 ohms. It meets the SO-239 at the TX and sees an impedance of Z1, the impedance presented by the PA and output filters. If Z1=Z0, the power is dissipated as heat in the PA and associated RF circuitry. If Z1<>Z0, some is dissipated and some is reflected, where some is radiated, and some is reflected [virtual transmitter again]. Ad infinitum, and when forever is over, it is all gone and everyone lives happily ever after. > > SWR and all the associated measuring equipment and concern with it only became an issue when: 1) Coax replaced parallel lines and; 2) Resonant output circuits were replaced by solid state amplifiers with non-resonant filters. When I sat for the Extra in early 1956, the only question that involved standing waves was one about how Lecher Lines could be used to measure transmitter frequency. > > It's important today but calculating it hasn't changed. At 10 W, a 2:1 SWR will probably work ok. At 1500 W, a solid state amplifier may not be happy with the voltages developed at its output connector. > > 73, > Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW > Sparks NV DM09dn > Washoe County > >> On 4/9/2019 5:56 PM, Don Sanders wrote: >> Since no one has answered your question. I will venture a >> supposition that many know but few will speak out. >> And some still remember their CB days and the erroneous >> advertising saying the power is lost. >> Reflected Power flows back down the feed line and is subjected >> to the normal feed line loss. It then is "reflected" back toward the >> antenna, again subject to the feed line loss, where some of it is >> radiated and some reflected again. >> This continues until the power is dissipated. The book "Reflections" >> has a very good but somewhat technical explanation. >> Therein also is the reference to forgetting about striving for the >> "Holy Grail" of 1:1 SWR. >> And concentrating on getting it low enough that the transmitter will >> supply full power output. Also using the best low loss feed line and >> proper matching when possible of the feed line to the antenna. >> >> Dr. Don W4BWS >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From donwilh at embarqmail.com Tue Apr 9 23:06:43 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2019 23:06:43 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> Message-ID: <4461cda5-baa6-e510-ed2b-d96c5b0f7b13@embarqmail.com> For a slightly different answer, take a look at my website www.w3fpr.com article on Antennas, Transmission Lines, and Tuners. You can also find that same article preserved at https://www.qsl.net/w3fpr/ant_article.htm. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/9/2019 8:56 PM, Don Sanders wrote: > Since no one has answered your question. I will venture a > supposition that many know but few will speak out. > And some still remember their CB days and the erroneous > advertising saying the power is lost. > Reflected Power flows back down the feed line and is subjected > to the normal feed line loss. It then is "reflected" back toward the > antenna, again subject to the feed line loss, where some of it is > radiated and some reflected again. > This continues until the power is dissipated. The book "Reflections" > has a very good but somewhat technical explanation. > Therein also is the reference to forgetting about striving for the > "Holy Grail" of 1:1 SWR. > And concentrating on getting it low enough that the transmitter will > supply full power output. Also using the best low loss feed line and > proper matching when possible of the feed line to the antenna. > > Dr. Don W4BWS > > God Bless All > Ham Radio does not make the world go round. > Ham Radio is what makes the ride worthwhile. > > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 6:43 PM Roy Koeppe wrote: > >> "...Let's allow the reflected power to increase all the way to 10 >> watts! At that point, your SWR would be about 2 to 1. Sounds pretty bad, >> but >> surely if you were stranded in the desert and had to use your KX3 and a >> wire >> to get help, you'd be happy to have a match this good...(etc.)" >> >> >> From memory now, at 2 to 1...feedline voltage nodes and current nodes can >> double -- no small thing when power is 1500 watts; can stress antenna >> system >> components. >> >> 73, Roy K6XK >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From carl at n8vz.com Wed Apr 10 09:20:17 2019 From: carl at n8vz.com (=?utf-8?Q?Carl_J=C3=B3n_Denbow?=) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:20:17 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] My "MFJ Posting" In-Reply-To: <3CE37818-06D1-401C-9D2E-A4ACF6782951@me.com> References: <3CE37818-06D1-401C-9D2E-A4ACF6782951@me.com> Message-ID: What gets me is that Ken was not commenting on a race but a culture. He was completely wrong in his assessment of the culture to which the head of MFJ belonged, but that?s another issue. It should not have been implied he was a racist for that comment. An apology is due, IMHO. The word ?racist? is thrown around too frequently today in ways that are on the verge of rendering the word meaningless. At that point real racists take cover under the umbrella thus created by the misuse of the term. That?s very unfortunate, because real racism is hideous and needs to be forcefully countered and confronted everywhere it raises its ugly head. 73, Carl Sent from my iPhone =========================== Carl J?n Denbow, N8VZ 17 Coventry Lane Athens, Ohio 45701-3718 carl at n8vz.com www.n8vz.com EM89wh IRLP 4533 Echolink 116070 PSK and JT65 Forever! =========================== > On Apr 9, 2019, at 4:34 PM, Joan via Elecraft wrote: > > Thank you, Jim N4ST, for expressing something which I had become afraid to (having been stung by wasps too many times) > > 73, > Joan KX2CW > > Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra, said Piglet. > Shaka, when the walls fell, said Pooh. > >> On Apr 8, 2019, at 10:41, Jim - N4ST wrote: >> >> Ken, >> >> The Internet has created a mob of hyper-sensitive hype-critical keyboard >> warriors. >> Any comment, including this one is likely to bring on the slings and arrows. >> >> With respect to ham gear, yes, roughly speaking you get what you pay for, >> but sometimes marginal performance is much better than no performance. >> Most of the MFJ stuff I have purchased has served the purpose, especially in >> my younger years when more expensive alternatives were out of reach. >> I also drive Fords & Chevys and not Range Rovers and Mercedes. >> >> ___________ >> 73, >> Jim - N4ST >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On >> Behalf Of Ken G Kopp >> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 08:16 >> To: Elecraft >> Subject: [Elecraft] My "MFJ Posting" >> >> I am dismayed at the view some took of my posting. I intended absolutely no >> racial or eletist content ... in any way ... and apologize to anyone who >> read it that way. >> >> 73 ! >> >> Ken Kopp - K0PP >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From a.durbin at msn.com Wed Apr 10 09:59:21 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:59:21 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] SWR - does it matter? Message-ID: As a counter to those who are asserting that SWR 1.5:1 is a good enough match for an antenna system I offer measured data for the KPA500. At 14.005 MHz my KPA500, when connected to a 1.44:1 SWR load (R37, X9), had a PA dissipation of over 500 watts when producing 400 watts RF output. When the load was changed to 1.30:1 (R39, X3) the PA dissipation was about 410 watts. When the load was changed to SWR 1.07:1 (R49, X3) the PA dissipation was reduced to under 400 watts. (The plots are far more informative than a text description but I can't post them here). If you don't mind your KPA500 running hot, and are prepared to accept it shutting down with PA DISS fault, then 1.5:1 SWR may be good enough for you. I'd rather know the complex impedance of the antenna system load and avoid loads that result in high PA dissipation. 73, Andy, k3wyc From kwroberson at yahoo.com Wed Apr 10 10:32:28 2019 From: kwroberson at yahoo.com (Ken Roberson) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] SWR - does it matter? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <301992382.700594.1554906748135@mail.yahoo.com> If you want your antenna match to be correct use aScopeMatch as I describe on my 630M web-site. Thanks 73 Ken K5DNL www.k5dnl.com On Wednesday, April 10, 2019, 9:03:48 AM CDT, Andy Durbin wrote: As a counter to those who are asserting that SWR 1.5:1 is a good enough match for an antenna system I offer measured data for the KPA500. At 14.005 MHz my KPA500, when connected to a 1.44:1 SWR load (R37, X9), had a PA dissipation of over 500 watts when producing 400 watts RF output.? When the load was changed to 1.30:1 (R39, X3) the PA dissipation was about 410 watts.? When the load was changed to SWR 1.07:1 (R49, X3) the PA dissipation was reduced to under 400 watts.? (The plots are far more informative than a text description but I can't post them here). If you don't mind your KPA500 running hot, and are prepared to accept it shutting down with PA DISS fault, then 1.5:1 SWR may be good enough for you.? I'd rather know the complex impedance of the antenna system load and avoid loads that result in high PA dissipation. 73, Andy, k3wyc ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From no9e at arrl.net Wed Apr 10 12:13:06 2019 From: no9e at arrl.net (Ignacy) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:13:06 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] SWR - does it matter? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1554912786630-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Assuming that the correct load is 50 Ohms, load with SWR of 1.5:1 could be 33 Ohm or 75 Ohm. Or something more complex. The load of 33 Ohm would cause bigger dissipation and the load of 75 Ohm less dissipation but also less power. Three options here. First, spend hrs/days optimizing your antennas. Second, use antenna tuner. Third, accept inefficiencies. Personally, I would not consider a solid-state amp without a built-in tuner. Ignacy, NO9E -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From kg9hfrank at gmail.com Wed Apr 10 12:45:00 2019 From: kg9hfrank at gmail.com (Frank Krozel) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:45:00 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Vibroplex Code Warrior JR Message-ID: <7F8E5CD0-58DB-405B-A0F3-F8A8ECB9E2D4@gmail.com> Not sure who had the modification for the Vibroplex Code Warrior JR posted but THANKS! I removed the screws holding the paddles in place and replaced them with brass screws and washers (I used nuts as the hardware store did not have brass washers) and I now like the paddle. I also used some nail polish (wifes?) on the bottom to hold them in place as they are ?slightly loose? to give me a good feel. I also noticed I ?had? washers underneath the paddle as well. It has been a frustrating experience with the dits on my Code Warrior JR since new but replacing both screws and adding washers gave me a new paddle. de KG9H From rmcgraw at blomand.net Wed Apr 10 12:30:07 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:30:07 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] SWR - does it matter? In-Reply-To: <1554912786630-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1554912786630-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: And then use the lowest loss feedline one can afford and install. This minimizes the increased loss due to SWR. Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 10, 2019, at 11:13 AM, Ignacy wrote: > > Assuming that the correct load is 50 Ohms, load with SWR of 1.5:1 could be 33 > Ohm or 75 Ohm. Or something more complex. > > The load of 33 Ohm would cause bigger dissipation and the load of 75 Ohm > less dissipation but also less power. > > Three options here. First, spend hrs/days optimizing your antennas. Second, > use antenna tuner. Third, accept inefficiencies. Personally, I would not > consider a solid-state amp without a built-in tuner. > > Ignacy, NO9E > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From forums at david-woolley.me.uk Wed Apr 10 13:13:13 2019 From: forums at david-woolley.me.uk (David Woolley) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 18:13:13 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> Message-ID: A typical transmitter does not reverse terminate the transmission line with its characteristic impedance, so most of the reflected power gets re-reflected as forward power. Reflected power isn't necessarily lost power. At least at lower frequencies, it is likely to present a much higher impedance. A final that did accurately terminate the line would be rather inefficient. A more important issue with SWR is high SWRs can cause clipping (you need a larger voltage swing if the load is higher (assuming purely resistive for the moment), or take it outside the safe operating area of the output devices. Those may cause problems at quite low SWRs, but they actually depend on the complex impedance, so on some parts of the Smith chart circle you may be completely safe, but on others, you might kill the finals. On 09/04/2019 22:39, Roger D Johnson wrote: > For an interesting discussion..."What happens to the power that's > reflected?" From carl at n8vz.com Wed Apr 10 13:20:24 2019 From: carl at n8vz.com (=?utf-8?Q?Carl_J=C3=B3n_Denbow?=) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:20:24 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] My "MFJ Posting" In-Reply-To: <33f40946-bf24-dc26-a37f-2c9d1059bda4@gmail.com> References: <3CE37818-06D1-401C-9D2E-A4ACF6782951@me.com> <33f40946-bf24-dc26-a37f-2c9d1059bda4@gmail.com> Message-ID: <54683F5C-AB5C-4B10-A697-28FC669B4AAD@n8vz.com> Since when did nationality = race? Why do you assume Ken?s comment was based on how Martin looks? He may have never seen a photo of him. I certainly haven?t, that I can recall. His name sounds like it?s Asian. Is his ethnicity Chinese, Japanese, Korean? I have no idea. Ken may have assumed, I gather incorrectly, that he was an immigrant from one of those nations. Each of those nations certainly have different cultures, with different sets of cultural norms. Ken made a very awkward statement. Not one I would make. But, I think branding it as racism is more in the eye of the beholder then the pen of the author. 73 de Carl N8VZ Sent from my iPhone =========================== Carl J?n Denbow, N8VZ 17 Coventry Lane Athens, Ohio 45701-3718 carl at n8vz.com www.n8vz.com EM89wh IRLP 4533 Echolink 116070 PSK and JT65 Forever! =========================== > On Apr 10, 2019, at 11:55 AM, Scott Manthe wrote: > > This is what Ken said: > Perhaps the matter stems from the nationality of MFJ's owner and a > different set of values. > > He doesn't mention "culture" at all. He mentions nationality, but since Martin Jue is an American, born in Mississippi, what is he talking about? Ken is saying that Jue doesn't "look" like an American and has different values because of the way he looks. Isn't that racist? If that's not real racism, then what is? Ken didn't call him a pejorative name, but he did assume the Martin has different values based on the way he looks. Isn't that ugly enough for you? > > 73, > Scott N9AA > >> On 4/10/19 9:20 AM, Carl J?n Denbow wrote: >> What gets me is that Ken was not commenting on a race but a culture. He was completely wrong in his assessment of the culture to which the head of MFJ belonged, but that?s another issue. It should not have been implied he was a racist for that comment. An apology is due, IMHO. The word ?racist? is thrown around too frequently today in ways that are on the verge of rendering the word meaningless. At that point real racists take cover under the umbrella thus created by the misuse of the term. That?s very unfortunate, because real racism is hideous and needs to be forcefully countered and confronted everywhere it raises its ugly head. >> >> 73, >> >> Carl >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> =========================== >> Carl J?n Denbow, N8VZ >> 17 Coventry Lane >> Athens, Ohio 45701-3718 >> >> carl at n8vz.com >> www.n8vz.com >> EM89wh >> >> IRLP 4533 Echolink 116070 >> >> PSK and JT65 Forever! >> =========================== >> >>>> On Apr 9, 2019, at 4:34 PM, Joan via Elecraft wrote: >>>> >>>> Thank you, Jim N4ST, for expressing something which I had become afraid to (having been stung by wasps too many times) >>>> >>>> 73, >>>> Joan KX2CW >>>> >>>> Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra, said Piglet. >>>> Shaka, when the walls fell, said Pooh. >>>> >>>> On Apr 8, 2019, at 10:41, Jim - N4ST wrote: >>>> >>>> Ken, >>>> >>>> The Internet has created a mob of hyper-sensitive hype-critical keyboard >>>> warriors. >>>> Any comment, including this one is likely to bring on the slings and arrows. >>>> >>>> With respect to ham gear, yes, roughly speaking you get what you pay for, >>>> but sometimes marginal performance is much better than no performance. >>>> Most of the MFJ stuff I have purchased has served the purpose, especially in >>>> my younger years when more expensive alternatives were out of reach. >>>> I also drive Fords & Chevys and not Range Rovers and Mercedes. >>>> >>>> ___________ >>>> 73, >>>> Jim - N4ST >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On >>>> Behalf Of Ken G Kopp >>>> Sent: Monday, April 8, 2019 08:16 >>>> To: Elecraft >>>> Subject: [Elecraft] My "MFJ Posting" >>>> >>>> I am dismayed at the view some took of my posting. I intended absolutely no >>>> racial or eletist content ... in any way ... and apologize to anyone who >>>> read it that way. >>>> >>>> 73 ! >>>> >>>> Ken Kopp - K0PP >>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>> >>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From k6dgw at foothill.net Wed Apr 10 13:23:39 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:23:39 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: <1031208A-47B5-4A90-94A2-74E2DA8B585D@w2xj.net> References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> <1031208A-47B5-4A90-94A2-74E2DA8B585D@w2xj.net> Message-ID: <394dfe13-8684-a279-2408-3b276b61fb7b@foothill.net> Or 10:1 or even 20:1.? However ... there's always a "however" or a "but" ... it doesn't matter.? The dielectric constant of air [the insulator between open wire conductors] is very close to 1 whereas it is much larger for various forms of coax.? Very high SWR creates very high voltages along the line.? The energy storage with high dielectric constants is much higher than with air, and dielectric losses go up dramatically.? In prehistoric times when we used vacuum tubes and resonant tank circuits, we coupled power to the line with a 2-3 turn link coil adjacent or in the middle of the resonant tank. If the line exhibited reactance, it detuned the tank which we just retuned to resonance ["Dip the plate, increase the coupling, repeat"].? The PA tank circuit became a thoroughly mis-named "antenna tuner."? It didn't matter what the SWR was on the open wire transmission line, and in fact no one paid any attention to it.? Then flexible coaxial cable was invented.? It was much more convenient than open wire line, however in reasonable physical sizes, it had very low characteristic [surge] impedances ... 50 and 75 ohm impedances were the result and now, SWR mattered.? The dielectric constant inside the cable was very much higher, and the higher voltages from high SWR resulted in much higher dielectric losses. Then, someone invented the Pi-network [for all of you with fingers poised over the keyboard to pounce on my description of history, relax and breath deeply.? I'm making some of the non-technical stuff up to help hold your attention].? The Pi-network would transform the 50 or 75 ohm impedance at the end of the coax to the several thousand ohm plate circuit impedance of the PA stage and power would flow to the antenna unimpeded.? It was at this point that sales of SWR indicators soared, SWR became a household abbreviation in the ham community, and an SWR of 1.000:1 became the Nirvana of ham radio.? It has been thus ever since. As electronics progressed [?] from the vacuous to the solid state, SWR took on an enhanced importance since the solid state was far less tolerant of overvoltage and energy dissipation than the 807's, 813's, and 250TH's of the previous era.? The resonant tank circuit faded, amplifiers now feed non-resonant filter networks and expect to see a 50+j0 ohm load ... or else!? This made open wire transmission lines much more difficult to use, requiring some way to adapt a PL259 to connect them to the radio which is both mechanically and electrically hard, and sparked the incorporation of "SWR Alarms" into our radios.? It also spawned the "balun," a mysterious device that may be of alien origin since no one seems to know exactly what it does or how it does it. I hope this helps. [:-) 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW ex KN6DGW 1953 Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/9/2019 7:21 PM, W2xj wrote: > I agree except that even at 500KW a 2:1 or greater is the norm with open wire line. > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 9, 2019, at 19:10, Fred Jensen wrote: >> >> Well, the reflected power is created by a "virtual transmitter" at the feedpoint of the antenna and heads down the coax which has a surge impedance of Z0 ohms. It meets the SO-239 at the TX and sees an impedance of Z1, the impedance presented by the PA and output filters. If Z1=Z0, the power is dissipated as heat in the PA and associated RF circuitry. If Z1<>Z0, some is dissipated and some is reflected, where some is radiated, and some is reflected [virtual transmitter again]. Ad infinitum, and when forever is over, it is all gone and everyone lives happily ever after. >> >> SWR and all the associated measuring equipment and concern with it only became an issue when: 1) Coax replaced parallel lines and; 2) Resonant output circuits were replaced by solid state amplifiers with non-resonant filters. When I sat for the Extra in early 1956, the only question that involved standing waves was one about how Lecher Lines could be used to measure transmitter frequency. >> >> It's important today but calculating it hasn't changed. At 10 W, a 2:1 SWR will probably work ok. At 1500 W, a solid state amplifier may not be happy with the voltages developed at its output connector. >> >> 73, >> Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW >> Sparks NV DM09dn >> Washoe County >> From eric at elecraft.com Wed Apr 10 13:47:48 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 10:47:48 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] My "MFJ Posting" In-Reply-To: References: <3CE37818-06D1-401C-9D2E-A4ACF6782951@me.com> Message-ID: <2866f2b9-49cc-a066-7d8d-ca19f7c473ab@elecraft.com> Folks - We commented strongly on the post in question and closed this topic several days ago.? Thread is CLOSED. I also posted that discussions criticizing others about race./culture etc. along with posts or direct emails criticizing those who made inappropriate posts are outside of list guidelines. See my earlier post, or email me for a copy if you did not see my earlier posting on our position on the original offensive post and these topics. Also if you you have complaints about any posting please email me as the moderator and I'll address it.? Since I do not always read the list in real time, direct emails work best. 73, Eric Moderator, COO, etc. /elecraft.com/ From rmcgraw at blomand.net Wed Apr 10 14:13:13 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:13:13 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: <394dfe13-8684-a279-2408-3b276b61fb7b@foothill.net> References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> <1031208A-47B5-4A90-94A2-74E2DA8B585D@w2xj.net> <394dfe13-8684-a279-2408-3b276b61fb7b@foothill.net> Message-ID: <7012b836-098f-9ac0-981b-54315315e7da@blomand.net> Hummmm.......see: http://www.dj0ip.de/balun-stuff/ I seem to think this fellow has a good grasp about the "alien origin" of baluns. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/10/2019 12:23 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: > It also spawned the "balun," a mysterious device that may be of alien > origin since no one seems to know exactly what it does or how it does it. From rmcgraw at blomand.net Wed Apr 10 14:23:28 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:23:28 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> Message-ID: And for that reason as Roy stated, those components that are rated "legal limit" are done so under MATCHED conditions.??? Use a legal limit component in a condition where SWR is 2:1 or 3:1 or higher and one is likely to find it becoming a smoke generator at legal limit or even less. Case and point, the KAT500 ATU is rated at 600 watts, 3 - 30 MHz, 5 oh On 4/9/2019 7:56 PM, Don Sanders wrote: > From memory now, at 2 to 1...feedline voltage nodes and current nodes can > double -- no small thing when power is 1500 watts; can stress antenna > system > components. > > 73, Roy K6XK From billamader at gmail.com Wed Apr 10 14:36:44 2019 From: billamader at gmail.com (K8TE) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 11:36:44 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: <6202d008-ddae-670e-8d7c-07cca64635db@foothill.net> References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <23F99F1E-83AA-4DAB-8577-07D1C335A78C@me.com> <6202d008-ddae-670e-8d7c-07cca64635db@foothill.net> Message-ID: <1554921404555-0.post@n2.nabble.com> We have one in NM, however I am not allowed to talk/write about it. No, it has nothing to do with Roswell. 73, Bill, K8TE -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From earobinson at sbcglobal.net Wed Apr 10 14:39:22 2019 From: earobinson at sbcglobal.net (Eugene) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:39:22 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] SWR and Power Output Message-ID: The reason SWR should be of concern is the effect it has on what is presented to the solid state output device(s) in your radio. The output power and final stage current is determined by the load presented by the antenna/tuner and the output matching network. The output power is, P= supply voltage squared divided by 2xR(load). A 2:1 SWR could present a load either half or twice the design load for the 1:1 (50 ohm) SWR match or some where in between those two points with a complex impedance being presented to the output device(s). Thus, the output power delivered by your radio and the final output device current and efficiency is directly related to the "match" presented to your radio by your antenna and/or tuner. Gene, N5LDX Sent from my iPad From k2vco.vic at gmail.com Wed Apr 10 16:16:48 2019 From: k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 23:16:48 +0300 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: <394dfe13-8684-a279-2408-3b276b61fb7b@foothill.net> References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> <1031208A-47B5-4A90-94A2-74E2DA8B585D@w2xj.net> <394dfe13-8684-a279-2408-3b276b61fb7b@foothill.net> Message-ID: <1a331233-1812-7b90-c722-da7f4a676d20@gmail.com> I believe I run the highest SWR of anyone here. It is close to 100:1 in normal operation according to EZNEC (I have never tried to measure it). The line is open-wire line made with no. 12 (2mm) wire, only about 10m long. The highest SWR is on 40 meters, and I calculate the loss as around 1 dB. I calculated the peak voltage at around 7 kV. You know how the specs on vacuum relays have to be derated for RF? Believe them. After using various more or less complicated matching arrangements, I settled on an old Johnson KW Matchbox. It does the job on all bands from 40 through 10m, with just a little external help on 30m. The antenna is a simple rotary dipole whose total length is 10m. 73, Victor, 4X6GP Rehovot, Israel Formerly K2VCO CWops no. 5 http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ On 10/04/2019 20:23, Fred Jensen wrote: > Or 10:1 or even 20:1.? However ... there's always a "however" or a "but" > ... it doesn't matter.? The dielectric constant of air [the insulator > between open wire conductors] is very close to 1 whereas it is much > larger for various forms of coax.? Very high SWR creates very high > voltages along the line.? The energy storage with high dielectric > constants is much higher than with air, and dielectric losses go up > dramatically.? In prehistoric times when we used vacuum tubes and > resonant tank circuits, we coupled power to the line with a 2-3 turn > link coil adjacent or in the middle of the resonant tank. > > If the line exhibited reactance, it detuned the tank which we just > retuned to resonance ["Dip the plate, increase the coupling, repeat"]. > The PA tank circuit became a thoroughly mis-named "antenna tuner."? It > didn't matter what the SWR was on the open wire transmission line, and > in fact no one paid any attention to it.? Then flexible coaxial cable > was invented.? It was much more convenient than open wire line, however > in reasonable physical sizes, it had very low characteristic [surge] > impedances ... 50 and 75 ohm impedances were the result and now, SWR > mattered.? The dielectric constant inside the cable was very much > higher, and the higher voltages from high SWR resulted in much higher > dielectric losses. > > Then, someone invented the Pi-network [for all of you with fingers > poised over the keyboard to pounce on my description of history, relax > and breath deeply.? I'm making some of the non-technical stuff up to > help hold your attention].? The Pi-network would transform the 50 or 75 > ohm impedance at the end of the coax to the several thousand ohm plate > circuit impedance of the PA stage and power would flow to the antenna > unimpeded.? It was at this point that sales of SWR indicators soared, > SWR became a household abbreviation in the ham community, and an SWR of > 1.000:1 became the Nirvana of ham radio.? It has been thus ever since. > > As electronics progressed [?] from the vacuous to the solid state, SWR > took on an enhanced importance since the solid state was far less > tolerant of overvoltage and energy dissipation than the 807's, 813's, > and 250TH's of the previous era.? The resonant tank circuit faded, > amplifiers now feed non-resonant filter networks and expect to see a > 50+j0 ohm load ... or else!? This made open wire transmission lines much > more difficult to use, requiring some way to adapt a PL259 to connect > them to the radio which is both mechanically and electrically hard, and > sparked the incorporation of "SWR Alarms" into our radios.? It also > spawned the "balun," a mysterious device that may be of alien origin > since no one seems to know exactly what it does or how it does it. > > I hope this helps. [:-) > > 73, > Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW > ex KN6DGW 1953 > Sparks NV DM09dn > Washoe County > > On 4/9/2019 7:21 PM, W2xj wrote: >> I agree except that even at 500KW a 2:1 or greater is the norm with >> open wire line. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Apr 9, 2019, at 19:10, Fred Jensen wrote: >>> >>> Well, the reflected power is created by a "virtual transmitter" at >>> the feedpoint of the antenna and heads down the coax which has a >>> surge impedance of Z0 ohms.? It meets the SO-239 at the TX and sees >>> an impedance of Z1, the impedance presented by the PA and output >>> filters.? If Z1=Z0, the power is dissipated as heat in the PA and >>> associated RF circuitry.? If Z1<>Z0, some is dissipated and some is >>> reflected, where some is radiated, and some is reflected [virtual >>> transmitter again].? Ad infinitum, and when forever is over, it is >>> all gone and everyone lives happily ever after. >>> >>> SWR and all the associated measuring equipment and concern with it >>> only became an issue when: 1) Coax replaced parallel lines and; 2) >>> Resonant output circuits were replaced by solid state amplifiers with >>> non-resonant filters.? When I sat for the Extra in early 1956, the >>> only question that involved standing waves was one about how Lecher >>> Lines could be used to measure transmitter frequency. >>> >>> It's important today but calculating it hasn't changed.? At 10 W, a >>> 2:1 SWR will probably work ok.? At 1500 W, a solid state amplifier >>> may not be happy with the voltages developed at its output connector. >>> >>> 73, >>> Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW >>> Sparks NV DM09dn >>> Washoe County >>> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From w2xj at w2xj.net Wed Apr 10 16:18:26 2019 From: w2xj at w2xj.net (W2xj) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:18:26 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] SWR and Power Output In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I think that this was covered. You don?t run a solid state unit into a mismatch. The antenna tuner in effect takes the place of the output network that existed with tube rigs. Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 10, 2019, at 11:39, Eugene wrote: > > The reason SWR should be of concern is the effect it has on what is presented to the solid state output device(s) in your radio. > The output power and final stage current is determined by the load presented by the antenna/tuner and the output matching network. > The output power is, P= supply voltage squared divided by 2xR(load). A 2:1 SWR could present a load either half or twice the design load for the 1:1 (50 ohm) SWR match or some where in between those two points with a complex impedance being presented to the output device(s). > Thus, the output power delivered by your radio and the final output device current and efficiency is directly related to the "match" presented to your radio by your antenna and/or tuner. > > Gene, N5LDX > > Sent from my iPad > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From wes_n7ws at triconet.org Wed Apr 10 16:58:10 2019 From: wes_n7ws at triconet.org (Wes) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 13:58:10 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] SWR - does it matter? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <97bff38b-0d50-6924-c862-269dddd478f6@triconet.org> At a given operating point, there is always some load Z that will minimize amplifier dissipation (and probably another that minimizes IMD).? The problem is, we don't normally know what it is, so guessing about it is pointless. Hence specs like X watts into Y SWR (nominal). Andy provided three data points. Changing the sign of the reactance will leave the same SWR, but more than likely different amplifier response.? In fact, 50 +j0 might not be optimum.?? Who knows, maybe some point on the 1.5:1 circle on the Smith chart is better :-) Adding to this uncertainty is the fact that with the typical measurement circuitry in our PAs and tuners, we don't know the real SWR either. I, and others, discussed this in an earlier thread :http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-SWR-Numerical-Indication-td7643839.html Wes? N7WS On 4/10/2019 6:59 AM, Andy Durbin wrote: > As a counter to those who are asserting that SWR 1.5:1 is a good enough match for an antenna system I offer measured data for the KPA500. > > At 14.005 MHz my KPA500, when connected to a 1.44:1 SWR load (R37, X9), had a PA dissipation of over 500 watts when producing 400 watts RF output. When the load was changed to 1.30:1 (R39, X3) the PA dissipation was about 410 watts. When the load was changed to SWR 1.07:1 (R49, X3) the PA dissipation was reduced to under 400 watts. (The plots are far more informative than a text description but I can't post them here). > > If you don't mind your KPA500 running hot, and are prepared to accept it shutting down with PA DISS fault, then 1.5:1 SWR may be good enough for you. I'd rather know the complex impedance of the antenna system load and avoid loads that result in high PA dissipation. > > 73, > Andy, k3wyc > > From k6dgw at foothill.net Wed Apr 10 17:05:27 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:05:27 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: <1554921404555-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <23F99F1E-83AA-4DAB-8577-07D1C335A78C@me.com> <6202d008-ddae-670e-8d7c-07cca64635db@foothill.net> <1554921404555-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <369983b9-c342-b303-59aa-8e0093e13628@foothill.net> What?? You mean the guvmint has classified Carlsbad Caverns now? 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/10/2019 11:36 AM, K8TE wrote: > We have one in NM, however I am not allowed to talk/write about it. No, it > has nothing to do with Roswell. > > 73, Bill, K8TE > From k6dgw at foothill.net Wed Apr 10 17:15:55 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 14:15:55 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Measuring SWR (Long) In-Reply-To: <7012b836-098f-9ac0-981b-54315315e7da@blomand.net> References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> <1031208A-47B5-4A90-94A2-74E2DA8B585D@w2xj.net> <394dfe13-8684-a279-2408-3b276b61fb7b@foothill.net> <7012b836-098f-9ac0-981b-54315315e7da@blomand.net> Message-ID: <086fadf6-1b9a-3818-0796-d02ab13f7be2@foothill.net> It was a feeble attempt at humor, given the nearly countable infinity of posts here on baluns over the last few years including but not limited to what they are, what they aren't, how they work, do they even work?, and do they even exist at all.? Perhaps my attempt was more feeble than I thought. [:-) And, yes I know that "near infinity" is meaningless. 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/10/2019 11:13 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > Hummmm.......see: http://www.dj0ip.de/balun-stuff/ > > I seem to think this fellow has a good grasp about the "alien origin" > of baluns. > > 73 > Bob, K4TAX > > > On 4/10/2019 12:23 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: >> It also spawned the "balun," a mysterious device that may be of alien >> origin since no one seems to know exactly what it does or how it does >> it. > From rcrgs at verizon.net Wed Apr 10 21:28:21 2019 From: rcrgs at verizon.net (Robert G Strickland) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 01:28:21 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 filter alignment problem Message-ID: <6007f846-8e61-7e6f-5f8c-99e371dc8798@verizon.net> I have aligned my K2 crystal filters with Spectogram many times, but this time I've run into a problem that I can't figure out. Using Don's [and the manual's] instructions, I can align F1,F2,F3 in decreasing bandwidths. All works as per expectations. On F4, the alignment goes "ok," [as per Spectogram] but when I use it with on-the-air signals, the signal "disappears" and shows up about 900 cps lower and in "reverse" orientation [BFO on opposite side]. When the signal disappears, I can change filters [F1/F2/F3] and it's right there where it should be with the bandwidth getting narrower as expected. But, switching to F4, it's gone. I have tried changing the BFO frequency throughout its whole range when in F4, thinking that I've aligned it on the "wrong" side. No luck. I'm stumped. Any and all suggestions welcomed. ...robert -- Robert G Strickland, PhD ABPH - KE2WY rcrgs at verizon.net.usa Syracuse, New York, USA From kh at kh-translation.dk Thu Apr 11 07:14:34 2019 From: kh at kh-translation.dk (Kjeld Holm) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 11:14:34 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 with transverter on 144 operating digital motes Message-ID: Dear all, Can anyone comment on this XV144 internal transverter. Any difference in performance on 144MHz when installed in K3S or in K3 serial number about 1250? Vy 73 de OZ1CCM, Kjeld From Gary at ka1j.com Thu Apr 11 08:44:29 2019 From: Gary at ka1j.com (Gary Smith) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 08:44:29 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KAT3A 160M issue Message-ID: <5CAF36AD.31368.16F45BA@Gary.ka1j.com> I have been having unusual transmit issues with 160M, SWR issues I have long thought was antenna related. Last night I found when transmitting on 160 the SWR on the LP-100 suddenly showed 9.1 and the same with the remote sensor for the P3 but no output shown on the P3 wattmeter. I connected a dummy to the amp, same issue. attached it to the back of the K3s & the same issue with the autotuner unable to get a good match (HIGH SWR). This was only on 160, all other bands were fine. I pulled a KAT3 from my backup K3 and all now works well, 160M had what showed as a beautiful SWR & the amp was very happy showing a 1.2 SWR Before I call Elecraft & take up their tech time on a phone call, is there anything I might check on this KAT3A regarding a 160 failure before starting a RMA? The 160 toroid looks fine and no obvious issues show to inspection. thanks & 73, Gary KA1J From richard.corfield at gmail.com Thu Apr 11 09:37:10 2019 From: richard.corfield at gmail.com (Richard Corfield) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 14:37:10 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] Load Impedance (was Re: Measuring SWR In-Reply-To: <086fadf6-1b9a-3818-0796-d02ab13f7be2@foothill.net> References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> <1031208A-47B5-4A90-94A2-74E2DA8B585D@w2xj.net> <394dfe13-8684-a279-2408-3b276b61fb7b@foothill.net> <7012b836-098f-9ac0-981b-54315315e7da@blomand.net> <086fadf6-1b9a-3818-0796-d02ab13f7be2@foothill.net> Message-ID: I'm experimenting with portable antennas at the moment for my KX3 and, rather than cut the 80m legs of my link dipole to get an antenna that resonates on 60m, I've experimented with running it off centre. I've found what looks like resonance at the right frequency range, based on low return loss. http://m0rjc.me.uk/screenshot_20190411-132334/ The problem is, that impedance is low. I guess it's being transformed down by the 10m of feed line, as normal wisdom for an off-centre feed is high impedance due to the lower currents and higher voltages towards the ends of a half wave antenna. Considering a velocity factor of 0.66 that feed line is about 1/4 wavelength long! Presumably the KXAT-3 will tune this, but do I lose efficiency by having what would be higher currents in its circuitry? - Richard On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 22:56, Fred Jensen wrote: > It was a feeble attempt at humor, given the nearly countable infinity of > posts here on baluns over the last few years including but not limited > to what they are, what they aren't, how they work, do they even work?, > and do they even exist at all. Perhaps my attempt was more feeble than > I thought. [:-) And, yes I know that "near infinity" is meaningless. > > 73, > Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW > Sparks NV DM09dn > Washoe County > > On 4/10/2019 11:13 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > > Hummmm.......see: http://www.dj0ip.de/balun-stuff/ > > > > I seem to think this fellow has a good grasp about the "alien origin" > > of baluns. > > > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX > > > > > > On 4/10/2019 12:23 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: > >> It also spawned the "balun," a mysterious device that may be of alien > >> origin since no one seems to know exactly what it does or how it does > >> it. > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From donwilh at embarqmail.com Thu Apr 11 10:00:25 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:00:25 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 filter alignment problem In-Reply-To: <6007f846-8e61-7e6f-5f8c-99e371dc8798@verizon.net> References: <6007f846-8e61-7e6f-5f8c-99e371dc8798@verizon.net> Message-ID: <35a82baa-0543-8cd3-c765-1a42653b2836@embarqmail.com> Richard, Try widening the FL4 filter out to 0.2 instead of 0.1. With the more narrow setting there is often more attenuation with little actual reduction in width. When aligning the BFOs, pay attention to the DAC values (and/or frequencies). The ones for CW must be less than the filter center and those for CWrev must be greater than the filter center. Normally the CW FL4 will have a BFO frequency near 4913.12 and for CWrev a frequency near 4914.3 kHz. Make certain when aligning the filters with Spectrogram you use a source of wideband noise. If you are using 'antenna noise', be certain there are no signals nearby. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/10/2019 9:28 PM, Robert G Strickland via Elecraft wrote: > I have aligned my K2 crystal filters with Spectogram many times, but > this time I've run into a problem that I can't figure out. > > Using Don's [and the manual's] instructions, I can align F1,F2,F3 in > decreasing bandwidths. All works as per expectations. On F4, the > alignment goes "ok," [as per Spectogram] but when I use it with > on-the-air signals, the signal "disappears" and shows up about 900 cps > lower and in "reverse" orientation [BFO on opposite side]. When the > signal disappears, I can change filters [F1/F2/F3] and it's right there > where it should be with the bandwidth getting narrower as expected. But, > switching to F4, it's gone. I have tried changing the BFO frequency > throughout its whole range when in F4, thinking that I've aligned it on > the "wrong" side. No luck. I'm stumped. Any and all suggestions welcomed. From k2vco.vic at gmail.com Thu Apr 11 10:09:05 2019 From: k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:09:05 +0300 Subject: [Elecraft] KAT3A 160M issue In-Reply-To: <5CAF36AD.31368.16F45BA@Gary.ka1j.com> References: <5CAF36AD.31368.16F45BA@Gary.ka1j.com> Message-ID: <51c202d9-2b6f-682f-371d-7ffb3a8d0b2d@gmail.com> If I had a problem with a KAT3, the first thing I would check would be the relays. But where is the LP100 connected? It must be AFTER the KAT3, so a problem in the KAT3 would not change the SWR indicated on the LP100 (or the P3 for that matter). Maybe you had a cable, connector, or antenna problem that damaged the KAT3 somehow? 73, Victor, 4X6GP Rehovot, Israel Formerly K2VCO CWops no. 5 http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ On 11/04/2019 15:44, Gary Smith wrote: > I have been having unusual transmit issues > with 160M, SWR issues I have long thought > was antenna related. > > Last night I found when transmitting on > 160 the SWR on the LP-100 suddenly showed > 9.1 and the same with the remote sensor > for the P3 but no output shown on the P3 > wattmeter. I connected a dummy to the amp, > same issue. attached it to the back of the > K3s & the same issue with the autotuner > unable to get a good match (HIGH SWR). > > This was only on 160, all other bands were > fine. > > I pulled a KAT3 from my backup K3 and all > now works well, 160M had what showed as a > beautiful SWR & the amp was very happy > showing a 1.2 SWR > > Before I call Elecraft & take up their > tech time on a phone call, is there > anything I might check on this KAT3A > regarding a 160 failure before starting a > RMA? The 160 toroid looks fine and no > obvious issues show to inspection. > > thanks & 73, > > Gary > KA1J > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From rmcgraw at blomand.net Thu Apr 11 10:17:04 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 09:17:04 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Load Impedance (was Re: Measuring SWR In-Reply-To: References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> <1031208A-47B5-4A90-94A2-74E2DA8B585D@w2xj.net> <394dfe13-8684-a279-2408-3b276b61fb7b@foothill.net> <7012b836-098f-9ac0-981b-54315315e7da@blomand.net> <086fadf6-1b9a-3818-0796-d02ab13f7be2@foothill.net> Message-ID: In many instances using a balun, not for balanced to unbalanced applications, but for impedance transformation application is suggested.?? Use a 4:1 as a 1:4 in order to get the low Z to a higher value.? In most tuners, the low impedance range has more loss than the high impedance range.?? I recall that Elecraft makes just this item. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/11/2019 8:37 AM, Richard Corfield wrote: > I'm experimenting with portable antennas at the moment for my KX3 and, > rather than cut the 80m legs of my link dipole to get an antenna that > resonates on 60m, I've experimented with running it off centre. I've found > what looks like resonance at the right frequency range, based on low return > loss. > > http://m0rjc.me.uk/screenshot_20190411-132334/ > > The problem is, that impedance is low. I guess it's being transformed down > by the 10m of feed line, as normal wisdom for an off-centre feed is high > impedance due to the lower currents and higher voltages towards the ends of > a half wave antenna. Considering a velocity factor of 0.66 that feed line > is about 1/4 wavelength long! > > Presumably the KXAT-3 will tune this, but do I lose efficiency by having > what would be higher currents in its circuitry? > > - Richard > > On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 at 22:56, Fred Jensen wrote: > >> It was a feeble attempt at humor, given the nearly countable infinity of >> posts here on baluns over the last few years including but not limited >> to what they are, what they aren't, how they work, do they even work?, >> and do they even exist at all. Perhaps my attempt was more feeble than >> I thought. [:-) And, yes I know that "near infinity" is meaningless. >> >> 73, >> Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW >> Sparks NV DM09dn >> Washoe County >> >> On 4/10/2019 11:13 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: >>> Hummmm.......see: http://www.dj0ip.de/balun-stuff/ >>> >>> I seem to think this fellow has a good grasp about the "alien origin" >>> of baluns. >>> >>> 73 >>> Bob, K4TAX >>> >>> >>> On 4/10/2019 12:23 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: >>>> It also spawned the "balun," a mysterious device that may be of alien >>>> origin since no one seems to know exactly what it does or how it does >>>> it. >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From robertwschumacher at yahoo.com Thu Apr 11 13:45:05 2019 From: robertwschumacher at yahoo.com (Bob Schumacher) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Line For Sale From SK Estate References: <1447319544.1512995.1555004705227.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1447319544.1512995.1555004705227@mail.yahoo.com> I am assisting the family of a recent SK who was an OP for 66 years. He purchased the K3S line just 14 months ago and it is in perfect condition. Non-smoking shack. The following Elecraft equipment is offered: KPA500-K? s/n 3364? ? ?500 Watt Amplifier? ? ? ? ? $1,575.00 KAT500-F? s/n 2424? ? ?500 Watt Auto Tuner? ? ? ?$? 525.00 E850463 KAT500 to KPA500 cables (2)? ? ? ? ? ? ? $? ? 45.00 K3S-F? s/n 11526? ?Transceiver? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? $2,438.00KPA3A-F? 100 Watt AmpKANT35ppm Oscillator2.7 kHz Filter6? ? kHz FilterGeneral Coverage Rx? KHAT Elecraft Hat? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?Free There is no P3 Panadapter but there is a ColibriNANO USB SDR Receiver offered for $218.00. When connected to the K3S Receive Out port, an outsatanding Panadapter is created! I have copies of all invoices and all Elecraft supplied cables are included. The buyer may pick up the equipment in Indianapolis, Indiana or pay for shipping in original Elecraft boxes (No original box for SP3 speaker). Please email W9DBR at robertwschumacher at yahoo.com. Thanks! From donwilh at embarqmail.com Thu Apr 11 17:22:58 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:22:58 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Load Impedance (was Re: Measuring SWR In-Reply-To: References: <316312589.710340.1554838968189.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <316312589.710340.1554838968189@mail.yahoo.com> <5CAD10FF.2020307@roadrunner.com> <1031208A-47B5-4A90-94A2-74E2DA8B585D@w2xj.net> <394dfe13-8684-a279-2408-3b276b61fb7b@foothill.net> <7012b836-098f-9ac0-981b-54315315e7da@blomand.net> <086fadf6-1b9a-3818-0796-d02ab13f7be2@foothill.net> Message-ID: <71039867-2078-6ee5-48a6-c09ff0bab3ca@embarqmail.com> Richard, More specifics are needed for a good answer. The easy way to do it is to measure the impedance at the shack end of the feedline with an antenna analyzer. Yes, you moved the feedpoint away from center (but did not say by how much) and the voltages will be higher and the current will be lower at the frequency where the radiator is resonant, but it is an unknown at other frequencies. The quarter wave feedline -- at what frequency is it a 1/4 wave? It will certainly act as a matching transormer, but more detail is needed. As I indicated, measure it with an antenna analyzer to see what the real situation is on 60 meters. The theoretical loss will because of currents through the inductors will increase, but the practical consideration for the KXAT3 will be minimal as long as the SWR does not exceed 10:1. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/11/2019 9:37 AM, Richard Corfield wrote: > I'm experimenting with portable antennas at the moment for my KX3 and, > rather than cut the 80m legs of my link dipole to get an antenna that > resonates on 60m, I've experimented with running it off centre. I've found > what looks like resonance at the right frequency range, based on low return > loss. > > http://m0rjc.me.uk/screenshot_20190411-132334/ > > The problem is, that impedance is low. I guess it's being transformed down > by the 10m of feed line, as normal wisdom for an off-centre feed is high > impedance due to the lower currents and higher voltages towards the ends of > a half wave antenna. Considering a velocity factor of 0.66 that feed line > is about 1/4 wavelength long! > > Presumably the KXAT-3 will tune this, but do I lose efficiency by having > what would be higher currents in its circuitry? From rcrgs at verizon.net Thu Apr 11 19:46:36 2019 From: rcrgs at verizon.net (Robert G Strickland) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 23:46:36 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 filter alignment problem In-Reply-To: <35a82baa-0543-8cd3-c765-1a42653b2836@embarqmail.com> References: <6007f846-8e61-7e6f-5f8c-99e371dc8798@verizon.net> <35a82baa-0543-8cd3-c765-1a42653b2836@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: Don... Bingo! The F4 filter setting was too narrow, as you advised. Also, the BFO was somewhere off from where it belonged. Once I got those two item adjusted everything worked as per specs. I was impressed that the BFO values that you quoted were more or less right on. Seems like you have some experience with the K2 :-). Thanks much for your time and attention, as always. Have a good day. ...robert On 4/11/2019 14:00, Don Wilhelm wrote: > Richard, > > Try widening the FL4 filter out to 0.2 instead of 0.1. With the more > narrow setting there is often more attenuation with little actual > reduction in width. > > When aligning the BFOs, pay attention to the DAC values (and/or > frequencies). The ones for CW must be less than the filter center and > those for CWrev must be greater than the filter center. Normally the CW > FL4 will have a BFO frequency near 4913.12 and for CWrev a frequency > near 4914.3 kHz. > > Make certain when aligning the filters with Spectrogram you use a source > of wideband noise. If you are using 'antenna noise', be certain there > are no signals nearby. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/10/2019 9:28 PM, Robert G Strickland via Elecraft wrote: >> I have aligned my K2 crystal filters with Spectogram many times, but >> this time I've run into a problem that I can't figure out. >> >> Using Don's [and the manual's] instructions, I can align F1,F2,F3 in >> decreasing bandwidths. All works as per expectations. On F4, the >> alignment goes "ok," [as per Spectogram] but when I use it with >> on-the-air signals, the signal "disappears" and shows up about 900 cps >> lower and in "reverse" orientation [BFO on opposite side]. When the >> signal disappears, I can change filters [F1/F2/F3] and it's right >> there where it should be with the bandwidth getting narrower as >> expected. But, switching to F4, it's gone. I have tried changing the >> BFO frequency throughout its whole range when in F4, thinking that >> I've aligned it on the "wrong" side. No luck. I'm stumped. Any and all >> suggestions welcomed. > -- Robert G Strickland, PhD ABPH - KE2WY rcrgs at verizon.net.usa Syracuse, New York, USA From softblue at windstream.net Thu Apr 11 20:40:21 2019 From: softblue at windstream.net (Dick Dickinson) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 20:40:21 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Future Elecraft Products Message-ID: <001d01d4f0c8$4f981780$eec84680$@windstream.net> Will future Elecraft products be IoT compatible? Dick - KA5KKT From n6kr at elecraft.com Thu Apr 11 20:51:13 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 17:51:13 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Future Elecraft Products In-Reply-To: <001d01d4f0c8$4f981780$eec84680$@windstream.net> References: <001d01d4f0c8$4f981780$eec84680$@windstream.net> Message-ID: <17E7232B-B210-4D8F-AED4-F79957A229CE@elecraft.com> Dick Dickinson (KATKKT) wrote: > Will future Elecraft products be IoT compatible? Yes, if they are pet collars, door cams, keyfob locators, or mood-sensing personal heating appliances. Otherwise I'm not sure. What did you have in mind? Wayne N6KR From n6kr at elecraft.com Thu Apr 11 21:01:05 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:01:05 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Who has the AX1 antenna DX record? Message-ID: <71279A9E-40C7-4CF4-AF7A-06D8C180AA23@elecraft.com> Many of our customers are shrugging off the lack of sunspots and boldly going places with their QRP gear and AX1 antenna. So, a quick survey for those who have ventured thus: What's your best DX? This feedback will be useful as we consider future antenna products. 73, Wayne N6KR From edouard at lafargue.name Thu Apr 11 21:25:09 2019 From: edouard at lafargue.name (Edouard Lafargue) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:25:09 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] [KX3] Who has the AX1 antenna DX record? In-Reply-To: <71279A9E-40C7-4CF4-AF7A-06D8C180AA23@elecraft.com> References: <71279A9E-40C7-4CF4-AF7A-06D8C180AA23@elecraft.com> Message-ID: For me that would be Bonaire, from Lake Tahoe in California - a phone/SSB contact though, a couple of months back, Ed W6ELA On Thu, Apr 11, 2019, 18:01 Wayne Burdick n6kr at elecraft.com [KX3] < KX3-noreply at yahoogroups.com> wrote: > > > Many of our customers are shrugging off the lack of sunspots and boldly > going places with their QRP gear and AX1 antenna. So, a quick survey for > those who have ventured thus: What's your best DX? > > This feedback will be useful as we consider future antenna products. > > 73, > Wayne > N6KR > > __._,_.___ > ------------------------------ > Posted by: Wayne Burdick > ------------------------------ > Reply via web post > > ? Reply to sender > > ? Reply to group > > ? Start a New Topic > > ? Messages in this topic > > (1) > ------------------------------ > Have you tried the highest rated email app? > With 4.5 stars in iTunes, the Yahoo Mail app is the highest rated email > app on the market. What are you waiting for? Now you can access all your > inboxes (Gmail, Outlook, AOL and more) in one place. Never delete an email > again with 1000GB of free cloud storage. > ------------------------------ > Visit Your Group > > > > [image: Yahoo! Groups] > > ? Privacy ? > Unsubscribe ? Terms > of Use > > SPONSORED LINKS > . > > __,_._,___ > From pheller at me.com Thu Apr 11 21:46:30 2019 From: pheller at me.com (Phillip Heller) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:46:30 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 (S/N 4190) + Accessories for sale on eBay Message-ID: <42A6F019-BC26-41A7-8468-39AEB8E850EC@me.com> Greetings, Having purchased a KX2 for Camping, SOTA, etc, I?ve decided to list my KX3 (S/N 4190) for sale on eBay. You can find it here: https://www.ebay.com/itm/233195652894 73, Phil KB1FIY From rosen.bruce at gmail.com Thu Apr 11 21:57:51 2019 From: rosen.bruce at gmail.com (K1FFX) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 18:57:51 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] Who has the AX1 antenna DX record? In-Reply-To: <71279A9E-40C7-4CF4-AF7A-06D8C180AA23@elecraft.com> References: <71279A9E-40C7-4CF4-AF7A-06D8C180AA23@elecraft.com> Message-ID: <1555034271979-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Worked KH6 from the Florida Panhandle on 17 and 15 meters running about 12 watts with my K2 and KAT100. The AX1 was mounted on a very short camera tripod and was out on our 3rd floor balcony as short distance from the Gulf. 73 - Bruce K1FFX ----- Bruce Rosen K1FFX K2/100 6982 KSB2 KAT100-1 KAF2 KIO2 -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From wrmoore47 at gmail.com Thu Apr 11 22:05:56 2019 From: wrmoore47 at gmail.com (Randy Moore) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 21:05:56 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] [T1] Newly assembled T1 inop Message-ID: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> Just completed an Elecraft T1 ATU. I built and used one several years ago and wished I hadn?t sold it, so built another one. But it?s not working. When I plug-in the (tested good) 9v battery, the yellow LED blinks 4 times (not mentioned in the manual that I can see), but there?s no response to any other button pushes. I went back through all the tests in the assembly manual and they are AOK. I followed the voltage source through the 6v regulator and that?s ok, although the regulator output reads 5.0v on my DMM. Is that too low? I will confess something. When I inserted the 28 pin MCU into its socket, no matter how I tried, I could not get it in all the way. I?ve socketed dozens of ICs and never had this happen before. The instructions insist on getting it in so that the ?shoulders? of the pins contact the socket. I was about 1/16? short of that. So I clipped about that much off all the pins and got the pin ?shoulders? to contact the socket. I could not have gotten the little control board to fully seat over the MCU without doing this. But I may have ruined the MCU by doing this... Any help appreciated! 73, Randy, KS4L From dave at nk7z.net Thu Apr 11 23:51:21 2019 From: dave at nk7z.net (Dave Cole (NK7Z)) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 20:51:21 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: As remote Base Message-ID: <9c056211-edfd-1928-d270-34dc9514e2cd@nk7z.net> Hello, I am considering the use of a remote base type of setup to get away from the RFI in my area. I have finally given up on trying to fight it, and want to move the rig away from the city, as opposed to hunting down and correcting every new RFI source endlessly. My station consists of a KPA500, P3, and K3. I am using a P3 external keyboard, running an external computer to do FT8, and finally CW via the radio, not using a computer. Is there a system which would allow the same functionality I now have, remotely via the Internet? -- 73s and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Technical Specialist ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL OOC for Oregon From steve at kj5t.net Fri Apr 12 00:02:29 2019 From: steve at kj5t.net (Steve Anness) Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 23:02:29 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Who has the AX1 antenna DX record? In-Reply-To: <1555034271979-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <71279A9E-40C7-4CF4-AF7A-06D8C180AA23@elecraft.com> <1555034271979-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: So far Hawaii from Texas. Operating with the AX1 running 5 watts on on phone during the CQ WPX SSB contest. Using the antenna mounted on my third floor balcony. Need to take it out and get a little higher elevation and see what happens. The KX2 was an impulse buy, I like it but need to use it more for sure. 73 Steve KJ5T On Thu, Apr 11, 2019, 8:58 PM K1FFX wrote: > Worked KH6 from the Florida Panhandle on 17 and 15 meters running about 12 > watts with my K2 and KAT100. The AX1 was mounted on a very short camera > tripod and was out on our 3rd floor balcony as short distance from the > Gulf. > > 73 - > > Bruce K1FFX > > > > > ----- > Bruce Rosen > K1FFX > K2/100 6982 KSB2 KAT100-1 KAF2 KIO2 > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From bbaines at mac.com Fri Apr 12 01:00:44 2019 From: bbaines at mac.com (Barry Baines) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 01:00:44 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: As remote Base In-Reply-To: <9c056211-edfd-1928-d270-34dc9514e2cd@nk7z.net> References: <9c056211-edfd-1928-d270-34dc9514e2cd@nk7z.net> Message-ID: Dave: > On Apr 11, 2019, at 11:51 PM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote: > > Hello, > > I am considering the use of a remote base type of setup to get away from the RFI in my area. I have finally given up on trying to fight it, and want to move the rig away from the city, as opposed to hunting down and correcting every new RFI source endlessly. > > My station consists of a KPA500, P3, and K3. I am using a P3 external keyboard, running an external computer to do FT8, and finally CW via the radio, not using a computer. > > Is there a system which would allow the same functionality I now have, remotely via the Internet? Remote operation is certainly feasible, but it does introduce new considerations/tradeoffs. I?ve been operating remote since purchasing my K3 system in 2014 specifically for remote operation. About 80% of my operating is done remotely. 1. I use a K3/IO-mini with the Remote Rig setup to control the K3 because the K3/IO-Mini front panel is the same as the K3 and I avoid the need to use a computer to control the K3. 2. I control the KPA-500 using the Remote Rig RC-1216H as it provides a web-based front panel that matches the KPA-500. As it is a web-based interface, I can use any device (Mac, ioS iPhone or iPAD, Windows PC) to access the KPA-500 front panel. 3. I have the KAT-500 Tuner which I am forced to run the Elecraft Utility to manage it. I have a serial-to-ethernet converter in the ham shack and my network at the ham shack location is linked to my location (through VPN) so that the Windows computer at my location will connect to the KAT-500 serial interface. 4. I do not have access to my P3 operating remotely. Others have installed video cams aimed at their P3 to forward imagery to their location to see what the P3 is displaying. Others who do this may have some thoughts on managing the P3 remotely. 5. Antenna selection is done using an Antenna Genius from 4O3A. There are a total of 8 antenna ports and two radio ports. The K3 system is connected to Port A and communicates with the Elecraft through BCD to select the antenna based upon the band that the K3 is set (e.g. 10-15-20 goes to the tribander, other bands such as 40 and 80 to an EFHW with additional ports for a dummy load and future 6M antenna). The Elecraft interface to the AG is based upon Y-boxes developed by Bob Wilson, N6TV. See: https://www.kkn.net/~n6tv/Y-BOX/ Antenna Genius Port B is used by my Flex-6700 Antenna Port ?1? and associated hardware. The Flex communicates directly with the AG through a CAT5/Local Area Network connection. I also use the AG utility but it can only run in Windows and works with a remote connection through VPN. My primary use for the K3 is voice communications, so I have not delved into digital modes (yet). My presumption is that operating digital may require using the PC in the ham shack to do the actual digital operation while connecting to the shack PC via Team Viewer or other remote access software to manage the process. Again, others who are actually doing digital modes while operating remote may have specific suggestions. Overall, I?ve been very pleased with the K3 setup operating remotely. The Codec(s) used by Remote Rig require very low bandwidth while providing excellent audio. As my station is located in rural SE Georgia where internet access (at best) is typically 768 Kbps upload/20 Mbps download, I have no problems running the K3 remotely while using SSB. While I also enjoy the Flex (particularly since SmartSDR v2 was introduced that allows remote connection), slow internet is better handled by the K3 system because of the Remote Rig audio Codecs and the lack of panadapter/waterfall display that can take up bandwidth. FWIW, Barry Baines, WD4ASW > > -- > 73s and thanks, > Dave (NK7Z) > https://www.nk7z.net > ARRL Technical Specialist > ARRL Volunteer Examiner > ARRL OOC for Oregon > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From hbjr at optilink.us Fri Apr 12 08:14:39 2019 From: hbjr at optilink.us (HB) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 08:14:39 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Who has the AX1 antenna DX record? In-Reply-To: References: <71279A9E-40C7-4CF4-AF7A-06D8C180AA23@elecraft.com> <1555034271979-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: So far Washington State from Georgia on 20 m running 10 watts from a picnic table near the top of a dam on a POTA activation. I had the AX1 connected directly to the KX3 with the bipod and was using the supplied counterpoise. Hank K4HYJ > On Apr 12, 2019, at 12:02 AM, Steve Anness wrote: > > So far Hawaii from Texas. Operating with the AX1 running 5 watts on on > phone during the CQ WPX SSB contest. Using the antenna mounted on my third > floor balcony. Need to take it out and get a little higher elevation and > see what happens. The KX2 was an impulse buy, I like it but need to use it > more for sure. > > 73 Steve KJ5T > >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019, 8:58 PM K1FFX wrote: >> >> Worked KH6 from the Florida Panhandle on 17 and 15 meters running about 12 >> watts with my K2 and KAT100. The AX1 was mounted on a very short camera >> tripod and was out on our 3rd floor balcony as short distance from the >> Gulf. >> >> 73 - >> >> Bruce K1FFX >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> Bruce Rosen >> K1FFX >> K2/100 6982 KSB2 KAT100-1 KAF2 KIO2 >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From kt5te at watershipfarm.com Fri Apr 12 08:51:45 2019 From: kt5te at watershipfarm.com (William Rascher) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 07:51:45 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Who has the AX1 antenna DX record? In-Reply-To: <71279A9E-40C7-4CF4-AF7A-06D8C180AA23@elecraft.com> References: <71279A9E-40C7-4CF4-AF7A-06D8C180AA23@elecraft.com> Message-ID: <19448516.nNTSYYx0ym@linux-hq78> >From my back porch, closest spot to the coffee pot ;-), the farthest place with my KX2/AX1 has been New Hampshire with FT8. What was interesting for me was his +0.0db, and he received me as -6db. -- 73, Bill KT5TE On Thursday, April 11, 2019 8:01:05 PM CDT Wayne Burdick wrote: > Many of our customers are shrugging off the lack of sunspots and boldly > going places with their QRP gear and AX1 antenna. So, a quick survey for > those who have ventured thus: What's your best DX? > > This feedback will be useful as we consider future antenna products. > > 73, > Wayne > N6KR From donwilh at embarqmail.com Fri Apr 12 10:27:25 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:27:25 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 filter alignment problem In-Reply-To: References: <6007f846-8e61-7e6f-5f8c-99e371dc8798@verizon.net> <35a82baa-0543-8cd3-c765-1a42653b2836@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <24028cb6-1525-2087-23a4-6875ff2b8950@embarqmail.com> Robert, Yes, I have 20 years experience with the K2.? I have seen many "strange" problems on my years repairing them, some are user induced. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/11/2019 7:46 PM, Robert G Strickland wrote: > Don... > > Bingo! The F4 filter setting was too narrow, as you advised. Also, the > BFO was somewhere off from where it belonged. Once I got those two > item adjusted everything worked as per specs. I was impressed that the > BFO values that you quoted were more or less right on. Seems like you > have some experience with the K2 :-). Thanks much for your time and > attention, as always. Have a good day. > > ...robert > From w2bpi1 at aol.com Fri Apr 12 10:47:18 2019 From: w2bpi1 at aol.com (George H. Gates) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 14:47:18 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] FS: W1 References: <1125110348.2372677.1555080438693.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1125110348.2372677.1555080438693@mail.yahoo.com> Elecraft W1 wattmeter $100 shipped. Works great. Paypal OK. 72 George/W2BPI From Gary at ka1j.com Fri Apr 12 10:47:51 2019 From: Gary at ka1j.com (Gary Smith) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:47:51 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] WTB: KAT3A tuner Module Message-ID: <5CB0A517.8440.7068488@Gary.ka1j.com> Looks like I need a replacement KAT3A tuner. Weighing the cost of repair/replacement, I wonder if anyone has one that they did not use, are not needing? If so, please contact me off list with the details. 73, Gary KA1J From guzzidog11 at yahoo.com Fri Apr 12 10:55:07 2019 From: guzzidog11 at yahoo.com (John Sager) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 14:55:07 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] Who has the AX1 antenna DX record? In-Reply-To: References: <71279A9E-40C7-4CF4-AF7A-06D8C180AA23@elecraft.com> <1555034271979-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <606104041.248693.1555080907395@mail.yahoo.com> I worked France and Germany during the recent ARRL CW contest from Utah.? What makes it even better is I was indoors at my kitchen table using my KX3 running 10 watts with the counterpoise wire on the kitchen floor.? I have also worked Hawaii, Mexico, the Caribbean and all over the US on 20 meters on CW from the same location because I was too lazy to set up an outdoor antenna during very cold Utah winter weather.? My first contact after receiving the antenna and attaching it to my radio was XE2X in Mexico (CW from my kitchen table running 5 watts).? Even my wife, who isn't a ham, was impressed ;-)? The AX1 has been the perfect complement to my KX3 and KX2 for casual quick deployment. John W7SAG On ?Friday?, ?April? ?12?, ?2019? ?07?:?15?:?29? ?AM? ?CDT, HB wrote: So far Washington State from Georgia on 20 m running 10 watts from a picnic table near the top of a dam on a POTA activation. I had the AX1 connected directly to the KX3 with the bipod and was using the supplied counterpoise. Hank K4HYJ > On Apr 12, 2019, at 12:02 AM, Steve Anness wrote: > > So far Hawaii from Texas. Operating with the AX1 running 5 watts on on > phone during the CQ WPX SSB contest.? Using the antenna mounted on my third > floor balcony.? Need to take it out and get a little higher elevation and > see what happens.? The KX2 was an impulse buy, I like it but need to use it > more for sure. > > 73 Steve KJ5T > >> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019, 8:58 PM K1FFX wrote: >> >> Worked KH6 from the Florida Panhandle on 17 and 15 meters running about 12 >> watts with my K2 and KAT100.? The AX1 was mounted on a very short camera >> tripod and was out on our 3rd floor balcony as short distance from the >> Gulf. >> >> 73 - >> >> Bruce K1FFX >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> Bruce Rosen >> K1FFX >> K2/100 6982 KSB2 KAT100-1 KAF2 KIO2 >> >> -- >> Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From mtrager1 at twc.com Fri Apr 12 10:59:15 2019 From: mtrager1 at twc.com (Michael Trager) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:59:15 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] For Sale: K3-100 w P3, 2M upgraded to S version Message-ID: <000b01d4f140$4db31550$e9193ff0$@twc.com> Want to own a Elecraft K3 that has most of the "S" upgrades installed including the 2 Meter Module? I am the original owner (non smoker) of serial #5785 purchased in August of 2011 and it includes: K3 100Watt Upgrade KAT3 ATU KTCX03-1 upgraded TCXO Ref Osc. 2.7 KHz Upgraded Filter KBPF3 General Coverage RX Module updated to "S" version KFL3A-6K AM Filter KFL3B-FM FM 8-Pole Roofing Filter KDVR3 Digital Voice Recorder KFL3A 400 Hz 8-Pole Roofing Filter K144XV-100-K 2 Meter Module K144RFLK Reference Lock Module P3-K Panadapter KIO3BUPKT KIO3B "S" version upgrade Kit KSYN3AUPG KSYN3A "S" version synthesizer upgrade Kit KXV3B RX Antenna, IF Out, Preamp, Transverter Interface Kit KBPF3 General Coverage Rcvr Mod Kit CBLP3Y K3S Adapter Cable for existing P3 Owners This K3 "S" upgraded kit, expertly built by me works excellent and looks brand new. Including all the upgrades the cost of this station is approximately $5000.00 Asking price is $3500.00 shipping included (CONUSA). Station will ship via USPS Priority Mail/ Insured and will be expertly packed. You can have this excellent station and save a lot of money over a new K3s! http://n2zdb.com/n2zdb/Station.jpg Please contact me off list at: mtrager1 at twc.com N2ZDB From jtmiller47 at gmail.com Fri Apr 12 11:24:05 2019 From: jtmiller47 at gmail.com (Jim Miller) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 11:24:05 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] 630m xvtr support? Message-ID: <6ABABF25-587B-4A4C-8191-D7DE0E9BCE13@gmail.com> Has the support for a 630m xvtr band via other than Test mode made it nearer the top of the list for the K3s? Presumably this would have an IF of zero and be able to use the DIGOUT0, LP setting and the XVTR IN/OUT jacks. Thanks Jim ab3cv From wrmoore47 at gmail.com Fri Apr 12 11:47:47 2019 From: wrmoore47 at gmail.com (Randy Moore) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 10:47:47 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] [T1] Newly assembled T1 inop In-Reply-To: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> Message-ID: Found the problem! As many would guess - it's a solder problem! A tiny splash of solder in a random location shorted one of the remote control lines to ground! 73, Randy, KS4L On Thu, Apr 11, 2019, 9:05 PM Randy Moore wrote: > Just completed an Elecraft T1 ATU. I built and used one several years ago > and wished I hadn?t sold it, so built another one. But it?s not working. > When I plug-in the (tested good) 9v battery, the yellow LED blinks 4 times > (not mentioned in the manual that I can see), but there?s no response to > any other button pushes. I went back through all the tests in the assembly > manual and they are AOK. I followed the voltage source through the 6v > regulator and that?s ok, although the regulator output reads 5.0v on my > DMM. Is that too low? > > I will confess something. When I inserted the 28 pin MCU into its socket, > no matter how I tried, I could not get it in all the way. I?ve socketed > dozens of ICs and never had this happen before. The instructions insist on > getting it in so that the ?shoulders? of the pins contact the socket. I was > about 1/16? short of that. So I clipped about that much off all the pins > and got the pin ?shoulders? to contact the socket. I could not have gotten > the little control board to fully seat over the MCU without doing this. But > I may have ruined the MCU by doing this... > > Any help appreciated! > > 73, > Randy, KS4L From a.durbin at msn.com Fri Apr 12 12:11:39 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 16:11:39 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Prototype KPA500 monitor Message-ID: The discussion of the impact of antenna system load on PA dissipation inspired me to create a display of KPA500 RF output, PA DC input, PA dissipation, and PA efficiency. The real time display is a lot more convenient than post processing data logger values in Excel. https://www.dropbox.com/s/h4dtxrlm891s5b9/Prototype%20KPA500%20Monitor.pdf?dl=0 73, Andy, k3wyc From w2bpi1 at aol.com Fri Apr 12 13:52:22 2019 From: w2bpi1 at aol.com (George H. Gates) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 17:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] Fwd: FS: W1 References: <958005156.2498341.1555091542042.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <958005156.2498341.1555091542042@mail.yahoo.com> This item sold. Geo/W2bpi From: w2bpi1 at aol.com To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Sent: 4/12/2019 10:47:18 AM Eastern Standard Time Subject: FS: W1 Elecraft W1 wattmeter $100 shipped. Works great. Paypal OK. 72 George/W2BPI From hbjr at optilink.us Fri Apr 12 19:47:07 2019 From: hbjr at optilink.us (HB) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 19:47:07 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> Message-ID: Hey folks? I have an unusual (I think) problem. I have a KX3 that I have used the KX3 utility software with several times without issue. Today when I start the software there is no COM port to select. In the bottom left hand part of the KX3 PORT window is says Serial Port is Closed. (I?m using the Elecraft USB cable for the KX3). I can?t get it to work. I can control my Kx3 with DXLabs using the COM port no problem. I can use the Elecraft Frequency editor with no problem. I can use WinLink Express no problem. But when I start the KX3 utility software I can?t select a COM port ? there are none listed. Here is my troubleshooting so far: 1. I know the COM port is there ? it works for other software 2. I used the FTDI driver removal tool and uninstalled the FTDI drivers 3. I uninstalled the KX3 software 4. Reinstalled everything ? but the issue remains Any ideas? PC: Surface Pro Laptop w/Windoze 10 Hank K4HYJ From nr4c at widomaker.com Fri Apr 12 20:02:20 2019 From: nr4c at widomaker.com (Nr4c) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 20:02:20 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: <20190412234720.EAE40149B285@mailman.qth.net> References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234720.EAE40149B285@mailman.qth.net> Message-ID: <02FAD7CA-186E-448C-9D4D-ABCABC68F588@widomaker.com> Did you re-boot the computer? Sent from my iPhone ...nr4c. bill > On Apr 12, 2019, at 7:47 PM, HB wrote: > > Hey folks? > I have an unusual (I think) problem. I have a KX3 that I have used the KX3 utility software with several times without issue. Today when I start the software there is no COM port to select. In the bottom left hand part of the KX3 PORT window is says Serial Port is Closed. (I?m using the Elecraft USB cable for the KX3). > > I can?t get it to work. I can control my Kx3 with DXLabs using the COM port no problem. I can use the Elecraft Frequency editor with no problem. I can use WinLink Express no problem. But when I start the KX3 utility software I can?t select a COM port ? there are none listed. > > Here is my troubleshooting so far: > 1. I know the COM port is there ? it works for other software > 2. I used the FTDI driver removal tool and uninstalled the FTDI drivers > 3. I uninstalled the KX3 software > 4. Reinstalled everything ? but the issue remains > > Any ideas? > > PC: Surface Pro Laptop w/Windoze 10 > > Hank > K4HYJ > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From Hamshack at N4ST.com Fri Apr 12 20:13:22 2019 From: Hamshack at N4ST.com (Jim - N4ST) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 20:13:22 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: <20190412234719.BCDA8149B1CA@mailman.qth.net> References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234719.BCDA8149B1CA@mailman.qth.net> Message-ID: <000301d4f18d$ba07c0a0$2e1741e0$@N4ST.com> I just had this problem today after "upgrading" to Windows 10 Ver 1809. Windows told me the COM port was closed, even though it showed up in device manager. A reboot fixed it. YMMV _____________ 73, Jim - N4ST -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 19:47 To: Elecraft list Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed Hey folks? I have an unusual (I think) problem. I have a KX3 that I have used the KX3 utility software with several times without issue. Today when I start the software there is no COM port to select. In the bottom left hand part of the KX3 PORT window is says Serial Port is Closed. (I?m using the Elecraft USB cable for the KX3). I can?t get it to work. I can control my Kx3 with DXLabs using the COM port no problem. I can use the Elecraft Frequency editor with no problem. I can use WinLink Express no problem. But when I start the KX3 utility software I can?t select a COM port ? there are none listed. Here is my troubleshooting so far: 1. I know the COM port is there ? it works for other software 2. I used the FTDI driver removal tool and uninstalled the FTDI drivers 3. I uninstalled the KX3 software 4. Reinstalled everything ? but the issue remains Any ideas? PC: Surface Pro Laptop w/Windoze 10 Hank K4HYJ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From donwilh at embarqmail.com Fri Apr 12 20:47:38 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 20:47:38 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: <20190412234720.B507D149B275@mailman.qth.net> References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234720.B507D149B275@mailman.qth.net> Message-ID: Hank, Re-boot the computer - it seems all the problems are in your computer. Oh, yes, power cycle the KX3 too, but that will not likely make a difference. After rebooting the computer, look in Device Manager to see which COM port your computer assigned to the KXUSB adapter, and use that COM port in all your applications as well as KX3 Utility. Windows sometimes changes the COM port (in its infinite wisdom) for you. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/12/2019 7:47 PM, HB wrote: > Hey folks? > I have an unusual (I think) problem. I have a KX3 that I have used the KX3 utility software with several times without issue. Today when I start the software there is no COM port to select. In the bottom left hand part of the KX3 PORT window is says Serial Port is Closed. (I?m using the Elecraft USB cable for the KX3). > > I can?t get it to work. I can control my Kx3 with DXLabs using the COM port no problem. I can use the Elecraft Frequency editor with no problem. I can use WinLink Express no problem. But when I start the KX3 utility software I can?t select a COM port ? there are none listed. > From hbjr at optilink.us Fri Apr 12 21:12:39 2019 From: hbjr at optilink.us (HB) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 21:12:39 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: <000301d4f18d$ba07c0a0$2e1741e0$@N4ST.com> References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234719.BCDA8149B1CA@mailman.qth.net> <000301d4f18d$ba07c0a0$2e1741e0$@N4ST.com> Message-ID: Yes ? multiple reboots. From: Jim - N4ST Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 8:21 PM To: 'HB'; 'Elecraft list' Subject: RE: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed I just had this problem today after "upgrading" to Windows 10 Ver 1809. Windows told me the COM port was closed, even though it showed up in device manager. A reboot fixed it. YMMV _____________ 73, Jim - N4ST -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 19:47 To: Elecraft list Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed Hey folks? I have an unusual (I think) problem. I have a KX3 that I have used the KX3 utility software with several times without issue. Today when I start the software there is no COM port to select. In the bottom left hand part of the KX3 PORT window is says Serial Port is Closed. (I?m using the Elecraft USB cable for the KX3). I can?t get it to work. I can control my Kx3 with DXLabs using the COM port no problem. I can use the Elecraft Frequency editor with no problem. I can use WinLink Express no problem. But when I start the KX3 utility software I can?t select a COM port ? there are none listed. Here is my troubleshooting so far: 1. I know the COM port is there ? it works for other software 2. I used the FTDI driver removal tool and uninstalled the FTDI drivers 3. I uninstalled the KX3 software 4. Reinstalled everything ? but the issue remains Any ideas? PC: Surface Pro Laptop w/Windoze 10 Hank K4HYJ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From hbjr at optilink.us Fri Apr 12 21:34:14 2019 From: hbjr at optilink.us (HB) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 21:34:14 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234720.B507D149B275@mailman.qth.net> Message-ID: Don?. I have verified the COM port in the Device Manager but the KX3 Utility does not show any COM ports in the port window. Hank K4HYJ From: Don Wilhelm Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 9:07 PM To: HB; Elecraft list Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed Hank, Re-boot the computer - it seems all the problems are in your computer. Oh, yes, power cycle the KX3 too, but that will not likely make a difference. After rebooting the computer, look in Device Manager to see which COM port your computer assigned to the KXUSB adapter, and use that COM port in all your applications as well as KX3 Utility. Windows sometimes changes the COM port (in its infinite wisdom) for you. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/12/2019 7:47 PM, HB wrote: > Hey folks? > I have an unusual (I think) problem. I have a KX3 that I have used the KX3 utility software with several times without issue. Today when I start the software there is no COM port to select. In the bottom left hand part of the KX3 PORT window is says Serial Port is Closed. (I?m using the Elecraft USB cable for the KX3). > > I can?t get it to work. I can control my Kx3 with DXLabs using the COM port no problem. I can use the Elecraft Frequency editor with no problem. I can use WinLink Express no problem. But when I start the KX3 utility software I can?t select a COM port ? there are none listed. > From donwilh at embarqmail.com Fri Apr 12 22:20:58 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 22:20:58 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: <1C.EE.29176.79C31BC5@mx04.onyx.dfw.sync.lan> References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234720.B507D149B275@mailman.qth.net> <1C.EE.29176.79C31BC5@mx04.onyx.dfw.sync.lan> Message-ID: <92db430c-82ec-57f7-1544-67948fa48c22@embarqmail.com> Hank, In that case, the next step is to download and install the latest copy of KX3 Utility. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/12/2019 9:34 PM, HB wrote: > > Don?. > > I have verified the COM port in the Device Manager but the KX3 Utility > does not show any COM ports in the port window. > > From rv6amark at yahoo.com Fri Apr 12 22:23:04 2019 From: rv6amark at yahoo.com (rv6amark) Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2019 19:23:04 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: <20190413013429.61DE3149B19C@mailman.qth.net> Message-ID: Hank,I had a similar problem earlier this week following a Windows update.? ?The COM port showed up in Device Manager, but the software? package I was using (not the KX3 Utility) couldn't talk to it.? Within a day or so, there was another Windows? update,? and then everything worked fine.Sometimes it seems like an update breaks something, and a follow on update fixes it.? Not the first time I've seen that happen.Mark,KE6BB -------- Original message --------From: HB Date: 4/12/19 6:34 PM (GMT-08:00) To: donwilh at embarqmail.com, Elecraft list Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed Don?.I have verified the COM port in the Device Manager but the KX3 Utility does not show any COM ports in the port window.HankK4HYJ From a.durbin at msn.com Sat Apr 13 08:52:41 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 12:52:41 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Prototype KPA500 monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I received a few off list replies and have updated the report to add the following: Note - the displayed results are for a test with a well matched dummy load. Efficiency and PA dissipation are dependent on frequency, output power, and the antenna system load. Higher dissipation and lower efficiency may be seen in normal operation. https://www.dropbox.com/s/bypkedec3v6j18r/Prototype%20KPA500%20Monitor%20rev%20a.pdf?dl=0 73, Andy, k3wyc From ki4txp at gmail.com Sat Apr 13 09:53:59 2019 From: ki4txp at gmail.com (JAY) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 09:53:59 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Transmit problem Digital Message-ID: Hello Again, This Om is still having a problem with TX . Windows 10 on a HP Envy I have tried to do everything that has been recommended with no luck. I am using Codec sound card for both TX and RX The RX has a slider that I can move. The TX has no slider and it is moving up the scale at about 15-20 (just a guess) no numbers show up. Trying to do FT8 I set the radio to Data and when I TX it switches to USB. I believe this is normal. PS SSB I am having no issues. Thanks again for any thoughts. -- 73 KI4TXP JAY From kevinr at coho.net Sun Apr 14 00:43:25 2019 From: kevinr at coho.net (kevinr) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:43:25 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Announcement Message-ID: <6e8272ad-833f-18d9-9e2c-4361a9a34c6a@coho.net> Good Evening, ?? More birds are returning and leaves are starting to appear. The deer I've not seen in months are right outside my window. They are taking advantage of the winds of last night.? Long strands of lichen which normally hang from the trees blow on to the ground and the deer eat it all.? I found out it is a large part of their diet.? No wonder it doesn't hang close to the ground. ?? The sun actually has experienced some B class flares from the large sunspot facing the earth.? It may effect propagation; hopefully in a good way. Please join us on: 14050 kHz at 2200z Sunday (3 PM PDT Sunday) ?7047 kHz at 0000z Monday (5 PM PDT Sunday) 73, Kevin. KD5ONS _ From dick at elecraft.com Sun Apr 14 00:47:09 2019 From: dick at elecraft.com (Dick Dievendorff) Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2019 21:47:09 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: <92db430c-82ec-57f7-1544-67948fa48c22@embarqmail.com> References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234720.B507D149B275@mailman.qth.net> <1C.EE.29176.79C31BC5@mx04.onyx.dfw.sync.lan> <92db430c-82ec-57f7-1544-67948fa48c22@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: The kx3 gets its inventory of com ports from registry values populated by complete device driver installation. Dick, K6KR > On Apr 12, 2019, at 19:20, Don Wilhelm wrote: > > Hank, > > In that case, the next step is to download and install the latest copy of KX3 Utility. > > > 73, > Don W3FPR > >> On 4/12/2019 9:34 PM, HB wrote: >> >> Don?. >> >> I have verified the COM port in the Device Manager but the KX3 Utility does not show any COM ports in the port window. >> >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From nskousen at ecsecurityinc.com Sun Apr 14 09:40:48 2019 From: nskousen at ecsecurityinc.com (Niel Skousen) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 07:40:48 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] AlexLoop FS Message-ID: Good Afternoon Gang, I am selling my AlexLoop with a small camera tripod. PayPal ok ( niel(dot)skousen(at)gmail.com ) will USPS next day Asking $325 conus, + actual freight for other shipping requests. Niel WA7SSA From hbjr at optilink.us Sun Apr 14 10:06:19 2019 From: hbjr at optilink.us (hbjr at optilink.us) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 10:06:19 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234720.B507D149B275@mailman.qth.net> <1C.EE.29176.79C31BC5@mx04.onyx.dfw.sync.lan> <92db430c-82ec-57f7-1544-67948fa48c22@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <008201d4f2cb$3b8d0ed0$b2a72c70$@optilink.us> Reinstalling the KX3 utility software from the Elecraft site did nothing. How can I check the registry values on the PC to know if that is the cause? Hank K4HYJ -----Original Message----- From: Dick Dievendorff Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 12:47 AM To: donwilh at embarqmail.com Cc: HB ; Elecraft list Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed The kx3 gets its inventory of com ports from registry values populated by complete device driver installation. Dick, K6KR > On Apr 12, 2019, at 19:20, Don Wilhelm wrote: > > Hank, > > In that case, the next step is to download and install the latest copy of KX3 Utility. > > > 73, > Don W3FPR > >> On 4/12/2019 9:34 PM, HB wrote: >> >> Don?. >> >> I have verified the COM port in the Device Manager but the KX3 Utility does not show any COM ports in the port window. >> >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From w0eb at cox.net Sun Apr 14 10:40:00 2019 From: w0eb at cox.net (Jim Sheldon) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 14:40:00 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: For Sale AADE LC Meter Message-ID: For Sale working and quite accurate AADE model IIb L/C Meter, the last version produced. The designer passed away in August of 2015 and this extremely nice L/C meter from "Almost All Digital Electronics" is no longer being made or readily available. Somehow I wound up with two of these and only need one on the workbench. I'm trying to amass enough funds to buy a larger 3D printer than the one my wife bought me for my recent birthday so am paring down a few items I no longer need in the shack. I believe these sold for around $105 new. The unit is in excellent working condition with only minor cosmetic marks on the faceplate and case. I'm asking $85 shipped anywhere in the US & posessions and a printed version of the manual will be included. PayPal preferred. Please contact me off the reflector to say you want it or for further information. Photo available on request. First "I'll take it" or reasonable facimile gets right of first refusal based on date/time of the sender's email message. Jim Sheldon, W0EB Park City, KS email w0eb (at) cox dot net From pa3a at xs4all.nl Sun Apr 14 10:49:22 2019 From: pa3a at xs4all.nl (Arie Kleingeld PA3A) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 16:49:22 +0200 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 no TX, no RX, and solved Message-ID: Just for sharing. Case: K3 #1255 (loaded) Has all mods during the years and upgrades to K3(s) except for USB port Problem: no TX and no RX (not on main, not on sub) Analysis: 1. Connecting a panadapter on the IF out: IF signal of main RX is there and and signals are where they should be, so VCO of main RX (as first oscillator) is working all right 2. The two pre-amps, attenuator, and antenna switches working fine (checked on panadapter) 3. RF gain to minimum moves S-meter to max on Main- and Sub-RX (normal) 4. All RX DSP functions seem to work on the little noise that is audible 5. Audio spectrum analyser connected at audio output shows that IF filters do not influence the audio bandwidth, only the DSP does. (fiddled with the filtersettings in the K3 utility) Conclusion: There's a hick-up between the 8.2MHz IF and the entrance to the DSP, seems like 2nd IF of 15kHz is down. No mixing signal form 8.2MHz to 15kHz? That one sits on the KREF3, where all those TMP-cables come together. Checking the reflector... Found this line: 'TMP-cables are a class by itself' , and indeed it is so.? :-) Repair: Refitting all TMP-cables Result: K3 is playing as normal again and PA3A is a happy man. (By the way, this is not the first time in the life of #1255 that its TMP-cables needed a little push.) Cheers and 73 to all, Arie Kleingeld PA3A From w0eb at cox.net Sun Apr 14 11:05:04 2019 From: w0eb at cox.net (Jim Sheldon) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 15:05:04 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: For Sale AADE LC Meter SPOKEN FOR In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The AADE IIb L/C meter has been spoken for. That was fast -=- 12 minutes from the time I posted it to receipt of an "I'll Take It" message. ------ Original Message ------ From: "Jim Sheldon" To: "elecraft at mailman.qth.net" Sent: 4/14/2019 9:40:00 AM Subject: [Elecraft] OT: For Sale AADE LC Meter >For Sale working and quite accurate AADE model IIb L/C Meter, the last version produced. The designer passed away in August of 2015 and this extremely nice L/C meter from "Almost All Digital Electronics" is no longer being made or readily available. > From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sun Apr 14 11:09:16 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 11:09:16 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: <008201d4f2cb$3b8d0ed0$b2a72c70$@optilink.us> References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234720.B507D149B275@mailman.qth.net> <1C.EE.29176.79C31BC5@mx04.onyx.dfw.sync.lan> <92db430c-82ec-57f7-1544-67948fa48c22@embarqmail.com> <008201d4f2cb$3b8d0ed0$b2a72c70$@optilink.us> Message-ID: <31b56e09-d056-e228-b6af-1c21ff3da977@embarqmail.com> Hank, Installing KX3 Utility will do nothing for changing what your computer does about COM Ports vs USB port assignment.? It is now apparent that your computer is not properly recognizing the FTDI USB to Serial adapter. Download and install the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website. What you are trying to deal with is an FTDI USB to Serial adapter.? Just because the KXUSB cable is sold by Elecraft does not change that fact - the FTDI chipset is not an Elecraft device, but an FTDI device even though it is included in the KXUSB. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/14/2019 10:06 AM, hbjr at optilink.us wrote: > Reinstalling the KX3 utility software from the Elecraft site did nothing. > > How can I check the registry values on the PC to know if that is the cause? > > Hank > K4HYJ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dick Dievendorff > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 12:47 AM > To: donwilh at embarqmail.com > Cc: HB ; Elecraft list > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed > > The kx3 gets its inventory of com ports from registry values populated by complete device driver installation. > > Dick, K6KR > > From bud73 at comcast.net Sun Apr 14 11:48:24 2019 From: bud73 at comcast.net (Bud) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 11:48:24 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Just wondering Message-ID: I am interested in learning the year that the K2 was introduced into the Amateur Radio market. And, what is the approximate year K2 s/n 2514 was shipped? Thanks to the Elecraft historian(s) that can answer my questions. Bud ? NY1Z From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sun Apr 14 12:23:41 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 12:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Just wondering In-Reply-To: <20190414154910.24BBA149B2B9@mailman.qth.net> References: <20190414154910.24BBA149B2B9@mailman.qth.net> Message-ID: <4de2fbe7-b475-37c5-afab-8ec81bb49fb6@embarqmail.com> Bud, The Field Test of the K2 started in late 1998 and ended in 1999 (I believe May) with the first production K2. I would assume SN 2514 was shipped about 2002. That is a Rev A K2, and if not installed, would benefit from the A to B upgrades. The boards were re-done to REV B to incorporate all the prior upgrade mods at SN 3000. A serial number 2514 would have to be physically instected to determine which upgrades (different from options) have been installed. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/14/2019 11:48 AM, Bud wrote: > I am interested in learning the year that the K2 was introduced into the Amateur Radio market. > And, what is the approximate year K2 s/n 2514 was shipped? > Thanks to the Elecraft historian(s) that can answer my questions. > From hbjr at optilink.us Sun Apr 14 12:46:48 2019 From: hbjr at optilink.us (HB) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 12:46:48 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: <31b56e09-d056-e228-b6af-1c21ff3da977@embarqmail.com> References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234720.B507D149B275@mailman.qth.net> <1C.EE.29176.79C31BC5@mx04.onyx.dfw.sync.lan> <92db430c-82ec-57f7-1544-67948fa48c22@embarqmail.com> <008201d4f2cb$3b8d0ed0$b2a72c70$@optilink.us> <31b56e09-d056-e228-b6af-1c21ff3da977@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: I have done all of those things and no change. As I said every other piece of software that needs the KXUSB grabs it and uses it fine ? just not the utility software. There is something to the driver installation ? it shows as incomplete, but reinstalling the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website still does not fix the problem. There is still an event message saying that the installation did not complete. I realizer this is not an Elecraft issue, I?m just looking for help. Hank K4HYJ From: Don Wilhelm Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 11:09 AM To: hbjr at optilink.us; 'Dick Dievendorff' Cc: 'Elecraft list' Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed Hank, Installing KX3 Utility will do nothing for changing what your computer does about COM Ports vs USB port assignment.? It is now apparent that your computer is not properly recognizing the FTDI USB to Serial adapter. Download and install the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website. What you are trying to deal with is an FTDI USB to Serial adapter.? Just because the KXUSB cable is sold by Elecraft does not change that fact - the FTDI chipset is not an Elecraft device, but an FTDI device even though it is included in the KXUSB. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/14/2019 10:06 AM, hbjr at optilink.us wrote: > Reinstalling the KX3 utility software from the Elecraft site did nothing. > > How can I check the registry values on the PC to know if that is the cause? > > Hank > K4HYJ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dick Dievendorff > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 12:47 AM > To: donwilh at embarqmail.com > Cc: HB ; Elecraft list > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed > > The kx3 gets its inventory of com ports from registry values populated by complete device driver installation. > > Dick, K6KR > > From elecraft.list at videotron.ca Sun Apr 14 13:17:40 2019 From: elecraft.list at videotron.ca (Tom) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 13:17:40 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234720.B507D149B275@mailman.qth.net> <1C.EE.29176.79C31BC5@mx04.onyx.dfw.sync.lan> <92db430c-82ec-57f7-1544-67948fa48c22@embarqmail.com> <008201d4f2cb$3b8d0ed0$b2a72c70$@optilink.us> <31b56e09-d056-e228-b6af-1c21ff3da977@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <000001d4f2e5$f7d98f90$e78caeb0$@videotron.ca> Hi, Sometimes driver software can be a pain... Try this. 1) Open the device manager and select the comport by right clicking on it. 2) Check the box to delete the driver software and uninstall. 3) Unplug the USB cable. 4) Reboot 5) Next run the FTDI driver installation. When prompted or when complete, plug the USB cable back in. Sometimes, windows will keep reinstalling the same driver if the files have not been deleted. 73 Tom va2fsq.com -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB Sent: April 14, 2019 12:47 PM To: donwilh at embarqmail.com; 'Dick Dievendorff' Cc: 'Elecraft list' Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed I have done all of those things and no change. As I said every other piece of software that needs the KXUSB grabs it and uses it fine ? just not the utility software. There is something to the driver installation ? it shows as incomplete, but reinstalling the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website still does not fix the problem. There is still an event message saying that the installation did not complete. I realizer this is not an Elecraft issue, I?m just looking for help. Hank K4HYJ From: Don Wilhelm Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 11:09 AM To: hbjr at optilink.us; 'Dick Dievendorff' Cc: 'Elecraft list' Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed Hank, Installing KX3 Utility will do nothing for changing what your computer does about COM Ports vs USB port assignment. It is now apparent that your computer is not properly recognizing the FTDI USB to Serial adapter. Download and install the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website. What you are trying to deal with is an FTDI USB to Serial adapter. Just because the KXUSB cable is sold by Elecraft does not change that fact - the FTDI chipset is not an Elecraft device, but an FTDI device even though it is included in the KXUSB. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/14/2019 10:06 AM, hbjr at optilink.us wrote: > Reinstalling the KX3 utility software from the Elecraft site did nothing. > > How can I check the registry values on the PC to know if that is the cause? > > Hank > K4HYJ > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dick Dievendorff > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 12:47 AM > To: donwilh at embarqmail.com > Cc: HB ; Elecraft list > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed > > The kx3 gets its inventory of com ports from registry values populated by complete device driver installation. > > Dick, K6KR > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From c-hawley at illinois.edu Sun Apr 14 13:20:18 2019 From: c-hawley at illinois.edu (hawley, charles j jr) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 17:20:18 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Just wondering In-Reply-To: <20190414154908.A6600149B044@mailman.qth.net> References: <20190414154908.A6600149B044@mailman.qth.net> Message-ID: I bought #1089 in March2000. Chuck KE9UW c-hawley at illinois.edu Sent from my iPad > On Apr 14, 2019, at 10:49 AM, Bud wrote: > > I am interested in learning the year that the K2 was introduced into the Amateur Radio market. > And, what is the approximate year K2 s/n 2514 was shipped? > Thanks to the Elecraft historian(s) that can answer my questions. > > Bud ? > NY1Z > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From nskousen at ecsecurityinc.com Sun Apr 14 13:20:14 2019 From: nskousen at ecsecurityinc.com (Niel Skousen) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 11:20:14 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] [QRP-L] AlexLoop FS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sorry for bad grammar Gang; I will send via USPS Flat Rate, the day after payment. Some one thought I was saying I?d use Next Day shipping - not so ... Niel WA7SSA Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 14, 2019, at 07:40, Niel Skousen wrote: > > Good Afternoon Gang, > > I am selling my AlexLoop with a small camera tripod. > PayPal ok ( niel(dot)skousen(at)gmail.com ) will USPS next day > > Asking $325 conus, + actual freight for other shipping requests. > > Niel > WA7SSA > ______________________________________________________________ > QRP-L mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qrp-l > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:QRP-L at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > Message delivered to nskousen at talisman-intl.com From kenk3iu at cox.net Sun Apr 14 13:48:04 2019 From: kenk3iu at cox.net (Ken K3IU) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 13:48:04 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Just wondering In-Reply-To: <20190414154909.2E439149B2AE@mailman.qth.net> References: <20190414154909.2E439149B2AE@mailman.qth.net> Message-ID: <77b2b0fb-7869-20ee-2c6d-df3869a6ed9c@cox.net> I built #2888 in Oct 2002. Ken K3IU ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ On 4/14/2019 11:48 AM, Bud wrote: > I am interested in learning the year that the K2 was introduced into the Amateur Radio market. > And, what is the approximate year K2 s/n 2514 was shipped? > Thanks to the Elecraft historian(s) that can answer my questions. > > Bud ? > NY1Z > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From edauer at law.du.edu Sun Apr 14 14:08:54 2019 From: edauer at law.du.edu (Dauer, Edward) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 18:08:54 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] X3 Utility problem: serial port is closed Message-ID: Hank, I cannot offer any technical help but I can offer empathy, be it ever so OT. I often have the same problem with N1MM. Some days it finds a port; some days it doesn't. There is no correlation that I can discern with anything I do -- including cussing, fiddling, supplication, offering to negotiate, lunar phases, making contributions to charitable causes, turning devices on and off . . . I am convinced the digital world has escaped its creators and created an unruly universe of its own. Hamlet was prescient: "There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy." In bocca al lupo, Ted, KN1CBR -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB Sent: April 14, 2019 12:47 PM To: donwilh at embarqmail.com; 'Dick Dievendorff' Cc: 'Elecraft list' Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed I have done all of those things and no change. As I said every other piece of software that needs the KXUSB grabs it and uses it fine ? just not the utility software. There is something to the driver installation ? it shows as incomplete, but reinstalling the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website still does not fix the problem. There is still an event message saying that the installation did not complete. I realizer this is not an Elecraft issue, I?m just looking for help. Hank K4HYJ From Andy at rickham.net Sun Apr 14 14:38:41 2019 From: Andy at rickham.net (Andy McMullin) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 19:38:41 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: <000001d4f2e5$f7d98f90$e78caeb0$@videotron.ca> References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234720.B507D149B275@mailman.qth.net> <1C.EE.29176.79C31BC5@mx04.onyx.dfw.sync.lan> <92db430c-82ec-57f7-1544-67948fa48c22@embarqmail.com> <008201d4f2cb$3b8d0ed0$b2a72c70$@optilink.us> <31b56e09-d056-e228-b6af-1c21ff3da977@embarqmail.com> <000001d4f2e5$f7d98f90$e78caeb0$@videotron.ca> Message-ID: <97FB1566-4F16-41CF-9EAD-799A9DB13467@rickham.net> Can I just add that at the stage that says reboot, you should really shut down the machine, wait a bit, then Restart. Sometimes a USB port is not physically but just logically reset by a reboot. I hope this helps Regards Andy, G8TQH Sent from my iPhone > On 14 Apr 2019, at 18:17, Tom wrote: > > Hi, > Sometimes driver software can be a pain... > Try this. > 1) Open the device manager and select the comport by right clicking on it. > 2) Check the box to delete the driver software and uninstall. > 3) Unplug the USB cable. > 4) Reboot > 5) Next run the FTDI driver installation. When prompted or when complete, plug the USB cable back in. > Sometimes, windows will keep reinstalling the same driver if the files have not been deleted. > 73 Tom > va2fsq.com > > > -----Original Message----- > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB > Sent: April 14, 2019 12:47 PM > To: donwilh at embarqmail.com; 'Dick Dievendorff' > Cc: 'Elecraft list' > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed > > I have done all of those things and no change. As I said every other piece of software that needs the KXUSB grabs it and uses it fine ? just not the utility software. > > There is something to the driver installation ? it shows as incomplete, but reinstalling the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website still does not fix the problem. There is still an event message saying that the installation did not complete. > > I realizer this is not an Elecraft issue, I?m just looking for help. > > Hank > K4HYJ > > From: Don Wilhelm > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 11:09 AM > To: hbjr at optilink.us; 'Dick Dievendorff' > Cc: 'Elecraft list' > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed > > Hank, > > Installing KX3 Utility will do nothing for changing what your computer does about COM Ports vs USB port assignment. It is now apparent that your computer is not properly recognizing the FTDI USB to Serial adapter. > > Download and install the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website. > What you are trying to deal with is an FTDI USB to Serial adapter. Just because the KXUSB cable is sold by Elecraft does not change that fact - the FTDI chipset is not an Elecraft device, but an FTDI device even though it is included in the KXUSB. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > >> On 4/14/2019 10:06 AM, hbjr at optilink.us wrote: >> Reinstalling the KX3 utility software from the Elecraft site did nothing. >> >> How can I check the registry values on the PC to know if that is the cause? >> >> Hank >> K4HYJ >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Dick Dievendorff >> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 12:47 AM >> To: donwilh at embarqmail.com >> Cc: HB ; Elecraft list >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >> >> The kx3 gets its inventory of com ports from registry values populated by complete device driver installation. >> >> Dick, K6KR >> >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From nr4c at widomaker.com Sun Apr 14 15:29:58 2019 From: nr4c at widomaker.com (Nr4c) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 15:29:58 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: <97FB1566-4F16-41CF-9EAD-799A9DB13467@rickham.net> References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234720.B507D149B275@mailman.qth.net> <1C.EE.29176.79C31BC5@mx04.onyx.dfw.sync.lan> <92db430c-82ec-57f7-1544-67948fa48c22@embarqmail.com> <008201d4f2cb$3b8d0ed0$b2a72c70$@optilink.us> <31b56e09-d056-e228-b6af-1c21ff3da977@embarqmail.com> <000001d4f2e5$f7d98f90$e78caeb0$@videotron.ca> <97FB1566-4F16-41CF-9EAD-799A9DB13467@rickham.net> Message-ID: <7BC25936-DC90-40BC-98A4-88FEE973FD4C@widomaker.com> On the FTDI site there is a removal tool. Use it to wipe away com port drivers. Then re-install the FTDI drivers for your KUSB or KXUSB cable. Good luck! Sent from my iPhone ...nr4c. bill > On Apr 14, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Andy McMullin via Elecraft wrote: > > Can I just add that at the stage that says reboot, you should really shut down the machine, wait a bit, then > Restart. Sometimes a USB port is not physically but just logically reset by a reboot. > > I hope this helps > > Regards > Andy, G8TQH > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 14 Apr 2019, at 18:17, Tom wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Sometimes driver software can be a pain... >> Try this. >> 1) Open the device manager and select the comport by right clicking on it. >> 2) Check the box to delete the driver software and uninstall. >> 3) Unplug the USB cable. >> 4) Reboot >> 5) Next run the FTDI driver installation. When prompted or when complete, plug the USB cable back in. >> Sometimes, windows will keep reinstalling the same driver if the files have not been deleted. >> 73 Tom >> va2fsq.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB >> Sent: April 14, 2019 12:47 PM >> To: donwilh at embarqmail.com; 'Dick Dievendorff' >> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >> >> I have done all of those things and no change. As I said every other piece of software that needs the KXUSB grabs it and uses it fine ? just not the utility software. >> >> There is something to the driver installation ? it shows as incomplete, but reinstalling the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website still does not fix the problem. There is still an event message saying that the installation did not complete. >> >> I realizer this is not an Elecraft issue, I?m just looking for help. >> >> Hank >> K4HYJ >> >> From: Don Wilhelm >> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 11:09 AM >> To: hbjr at optilink.us; 'Dick Dievendorff' >> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >> >> Hank, >> >> Installing KX3 Utility will do nothing for changing what your computer does about COM Ports vs USB port assignment. It is now apparent that your computer is not properly recognizing the FTDI USB to Serial adapter. >> >> Download and install the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website. >> What you are trying to deal with is an FTDI USB to Serial adapter. Just because the KXUSB cable is sold by Elecraft does not c From hbjr at optilink.us Sun Apr 14 22:17:13 2019 From: hbjr at optilink.us (HB) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 22:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: <7BC25936-DC90-40BC-98A4-88FEE973FD4C@widomaker.com> References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234720.B507D149B275@mailman.qth.net> <1C.EE.29176.79C31BC5@mx04.onyx.dfw.sync.lan> <92db430c-82ec-57f7-1544-67948fa48c22@embarqmail.com> <008201d4f2cb$3b8d0ed0$b2a72c70$@optilink.us> <31b56e09-d056-e228-b6af-1c21ff3da977@embarqmail.com> <000001d4f2e5$f7d98f90$e78caeb0$@videotron.ca> <97FB1566-4F16-41CF-9EAD-799A9DB13467@rickham.net> <7BC25936-DC90-40BC-98A4-88FEE973FD4C@widomaker.com> Message-ID: Okay?some weirdness, but I can get the software to work. Here is what I have done (some help from you guys, some help from the IT guys where I work, and the internet). It?s a little complex? Configuration 1: My laptop is connected via USB to a PK-232SC+ which has a 2 port USB hub built in ? my KXUSB is plugged in there. Under this configuration, no joy with the KX3 Utility recognizing the COM port. Configuration 2: My laptop is connected to the KX3 directly via USB port. Under this configuration, no joy with the KX3 Utility recognizing the COM port. Configuration 3: My laptop is connected to the KX3 directly via USB port. Under COM port settings for the KX3USB connected port, I changed the latency timer to 8 ms from 16 ms. Under this configuration, the KX3 Utility recognizes the COM port every time. Returning to configuration one with the lower latency timer setting does not allow the KX3 utility to see the com port, so no joy there. BUT ? it?s a weird BUT ? If I connect the KXUSB directly to the laptop, open the utility and connect, disconnect the KX3USB from the laptop and connect it to the hub built in to the PK-232sc+, it works as long as I don?t exit the KX3 utility software. I can even close the serial port in the software, BUT as long as I don?t exit the software, I can reopen the serial port and it works fine. I can close the port and use other software that needs the KXUSB as long as I don?t exit the KX3 utility program (just leave it minimized) it works when I need it. How crazy is that? Any gurus figure that one out?? Hank K4HYJ From: Nr4c Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 3:31 PM To: Andy McMullin Cc: Elecraft list Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed On the FTDI site there is a removal tool. Use it to wipe away com port drivers. Then re-install the FTDI drivers for your KUSB or KXUSB cable. Good luck! Sent from my iPhone ...nr4c. bill > On Apr 14, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Andy McMullin via Elecraft wrote: > > Can I just add that at the stage that says reboot, you should really shut down the machine, wait a bit, then > Restart. Sometimes a USB port is not physically but just logically reset by a reboot. > > I hope this helps > > Regards > Andy, G8TQH > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 14 Apr 2019, at 18:17, Tom wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Sometimes driver software can be a pain... >> Try this. >> 1) Open the device manager and select the comport by right clicking on it. >> 2) Check the box to delete the driver software and uninstall. >> 3) Unplug the USB cable. >> 4) Reboot >> 5) Next run the FTDI driver installation. When prompted or when complete, plug the USB cable back in. >> Sometimes, windows will keep reinstalling the same driver if the files have not been deleted. >> 73 Tom >> va2fsq.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB >> Sent: April 14, 2019 12:47 PM >> To: donwilh at embarqmail.com; 'Dick Dievendorff' >> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >> >> I have done all of those things and no change. As I said every other piece of software that needs the KXUSB grabs it and uses it fine ? just not the utility software. >> >> There is something to the driver installation ? it shows as incomplete, but reinstalling the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website still does not fix the problem. There is still an event message saying that the installation did not complete. >> >> I realizer this is not an Elecraft issue, I?m just looking for help. >> >> Hank >> K4HYJ >> >> From: Don Wilhelm >> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 11:09 AM >> To: hbjr at optilink.us; 'Dick Dievendorff' >> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >> >> Hank, >> >> Installing KX3 Utility will do nothing for changing what your computer does about COM Ports vs USB port assignment. It is now apparent that your computer is not properly recognizing the FTDI USB to Serial adapter. >> >> Download and install the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website. >> What you are trying to deal with is an FTDI USB to Serial adapter. Just because the KXUSB cable is sold by Elecraft does not c ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From Gary at ka1j.com Sun Apr 14 22:45:17 2019 From: Gary at ka1j.com (Gary Smith) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 22:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] WTB: KAT3A tuner Module Message-ID: <5CB3F03D.6451.13E3EB30@Gary.ka1j.com> A follow-up; While I still would like to buy an excess KAT3A for my K3 & if you have one, please contact me off-list. It turns out my KAT3A is now working perfectly at this time Before I packed it up to send back for repair I looked at the socket and noticed they were not gold pins, only the male pins on the main board are gold. I doubt there would be corrosion so soon but what's to lose? I dripped some Deoxit 100 in and let it set a few minutes, then squirted regular 15% deoxit with its 85% lube, cleaned and reinstalled it. The KAT3A is now working perfectly on 160 again and as before, all the other bands are also working. I emailed Elecraft to let them know I don't need the RMA and won't be sending it in. Glad they were there and willing had I needed to get it repaired. 73 all, Gary KA1J > Looks like I need a replacement KAT3A > tuner. Weighing the cost of > repair/replacement, I wonder if anyone has > one that they did not use, are not > needing? > > If so, please contact me off list with the > details. > > 73, > > Gary > KA1J > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From k9yeq at live.com Sun Apr 14 22:46:49 2019 From: k9yeq at live.com (Bill Johnson) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:46:49 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: <20190415021723.DB900149B2C6@mailman.qth.net> References: <1CB865AB-B6A3-4C95-A740-DBC98D373564@gmail.com> <20190412234720.B507D149B275@mailman.qth.net> <1C.EE.29176.79C31BC5@mx04.onyx.dfw.sync.lan> <92db430c-82ec-57f7-1544-67948fa48c22@embarqmail.com> <008201d4f2cb$3b8d0ed0$b2a72c70$@optilink.us> <31b56e09-d056-e228-b6af-1c21ff3da977@embarqmail.com> <000001d4f2e5$f7d98f90$e78caeb0$@videotron.ca> <97FB1566-4F16-41CF-9EAD-799A9DB13467@rickham.net> <7BC25936-DC90-40BC-98A4-88FEE973FD4C@widomaker.com>, <20190415021723.DB900149B2C6@mailman.qth.net> Message-ID: Do you have a desktop virus? A major cause of what you are experiencing.? Bill 920-421-1172 ________________________________ From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of HB Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 9:17:13 PM To: Nr4c; Andy McMullin Cc: Elecraft list Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed Okay?some weirdness, but I can get the software to work. Here is what I have done (some help from you guys, some help from the IT guys where I work, and the internet). It?s a little complex? Configuration 1: My laptop is connected via USB to a PK-232SC+ which has a 2 port USB hub built in ? my KXUSB is plugged in there. Under this configuration, no joy with the KX3 Utility recognizing the COM port. Configuration 2: My laptop is connected to the KX3 directly via USB port. Under this configuration, no joy with the KX3 Utility recognizing the COM port. Configuration 3: My laptop is connected to the KX3 directly via USB port. Under COM port settings for the KX3USB connected port, I changed the latency timer to 8 ms from 16 ms. Under this configuration, the KX3 Utility recognizes the COM port every time. Returning to configuration one with the lower latency timer setting does not allow the KX3 utility to see the com port, so no joy there. BUT ? it?s a weird BUT ? If I connect the KXUSB directly to the laptop, open the utility and connect, disconnect the KX3USB from the laptop and connect it to the hub built in to the PK-232sc+, it works as long as I don?t exit the KX3 utility software. I can even close the serial port in the software, BUT as long as I don?t exit the software, I can reopen the serial port and it works fine. I can close the port and use other software that needs the KXUSB as long as I don?t exit the KX3 utility program (just leave it minimized) it works when I need it. How crazy is that? Any gurus figure that one out?? Hank K4HYJ From: Nr4c Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 3:31 PM To: Andy McMullin Cc: Elecraft list Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed On the FTDI site there is a removal tool. Use it to wipe away com port drivers. Then re-install the FTDI drivers for your KUSB or KXUSB cable. Good luck! Sent from my iPhone ...nr4c. bill > On Apr 14, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Andy McMullin via Elecraft wrote: > > Can I just add that at the stage that says reboot, you should really shut down the machine, wait a bit, then > Restart. Sometimes a USB port is not physically but just logically reset by a reboot. > > I hope this helps > > Regards > Andy, G8TQH > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 14 Apr 2019, at 18:17, Tom wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Sometimes driver software can be a pain... >> Try this. >> 1) Open the device manager and select the comport by right clicking on it. >> 2) Check the box to delete the driver software and uninstall. >> 3) Unplug the USB cable. >> 4) Reboot >> 5) Next run the FTDI driver installation. When prompted or when complete, plug the USB cable back in. >> Sometimes, windows will keep reinstalling the same driver if the files have not been deleted. >> 73 Tom >> va2fsq.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB >> Sent: April 14, 2019 12:47 PM >> To: donwilh at embarqmail.com; 'Dick Dievendorff' >> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >> >> I have done all of those things and no change. As I said every other piece of software that needs the KXUSB grabs it and uses it fine ? just not the utility software. >> >> There is something to the driver installation ? it shows as incomplete, but reinstalling the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website still does not fix the problem. There is still an event message saying that the installation did not complete. >> >> I realizer this is not an Elecraft issue, I?m just looking for help. >> >> Hank >> K4HYJ >> >> From: Don Wilhelm >> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 11:09 AM >> To: hbjr at optilink.us; 'Dick Dievendorff' >> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >> >> Hank, >> >> Installing KX3 Utility will do nothing for changing what your computer does about COM Ports vs USB port assignment. It is now apparent that your computer is not properly recognizing the FTDI USB to Serial adapter. >> >> Download and install the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website. >> What you are trying to deal with is an FTDI USB to Serial adapter. Just because the KXUSB cable is sold by Elecraft does not c ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From kevinr at coho.net Sun Apr 14 23:17:57 2019 From: kevinr at coho.net (kevinr) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 20:17:57 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report Message-ID: <2914c997-5abd-e2d2-6bdb-fb8de640221c@coho.net> Good Evening, ?? Propagation was better this week.? Plenty of noise and QSB but at least signals were present.? S0 to S5 with decent copy.? I did not hear any thunderstorms.? Cool weather reports for the most part.? Lots of yard work and clean up.? Antenna projects will get pushed off for a little while.? I wonder if raising one while there are thousands of biting flies improves propagation as much as inclement weather does.? May have to experiment and take notes. ? On 14049.5 ? kHz at 2200z: W0CZ - Ken - ND K4TO - Dave - KY K4JPN - Steve - GA K0DTJ - Brian - CA ? On 7048 kHz at 0000z: WM5F - Dwight - ID K0DTJ - Brian - CA K6PJV - Dale - CA AE6JV - Bill - CA K4TO - Dave - KY Until next week 73, ?? Kevin.? KD5ONS RIP Harlan Ellison? 1934 - 2019 _ From k2vco.vic at gmail.com Mon Apr 15 00:05:16 2019 From: k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:05:16 +0300 Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia? Message-ID: <5739a8f2-4bbb-05cf-ed15-f8b41a36a82f@gmail.com> Did Elecraft show or hint at anything interesting at the Visalia DX Convention? -- 73, Victor, 4X6GP Rehovot, Israel Formerly K2VCO CWops no. 5 http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ From frantz at pwpconsult.com Mon Apr 15 01:18:52 2019 From: frantz at pwpconsult.com (Bill Frantz) Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 22:18:52 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia? In-Reply-To: <5739a8f2-4bbb-05cf-ed15-f8b41a36a82f@gmail.com> Message-ID: No. There were the usual show special deals and the KPA1500 was emphasized. The whole conference, including the vendor area, was fairly low key, with nothing new and earth shattering. 73 Bill AE6JV On 4/15/19 at 9:05 PM, k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP) wrote: >Did Elecraft show or hint at anything interesting at the >Visalia DX Convention? ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | I don't have high-speed | Periwinkle (408)356-8506 | internet. I have DSL. | 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com | | Los Gatos, CA 95032 From indians at xsmail.com Mon Apr 15 03:44:27 2019 From: indians at xsmail.com (Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 00:44:27 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] [K1] TX part sick Message-ID: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Hi all, I am trying to repair the son's K1 where the TX seems to be sick. (receiver sounds hot and quite nice on both bands 40/20m) I found several C0G caps around the cores on the module board burned as same as K1 relay so I replaced them all after long time searching them on the market (EU). Now I am trying to check step by step according to manual the RF board (RF 2000 Rev.D) and I found that original builder (we did not built it) wound 5 turns of secondary T3 (green wire) instead of 4 described in manual. Should I remove the turn from T3 or is it possible to adjust the TX even with that mistake? I would like to avoid another burns... Many thanks, ----- 73 - Petr, OK1RP "Apple & Elecraft freak" B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com G+:http://goo.gl/w3u2s9 G+: http://goo.gl/gP99xq -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From donwilh at embarqmail.com Mon Apr 15 09:42:39 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:42:39 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] [K1] TX part sick In-Reply-To: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Petr, The number of turns on T4 is not likely to make much of a difference, but I recommend correcting it just the same. However, it is an indicator that there may be other toroids in that K1 with an extra turn on them, so check all of them. As for the transmit problem, it is only a guess for what may be wrong - the best answer if "anything" in the TX chain. The best way to approach that problem is to turn to the back of the manual and do the Transmit Signal Tracing to determine which stage is failing. It sounds like that K1 may have experience a lightning event (the burned capacitors are an indicator of that), so you may have multiple failures. Work them one at a time. Correct each one in turn and re-test after each correction. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/15/2019 3:44 AM, Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS wrote: > Hi all, > > I am trying to repair the son's K1 where the TX seems to be sick. (receiver > sounds hot and quite nice on both bands 40/20m) > > I found several C0G caps around the cores on the module board burned as same > as K1 relay so I replaced them all after long time searching them on the > market (EU). > > Now I am trying to check step by step according to manual the RF board (RF > 2000 Rev.D) and I found that original builder (we did not built it) wound 5 > turns of secondary T3 (green wire) instead of 4 described in manual. > > Should I remove the turn from T3 or is it possible to adjust the TX even > with that mistake? > I would like to avoid another burns... > From turnbull at net1.ie Mon Apr 15 10:03:43 2019 From: turnbull at net1.ie (Doug Turnbull) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:03:43 -0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question In-Reply-To: References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Dear OMs and YLs, I am going to help a friend get onto FT8. He has a new Tigertronics SignaLink, with the header for the K3 and appropriate cables for the K3. This however does not in and of itself provide the ability to shift band or frequency in the case of Fox Hound mode. Is it correct to say that a cable from the K3 RS232 port possibly via the P3 to the PC is all that is required to gain this frequency shifting capability. The software being used other than what comes with the SignaLink is standard WSJTX Version 2.? from K1JT's stable. I use FT8 some here but have a MicroKeyer II. This is my first time using a SignaLink. Your guidance is appreciated. Thank you in advance. 73 Doug EI2CN From turnbull at net1.ie Mon Apr 15 10:08:35 2019 From: turnbull at net1.ie (Doug Turnbull) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 14:08:35 -0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA 1500 CE Approval In-Reply-To: References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Dear OMs and YLs, I looked up the KPA 1500 the other day on my phone and though I saw it was CE approved. Since then, I can not find this CE statement. Does the KPA 1500 finally have CE approval so that it can now be purchased into the EU? I have been waiting for this news for some time as I plan to buy. 73 Doug EI2CN PS For those outside the EU, CE approval is somewhat akin to UL approval. A product can not be sold in the EU without this safety approval. From indians at xsmail.com Mon Apr 15 10:24:39 2019 From: indians at xsmail.com (Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:24:39 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] [K1] TX part sick In-Reply-To: References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1555338279641-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Don, many thanks for hints. I will re-check all cores on RF board as same as on band module... We got this K1 in "repair needs" state from friend and the receiver sounds nice at the moment. So I would like to finish the repairing of TX path which burned to builder probably during alignment. I will let you know... at this moment I checked on RF board that T4 is wounded ok (not nice but correct) but T3 has more turns on secondary winding side. I will check all others to be sure there is no more mistakes. I do not know if the final transistor survived the last action > but we will see. MNI TNX, 73 Petr ----- 73 - Petr, OK1RP "Apple & Elecraft freak" B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com G+:http://goo.gl/w3u2s9 G+: http://goo.gl/gP99xq -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From donwilh at embarqmail.com Mon Apr 15 10:40:10 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:40:10 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question In-Reply-To: References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Doug, The SignaLink has both a soundcard and a USB to Serial port adapter. Be certain that the proper COM port and soundcard are selected in the data mode application. The K3 RS232 menu parameter should be set to 38400 and that same rate available in the COM port and the software application. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/15/2019 10:03 AM, Doug Turnbull wrote: > Dear OMs and YLs, > I am going to help a friend get onto FT8. He has a new Tigertronics > SignaLink, with the header for the K3 and appropriate cables for the K3. > This however does not in and of itself provide the ability to shift band or > frequency in the case of Fox Hound mode. > > Is it correct to say that a cable from the K3 RS232 port possibly via > the P3 to the PC is all that is required to gain this frequency shifting > capability. The software being used other than what comes with the > SignaLink is standard WSJTX Version 2.? from K1JT's stable. > From wt3igene at gmail.com Mon Apr 15 10:50:00 2019 From: wt3igene at gmail.com (Gene) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:50:00 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S for Sale Message-ID: Newly built K3S 100w w/ATU. No issues. Mint Contact off list. WT3i From hbjr at optilink.us Mon Apr 15 11:10:23 2019 From: hbjr at optilink.us (Hank) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:10:23 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: <109921956.760780.1555330939745@mail.yahoo.com> References: <109921956.760780.1555330939745.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <109921956.760780.1555330939745@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Ray... I did not realize that!? I did RTFM - I promise.? I guessed I missed that one. It has worked under the 1st configuration ever since I bought the KX3.? One day it changed - I was blaming a Windows update. My K3s is connected to a USB hub external to my desktop PC and works OK - Of course, the K3s is a USB device. Mystery solved!! Hank K4HYJ -----Original Message----- From: "Raymond Sills" To: hbjr at optilink.us Date: 04/15/19 08:22 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed Hi Hank: It's always been the case when using the Elecraft Utility, that you need to connect the rig directly to your computer, using the Elecraft cable.... with no other devices in line. ?That's why you succeeded with case 3. :) 73 de Ray K2ULR KX3 #211 -----Original Message----- From: HB To: Nr4c ; Andy McMullin Cc: Elecraft list Sent: Sun, Apr 14, 2019 10:17 pm Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed Okay?some weirdness, but I can get the software to work.? Here is what I have done (some help from you guys, some help from the IT guys where I work, and the internet).? It's a little complex? Configuration 1: My laptop is connected via USB to a PK-232SC+ which has a 2 port USB hub built in - my KXUSB is plugged in there.? Under this configuration, no joy with the KX3 Utility recognizing the COM port. Configuration 2: My laptop is connected to the KX3 directly via USB port.? Under this configuration, no joy with the KX3 Utility recognizing the COM port. Configuration 3: My laptop is connected to the KX3 directly via USB port.? Under COM port settings for the KX3USB connected port,? I changed the latency timer to 8 ms from 16 ms.? Under this configuration, the KX3 Utility recognizes the COM port every time. Returning to configuration one with the lower latency timer setting does not allow the KX3 utility to see the com port, so no joy there. BUT - it's a weird BUT - If I connect the KXUSB directly to the laptop, open the utility and connect, disconnect the KX3USB from the laptop and connect it to the hub built in to the PK-232sc+, it works as long as I don't exit the KX3 utility software.? I can even close the serial port in the software, BUT as long as I don't exit the software, I can reopen the serial port and it works fine.? I can close the port and use other software that needs the KXUSB as long as I don't exit the KX3 utility program (just leave it minimized) it works when I need it. How crazy is that?? Any gurus figure that one out?? Hank K4HYJ From: Nr4c Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 3:31 PM To: Andy McMullin Cc: Elecraft list Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed On the FTDI site there is a removal tool. Use it to wipe away com port drivers. Then re-install the FTDI drivers for your KUSB or KXUSB cable. Good luck! Sent from my iPhone ...nr4c. bill > On Apr 14, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Andy McMullin via Elecraft wrote: > > Can I just add that at the stage that says reboot, you should really shut down the machine, wait a bit, then > Restart. Sometimes a USB port is not physically but just logically reset by a reboot. > > I hope this helps > > Regards > Andy, G8TQH > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 14 Apr 2019, at 18:17, Tom wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Sometimes driver software can be a pain... >> Try this. >> 1) Open the device manager and select the comport by right clicking on it. >> 2) Check the box to delete the driver software and uninstall. >> 3) Unplug the USB cable. >> 4) Reboot >> 5) Next run the FTDI driver installation.? When prompted or when complete, plug the USB cable back in. >> Sometimes, windows will keep reinstalling the same driver if the files have not been deleted. >> 73 Tom >> va2fsq.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB >> Sent: April 14, 2019 12:47 PM >> To: donwilh at embarqmail.com; 'Dick Dievendorff' >> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >> >> I have done all of those things and no change.? As I said every other piece of software that needs the KXUSB grabs it and uses it fine - just not the utility software. >> >> There is something to the driver installation - it shows as incomplete, but reinstalling the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website still does not fix the problem.? There is still an event message saying that the installation did not complete. >> >> I realizer this is not an Elecraft issue, I'm just looking for help. >> >> Hank >> K4HYJ >> >> From: Don Wilhelm >> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 11:09 AM >> To: hbjr at optilink.us; 'Dick Dievendorff' >> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >> >> Hank, >> >> Installing KX3 Utility will do nothing for changing what your computer does about COM Ports vs USB port assignment.? It is now apparent that your computer is not properly recognizing the FTDI USB to Serial adapter. >> >> Download and install the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website. >> What you are trying to deal with is an FTDI USB to Serial adapter.? Just because the KXUSB cable is sold by Elecraft does not c ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rmcgraw at blomand.net Mon Apr 15 11:47:22 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:47:22 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question In-Reply-To: References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <9702e3ab-30a4-53b8-d84f-1464ea217c94@blomand.net> The? Signalink? provides only the audio path to / from the computer and radio. You will need either the RS232 or USB interface between the radio and computer to handle the frequency control and PTT command. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/15/2019 9:03 AM, Doug Turnbull wrote: > Dear OMs and YLs, > I am going to help a friend get onto FT8. He has a new Tigertronics > SignaLink, with the header for the K3 and appropriate cables for the K3. > This however does not in and of itself provide the ability to shift band or > frequency in the case of Fox Hound mode. > > Is it correct to say that a cable from the K3 RS232 port possibly via > the P3 to the PC is all that is required to gain this frequency shifting > capability. The software being used other than what comes with the > SignaLink is standard WSJTX Version 2.? from K1JT's stable. > > I use FT8 some here but have a MicroKeyer II. This is my first time > using a SignaLink. Your guidance is appreciated. Thank you in > advance. > > 73 Doug EI2CN > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From rick at tavan.com Mon Apr 15 11:53:23 2019 From: rick at tavan.com (Rick Tavan) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 08:53:23 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: As remote Base In-Reply-To: References: <9c056211-edfd-1928-d270-34dc9514e2cd@nk7z.net> Message-ID: Dave, I've been very successful using a RemoteRig configuration similar to that described by Barry. Instead of a K3/0-Mini, I have a full K3 at the control site where I can also operate locally when the suburban QRN subsides. I use an external CW keyer at the control site and inject keying into the RRC through a rear-panel connection, documented but non-obvious. The local monitor in the RRC avoids the confusion caused by latency on the remote K3's own sidetone. I use KPA500 Remote and KAT500 Remote instead of the RC-1216 and I'm very happy with their UIs. They and other utilities I use do require a server computer running at the radio site. I have a remote power strip so I can power down individual devices. A remotely controlled relay board controls various accessories. I use PstRotatorAz to control my rotator and SteppIR beam. The big and new difference between my config and Barry's is remote panadapter. I was dissatisfied with a camera facing the P3 as it provided no access to the P3 controls. But my logging program, N1MM Logger+, now has a Spectrum Display window that I drive with an inexpensive Airspy HF+ SDR at the radio site. It not only provides large-screen display and control of spectrum and waterfall but also integrates with the band map in Logger and the mouse for click-to-QSY functionality. Click on a callsign or signal (with smart zero-beating), or click on a gap between signals, and you're there! I can drive it either from the K3 I.F. Out signal or the K3 RX ANT IN/OUT loop. Both work great and it has introduced a whole new dimension to station control. Internet connection is critical. You don't need high bandwidth but you do need reliable packet delivery. At first, at the rural location of my station, this was a problem - lots of snap, crackle, and pops in received audio. But over time the ISP improved the cable plant and central office equipment and now I can comfortably operate a contest with very little evidence that I'm not actually sitting there. The system integration is a challenging but fun project - don't get discouraged by the many "moving parts." Get it going one piece at a time and you'll be very satisfied with the accomplishment and the eventual result of enjoying a quiet location for the radio while sitting where you need to be sitting! GL & 73, /Rick N6XI -- Rick Tavan Truckee, CA On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 10:01 PM Barry Baines via Elecraft < elecraft at mailman.qth.net> wrote: > Dave: > > > On Apr 11, 2019, at 11:51 PM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I am considering the use of a remote base type of setup to get away from > the RFI in my area. I have finally given up on trying to fight it, and > want to move the rig away from the city, as opposed to hunting down and > correcting every new RFI source endlessly. > > > > My station consists of a KPA500, P3, and K3. I am using a P3 external > keyboard, running an external computer to do FT8, and finally CW via the > radio, not using a computer. > > > > Is there a system which would allow the same functionality I now have, > remotely via the Internet? > > Remote operation is certainly feasible, but it does introduce new > considerations/tradeoffs. I?ve been operating remote since purchasing my > K3 system in 2014 specifically for remote operation. About 80% of my > operating is done remotely. > > 1. I use a K3/IO-mini with the Remote Rig setup to control the K3 because > the K3/IO-Mini front panel is the same as the K3 and I avoid the need to > use a computer to control the K3. > > 2. I control the KPA-500 using the Remote Rig RC-1216H as it provides a > web-based front panel that matches the KPA-500. As it is a web-based > interface, I can use any device (Mac, ioS iPhone or iPAD, Windows PC) to > access the KPA-500 front panel. > > 3. I have the KAT-500 Tuner which I am forced to run the Elecraft Utility > to manage it. I have a serial-to-ethernet converter in the ham shack and > my network at the ham shack location is linked to my location (through > VPN) so that the Windows computer at my location will connect to the > KAT-500 serial interface. > > 4. I do not have access to my P3 operating remotely. Others have > installed video cams aimed at their P3 to forward imagery to their location > to see what the P3 is displaying. Others who do this may have some > thoughts on managing the P3 remotely. > > 5. Antenna selection is done using an Antenna Genius from 4O3A. There are > a total of 8 antenna ports and two radio ports. The K3 system is connected > to Port A and communicates with the Elecraft through BCD to select the > antenna based upon the band that the K3 is set (e.g. 10-15-20 goes to the > tribander, other bands such as 40 and 80 to an EFHW with additional ports > for a dummy load and future 6M antenna). The Elecraft interface to the AG > is based upon Y-boxes developed by Bob Wilson, N6TV. See: > https://www.kkn.net/~n6tv/Y-BOX/ > > Antenna Genius Port B is used by my Flex-6700 Antenna Port ?1? and > associated hardware. The Flex communicates directly with the AG through a > CAT5/Local Area Network connection. > > I also use the AG utility but it can only run in Windows and works with a > remote connection through VPN. > > My primary use for the K3 is voice communications, so I have not delved > into digital modes (yet). My presumption is that operating digital may > require using the PC in the ham shack to do the actual digital operation > while connecting to the shack PC via Team Viewer or other remote access > software to manage the process. Again, others who are actually doing > digital modes while operating remote may have specific suggestions. > > Overall, I?ve been very pleased with the K3 setup operating remotely. The > Codec(s) used by Remote Rig require very low bandwidth while providing > excellent audio. As my station is located in rural SE Georgia where > internet access (at best) is typically 768 Kbps upload/20 Mbps download, I > have no problems running the K3 remotely while using SSB. While I also > enjoy the Flex (particularly since SmartSDR v2 was introduced that allows > remote connection), slow internet is better handled by the K3 system > because of the Remote Rig audio Codecs and the lack of panadapter/waterfall > display that can take up bandwidth. > > FWIW, > > Barry Baines, WD4ASW > > > > > > -- > > 73s and thanks, > > Dave (NK7Z) > > https://www.nk7z.net > > ARRL Technical Specialist > > ARRL Volunteer Examiner > > ARRL OOC for Oregon > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From w6png at yahoo.com Mon Apr 15 11:54:07 2019 From: w6png at yahoo.com (Paul Gacek) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 08:54:07 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question In-Reply-To: <9702e3ab-30a4-53b8-d84f-1464ea217c94@blomand.net> References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <9702e3ab-30a4-53b8-d84f-1464ea217c94@blomand.net> Message-ID: I don?t use a Signalink or any external device beyond the PC to operate FT8 on my K3s. Maybe it's a K3s option (I just can?t remember if it was included or not) but the K3s USB I have enables rig control and also presents the K3s internal sound card to my PC. Just configure WSJT-X to use those two USB devices ?..no SIgnalink needed. Paul W6PNG/M0SNA www.nomadic.com > On Apr 15, 2019, at 8:47 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > > The Signalink provides only the audio path to / from the computer and radio. > > You will need either the RS232 or USB interface between the radio and computer to handle the frequency control and PTT command. > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX > > > On 4/15/2019 9:03 AM, Doug Turnbull wrote: >> Dear OMs and YLs, >> I am going to help a friend get onto FT8. He has a new Tigertronics >> SignaLink, with the header for the K3 and appropriate cables for the K3. >> This however does not in and of itself provide the ability to shift band or >> frequency in the case of Fox Hound mode. >> >> Is it correct to say that a cable from the K3 RS232 port possibly via >> the P3 to the PC is all that is required to gain this frequency shifting >> capability. The software being used other than what comes with the >> SignaLink is standard WSJTX Version 2.? from K1JT's stable. >> >> I use FT8 some here but have a MicroKeyer II. This is my first time >> using a SignaLink. Your guidance is appreciated. Thank you in >> advance. >> >> 73 Doug EI2CN >> >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jnmeade at southslope.net Mon Apr 15 12:12:02 2019 From: jnmeade at southslope.net (James Meade) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 11:12:02 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 For Sale Message-ID: Elecraft K3/100 $2495. S/N 01480. 2008 Kit, 2009 upgrades, 2010 factory inspection and firmware upgrade. K3/100; KAT3 ATU Modulator kit; 2 KFL3A-500 Hz, 5 Pole filters (main/sub); MH2-R Hand Mic; 2 KBPF3A-F General Coverage RX Modules (main/sub); KDVR3 Digital Voice Recorder; KFL3A-6K-IR 6kHz, 8 pole filter (main); 2 KFL3B-FM-IR FM-bandwidth, 8-pole roofing filters (main/sub); KRX3-K 2nd RX Mod kit; KTCX03-1 TXCO 1ppm f/w correction to 0.5ppm; KXV3 Transverter interface. Please contact off list. Good in QRZ. Jim NO0B From barrylazar2 at gmail.com Mon Apr 15 12:27:20 2019 From: barrylazar2 at gmail.com (Barry) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 16:27:20 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question In-Reply-To: References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <9702e3ab-30a4-53b8-d84f-1464ea217c94@blomand.net> Message-ID: Paul, You are correct the K3s does have a built in sound card and it can obviate the need for a SignaLink interface. However, you can just use the radio's VOX vice computer controlled PTT. It works fine this way. This is what I do. 73, Barry K3NDM ------ Original Message ------ From: "Paul Gacek via Elecraft" To: "Bob McGraw K4TAX" Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Sent: 4/15/2019 11:54:07 AM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question >I don?t use a Signalink or any external device beyond the PC to operate FT8 on my K3s. > >Maybe it's a K3s option (I just can?t remember if it was included or not) but the K3s USB I have enables rig control and also presents the K3s internal sound card to my PC. > >Just configure WSJT-X to use those two USB devices ?..no SIgnalink needed. > >Paul >W6PNG/M0SNA >www.nomadic.com > >> On Apr 15, 2019, at 8:47 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: >> >> The Signalink provides only the audio path to / from the computer and radio. >> >> You will need either the RS232 or USB interface between the radio and computer to handle the frequency control and PTT command. >> >> 73 >> >> Bob, K4TAX >> >> >> On 4/15/2019 9:03 AM, Doug Turnbull wrote: >>> Dear OMs and YLs, >>> I am going to help a friend get onto FT8. He has a new Tigertronics >>> SignaLink, with the header for the K3 and appropriate cables for the K3. >>> This however does not in and of itself provide the ability to shift band or >>> frequency in the case of Fox Hound mode. >>> >>> Is it correct to say that a cable from the K3 RS232 port possibly via >>> the P3 to the PC is all that is required to gain this frequency shifting >>> capability. The software being used other than what comes with the >>> SignaLink is standard WSJTX Version 2.? from K1JT's stable. >>> >>> I use FT8 some here but have a MicroKeyer II. This is my first time >>> using a SignaLink. Your guidance is appreciated. Thank you in >>> advance. >>> >>> 73 Doug EI2CN >>> >>> >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From k6dgw at foothill.net Mon Apr 15 13:04:16 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:04:16 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3: As remote Base In-Reply-To: References: <9c056211-edfd-1928-d270-34dc9514e2cd@nk7z.net> Message-ID: <55b4fabb-7bb7-dcb5-2e5c-79a2911016a1@foothill.net> It's the I/O RJ45 connector on the back of the 1258, pin 4, that will key the remote radio, I use it with a Winkey3.? Pin 8 it ground, and while it is documented in a combination of schematic and pin-out diagram, it is, as Rick says, decidedly non-obvious. 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/15/2019 8:53 AM, Rick Tavan wrote: > I use an external CW keyer at the control site and inject keying > into the RRC through a rear-panel connection, documented but non-obvious. > From kl7uw at acsalaska.net Mon Apr 15 13:15:15 2019 From: kl7uw at acsalaska.net (Edward R Cole) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 09:15:15 -0800 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question Message-ID: <201904151715.x3FHFJ84024973@mail40c28.carrierzone.com> Paul (and Bob, etal): I quite agree. No signal link device is needed to do digital modes with either K3 or K3s. I have a K3 (SN 4340) which has the RS232 control port. I bought the USB/RS232 conversion cable from Elecraft. I run JT65 just fine with two RS audio cables to my computer. In later eme modifications to use MAP65 in dual-polarity diversity RX, I've added two LP-Pan which provide Rx audio and run both MAP65 and another program that controls K3 frequency. That mod required controlling the K3 from two comports so I made a RS232 splitter to separate RTS/DTV lines and RXD/TXD lines to separate 9-pin connectors (RS232). http://www.kl7uw.com/station%20layout.htm But simple JT65 and FT8 don't need that complication. Just run audio cables from the K3 transverter I/F to your computer and run the RS232/USB cable. I do not have a K3s so may even be simpler with straight USB to USB connection. I simply wonder why folks with the K3/K3s buy a signal link? Not needed and merely adds confusion (unneeded expense). I'm also told the signal link soundcard is inferior. I don't run all the fancy HF logging/control sw which I think is also providing control issues for a lot of you wanting to do FT8 (with WSJT-X). I can offer you no help with them (obvious there are experts on this list for that advice). GL, 73, Ed - KL7UW Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 08:54:07 -0700 From: Paul Gacek To: Bob McGraw K4TAX Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 I don?t use a Signalink or any external device beyond the PC to operate FT8 on my K3s. Maybe it's a K3s option (I just can?t remember if it was included or not) but the K3s USB I have enables rig control and also presents the K3s internal sound card to my PC. Just configure WSJT-X to use those two USB devices ?..no SIgnalink needed. Paul W6PNG/M0SNA www.nomadic.com 73, Ed - KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com Dubus-NA Business mail: dubususa at gmail.com From OH2CG at kolumbus.fi Mon Apr 15 13:16:30 2019 From: OH2CG at kolumbus.fi (Pentti A J Pajunen) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:16:30 +0300 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft Digest, Vol 180, Issue 16 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <520ce384-55fe-b66e-a847-f8dcf6931045@kolumbus.fi> Hello Doug et all The CE -marking is not "A REAL" approval, it's just A manufacturers claim of the product fullfilling the reqired standards. UL listing on it's behalf is an approval that's granted for the manufacturer after testing and inspection. The applicant must send all of the drawings, BOM, some required samples &c to UL. The UL inspector then regulary visits the manufacturer (an audit) to make sure that the approved product is as figured in the application of the approval... I worked as an UL representative years ago in FIMKO (Elecrical inspectorate of Finland) . So, don't worry about missing CE on the labels. In Finland some humorists call CE -marking as an abbreviation for "China Export" :-D. 73 & CU Penna OH2G, OH2CG elecraft-request at mailman.qth.net kirjoitti 15.4.2019 klo 18.54: > Send Elecraft mailing list submissions to > elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > elecraft-request at mailman.qth.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > elecraft-owner at mailman.qth.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Elecraft digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Just wondering (hawley, charles j jr) > 2. Re: [QRP-L] AlexLoop FS (Niel Skousen) > 3. Re: Just wondering (Ken K3IU) > 4. X3 Utility problem: serial port is closed (Dauer, Edward) > 5. Re: KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed (Andy McMullin) > 6. Re: KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed (Nr4c) > 7. Re: KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed (HB) > 8. Re: WTB: KAT3A tuner Module (Gary Smith) > 9. Re: KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed (Bill Johnson) > 10. Elecraft CW Net Report (kevinr) > 11. Visalia? (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP) > 12. Re: Visalia? (Bill Frantz) > 13. [K1] TX part sick (Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS) > 14. Re: [K1] TX part sick (Don Wilhelm) > 15. K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question (Doug Turnbull) > 16. KPA 1500 CE Approval (Doug Turnbull) > 17. Re: [K1] TX part sick (Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS) > 18. Re: K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question (Don Wilhelm) > 19. K3S for Sale (Gene) > 20. Re: KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed (Hank) > 21. Re: K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question (Bob McGraw K4TAX) > 22. Re: K3: As remote Base (Rick Tavan) > 23. Re: K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question (Paul Gacek) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 17:20:18 +0000 > From: "hawley, charles j jr" > To: Bud > Cc: "elecraft at mailman.qth.net" > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just wondering > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > I bought #1089 in March2000. > > Chuck KE9UW > c-hawley at illinois.edu > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Apr 14, 2019, at 10:49 AM, Bud wrote: >> >> I am interested in learning the year that the K2 was introduced into the Amateur Radio market. >> And, what is the approximate year K2 s/n 2514 was shipped? >> Thanks to the Elecraft historian(s) that can answer my questions. >> >> Bud ? >> NY1Z >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 11:20:14 -0600 > From: Niel Skousen > To: QRP-L Mailing List , Elecraft Reflector > > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [QRP-L] AlexLoop FS > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Sorry for bad grammar Gang; > > I will send via USPS Flat Rate, the day after payment. Some one thought I was saying I?d use Next Day shipping - not so ... > > Niel > WA7SSA > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 14, 2019, at 07:40, Niel Skousen wrote: >> >> Good Afternoon Gang, >> >> I am selling my AlexLoop with a small camera tripod. >> PayPal ok ( niel(dot)skousen(at)gmail.com ) will USPS next day >> >> Asking $325 conus, + actual freight for other shipping requests. >> >> Niel >> WA7SSA >> ______________________________________________________________ >> QRP-L mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/qrp-l >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:QRP-L at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> Message delivered to nskousen at talisman-intl.com > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 13:48:04 -0400 > From: Ken K3IU > To: Bud , "elecraft at mailman.qth.net" > > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Just wondering > Message-ID: <77b2b0fb-7869-20ee-2c6d-df3869a6ed9c at cox.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > I built #2888 in Oct 2002. > Ken K3IU > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > On 4/14/2019 11:48 AM, Bud wrote: >> I am interested in learning the year that the K2 was introduced into the Amateur Radio market. >> And, what is the approximate year K2 s/n 2514 was shipped? >> Thanks to the Elecraft historian(s) that can answer my questions. >> >> Bud ? >> NY1Z >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 18:08:54 +0000 > From: "Dauer, Edward" > To: "elecraft at mailman.qth.net" , > "hbjr at optilink.us" > Subject: [Elecraft] X3 Utility problem: serial port is closed > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hank, I cannot offer any technical help but I can offer empathy, be it ever so OT. > > I often have the same problem with N1MM. Some days it finds a port; some days it doesn't. There is no correlation that I can discern with anything I do -- including cussing, fiddling, supplication, offering to negotiate, lunar phases, making contributions to charitable causes, turning devices on and off . . . > > I am convinced the digital world has escaped its creators and created an unruly universe of its own. Hamlet was prescient: "There are more things in Heaven and Earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy." > > In bocca al lupo, > > Ted, KN1CBR > > > -----Original Message----- > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB > Sent: April 14, 2019 12:47 PM > To: donwilh at embarqmail.com; 'Dick Dievendorff' > Cc: 'Elecraft list' > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed > > I have done all of those things and no change. As I said every other piece of software that needs the KXUSB grabs it and uses it fine ? just not the utility software. > > There is something to the driver installation ? it shows as incomplete, but reinstalling the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website still does not fix the problem. There is still an event message saying that the installation did not complete. > > I realizer this is not an Elecraft issue, I?m just looking for help. > > Hank > K4HYJ > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 19:38:41 +0100 > From: Andy McMullin > To: Tom > Cc: Elecraft list > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed > Message-ID: <97FB1566-4F16-41CF-9EAD-799A9DB13467 at rickham.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Can I just add that at the stage that says reboot, you should really shut down the machine, wait a bit, then > Restart. Sometimes a USB port is not physically but just logically reset by a reboot. > > I hope this helps > > Regards > Andy, G8TQH > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 14 Apr 2019, at 18:17, Tom wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Sometimes driver software can be a pain... >> Try this. >> 1) Open the device manager and select the comport by right clicking on it. >> 2) Check the box to delete the driver software and uninstall. >> 3) Unplug the USB cable. >> 4) Reboot >> 5) Next run the FTDI driver installation. When prompted or when complete, plug the USB cable back in. >> Sometimes, windows will keep reinstalling the same driver if the files have not been deleted. >> 73 Tom >> va2fsq.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB >> Sent: April 14, 2019 12:47 PM >> To: donwilh at embarqmail.com; 'Dick Dievendorff' >> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >> >> I have done all of those things and no change. As I said every other piece of software that needs the KXUSB grabs it and uses it fine ? just not the utility software. >> >> There is something to the driver installation ? it shows as incomplete, but reinstalling the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website still does not fix the problem. There is still an event message saying that the installation did not complete. >> >> I realizer this is not an Elecraft issue, I?m just looking for help. >> >> Hank >> K4HYJ >> >> From: Don Wilhelm >> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 11:09 AM >> To: hbjr at optilink.us; 'Dick Dievendorff' >> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >> >> Hank, >> >> Installing KX3 Utility will do nothing for changing what your computer does about COM Ports vs USB port assignment. It is now apparent that your computer is not properly recognizing the FTDI USB to Serial adapter. >> >> Download and install the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website. >> What you are trying to deal with is an FTDI USB to Serial adapter. Just because the KXUSB cable is sold by Elecraft does not change that fact - the FTDI chipset is not an Elecraft device, but an FTDI device even though it is included in the KXUSB. >> >> 73, >> Don W3FPR >> >>> On 4/14/2019 10:06 AM, hbjr at optilink.us wrote: >>> Reinstalling the KX3 utility software from the Elecraft site did nothing. >>> >>> How can I check the registry values on the PC to know if that is the cause? >>> >>> Hank >>> K4HYJ >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Dick Dievendorff >>> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 12:47 AM >>> To: donwilh at embarqmail.com >>> Cc: HB ; Elecraft list >>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >>> >>> The kx3 gets its inventory of com ports from registry values populated by complete device driver installation. >>> >>> Dick, K6KR >>> >>> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 15:29:58 -0400 > From: Nr4c > To: Andy McMullin > Cc: Elecraft list > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed > Message-ID: <7BC25936-DC90-40BC-98A4-88FEE973FD4C at widomaker.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > On the FTDI site there is a removal tool. Use it to wipe away com port drivers. Then re-install the FTDI drivers for your KUSB or KXUSB cable. > > Good luck! > > Sent from my iPhone > ...nr4c. bill > > >> On Apr 14, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Andy McMullin via Elecraft wrote: >> >> Can I just add that at the stage that says reboot, you should really shut down the machine, wait a bit, then >> Restart. Sometimes a USB port is not physically but just logically reset by a reboot. >> >> I hope this helps >> >> Regards >> Andy, G8TQH >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On 14 Apr 2019, at 18:17, Tom wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> Sometimes driver software can be a pain... >>> Try this. >>> 1) Open the device manager and select the comport by right clicking on it. >>> 2) Check the box to delete the driver software and uninstall. >>> 3) Unplug the USB cable. >>> 4) Reboot >>> 5) Next run the FTDI driver installation. When prompted or when complete, plug the USB cable back in. >>> Sometimes, windows will keep reinstalling the same driver if the files have not been deleted. >>> 73 Tom >>> va2fsq.com >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB >>> Sent: April 14, 2019 12:47 PM >>> To: donwilh at embarqmail.com; 'Dick Dievendorff' >>> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >>> >>> I have done all of those things and no change. As I said every other piece of software that needs the KXUSB grabs it and uses it fine ? just not the utility software. >>> >>> There is something to the driver installation ? it shows as incomplete, but reinstalling the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website still does not fix the problem. There is still an event message saying that the installation did not complete. >>> >>> I realizer this is not an Elecraft issue, I?m just looking for help. >>> >>> Hank >>> K4HYJ >>> >>> From: Don Wilhelm >>> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 11:09 AM >>> To: hbjr at optilink.us; 'Dick Dievendorff' >>> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >>> >>> Hank, >>> >>> Installing KX3 Utility will do nothing for changing what your computer does about COM Ports vs USB port assignment. It is now apparent that your computer is not properly recognizing the FTDI USB to Serial adapter. >>> >>> Download and install the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website. >>> What you are trying to deal with is an FTDI USB to Serial adapter. Just because the KXUSB cable is sold by Elecraft does not c > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 22:17:13 -0400 > From: HB > To: Nr4c , Andy McMullin > Cc: Elecraft list > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Okay?some weirdness, but I can get the software to work. Here is what I have done (some help from you guys, some help from the IT guys where I work, and the internet). It?s a little complex? > > Configuration 1: My laptop is connected via USB to a PK-232SC+ which has a 2 port USB hub built in ? my KXUSB is plugged in there. Under this configuration, no joy with the KX3 Utility recognizing the COM port. > > Configuration 2: My laptop is connected to the KX3 directly via USB port. Under this configuration, no joy with the KX3 Utility recognizing the COM port. > > Configuration 3: My laptop is connected to the KX3 directly via USB port. Under COM port settings for the KX3USB connected port, I changed the latency timer to 8 ms from 16 ms. Under this configuration, the KX3 Utility recognizes the COM port every time. > > Returning to configuration one with the lower latency timer setting does not allow the KX3 utility to see the com port, so no joy there. > > BUT ? it?s a weird BUT ? If I connect the KXUSB directly to the laptop, open the utility and connect, disconnect the KX3USB from the laptop and connect it to the hub built in to the PK-232sc+, it works as long as I don?t exit the KX3 utility software. I can even close the serial port in the software, BUT as long as I don?t exit the software, I can reopen the serial port and it works fine. I can close the port and use other software that needs the KXUSB as long as I don?t exit the KX3 utility program (just leave it minimized) it works when I need it. > > How crazy is that? Any gurus figure that one out?? > > Hank > K4HYJ > > > From: Nr4c > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 3:31 PM > To: Andy McMullin > Cc: Elecraft list > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed > > On the FTDI site there is a removal tool. Use it to wipe away com port drivers. Then re-install the FTDI drivers for your KUSB or KXUSB cable. > > Good luck! > > Sent from my iPhone > ...nr4c. bill > > >> On Apr 14, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Andy McMullin via Elecraft wrote: >> >> Can I just add that at the stage that says reboot, you should really shut down the machine, wait a bit, then >> Restart. Sometimes a USB port is not physically but just logically reset by a reboot. >> >> I hope this helps >> >> Regards >> Andy, G8TQH >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On 14 Apr 2019, at 18:17, Tom wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> Sometimes driver software can be a pain... >>> Try this. >>> 1) Open the device manager and select the comport by right clicking on it. >>> 2) Check the box to delete the driver software and uninstall. >>> 3) Unplug the USB cable. >>> 4) Reboot >>> 5) Next run the FTDI driver installation. When prompted or when complete, plug the USB cable back in. >>> Sometimes, windows will keep reinstalling the same driver if the files have not been deleted. >>> 73 Tom >>> va2fsq.com >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB >>> Sent: April 14, 2019 12:47 PM >>> To: donwilh at embarqmail.com; 'Dick Dievendorff' >>> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >>> >>> I have done all of those things and no change. As I said every other piece of software that needs the KXUSB grabs it and uses it fine ? just not the utility software. >>> >>> There is something to the driver installation ? it shows as incomplete, but reinstalling the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website still does not fix the problem. There is still an event message saying that the installation did not complete. >>> >>> I realizer this is not an Elecraft issue, I?m just looking for help. >>> >>> Hank >>> K4HYJ >>> >>> From: Don Wilhelm >>> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 11:09 AM >>> To: hbjr at optilink.us; 'Dick Dievendorff' >>> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >>> >>> Hank, >>> >>> Installing KX3 Utility will do nothing for changing what your computer does about COM Ports vs USB port assignment. It is now apparent that your computer is not properly recognizing the FTDI USB to Serial adapter. >>> >>> Download and install the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website. >>> What you are trying to deal with is an FTDI USB to Serial adapter. Just because the KXUSB cable is sold by Elecraft does not c > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 22:45:17 -0400 > From: "Gary Smith" > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] WTB: KAT3A tuner Module > Message-ID: <5CB3F03D.6451.13E3EB30 at Gary.ka1j.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > > A follow-up; > > While I still would like to buy an excess > KAT3A for my K3 & if you have one, please > contact me off-list. It turns out my KAT3A > is now working perfectly at this time > > Before I packed it up to send back for > repair I looked at the socket and noticed > they were not gold pins, only the male > pins on the main board are gold. I doubt > there would be corrosion so soon but > what's to lose? > > I dripped some Deoxit 100 in and let it > set a few minutes, then squirted regular > 15% deoxit with its 85% lube, cleaned and > reinstalled it. The KAT3A is now working > perfectly on 160 again and as before, all > the other bands are also working. > > I emailed Elecraft to let them know I > don't need the RMA and won't be sending it > in. Glad they were there and willing had I > needed to get it repaired. > > 73 all, > > Gary > KA1J > >> Looks like I need a replacement KAT3A >> tuner. Weighing the cost of >> repair/replacement, I wonder if anyone has >> one that they did not use, are not >> needing? >> >> If so, please contact me off list with the >> details. >> >> 73, >> >> Gary >> KA1J >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 02:46:49 +0000 > From: Bill Johnson > To: HB , Nr4c , Andy McMullin > > Cc: Elecraft list > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed > Message-ID: > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" > > Do you have a desktop virus? A major cause of what you are experiencing.? > > Bill > 920-421-1172 > > ________________________________ > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of HB > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 9:17:13 PM > To: Nr4c; Andy McMullin > Cc: Elecraft list > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed > > Okay?some weirdness, but I can get the software to work. Here is what I have done (some help from you guys, some help from the IT guys where I work, and the internet). It?s a little complex? > > Configuration 1: My laptop is connected via USB to a PK-232SC+ which has a 2 port USB hub built in ? my KXUSB is plugged in there. Under this configuration, no joy with the KX3 Utility recognizing the COM port. > > Configuration 2: My laptop is connected to the KX3 directly via USB port. Under this configuration, no joy with the KX3 Utility recognizing the COM port. > > Configuration 3: My laptop is connected to the KX3 directly via USB port. Under COM port settings for the KX3USB connected port, I changed the latency timer to 8 ms from 16 ms. Under this configuration, the KX3 Utility recognizes the COM port every time. > > Returning to configuration one with the lower latency timer setting does not allow the KX3 utility to see the com port, so no joy there. > > BUT ? it?s a weird BUT ? If I connect the KXUSB directly to the laptop, open the utility and connect, disconnect the KX3USB from the laptop and connect it to the hub built in to the PK-232sc+, it works as long as I don?t exit the KX3 utility software. I can even close the serial port in the software, BUT as long as I don?t exit the software, I can reopen the serial port and it works fine. I can close the port and use other software that needs the KXUSB as long as I don?t exit the KX3 utility program (just leave it minimized) it works when I need it. > > How crazy is that? Any gurus figure that one out?? > > Hank > K4HYJ > > > From: Nr4c > Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 3:31 PM > To: Andy McMullin > Cc: Elecraft list > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed > > On the FTDI site there is a removal tool. Use it to wipe away com port drivers. Then re-install the FTDI drivers for your KUSB or KXUSB cable. > > Good luck! > > Sent from my iPhone > ...nr4c. bill > > >> On Apr 14, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Andy McMullin via Elecraft wrote: >> >> Can I just add that at the stage that says reboot, you should really shut down the machine, wait a bit, then >> Restart. Sometimes a USB port is not physically but just logically reset by a reboot. >> >> I hope this helps >> >> Regards >> Andy, G8TQH >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On 14 Apr 2019, at 18:17, Tom wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> Sometimes driver software can be a pain... >>> Try this. >>> 1) Open the device manager and select the comport by right clicking on it. >>> 2) Check the box to delete the driver software and uninstall. >>> 3) Unplug the USB cable. >>> 4) Reboot >>> 5) Next run the FTDI driver installation. When prompted or when complete, plug the USB cable back in. >>> Sometimes, windows will keep reinstalling the same driver if the files have not been deleted. >>> 73 Tom >>> va2fsq.com >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB >>> Sent: April 14, 2019 12:47 PM >>> To: donwilh at embarqmail.com; 'Dick Dievendorff' >>> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >>> >>> I have done all of those things and no change. As I said every other piece of software that needs the KXUSB grabs it and uses it fine ? just not the utility software. >>> >>> There is something to the driver installation ? it shows as incomplete, but reinstalling the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website still does not fix the problem. There is still an event message saying that the installation did not complete. >>> >>> I realizer this is not an Elecraft issue, I?m just looking for help. >>> >>> Hank >>> K4HYJ >>> >>> From: Don Wilhelm >>> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 11:09 AM >>> To: hbjr at optilink.us; 'Dick Dievendorff' >>> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >>> >>> Hank, >>> >>> Installing KX3 Utility will do nothing for changing what your computer does about COM Ports vs USB port assignment. It is now apparent that your computer is not properly recognizing the FTDI USB to Serial adapter. >>> >>> Download and install the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website. >>> What you are trying to deal with is an FTDI USB to Serial adapter. Just because the KXUSB cable is sold by Elecraft does not c > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 20:17:57 -0700 > From: kevinr > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report > Message-ID: <2914c997-5abd-e2d2-6bdb-fb8de640221c at coho.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > Good Evening, > > ?? Propagation was better this week.? Plenty of noise and QSB but at > least signals were present.? S0 to S5 with decent copy.? I did not hear > any thunderstorms.? Cool weather reports for the most part.? Lots of > yard work and clean up.? Antenna projects will get pushed off for a > little while.? I wonder if raising one while there are thousands of > biting flies improves propagation as much as inclement weather does.? > May have to experiment and take notes. > > > ? On 14049.5 ? kHz at 2200z: > > W0CZ - Ken - ND > > K4TO - Dave - KY > > K4JPN - Steve - GA > > K0DTJ - Brian - CA > > > ? On 7048 kHz at 0000z: > > WM5F - Dwight - ID > > K0DTJ - Brian - CA > > K6PJV - Dale - CA > > AE6JV - Bill - CA > > K4TO - Dave - KY > > > Until next week 73, > > ?? Kevin.? KD5ONS > > > > RIP Harlan Ellison? 1934 - 2019 > > _ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 07:05:16 +0300 > From: Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP > To: Elecraft Reflector > Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia? > Message-ID: <5739a8f2-4bbb-05cf-ed15-f8b41a36a82f at gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > Did Elecraft show or hint at anything interesting at the Visalia DX > Convention? -- 73 & CU Pena, OH2G, OH2CG From a.durbin at msn.com Mon Apr 15 13:17:01 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:17:01 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Prototype KPA500 monitor In-Reply-To: References: , Message-ID: No interest shown here but I have been asked for more information off list. Since the work is done I'll share it here. The attached will give you some idea of how PA dissipation and PA efficiency change with output power and loading. These plots are from a test I ran last year, long before the KPA500 Monitor page was added to my Arduino interface. The introductory para of the incomplete report is quoted below: "Summary A semi-automated test was run for various frequencies and PA load conditions. Spectrum lab was used to generate a 1,000 Hz tone with a sawtooth amplitude profile. This tone was used to modulate the TS-590S exciter. An Arduino based data logger recorded serial data from the KPA500 and an LP-100A. These data were processed in Excel by using a pre-defined template. The LP-100A provides SWR, Z, and phase angle. X and R were computed from Z and phase angle." 73, Andy k3wyc https://www.dropbox.com/s/r0jq4vdgdndgj53/KPA500%20PA%20diss%20and%20effic%20k3wyc.pdf?dl=0 From eric.csuf at gmail.com Mon Apr 15 13:26:49 2019 From: eric.csuf at gmail.com (EricJ) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:26:49 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] FREE: Rework Eliminators Message-ID: Rework Eliminators K2 Un-Module Header PCB Kit Unused. Original Documentation Here's a review by VE3WDM explaining what they are: http://elecraftk2.blogspot.com/p/blog-page_27.html Free, including free shipping, to first one to claim it. A way of paying back the list for recently my recently posted (and quickly sold) items. Eric KE6US From a.durbin at msn.com Mon Apr 15 13:39:58 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:39:58 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Prototype KPA500 monitor In-Reply-To: References: , , Message-ID: Rev A corrects 2 typos in the load descriptions. https://www.dropbox.com/s/koh1oio8jywwqx9/KPA500%20PA%20diss%20and%20effic%20k3wyc%20rev%20A.pdf?dl=0 Previous file deleted. 73, Andy k3wyc From eric.csuf at gmail.com Mon Apr 15 13:41:27 2019 From: eric.csuf at gmail.com (EricJ) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:41:27 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Rework Eliminator Gone in 5 minutes Message-ID: Free Rework Eliminator "sold" in 5 minutes. Free really works! Eric KE6US From w4sc at windstream.net Mon Apr 15 15:54:24 2019 From: w4sc at windstream.net (w4sc) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 15:54:24 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Utility and Win 10 Message-ID: <8D.21.08923.F61E4BC5@smtp01.aqua.bos.sync.lan> Having trouble with Win10 and K3 Utility communicating with K3. Latest K3 utility, and have tried 2 different Win10 machines, all latest updates. Tried lower/higher speeds, no joy. Works FB win7. (tnx again Microsoft!!) Ideas anyone?? Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From donwilh at embarqmail.com Mon Apr 15 16:15:54 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 16:15:54 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Utility and Win 10 In-Reply-To: <8D.21.08923.F61E4BC5@smtp01.aqua.bos.sync.lan> References: <8D.21.08923.F61E4BC5@smtp01.aqua.bos.sync.lan> Message-ID: <13dd3050-990e-dd0e-555b-631d9da25bb0@embarqmail.com> Are you using a USB to serial adapter? If so, have you downloaded and installed the latest drivers for that adapter (if the Elecraft KUSB the drivers are from FTDI). Reboot the computer after installation. Use a USB port on the computer, not on a hub. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/15/2019 3:54 PM, w4sc wrote: > Having trouble with Win10 and K3 Utility communicating with K3. Latest K3 utility, and have tried 2 different Win10 machines, all latest updates. Tried lower/higher speeds, no joy. Works FB win7. (tnx again Microsoft!!) Ideas anyone?? From w4sc at windstream.net Mon Apr 15 17:47:03 2019 From: w4sc at windstream.net (w4sc) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:47:03 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Utility and Win 10 In-Reply-To: <13dd3050-990e-dd0e-555b-631d9da25bb0@embarqmail.com> References: <8D.21.08923.F61E4BC5@smtp01.aqua.bos.sync.lan> <13dd3050-990e-dd0e-555b-631d9da25bb0@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <17.43.10887.6DBF4BC5@smtp03.aqua.bos.sync.lan> Using FTDI USB from Elecraft, FTDI latest drivers, No HUB, Works with win7, does not work with Win10. Going back to Win 7. Ben Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Don Wilhelm Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 4:16 PM To: w4sc; Elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Utility and Win 10 Are you using a USB to serial adapter? If so, have you downloaded and installed the latest drivers for that adapter (if the Elecraft KUSB the drivers are from FTDI). Reboot the computer after installation. Use a USB port on the computer, not on a hub. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/15/2019 3:54 PM, w4sc wrote: > Having trouble with Win10 and K3 Utility communicating with K3. Latest K3 utility, and have tried 2 different Win10 machines, all latest updates. Tried lower/higher speeds, no joy. Works FB win7. (tnx again Microsoft!!) Ideas anyone?? From bbaines at mac.com Mon Apr 15 18:01:41 2019 From: bbaines at mac.com (Barry Baines) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:01:41 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1D75D7CA-26F7-4AF0-B165-87E813E9835E@mac.com> Bill: > On Apr 15, 2019, at 12:18 AM, Bill Frantz wrote: > > No. There were the usual show special deals and the KPA1500 was emphasized. The whole conference, including the vendor area, was fairly low key, with nothing new and earth shattering. Out of curiosity. did Flex Radio Systems tout their new SmartSDR v3,0.19 featuring ?multiFlex? that allows two operators to share one Flex-6xxx series transceiver (or one operator use two devices such as a laptop with SmartSDR and a Maestro connected to the same transceiver at the same time)? Given the focus on DX and contesting at Visalia, I?m wondering what the crowd reaction might have been to this newly released capability? I suspect that while this is a technical achievement, non-contest users are being challenged to determine how exactly multiFLEX works and what advantages it brings to their operating experience. However, there appears to be significant benefits to multi operator contest stations as well as single operator two radio (SO2R) setups, reducing the number of transceivers and associated control boxes/cabling while allowing both two operations using the same transceiver to share the same antenna. I also suspect that what is driving Flex?s focus on the needs of contest operations is that contest stations spend ?real money? on equipment and software to enhance their competitive advantage. It?ll be interesting to see whether the evolution of technology by Flex using SDR will translate to tangible benefits for the "rest of us? as well as whether other equipment manufacturers respond to these technical enhancements. 73, Barry, WD4ASW > > 73 Bill AE6JV > > On 4/15/19 at 9:05 PM, k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP) wrote: > >> Did Elecraft show or hint at anything interesting at the Visalia DX Convention? > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Bill Frantz | I don't have high-speed | Periwinkle > (408)356-8506 | internet. I have DSL. | 16345 Englewood Ave > www.pwpconsult.com | | Los Gatos, CA 95032 > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From ns9i at bayland.net Mon Apr 15 18:04:41 2019 From: ns9i at bayland.net (dgb) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:04:41 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Utility and Win 10 In-Reply-To: <17.43.10887.6DBF4BC5@smtp03.aqua.bos.sync.lan> References: <8D.21.08923.F61E4BC5@smtp01.aqua.bos.sync.lan> <13dd3050-990e-dd0e-555b-631d9da25bb0@embarqmail.com> <17.43.10887.6DBF4BC5@smtp03.aqua.bos.sync.lan> Message-ID: <17caf3f8-1454-f2e2-4a19-dbb895853b53@bayland.net> Using the correct port? On 4/15/2019 5:47 PM, w4sc wrote: > Using FTDI USB from Elecraft, FTDI latest drivers, No HUB, Works with win7, does not work with Win10. > > Going back to Win 7. > > Ben > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > From: Don Wilhelm > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 4:16 PM > To: w4sc; Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Utility and Win 10 > > Are you using a USB to serial adapter? If so, have you downloaded and > installed the latest drivers for that adapter (if the Elecraft KUSB the > drivers are from FTDI). Reboot the computer after installation. > > Use a USB port on the computer, not on a hub. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/15/2019 3:54 PM, w4sc wrote: >> Having trouble with Win10 and K3 Utility communicating with K3. Latest K3 utility, and have tried 2 different Win10 machines, all latest updates. Tried lower/higher speeds, no joy. Works FB win7. (tnx again Microsoft!!) Ideas anyone?? > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > From a.durbin at msn.com Mon Apr 15 19:49:42 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 23:49:42 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Utility and Win 10 Message-ID: "Use a USB port on the computer, not on a hub." Why is this restriction imposed on the K3 utility? The KAT500 and KPA500 utilities work fine through my 10 port hub. Andy, k3wyc From frantz at pwpconsult.com Mon Apr 15 20:03:14 2019 From: frantz at pwpconsult.com (Bill Frantz) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:03:14 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I can, and almost always do, use the K3/P3/KX3 utilities through a hub to my Elecraft USB <--> RS232 cable or K3 upgraded internal equivalent from my Mac. The connection between the two USB <--> RS232 connections persist over shutting down and moving the computer. What is going on with Windows USB support? 73 Bill AE6JV On 4/15/19 at 8:10 AM, hbjr at optilink.us (Hank) wrote: >It's always been the case when using the Elecraft Utility, that >you need to connect the rig directly to your computer, using >the Elecraft cable.... with no other devices in line. ?That's >why you succeeded with case 3. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | The first thing you need when | Periwinkle (408)356-8506 | using a perimeter defense is a | 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com | perimeter. | Los Gatos, CA 95032 From red99cam at sbcglobal.net Mon Apr 15 20:08:19 2019 From: red99cam at sbcglobal.net (Albert Little) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 00:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] Wanted K2 References: <414758418.1165828.1555373299740.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <414758418.1165828.1555373299740@mail.yahoo.com> Hi Does anyone have a K2/10 for sale with antenna tuner and ssb ? Thanks, AlbertW5APL From w2blc at nycap.rr.com Mon Apr 15 20:09:27 2019 From: w2blc at nycap.rr.com (Bill) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:09:27 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Utility and Win 10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <708c3b1e-7008-73e9-e36d-434d3414684c@nycap.rr.com> I run everything on hubs - except for the K3.? And, to make matters worse, updates often upset the computer and a complete reinstall is needed.? Back up, back up, and back more.? Gotta luv Windows 10!!! From frantz at pwpconsult.com Mon Apr 15 20:10:39 2019 From: frantz at pwpconsult.com (Bill Frantz) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:10:39 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question In-Reply-To: <201904151715.x3FHFJ84024973@mail40c28.carrierzone.com> Message-ID: You certainly don't need a SignaLink or any computer sound card with an upgraded K3 or a K3S. The early SignaLinks has a number of problems. I saw a web site that gave directions for fixing them, opened up my, by now quite old, SignaLink and found that every one of the modifications was included in my version of the SignaLink. BTW, I am using a $5 from Amazon sound dongle with a homebrew audio cable (with a pad to reduce the Mic input to the dongle) with my KX3. It is much smaller and therefore easier to transport, but works well. 73 Bill AE6JV On 4/15/19 at 10:15 AM, kl7uw at acsalaska.net (Edward R Cole) wrote: >I simply wonder why folks with the K3/K3s buy a signal link? >Not needed and merely adds confusion (unneeded expense). I'm >also told the signal link soundcard is inferior. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | Truth and love must prevail | Periwinkle (408)356-8506 | over lies and hate. | 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com | - Vaclav Havel | Los Gatos, CA 95032 From d.cutter at ntlworld.com Mon Apr 15 20:22:28 2019 From: d.cutter at ntlworld.com (CUTTER DAVID) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:22:28 +0100 (BST) Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia? In-Reply-To: <1D75D7CA-26F7-4AF0-B165-87E813E9835E@mac.com> References: <1D75D7CA-26F7-4AF0-B165-87E813E9835E@mac.com> Message-ID: <1090423612.1440617.1555374148138@mail2.virginmedia.com> I had a nice chat with Eric talking about remoting the P3 David G3UNA > On 15 April 2019 at 23:01 Barry Baines via Elecraft wrote: > > > Bill: > > > On Apr 15, 2019, at 12:18 AM, Bill Frantz wrote: > > > > No. There were the usual show special deals and the KPA1500 was emphasized. The whole conference, including the vendor area, was fairly low key, with nothing new and earth shattering. > > Out of curiosity. did Flex Radio Systems tout their new SmartSDR v3,0.19 featuring ?multiFlex? that allows two operators to share one Flex-6xxx series transceiver (or one operator use two devices such as a laptop with SmartSDR and a Maestro connected to the same transceiver at the same time)? Given the focus on DX and contesting at Visalia, I?m wondering what the crowd reaction might have been to this newly released capability? > > I suspect that while this is a technical achievement, non-contest users are being challenged to determine how exactly multiFLEX works and what advantages it brings to their operating experience. However, there appears to be significant benefits to multi operator contest stations as well as single operator two radio (SO2R) setups, reducing the number of transceivers and associated control boxes/cabling while allowing both two operations using the same transceiver to share the same antenna. > > I also suspect that what is driving Flex?s focus on the needs of contest operations is that contest stations spend ?real money? on equipment and software to enhance their competitive advantage. It?ll be interesting to see whether the evolution of technology by Flex using SDR will translate to tangible benefits for the "rest of us? as well as whether other equipment manufacturers respond to these technical enhancements. > > 73, > Barry, WD4ASW > > > > > 73 Bill AE6JV > > > > On 4/15/19 at 9:05 PM, k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP) wrote: > > > >> Did Elecraft show or hint at anything interesting at the Visalia DX Convention? > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Bill Frantz | I don't have high-speed | Periwinkle > > (408)356-8506 | internet. I have DSL. | 16345 Englewood Ave > > www.pwpconsult.com | | Los Gatos, CA 95032 > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From dave at nk7z.net Mon Apr 15 20:25:45 2019 From: dave at nk7z.net (Dave Cole (NK7Z)) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:25:45 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia? In-Reply-To: <1090423612.1440617.1555374148138@mail2.virginmedia.com> References: <1D75D7CA-26F7-4AF0-B165-87E813E9835E@mac.com> <1090423612.1440617.1555374148138@mail2.virginmedia.com> Message-ID: <4be59af2-8edb-54dc-769c-fc2e78074dc8@nk7z.net> And? 73s and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Technical Specialist ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL OOC for Oregon On 4/15/19 5:22 PM, CUTTER DAVID via Elecraft wrote: > I had a nice chat with Eric talking about remoting the P3 > David G3UNA >> On 15 April 2019 at 23:01 Barry Baines via Elecraft wrote: >> >> >> Bill: >> >>> On Apr 15, 2019, at 12:18 AM, Bill Frantz wrote: >>> >>> No. There were the usual show special deals and the KPA1500 was emphasized. The whole conference, including the vendor area, was fairly low key, with nothing new and earth shattering. >> >> Out of curiosity. did Flex Radio Systems tout their new SmartSDR v3,0.19 featuring ?multiFlex? that allows two operators to share one Flex-6xxx series transceiver (or one operator use two devices such as a laptop with SmartSDR and a Maestro connected to the same transceiver at the same time)? Given the focus on DX and contesting at Visalia, I?m wondering what the crowd reaction might have been to this newly released capability? >> >> I suspect that while this is a technical achievement, non-contest users are being challenged to determine how exactly multiFLEX works and what advantages it brings to their operating experience. However, there appears to be significant benefits to multi operator contest stations as well as single operator two radio (SO2R) setups, reducing the number of transceivers and associated control boxes/cabling while allowing both two operations using the same transceiver to share the same antenna. >> >> I also suspect that what is driving Flex?s focus on the needs of contest operations is that contest stations spend ?real money? on equipment and software to enhance their competitive advantage. It?ll be interesting to see whether the evolution of technology by Flex using SDR will translate to tangible benefits for the "rest of us? as well as whether other equipment manufacturers respond to these technical enhancements. >> >> 73, >> Barry, WD4ASW >> >>> >>> 73 Bill AE6JV >>> >>> On 4/15/19 at 9:05 PM, k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP) wrote: >>> >>>> Did Elecraft show or hint at anything interesting at the Visalia DX Convention? >>> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Bill Frantz | I don't have high-speed | Periwinkle >>> (408)356-8506 | internet. I have DSL. | 16345 Englewood Ave >>> www.pwpconsult.com | | Los Gatos, CA 95032 >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From frantz at pwpconsult.com Mon Apr 15 20:28:08 2019 From: frantz at pwpconsult.com (Bill Frantz) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:28:08 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia? In-Reply-To: <1D75D7CA-26F7-4AF0-B165-87E813E9835E@mac.com> Message-ID: I didn't spend any time at the Flex booth, although their signas touted SmartSDR Version 3, so I expect they were also talking about multiFlex. While there may not be a lot of use for multiFlex in the normal DX chaser, perhaps except for those stations that really don't want US responses so transmit in the US phone band but listen in the US CW band, there are some interesting uses for DXpeditions. AA7JV was interested in running both CW and FT8 on 160M with one amplifier and transmit antenna. (He said setting up two stations was too much work, and you needed to be running both modes on those "magic nights" when 160 was open.) He described an approach using a Flex in his talk at the Topband dinner and in his ""The RIB: Radio In a Box for DXpeditions" session. The idea of RIB is to put the box in the rare DX with a generator and antenna, and operate it from the boat off shore via UHF based internet, just visiting the DX to set up, service the generator, and tear down. 73 Bill AE6JV On 4/15/19 at 3:01 PM, bbaines at mac.com (Barry Baines) wrote: >Out of curiosity. did Flex Radio Systems tout their new >SmartSDR v3,0.19 featuring ?multiFlex? that allows two >operators to share one Flex-6xxx series transceiver (or one >operator use two devices such as a laptop with SmartSDR and a >Maestro connected to the same transceiver at the same time)? >Given the focus on DX and contesting at Visalia, I?m >wondering what the crowd reaction might have been to this newly >released capability? >I suspect that while this is a technical achievement, >non-contest users are being challenged to determine how exactly >multiFLEX works and what advantages it brings to their >operating experience. However, there appears to be significant >benefits to multi operator contest stations as well as single >operator two radio (SO2R) setups, reducing the number of >transceivers and associated control boxes/cabling while >allowing both two operations using the same transceiver to >share the same antenna. >I also suspect that what is driving Flex?s focus on the needs >of contest operations is that contest stations spend ?real >money? on equipment and software to enhance their competitive >advantage. It?ll be interesting to see whether the evolution >of technology by Flex using SDR will translate to tangible >benefits for the "rest of us? as well as whether other >equipment manufacturers respond to these technical enhancements. >73, >Barry, WD4ASW ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | Since the IBM Selectric, keyboards have gotten 408-356-8506 | steadily worse. Now we have touchscreen keyboards. www.pwpconsult.com | Can we make something even worse? From edauer at law.du.edu Mon Apr 15 21:21:46 2019 From: edauer at law.du.edu (Dauer, Edward) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 01:21:46 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 and WIN10 Message-ID: So, speaking of the K4 . . . When Eric asked a few weeks ago what we might like to have if there were to be a next generation transceiver, near the top of my list was adding whatever it would take to make it unnecessary to connect the transceiver to an outboard computer -- so far as reasonably possible -- ever, for anything. Eric eventually closed that thread and I don't mean to reopen the wider question. But would something along those lines ease the kinds of problems we've been reading about here lately? Ted, KN1CBR ------------------------------ Message: 15 Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 23:49:42 +0000 From: Andy Durbin To: "elecraft at mailman.qth.net" Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Utility and Win 10 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" "Use a USB port on the computer, not on a hub." Why is this restriction imposed on the K3 utility? The KAT500 and KPA500 utilities work fine through my 10 port hub. Andy, k3wyc From w5tm001 at gmail.com Mon Apr 15 21:37:28 2019 From: w5tm001 at gmail.com (Ed gilliland) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 20:37:28 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft P3 - Fixed Tune Mode Message-ID: I am unable to put the P3 in "Fixed Tune Mode", the display remains constant and the VFO A cursor moves across the display. I'm sure that I have something configured incorrectly but haven't been able to discover the error.? I have a RS232 cable from the P3 PC port and a RS232 port on the PC and a cable from the P3 XCVR port to the RJ45 connector on the K3s. Any help would be appreciated. Ed W5TM From dons at ieee.org Mon Apr 15 22:04:59 2019 From: dons at ieee.org (Don Sayler) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 19:04:59 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed In-Reply-To: References: <109921956.760780.1555330939745.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <109921956.760780.1555330939745@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <003b01d4f3f8$ccd07700$66716500$@ieee.org> I use a powered hub with my K3S, no problems. I haven't tried it with an unpowered one. Granted, maybe the KX3 is different... -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Hank Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 8:10 AM To: Raymond Sills; Elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed Ray... I did not realize that!? I did RTFM - I promise.? I guessed I missed that one. It has worked under the 1st configuration ever since I bought the KX3.? One day it changed - I was blaming a Windows update. My K3s is connected to a USB hub external to my desktop PC and works OK - Of course, the K3s is a USB device. Mystery solved!! Hank K4HYJ -----Original Message----- From: "Raymond Sills" To: hbjr at optilink.us Date: 04/15/19 08:22 Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed Hi Hank: It's always been the case when using the Elecraft Utility, that you need to connect the rig directly to your computer, using the Elecraft cable.... with no other devices in line. ?That's why you succeeded with case 3. :) 73 de Ray K2ULR KX3 #211 -----Original Message----- From: HB To: Nr4c ; Andy McMullin Cc: Elecraft list Sent: Sun, Apr 14, 2019 10:17 pm Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed Okay?some weirdness, but I can get the software to work.? Here is what I have done (some help from you guys, some help from the IT guys where I work, and the internet).? It's a little complex? Configuration 1: My laptop is connected via USB to a PK-232SC+ which has a 2 port USB hub built in - my KXUSB is plugged in there.? Under this configuration, no joy with the KX3 Utility recognizing the COM port. Configuration 2: My laptop is connected to the KX3 directly via USB port.? Under this configuration, no joy with the KX3 Utility recognizing the COM port. Configuration 3: My laptop is connected to the KX3 directly via USB port.? Under COM port settings for the KX3USB connected port,? I changed the latency timer to 8 ms from 16 ms.? Under this configuration, the KX3 Utility recognizes the COM port every time. Returning to configuration one with the lower latency timer setting does not allow the KX3 utility to see the com port, so no joy there. BUT - it's a weird BUT - If I connect the KXUSB directly to the laptop, open the utility and connect, disconnect the KX3USB from the laptop and connect it to the hub built in to the PK-232sc+, it works as long as I don't exit the KX3 utility software.? I can even close the serial port in the software, BUT as long as I don't exit the software, I can reopen the serial port and it works fine.? I can close the port and use other software that needs the KXUSB as long as I don't exit the KX3 utility program (just leave it minimized) it works when I need it. How crazy is that?? Any gurus figure that one out?? Hank K4HYJ From: Nr4c Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 3:31 PM To: Andy McMullin Cc: Elecraft list Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed On the FTDI site there is a removal tool. Use it to wipe away com port drivers. Then re-install the FTDI drivers for your KUSB or KXUSB cable. Good luck! Sent from my iPhone ...nr4c. bill > On Apr 14, 2019, at 2:38 PM, Andy McMullin via Elecraft wrote: > > Can I just add that at the stage that says reboot, you should really shut down the machine, wait a bit, then > Restart. Sometimes a USB port is not physically but just logically reset by a reboot. > > I hope this helps > > Regards > Andy, G8TQH > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On 14 Apr 2019, at 18:17, Tom wrote: >> >> Hi, >> Sometimes driver software can be a pain... >> Try this. >> 1) Open the device manager and select the comport by right clicking on it. >> 2) Check the box to delete the driver software and uninstall. >> 3) Unplug the USB cable. >> 4) Reboot >> 5) Next run the FTDI driver installation.? When prompted or when complete, plug the USB cable back in. >> Sometimes, windows will keep reinstalling the same driver if the files have not been deleted. >> 73 Tom >> va2fsq.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of HB >> Sent: April 14, 2019 12:47 PM >> To: donwilh at embarqmail.com; 'Dick Dievendorff' >> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >> >> I have done all of those things and no change.? As I said every other piece of software that needs the KXUSB grabs it and uses it fine - just not the utility software. >> >> There is something to the driver installation - it shows as incomplete, but reinstalling the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website still does not fix the problem.? There is still an event message saying that the installation did not complete. >> >> I realizer this is not an Elecraft issue, I'm just looking for help. >> >> Hank >> K4HYJ >> >> From: Don Wilhelm >> Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 11:09 AM >> To: hbjr at optilink.us; 'Dick Dievendorff' >> Cc: 'Elecraft list' >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KX3 Utility problem: serial port is closed >> >> Hank, >> >> Installing KX3 Utility will do nothing for changing what your computer does about COM Ports vs USB port assignment.? It is now apparent that your computer is not properly recognizing the FTDI USB to Serial adapter. >> >> Download and install the FTDI drivers from the FTDI website. >> What you are trying to deal with is an FTDI USB to Serial adapter.? Just because the KXUSB cable is sold by Elecraft does not c ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From neilz at techie.com Mon Apr 15 22:26:34 2019 From: neilz at techie.com (Neil Zampella) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 22:26:34 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Rework Eliminator Gone in 5 minutes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <03d0a084-b59c-de00-40c0-c91d3f9aa128@techie.com> I need to change from a digest version of the list ... :( Neil, KN3ILZ On 4/15/2019 1:41 PM, EricJ wrote: > Free Rework Eliminator "sold" in 5 minutes. Free really works! > > Eric KE6US > > --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From k6dgw at foothill.net Mon Apr 15 22:28:42 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 19:28:42 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia? In-Reply-To: <1090423612.1440617.1555374148138@mail2.virginmedia.com> References: <1D75D7CA-26F7-4AF0-B165-87E813E9835E@mac.com> <1090423612.1440617.1555374148138@mail2.virginmedia.com> Message-ID: <5ae8c220-0abf-c06f-e520-ee2464802f1f@foothill.net> And, the outcome of the conversation was??? 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/15/2019 5:22 PM, CUTTER DAVID via Elecraft wrote: > I had a nice chat with Eric talking about remoting the P3 > David G3UNA >> On 15 April 2019 at 23:01 Barry Baines via Elecraft wrote: >> >> >> Bill: >> >>> On Apr 15, 2019, at 12:18 AM, Bill Frantz wrote: >>> >>> No. There were the usual show special deals and the KPA1500 was emphasized. The whole conference, including the vendor area, was fairly low key, with nothing new and earth shattering. >> Out of curiosity. did Flex Radio Systems tout their new SmartSDR v3,0.19 featuring ?multiFlex? that allows two operators to share one Flex-6xxx series transceiver (or one operator use two devices such as a laptop with SmartSDR and a Maestro connected to the same transceiver at the same time)? Given the focus on DX and contesting at Visalia, I?m wondering what the crowd reaction might have been to this newly released capability? >> >> I suspect that while this is a technical achievement, non-contest users are being challenged to determine how exactly multiFLEX works and what advantages it brings to their operating experience. However, there appears to be significant benefits to multi operator contest stations as well as single operator two radio (SO2R) setups, reducing the number of transceivers and associated control boxes/cabling while allowing both two operations using the same transceiver to share the same antenna. >> >> I also suspect that what is driving Flex?s focus on the needs of contest operations is that contest stations spend ?real money? on equipment and software to enhance their competitive advantage. It?ll be interesting to see whether the evolution of technology by Flex using SDR will translate to tangible benefits for the "rest of us? as well as whether other equipment manufacturers respond to these technical enhancements. >> >> 73, >> Barry, WD4ASW >> >>> 73 Bill AE6JV >>> >>> On 4/15/19 at 9:05 PM, k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP) wrote: >>> >>>> Did Elecraft show or hint at anything interesting at the Visalia DX Convention? >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> Bill Frantz | I don't have high-speed | Periwinkle >>> (408)356-8506 | internet. I have DSL. | 16345 Englewood Ave >>> www.pwpconsult.com | | Los Gatos, CA 95032 >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rmcgraw at blomand.net Mon Apr 15 22:30:53 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 21:30:53 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Utility and Win 10 In-Reply-To: <708c3b1e-7008-73e9-e36d-434d3414684c@nycap.rr.com> References: <708c3b1e-7008-73e9-e36d-434d3414684c@nycap.rr.com> Message-ID: Make sure your Registry is clean and no fragments from installs and uninstalls exists.??? I use a product called CCleaner, Pro version,? to get rid of junk files and also clean the Registry. That's two different functions. ? There is a free version available. ?? You might be surprised at the crap and junk that's hanging around inside the computer, file wise. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/15/2019 7:09 PM, Bill wrote: > I run everything on hubs - except for the K3.? And, to make matters > worse, updates often upset the computer and a complete reinstall is > needed.? Back up, back up, and back more.? Gotta luv Windows 10!!! > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rwnewbould at comcast.net Mon Apr 15 22:59:04 2019 From: rwnewbould at comcast.net (Rich) Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 22:59:04 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] FW 5.67 Issue Message-ID: <3c9203c5-74ae-9aba-36e9-8f72df8dda7c@comcast.net> My receipt for my K3s shows that I have a KPA3A installed.? So I performed the 6M Gain Reduction procedure as spelled out in the FW 5.67 upgrade instructions.?? I now only have 50w of output on 6M. ? Should I still have 100w on 6M after doing the ATN6? setting? Rich K3RWN From Gary at ka1j.com Tue Apr 16 02:01:01 2019 From: Gary at ka1j.com (Gary Smith) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 02:01:01 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Utility and Win 10 In-Reply-To: <17caf3f8-1454-f2e2-4a19-dbb895853b53@bayland.net> References: <8D.21.08923.F61E4BC5@smtp01.aqua.bos.sync.lan>, <17.43.10887.6DBF4BC5@smtp03.aqua.bos.sync.lan>, <17caf3f8-1454-f2e2-4a19-dbb895853b53@bayland.net> Message-ID: <5CB56F9D.17748.19BD64D3@Gary.ka1j.com> Type Device Manager in your search window. When it opens look for "Ports" write down your existing port numbers. Pull your USB. The number that leaves is your necessary port number. re-attach the USB and now in the utility, go to that port number with the proper baud (38K, 36K, something like that) and you should reconnect Gary KA1J > Using the correct port? > > On 4/15/2019 5:47 PM, w4sc wrote: > > Using FTDI USB from Elecraft, FTDI latest drivers, No HUB, Works > > with win7, does not work with Win10. > > > > Going back to Win 7. > > > > Ben > > > > Sent from Mail for Windows 10 > > > > From: Don Wilhelm > > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 4:16 PM > > To: w4sc; Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Utility and Win 10 > > > > Are you using a USB to serial adapter? If so, have you downloaded > > and installed the latest drivers for that adapter (if the Elecraft > > KUSB the drivers are from FTDI). Reboot the computer after > > installation. > > > > Use a USB port on the computer, not on a hub. > > > > 73, > > Don W3FPR > > > > On 4/15/2019 3:54 PM, w4sc wrote: > >> Having trouble with Win10 and K3 Utility communicating with K3. > >> Latest K3 utility, and have tried 2 different Win10 machines, all > >> latest updates. Tried lower/higher speeds, no joy. Works FB win7. > >> (tnx again Microsoft!!) Ideas anyone?? > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From hillslaird at internode.on.net Tue Apr 16 03:57:41 2019 From: hillslaird at internode.on.net (Kev Schache) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 17:27:41 +0930 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 and FreeDV Message-ID: <4d2f717f-e06e-4dc8-7a0d-2bd5f7c52134@internode.on.net> Not knowing anything about digital modes, I've become intrigued by FreeDV and figured that maybe I should? give it a go.? I've read a bit, watched some relevant YouTube,? re-read Don's (W3FPR) article on his website and figured I'll need an external sound card.? I've also checked out the FreeDV website and downloaded the software.? Now I'm looking at SignaLink and also West Mountain Radio RIGblaster.? The facts are though, I haven't got much of a clue, so any help will be great. Has anyone used either of these products with the KX3 for FreeDV?? Any recommendations ? Thanks to all in advance 73??? Kev???? VK5KS From jimk0xu at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 04:14:05 2019 From: jimk0xu at gmail.com (Jim Rhodes) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 03:14:05 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 and FreeDV In-Reply-To: <4d2f717f-e06e-4dc8-7a0d-2bd5f7c52134@internode.on.net> References: <4d2f717f-e06e-4dc8-7a0d-2bd5f7c52134@internode.on.net> Message-ID: An inexpensive USB sound card (look for one with line in) say about $15(US) and a couple of audio cables is all you need. Set your levels (4 bars with 5th flashing on transmit, best decode on receive) and away you go. I am not familiar with FreeDV, if it has the ability to do PTT over com port you can key with that, otherwise you can set up VOX. KX3 does not do FSK, you have to use AFSK. Not a big deal, just keep an eye on the transmit level. On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 2:58 AM Kev Schache wrote: > Not knowing anything about digital modes, I've become intrigued by > FreeDV and figured that maybe I should give it a go. I've read a bit, > watched some relevant YouTube, re-read Don's (W3FPR) article on his > website and figured I'll need an external sound card. I've also checked > out the FreeDV website and downloaded the software. Now I'm looking at > SignaLink and also West Mountain Radio RIGblaster. The facts are > though, I haven't got much of a clue, so any help will be great. > > Has anyone used either of these products with the KX3 for FreeDV? Any > recommendations ? > > Thanks to all in advance > > 73 Kev VK5KS > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- Jim K0XU jim at rhodesend.net From turnbull at net1.ie Tue Apr 16 07:07:27 2019 From: turnbull at net1.ie (Doug Turnbull) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:07:27 -0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question In-Reply-To: <9702e3ab-30a4-53b8-d84f-1464ea217c94@blomand.net> References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <9702e3ab-30a4-53b8-d84f-1464ea217c94@blomand.net> Message-ID: <6D189F55D1654874B4648304BA50F2DC@DougTPC> Bob, May I ask you a further question, please? Do I need any additional software for the interface from the K3 serial port to the PC using either RS232 or USB and an adaptor? I understand that the SignaLink may not itself be required but am going to proceed with it anyway. I would like to make sure that WSJTX can shift the frequency and band for FT8. Thank you for your help. 73 Doug EI2CN -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bob McGraw K4TAX Sent: 15 April 2019 15:47 To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question The? Signalink? provides only the audio path to / from the computer and radio. You will need either the RS232 or USB interface between the radio and computer to handle the frequency control and PTT command. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/15/2019 9:03 AM, Doug Turnbull wrote: > Dear OMs and YLs, > I am going to help a friend get onto FT8. He has a new Tigertronics > SignaLink, with the header for the K3 and appropriate cables for the K3. > This however does not in and of itself provide the ability to shift band or > frequency in the case of Fox Hound mode. > > Is it correct to say that a cable from the K3 RS232 port possibly via > the P3 to the PC is all that is required to gain this frequency shifting > capability. The software being used other than what comes with the > SignaLink is standard WSJTX Version 2.? from K1JT's stable. > > I use FT8 some here but have a MicroKeyer II. This is my first time > using a SignaLink. Your guidance is appreciated. Thank you in > advance. > > 73 Doug EI2CN > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From indians at xsmail.com Tue Apr 16 09:10:32 2019 From: indians at xsmail.com (Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 06:10:32 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question In-Reply-To: <6D189F55D1654874B4648304BA50F2DC@DougTPC> References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <9702e3ab-30a4-53b8-d84f-1464ea217c94@blomand.net> <6D189F55D1654874B4648304BA50F2DC@DougTPC> Message-ID: <1555420232926-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Hi folks, can you split the threads? It has nothing to do with originally launched Hamradio/K1 TX part repairing thread please. Thanks, ----- 73 - Petr, OK1RP "Apple & Elecraft freak" B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com MeWe: https://bit.ly/2HGPoDx MeWe: https://bit.ly/2FmwvDt -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From turnbull at net1.ie Tue Apr 16 09:16:34 2019 From: turnbull at net1.ie (Doug Turnbull) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:16:34 -0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question In-Reply-To: <1555420232926-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com><9702e3ab-30a4-53b8-d84f-1464ea217c94@blomand.net><6D189F55D1654874B4648304BA50F2DC@DougTPC> <1555420232926-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Petr, I have no idea how the threads are combined. I initiated this question without any reference to the K1 and used the title above which does not mention the K1. I am trying to resolve a problem not cause one. My interest it that when visiting a friend in USA that I can get him up and running with his K3 and his new SignaLink on FT8. My specific concern is with WSJTX controlling the frequency. Sorry for any trouble cause your good self. 73 Doug EI2CN -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS Sent: 16 April 2019 13:11 To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question Hi folks, can you split the threads? It has nothing to do with originally launched Hamradio/K1 TX part repairing thread please. Thanks, ----- 73 - Petr, OK1RP "Apple & Elecraft freak" B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com MeWe: https://bit.ly/2HGPoDx MeWe: https://bit.ly/2FmwvDt -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From indians at xsmail.com Tue Apr 16 09:17:04 2019 From: indians at xsmail.com (Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 06:17:04 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] [K1] TX part sick In-Reply-To: References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1555420624328-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Don, I checked other parts in TX section and it seems to be ok (refer to manual 2000 Rev. D). Just removed the 5th turn on secondary winding of T3. Is there something else strange or danger which I should check in order to avoid smoke during the test or even blowing the final please? Many thanks mate, Petr ----- 73 - Petr, OK1RP "Apple & Elecraft freak" B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com MeWe: https://bit.ly/2HGPoDx MeWe: https://bit.ly/2FmwvDt -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From jfrake73 at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 10:04:15 2019 From: jfrake73 at gmail.com (jack frake) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:04:15 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Wanted K2 In-Reply-To: <414758418.1165828.1555373299740@mail.yahoo.com> References: <414758418.1165828.1555373299740.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <414758418.1165828.1555373299740@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Well, I do have one. However, since I'm so fond of my little radio, the price would be 15,750 US dollars and you pay for shipping.... :*) On Mon, Apr 15, 2019, 8:08 PM Albert Little Hi > Does anyone have a K2/10 for sale with antenna tuner and ssb ? > Thanks, > AlbertW5APL > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From d.cutter at ntlworld.com Tue Apr 16 10:17:07 2019 From: d.cutter at ntlworld.com (CUTTER DAVID) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:17:07 +0100 (BST) Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia? In-Reply-To: <5ae8c220-0abf-c06f-e520-ee2464802f1f@foothill.net> References: <1D75D7CA-26F7-4AF0-B165-87E813E9835E@mac.com> <1090423612.1440617.1555374148138@mail2.virginmedia.com> <5ae8c220-0abf-c06f-e520-ee2464802f1f@foothill.net> Message-ID: <1482924554.1470379.1555424227514@mail2.virginmedia.com> From donwilh at embarqmail.com Tue Apr 16 10:55:25 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:55:25 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] [K1] TX part sick In-Reply-To: <1555420624328-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <1555420624328-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <286029a9-52f5-93f4-f4f4-a61c36a20a34@embarqmail.com> Petr. Turn that manual to Appendix E near the back. And on page 6 of that Appendix, you will find Transmitter Signal Tracing. Set up the K1 as instructed there, and no damage will be done. Then make the measurements in the order listed. You will need an RF probe. If you are using an oscilloscope (with a 10X probe), multiply the expected values by 2.8 to obtain the expected peak to peak RF voltage measurements. At the FIRST measurement that is significantly less than the expected value (expect as much as a 10% variation before saying it is significant) you have reached the output of the failing stage. Correct that stage and move onward to the next failure point. That is the procedure required to determine why it is not working. If the final is blown, replace it with the K1PAKIT from Elecraft. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/16/2019 9:17 AM, Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS wrote: > Don, > > I checked other parts in TX section and it seems to be ok (refer to manual > 2000 Rev. D). Just removed the 5th turn on secondary winding of T3. > > Is there something else strange or danger which I should check in order to > avoid smoke during the test or even blowing the final please? > > Many thanks mate, > > Petr > > > > > ----- > 73 - Petr, OK1RP > "Apple & Elecraft freak" > B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com > MeWe: https://bit.ly/2HGPoDx > MeWe: https://bit.ly/2FmwvDt > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From d.cutter at ntlworld.com Tue Apr 16 11:33:35 2019 From: d.cutter at ntlworld.com (CUTTER DAVID) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:33:35 +0100 (BST) Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia? In-Reply-To: <5ae8c220-0abf-c06f-e520-ee2464802f1f@foothill.net> References: <1D75D7CA-26F7-4AF0-B165-87E813E9835E@mac.com> <1090423612.1440617.1555374148138@mail2.virginmedia.com> <5ae8c220-0abf-c06f-e520-ee2464802f1f@foothill.net> Message-ID: <760434373.1459649.1555428815180@mail2.virginmedia.com> Sorry for the delay answering, we're on holiday and the Iphoney thing is not easy with my fingers. Essentially, add a video capture box to the the vga output from the P3 and send that with the radio data. Don't ask me any more, I just don't know. The main thing is you don't need a camera to look at the P3 screen which would lose resolution and seems very clunky to me. Looking forward to doing this in the next month or 2. Eric gave me his card to call him when I'm ready. He was demonstrating the system at the show via hotel WiFi which kept dropping. David G3UNA > On 16 April 2019 at 03:28 Fred Jensen wrote: > > > And, the outcome of the conversation was??? > > 73, > Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW > Sparks NV DM09dn > Washoe County > > On 4/15/2019 5:22 PM, CUTTER DAVID via Elecraft wrote: > > I had a nice chat with Eric talking about remoting the P3 > > David G3UNA > >> On 15 April 2019 at 23:01 Barry Baines via Elecraft wrote: > >> > >> > >> Bill: > >> > >>> On Apr 15, 2019, at 12:18 AM, Bill Frantz wrote: > >>> > >>> No. There were the usual show special deals and the KPA1500 was emphasized. The whole conference, including the vendor area, was fairly low key, with nothing new and earth shattering. > >> Out of curiosity. did Flex Radio Systems tout their new SmartSDR v3,0.19 featuring ?multiFlex? that allows two operators to share one Flex-6xxx series transceiver (or one operator use two devices such as a laptop with SmartSDR and a Maestro connected to the same transceiver at the same time)? Given the focus on DX and contesting at Visalia, I?m wondering what the crowd reaction might have been to this newly released capability? > >> > >> I suspect that while this is a technical achievement, non-contest users are being challenged to determine how exactly multiFLEX works and what advantages it brings to their operating experience. However, there appears to be significant benefits to multi operator contest stations as well as single operator two radio (SO2R) setups, reducing the number of transceivers and associated control boxes/cabling while allowing both two operations using the same transceiver to share the same antenna. > >> > >> I also suspect that what is driving Flex?s focus on the needs of contest operations is that contest stations spend ?real money? on equipment and software to enhance their competitive advantage. It?ll be interesting to see whether the evolution of technology by Flex using SDR will translate to tangible benefits for the "rest of us? as well as whether other equipment manufacturers respond to these technical enhancements. > >> > >> 73, > >> Barry, WD4ASW > >> > >>> 73 Bill AE6JV > >>> > >>> On 4/15/19 at 9:05 PM, k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP) wrote: > >>> > >>>> Did Elecraft show or hint at anything interesting at the Visalia DX Convention? > >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> Bill Frantz | I don't have high-speed | Periwinkle > >>> (408)356-8506 | internet. I have DSL. | 16345 Englewood Ave > >>> www.pwpconsult.com | | Los Gatos, CA 95032 > >>> > >>> ______________________________________________________________ > >>> Elecraft mailing list > >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > >>> > >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > >> ______________________________________________________________ > >> Elecraft mailing list > >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > >> > >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From barrylazar2 at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 11:35:22 2019 From: barrylazar2 at gmail.com (Barry) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:35:22 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question In-Reply-To: References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <9702e3ab-30a4-53b8-d84f-1464ea217c94@blomand.net> <6D189F55D1654874B4648304BA50F2DC@dougtpc> <1555420232926-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Doug, To try and get you an answer, I offer the following. The SignaLink requires NO software for itself. It will show up as a USB CODEC. It is this that you need to tell WSJTX that you want to use. That solves the audio issue. Frequency will be controlled by WSJTX if you tell it what radio you are using, port it is on, and port data rate and format. The latter is usually 38400 and 8N1 and the port number available from the computer's device manager. To transmit, use the VOX on the radio and nothing else is required except to set the levels and make sure you are in DATA A mode. Have fun. 73, Barry K3NDM ------ Original Message ------ From: "Doug Turnbull" To: "Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS" ; elecraft at mailman.qth.net Sent: 4/16/2019 9:16:34 AM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question >Petr, I have no idea how the threads are combined. I initiated this >question without any reference to the K1 and used the title above which does >not mention the K1. I am trying to resolve a problem not cause one. My >interest it that when visiting a friend in USA that I can get him up and >running with his K3 and his new SignaLink on FT8. My specific concern is >with WSJTX controlling the frequency. Sorry for any trouble cause your >good self. > > 73 Doug EI2CN > >-----Original Message----- >From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net >[mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS >Sent: 16 April 2019 13:11 >To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net >Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question > >Hi folks, > >can you split the threads? > >It has nothing to do with originally launched Hamradio/K1 TX part repairing >thread please. > >Thanks, > > > >----- >73 - Petr, OK1RP >"Apple & Elecraft freak" >B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com >MeWe: https://bit.ly/2HGPoDx >MeWe: https://bit.ly/2FmwvDt >-- >Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From lmarion at mt.net Tue Apr 16 11:38:07 2019 From: lmarion at mt.net (lmarion) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:38:07 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] Wanted K2 In-Reply-To: References: <414758418.1165828.1555373299740.ref@mail.yahoo.com><414758418.1165828.1555373299740@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2A1B7BDC42F34AAABB9872640B418A78@LeroyPC> Been building/home brewing since I was 11. K2 sn40 was the most fun radio building experience of my life, with K1, KX1 ,KX2, KX3 and others being the frosting on the cake. K2 still monitors 6 meters with the transverter , as the K3S is in the main position now, where Wayne's Sierra was way back when now. Thanks for making it fun guys. Leroy AB7CE -----Original Message----- From: jack frake Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 8:04 AM To: Albert Little Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Wanted K2 Well, I do have one. However, since I'm so fond of my little radio, the price would be 15,750 US dollars and you pay for shipping.... :*) On Mon, Apr 15, 2019, 8:08 PM Albert Little Hi > Does anyone have a K2/10 for sale with antenna tuner and ssb ? > Thanks, > AlbertW5APL > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jackbrindle at me.com Tue Apr 16 11:46:14 2019 From: jackbrindle at me.com (Jack Brindle) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 08:46:14 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question In-Reply-To: References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <9702e3ab-30a4-53b8-d84f-1464ea217c94@blomand.net> <6D189F55D1654874B4648304BA50F2DC@dougtpc> <1555420232926-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <401E5958-8781-4628-AECA-3842D3BD0C14@me.com> This is close. As others have stated, two adapters are required. One is the Signalink (or other audio interface). The second is a serial adapter, preferably based on an FTDI chip. I believe it is the second you are really asking about. The serial adapter provides the actual control communications between the computer and the K3. It is the same interface you would have used for updating K3 firmware or otherwise controlling the K3 from the computer. The Signalink should do a good job providing the sound interface needed for FT8 with the K3. There are other less expensive solutions (and several that cost more as well), but since you already have the Signalink, use it! WSJTX is relatively easy to get going, but you will want to read the manual to be able to understand and set the various details in the program. Just select the audio interface and the serial port in the WSJTX settings dialog and things should start working quickly. After you start playing, you will have more questions. 73! Jack, W6FB > On Apr 16, 2019, at 8:35 AM, Barry wrote: > > Doug, > To try and get you an answer, I offer the following. The SignaLink requires NO software for itself. It will show up as a USB CODEC. It is this that you need to tell WSJTX that you want to use. That solves the audio issue. Frequency will be controlled by WSJTX if you tell it what radio you are using, port it is on, and port data rate and format. The latter is usually 38400 and 8N1 and the port number available from the computer's device manager. To transmit, use the VOX on the radio and nothing else is required except to set the levels and make sure you are in DATA A mode. Have fun. > > 73, > Barry > K3NDM > > ------ Original Message ------ > From: "Doug Turnbull" > To: "Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS" ; elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Sent: 4/16/2019 9:16:34 AM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question > >> Petr, I have no idea how the threads are combined. I initiated this >> question without any reference to the K1 and used the title above which does >> not mention the K1. I am trying to resolve a problem not cause one. My >> interest it that when visiting a friend in USA that I can get him up and >> running with his K3 and his new SignaLink on FT8. My specific concern is >> with WSJTX controlling the frequency. Sorry for any trouble cause your >> good self. >> >> 73 Doug EI2CN >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net >> [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS >> Sent: 16 April 2019 13:11 >> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 SignaLink & FT8 Question >> >> Hi folks, >> >> can you split the threads? >> >> It has nothing to do with originally launched Hamradio/K1 TX part repairing >> thread please. >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> ----- >> 73 - Petr, OK1RP >> "Apple & Elecraft freak" >> B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com >> MeWe: https://bit.ly/2HGPoDx >> MeWe: https://bit.ly/2FmwvDt >> -- >> Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From n6kr at elecraft.com Tue Apr 16 11:56:26 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 08:56:26 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft's philosophy of community input on product design Message-ID: It has often been stated, by both Elecraft and our customers, that we leverage user input as we flesh out new products. In this article I'll clarify our development model, hopefully elevating it above hearsay. It's intentional and methodical. We like to think it's one of the things that makes Elecraft unique among well-known amateur radio brands. * * * The design of commercial gear is subject to many constraints. It has to meet user expectations, earn type acceptance, do well in performance benchmarks, and yet be fairly priced. To varying degrees it must also satisfy a universal requirement for communications gear: it should be usable during emergencies to support local or regional traffic. (For some of us, knowing we might be called upon as the last resort in difficult times motivates us to keep our equipment and skills fresh.) Most use of our gear is by hobbyists, so an additional set of requirements comes into play. For example, a radio has to be enjoyable to operate. If it's a kit, it must be rewarding and educational to build. We take this two steps further. First, we believe that our customers -- the real experts when it comes to using ham gear -- are a rich source of creative and technical input. Second, we recognize that since this is a hobby, the road is just as important as the destination. In other words, we want to share the *process* of product design with our customers, not just plant a stake in the ground and say "this is what we've done; take it or leave it." To this end, at the onset of a new product cycle we imagine the hardware and firmware as an elastic canvas upon which we and our customers can sketch and refine ideas. This means products must be endowed with a great degree of modularity; we have to leave spaces that can be filled in the future, firing the imagination of users. Here's a musical analogy: If you've ever listened to jazz trumpeter Miles Davis play, you'll notice some gaps between his phrases. These allow listeners to engage with his music, completing their part of the conversation. The result? You work a bit harder at it, but come away more satisfied. (Don't get me started on the Key of Morse.) What this means in practice is that we take continuous customer input, weight it, adjust firmware implementation priority, and revise or extend hardware over time. Let me give you two examples of how this has played out. K2 The K2 was the test case for our "canvas" development model. To ensure flexibility, we designed intermodule communications around a 1-wire bus -- the auxBus -- which we routed to every option connector in the radio. These connectors were strategically distributed to nodes where they could pick up supply voltages, control, and RF or audio paths. The idea was that each module would have its own small MCU, hanging on the auxBus, where it could exchange information with the main MCU. We then started shipping the K2 to early adopters, soliciting their input on what they'd like to see next. I can't claim that this process was entirely democratic, and in truth it was messy at times. But the upshot was that we quickly followed with new K2 options and firmware features in an order that gave users a vote. When 60 meters came on the scene, we added a module for that as well. Here's where the auxBus comes in: On power-up, each option module checks in with the main MCU, reporting its status. But the MCU needn't know every detail of how modules function. For example, when you go into the menu entry for the K2's ATU (KAT2), the text for the various settings is supplied by the KAT2's own MCU, over the auxBus. If you update the ATU module to one that has different settings, the main MCU doesn't have to be updated -- just the KAT2 itself. The main MCU thus functions as a "server" for semantic information supplied by each of the option modules. The K2 is also an exemplar of hardware flexibility, embodied in something we called the 2D fastener. This is a short length of 1/4" aluminum bar with three tapped 4-40 holes that permits attachment of PC boards, sheet metal, and hardware. Over the years we and our customers have taken advantage of 2D fasteners to upgrade or enhance products. Our seafaring customers helped us migrate to all stainless-steel hardware at some point, facilitated by 2D fasteners as generic attachment points. Shortly after we thought we'd fully populated the K2 with options, we were contacted by Lyle Johnson, KK7P. Lyle had reverse-engineered the auxBus node associated with our KAF2 analog audio filter module, where he inserted his own: the KDSP2, a DSP-based audio filter complete with noise reduction. This is an extreme case of tapping community creativity. In addition to adding the KDSP2 to our product line, we added Lyle to our engineering staff. One final note about the K2 and extensibility. Once we had accumulated a number of useful upgrades, we created an "A" to "B" conversion kit. This was the genesis of our promise to provide an upgrade path for every owner of our transceivers so they can remain current. K3 The K3, with its larger MCU and plenty of interior space, has benefitted from many suggestions by its user base over the 10 years since initial release. We phased in a high-performance sub receiver, 2 meter transverter, enhanced ATU, DVR, SWL band-pass filter array, reference lock module, USB port for control/audio, and most significantly, an entirely new synthesizer design. As the phrase "competition-grade" evolved, the K3 continued to set the standard. Accessories have been added to the K-Line based on customer needs as well -- the P3 panadapter, KPA500 amp, KAT500 ATU, SP4 speaker, and K-Pod remote controller. All of these new modules and accessories were accompanied by hundreds of free firmware upgrades. Like the K2, the K3 underwent one major face-lift, in the form of the K3S. In keeping with our model, we offered just about everything but the "K3S" front panel bezel to those who wanted the latest in Elecraft tech. * * * Our first two decades have been a time of challenge, opportunity, and satisfaction for our team. Reflecting on this time, we need to thank our customers not just for their creativity and enthusiasm, but also for their patience. We've traveled the road together, bumps, potholes and all, and I hope you've all enjoyed the ride as much as we have. It goes without saying that our future products will continue to reflect our philosophy of community involvement and "hands-on" design. Here at Elecraft headquarters, we're already raising a toast to the next decade. Wayne, N6KR From n7wy at rocketmail.com Tue Apr 16 12:26:19 2019 From: n7wy at rocketmail.com (Robert Rennard) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 10:26:19 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 and WIN10 Message-ID: I believe that putting WIN10 hardware in the radio will be a benefit to the OEM. It will make the radio become obsolete faster and allow more sales for upgrades. Maestro, SunSDR, and Anan MK II radios all have Win10 PCs embedded. Those radios? embedded PCs are all obsolete already. Consider how much pain it is to deal with Windows 10 updates. I am sure the radio OEMs are paranoid, or at least I would be were I one of them. When you have a widely deployed product that suddenly stops working because of an update, the pain is intense and expensive to cure. How about an Intel NUC instead of a PC ? They were used on Heard and Ducie rather than using laptops. Even NUCs do not support IPA 4K monitors, yet. Bob R From Gary at ka1j.com Tue Apr 16 12:37:01 2019 From: Gary at ka1j.com (Gary Smith) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:37:01 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft's philosophy of community input on product design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5CB604AD.23464.1C03A642@Gary.ka1j.com> Well worded & Thank you for the perspective. 73, Gary KA1J > It has often been stated, by both Elecraft and our customers, that we > leverage user input as we flesh out new products. In this article I'll > clarify our development model, hopefully elevating it above hearsay. > It's intentional and methodical. We like to think it's one of the > things that makes Elecraft unique among well-known amateur radio > brands. > > * * * > > The design of commercial gear is subject to many constraints. It has > to meet user expectations, earn type acceptance, do well in > performance benchmarks, and yet be fairly priced. To varying degrees > it must also satisfy a universal requirement for communications gear: > it should be usable during emergencies to support local or regional > traffic. (For some of us, knowing we might be called upon as the last > resort in difficult times motivates us to keep our equipment and > skills fresh.) > > Most use of our gear is by hobbyists, so an additional set of > requirements comes into play. For example, a radio has to be enjoyable > to operate. If it's a kit, it must be rewarding and educational to > build. > > We take this two steps further. > > First, we believe that our customers -- the real experts when it comes > to using ham gear -- are a rich source of creative and technical > input. Second, we recognize that since this is a hobby, the road is > just as important as the destination. In other words, we want to share > the *process* of product design with our customers, not just plant a > stake in the ground and say "this is what we've done; take it or leave > it." > > To this end, at the onset of a new product cycle we imagine the > hardware and firmware as an elastic canvas upon which we and our > customers can sketch and refine ideas. This means products must be > endowed with a great degree of modularity; we have to leave spaces > that can be filled in the future, firing the imagination of users. > Here's a musical analogy: If you've ever listened to jazz trumpeter > Miles Davis play, you'll notice some gaps between his phrases. These > allow listeners to engage with his music, completing their part of the > conversation. The result? You work a bit harder at it, but come away > more satisfied. (Don't get me started on the Key of Morse.) > > What this means in practice is that we take continuous customer input, > weight it, adjust firmware implementation priority, and revise or > extend hardware over time. Let me give you two examples of how this > has played out. > > K2 > > The K2 was the test case for our "canvas" development model. To ensure > flexibility, we designed intermodule communications around a 1-wire > bus -- the auxBus -- which we routed to every option connector in the > radio. These connectors were strategically distributed to nodes where > they could pick up supply voltages, control, and RF or audio paths. > The idea was that each module would have its own small MCU, hanging on > the auxBus, where it could exchange information with the main MCU. > > We then started shipping the K2 to early adopters, soliciting their > input on what they'd like to see next. I can't claim that this process > was entirely democratic, and in truth it was messy at times. But the > upshot was that we quickly followed with new K2 options and firmware > features in an order that gave users a vote. When 60 meters came on > the scene, we added a module for that as well. > > Here's where the auxBus comes in: On power-up, each option module > checks in with the main MCU, reporting its status. But the MCU needn't > know every detail of how modules function. For example, when you go > into the menu entry for the K2's ATU (KAT2), the text for the various > settings is supplied by the KAT2's own MCU, over the auxBus. If you > update the ATU module to one that has different settings, the main MCU > doesn't have to be updated -- just the KAT2 itself. The main MCU thus > functions as a "server" for semantic information supplied by each of > the option modules. > > The K2 is also an exemplar of hardware flexibility, embodied in > something we called the 2D fastener. This is a short length of 1/4" > aluminum bar with three tapped 4-40 holes that permits attachment of > PC boards, sheet metal, and hardware. Over the years we and our > customers have taken advantage of 2D fasteners to upgrade or enhance > products. Our seafaring customers helped us migrate to all > stainless-steel hardware at some point, facilitated by 2D fasteners as > generic attachment points. > > Shortly after we thought we'd fully populated the K2 with options, we > were contacted by Lyle Johnson, KK7P. Lyle had reverse-engineered the > auxBus node associated with our KAF2 analog audio filter module, where > he inserted his own: the KDSP2, a DSP-based audio filter complete with > noise reduction. This is an extreme case of tapping community > creativity. In addition to adding the KDSP2 to our product line, we > added Lyle to our engineering staff. > > One final note about the K2 and extensibility. Once we had accumulated > a number of useful upgrades, we created an "A" to "B" conversion kit. > This was the genesis of our promise to provide an upgrade path for > every owner of our transceivers so they can remain current. > > K3 > > The K3, with its larger MCU and plenty of interior space, has > benefitted from many suggestions by its user base over the 10 years > since initial release. We phased in a high-performance sub receiver, 2 > meter transverter, enhanced ATU, DVR, SWL band-pass filter array, > reference lock module, USB port for control/audio, and most > significantly, an entirely new synthesizer design. As the phrase > "competition-grade" evolved, the K3 continued to set the standard. > > Accessories have been added to the K-Line based on customer needs as > well -- the P3 panadapter, KPA500 amp, KAT500 ATU, SP4 speaker, and > K-Pod remote controller. All of these new modules and accessories were > accompanied by hundreds of free firmware upgrades. > > Like the K2, the K3 underwent one major face-lift, in the form of the > K3S. In keeping with our model, we offered just about everything but > the "K3S" front panel bezel to those who wanted the latest in Elecraft > tech. > > * * * > > Our first two decades have been a time of challenge, opportunity, and > satisfaction for our team. Reflecting on this time, we need to thank > our customers not just for their creativity and enthusiasm, but also > for their patience. We've traveled the road together, bumps, potholes > and all, and I hope you've all enjoyed the ride as much as we have. > > It goes without saying that our future products will continue to > reflect our philosophy of community involvement and "hands-on" design. > > > Here at Elecraft headquarters, we're already raising a toast to the > next decade. > > Wayne, N6KR > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From billamader at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 12:55:42 2019 From: billamader at gmail.com (K8TE) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:55:42 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] K3 and WIN10 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1555433742089-0.post@n2.nabble.com> It's already possible to use a K3 without a computer. I've done that in the middle of a contest when I had to re-boot my computer. I logged on paper until I had access to the log when I added those contacts. Regarding computer-related problems, having provided on-line and telephone tech support for Gateway, the majority of troubles with which I helped were user-induced. I liken the issue to when I had responsibility for a small phone system--lack of knowledge on using that "tool." I assert we need to have sufficient knowledge to operate and maintain our computers, just like our radios. Sometimes we need to seek help from others, often found on this list. I also assert too many ops aren't conversant with their equipment and much less with their equipment manuals. Of course, we all do dumb things and I am near the top of that list. Still, I update my PDF manuals and make use of them. For Windows, Google is your friend. It is more useful than trying to find help on Microsoft's web site, in my experience. I use electronic loggers for many reasons. Except for the fine products at QRPWorks, I use a computer and the appropriate logger. I am a keyboard wiz and can type much faster than I can print. BTW, I have often used the K3 Utility with a USB hub. But, not all USB hubs are created equal and I always bypass a hub when troubleshooting connectivity issues. I would rather have the K4 firmware space used for features rather than replacing functions best done on a computer or other external device. It is 2019 and computers belong in our shacks, IMHO. On SOTA peaks, that may be a different story. Still, I prefer a non-radio solution for logging, like a notebook computer, than having a logger in my radio. Save that battery for operating! Just my humble (or not) opinion. BTW, I enjoyed several conversations with Elecraft personnel at the IDXC this weekend and with Bill, AE6JV. I also noticed WA6HHQ on APRS. It was an excellent convention once again and I hope the plans to move it to the Wyndham next year revert back to the Visalia Convention Center with its larger facilities. 73, Bill, K8TE So, speaking of the K4 . . . When Eric asked a few weeks ago what we might like to have if there were to be a next generation transceiver, near the top of my list was adding whatever it would take to make it unnecessary to connect the transceiver to an outboard computer -- so far as reasonably possible -- ever, for anything. Eric eventually closed that thread and I don't mean to reopen the wider question. But would something along those lines ease the kinds of problems we've been reading about here lately? Ted, KN1CBR -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From rmcgraw at blomand.net Tue Apr 16 13:15:48 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:15:48 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 and WIN10 In-Reply-To: <20190416162629.D6040149B16E@mailman.qth.net> References: <20190416162629.D6040149B16E@mailman.qth.net> Message-ID: <0DEA1905-8283-4178-AE41-0A092B23968B@blomand.net> PLEASE! No operating system embedded in the radio. Almost like ice cream, there is more than one flavor. As to Windows 10 updates, configure for automatic, let it do its thing, and don't mess with the parameters. It is so easy and reliable. Don't make it complicated by trying to run it yourself. You also need to maintain a "clean" computer with regular Cache and Registry cleaning. Leftover and fragments may over ride new updates. Also Virus and Malware issues may interfere with correct operation. Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 16, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Robert Rennard via Elecraft wrote: > > I believe that putting WIN10 hardware in the radio will be a benefit to the OEM. It will make the radio become obsolete faster and allow more sales for upgrades. > > Maestro, SunSDR, and Anan MK II radios all have Win10 PCs embedded. Those radios? embedded PCs are all obsolete already. > Consider how much pain it is to deal with Windows 10 updates. I am sure the radio OEMs are paranoid, or at least I would be were I one of them. When you have a widely deployed product that suddenly stops working because of an update, the pain is intense and expensive to cure. > > How about an Intel NUC instead of a PC ? They were used on Heard and Ducie rather than using laptops. Even NUCs do not support IPA 4K monitors, yet. > > Bob R > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From n6kr at elecraft.com Tue Apr 16 14:40:28 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 11:40:28 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 and WIN10 In-Reply-To: <0DEA1905-8283-4178-AE41-0A092B23968B@blomand.net> References: <20190416162629.D6040149B16E@mailman.qth.net> <0DEA1905-8283-4178-AE41-0A092B23968B@blomand.net> Message-ID: We will never, ever put any incarnation of Windows in a radio. Wayne N6KR ---- elecraft.com > On Apr 16, 2019, at 10:15 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > > PLEASE! No operating system embedded in the radio. Almost like ice cream, there is more than one flavor. > > As to Windows 10 updates, configure for automatic, let it do its thing, and don't mess with the parameters. It is so easy and reliable. Don't make it complicated by trying to run it yourself. > > You also need to maintain a "clean" computer with regular Cache and Registry cleaning. Leftover and fragments may over ride new updates. Also Virus and Malware issues may interfere with correct operation. > > Bob, K4TAX > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 16, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Robert Rennard via Elecraft wrote: >> >> I believe that putting WIN10 hardware in the radio will be a benefit to the OEM. It will make the radio become obsolete faster and allow more sales for upgrades. >> >> Maestro, SunSDR, and Anan MK II radios all have Win10 PCs embedded. Those radios? embedded PCs are all obsolete already. >> Consider how much pain it is to deal with Windows 10 updates. I am sure the radio OEMs are paranoid, or at least I would be were I one of them. When you have a widely deployed product that suddenly stops working because of an update, the pain is intense and expensive to cure. >> >> How about an Intel NUC instead of a PC ? They were used on Heard and Ducie rather than using laptops. Even NUCs do not support IPA 4K monitors, yet. >> >> Bob R >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From edauer at law.du.edu Tue Apr 16 14:44:44 2019 From: edauer at law.du.edu (Dauer, Edward) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:44:44 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 and WIN10 In-Reply-To: <9AD50CD1-346A-48C7-B666-06E1A651A1FA@law.du.edu> References: <20190416162629.D6040149B16E@mailman.qth.net> <0DEA1905-8283-4178-AE41-0A092B23968B@blomand.net> <9AD50CD1-346A-48C7-B666-06E1A651A1FA@law.du.edu> Message-ID: OK, I move to strike my own prior motion. Ted, KN1CBR Edward A. Dauer Dean Emeritus and Professor Emeritus of Law University of Denver From: Wayne Burdick Date: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 12:40 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 and WIN10 We will never, ever put any incarnation of Windows in a radio. Wayne N6KR ---- elecraft.com On Apr 16, 2019, at 10:15 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX > wrote: PLEASE! No operating system embedded in the radio. Almost like ice cream, there is more than one flavor. As to Windows 10 updates, configure for automatic, let it do its thing, and don't mess with the parameters. It is so easy and reliable. Don't make it complicated by trying to run it yourself. You also need to maintain a "clean" computer with regular Cache and Registry cleaning. Leftover and fragments may over ride new updates. Also Virus and Malware issues may interfere with correct operation. Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone On Apr 16, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Robert Rennard via Elecraft > wrote: I believe that putting WIN10 hardware in the radio will be a benefit to the OEM. It will make the radio become obsolete faster and allow more sales for upgrades. Maestro, SunSDR, and Anan MK II radios all have Win10 PCs embedded. Those radios? embedded PCs are all obsolete already. Consider how much pain it is to deal with Windows 10 updates. I am sure the radio OEMs are paranoid, or at least I would be were I one of them. When you have a widely deployed product that suddenly stops working because of an update, the pain is intense and expensive to cure. How about an Intel NUC instead of a PC ? They were used on Heard and Ducie rather than using laptops. Even NUCs do not support IPA 4K monitors, yet. Bob R From jrichards at k8jhr.com Tue Apr 16 15:22:39 2019 From: jrichards at k8jhr.com (Richards) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:22:39 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft's philosophy of community input on, product design Message-ID: <2991c291-173e-354d-15b3-70c2b52a3984@k8jhr.com> Yes, you HAVE succeeded using a difficult and unique business model that accommodates and fulfills the experimental and developmental aspects of ham radio.? Think about it ... to buy an Elecraft radio, especially in the very early days, is to buy an essentially unfinished work-in-progress undergoing constant development,? against the promise that bugs, foibles and peccadilloes will be cured with future firmware, and occasionally hardware, updates.?? This realizes a major legal purpose of ham radio:? the advancement of radio science.?? Elecraft owners are more than mere consumers;? they are an integral part of the process.?? While this is not my style,? it appeals to a large number of operators willing to experiment and participate in product development, serving as so many ersatz field test sites. Had performance lagged, or had Elecraft failed to deliver promised features and improved performance, the company would have been relegated to ham radio history long ago. Personal accountability and accessibility while looking? the customer directly in the eye is a significant factor in its success. Selling both a process and a product is a bold, risky course.? Fortunately, Elecraft has delivered the goods well enough, and often enough, to earn its place in the race. That is just MY take, of course ... your mileage may vary. K8JHR From kengkopp at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 15:40:39 2019 From: kengkopp at gmail.com (Ken G Kopp) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 13:40:39 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 and WIN10 In-Reply-To: References: <20190416162629.D6040149B16E@mailman.qth.net> <0DEA1905-8283-4178-AE41-0A092B23968B@blomand.net> Message-ID: Whew! Good news! As I set here waiting for a computer tech to arrive and fix my Windows 10 shack computer.... 73 K0PP On Tue, Apr 16, 2019, 13:28 Wayne Burdick wrote: > We will never, ever put any incarnation of Windows in a radio. > > Wayne > N6KR > > ---- > elecraft.com > > > On Apr 16, 2019, at 10:15 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX > wrote: > > > > PLEASE! No operating system embedded in the radio. Almost like ice > cream, there is more than one flavor. > > > > As to Windows 10 updates, configure for automatic, let it do its thing, > and don't mess with the parameters. It is so easy and reliable. Don't > make it complicated by trying to run it yourself. > > > > You also need to maintain a "clean" computer with regular Cache and > Registry cleaning. Leftover and fragments may over ride new updates. Also > Virus and Malware issues may interfere with correct operation. > > > > Bob, K4TAX > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On Apr 16, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Robert Rennard via Elecraft < > elecraft at mailman.qth.net> wrote: > >> > >> I believe that putting WIN10 hardware in the radio will be a benefit to > the OEM. It will make the radio become obsolete faster and allow more > sales for upgrades. > >> > >> Maestro, SunSDR, and Anan MK II radios all have Win10 PCs embedded. > Those radios? embedded PCs are all obsolete already. > >> Consider how much pain it is to deal with Windows 10 updates. I am > sure the radio OEMs are paranoid, or at least I would be were I one of > them. When you have a widely deployed product that suddenly stops working > because of an update, the pain is intense and expensive to cure. > >> > >> How about an Intel NUC instead of a PC ? They were used on Heard and > Ducie rather than using laptops. Even NUCs do not support IPA 4K > monitors, yet. > >> > >> Bob R > >> > >> ______________________________________________________________ > >> Elecraft mailing list > >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > >> > >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rick at tavan.com Tue Apr 16 15:42:19 2019 From: rick at tavan.com (Rick Tavan) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 12:42:19 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft P3 - Fixed Tune Mode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: My guess would be that you don't have it connected to the K3 serial port correctly. If it isn't getting frequency information, it has to stay in scrolling mode. 73, /Rick N6XI -- Rick Tavan Truckee, CA On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 6:37 PM Ed gilliland wrote: > I am unable to put the P3 in "Fixed Tune Mode", the display remains > constant and the VFO A cursor moves across the display. > > I'm sure that I have something configured incorrectly but haven't been > able to discover the error. I have a RS232 cable from the P3 PC port > and a RS232 port on the PC and a cable from the P3 XCVR port to the RJ45 > connector on the K3s. > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Ed W5TM > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rmcgraw at blomand.net Tue Apr 16 16:00:42 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:00:42 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 and WIN10 In-Reply-To: References: <20190416162629.D6040149B16E@mailman.qth.net> <0DEA1905-8283-4178-AE41-0A092B23968B@blomand.net> Message-ID: <7b97e632-9a0a-2205-cbfb-3dbf0acc0dd7@blomand.net> Nor any other operating system of any type, past, present or future. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/16/2019 1:40 PM, Wayne Burdick wrote: > We will never, ever put any incarnation of Windows in a radio. > > Wayne > N6KR > > ---- > elecraft.com > > On Apr 16, 2019, at 10:15 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX > wrote: > >> PLEASE! ?No operating system embedded in the radio. ?Almost like ice >> cream, there is more than one flavor. >> >> As to Windows 10 updates, configure for automatic, let it do its >> thing, and don't mess with the parameters. ?It is so easy and >> reliable. ?Don't make it complicated by trying to run it yourself. >> >> You also need to maintain a "clean" computer with regular Cache and >> Registry cleaning. ?Leftover and fragments may over ride new updates. >> ?Also Virus and Malware issues may interfere with correct operation. >> >> Bob, K4TAX >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Apr 16, 2019, at 11:26 AM, Robert Rennard via Elecraft >>> > wrote: >>> >>> I believe that putting WIN10 hardware in the radio will be a benefit >>> to the OEM. ?It will make the radio become obsolete faster and allow >>> more sales for upgrades. >>> >>> Maestro, SunSDR, and Anan MK II radios all have Win10 PCs embedded. >>> ?Those radios? embedded PCs are all obsolete already. >>> Consider how much pain it is to deal with Windows 10 updates. ?I am >>> sure the radio OEMs are paranoid, or at least I would be were I one >>> of them. ?When you have a widely deployed product that suddenly >>> stops working because of an update, the pain is intense and >>> expensive to cure. >>> >>> How about an Intel NUC instead of a PC ? ??They were used on Heard >>> and Ducie rather than using laptops. ??Even NUCs do not support IPA >>> 4K monitors, yet. >>> >>> Bob R >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rmcgraw at blomand.net Tue Apr 16 16:17:37 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:17:37 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 and WIN10 In-Reply-To: <1555433742089-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1555433742089-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: I commented earlier regarding Windows 10.?? If you have ever had a program crash or the computer lock up, then you most likely will have command line fragments on your computer.? Some of these may not cause issues but some may.??? To be safe, use a software application to clean and clear the Cache and clean the Registry. There are several good ones that are FREE.?? {The best kind for hams} Our IT staff would often write a fault found as a "PICNIC". Problem In Chair Not In Computer. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/16/2019 11:55 AM, K8TE wrote: > It's already possible to use a K3 without a computer. I've done that in the > middle of a contest when I had to re-boot my computer. I logged on paper > until I had access to the log when I added those contacts. > > Regarding computer-related problems, having provided on-line and telephone > tech support for Gateway, the majority of troubles with which I helped were > user-induced. I liken the issue to when I had responsibility for a small > phone system--lack of knowledge on using that "tool." I assert we need to > have sufficient knowledge to operate and maintain our computers, just like > our radios. Sometimes we need to seek help from others, often found on this > list. > > I also assert too many ops aren't conversant with their equipment and much > less with their equipment manuals. Of course, we all do dumb things and I > am near the top of that list. Still, I update my PDF manuals and make use > of them. For Windows, Google is your friend. It is more useful than trying > to find help on Microsoft's web site, in my experience. > > I use electronic loggers for many reasons. Except for the fine products at > QRPWorks, I use a computer and the appropriate logger. I am a keyboard wiz > and can type much faster than I can print. BTW, I have often used the K3 > Utility with a USB hub. But, not all USB hubs are created equal and I > always bypass a hub when troubleshooting connectivity issues. > > I would rather have the K4 firmware space used for features rather than > replacing functions best done on a computer or other external device. It is > 2019 and computers belong in our shacks, IMHO. On SOTA peaks, that may be a > different story. Still, I prefer a non-radio solution for logging, like a > notebook computer, than having a logger in my radio. Save that battery for > operating! Just my humble (or not) opinion. > > BTW, I enjoyed several conversations with Elecraft personnel at the IDXC > this weekend and with Bill, AE6JV. I also noticed WA6HHQ on APRS. It was > an excellent convention once again and I hope the plans to move it to the > Wyndham next year revert back to the Visalia Convention Center with its > larger facilities. > > 73, Bill, K8TE > > So, speaking of the K4 . . . > > When Eric asked a few weeks ago what we might like to have if there were to > be a next generation transceiver, near the top of my list was adding > whatever it would take to make it unnecessary to connect the transceiver to > an outboard computer -- so far as reasonably possible -- ever, for anything. > Eric eventually closed that thread and I don't mean to reopen the wider > question. But would something along those lines ease the kinds of problems > we've been reading about here lately? > > Ted, KN1CBR > > From k6xk at ncn.net Tue Apr 16 16:38:27 2019 From: k6xk at ncn.net (Roy Koeppe) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:38:27 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 F/W ver 2.17 now available Message-ID: <451CAB5FBE47439494BDB38C56906613@ROYKOEPPEHP> K4WJ alerted me that you can access ver 2.17 on your Utility. Went right in! 73, Roy K6XK From n1al at sonic.net Tue Apr 16 17:08:27 2019 From: n1al at sonic.net (Alan) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 14:08:27 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft P3 - Fixed Tune Mode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <25bc7f8b-507a-3e49-b1b7-a109ba9f8e2a@sonic.net> On 4/15/19 6:37 PM, Ed gilliland wrote: > I am unable to put the P3 in "Fixed Tune Mode", the display remains > constant and the VFO A cursor moves across the display. > I think that's the way it's supposed to work in fixed-tune mode. The display stays at the same frequency and the VFO moves across the display as it is tuned. By contrast, in tracking mode the VFO always stays at the center of the screen and the frequency of the display changes to track the VFO as it is tuned. Alan N1AL From softblue at windstream.net Tue Apr 16 18:12:48 2019 From: softblue at windstream.net (Dick Dickinson) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:12:48 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] OT: WIN10 Message-ID: <000601d4f4a1$879a37d0$96cea770$@windstream.net> There was a time when I would have agreed with you. In this day and age, Win 10 is complicated beyond this user's capability to follow a set of mutually exclusive text menus and settings with more on/off switches than a bunch of Altair 8800's stacked to the ceiling and cascaded additionally. Who outside of specialists can understand the implications of so many settings? There was also a time when Googling a resolution of a Windows matter was fairly easily had. Anymore one can spend hours reading what doesn't apply to find what does apply. The overhead of maintaining my system has grown quite a bit. PC ---> Personal Computer..? No longer. It may be 'personal' in that one owns the hardware...arguably the software. The resources required to keep up with it get a bit beyond 'personal.' 73, Dick - KA5KKT PS What wonders await us in May..? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------ "Regarding computer-related problems, having provided on-line and telephone tech support for Gateway, the majority of troubles with which I helped were user-induced. I liken the issue to when I had responsibility for a small phone system--lack of knowledge on using that "tool." I assert we need to have sufficient knowledge to operate and maintain our computers, just like our radios. Sometimes we need to seek help from others, often found on this list. - K8TE" From kzerocx at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 18:46:50 2019 From: kzerocx at gmail.com (Gary Peterson) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:46:50 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft's philosophy of community input on Message-ID: Bravo! Standing and applauding. Gary, K?CX A relatively new K3s/P3 owner and very satisfied customer. ?It has often been stated, by both Elecraft and our customers, that we leverage user input as we flesh out new products. In this article I'll clarify our development model, hopefully elevating it above hearsay. It's intentional and methodical. We like to think it's one of the things that makes Elecraft unique among well-known amateur radio brands.? From eric at elecraft.com Tue Apr 16 19:17:00 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:17:00 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA 1500 CE Approval In-Reply-To: References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <0cdcac93-d03b-bec5-ffcf-98828cbe61f0@elecraft.com> Hi Doug, Yes, we completed CE official lab testing a while back and the shipping amps now have the CE label on them. 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 4/15/2019 7:08 AM, Doug Turnbull wrote: > Dear OMs and YLs, > I looked up the KPA 1500 the other day on my phone and though I saw it > was CE approved. Since then, I can not find this CE statement. Does the > KPA 1500 finally have CE approval so that it can now be purchased into the > EU? I have been waiting for this news for some time as I plan to buy. > > 73 Doug EI2CN > > PS For those outside the EU, CE approval is somewhat akin to UL approval. > A product can not be sold in the EU without this safety approval. > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From dave at nk7z.net Tue Apr 16 19:20:31 2019 From: dave at nk7z.net (Dave Cole (NK7Z)) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:20:31 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft's philosophy of community input on product design In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2906753f-1112-8364-3fa6-8c1b5220587f@nk7z.net> Hi Wayne, OK, I'll be the one to ask... Is this Elecraft's way of saying a K4 is forthcoming? ;) 73s and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Technical Specialist ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL OOC for Oregon On 4/16/19 8:56 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote: > It has often been stated, by both Elecraft and our customers, that we leverage user input as we flesh out new products. In this article I'll clarify our development model, hopefully elevating it above hearsay. It's intentional and methodical. We like to think it's one of the things that makes Elecraft unique among well-known amateur radio brands... From acorbeth at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 19:44:50 2019 From: acorbeth at gmail.com (Alan Corbeth) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 16:44:50 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft's philosophy of community input on product design In-Reply-To: <2906753f-1112-8364-3fa6-8c1b5220587f@nk7z.net> References: <2906753f-1112-8364-3fa6-8c1b5220587f@nk7z.net> Message-ID: <178666DD-2C27-416C-9B8F-CDEE17390D77@gmail.com> That?s a great question Dave, and as you know, I will be among the first to order it! Alan K7FH > On Apr 16, 2019, at 4:20 PM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote: > > Hi Wayne, > > OK, I'll be the one to ask... Is this Elecraft's way of saying a K4 is forthcoming? ;) > > 73s and thanks, > Dave (NK7Z) > https://www.nk7z.net > ARRL Technical Specialist > ARRL Volunteer Examiner > ARRL OOC for Oregon > > On 4/16/19 8:56 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote: >> It has often been stated, by both Elecraft and our customers, that we leverage user input as we flesh out new products. In this article I'll clarify our development model, hopefully elevating it above hearsay. It's intentional and methodical. We like to think it's one of the things that makes Elecraft unique among well-known amateur radio brands... > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From donwilh at embarqmail.com Tue Apr 16 20:39:23 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:39:23 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft's philosophy of community input on product design In-Reply-To: <2906753f-1112-8364-3fa6-8c1b5220587f@nk7z.net> References: <2906753f-1112-8364-3fa6-8c1b5220587f@nk7z.net> Message-ID: <291a02e4-6b50-3447-5f10-6b5a430e76da@embarqmail.com> Dave, The answer (as always) is Yes, Elecraft is always working on something new. The real question is "when", and that will be unknown until it is announced. Whether it will be called "K4" or something else remains to be seen at announcement time. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/16/2019 7:20 PM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote: > Hi Wayne, > > OK, I'll be the one to ask...? Is this Elecraft's way of saying a K4 is > forthcoming?? ;) > From lists at w2irt.net Tue Apr 16 20:58:08 2019 From: lists at w2irt.net (Peter Dougherty) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:58:08 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] FT8 distorted audio, won't decode Message-ID: <00f201d4f4b8$9ffe7400$dffb5c00$@w2irt.net> Hi all, Whenever I bring up WSJT-X and the radio goes into DATA mode (Data A), the audio through the speaker is extremely distorted and there is no decode at all. Soundcard RX Levels are about 30 dB. If I switch the radio into USB I can decode just fine, but not using the DATA mode. I haven't changed anything in the radio or software since the last time I used FT8, about a month ago. I've hardly even had the radio powered up for more than a couple of hours in the last month. Any idea what could have gone wrong, or where I can go to fix it? I'm sincerely hoping this is a software problem and that I didn't somehow harm the receiver. I'm not using the Noise Blanker or Noise Reduction, AGC is set to either Fast or Slow, I'm on the main antenna, signals are very strong, and I've tried with and without the attenuator. Nothing shows up on WSJT's traces in Data mode. --------------------------------------------- 73 and Good DX Peter, W2IRT President, North Jersey DX Association DXCC Card Checker Letter O Manager, ARRL Incoming 2nd District QSL bureau From ve3nr at bell.net Tue Apr 16 21:03:59 2019 From: ve3nr at bell.net (Bert) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:03:59 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K1 manual revisions In-Reply-To: <286029a9-52f5-93f4-f4f4-a61c36a20a34@embarqmail.com> References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <1555420624328-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <286029a9-52f5-93f4-f4f4-a61c36a20a34@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <0c73227e-199d-0435-e5ed-c0ebbfc76fba@bell.net> Hi Don, Petr and all, I have a similar TX problem that I've been working on for a time. Reading your emails I realized that I'm using a K1 manual Rev. J. 2015. My K1 is from around 2000, Rev. D, and I'm now asking if the Rev. J of the manual is OK to use as reference and for troubleshooting? I have been searching for K1 Rev. D manual but can't find it. Thanks! Bert VE3NR On 4/16/2019 10:55 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > Petr. > > Turn that manual to Appendix E near the back.? And on page 6 of that > Appendix, you will find Transmitter Signal Tracing. > Set up the K1 as instructed there, and no damage will be done. > > Then make the measurements in the order listed.? You will need an RF > probe.? If you are using an oscilloscope (with a 10X probe), multiply > the expected values by 2.8 to obtain the expected peak to peak RF > voltage measurements. > > At the FIRST measurement that is significantly less than the expected > value (expect as much as a 10% variation before saying it is > significant) you have reached the output of the failing stage. > Correct that stage and move onward to the next failure point. > > That is the procedure required to determine why it is not working. > > If the final is blown, replace it with the K1PAKIT from Elecraft. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > > On 4/16/2019 9:17 AM, Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS wrote: >> Don, >> >> I checked other parts in TX section and it seems to be ok (refer to >> manual >> 2000 Rev. D). Just removed the 5th turn on secondary winding of T3. >> >> Is there something else strange or danger which I should check in >> order to >> avoid smoke during the test or even blowing the final please? >> >> Many thanks mate, >> >> Petr >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> 73 - Petr, OK1RP >> "Apple & Elecraft freak" >> B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com >> MeWe: https://bit.ly/2HGPoDx >> MeWe: https://bit.ly/2FmwvDt >> -- >> Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From MJGillen at yahoo.com Tue Apr 16 21:05:09 2019 From: MJGillen at yahoo.com (Michael Gillen) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:05:09 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch Message-ID: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? Recommendations? Thanks, Michael KK6RWK From dave at nk7z.net Tue Apr 16 21:13:21 2019 From: dave at nk7z.net (Dave Cole (NK7Z)) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:13:21 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft's philosophy of community input on product design In-Reply-To: <291a02e4-6b50-3447-5f10-6b5a430e76da@embarqmail.com> References: <2906753f-1112-8364-3fa6-8c1b5220587f@nk7z.net> <291a02e4-6b50-3447-5f10-6b5a430e76da@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <1110f874-c081-38e4-3fc9-3c9adcec36bb@nk7z.net> Hence why I used the word "forthcoming", to indicate relatively soon... 73s and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Technical Specialist ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL OOC for Oregon On 4/16/19 5:39 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > Dave, > > The answer (as always) is Yes, Elecraft is always working on something new. > > The real question is "when", and that will be unknown until it is > announced. > > Whether it will be called "K4" or something else remains to be seen at > announcement time. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/16/2019 7:20 PM, Dave Cole (NK7Z) wrote: >> Hi Wayne, >> >> OK, I'll be the one to ask...? Is this Elecraft's way of saying a K4 >> is forthcoming?? ;) >> From k6mr at outlook.com Tue Apr 16 21:24:46 2019 From: k6mr at outlook.com (Ken K6MR) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 01:24:46 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> Message-ID: What we call a ?foot switch? is a ?sustain pedal? in guitar speak (the real market). The standard is a 1/4? plug. Buy an adapter. Ken K6MR ________________________________ From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of Michael Gillen via Elecraft Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 6:05:09 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? Recommendations? Thanks, Michael KK6RWK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From va3mw at portcredit.net Tue Apr 16 21:28:17 2019 From: va3mw at portcredit.net (Michael Walker) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:28:17 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Ken Foot switches or hand switches are pretty simple devices. All they do is 'ground' the center conductor of the PTT line. When you ground it, the radio goes into TX. If the Heil unit you purchased has the wrong connector on it, you can just purchase an adapter from a company like Mono Price ( https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=7242 $0.79) or cut off the connector it came with and solder on the RCA connector you need. Mike va3mw On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 9:25 PM Ken K6MR wrote: > What we call a ?foot switch? is a ?sustain pedal? in guitar speak (the > real market). The standard is a 1/4? plug. Buy an adapter. > > > > Ken K6MR > > > > ________________________________ > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net > on behalf of Michael Gillen via Elecraft > Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 6:05:09 PM > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch > > Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. > > I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my > KPA500/KAT500 setup. > > I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s > has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio > before I bought it). > > So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get > something else? > > Recommendations? > > Thanks, > Michael > KK6RWK > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From josh at voodoolab.com Tue Apr 16 21:30:09 2019 From: josh at voodoolab.com (Josh Fiden) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:30:09 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> Message-ID: <65dd049c-dbc5-ff56-d1a9-362a77abe4aa@voodoolab.com> https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/CPR105--hosa-cpr105-5-foot https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/CPR110--hosa-cpr110-10-foot Sweetwater is a good vendor with free shipping. Hosa is a reputable brand. 73, Josh W6XU On 4/16/2019 6:05 PM, Michael Gillen via Elecraft wrote: > Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. > > I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. > > I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). > > So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? > > Recommendations? > > Thanks, > Michael > KK6RWK > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From josh at voodoolab.com Tue Apr 16 21:34:42 2019 From: josh at voodoolab.com (Josh Fiden) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:34:42 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> Message-ID: Yes, exactly. My Boss FS-5U has performed flawlessly for 15+ years including a few Field Day trips to the mud. Very durable. The sides are keyed so you can lock multiple together. https://www.sweetwater.com/store/detail/FS5U--boss-fs-5u-non-latching-footswitch 73, Josh W6XU On 4/16/2019 6:24 PM, Ken K6MR wrote: > What we call a ?foot switch? is a ?sustain pedal? in guitar speak (the real market). The standard is a 1/4? plug. Buy an adapter. > > > > Ken K6MR From MJGillen at yahoo.com Tue Apr 16 21:44:14 2019 From: MJGillen at yahoo.com (Michael Gillen) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 18:44:14 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> Message-ID: <3DAF2B68-A099-4AA5-A32C-CD348D1C7234@yahoo.com> Thanks to all that chimed in I have enough options now. I am already using the Radiosport headphones and very happy with them so I?m going to order one of their foot switches. 73s all, Michael KK6RWK > On Apr 16, 2019, at 6:05 PM, Michael Gillen via Elecraft wrote: > > Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. > > I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. > > I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). > > So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? > > Recommendations? > > Thanks, > Michael > KK6RWK > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From netbsd21 at gmail.com Tue Apr 16 21:51:38 2019 From: netbsd21 at gmail.com (Scott) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 20:51:38 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> Message-ID: Michael, This adapter should work. 1/4" mono female to rca male adapter https://www.amazon.com/CGTime-6-35mm-Adapter-Female-Converterr/dp/B07HD3Z5R1?SubscriptionId=AKIAILSHYYTFIVPWUY6Q&tag=duckduckgo-d-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=B07HD3Z5R1 Sure it's a pack of 5 but if you look around I'm betting you can find it in solo or twin packs. Or if you really want a Heil foot switch then the FS-2 looks like it would work. Or as some one else mentioned, bust out the soldering iron. 73, Scott AD5HS On 4/16/2019 8:05 PM, Michael Gillen via Elecraft wrote: > Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. > > I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. > > I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). > > So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? > > Recommendations? > > Thanks, > Michael > KK6RWK > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From bconder at yahoo.com Tue Apr 16 21:57:12 2019 From: bconder at yahoo.com (Bob Conder) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 01:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] ERR KEY Message References: <602056092.1777901.1555466232799.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <602056092.1777901.1555466232799@mail.yahoo.com> Been trying to configure SDR Uno with RSP2 as a spectrum scope. (Using IF output to RSP) But not much luck.Right now, when I turn on SDR Uno, with the K3 already in CW mode, the SDR keys the rig for a moment, then stops.The "ERR KEY" message shows up on the screen.Can't get the message to clear, and can't send CW, so have to pwr down the rig, to get the error message to clearand to be able to operate the K3 agn.Anyone else with SDR Uno/RSP2 have this problem?Any suggestions appreciated.TIA,Bob K4RLC From lists at w2irt.net Tue Apr 16 22:01:53 2019 From: lists at w2irt.net (Peter Dougherty) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:01:53 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> Message-ID: <010c01d4f4c1$87982e70$96c88b50$@w2irt.net> In 2015 I bought one of these: https://www.amazon.com/Linemaster-Clipper-Switch-Electrical-Momentary/dp/B00 2P55Y36/ref=sr_1_18 This is an Industrial grade, very high quality footswitch. You can wire it NC or NO. Takes 5 minutes to set up. You'll never need another switch after this. There were versions of these pedals installed in film projection booths I worked in throughout my career, to do changeovers between machines; they were installed in the 40s and 50s and were still going strong when I left the industry. They are indestructible and worth every penny of their $30 price. - pjd -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Ken K6MR Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 9:25 PM To: Michael Gillen ; elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch What we call a "foot switch" is a "sustain pedal" in guitar speak (the real market). The standard is a 1/4" plug. Buy an adapter. Ken K6MR ________________________________ From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of Michael Gillen via Elecraft Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 6:05:09 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I'd ask. I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4" phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? Recommendations? Thanks, Michael KK6RWK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From donwilh at embarqmail.com Wed Apr 17 00:13:51 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 00:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> Message-ID: Gee folks, we can build our own transmitters and amplifiers and experiment with them on the air. Why is it so hard to get an RCA plug, cut off the 1/4 inch phone plug and solder on an RCA plug? Much easier than searching for an adapter. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/16/2019 9:05 PM, Michael Gillen via Elecraft wrote: > Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. > > I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. > > I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). > > So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? > > Recommendations? > > Thanks, > Michael > KK6RWK > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From donwilh at embarqmail.com Wed Apr 17 00:17:33 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 00:17:33 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K1 manual revisions In-Reply-To: <0c73227e-199d-0435-e5ed-c0ebbfc76fba@bell.net> References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <1555420624328-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <286029a9-52f5-93f4-f4f4-a61c36a20a34@embarqmail.com> <0c73227e-199d-0435-e5ed-c0ebbfc76fba@bell.net> Message-ID: Bert, The troubleshooting section is about the same - no problem. Do not rely on the board Rev level to be the same as the manual level. There is no Rev J K1 board. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/16/2019 9:03 PM, Bert wrote: > Hi Don, Petr and all, > > I have a similar TX problem that I've been working on for a time. > Reading your emails I realized > that I'm using a K1 manual Rev. J. 2015. > > My K1 is from around 2000, Rev. D, and I'm now asking if the Rev. J of > the manual is OK to use > as reference and for troubleshooting? > From k9yeq at live.com Wed Apr 17 00:20:23 2019 From: k9yeq at live.com (Bill Johnson) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 04:20:23 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> Message-ID: Don, No Kidding... Exactly. I have the dual radio/amp switch and I managed. :-) However, buying and adapter is often a great option when money is good and time isn't. 73, Bill K9YEQ https://wrj-tech.com/ -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Don Wilhelm Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 11:14 PM To: Michael Gillen ; elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch Gee folks, we can build our own transmitters and amplifiers and experiment with them on the air. Why is it so hard to get an RCA plug, cut off the 1/4 inch phone plug and solder on an RCA plug? Much easier than searching for an adapter. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/16/2019 9:05 PM, Michael Gillen via Elecraft wrote: > Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. > > I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. > > I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). > > So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? > > Recommendations? > > Thanks, > Michael > KK6RWK > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jackbrindle at me.com Wed Apr 17 00:36:14 2019 From: jackbrindle at me.com (Jack Brindle) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 21:36:14 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> Message-ID: <6A7373D7-C414-4A80-BFF1-B745E29237B1@me.com> You know, I would be tempted to get a 1/4? female cord-mount jack and a cable with an RCA plug on it, shorten the end of the cable without the RCA plug (just to make a short adapter), slip on the connector housing, then solder the remaining cable to the 1/4? jack. That gives an adapter with some strain relief, thus reducing the lever-arm strain of a single-body adapter on the radio?s RCA jack, and would allow me not to have to modify the foot switch cable. Michael, if you need help with that, let me know and we will see what we can do. 73! Jack, W6FB > On Apr 16, 2019, at 9:13 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > > Gee folks, we can build our own transmitters and amplifiers and experiment with them on the air. > > Why is it so hard to get an RCA plug, cut off the 1/4 inch phone plug and solder on an RCA plug? > Much easier than searching for an adapter. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/16/2019 9:05 PM, Michael Gillen via Elecraft wrote: >> Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. >> I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. >> I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). >> So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? >> Recommendations? >> Thanks, >> Michael >> KK6RWK >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From k2vco.vic at gmail.com Wed Apr 17 01:12:41 2019 From: k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Vic Rosenthal) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:12:41 +0300 Subject: [Elecraft] Modularity Message-ID: <2389FBB1-3426-48E5-8B7F-BF36BF7E7A4F@gmail.com> All this talk about onboard computers (or not) and operating systems in the K4 has me thinking. My K3 is serial no. 0007. I have had it since the beginning, and with a few simple upgrades, it is almost as capable as a new K3S. But the computers I had back then are long gone. What I would like to have in the K4 is a backplane architecture. The entire radio except for a control head would be located on plugin boards that could be swapped out easily for testing, customizing, or upgrading. The ENTIRE radio. The K3 goes in this direction, but not far enough. One of the options would be an onboard computer. You could use the rig without it or with an external computer if you wish. Maybe it would come with some version of Linux, but you could put another version of Linux or Windows on it if you wanted. You could upgrade it easily when it became obsolete. Yes, this would cost more. But with the savings available from modern automated surface mount construction, maybe it?s possible. Victor 4X6GP From wunder at wunderwood.org Wed Apr 17 01:18:35 2019 From: wunder at wunderwood.org (Walter Underwood) Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 22:18:35 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> Message-ID: <4A3C3433-AD4F-4C96-B352-F4D30E152773@wunderwood.org> The last time this was discussed, there were many satisfied users of the Linemaster Treadlite II foot switch. Here is one with an un-connectored cord. As you check out the reviews on the variations of the Treadlite II, you?ll find the ?yeah, had one on a drill press for twenty years? reviews. https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B002P53WQM/ wunder K6WRU Walter Underwood CM87wj http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Apr 16, 2019, at 9:13 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > > Gee folks, we can build our own transmitters and amplifiers and experiment with them on the air. > > Why is it so hard to get an RCA plug, cut off the 1/4 inch phone plug and solder on an RCA plug? > Much easier than searching for an adapter. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/16/2019 9:05 PM, Michael Gillen via Elecraft wrote: >> Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. >> I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. >> I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). >> So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? >> Recommendations? >> Thanks, >> Michael >> KK6RWK >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From ebasilier at cox.net Wed Apr 17 03:40:37 2019 From: ebasilier at cox.net (Erik Basilier) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 00:40:37 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia? In-Reply-To: References: <1D75D7CA-26F7-4AF0-B165-87E813E9835E@mac.com> Message-ID: <000b01d4f4f0$da82ca80$8f885f80$@cox.net> Tonight I attended a presentation by Ned Stearns AA7A on the Dxpedition version of FT8, and his extensive architectural design contributions to the Baker Island operation as well as his input to Joe Taylor's work on the protocol. While most of us don't need anything like the Baker station setup, the technical issues may nevertheless influence the direction and needs of the overall amateur gear market. With Elecraft's emphasis on supporting Dxpeditions I am sure that they look at such issues when considering new features for the K4 etc. Just a few points from the presentation that stuck in my mind: * The radio transmit frequency must be controlled by both the logger and the JT software, which work together but are separate. I have no personal experience with FT8, but I understand that (either with the current version or very soon) the DX hunter's transmit frequency will be dictated automatically on the fly by the DX starion, within a segment of the overall FT8 frequency window, such that the DX can overlap several FT8 qso's in time. This necessitates working around the basic "single sender" RS-232 signalling scheme. Ways to do this were recently discussed here, and need not be repeated. My point: Elecraft might consider an attempt to standardize a new communication scheme for station control, such as to simplify the whole setup. Wiring a station is already disturbimgly complicated where multiple radios are involved. * The DX station would thus go beyond "SO2R" to something more like "SO4R". The FLEX approach already seems to have an edge in savings on mulit-radio hardware; a market-leading Elecraft architecture might optimize overall hardware cost when one operator is to use 2,3 or 4 virtual radios. Just hope it can be done so modularly that a small configuration is still affordable. * With the current interest in FT8, there seems to be pressure for the hardware to have capability to process a frequency segment that is larger than an SSB bandwidth. 73, Erik K7TV -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Bill Frantz Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 5:28 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Visalia? I didn't spend any time at the Flex booth, although their signas touted SmartSDR Version 3, so I expect they were also talking about multiFlex. While there may not be a lot of use for multiFlex in the normal DX chaser, perhaps except for those stations that really don't want US responses so transmit in the US phone band but listen in the US CW band, there are some interesting uses for DXpeditions. AA7JV was interested in running both CW and FT8 on 160M with one amplifier and transmit antenna. (He said setting up two stations was too much work, and you needed to be running both modes on those "magic nights" when 160 was open.) He described an approach using a Flex in his talk at the Topband dinner and in his ""The RIB: Radio In a Box for DXpeditions" session. The idea of RIB is to put the box in the rare DX with a generator and antenna, and operate it from the boat off shore via UHF based internet, just visiting the DX to set up, service the generator, and tear down. 73 Bill AE6JV From bjorn at ekelund.nu Wed Apr 17 04:11:16 2019 From: bjorn at ekelund.nu (=?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn_Ekelund?=) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:11:16 +0200 Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia? In-Reply-To: <000b01d4f4f0$da82ca80$8f885f80$@cox.net> References: <1D75D7CA-26F7-4AF0-B165-87E813E9835E@mac.com> <000b01d4f4f0$da82ca80$8f885f80$@cox.net> Message-ID: I also enjoyed Ned's presentation. There is however no need for new transceiver architectures to support FT8 DX mode. The multi-transmission for FT8 Fox is created entirely through software by combining the baseband (audio) signal for each "transmitter" into a composite signal fed to the transceiver. Multi-reception is also purely a software affair. Any modern radio, including the K3, supports this out of the box. There is thus no need for multiple CAT interfaces. Unless you want to run several bands simultaneously in one radio, of course. But that is no different from CW or any other mode. 73, Bj?rn SM7IUN Den ons 17 apr. 2019 kl 09:41 skrev Erik Basilier : > Tonight I attended a presentation by Ned Stearns AA7A on the Dxpedition > version of FT8, and his extensive architectural design contributions to the > Baker Island operation as well as his input to Joe Taylor's work on the > protocol. While most of us don't need anything like the Baker station > setup, the technical issues may nevertheless influence the direction and > needs of the overall amateur gear market. With Elecraft's emphasis on > supporting Dxpeditions I am sure that they look at such issues when > considering new features for the K4 etc. Just a few points from the > presentation that stuck in my mind: > * The radio transmit frequency must be controlled by both the logger and > the JT software, which work together but are separate. I have no personal > experience with FT8, but I understand that (either with the current version > or very soon) the DX hunter's transmit frequency will be dictated > automatically on the fly by the DX starion, within a segment of the overall > FT8 frequency window, such that the DX can overlap several FT8 qso's in > time. This necessitates working around the basic "single sender" RS-232 > signalling scheme. Ways to do this were recently discussed here, and need > not be repeated. My point: Elecraft might consider an attempt to > standardize a new communication scheme for station control, such as to > simplify the whole setup. Wiring a station is already disturbimgly > complicated where multiple radios are involved. > * The DX station would thus go beyond "SO2R" to something more like > "SO4R". The FLEX approach already seems to have an edge in savings on > mulit-radio hardware; a market-leading Elecraft architecture might optimize > overall hardware cost when one operator is to use 2,3 or 4 virtual radios. > Just hope it can be done so modularly that a small configuration is still > affordable. > * With the current interest in FT8, there seems to be pressure for the > hardware to have capability to process a frequency segment that is larger > than an SSB bandwidth. > 73, > Erik K7TV > > > -----Original Message----- > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net > On Behalf Of Bill Frantz > Sent: Monday, April 15, 2019 5:28 PM > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Visalia? > > I didn't spend any time at the Flex booth, although their signas touted > SmartSDR Version 3, so I expect they were also talking about multiFlex. > > While there may not be a lot of use for multiFlex in the normal DX chaser, > perhaps except for those stations that really don't want US responses so > transmit in the US phone band but listen in the US CW band, there are some > interesting uses for DXpeditions. > > AA7JV was interested in running both CW and FT8 on 160M with one amplifier > and transmit antenna. (He said setting up two stations was too much work, > and you needed to be running both modes on those "magic nights" when 160 > was open.) > > He described an approach using a Flex in his talk at the Topband dinner > and in his ""The RIB: Radio In a Box for DXpeditions" session. > > The idea of RIB is to put the box in the rare DX with a generator and > antenna, and operate it from the boat off shore via UHF based internet, > just visiting the DX to set up, service the generator, and tear down. > > 73 Bill AE6JV > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From red99cam at sbcglobal.net Wed Apr 17 04:18:44 2019 From: red99cam at sbcglobal.net (Albert Little) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:18:44 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] K2 References: <1088417437.1877585.1555489124847.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1088417437.1877585.1555489124847@mail.yahoo.com> I found a K2 to buy...Not looking anymore...Albert Little W5APL From turnbull at net1.ie Wed Apr 17 04:33:31 2019 From: turnbull at net1.ie (turnbull) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:33:31 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA 1500 CE Approval In-Reply-To: <0cdcac93-d03b-bec5-ffcf-98828cbe61f0@elecraft.com> Message-ID: <5cb6e4dd.1c69fb81.38ae1.08ca@mx.google.com> Hi Eric, Madelin has my order? thank you.? ?Just loaned my KX2 to EI6FR for SOTA use.? ?Declan is most impressed.? ?I fell for the KX2 upon seeing it at Friefrichshafen.? ?So small so much performance and a great display for old eyes.73 Doug EI2CNSent from my Samsung Galaxy smartphone. -------- Original message --------From: "Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft" Date: 17/04/2019 00:17 (GMT+00:00) To: Doug Turnbull , elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA 1500 CE Approval Hi Doug, Yes, we completed CE official lab testing a while back and the shipping amps now have the CE label on them. 73, Eric elecraft.com On 4/15/2019 7:08 AM, Doug Turnbull wrote: Dear OMs and YLs, I looked up the KPA 1500 the other day on my phone and though I saw it was CE approved. Since then, I can not find this CE statement. Does the KPA 1500 finally have CE approval so that it can now be purchased into the EU? I have been waiting for this news for some time as I plan to buy. 73 Doug EI2CN PS For those outside the EU, CE approval is somewhat akin to UL approval. A product can not be sold in the EU without this safety approval. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From indians at xsmail.com Wed Apr 17 05:34:51 2019 From: indians at xsmail.com (Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 02:34:51 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] [K1] TX part sick In-Reply-To: <286029a9-52f5-93f4-f4f4-a61c36a20a34@embarqmail.com> References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <1555420624328-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <286029a9-52f5-93f4-f4f4-a61c36a20a34@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <1555493691938-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Don, many thanks. Manual is printed now. I am going to do it step by step accordingly during coming Easter holiday. I will report then after...:) 73 Petr ----- 73 - Petr, OK1RP "Apple & Elecraft freak" B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com MeWe: https://bit.ly/2HGPoDx MeWe: https://bit.ly/2FmwvDt -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From pa3a at xs4all.nl Wed Apr 17 07:25:54 2019 From: pa3a at xs4all.nl (Arie Kleingeld PA3A) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:25:54 +0200 Subject: [Elecraft] ERR KEY Message In-Reply-To: <602056092.1777901.1555466232799@mail.yahoo.com> References: <602056092.1777901.1555466232799.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <602056092.1777901.1555466232799@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1293497c-b820-89e6-927f-3d50634f1ed8@xs4all.nl> Hi Bob, I've been playing with the RSP1A at the IF of my K3 and HDSDR and SDR Uno as panadapter software. I also had Omnirig running for this. Never bumped into the kind of problem you describe. I can reproduce your problem though, by setting up omnirig with wrong RTS/DTR setting. One thing to observe is that you connect OmniRig to the K3 with RTS and DTR low. This will probably cure your problem. HDSDR / SDR Uno and the RSP1A? not really gave me the results I want. My best and cheap panadapter is still the IF-Softrock plus my pc-onboard soundcard. Software: NAP3 and LP-BRIDGE. Wonderful pieces of software (THANK YOU GUYS). They do the trick for a beautiful panadapter (in collapsed mode) and flawless integration with the K3 and other software. The noise floor might not be as low as in the P3 of LP-pan, but it works for me as a panadapter. 73 Arie PA3A Op 17-4-2019 om 03:57 schreef Bob Conder via Elecraft: > Been trying to configure SDR Uno with RSP2 as a spectrum scope. (Using IF output to RSP) But not much luck.Right now, when I turn on SDR Uno, with the K3 already in CW mode, the SDR keys the rig for a moment, then stops.The "ERR KEY" message shows up on the screen.Can't get the message to clear, and can't send CW, so have to pwr down the rig, to get the error message to clearand to be able to operate the K3 agn.Anyone else with SDR Uno/RSP2 have this problem?Any suggestions appreciated.TIA,Bob K4RLC From hillslaird at internode.on.net Wed Apr 17 07:52:13 2019 From: hillslaird at internode.on.net (Kev Schache) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 21:22:13 +0930 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 and FreeDV In-Reply-To: References: <4d2f717f-e06e-4dc8-7a0d-2bd5f7c52134@internode.on.net> Message-ID: <47537301-5f43-9462-081b-1575183303ee@internode.on.net> Thanks for the info Jim but my problem is that I have no idea how to connect what with what. That's why I was looking for someone who may have used the KX3 with FreeDV, maybe no one has yet... Kev?????? VK5KS On 16-Apr-19 5:44 PM, Jim Rhodes wrote: > An inexpensive USB sound card (look for one with line in) say about > $15(US) and a couple of audio cables is all you need. Set your levels > (4 bars with 5th flashing on transmit, best decode on receive) and > away you go. I am not familiar with FreeDV, if it has the ability to > do PTT over com port you can key with that, otherwise you can set up > VOX. KX3 does not do FSK, you have to use AFSK. Not a big deal, just > keep an eye on the transmit level. > > On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 2:58 AM Kev Schache > > wrote: > > Not knowing anything about digital modes, I've become intrigued by > FreeDV and figured that maybe I should? give it a go.? I've read a > bit, > watched some relevant YouTube,? re-read Don's (W3FPR) article on his > website and figured I'll need an external sound card.? I've also > checked > out the FreeDV website and downloaded the software.? Now I'm > looking at > SignaLink and also West Mountain Radio RIGblaster.? The facts are > though, I haven't got much of a clue, so any help will be great. > > Has anyone used either of these products with the KX3 for FreeDV?? > Any > recommendations ? > > Thanks to all in advance > > 73??? Kev???? VK5KS > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > -- > Jim K0XU > jim at rhodesend.net From rmcgraw at blomand.net Wed Apr 17 08:29:45 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:29:45 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> Message-ID: <5ab30eb2-ae51-eea1-fb4a-6dbf68593f96@blomand.net> Yes and the length of the 1/4" phone plug plus the length of the adapter to an RCA connector is something of serious length sticking out behind the radio.? Sure is a grand opportunity to get the radio RCA connector damaged.? Estimated total length of the albatross is about 3".??? Not on my radio! 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/16/2019 11:13 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > Gee folks, we can build our own transmitters and amplifiers and > experiment with them on the air. > > Why is it so hard to get an RCA plug, cut off the 1/4 inch phone plug > and solder on an RCA plug? > Much easier than searching for an adapter. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/16/2019 9:05 PM, Michael Gillen via Elecraft wrote: >> Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. >> >> I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my >> KPA500/KAT500 setup. >> >> I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and >> the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of >> the radio before I bought it). >> >> So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get >> something else? >> >> Recommendations? >> >> Thanks, >> Michael >> KK6RWK >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From mike.harris at horizon.co.fk Wed Apr 17 08:52:23 2019 From: mike.harris at horizon.co.fk (Mike Harris) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:52:23 -0300 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: <5ab30eb2-ae51-eea1-fb4a-6dbf68593f96@blomand.net> References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> <5ab30eb2-ae51-eea1-fb4a-6dbf68593f96@blomand.net> Message-ID: I use a Heil FS-3. I just cut the 1/4 in plug off along with much of the surplus cable and fitted an RCA plug. Couldn't be easier. Regards, Mike VP8NO On 17/04/2019 09:29, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > Yes and the length of the 1/4" phone plug plus the length of the adapter > to an RCA connector is something of serious length sticking out behind > the radio.? Sure is a grand opportunity to get the radio RCA connector > damaged.? Estimated total length of the albatross is about 3".??? Not on > my radio! > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX From c-hawley at illinois.edu Wed Apr 17 09:19:38 2019 From: c-hawley at illinois.edu (hawley, charles j jr) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:19:38 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com>, Message-ID: This will work, use one side of it. I couldn't find a mono version of it. https://www.amazon.com/CGTime-Splitter-Gold-Plated-Extension-Adapter/dp/B07K7C1MSF/ref=sr_1_41?keywords=1%2F4%22+female+to+to+rca+male+adapter&qid=1555506937&s=gateway&sr=8-41 [https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/315nf6aCGvL._SX300_QL70_.jpg1zB] Amazon.com: CGTime 6.35mm to 2 RCA Y Splitter Cable, Gold-Plated 6.35mm (1/4 inch) TRS Female to 2 (Dual) RCA Male Stereo Audio Y Splitter Extension Adapter Cable (12Inch/30CM): Home Audio & Theater >From The Community. Try Prime Electronics www.amazon.com Chuck Hawley c-hawley at illinois.edu Amateur Radio, KE9UW ________________________________ From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of Ken K6MR Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 8:24 PM To: Michael Gillen; elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch What we call a ?foot switch? is a ?sustain pedal? in guitar speak (the real market). The standard is a 1/4? plug. Buy an adapter. Ken K6MR ________________________________ From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of Michael Gillen via Elecraft Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 6:05:09 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? Recommendations? Thanks, Michael KK6RWK ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From c-hawley at illinois.edu Wed Apr 17 09:22:58 2019 From: c-hawley at illinois.edu (hawley, charles j jr) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:22:58 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com>, Message-ID: Those adapters will place a lot of torque on the back of the K3. A better idea is an adapter with connectors on each end of a wire. Chuck Hawley c-hawley at illinois.edu Amateur Radio, KE9UW ________________________________ From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of Scott Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 8:51 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch Michael, This adapter should work. 1/4" mono female to rca male adapter https://www.amazon.com/CGTime-6-35mm-Adapter-Female-Converterr/dp/B07HD3Z5R1?SubscriptionId=AKIAILSHYYTFIVPWUY6Q&tag=duckduckgo-d-20&linkCode=xm2&camp=2025&creative=165953&creativeASIN=B07HD3Z5R1 Sure it's a pack of 5 but if you look around I'm betting you can find it in solo or twin packs. Or if you really want a Heil foot switch then the FS-2 looks like it would work. Or as some one else mentioned, bust out the soldering iron. 73, Scott AD5HS On 4/16/2019 8:05 PM, Michael Gillen via Elecraft wrote: > Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. > > I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. > > I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). > > So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? > > Recommendations? > > Thanks, > Michael > KK6RWK > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From w2blc at nycap.rr.com Wed Apr 17 09:26:12 2019 From: w2blc at nycap.rr.com (Bill) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:26:12 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9a8d3e04-61a4-bab3-1177-b7d5cac353d2@nycap.rr.com> Is there an APP for this??? Or, let's make it as complicated and wordy as possible! I know, let's build a mountain from a mole hill! Cut the offending plug off and solder a proper (for your needs) plug on! It could not be easier! From john at kk9a.com Wed Apr 17 09:33:49 2019 From: john at kk9a.com (john at kk9a.com) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 13:33:49 -0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch Message-ID: <000c01d4f522$3147f6c0$93d7e440$@com> Agreed but I would really make sure that the switch is acceptable before modifying it. I do not use a foot switch but I am aware that there are many different ones available. Also if I recall the Heil foot switch will plug into their adaptor if you are using the front mic jack. John KK9A Don Wilhelm W3FPR wrote: Gee folks, we can build our own transmitters and amplifiers and experiment with them on the air. Why is it so hard to get an RCA plug, cut off the 1/4 inch phone plug and solder on an RCA plug? Much easier than searching for an adapter. 73, Don W3FPR From alan at wilcoxengineering.com Wed Apr 17 10:42:38 2019 From: alan at wilcoxengineering.com (Alan D. Wilcox) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:42:38 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] WTB K2 metal panels Message-ID: <546B162E-ED7C-4BA6-BD38-EC4744C874D2@wilcoxengineering.com> Want to buy used ? ? L&R side panels for K2 ? Front-bottom panel (with tilt stand hopefully) ? Rear-bottom panel Reply off list. Thanks, Alan Alan D. Wilcox, W3DVX (K2-5373, K3-40) 570-916-9590 (cell, text) http://amazon.com/author/alandwilcox Williamsport, PA 17701 From wunder at wunderwood.org Wed Apr 17 11:31:18 2019 From: wunder at wunderwood.org (Walter Underwood) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 08:31:18 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 and FreeDV In-Reply-To: <47537301-5f43-9462-081b-1575183303ee@internode.on.net> References: <4d2f717f-e06e-4dc8-7a0d-2bd5f7c52134@internode.on.net> <47537301-5f43-9462-081b-1575183303ee@internode.on.net> Message-ID: I set up FreeDV once, but it was a while ago. It is exactly the same as setting up any digital mode for radio connections. The difference is that you also need to hook up a headset (or mic and speakers) for the operator. Get the radio side set up first using test tones. wunder K6WRU Walter Underwood CM87wj http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > On Apr 17, 2019, at 4:52 AM, Kev Schache wrote: > > Thanks for the info Jim but my problem is that I have no idea how to connect what with what. > > That's why I was looking for someone who may have used the KX3 with FreeDV, maybe no one has yet... > > Kev VK5KS > > On 16-Apr-19 5:44 PM, Jim Rhodes wrote: >> An inexpensive USB sound card (look for one with line in) say about $15(US) and a couple of audio cables is all you need. Set your levels (4 bars with 5th flashing on transmit, best decode on receive) and away you go. I am not familiar with FreeDV, if it has the ability to do PTT over com port you can key with that, otherwise you can set up VOX. KX3 does not do FSK, you have to use AFSK. Not a big deal, just keep an eye on the transmit level. >> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 2:58 AM Kev Schache > wrote: >> >> Not knowing anything about digital modes, I've become intrigued by >> FreeDV and figured that maybe I should give it a go. I've read a >> bit, >> watched some relevant YouTube, re-read Don's (W3FPR) article on his >> website and figured I'll need an external sound card. I've also >> checked >> out the FreeDV website and downloaded the software. Now I'm >> looking at >> SignaLink and also West Mountain Radio RIGblaster. The facts are >> though, I haven't got much of a clue, so any help will be great. >> >> Has anyone used either of these products with the KX3 for FreeDV? >> Any >> recommendations ? >> >> Thanks to all in advance >> >> 73 Kev VK5KS >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >> >> >> -- >> Jim K0XU >> jim at rhodesend.net > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From d.cutter at ntlworld.com Wed Apr 17 11:41:51 2019 From: d.cutter at ntlworld.com (CUTTER DAVID) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:41:51 +0100 (BST) Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia? In-Reply-To: <1090423612.1440617.1555374148138@mail2.virginmedia.com> References: <1D75D7CA-26F7-4AF0-B165-87E813E9835E@mac.com> <1090423612.1440617.1555374148138@mail2.virginmedia.com> Message-ID: <636514350.1455227.1555515711735@mail2.virginmedia.com> From w5sum at comcast.net Wed Apr 17 11:45:55 2019 From: w5sum at comcast.net (w5sum at comcast.net) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:45:55 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] P3 sensor questions In-Reply-To: <546B162E-ED7C-4BA6-BD38-EC4744C874D2@wilcoxengineering.com> References: <546B162E-ED7C-4BA6-BD38-EC4744C874D2@wilcoxengineering.com> Message-ID: <070C403F5CE947519D9EA9D19D051C54@MININTMC1HLDC> Having become the proud father of a KPA1500, I am enjoying it a lot. I use a 160M Full Wave Loop on Ant 1 and my Sommer log fed yagi on Ant 2. I only have one 2KW HF Sensor for my P-3 and currently have it hooked up to Ant2. I would love to also have one hooked up to Ant 1, but the P3 has only ONE sensor input. How do any of you get around this? My only thought is to use only one antenna port out of the KPA1500, to an antenna switch, but this negates the auto band switching of ports in the KPA. looking for answer here. thanks Ronnie W5SUM From lmarion at mt.net Wed Apr 17 11:47:47 2019 From: lmarion at mt.net (lmarion) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:47:47 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft's philosophy of community input on productdesign In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 20 plus years ago I slung some wire in a tree with a fishing pole at Yellow Stone Park and hooked it to a QRP Sierra. Was trying to activate scarce Wyoming and the park. The only call I got on my CQs was N6KR. That's another one of those things that makes Elecraft unique among well-known amateur radio bands. 72 Leroy AB7CE -----Original Message----- From: Wayne Burdick Sent: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 9:56 AM To: Elecraft Reflector Cc: KX3 at yahoogroups.com Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft's philosophy of community input on productdesign It has often been stated, by both Elecraft and our customers, that we leverage user input as we flesh out new products. In this article I'll clarify our development model, hopefully elevating it above hearsay. It's intentional and methodical. We like to think it's one of the things that makes Elecraft unique among well-known amateur radio brands. * * * From n1al at sonic.net Wed Apr 17 12:16:57 2019 From: n1al at sonic.net (Alan) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:16:57 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] P3 sensor questions In-Reply-To: <070C403F5CE947519D9EA9D19D051C54@MININTMC1HLDC> References: <546B162E-ED7C-4BA6-BD38-EC4744C874D2@wilcoxengineering.com> <070C403F5CE947519D9EA9D19D051C54@MININTMC1HLDC> Message-ID: <4121a4f9-ea6d-e1cc-edf7-24202d465619@sonic.net> Here's what I use.? It allows switching up to four sensors to one P3: https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B00AUB3SSA/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 Amazon says it is "currently unavailable" but if you search for "8p8C manual switch" you should be able to find other options. You want to be sure to get a manual switch not an Ethernet network switch, which has electronics inside and is a different animal. Alan N1AL On 4/17/19 8:45 AM, w5sum at comcast.net wrote: > Having become the proud father of a KPA1500, I am enjoying it a lot. I > use a 160M Full Wave Loop on Ant 1 and my Sommer log fed yagi on Ant > 2.? I only have one 2KW HF Sensor for my P-3 and currently have it > hooked up to Ant2. I would love to also have one hooked up to Ant 1, > but the P3 has only ONE sensor input.? How do any of you get around > this? My only thought is to use only one antenna port out of the > KPA1500, to an antenna switch, but this negates the auto band > switching of ports in the KPA. > > looking for answer here. > > thanks > > Ronnie W5SUM From hlyingst at yahoo.com Wed Apr 17 13:13:25 2019 From: hlyingst at yahoo.com (Harry Yingst) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 17:13:25 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] P3 Power Monitor - Auto Scale ? References: <1011578980.991778.1555521205864.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1011578980.991778.1555521205864@mail.yahoo.com> Is there a way to make the power meter in the P3 auto scale like the W2 does? Thank you From k6dgw at foothill.net Wed Apr 17 13:59:05 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 10:59:05 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: <4A3C3433-AD4F-4C96-B352-F4D30E152773@wunderwood.org> References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> <4A3C3433-AD4F-4C96-B352-F4D30E152773@wunderwood.org> Message-ID: Long long ago when I was still a teenager and knew everything, I used an extra J-38 mounted on a piece of plywood for a footswitch.? As I remember it worked quite well.? I don't remember what sort of plug the TX required but I must have made it work.? Awful lot of traffic here for a SPST foot-operated switch. [:-) 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/16/2019 10:18 PM, Walter Underwood wrote: > The last time this was discussed, there were many satisfied users of the Linemaster Treadlite II foot switch. Here is one with an un-connectored cord. As you check out the reviews on the variations of the Treadlite II, you?ll find the ?yeah, had one on a drill press for twenty years? reviews. > > https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B002P53WQM/ > > wunder > K6WRU > Walter Underwood > CM87wj > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > >> On Apr 16, 2019, at 9:13 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: >> >> Gee folks, we can build our own transmitters and amplifiers and experiment with them on the air. >> >> Why is it so hard to get an RCA plug, cut off the 1/4 inch phone plug and solder on an RCA plug? >> Much easier than searching for an adapter. >> >> 73, >> Don W3FPR >> >> On 4/16/2019 9:05 PM, Michael Gillen via Elecraft wrote: >>> Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. >>> I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. >>> I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). >>> So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? >>> Recommendations? >>> Thanks, >>> Michael >>> KK6RWK >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From dl2mdu at darc.de Wed Apr 17 15:02:03 2019 From: dl2mdu at darc.de (Christian Friess) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 21:02:03 +0200 (CEST) Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> <4A3C3433-AD4F-4C96-B352-F4D30E152773@wunderwood.org> Message-ID: <20190417190203.40A027DA05F4@dd7438.kasserver.com> From ajzadiraka at gmail.com Wed Apr 17 15:30:25 2019 From: ajzadiraka at gmail.com (Allan Zadiraka) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:30:25 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Modularity In-Reply-To: <2389FBB1-3426-48E5-8B7F-BF36BF7E7A4F@gmail.com> References: <2389FBB1-3426-48E5-8B7F-BF36BF7E7A4F@gmail.com> Message-ID: I agree with Victor's comments. I am all in favor of the elimination of the all-in-one, big box rigs. No vendor in the amateur radio market can be the premiere supplier in all areas even though Elecraft is trying hard. I don't consider them the best panadapter HMI vendor or best paddle manufacturer. What I would consider ideal is a rig, computer, and other "boxes" which sit behind or below the operating desk (or at a remote site). On the desk, a keyboard, mouse and/or trackball, an advanced KPod with a few more knobs and customizable LCD keys for the major rig control and antenna functions and monitor(s) for the waterfall, frequency readouts, SWR/POWER indicators, RF waveform display and logging displays. An enclosure to corral all the miscellaneous "boxes" and their wiring would also be nice. zeke, ab8oou On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 1:13 AM Vic Rosenthal wrote: > All this talk about onboard computers (or not) and operating systems in > the K4 has me thinking. > My K3 is serial no. 0007. I have had it since the beginning, and with a > few simple upgrades, it is almost as capable as a new K3S. But the > computers I had back then are long gone. > What I would like to have in the K4 is a backplane architecture. The > entire radio except for a control head would be located on plugin boards > that could be swapped out easily for testing, customizing, or upgrading. > The ENTIRE radio. The K3 goes in this direction, but not far enough. > One of the options would be an onboard computer. You could use the rig > without it or with an external computer if you wish. Maybe it would come > with some version of Linux, but you could put another version of Linux or > Windows on it if you wanted. You could upgrade it easily when it became > obsolete. > Yes, this would cost more. But with the savings available from modern > automated surface mount construction, maybe it?s possible. > > Victor 4X6GP > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From turnbull at net1.ie Wed Apr 17 16:12:21 2019 From: turnbull at net1.ie (Doug Turnbull) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 20:12:21 -0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Modularity In-Reply-To: References: <2389FBB1-3426-48E5-8B7F-BF36BF7E7A4F@gmail.com> Message-ID: <72235A5C09E24DE9B6BE051F6F436C2C@DougTPC> Dear OMs and YLs, For me the K3 epitomizes modularity. One can build the radio up over time and purchase only those features required. This keeps entry level prices down and enhances repair. From Ireland, one could return a faulty module perhaps holding on to the K3/S and continuing to operate. I hope Elecraft continues this approach. Yes and keep the power supply separate. I find the P3 is pretty good especially with an external monitor. Maybe the next display will be more like what Flex offers but for me Elecraft beats Flex in most regards. Oh, thanks Elecraft for the K-pod. 73 Doug EI2CN -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Allan Zadiraka Sent: 17 April 2019 19:30 To: Vic Rosenthal Cc: Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Modularity I agree with Victor's comments. I am all in favor of the elimination of the all-in-one, big box rigs. No vendor in the amateur radio market can be the premiere supplier in all areas even though Elecraft is trying hard. I don't consider them the best panadapter HMI vendor or best paddle manufacturer. What I would consider ideal is a rig, computer, and other "boxes" which sit behind or below the operating desk (or at a remote site). On the desk, a keyboard, mouse and/or trackball, an advanced KPod with a few more knobs and customizable LCD keys for the major rig control and antenna functions and monitor(s) for the waterfall, frequency readouts, SWR/POWER indicators, RF waveform display and logging displays. An enclosure to corral all the miscellaneous "boxes" and their wiring would also be nice. zeke, ab8oou On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 1:13 AM Vic Rosenthal wrote: > All this talk about onboard computers (or not) and operating systems in > the K4 has me thinking. > My K3 is serial no. 0007. I have had it since the beginning, and with a > few simple upgrades, it is almost as capable as a new K3S. But the > computers I had back then are long gone. > What I would like to have in the K4 is a backplane architecture. The > entire radio except for a control head would be located on plugin boards > that could be swapped out easily for testing, customizing, or upgrading. > The ENTIRE radio. The K3 goes in this direction, but not far enough. > One of the options would be an onboard computer. You could use the rig > without it or with an external computer if you wish. Maybe it would come > with some version of Linux, but you could put another version of Linux or > Windows on it if you wanted. You could upgrade it easily when it became > obsolete. > Yes, this would cost more. But with the savings available from modern > automated surface mount construction, maybe it's possible. > > Victor 4X6GP > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From hbjr at optilink.us Wed Apr 17 16:34:59 2019 From: hbjr at optilink.us (HB) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:34:59 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: <5ab30eb2-ae51-eea1-fb4a-6dbf68593f96@blomand.net> References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> <5ab30eb2-ae51-eea1-fb4a-6dbf68593f96@blomand.net> Message-ID: <2E5EE1E8-AD02-4AEB-96CA-5F22196E3AA5@optilink.us> I had a Heil FS and desoldered the 1/4? and resoldered a right angle RCA plug for the K3S. Works great! Hank K4HYJ > On Apr 17, 2019, at 8:29 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > > Yes and the length of the 1/4" phone plug plus the length of the adapter to an RCA connector is something of serious length sticking out behind the radio. Sure is a grand opportunity to get the radio RCA connector damaged. Estimated total length of the albatross is about 3". Not on my radio! > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX > >> On 4/16/2019 11:13 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: >> Gee folks, we can build our own transmitters and amplifiers and experiment with them on the air. >> >> Why is it so hard to get an RCA plug, cut off the 1/4 inch phone plug and solder on an RCA plug? >> Much easier than searching for an adapter. >> >> 73, >> Don W3FPR >> >>> On 4/16/2019 9:05 PM, Michael Gillen via Elecraft wrote: >>> Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. >>> >>> I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. >>> >>> I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). >>> >>> So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? >>> >>> Recommendations? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Michael >>> KK6RWK >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From ve3nr at bell.net Wed Apr 17 17:28:00 2019 From: ve3nr at bell.net (Bert) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 17:28:00 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: <2E5EE1E8-AD02-4AEB-96CA-5F22196E3AA5@optilink.us> References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> <5ab30eb2-ae51-eea1-fb4a-6dbf68593f96@blomand.net> <2E5EE1E8-AD02-4AEB-96CA-5F22196E3AA5@optilink.us> Message-ID: Who uses RCA connectors these days? I thought they were long gone. Bert VE3NR On 4/17/2019 4:34 PM, HB wrote: > I had a Heil FS and desoldered the 1/4? and resoldered a right angle RCA plug for the K3S. Works great! > > Hank > K4HYJ > >> On Apr 17, 2019, at 8:29 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: >> >> Yes and the length of the 1/4" phone plug plus the length of the adapter to an RCA connector is something of serious length sticking out behind the radio. Sure is a grand opportunity to get the radio RCA connector damaged. Estimated total length of the albatross is about 3". Not on my radio! >> >> 73 >> >> Bob, K4TAX >> >>> On 4/16/2019 11:13 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: >>> Gee folks, we can build our own transmitters and amplifiers and experiment with them on the air. >>> >>> Why is it so hard to get an RCA plug, cut off the 1/4 inch phone plug and solder on an RCA plug? >>> Much easier than searching for an adapter. >>> >>> 73, >>> Don W3FPR >>> >>>> On 4/16/2019 9:05 PM, Michael Gillen via Elecraft wrote: >>>> Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. >>>> >>>> I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. >>>> >>>> I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). >>>> >>>> So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? >>>> >>>> Recommendations? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Michael >>>> KK6RWK >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>> >>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rmcgraw at blomand.net Wed Apr 17 17:49:38 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 16:49:38 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: <2E5EE1E8-AD02-4AEB-96CA-5F22196E3AA5@optilink.us> References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> <5ab30eb2-ae51-eea1-fb4a-6dbf68593f96@blomand.net> <2E5EE1E8-AD02-4AEB-96CA-5F22196E3AA5@optilink.us> Message-ID: <275f0c2f-4a78-85ab-7b19-40acd2ef94a9@blomand.net> Smart man! 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/17/2019 3:34 PM, HB wrote: > I had a Heil FS and desoldered the 1/4? and resoldered a right angle RCA plug for the K3S. Works great! > > Hank > K4HYJ > >> On Apr 17, 2019, at 8:29 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: >> >> Yes and the length of the 1/4" phone plug plus the length of the adapter to an RCA connector is something of serious length sticking out behind the radio. Sure is a grand opportunity to get the radio RCA connector damaged. Estimated total length of the albatross is about 3". Not on my radio! >> >> 73 >> >> Bob, K4TAX >> >>> On 4/16/2019 11:13 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: >>> Gee folks, we can build our own transmitters and amplifiers and experiment with them on the air. >>> >>> Why is it so hard to get an RCA plug, cut off the 1/4 inch phone plug and solder on an RCA plug? >>> Much easier than searching for an adapter. >>> >>> 73, >>> Don W3FPR >>> >>>> On 4/16/2019 9:05 PM, Michael Gillen via Elecraft wrote: >>>> Hi guys! I searched around a bit nothing conclusive so thought I?d ask. >>>> >>>> I am needing a foot switch for my K3s which is also connected to my KPA500/KAT500 setup. >>>> >>>> I purchased a Heil FS-3 however it has a 1/4? phono plug on it and the K3s has an RCA jack (like a dummy I did not look at the back of the radio before I bought it). >>>> >>>> So, recommend an adapter or I can take this one back to HRO and get something else? >>>> >>>> Recommendations? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Michael >>>> KK6RWK >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>> >>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From elanzl at sbcglobal.net Wed Apr 17 17:54:21 2019 From: elanzl at sbcglobal.net (Eric Lanzl) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 21:54:21 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft SSB Net References: <439495637.1173892.1555538061554.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <439495637.1173892.1555538061554@mail.yahoo.com> Here is the log from last Sunday's ssb net. Elecraft SSB Net 4- 14-2019 WB9JNZ ????????Eric?????IL????? ?K3????????? ??4017?? ?Net Control N9SRA ????????? Steve?? IL?????? Kenwood ts 480 NC0JW?????????? Jim????? CO????? KX3???? ??? 1356???Relay station K7BRR??????????? Bill?????? AZ????? K3S?????? 10939 W7QHD????????? Kurt ??? AZ?????? K2/100 ?? ?1538 N6PGQ?????????? Bob????? CA????? KX3???? ?? ? 5891 K8NU/P?????????? Carl???? OH????? FT 2000?????????? Remotein Washington State KE5SO??????????? Joel???? CO????? K3??????? ??? 1503 KS6F?????????????? Guy???? CA????? K3S???? ?? 10650 N0MPM????????? Mile???? IA???????? K3S???? ?? 10514 N6VWE?????????? Stan???? MI?????? K3????????????? 650 K6SBA??????????? David?? CA?????? K3??????? ?????? 565 K6ADG?????????? Alan???? CA????? K3??????? ???? 4757 WM6P ??????????? Steve ? GA??? ?? K3S ???? ????11453??Relay station VA1RST????????? Roger? NS????? ? IC 7300?????former K3 75 KE7FSD????????? Al???????? AZ????? ? K3??????? ???? 8532 K7JG?????????????? John??? WA?????? KX3???? ??????3519 KL0RG??????????? Kevin?? AK????? ?? KX3???? ?????8519 NA5C????????????? Steve?? TX????????? K3S???? ???10121 ? From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Wed Apr 17 18:31:33 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:31:33 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> <5ab30eb2-ae51-eea1-fb4a-6dbf68593f96@blomand.net> <2E5EE1E8-AD02-4AEB-96CA-5F22196E3AA5@optilink.us> Message-ID: On 4/17/2019 2:28 PM, Bert wrote: > Who uses RCA connectors these days? I thought they were long gone. Higher quality semi-pro audio products use RCA connectors, and high quality RCA (and 1/8-in) cable-mounted connectors made by Switchcraft and Neutrik are widely available from audio vendors like Full Compass and Sweetwater. 73, Jim K9YC From john at kk9a.com Wed Apr 17 20:01:20 2019 From: john at kk9a.com (john at kk9a.com) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 19:01:20 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch Message-ID: <20190417190120.Horde.P39zgKGb77Er3fwhOL79PGn@www11.qth.com> I have not seen a HF ham station that did not use RCA connectors. John KK9A Bert ve3nr wrote: Who uses RCA connectors these days? I thought they were long gone. Bert VE3NR From eric.csuf at gmail.com Wed Apr 17 20:14:28 2019 From: eric.csuf at gmail.com (EricJ) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 17:14:28 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Modularity In-Reply-To: References: <2389FBB1-3426-48E5-8B7F-BF36BF7E7A4F@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4febfd29-6007-9184-12ff-ac032b7c6fd2@gmail.com> For me, that would be ham radio hell. My ideal radio has knobs. A big one for tuning, little ones for other things. Knobs and buttons. I'm not knocking Flex at all, but if that were the only radio or all radios worked like that, I'd just do woodworking. Some people like tuning. Some people like point-and-shoot. Knobs for the former, panadapters for the latter. Don W3FPR lamented earlier that hams no longer seem to know how to wire up a simple cable with a different connector at each end. I lament that hams no longer seem to be able to tune or enjoy the experience. I think Elecraft understands both kinds of hams. Eric KE6US On 4/17/2019 12:30 PM, Allan Zadiraka wrote: > I agree with Victor's comments. I am all in favor of the elimination of > the all-in-one, big box rigs. No vendor in the amateur radio market can be > the premiere supplier in all areas even though Elecraft is trying hard. I > don't consider them the best panadapter HMI vendor or best paddle > manufacturer. What I would consider ideal is a rig, computer, and other > "boxes" which sit behind or below the operating desk (or at a remote > site). On the desk, a keyboard, mouse and/or trackball, an advanced KPod > with a few more knobs and customizable LCD keys for the major rig control > and antenna functions and monitor(s) for the waterfall, frequency > readouts, SWR/POWER indicators, RF waveform display and logging displays. > > An enclosure to corral all the miscellaneous "boxes" and their wiring would > also be nice. > > > zeke, ab8oou > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2019 at 1:13 AM Vic Rosenthal wrote: > >> All this talk about onboard computers (or not) and operating systems in >> the K4 has me thinking. >> My K3 is serial no. 0007. I have had it since the beginning, and with a >> few simple upgrades, it is almost as capable as a new K3S. But the >> computers I had back then are long gone. >> What I would like to have in the K4 is a backplane architecture. The >> entire radio except for a control head would be located on plugin boards >> that could be swapped out easily for testing, customizing, or upgrading. >> The ENTIRE radio. The K3 goes in this direction, but not far enough. >> One of the options would be an onboard computer. You could use the rig >> without it or with an external computer if you wish. Maybe it would come >> with some version of Linux, but you could put another version of Linux or >> Windows on it if you wanted. You could upgrade it easily when it became >> obsolete. >> Yes, this would cost more. But with the savings available from modern >> automated surface mount construction, maybe it?s possible. >> >> Victor 4X6GP >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rmcgraw at blomand.net Wed Apr 17 20:28:56 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 19:28:56 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Modularity In-Reply-To: <4febfd29-6007-9184-12ff-ac032b7c6fd2@gmail.com> References: <2389FBB1-3426-48E5-8B7F-BF36BF7E7A4F@gmail.com> <4febfd29-6007-9184-12ff-ac032b7c6fd2@gmail.com> Message-ID: <9e3a3ca5-c251-c795-fc68-ed4dc6f4e57b@blomand.net> When asked "what is the best radio?" I think Rob Sherwood summed it up saying in a few words? "the one you enjoy using". 73 Bob, K4TAX From wa2si at arrl.net Wed Apr 17 21:35:48 2019 From: wa2si at arrl.net (WA2SI) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:35:48 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft Gray Touch Up Paint available for the K1 and K2 In-Reply-To: <4150AEFF.2050707@elecraft.com> References: <4150AEFF.2050707@elecraft.com> Message-ID: <1555551348515-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Good evening, I know this is an old post, however, "here goes nuthin'!" Does anybodt have any spare touch-up paint for the K1/K2? My KAT100 has a small nick in the side panel edge and I'd like to touch it up. Tnx in advance. As always, take care es... Vy 73 de Bert WA2SI -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From k6dgw at foothill.net Wed Apr 17 21:51:50 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 18:51:50 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Recommend a K3s foot switch In-Reply-To: References: <06A2B856-341E-4204-9AD3-281D856A0CA4@yahoo.com> <5ab30eb2-ae51-eea1-fb4a-6dbf68593f96@blomand.net> <2E5EE1E8-AD02-4AEB-96CA-5F22196E3AA5@optilink.us> Message-ID: There's one on the back of your K3 if you have one of those. 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/17/2019 2:28 PM, Bert wrote: > Who uses RCA connectors these days? I thought they were long gone. > > Bert VE3NR From bconder at yahoo.com Wed Apr 17 22:23:04 2019 From: bconder at yahoo.com (Bob Conder) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 02:23:04 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] IF Output ? References: <1378758462.2352493.1555554184741.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1378758462.2352493.1555554184741@mail.yahoo.com> Is there a software setting in the Config menu to activate the IF Output on the KXV3?Or, is it always "on" & generating a signal?TIA,Bob K4RLC From eric at elecraft.com Wed Apr 17 22:55:48 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz WA6HHQ - Elecraft) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 19:55:48 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] IF Output ? In-Reply-To: <1378758462.2352493.1555554184741@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1378758462.2352493.1555554184741.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1378758462.2352493.1555554184741@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi Bob, The K3 and K3S IF output is on all the time. 73, Eric elecraft.com --- Sent from my iPhone 6S > On Apr 17, 2019, at 7:23 PM, Bob Conder via Elecraft wrote: > > Is there a software setting in the Config menu to activate the IF Output on the KXV3?Or, is it always "on" & generating a signal?TIA,Bob K4RLC > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From bconder at yahoo.com Wed Apr 17 22:59:35 2019 From: bconder at yahoo.com (Bob Conder) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 02:59:35 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] IF Output ? In-Reply-To: References: <1378758462.2352493.1555554184741.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1378758462.2352493.1555554184741@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <269003257.2352184.1555556375354@mail.yahoo.com> Eric, Tnx for quick reply & info.Can't blame my problem on that :-)Bob K4RLC From: Eric Swartz WA6HHQ - Elecraft To: Bob Conder Cc: Elecraft list Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 10:55 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] IF Output ? Hi Bob, The K3 and K3S IF output is on all the time.? 73, Ericelecraft.com ---Sent from my iPhone 6S On Apr 17, 2019, at 7:23 PM, Bob Conder via Elecraft wrote: Is there a software setting in the Config menu to activate the IF Output on the KXV3?Or, is it always "on" & generating a signal?TIA,Bob K4RLC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From dean.k2ww at gmail.com Thu Apr 18 04:11:38 2019 From: dean.k2ww at gmail.com (Dean L) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 04:11:38 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft's philosophy of community input on product design In-Reply-To: <1110f874-c081-38e4-3fc9-3c9adcec36bb@nk7z.net> References: <2906753f-1112-8364-3fa6-8c1b5220587f@nk7z.net> <291a02e4-6b50-3447-5f10-6b5a430e76da@embarqmail.com> <1110f874-c081-38e4-3fc9-3c9adcec36bb@nk7z.net> Message-ID: ###### snip>>>indicate relatively soon... I think he meant more like SOMEDAY.... 73 Dean K2WW She'll be coming around the mountain when she comes From bobdehaney at gmx.net Thu Apr 18 04:55:42 2019 From: bobdehaney at gmx.net (Bob DeHaney) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:55:42 +0200 Subject: [Elecraft] RCA Connectors i.e Phono Plugs Message-ID: <000001d4f5c4$80ee6810$82cb3830$@gmx.net> They?re not long gone, nowadays they call them Cinch connectors. Not only Hams use them but most AVR and Stereo manufacturers. Take a look at a High End HI-FI or AVR rear side. Vy 73 de Bob DJ0RD/WU5T From scotts at sandycove-ns.ca Thu Apr 18 06:14:36 2019 From: scotts at sandycove-ns.ca (John Scott) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 07:14:36 -0300 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft Digest, Vol 180, Issue 20 Foot Switch In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <40861169-e396-fd46-7f81-0d2123175dd2@sandycove-ns.ca> I made my own, years ago!? It's just an old plastic base Radio Shack (I think) CW key mounted on a board with the appropriate connector.? Works like? a charm.? Cheap! John, VE1JS On 2019-04-17 23:56, elecraft-request at mailman.qth.net wrote: > Send Elecraft mailing list submissions to > elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > elecraft-request at mailman.qth.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > elecraft-owner at mailman.qth.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Elecraft digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Recommend a K3s foot switch (hawley, charles j jr) > 2. Re: Recommend a K3s foot switch (Bill) > 3. Re: Recommend a K3s foot switch (john at kk9a.com) > 4. WTB K2 metal panels (Alan D. Wilcox) > 5. Re: KX3 and FreeDV (Walter Underwood) > 6. Re: Visalia? (CUTTER DAVID) > 7. P3 sensor questions (w5sum at comcast.net) > 8. Re: Elecraft's philosophy of community input on productdesign > (lmarion) > 9. Re: P3 sensor questions (Alan) > 10. P3 Power Monitor - Auto Scale ? (Harry Yingst) > 11. Re: Recommend a K3s foot switch (Fred Jensen) > 12. Re: Recommend a K3s foot switch (Christian Friess) > 13. Re: Modularity (Allan Zadiraka) > 14. Re: Modularity (Doug Turnbull) > 15. Re: Recommend a K3s foot switch (HB) > 16. Re: Recommend a K3s foot switch (Bert) > 17. Re: Recommend a K3s foot switch (Bob McGraw K4TAX) > 18. Elecraft SSB Net (Eric Lanzl) > 19. Re: Recommend a K3s foot switch (Jim Brown) > 20. Re: Recommend a K3s foot switch (john at kk9a.com) > 21. Re: Modularity (EricJ) > 22. Re: Modularity (Bob McGraw K4TAX) > 23. Re: Elecraft Gray Touch Up Paint available for the K1 and K2 > (WA2SI) > 24. Re: Recommend a K3s foot switch (Fred Jensen) > 25. IF Output ? (Bob Conder) > 26. Re: IF Output ? (Eric Swartz WA6HHQ - Elecraft) > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > You must be a subscriber to post. > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From gkidder at ilstu.edu Thu Apr 18 08:02:10 2019 From: gkidder at ilstu.edu (Kidder, George) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 12:02:10 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft Digest, Vol 180, Issue 20 Foot Switch In-Reply-To: <40861169-e396-fd46-7f81-0d2123175dd2@sandycove-ns.ca> References: <40861169-e396-fd46-7f81-0d2123175dd2@sandycove-ns.ca> Message-ID: Ditto.? Made mine from an old microswitch from junk box, some pine boards and a hinge.? Been working for a decade, and still using it - plugged in, of course, to the antique RCA jack on the back of the K3! ;-) George, W3HBM On 4/18/2019 6:14 AM, John Scott wrote: > [This message came from an external source. If suspicious, report to > abuse at ilstu.edu] > > I made my own, years ago!? It's just an old plastic base Radio Shack (I > think) CW key mounted on a board with the appropriate connector. Works > like? a charm.? Cheap! > > John, VE1JS > > From k2asp at kanafi.org Thu Apr 18 09:44:13 2019 From: k2asp at kanafi.org (Phil Kane) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 06:44:13 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] RCA Connectors i.e Phono Plugs In-Reply-To: <000001d4f5c4$80ee6810$82cb3830$@gmx.net> References: <000001d4f5c4$80ee6810$82cb3830$@gmx.net> Message-ID: <1e4c59af-27a3-e6e7-1cd4-a8bf14581802@kanafi.org> On 4/18/2019 1:55 AM, Bob DeHaney wrote: > They?re not long gone, nowadays they call them Cinch connectors. Those of us who have been around for a long time know what a *real* Cinch connector looks like, and those "RCA" connectors do not. -- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 >From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon From nu4i at cox.net Thu Apr 18 10:13:08 2019 From: nu4i at cox.net (Kenneth Moorman) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:13:08 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Parts of My K2 Station For Sale Message-ID: <001f01d4f5f0$d9d925b0$8d8b7110$@cox.net> I have decided to sell some of my favorite amateur radio items and hopefully find homes for them where they can be used more often than I now can use them. KPA100 100 watt Amplifier KAT100 100 watt ATU EC2 Enclosure The KPA100 and the KAT100 have been installed in the EC2 Enclosure making it a perfect match to the K2 Transceiver in appearance and function. This is a perfectly operational unit with no cosmetic issues and comes from a nonsmoking home. Current pricing for the amplifier and ATU (exclusive from the enclosure which is no longer available) is $1020. I would like $700 plus shipping. Gamma Research HPS-1A 13.8V Power Supply This supply is rated at 5 amps continuous or 22 amps at 25% duty cycle and is able to power 100 watt RF amplifiers at normal CW or SSB operation. Its dimensions are 3.37" x 1.55" x 5.25" and it weighs only 1.25 lbs. It comes with an adapter to the K2/10 and Anderson Power Poles to the first unit above. Current price is $229. It works perfectly with no cosmetic issues. I would like $150 plus shipping. Begali Magnetic Traveler Iambic Paddle This key is in perfect condition both mechanically and cosmetically and has (sadly) only been used at home. It is designed for use in the field and has folding "wings" both for stability and protection of the aluminum finger pieces. Its current price is about $290. I would like $190 plus shipping. Contact me direct (only) at: nu4i(at)cox.net I can supply photos of all units upon request and PayPal is fine. Ken Moorman, NU4I From robkan at mail.dk Thu Apr 18 10:26:13 2019 From: robkan at mail.dk (robkan at mail.dk) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:26:13 +0200 Subject: [Elecraft] P3 Display issue Message-ID: <001b01d4f5f2$ad91eee0$08b5cca0$@mail.dk> Hi - I must be a complete idiot, but I just cannot get this to work for me. I am looking at my P3 connected to a K3. It is connected between the IF In on the P3 and IF Out on the K3. When looking at the P3 display, on all frequencies, I do not see the actual frequency of the VFO, I see 0, for example to top line has -25.0 0 +25.0. On top of that, when I use marker A and move it and press the QSY, nothing happens. What am I doing wrong. The User Guide just says how it should work, but not why it is displaying 0 as center frequency? Thanks, Robin OZ6ABM/5P5R From oz6abm at qsl.net Thu Apr 18 10:32:38 2019 From: oz6abm at qsl.net (oz6abm at qsl.net) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:32:38 +0200 Subject: [Elecraft] P3 Display issues... Message-ID: <002101d4f5f3$92ce7910$b86b6b30$@qsl.net> Hi - I just cannot get this to work for me. I am looking at my P3 connected to a K3. It is connected between the IF In on the P3 and IF Out on the K3. When looking at the P3 display, on all frequencies, I do not see the actual frequency of the VFO, I see 0, for example to top line has -25.0 0 +25.0. On top of that, when I use marker A and move it and press the QSY, nothing happens. What am I doing wrong. The User Guide just says how it should work, but not why it is displaying 0 as center frequency? Thanks, Robin OZ6ABM/5P5R From donwilh at embarqmail.com Thu Apr 18 10:37:41 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:37:41 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] P3 Display issue In-Reply-To: <001b01d4f5f2$ad91eee0$08b5cca0$@mail.dk> References: <001b01d4f5f2$ad91eee0$08b5cca0$@mail.dk> Message-ID: <2a0e33eb-30ad-5f99-bcd3-80d74c2890a3@embarqmail.com> Robin, Do you have an RS-232 9 pin cable connected between the K3 RS232 connector and the XCVR connector on the K3? That cable is what carries the frequency and other information to the P3. For computer connection, connect the PC to the "PC" connector on the P3. If you have a K3S and are operating with the USB to K3S connection, then you would use the CBLP3Y cable between the RJ45 jack on the K3S and the P3. If you do have this arrangement, make certain the RJ45 plug is fully seated - push the RJ-45 plug in until it clicks, you may have to pull the cover back and seat the actual connector until it clicks home. As an added note - if you have previously attempted to put the K3S end of the USB cable into the RJ-45 jack, you likely damaged the RJ-45 jack and the KIO3B option will have to go back to Elecraft for replacement. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/18/2019 10:26 AM, Robin via Elecraft wrote: > Hi - > > I must be a complete idiot, but I just cannot get this to work for me. I am looking at my P3 connected to a K3. It is connected between the IF In on the P3 and IF Out on the K3. When looking at the P3 display, on all frequencies, I do not see the actual frequency of the VFO, I see 0, for example to top line has -25.0 0 +25.0. > From svholm54 at gmail.com Thu Apr 18 10:52:17 2019 From: svholm54 at gmail.com (Sverre Holm (LA3ZA)) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 07:52:17 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] IF Output ? In-Reply-To: <269003257.2352184.1555556375354@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1378758462.2352493.1555554184741@mail.yahoo.com> <269003257.2352184.1555556375354@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1555599137018-0.post@n2.nabble.com> I use the opportunity to follow up on this thread. The IF output of the K3 and K3S is centered on 8.215 MHz. But there is also a second IF at 12 kHz with no output. I wonder if anyone has made an output for the I- and Q- channels at 12 kHz. It looks fairly simple to find judging from the schematics. ----- Sverre, LA3ZA K2 #2198, K3 #3391, LA3ZA Blog: http://la3za.blogspot.com, LA3ZA Unofficial Guide to K2 modifications: http://la3za.blogspot.com/p/la3za-unofficial-guide-to-elecraft-k2.html -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From w2blc at nycap.rr.com Thu Apr 18 11:26:56 2019 From: w2blc at nycap.rr.com (Bill) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:26:56 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] RCA Connectors i.e Phono Plugs In-Reply-To: <1e4c59af-27a3-e6e7-1cd4-a8bf14581802@kanafi.org> References: <1e4c59af-27a3-e6e7-1cd4-a8bf14581802@kanafi.org> Message-ID: <07f5ed9c-f896-f349-5ce2-c1f66b5b5a73@nycap.rr.com> Cinch connectors like RCA plugs???? Not even similar. By the way, all those plugs and connectors out there are lacking one hugely great asset: An RC plug can be tightened if it becomes loose - just a little squeeze is all it takes. And, I would sure rather have several RCA jacks than a DIN plug to deal with when soldering!!! From d.cutter at ntlworld.com Thu Apr 18 11:38:28 2019 From: d.cutter at ntlworld.com (CUTTER DAVID) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:38:28 +0100 (BST) Subject: [Elecraft] Visalia? In-Reply-To: <636514350.1455227.1555515711735@mail2.virginmedia.com> References: <1D75D7CA-26F7-4AF0-B165-87E813E9835E@mac.com> <1090423612.1440617.1555374148138@mail2.virginmedia.com> <636514350.1455227.1555515711735@mail2.virginmedia.com> Message-ID: <1618284738.11756.1555601908162@mail2.virginmedia.com> Re VisaIia: I was interested in the new offering from N6BT (?) 40m vertical with integral ground plane, all in one rigid package. It looks very similar to a system suggested by Moxon many years ago. I tried that using wire, bamboo sticks and a fishing rod. I don't quite see how he could take a patent on it but it was a very neat package. David G3UNA > On 17 April 2019 at 16:41 CUTTER DAVID via Elecraft wrote: > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From kg9hfrank at gmail.com Thu Apr 18 11:44:01 2019 From: kg9hfrank at gmail.com (Frank Krozel) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:44:01 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Odd request Message-ID: <65E10FB1-6291-4EA3-8126-952C5BE4B17D@gmail.com> So I have been using my K1 for a few weeks now, radio seems v-e-r-y close to sound of my K2. I am done with it and want to move up to a K3, anyone? It is a 4 band K1 with the autotunes built-in. Lighted readout. de KG9H Offline responses to KG9H at ARRL dot net From doug at kj0f.com Thu Apr 18 12:55:26 2019 From: doug at kj0f.com (Doug Person) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:55:26 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] FS: Unfinished K1 Message-ID: <602f29e9-02c3-99ec-7199-c82af8016498@kj0f.com> I have an unfinished K1 for sale. It's about 80% done. I am unable to finish it. 40/20 filter board. Email direct for questions. $300 shipped CONUS. -- 73 de Doug -- KJ0F From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Thu Apr 18 13:39:11 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 10:39:11 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] RCA Connectors i.e Phono Plugs In-Reply-To: <1e4c59af-27a3-e6e7-1cd4-a8bf14581802@kanafi.org> References: <000001d4f5c4$80ee6810$82cb3830$@gmx.net> <1e4c59af-27a3-e6e7-1cd4-a8bf14581802@kanafi.org> Message-ID: <31816e32-fb9b-5d0d-f4be-02e6c599ef7c@audiosystemsgroup.com> On 4/18/2019 6:44 AM, Phil Kane wrote: > On 4/18/2019 1:55 AM, Bob DeHaney wrote: >> They?re not long gone, nowadays they call them Cinch connectors. > Those of us who have been around for a long time know what a *real* > Cinch connector looks like, and those "RCA" connectors do not. Right -- a Cinch connector is VERY different. It has a square, rectangular, or round body with blade-like contacts on the male and receptacles on the female. 73, Jim K9YC From wrmoore47 at gmail.com Thu Apr 18 14:57:56 2019 From: wrmoore47 at gmail.com (Randy Moore) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:57:56 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3/P3, KX3/PX3, KX2+accessories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Another update to the equipment I'm selling for Craig,NM4T. Remaining are the K3 and the KeyLogGo with keyboard. The price of the K3 has been reduced again. I've added some words about the functionality of the KeyLogGo, which makes a nice addition to any portable radio operation! 73, Randy, KS4L ================================================================== K3/100 (basic K3 was factory assembled, with internal options added later) including: Filters: 6.0 KHz, 2.8 KHz, 1.0 KHz, 400 Hz KTCX03-1 KAT3 KDVR3 KXV3A Heil Hand Mic KUSB Power Cable (not shown in the photos) Note: this K3 has not had any K3S upgrades *REDUCED to $1995* + shipping Images: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/0o9dwxp1urd52zu/AACmOTqoeein9HyHunszvMGua?dl=0 _______________________________________________________________________________ QRPWorks KeyLogGo Full K1EL WinKeyer,including standalone mode Twenty 80-character message memories Iambic A/B, Ultimatic, and Bug modes Adjustable weighting and dit/dah ratio Autospace and letterspace control Sidetone output with adjustable frequency Adjustable Speed 5-99 WPM Real-time sending via Paddle or Keyboard Multiple SOTA or any portable locations Logging Features: Auto call sign entry; Auto time/date stamp Frequency & mode auto-populated (KX2, KX3 and FT-817/818) Use keyboard or paddle for entries 1000 QSOs in non volatile memory ADIF export to PC; Search capability Special Elecraft KX2, KX3, K3, K3s Features include: Displays 80 characters of decoded text - CW, PSK or RTTY 80-character rig macros to control the KX3 Unique editable 20-character transmit buffer for digital modes. You can now backspace and correct typos in RTTY, PSK, and CW. Includes Adesso ACK-595PB lightweight keyboard KeyLogGo plus keyboard $150 + shipping Images: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/8d40vxhdsi94iod/AACIrzskHNyORYYOCpYutdFga?dl=0 ====================================== > From k6dgw at foothill.net Thu Apr 18 15:33:28 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 12:33:28 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] RCA Connectors i.e Phono Plugs In-Reply-To: <000001d4f5c4$80ee6810$82cb3830$@gmx.net> References: <000001d4f5c4$80ee6810$82cb3830$@gmx.net> Message-ID: <450d1143-bc7d-c747-d5bb-20fdc6825ae1@foothill.net> Hmmm ... not quite true.? Well, actually not even close.? For those who did not experience the middle of the 20th century and in the interest of historical accuracy: Cinch-Jones connectors were popular back then because they came in a variety of conductor numbers and were easy to assemble and solder, being big enough [in contrast to the abomination known as DIN connectors which came along later].? C-J connectors are square or rectangular, the "pins" are blade-like [see current day automobile fuses] with a self-wiping action on insertion, and they had a clamp device on the cable side that would grip the cable outer sheath.? They had the disadvantage that they could be pulled apart fairly easily.? I'm sure they're still around, I just haven't seen one in a few years. The RCA "Phono" connector accommodates two conductors, one of which is a chassis connection [or should be, see k9yc.com/groundingandbonding.pdf] I believe they appeared on the scene at the beginning of the "High Fidelity Component Era" about the time 45 and 33 1/3 RPM records appeared and were used for the audio paths between the various components of a hi-fi system. They are small, round, and you can increase the tightness of the shield connection by squeezing it slightly.? My K3 has one on the back which supplies power to the P3.? Nearly every TV sold at RC Willey, Best Buy, Frye's, Walmart, and Costco has a set of them for video and audio connection.? I like most folks have a dozen or so of the cables that come with those TV's out in the garage that are excess to our needs. 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/18/2019 1:55 AM, Bob DeHaney wrote: > They?re not long gone, nowadays they call them Cinch connectors. Not only Hams use them but most AVR and Stereo manufacturers. Take a look at a High End HI-FI or AVR rear side. > > Vy 73 de Bob DJ0RD/WU5T > From jackbrindle at me.com Thu Apr 18 15:42:39 2019 From: jackbrindle at me.com (Jack Brindle) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 12:42:39 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] RCA Connectors i.e Phono Plugs In-Reply-To: <31816e32-fb9b-5d0d-f4be-02e6c599ef7c@audiosystemsgroup.com> References: <000001d4f5c4$80ee6810$82cb3830$@gmx.net> <1e4c59af-27a3-e6e7-1cd4-a8bf14581802@kanafi.org> <31816e32-fb9b-5d0d-f4be-02e6c599ef7c@audiosystemsgroup.com> Message-ID: <3E269B84-4314-4680-9EEA-3F62C1DC2E24@me.com> Those are now known as ?Jones? connectors. No idea why the change, but they are becoming very hard to get with demand dropping. Easy for us to work with, but they take up a lot of rear-panel space on equipment. 731 Jack, W6FB > On Apr 18, 2019, at 10:39 AM, Jim Brown wrote: > > On 4/18/2019 6:44 AM, Phil Kane wrote: >> On 4/18/2019 1:55 AM, Bob DeHaney wrote: >>> They?re not long gone, nowadays they call them Cinch connectors. >> Those of us who have been around for a long time know what a *real* >> Cinch connector looks like, and those "RCA" connectors do not. > > Right -- a Cinch connector is VERY different. It has a square, rectangular, or round body with blade-like contacts on the male and receptacles on the female. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jc_ki7y at q.com Thu Apr 18 15:47:50 2019 From: jc_ki7y at q.com (James Cassidy) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 12:47:50 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] RCA Connectors i.e Phono Plugs In-Reply-To: <3E269B84-4314-4680-9EEA-3F62C1DC2E24@me.com> Message-ID: <8a2db7d2-3055-48fb-b247-74c8dd9a4842@email.android.com> From a.durbin at msn.com Thu Apr 18 15:54:39 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 19:54:39 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] RCA Connectors i.e Phono Plugs Message-ID: "Those are now known as ?Jones? connectors. No idea why the change, but they are becoming very hard to get with demand dropping." Still in production and available in a variety of configurations from multiple distributors at quite reasonable prices. Browse for "Cinch Jones". 73, Andy, k3wyc From ardrhi at gmail.com Thu Apr 18 16:08:41 2019 From: ardrhi at gmail.com (Gwen Patton) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:08:41 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] RCA Connectors i.e Phono Plugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I just built a Nanokeyer last night, and the connections for keyer and PTT are both RCA jacks. However, in the documentation, they are referred to as "cinch connectors". When cataloging the parts prior to building, I had to look in the construction pictures to verify what kind of connector was a "cinch" connector. I was rather surprised to see that RCA connectors have a different name now, but RCA hasn't been a thing for a long time now so I guess it was inevitable, seeing as it is listed as having gone defunct in 1986. The curious can find a short two minute video of my Nanokeyer's first testing here: https://youtu.be/_LLVS_Pk8zE The RCA jacks, referred to as "cinch connectors" in the documentation, are along the leading edge of the device, on the right side. Technically, though, that's the back edge. It's just in the foreground because the cable on my Bencher is short. 73, Gwen, NG3P On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 3:54 PM Andy Durbin wrote: > "Those are now known as ?Jones? connectors. No idea why the change, but > they are becoming very hard to get with demand dropping." > > Still in production and available in a variety of configurations from > multiple distributors at quite reasonable prices. > > Browse for "Cinch Jones". > > 73, > Andy, k3wyc > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > -- -+-+-+-+- Jenny Everywhere's Infinite: Quark Time http://quarktime.net From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Thu Apr 18 16:23:16 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:23:16 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Cinch Jones Connectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 4/18/2019 12:54 PM, Andy Durbin wrote: > Browse for "Cinch Jones". Yes. That's always been their correct name. Because of their relatively large footprint as compared to modern connectors, they are used primarily on legacy equipment. I have several '70s and '80s vintage "brick" amps for 2M and 440 MHz that use them. 73, Jim K9YC From k6dgw at foothill.net Thu Apr 18 16:30:19 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 13:30:19 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] RCA Connectors i.e Phono Plugs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <90c35735-a5d7-5986-ab80-f3826237b68f@foothill.net> The Nanokeyer is the creation of Oscar, DJ0MY.? It's possible that the RCA Phono connector is called a "Cinch" connector in EU or DL, but in the US [and I believe Canada], it is quite distinct from the "Cinch-Jones" connectors, which I find are still available from the several sources I checked. 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/18/2019 1:08 PM, Gwen Patton wrote: > I just built a Nanokeyer last night, and the connections for keyer and PTT > are both RCA jacks. However, in the documentation, they are referred to as > "cinch connectors". When cataloging the parts prior to building, I had to > look in the construction pictures to verify what kind of connector was a > "cinch" connector. I was rather surprised to see that RCA connectors have a > different name now, but RCA hasn't been a thing for a long time now so I > guess it was inevitable, seeing as it is listed as having gone defunct in > 1986. > > The curious can find a short two minute video of my Nanokeyer's first > testing here: https://youtu.be/_LLVS_Pk8zE > The RCA jacks, referred to as "cinch connectors" in the documentation, are > along the leading edge of the device, on the right side. Technically, > though, that's the back edge. It's just in the foreground because the cable > on my Bencher is short. > > 73, > Gwen, NG3P > > From roger at mulzer.de Thu Apr 18 17:26:53 2019 From: roger at mulzer.de (Roger) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 23:26:53 +0200 Subject: [Elecraft] P3 Display issues... In-Reply-To: <002101d4f5f3$92ce7910$b86b6b30$@qsl.net> References: <002101d4f5f3$92ce7910$b86b6b30$@qsl.net> Message-ID: <002101d4f62d$7160af70$54220e50$@mulzer.de> Sometimes it is even a loose connection - make sure you push the RJ-45 connector all the way in until it clicks. Sounds too stupid but happened to me once........... 73 Roger, DL5RBW -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of oz6abm at qsl.net Sent: Thursday, April 18, 2019 4:33 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] P3 Display issues... Hi - I just cannot get this to work for me. I am looking at my P3 connected to a K3. It is connected between the IF In on the P3 and IF Out on the K3. When looking at the P3 display, on all frequencies, I do not see the actual frequency of the VFO, I see 0, for example to top line has -25.0 0 +25.0. On top of that, when I use marker A and move it and press the QSY, nothing happens. What am I doing wrong. The User Guide just says how it should work, but not why it is displaying 0 as center frequency? Thanks, Robin OZ6ABM/5P5R ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From k2asp at kanafi.org Thu Apr 18 17:28:46 2019 From: k2asp at kanafi.org (Phil Kane) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 14:28:46 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Cinch Jones Connectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 4/18/2019 1:23 PM, Jim Brown wrote: > Yes. That's always been their correct name. Because of their relatively > large footprint as compared to modern connectors, they are used > primarily on legacy equipment. I have several '70s and '80s vintage > "brick" amps for 2M and 440 MHz that use them. I like them because I can get my arthritic hands around them and in the days when a soldering iron was not a "weapon of mass destruction" in my hands they were so easy to solder wires to.-- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 >From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon From k9yeq at live.com Thu Apr 18 18:36:11 2019 From: k9yeq at live.com (Bill Johnson) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 22:36:11 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] P3 sensor questions In-Reply-To: <4121a4f9-ea6d-e1cc-edf7-24202d465619@sonic.net> References: <546B162E-ED7C-4BA6-BD38-EC4744C874D2@wilcoxengineering.com> <070C403F5CE947519D9EA9D19D051C54@MININTMC1HLDC> <4121a4f9-ea6d-e1cc-edf7-24202d465619@sonic.net> Message-ID: Great suggestion... why didn't I think of that??? 73, Bill K9YEQ https://wrj-tech.com/ -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Alan Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 11:17 AM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] P3 sensor questions Here's what I use.? It allows switching up to four sensors to one P3: https://smile.amazon.com/gp/product/B00AUB3SSA/ref=oh_aui_detailpage_o04_s00?ie=UTF8&psc=1 Amazon says it is "currently unavailable" but if you search for "8p8C manual switch" you should be able to find other options. You want to be sure to get a manual switch not an Ethernet network switch, which has electronics inside and is a different animal. Alan N1AL On 4/17/19 8:45 AM, w5sum at comcast.net wrote: > Having become the proud father of a KPA1500, I am enjoying it a lot. I > use a 160M Full Wave Loop on Ant 1 and my Sommer log fed yagi on Ant > 2.? I only have one 2KW HF Sensor for my P-3 and currently have it > hooked up to Ant2. I would love to also have one hooked up to Ant 1, > but the P3 has only ONE sensor input.? How do any of you get around > this? My only thought is to use only one antenna port out of the > KPA1500, to an antenna switch, but this negates the auto band > switching of ports in the KPA. > > looking for answer here. > > thanks > > Ronnie W5SUM ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From ve3uvt at gmail.com Thu Apr 18 18:42:05 2019 From: ve3uvt at gmail.com (Chris) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 CAL FCTR problem Message-ID: Hi all, I have a K2/100 and a K2/10. I noticed that K2/100 is having an issue with the frequency calibration, so I decided to fix it today. When I set the band to 10m and connect my external GPSDO frequency counter and the FCTR probe to TP1. The internal counter keeps changing its frequency while the external counter shows stable reading, so it seems that the issue is actually with the internal FCTR. Also, I cannot match the external and internal reading by turning C22. It is way off. Any idea? I was following the instruction from the link below; http://www.w3fpr.com/step_1.html Thanks, Chris AD1AD From donwilh at embarqmail.com Thu Apr 18 18:56:03 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:56:03 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 CAL FCTR problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Chris, Is the K2 CAL FCTR reading steady when you measure TP3 with the internal probe? If not, there is something wrong with either the internal probe or with Q9 and Q10 on the control board. Replace CB Q9 and Q10 with PN2222 transistors and see if that corrects the reading. Once you have a steady reading, you can proceed - but not before. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/18/2019 6:42 PM, Chris wrote: > Hi all, > > I have a K2/100 and a K2/10. I noticed that K2/100 is having an issue with > the frequency calibration, so I decided to fix it today. > > When I set the band to 10m and connect my external GPSDO frequency counter > and the FCTR probe to TP1. The internal counter keeps changing its > frequency while the external counter shows stable reading, so it seems that > the issue is actually with the internal FCTR. Also, I cannot match the > external and internal reading by turning C22. It is way off. > From eric at elecraft.com Thu Apr 18 19:15:53 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:15:53 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] P3 Display issues... In-Reply-To: <002101d4f5f3$92ce7910$b86b6b30$@qsl.net> References: <002101d4f5f3$92ce7910$b86b6b30$@qsl.net> Message-ID: <339210b8-d986-bd85-65f2-0b6089d3a1e7@elecraft.com> Hi Robin, Make sure you have the P3 and K3 connected via the 9 pin RS232 cable, and that both are at the same baud rate mentioned the manual. Also, in the P3 menu there is an entry for radio type. Select K3 if it is not already entered. 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 4/18/2019 7:32 AM, oz6abm at qsl.net wrote: > Hi - > > > > I just cannot get this to work for me. I am looking at my P3 connected to a K3. It is connected between the IF In on the P3 and IF Out on the K3. When looking at the P3 display, on all frequencies, I do not see the actual frequency of the VFO, I see 0, for example to top line has -25.0 0 +25.0. > > > > On top of that, when I use marker A and move it and press the QSY, nothing happens. What am I doing wrong. The User Guide just says how it should work, but not why it is displaying 0 as center frequency? > > > > Thanks, > > Robin > > OZ6ABM/5P5R > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From kl7uw at acsalaska.net Thu Apr 18 19:40:37 2019 From: kl7uw at acsalaska.net (Edward R Cole) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 15:40:37 -0800 Subject: [Elecraft] RCA Connectors i.e Phono Plugs Message-ID: <201904182340.x3INedmk020677@mail41c28.carrierzone.com> I'm an old ham (60+ years as a ham): Originally called RCA and Phono connectors (I still refer to them as that). Back of my K3 has a couple. My brand-new, cutting edge, made-for-ham radio, super, A/D convertor* has four of them to take two IQ baseband inputs from two SDR's to convert to digital via USB2 port on a computer. Its replacing my old M-Audio Delta44 soundcard (which had four 1/4-inch mono phone plug inputs). I bought four 3.5mm mini-phone plug to RCA/Phono male connector audio cables (6-foot) from Amazon to accommodate connecting the A/D to my two LP-Pan's which are connected to main and sub-Rx IF's of my K3. *UADC4 http://www.linkrf.ch/UADC4.html 73, Ed - KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com Dubus-NA Business mail: dubususa at gmail.com From n1al at sonic.net Thu Apr 18 21:23:43 2019 From: n1al at sonic.net (Alan) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:23:43 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] RCA Connectors i.e Phono Plugs In-Reply-To: <90c35735-a5d7-5986-ab80-f3826237b68f@foothill.net> References: <90c35735-a5d7-5986-ab80-f3826237b68f@foothill.net> Message-ID: <4e29de19-3447-3a61-c9e4-b6b008f8e1cc@sonic.net> From Wikipedia: "An *RCA connector*, sometimes called a *phono connector* or (in other languages) *Cinch connector*, is a type of electrical connector commonly used to carry audio and video signals." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RCA_connector It was news to me that an RCA phono connector is also known as a "Cinch connector".? I think you're right that it must be a name used in Europe. Alan N1AL On 4/18/19 1:30 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: > The Nanokeyer is the creation of Oscar, DJ0MY.? It's possible that the > RCA Phono connector is called a "Cinch" connector in EU or DL, but in > the US [and I believe Canada], it is quite distinct from the > "Cinch-Jones" connectors, which I find are still available from the > several sources I checked. > > 73, > Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW > Sparks NV DM09dn > Washoe County > > On 4/18/2019 1:08 PM, Gwen Patton wrote: >> I just built a Nanokeyer last night, and the connections for keyer >> and PTT >> are both RCA jacks. However, in the documentation, they are referred >> to as >> "cinch connectors". When cataloging the parts prior to building, I >> had to >> look in the construction pictures to verify what kind of connector was a >> "cinch" connector. I was rather surprised to see that RCA connectors >> have a >> different name now, but RCA hasn't been a thing for a long time now so I >> guess it was inevitable, seeing as it is listed as having gone >> defunct in >> 1986. ... From n4zr at comcast.net Thu Apr 18 21:27:13 2019 From: n4zr at comcast.net (N4ZR) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 21:27:13 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 F/W ver 2.17 now available In-Reply-To: <451CAB5FBE47439494BDB38C56906613@ROYKOEPPEHP> References: <451CAB5FBE47439494BDB38C56906613@ROYKOEPPEHP> Message-ID: <84fb7500-beec-cb6a-213c-3dbcde953932@comcast.net> OK, I give up. My KPA-1500 Utility says that I have 2.00, and also that that's the latest.? Where would I find 2.17? 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at , now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spots, please use your favorite "retail" DX cluster. On 4/16/2019 4:38 PM, Roy Koeppe wrote: > K4WJ alerted me that you can access ver 2.17 on your Utility. Went > right in! > > 73,?? Roy???? K6XK > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From dick at elecraft.com Thu Apr 18 21:33:57 2019 From: dick at elecraft.com (Dick Dievendorff) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 18:33:57 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 F/W ver 2.17 now available In-Reply-To: <84fb7500-beec-cb6a-213c-3dbcde953932@comcast.net> References: <451CAB5FBE47439494BDB38C56906613@ROYKOEPPEHP> <84fb7500-beec-cb6a-213c-3dbcde953932@comcast.net> Message-ID: <2D9D8167-BCCC-4AF7-8943-02557DA0D379@elecraft.com> Click ?Copy New Files from Elecraft? 2.17 files are available at ftp://ftp.elecraft.com/KPA1500/firmware 73 de Dick, K6KR > On Apr 18, 2019, at 18:27, N4ZR wrote: > > OK, I give up. My KPA-1500 Utility says that I have 2.00, and also that that's the latest. Where would I find 2.17? > > 73, Pete N4ZR > Check out the Reverse Beacon Network > at , now > spotting RTTY activity worldwide. > For spots, please use your favorite > "retail" DX cluster. > >> On 4/16/2019 4:38 PM, Roy Koeppe wrote: >> K4WJ alerted me that you can access ver 2.17 on your Utility. Went right in! >> >> 73, Roy K6XK >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From hs0zed at gmail.com Thu Apr 18 22:59:05 2019 From: hs0zed at gmail.com (Martin Sole) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:59:05 +0700 Subject: [Elecraft] RCA Connectors i.e Phono Plugs In-Reply-To: <4e29de19-3447-3a61-c9e4-b6b008f8e1cc@sonic.net> References: <90c35735-a5d7-5986-ab80-f3826237b68f@foothill.net> <4e29de19-3447-3a61-c9e4-b6b008f8e1cc@sonic.net> Message-ID: <635aa3e5-1275-8a33-ba96-11107f4e1a04@gmail.com> Never were in UK to my knowledge, we always called them phono plugs and sockets. Jones connectors were always the black cased multi pin connectors with rectangular blades, usually some at right angles to others. Think FT101 power connector. I think Cinch was a manufacturer of Jones connectors at one time. Cinch belongs to Belfuse now I think and they still make a lot of military grade connectors, not Jones connectors though I suspect. Here's an interesting history of the Jones connector found in a mail back in 2012 on the Gearslutz web board. https://www.gearslutz.com/board/geekslutz-forum/673980-cinch-jones-connector-whats-deal.html Martin, HS0ZED Hi. I'm not sure how i found this web site, but let me try to answer the question. My grandfather invented the first Jones Plug . I believe it was in the early 1930's. His name was Howard Bevan Jones. He also manufactured lots of different kinds of Jones plugs, with a company based in Chicago that bears his name. At the height of the company's existence, it had about 200 employees. the early catalogs have LOTS of Jones Plugs. At some point, Howard B. Jones and Co. was bought by Cinch Manufacturing. For a number of years, the plugs were still called Jones Plugs, but later on they were sold as Cinch Jones Plugs. I , and others in my family, have old catalogs, photos of the whole group of company employees, and lots of other memorabilia. My uncle, Howard's son-in-law, tells tales of driving all over the Midwest to sell them. Very entertaining. this uncle died at age 100 a few years ago. I have tried in vain to find out a lot more. Cinch Mfg. was no help. Even the family was quiet about what actually transpired in the early days. Family lore has it that Howard also invented, and his company manufactured, a device in slot machines that allowed the owners of the machines ( casino owners, presumably) to adjust the odds of winning. You can extrapolate whatever conclusions you find interesting from this information. Howard also invented the child's toy called the Hootnanny. It was widely used, and is available from time to time on eBay . I could go on further, but perhaps this answers your question. I will be interested if any other comments arise. Michael Bevan Jones On 19/04/2019 08:23, Alan wrote: > From Wikipedia: > > "An *RCA connector*, sometimes called a *phono connector* or (in other > languages) *Cinch connector*, is a type of electrical connector > commonly used to carry audio and video signals." > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RCA_connector > > It was news to me that an RCA phono connector is also known as a > "Cinch connector".? I think you're right that it must be a name used > in Europe. > > Alan N1AL > > > On 4/18/19 1:30 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: >> The Nanokeyer is the creation of Oscar, DJ0MY.? It's possible that >> the RCA Phono connector is called a "Cinch" connector in EU or DL, >> but in the US [and I believe Canada], it is quite distinct from the >> "Cinch-Jones" connectors, which I find are still available from the >> several sources I checked. >> >> 73, >> Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW >> Sparks NV DM09dn >> Washoe County >> >> On 4/18/2019 1:08 PM, Gwen Patton wrote: >>> I just built a Nanokeyer last night, and the connections for keyer >>> and PTT >>> are both RCA jacks. However, in the documentation, they are referred >>> to as >>> "cinch connectors". When cataloging the parts prior to building, I >>> had to >>> look in the construction pictures to verify what kind of connector >>> was a >>> "cinch" connector. I was rather surprised to see that RCA connectors >>> have a >>> different name now, but RCA hasn't been a thing for a long time now >>> so I >>> guess it was inevitable, seeing as it is listed as having gone >>> defunct in >>> 1986. > ... > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From gordon.lapoint at gmail.com Fri Apr 19 06:00:56 2019 From: gordon.lapoint at gmail.com (Gordon LaPoint) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 06:00:56 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 Tilt stand Message-ID: <8f1c8fb2-fa6e-499b-e241-976865ed85f2@gmail.com> Is there a shorter K2 tilt stand available??? I would like one that is about 1/2 as high as the standard one.? Its too low with the stand folded and too high with it up. Thanks, Gordon - N1MGO From donwilh at embarqmail.com Fri Apr 19 07:55:02 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 07:55:02 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 Tilt stand In-Reply-To: <8f1c8fb2-fa6e-499b-e241-976865ed85f2@gmail.com> References: <8f1c8fb2-fa6e-499b-e241-976865ed85f2@gmail.com> Message-ID: <2eed8213-7cb1-208d-920c-c37ebdf3b690@embarqmail.com> Gordon, Yes, it is ETS2. Go to the Elecraft website Quick Order, then open Classic Transceivers and K2 Accessoriesl and cliick on ETS15. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/19/2019 6:00 AM, Gordon LaPoint wrote: > Is there a shorter K2 tilt stand available??? I would like one that is > about 1/2 as high as the standard one.? Its too low with the stand > folded and too high with it up. From benton-webb at hotmail.com Fri Apr 19 08:44:54 2019 From: benton-webb at hotmail.com (Paul Webb) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 12:44:54 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Selling K2 SN 7629, $400, off list, Paul K5HKX Message-ID: From herr42 at comcast.net Fri Apr 19 09:50:10 2019 From: herr42 at comcast.net (Jeff Herr) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 06:50:10 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] will the Beep ever be silenced? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <001601d4f6b6$cebed280$6c3c7780$@net> recap: while using the freq utility with kx3: every time you QSY there is a beep. a beep in the headphones a beep I cannot silence -----Original Message----- From: Wayne Burdick [mailto:n6kr at elecraft.com] Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2017 08:19 AM To: herr42 Cc: Ron D'Eau Claire; Elecraft Reflector Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Beep This is definitely on the KX3/KX2 firmware task list. Wayne N6KR > On Nov 16, 2017, at 3:24 AM, herr42 wrote: > > Nope > > > > Sent from my Verizon 4G LTE smartphone > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Ron D'Eau Claire > Date: 11/15/17 8:09 PM (GMT-08:00) > To: 'Jeff Herr' , 'Wayne Burdick' > Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: RE: [Elecraft] Beep > > SW TONE won't silence it? > > From page 65 of the KX3 Owner's manual: > > '... Switch press tones are enabled by default. Using the > SW TONE menu entry, you can turn tones OFF, > ON,..." > > 73, Ron AC7AC From gordon.lapoint at gmail.com Fri Apr 19 10:56:16 2019 From: gordon.lapoint at gmail.com (Gordon LaPoint) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:56:16 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 Tilt stand In-Reply-To: <2eed8213-7cb1-208d-920c-c37ebdf3b690@embarqmail.com> References: <8f1c8fb2-fa6e-499b-e241-976865ed85f2@gmail.com> <2eed8213-7cb1-208d-920c-c37ebdf3b690@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <3d963bc7-e96f-994b-87e6-fc62c31ff544@gmail.com> Don, ??? Thanks!?? Just what I needed, I put one on order. 73, Gordon - N1MGO On 4/19/2019 7:55 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > Gordon, > > Yes, it is ETS2. > Go to the Elecraft website Quick Order, then open Classic Transceivers > and K2 Accessoriesl and cliick on ETS15. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/19/2019 6:00 AM, Gordon LaPoint wrote: >> Is there a shorter K2 tilt stand available??? I would like one that >> is about 1/2 as high as the standard one.? Its too low with the stand >> folded and too high with it up. From donwilh at embarqmail.com Fri Apr 19 11:20:35 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:20:35 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 Tilt stand In-Reply-To: <3d963bc7-e96f-994b-87e6-fc62c31ff544@gmail.com> References: <8f1c8fb2-fa6e-499b-e241-976865ed85f2@gmail.com> <2eed8213-7cb1-208d-920c-c37ebdf3b690@embarqmail.com> <3d963bc7-e96f-994b-87e6-fc62c31ff544@gmail.com> Message-ID: <8a9c37ac-d185-bb61-b481-187424b0e633@embarqmail.com> Sorry for the typo in the first line - the ETS2 is the standard 3 inch tilt stand, the ETS15 is the 1.5 inch short tilt stand. It is normally used with the KAT100 when the K2 is stacked on top of the KAT100, but it can be used in other configurations as well - owner's choice. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/19/2019 10:56 AM, Gordon LaPoint wrote: > Don, > ??? Thanks!?? Just what I needed, I put one on order. > 73, > Gordon - N1MGO > > On 4/19/2019 7:55 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote: >> Gordon, >> >> Yes, it is ETS2. >> Go to the Elecraft website Quick Order, then open Classic >> Transceivers and K2 Accessoriesl and cliick on ETS15. >> >> 73, >> Don W3FPR >> From doug at kj0f.com Fri Apr 19 12:53:27 2019 From: doug at kj0f.com (Doug Person) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:53:27 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] FS: Unfinished K1 In-Reply-To: <602f29e9-02c3-99ec-7199-c82af8016498@kj0f.com> References: <602f29e9-02c3-99ec-7199-c82af8016498@kj0f.com> Message-ID: <74e35e42-9af4-b247-4e1d-1a8b096fd325@kj0f.com> Thanks for everyone's interest in the K1. It has been sold. tnx & 73, Doug -- KJ0F On 4/18/2019 11:55 AM, Doug Person wrote: > I have an unfinished K1 for sale. It's about 80% done. I am unable to > finish it. 40/20 filter board. > > Email direct for questions. > > $300 shipped CONUS. > -- 73 de Doug -- KJ0F From k6dgw at foothill.net Fri Apr 19 14:28:44 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:28:44 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Cinch Jones Connectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Because they are not locking and will separate if pulled, on more than once occasion while I was snarfing around behind the desk and got my foot tangled up in all the "wireless" down there, I did not pull the TX off the desk. [:-) 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/18/2019 2:28 PM, Phil Kane wrote: > I like them because I can get my arthritic hands around them and in > thedays when a soldering iron was not a "weapon of mass destruction" > in myhands they were so easy to solder wires to.-- > 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 > > From dave.scarfe at gmail.com Fri Apr 19 15:11:17 2019 From: dave.scarfe at gmail.com (Dave Scarfe) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 13:11:17 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] K3s for sale Message-ID: For sale, a mint Elecraft K3s/100 built just over a year ago. Radio includes a KFL3C-400 and neoprene soft grip for the VFO control. Asking $2300.00 USD shipped. 73, Dave VE5UO From gkidder at ilstu.edu Fri Apr 19 16:13:43 2019 From: gkidder at ilstu.edu (Kidder, George) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 20:13:43 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Cinch Jones Connectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <2adf3d7d-50f5-c489-e7a1-1bde9645dcd8@ilstu.edu> If I remember rightly (and it's been a LONG time) there was an outer shell pair made for at least some sizes which locked together external to the shell.? Even without the lock, the multi-pin models (especially in the larger sizes) took some umph to get them apart. George, W3HBM Bar Harbor, ME On 4/19/2019 2:28 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: > [This message came from an external source. If suspicious, report to > abuse at ilstu.edu] > > Because they are not locking and will separate if pulled, on more than > once occasion while I was snarfing around behind the desk and got my > foot tangled up in all the "wireless" down there, I did not pull the TX > off the desk. [:-) > > 73, > Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW > Sparks NV DM09dn > Washoe County > > On 4/18/2019 2:28 PM, Phil Kane wrote: >> I like them because I can get my arthritic hands around them and in >> thedays when a soldering iron was not a "weapon of mass destruction" >> in myhands they were so easy to solder wires to.-- >> 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 >> >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From pincon at erols.com Fri Apr 19 17:24:39 2019 From: pincon at erols.com (Charlie T) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:24:39 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Cinch Jones Connectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <005701d4f6f6$4f8ceb10$eea6c130$@erols.com> There is an easy locking device that can be added to any Cinch-Jones connector. The ones used on the older Yaesu radios had this device included. You would have to practically destroy the chassis to get them apart if you didn't squeeze it properly to dis-engage the lock. Much tighter and higher current rating than those Anderson power poles everyone seems to have fallen for. 73, Charlie k3ICH -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Fred Jensen Sent: Friday, April 19, 2019 2:29 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Cinch Jones Connectors Because they are not locking and will separate if pulled, on more than once occasion while I was snarfing around behind the desk and got my foot tangled up in all the "wireless" down there, I did not pull the TX off the desk. [:-) 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/18/2019 2:28 PM, Phil Kane wrote: > I like them because I can get my arthritic hands around them and in > thedays when a soldering iron was not a "weapon of mass destruction" > in myhands they were so easy to solder wires to.-- > 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From wes_n7ws at triconet.org Fri Apr 19 19:53:09 2019 From: wes_n7ws at triconet.org (Wes) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 16:53:09 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Cinch Jones Connectors In-Reply-To: <2adf3d7d-50f5-c489-e7a1-1bde9645dcd8@ilstu.edu> References: <2adf3d7d-50f5-c489-e7a1-1bde9645dcd8@ilstu.edu> Message-ID: <9759767e-2898-93ae-3dbe-a1b79c0c5f76@triconet.org> You remember correctly.? And they can require a tussle to separate on the bigger sizes. Wes? N7WS On 4/19/2019 1:13 PM, Kidder, George wrote: > If I remember rightly (and it's been a LONG time) there was an outer > shell pair made for at least some sizes which locked together external > to the shell.? Even without the lock, the multi-pin models (especially > in the larger sizes) took some umph to get them apart. > > George, W3HBM > From eric at elecraft.com Fri Apr 19 20:21:00 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2019 17:21:00 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Cinch Jones Connectors In-Reply-To: <005701d4f6f6$4f8ceb10$eea6c130$@erols.com> References: <005701d4f6f6$4f8ceb10$eea6c130$@erols.com> Message-ID: <93cb5e6e-4fbd-f3ab-2ba2-2c9d751691ed@elecraft.com> In the interest of reliving email overload for others, let's wind this OT thread down now as its past 11 posts. In general, please self moderate when getting up past 5 to 6 posts on OT discussions. 73, Eric Moderator, I think.. ;-) /elecraft.com/ On 4/19/2019 2:24 PM, Charlie T wrote: > There is an easy locking device that can be added to any Cinch-Jones > connector. > From mark.yergin at gmail.com Sun Apr 21 08:54:22 2019 From: mark.yergin at gmail.com (Mark Yergin) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 08:54:22 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 Resistance Check Message-ID: I'm on the Page 62 Resistance Check and R115 / 12V IIN check should be >500 ohms and I'm getting 132 ohms. All other checks in the table are fine. Before I move on to Alignment and Test Part 2, I want to get some feedback on this discrepancy. Move on? Or what does this indicate I should be checking? Mark W8EWH From mark.yergin at gmail.com Sun Apr 21 09:06:51 2019 From: mark.yergin at gmail.com (Mark Yergin) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 09:06:51 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 Resistance Check In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: OK - I check this again after moving the board off my antistatic mat and onto the manual, and power cycling the multimeter, and how I'm getting 3.6k ohms at this point. So all OK. Not sure what this issue was that moving the board or power cycling the MM solved. Mark W8EWH On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 8:54 AM Mark Yergin wrote: > I'm on the Page 62 Resistance Check and R115 / 12V IIN check should be > >500 ohms and I'm getting 132 ohms. All other checks in the table are fine. > > Before I move on to Alignment and Test Part 2, I want to get some feedback > on this discrepancy. Move on? Or what does this indicate I should be > checking? > > Mark W8EWH > From mark.yergin at gmail.com Sun Apr 21 11:30:04 2019 From: mark.yergin at gmail.com (Mark Yergin) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 11:30:04 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 4 MHz Oscillator Cal Message-ID: I found that when both my external FC probe and the probe provided by the kit were attached to TP3 the K2 frequency reading was lowered significantly (~12070 from about 12098) vs when measured separately. C22 could not make a match. Separately the two measurements were fairly close, and I could use C22 to make them the same using the hold feature on my external FC to capture it's reading, and adjusting C22 to match it on the K2 with only the kit probe attached. Is this OK? The manual talks about having both connected at the same time, but the interaction of the two was an issue for me. Mark W8EWH From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sun Apr 21 11:37:46 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 11:37:46 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 4 MHz Oscillator Cal In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <796a2374-9635-5cf7-efe2-cccc177c2858@embarqmail.com> Mark, What kind of probe are you using on your external frequency counter? You should be using a 10x probe like you would use on an oscilloscope to keep the loading of the circuit by the probe capacity to a minimum. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/21/2019 11:30 AM, Mark Yergin wrote: > I found that when both my external FC probe and the probe provided by the > kit were attached to TP3 the K2 frequency reading was lowered significantly > (~12070 from about 12098) vs when measured separately. C22 could not make > a match. Separately the two measurements were fairly close, and I could > use C22 to make them the same using the hold feature on my external FC to > capture it's reading, and adjusting C22 to match it on the K2 with only the > kit probe attached. Is this OK? The manual talks about having both > connected at the same time, but the interaction of the two was an issue for > me. > From kevinr at coho.net Sun Apr 21 12:26:50 2019 From: kevinr at coho.net (kevinr) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 09:26:50 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Announcement Message-ID: <4d554308-7cfd-18ea-e16f-f2699b216d8e@coho.net> Good Morning, ?? Last week's sunspot is passing over the limb of the sun.? The rest of the surface is blank.? But twenty meters has a roaring sound to it.? Even though the CME thrown by the spot was not aimed at us there are still a few effects from it.? There are a few contests going on but nothing major; we'll find an opening. Please join us on: 14050 kHz at 2200z Sunday (3 PM PDT Sunday) ?7047 kHz at 0000z Monday (5 PM PDT Sunday) 73, Kevin. KD5ONS _ From sdvangen at earthlink.net Sun Apr 21 12:51:14 2019 From: sdvangen at earthlink.net (SVangen) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 09:51:14 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft W2 VHF/UHF Coupler use with 12VDC preamps Message-ID: <1555865474358-0.post@n2.nabble.com> It appears from the schematic that the Elecraft 144-450 MHz Directional Coupler for the W2 SWR/Power Meter can safely pass DC voltage without any direct interface nor danger of damage with the sensor electronics. My question, has anyone confirmed that the VHF/UHF couplers are safe to use with 12VDC in-line coax powered preamps (i.e. Icom AG-25/35 preamps with an Icom IC-9100 Sat Transceiver). Thank you, Scott Vangen WB0QMZ -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From kk2l at comcast.net Sun Apr 21 12:53:55 2019 From: kk2l at comcast.net (KK2L) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 09:53:55 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] CIRRO MAZZONI BABY LOOP ANTENNA Message-ID: <1555865635222-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Good Afternoon All,I have a Cirro Mazzoni Baby loop antenna and would like to take advantage of the RS232 module with my KX3. Of course, I have no problem with this interface using my K3. But I was wondering how one would go about creating a RS232 interface using the KX3. Would a simple RS232 DB9 9 Pin Female to USB 2.0 PLC Serial Straight-through Cable work with the KX3? It seems so but I can't figure out how to get from the USB end of that cable to the ACC input. Am I looking at this the right way?ThanksMarkKK2L ----- Mark KK2L -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From mark.yergin at gmail.com Sun Apr 21 13:07:41 2019 From: mark.yergin at gmail.com (Mark Yergin) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 13:07:41 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 4 MHz Oscillator Cal In-Reply-To: <796a2374-9635-5cf7-efe2-cccc177c2858@embarqmail.com> References: <796a2374-9635-5cf7-efe2-cccc177c2858@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: BNC with mini test clips. I can switch in 10x (or 1x) on the FC but that doesn't make any difference. FC is a BK Precision 1823A. Mark On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 11:37 AM Don Wilhelm wrote: > Mark, > > What kind of probe are you using on your external frequency counter? > You should be using a 10x probe like you would use on an oscilloscope to > keep the loading of the circuit by the probe capacity to a minimum. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/21/2019 11:30 AM, Mark Yergin wrote: > > I found that when both my external FC probe and the probe provided by the > > kit were attached to TP3 the K2 frequency reading was lowered > significantly > > (~12070 from about 12098) vs when measured separately. C22 could not > make > > a match. Separately the two measurements were fairly close, and I could > > use C22 to make them the same using the hold feature on my external FC to > > capture it's reading, and adjusting C22 to match it on the K2 with only > the > > kit probe attached. Is this OK? The manual talks about having both > > connected at the same time, but the interaction of the two was an issue > for > > me. > > > From mark.yergin at gmail.com Sun Apr 21 13:43:45 2019 From: mark.yergin at gmail.com (Mark Yergin) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 13:43:45 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 VCO Alignment - Low voltage Message-ID: I'm getting 0.02 V at R30, not 6V. Turns on T5 correct and wound per image. Reflowed the four solder joints and verified continuity between 1 and 2, 3 and 4. C72 is correct value (label 271) and reflowed. L30 is the correct value (large slot), and reflowed. D21-26 confirmed as correct values. C71-74 confirmed as correct values. Suggestions? Mark W8EWH From kl7uw at acsalaska.net Sun Apr 21 13:51:25 2019 From: kl7uw at acsalaska.net (Edward R Cole) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 09:51:25 -0800 Subject: [Elecraft] RCA Connectors i.e Phono Plugs Message-ID: <201904211751.x3LHpTbF021343@mail46c28.carrierzone.com> Cinch-Jones always referred to square black connectors with large "blade" pins. They were used a lot with early ham amplifiers and until recently in Ham-series rotator controllers; now they come with 9-pin round connectors populated with 8-pins which one crimps onto rotator wire and inserts (like a Molex connector). One has to have special removal tool to pull the pins. I recently bought a Ham-IV and T2X rotator with those used at the rotator. Control box still uses Cinch-Jones 8-pin. Older Ham rotators sold by Hygain (and CDE) had simple screw strips. I bought one of W6PQL 2m kilowatt amps and it came with a 12-pin Cinch-Jones, which is great since the amp draws 40A at 50v thru the pins. I paralleled two pins to be sure to handle current. Other pins carry 12v for control board and several lines for remote monitoring/control. I can still find them in internet searches (usually Amazon companies). Internet search shows pictures: https://www.bing.com/images/search?q=cinch-jones+connector&qpvt=cinch-jones+connector&form=IGRE&first=1&cw=1129&ch=508 You will note some pictures show RCA-phono types with Cinch name. Interesting history given in recent link. Other "old" connectors used in ham radios were Octal Plugs (on many Heathkits) and 4-pin mic connectors. These days one finds computer type connectors in use. 73, Ed - KL7UW http://www.kl7uw.com Dubus-NA Business mail: dubususa at gmail.com From kf7gc at yahoo.com Sun Apr 21 14:15:06 2019 From: kf7gc at yahoo.com (Tomy Ivan) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 18:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 References: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> Does anyone know how to hook up the proper cable,?, to run an SDR like HDSDR on the KX3 withthe PX3 also hooked up. We are also using the KXPA100 amp. I know the end that fits in the IO R on the PX3 is a 2.5 mm? can I use on the other end a USB A.Where might I find this cable??I only have USB connections on my Asus Laptop. 73! Tomy KF7GC AZ STM, A1-Operator NM AZ Section Net, ORS,?www.atenaz.net From jimk0xu at gmail.com Sun Apr 21 15:04:28 2019 From: jimk0xu at gmail.com (Jim Rhodes) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 14:04:28 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 In-Reply-To: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> References: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: When using the KXPA100 amp with the KX3 the control is via the amp. USB to 3.5 cable plugs into the amp and feeds through to the KX3. No computer to KX3 cable is needed, just computer to KXPA100. Same cable you would use on barefoot KX3. Jim Rhodes K0XU From k8mn at frontiernet.net Sun Apr 21 15:53:48 2019 From: k8mn at frontiernet.net (Dave Heil) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 20:53:48 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] Cinch Jones Connectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: There used to be (and there may still be) in the Cinch line, locking Jones connectors with steel tabs on each side with released when you squeezed them. 73, Dave Heil K8MN On 19-Apr-19 19:28, Fred Jensen wrote: > Because they are not locking and will separate if pulled, on more than > once occasion while I was snarfing around behind the desk and got my > foot tangled up in all the "wireless" down there, I did not pull the > TX off the desk. [:-) > > 73, > Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW > Sparks NV DM09dn > Washoe County > > On 4/18/2019 2:28 PM, Phil Kane wrote: >> I like them because I can get my arthritic hands around them and in >> thedays when a soldering iron was not a "weapon of mass destruction" >> in myhands they were so easy to solder wires to.-- >> 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 >> >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From marklgoldberg at gmail.com Sun Apr 21 16:43:08 2019 From: marklgoldberg at gmail.com (Mark Goldberg) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 13:43:08 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 In-Reply-To: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> References: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: The I/Q feeds through the PX3. You need to take the I/Q out of the PX3 and send it to a high quality sound card, usually a USB sound card. If you want wideband, choose a 192 kHz card from here: http://www.telepostinc.com/soundcards.html I use a U7. The rig control also feeds through the PX3 and the amp to USB on your computer. 73, Mark On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 11:15 AM Tomy Ivan via Elecraft < elecraft at mailman.qth.net> wrote: > Does anyone know how to hook up the proper cable,?, to run an SDR like > HDSDR on the KX3 withthe PX3 also hooked up. We are also using the KXPA100 > amp. > I know the end that fits in the IO R on the PX3 is a 2.5 mm can I use on > the other end a USB A.Where might I find this cable? I only have USB > connections on my Asus Laptop. > 73! Tomy KF7GC > AZ STM, A1-Operator > NM AZ Section Net, > ORS, www.atenaz.net > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From marklgoldberg at gmail.com Sun Apr 21 16:44:11 2019 From: marklgoldberg at gmail.com (Mark Goldberg) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 13:44:11 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 In-Reply-To: References: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Forgot to include my call. 73, Mark W7MLG From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sun Apr 21 17:47:58 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 17:47:58 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 4 MHz Oscillator Cal In-Reply-To: References: <796a2374-9635-5cf7-efe2-cccc177c2858@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <416d3214-5905-cc7a-66e1-5f656f923739@embarqmail.com> Mark, I am not talking about the 10x/1x sensitivity scaling of your frequency counter itself. I am referring to the capacitance of the probe itself.? You should be using a 10x 'scope probe which has a low capacity and will not load the PLL Reference circuit. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/21/2019 1:07 PM, Mark Yergin wrote: > BNC with mini test clips.? I can switch in 10x (or 1x) on the FC but > that doesn't make any difference. > > FC is a BK Precision 1823A. > > From eric at elecraft.com Sun Apr 21 17:54:01 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz WA6HHQ - Elecraft) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 14:54:01 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Cinch Jones Connectors In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Folks - thread has been closed previously. 73, Eric Moderator elecraft.com --- Sent from my iPhone 6S > On Apr 21, 2019, at 12:53 PM, Dave Heil wrote: > > There used to be (and there may still be) in the Cinch line, locking Jones connectors with steel tabs on each side with released when you squeezed them. > > 73, > > Dave Heil K8MN > >> On 19-Apr-19 19:28, Fred Jensen wrote: >> Because they are not locking and will separate if pulled, on more than once occasion while I was snarfing around behind the desk and got my foot tangled up in all the "wireless" down there, I did not pull the TX off the desk. [:-) >> >> 73, >> Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW >> Sparks NV DM09dn >> Washoe County >> >>> On 4/18/2019 2:28 PM, Phil Kane wrote: >>> I like them because I can get my arthritic hands around them and in thedays when a soldering iron was not a "weapon of mass destruction" in myhands they were so easy to solder wires to.-- >>> 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 >>> >>> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. > https://www.avg.com > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From indians at xsmail.com Sun Apr 21 17:57:56 2019 From: indians at xsmail.com (Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 14:57:56 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] K1 manual revisions In-Reply-To: References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <1555420624328-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <286029a9-52f5-93f4-f4f4-a61c36a20a34@embarqmail.com> <0c73227e-199d-0435-e5ed-c0ebbfc76fba@bell.net> Message-ID: <1555883876520-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Hi Don and Bert, as I noticed this evening > troubleshooting nor alignment parts are not same in the different Rev. of K1 manuals. Our sick K1 is also from 2000... RF board Rev. D, 2000 so I am using the manual Revision D, Dec 1, 2000. Unfortunately when I measured the resistances on page 45 (J7, J8 test points) I found the J7 pin 6 has 5.6kOhms to GND but table on page 45 says it should be >100k. What makes me confusing is that when I opened the later manual Revision F, January 24, 2002 I found that in the same table on page 45 the value of J7 pin 6 should be 5-7kOhms which souns ok compare to my measured value 5.6kOhms... ?! Don can you let me know some hints what it could means in that case please? The rest values are same in both tables and measured values are also corresponding to it. Bert I will send you the proper manual for your K1 (we have same Rev. ) > Revision D, Dec 1, 2000 by email. I got it from Don (many thanks Don!!) Thanks for help in advance. 73 Petr ----- 73 - Petr, OK1RP "Apple & Elecraft freak" B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com MeWe: https://bit.ly/2HGPoDx MeWe: https://bit.ly/2FmwvDt -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From ab2tc at arrl.net Sun Apr 21 17:58:49 2019 From: ab2tc at arrl.net (ab2tc) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 14:58:49 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 In-Reply-To: References: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1555883929118-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Hi, Chose instead the U5. It is slightly less money and is just lacking a bunch of fancy audio features that have no use in a panadapter. Also all the cables come out on one side which makes for neater cabling. I believe Asus has overcome its early failure problem(s). I have had mine for at least two years and no failures have been posted her for a long time. AB2TC - Knut Mark Goldberg wrote > The I/Q feeds through the PX3. You need to take the I/Q out of the PX3 and > send it to a high quality sound card, usually a USB sound card. > > If you want wideband, choose a 192 kHz card from here: > > http://www.telepostinc.com/soundcards.html > > I use a U7. > > The rig control also feeds through the PX3 and the amp to USB on your > computer. > > 73, > > Mark > > > > > On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 11:15 AM Tomy Ivan via Elecraft < > -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sun Apr 21 18:02:34 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 18:02:34 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 VCO Alignment - Low voltage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Mark, First check the DC voltage on U6 pin 5. It should be near 4 volts - if not, you have a problem on the thermistor board, likely a solder bridge. Then recheck the PLL reference oscillator range at TP3 using CAL FCTR. Tell me the high and low frequencies. Then check the VFO frequency at TP1 (using CAL FCTR) when tuned to 4000kHz and again when tuned to 7100kHz. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/21/2019 1:43 PM, Mark Yergin wrote: > I'm getting 0.02 V at R30, not 6V. Turns on T5 correct and wound per > image. Reflowed the four solder joints and verified continuity between 1 > and 2, 3 and 4. C72 is correct value (label 271) and reflowed. L30 is the > correct value (large slot), and reflowed. D21-26 confirmed as correct > values. C71-74 confirmed as correct values. From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sun Apr 21 18:10:17 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 18:10:17 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] CIRRO MAZZONI BABY LOOP ANTENNA In-Reply-To: <1555865635222-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1555865635222-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Mark, You will likely have to gain access to a full RS-232 port by using a USB to serial adapter. Connect that to an RS-232 "Y" cable. One side of the "Y" connects to the RS-232 of your loop antenna, and on the other side of the "Y" connect to your KX3 using the KXSER cable from Elecraft - or alternately, build your own KXUSB using the schematic shown in the back of the Elecraft XG3 manual (download it from Elecraft). Make certain your loop controller only listens to the RS-232 communications. If there are RS-232 drivers in the controller, they must be disabled (not just turned off, but disabled by disconnecting them or disabling them by the use of Tri-State output devices. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/21/2019 12:53 PM, KK2L wrote: > Good Afternoon All,I have a Cirro Mazzoni Baby loop antenna and would like to > take advantage of the RS232 module with my KX3. Of course, I have no > problem with this interface using my K3. But I was wondering how one would > go about creating a RS232 interface using the KX3. Would a simple RS232 DB9 > 9 Pin Female to USB 2.0 PLC Serial Straight-through Cable work with the KX3? > It seems so but I can't figure out how to get from the USB end of that cable > to the ACC input. Am I looking at this the right way?ThanksMarkKK2L > > > > ----- > Mark > KK2L > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sun Apr 21 18:14:51 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 18:14:51 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 In-Reply-To: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> References: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <6061d3e4-d5ab-3277-56f0-c729d4a09829@embarqmail.com> Tomy, The KX3 to KPA100 cable assembly and the KX3 to PX3 cables are involved. The PC connects to the KXPA100 using the KXUSB cable to control not only the KXPA100, but the PX3 and the KX3 as well. In other words, the PC cable connections are "daisy-chained" From the PC to the KXPA100 first, and then to the PX3 and then on to the KX3. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/21/2019 2:15 PM, Tomy Ivan via Elecraft wrote: > Does anyone know how to hook up the proper cable,?, to run an SDR like HDSDR on the KX3 withthe PX3 also hooked up. We are also using the KXPA100 amp. > I know the end that fits in the IO R on the PX3 is a 2.5 mm? can I use on the other end a USB A.Where might I find this cable??I only have USB connections on my Asus Laptop. From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sun Apr 21 18:26:32 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 18:26:32 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K1 manual revisions In-Reply-To: <1555883876520-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <1555420624328-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <286029a9-52f5-93f4-f4f4-a61c36a20a34@embarqmail.com> <0c73227e-199d-0435-e5ed-c0ebbfc76fba@bell.net> <1555883876520-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <7c1a939b-3e5d-2653-694a-4e113c7c046e@embarqmail.com> Petr, Do you have the filter board plugged in when you read 5.6k ohms? Note in the Revision D manual, the filter board is NOT plugged in when making the resistance measurements on page 45. The filter board is not plugged in until you get to page 46. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/21/2019 5:57 PM, Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS wrote: > Hi Don and Bert, > > as I noticed this evening > troubleshooting nor alignment parts are not same > in the different Rev. of K1 manuals. > > Our sick K1 is also from 2000... RF board Rev. D, 2000 so I am using the > manual Revision D, Dec 1, 2000. > Unfortunately when I measured the resistances on page 45 (J7, J8 test > points) I found the J7 pin 6 has 5.6kOhms to GND but table on page 45 says > it should be >100k. > What makes me confusing is that when I opened the later manual Revision F, > January 24, 2002 I found that in the same table on page 45 the value of J7 > pin 6 should be 5-7kOhms which souns ok compare to my measured value > 5.6kOhms... ?! > From mark.yergin at gmail.com Sun Apr 21 18:27:22 2019 From: mark.yergin at gmail.com (Mark Yergin) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 18:27:22 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 VCO Alignment - Low voltage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: U6 Pin 5 = 4.1v PLL ref Osc range at TP3 = 12098.83 to 12084.95 VFO at TP1: @4000kHz = 8077.0 @7100kHz = 11288.5 Mark On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 6:02 PM Don Wilhelm wrote: > Mark, > > First check the DC voltage on U6 pin 5. It should be near 4 volts - if > not, you have a problem on the thermistor board, likely a solder bridge. > > Then recheck the PLL reference oscillator range at TP3 using CAL FCTR. > Tell me the high and low frequencies. > > Then check the VFO frequency at TP1 (using CAL FCTR) when tuned to > 4000kHz and again when tuned to 7100kHz. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/21/2019 1:43 PM, Mark Yergin wrote: > > I'm getting 0.02 V at R30, not 6V. Turns on T5 correct and wound per > > image. Reflowed the four solder joints and verified continuity between 1 > > and 2, 3 and 4. C72 is correct value (label 271) and reflowed. L30 is > the > > correct value (large slot), and reflowed. D21-26 confirmed as correct > > values. C71-74 confirmed as correct values. > From g1rpo at live.co.uk Sun Apr 21 19:07:24 2019 From: g1rpo at live.co.uk (Chris Reed) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 23:07:24 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] XV144 ATF34143 phemt equivalent Message-ID: Hi all, The ATF34143 Phemt used on the rx input is discontinued and I just wondered what the suggested replacement would be for this little gremlin. I've Just purchased a second hand XV144 and I'm not getting any variation when I adjust c1 and it looks like the 34143 has already been changed looking at the state of the solder. Any guidance would be much appreciated. ATB Chris G1rpo From mark.yergin at gmail.com Sun Apr 21 19:07:55 2019 From: mark.yergin at gmail.com (Mark Yergin) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 19:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 4 MHz Oscillator Cal In-Reply-To: <416d3214-5905-cc7a-66e1-5f656f923739@embarqmail.com> References: <796a2374-9635-5cf7-efe2-cccc177c2858@embarqmail.com> <416d3214-5905-cc7a-66e1-5f656f923739@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: Tried a 10x scope probe and that did the trick. Thank You!. Mark On Sun, Apr 21, 2019 at 5:48 PM Don Wilhelm wrote: > Mark, > > I am not talking about the 10x/1x sensitivity scaling of your frequency > counter itself. > I am referring to the capacitance of the probe itself. You should be > using a 10x 'scope probe which has a low capacity and will not load the > PLL Reference circuit. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/21/2019 1:07 PM, Mark Yergin wrote: > > BNC with mini test clips. I can switch in 10x (or 1x) on the FC but > > that doesn't make any difference. > > > > FC is a BK Precision 1823A. > > > > > > From bill at wjschmidt.com Sun Apr 21 19:32:04 2019 From: bill at wjschmidt.com (Dr. William J. Schmidt) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 18:32:04 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] XV144 ATF34143 phemt equivalent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <024101d4f89a$6ded3060$49c79120$@wjschmidt.com> I'd try a PGA-103+ as a retrofit... plenty of them around. -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Chris Reed Sent: Sunday, April 21, 2019 6:07 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] XV144 ATF34143 phemt equivalent Hi all, The ATF34143 Phemt used on the rx input is discontinued and I just wondered what the suggested replacement would be for this little gremlin. I've Just purchased a second hand XV144 and I'm not getting any variation when I adjust c1 and it looks like the 34143 has already been changed looking at the state of the solder. Any guidance would be much appreciated. ATB Chris G1rpo ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From k3bh at arrl.net Sun Apr 21 20:23:23 2019 From: k3bh at arrl.net (Jay Rutherford) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 20:23:23 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 with KXPA100 In-Reply-To: <1555883929118-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> <1555883929118-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <05f97a99-fcd2-4400-8817-6da2e1fd0504@www.fastmail.com> Greetings all, How could I use the KXPA100 amp with my K2? I don't think the K2 has a keying line, and so I wonder if the KXPA100 would automatically detect band and frequency through the built-in tuner without a keying line cable. Any info appreciated. 73 Jay K3BH From gdt at lexort.com Sun Apr 21 20:53:16 2019 From: gdt at lexort.com (Greg Troxel) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 20:53:16 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] CIRRO MAZZONI BABY LOOP ANTENNA In-Reply-To: <1555865635222-0.post@n2.nabble.com> (kk2l@comcast.net's message of "Sun, 21 Apr 2019 09:53:55 -0700 (MST)") References: <1555865635222-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: KK2L writes: > Good Afternoon All,I have a Cirro Mazzoni Baby loop antenna and would like to > take advantage of the RS232 module with my KX3. Of course, I have no > problem with this interface using my K3. But I was wondering how one would > go about creating a RS232 interface using the KX3. Would a simple RS232 DB9 > 9 Pin Female to USB 2.0 PLC Serial Straight-through Cable work with the KX3? > It seems so but I can't figure out how to get from the USB end of that cable > to the ACC input. Am I looking at this the right way?ThanksMarkKK2L Two separate comments: As I understand it the KX3 has a serial port, used for control and firmware updates, but it's a mini stereo phone plug. This is what's on the end of the KXSER and KXUSB. Be careful about "RS232" vs "TTL level serial". True RS232 has voltages from +3 to +15 (or +25, depending where you read about it) V and -3 to -15 (-25) V. What is typically used is "TTL serial", which has 0V and 5V (for a 5V system; sometimes it is 3.3V). Input circuits may or may not tolerate the higher voltages. On a RPI you should definitely be careful It appears that the Elecraft serial ports are ok with the full range possible with conforming RS232 signals on receive, but use 9V (conforming) and 0V (not conforming) on transmit. That is almost certainly ok because there is so much "TTL serial" that a robust receiver has to treat 0 V like it is -3 V. http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/KX3-ACC1-interface-logic-signal-levels-what-is-quot-official-quot-Elecraft-standard-for-this-td7563052.html From ruler55 at gmail.com Sun Apr 21 21:07:20 2019 From: ruler55 at gmail.com (Robie Elms) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 01:07:20 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 - Bar Graph Erratic Message-ID: All, My K2 has been out of service for an extended period. Today, I put it back on the air and it appears to function properly, except for the bar graph display which is erratic. When I rotate the rf gain control counter clockwise segments begin to illuminate until the 3rd is illuminated. As i continue to turn the control no more bars illuminate until I reach about the 9 o'clock position and then the remaining segments turn on. When I turn the control clockwise the segments remain lit until I reach about the 2 o'clock position and then they begin turning off. This is one of several patterns I see. Some times all the segments turn on and stay on and at other times, only the two left most ones turn on. Receiver gain seems to change in relation to the RF gain control's position. Transmitter seems to work fine, as I made about 20 CW qsos on 20 meters this afternoon. To me, the issue appears to be a in the bar graph/control circuitry. Any suggestions as to where to begin troubleshooting? Robie - AJ4F From ve3nr at bell.net Sun Apr 21 21:13:28 2019 From: ve3nr at bell.net (Bert) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 21:13:28 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K1 manual revisions In-Reply-To: <1555883876520-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <1555420624328-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <286029a9-52f5-93f4-f4f4-a61c36a20a34@embarqmail.com> <0c73227e-199d-0435-e5ed-c0ebbfc76fba@bell.net> <1555883876520-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: HI Don and Petr, Thanks for the offer Petr but Don has already been kind enough to send me the Rev. D, 2000 K1 Manual. Thanks anyway! I find it quite difficult sometimes to troubleshoot and follow the schematics. Also doing signal tracing in the receiver and transmitter is quite subjective using only an RF probe. It would be better to have some RF values p-p so you could use a oscilloscope and at the same time see the signal. This is an older radio so I don't expect Elecraft to come up with some new troubleshooting aids, but the K1 owners can share experiences and test results. I've just measured the resistance between J7-pin 6 to ground and it's 5.7K. Please keep me in the loop. Thanks to both of you. Comments from other k! owners are appreciated. Thanks! Bert VE3NR On 4/21/2019 5:57 PM, Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS wrote: > Hi Don and Bert, > > as I noticed this evening > troubleshooting nor alignment parts are not same > in the different Rev. of K1 manuals. > > Our sick K1 is also from 2000... RF board Rev. D, 2000 so I am using the > manual Revision D, Dec 1, 2000. > Unfortunately when I measured the resistances on page 45 (J7, J8 test > points) I found the J7 pin 6 has 5.6kOhms to GND but table on page 45 says > it should be >100k. > What makes me confusing is that when I opened the later manual Revision F, > January 24, 2002 I found that in the same table on page 45 the value of J7 > pin 6 should be 5-7kOhms which souns ok compare to my measured value > 5.6kOhms... ?! > > Don can you let me know some hints what it could means in that case please? > The rest values are same in both tables and measured values are also > corresponding to it. > > Bert I will send you the proper manual for your K1 (we have same Rev. ) > > Revision D, Dec 1, 2000 by email. > I got it from Don (many thanks Don!!) > > Thanks for help in advance. > > 73 Petr > > > > ----- > 73 - Petr, OK1RP > "Apple & Elecraft freak" > B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com > MeWe: https://bit.ly/2HGPoDx > MeWe: https://bit.ly/2FmwvDt > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From ve3nr at bell.net Sun Apr 21 21:14:55 2019 From: ve3nr at bell.net (Bert) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 21:14:55 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K1 manual revisions In-Reply-To: <7c1a939b-3e5d-2653-694a-4e113c7c046e@embarqmail.com> References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <1555420624328-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <286029a9-52f5-93f4-f4f4-a61c36a20a34@embarqmail.com> <0c73227e-199d-0435-e5ed-c0ebbfc76fba@bell.net> <1555883876520-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <7c1a939b-3e5d-2653-694a-4e113c7c046e@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <88d78604-8dae-2cc0-e113-42a5a0e2c422@bell.net> Don and Petr, Forgot to mention that measurement was done with filter board plugged in. 5.7K Bert VE3NR On 4/21/2019 6:26 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > Petr, > > Do you have the filter board plugged in when you read 5.6k ohms? > > Note in the Revision D manual, the filter board is NOT plugged in when > making the resistance measurements on page 45. > > The filter board is not plugged in until you get to page 46. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/21/2019 5:57 PM, Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS wrote: >> Hi Don and Bert, >> >> as I noticed this evening > troubleshooting nor alignment parts are >> not same >> in the different Rev. of K1 manuals. >> >> Our sick K1 is also from 2000... RF board Rev. D, 2000 so I am using the >> manual Revision D, Dec 1, 2000. >> Unfortunately when I measured the resistances on page 45 (J7, J8 test >> points) I found the J7 pin 6 has 5.6kOhms to GND but table on page 45 >> says >> it should be >100k. >> What makes me confusing is that when I opened the later manual >> Revision F, >> January 24, 2002 I found that in the same table on page 45 the value >> of J7 >> pin 6 should be 5-7kOhms which souns ok compare to my measured value >> 5.6kOhms... ?! >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sun Apr 21 21:32:55 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 21:32:55 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K1 manual revisions In-Reply-To: References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <1555420624328-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <286029a9-52f5-93f4-f4f4-a61c36a20a34@embarqmail.com> <0c73227e-199d-0435-e5ed-c0ebbfc76fba@bell.net> <1555883876520-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Bert, Multiply the RF Voltages listed for the RF Probe by 2.8 to get the peak to peak RF voltages observed with an oscilloscope. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/21/2019 9:13 PM, Bert wrote: > HI Don and Petr, > > Thanks for the offer Petr but Don has already been kind enough to send > me the Rev. D, 2000 K1 Manual. Thanks anyway! > > I find it quite difficult sometimes to troubleshoot and follow the > schematics. Also doing signal tracing in the receiver and > transmitter is quite subjective using only an RF probe. It would be > better to have some RF values p-p so you could use > a oscilloscope and at the same time see the signal. > From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sun Apr 21 22:38:10 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 22:38:10 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 - Bar Graph Erratic In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3cbfa871-6416-1db5-0a01-78a800ebc119@embarqmail.com> Robbie, It sounds to me like you have an RF Gain Control that is worn. Sine it has been out of service for a while, you might be able to restore it by rotating the RF Gain knob through its rotation 10 to 20 times. If that does not correct it, then replacing the control is the only option. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/21/2019 9:07 PM, Robie Elms wrote:bi > All, > > My K2 has been out of service for an extended period. Today, I put it back > on the air and it appears to function properly, except for the bar graph > display which is erratic. When I rotate the rf gain control counter > clockwise segments begin to illuminate until the 3rd is illuminated. As i > continue to turn the control no more bars illuminate until I reach about > the 9 o'clock position and then the remaining segments turn on. When I > turn the control clockwise the segments remain lit until I reach about the > 2 o'clock position and then they begin turning off. This is one of several > patterns I see. Some times all the segments turn on and stay on and at > other times, only the two left most ones turn on. Receiver gain seems to > change in relation to the RF gain control's position. From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sun Apr 21 22:47:28 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 22:47:28 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 with KXPA100 In-Reply-To: <05f97a99-fcd2-4400-8817-6da2e1fd0504@www.fastmail.com> References: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> <1555883929118-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <05f97a99-fcd2-4400-8817-6da2e1fd0504@www.fastmail.com> Message-ID: <477af041-a203-03d7-493e-c12f6dfd4765@embarqmail.com> Jay, You will need to key the amplifier with a keying output from the K2. Yes, the amp will detect band and frequency, but you still need a KEYOUT from the K2. The best solution is to use the N0SS Amplifier Keying board. Since Tom is SK, no kits are available, but I understand you can obtain the boards from FAR circuits - or the circuit is simple enough that you can build it on perfboard using Tom's full size board layout. See http://www.mmccs.com/mmarc/n0ss/k2_t-r_rly_drvr.pdf. Thank you for your help at RARSfest - the Amazon package arrived today - Thanks. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/21/2019 8:23 PM, Jay Rutherford wrote: > Greetings all, > > How could I use the KXPA100 amp with my K2? I don't think the K2 has a keying line, and so I wonder if the KXPA100 would automatically detect band and frequency through the built-in tuner without a keying line cable. Any info appreciated. > > 73 Jay K3BH From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sun Apr 21 22:51:37 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 22:51:37 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] XV144 ATF34143 phemt equivalent In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <47a094ee-698b-fd8b-54db-97d34664106f@embarqmail.com> Chris, Have you tried ordering the part from Elecraft? I am assuming they still have some in stock. Email to parts at elecraft.com with the part number and description and you should receive a return email with the cost. That will allow you to use the Quick Order form on the website to order and complete the purchase. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/21/2019 7:07 PM, Chris Reed wrote: > Hi all, > The ATF34143 Phemt used on the rx input is discontinued and I just wondered what the suggested replacement would be for this little gremlin. I've Just purchased a second hand XV144 and I'm not getting any variation when I adjust c1 and it looks like the 34143 has already been changed looking at the state of the solder. > Any guidance would be much appreciated. > ATB > Chris > G1rpo From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sun Apr 21 23:07:32 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 23:07:32 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 VCO Alignment - Low voltage In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3ddde518-8933-d02b-4bca-2462452b4451@embarqmail.com> Mark, See my prior email. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/21/2019 1:43 PM, Mark Yergin wrote: > I'm getting 0.02 V at R30, not 6V. Turns on T5 correct and wound per > image. Reflowed the four solder joints and verified continuity between 1 > and 2, 3 and 4. C72 is correct value (label 271) and reflowed. L30 is the > correct value (large slot), and reflowed. D21-26 confirmed as correct > values. C71-74 confirmed as correct values. > > Suggestions? > > Mark W8EWH > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From kevinr at coho.net Mon Apr 22 00:22:03 2019 From: kevinr at coho.net (kevinr) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 21:22:03 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report Message-ID: <771a99f7-ea1f-0225-7c0f-217f9b1c8f40@coho.net> Good Evening, ?? Twenty meters was noisy but open to the east.? QSB was deep so repetition was appreciated.? Forty meters was also noisy but QSB was deeper, cutting out whole words.? It was fun digging out all of you.? I did have one problem.? I thought I was copying noise. The signal was so weak I was only getting one letter now and then.? So close to the noise I thought I was imagining it.? But every time I replied with a ? or a new CQ I would get the same response.? Then on forty meters Brian admitted he was trying to work me with 12 watts.? On the second band he was easy copy even with the deep QSB.? Dave was in the noise too but his call sign is very recognizable.? It seems to flow over the QSB somehow. ? On 14050.5 kHz at 2200z: W0CZ - Ken - ND K6XK - Roy - IA K4JPN - Steve - GA K4TO - Dave - KY ? On 7047.5 kHz at 0000z: AE6JV - Bill - CA K0DTJ - Brian - CA K4TO - Dave - KY K6XK - Roy - IA K6PJV - Dale - CA I am glad the sun was active over the last two weeks.? Conditions are a little better.? The solar forecast is for another full year before any increase in sunspots.? Good time to test your weak signal techniques and buff your antennas. ?? Until next week 73, ????? Kevin.? KD5ONS - From indians at xsmail.com Mon Apr 22 01:50:42 2019 From: indians at xsmail.com (Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 22:50:42 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] K1 manual revisions In-Reply-To: References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <1555420624328-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <286029a9-52f5-93f4-f4f4-a61c36a20a34@embarqmail.com> <0c73227e-199d-0435-e5ed-c0ebbfc76fba@bell.net> <1555883876520-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <1555912242463-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Don and Bert, Thanks for inputs from both. All measurement was done without the filter board. Petr ----- 73 - Petr, OK1RP "Apple & Elecraft freak" B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com MeWe: https://bit.ly/2HGPoDx MeWe: https://bit.ly/2FmwvDt -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From heinz.baertschi at bluewin.ch Mon Apr 22 02:34:49 2019 From: heinz.baertschi at bluewin.ch (Heinz Baertschi) Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2019 23:34:49 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] K2 with KXPA100 In-Reply-To: <477af041-a203-03d7-493e-c12f6dfd4765@embarqmail.com> References: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> <1555883929118-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <05f97a99-fcd2-4400-8817-6da2e1fd0504@www.fastmail.com> <477af041-a203-03d7-493e-c12f6dfd4765@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <1555914889348-0.post@n2.nabble.com> There is another source here: DX ENGINEERING Clifton Labs Buffer Amplifier Kit for Elecraft K2 (Built & Tested Z10000C PCB, Mounting Hardware, Insulation, Coaxial Cables w/Connectors, Kit), $47.99 73, Heinz HB9BCB Don Wilhelm wrote > Jay, > > You will need to key the amplifier with a keying output from the K2. > Yes, the amp will detect band and frequency, but you still need a KEYOUT > from the K2. > The best solution is to use the N0SS Amplifier Keying board. Since Tom > is SK, no kits are available, but I understand you can obtain the boards > from FAR circuits - or the circuit is simple enough that you can build > it on perfboard using Tom's full size board layout. See > http://www.mmccs.com/mmarc/n0ss/k2_t-r_rly_drvr.pdf. > > Thank you for your help at RARSfest - the Amazon package arrived today - > Thanks. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/21/2019 8:23 PM, Jay Rutherford wrote: >> Greetings all, >> >> How could I use the KXPA100 amp with my K2? I don't think the K2 has a >> keying line, and so I wonder if the KXPA100 would automatically detect >> band and frequency through the built-in tuner without a keying line >> cable. Any info appreciated. >> >> 73 Jay K3BH > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto: > Elecraft at .qth > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From g1rpo at live.co.uk Mon Apr 22 03:10:28 2019 From: g1rpo at live.co.uk (Chris Reed) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 07:10:28 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] XV144 ATF34143 phemt equivalent In-Reply-To: <47a094ee-698b-fd8b-54db-97d34664106f@embarqmail.com> References: <47a094ee-698b-fd8b-54db-97d34664106f@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Don, I had thought about it, but it's a long way to send it and figured i should be able to find something more local. The Doc's suggested an equivalent which I can get ( I'll get a few just in case), so will give it a go and see if fixes it. It certainly down on sensitivity, my IC7400 is better on 2m at the moment. Thank you for the quick response, very much appreciated. Vy 73 Chris G1rpo Sent from my iPad > On 22 Apr 2019, at 03:51, Don Wilhelm wrote: > > Chris, > > Have you tried ordering the part from Elecraft? I am assuming they still have some in stock. Email to parts at elecraft.com with the part number and description and you should receive a return email with the cost. That will allow you to use the Quick Order form on the website to order and complete the purchase. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > >> On 4/21/2019 7:07 PM, Chris Reed wrote: >> Hi all, >> The ATF34143 Phemt used on the rx input is discontinued and I just wondered what the suggested replacement would be for this little gremlin. I've Just purchased a second hand XV144 and I'm not getting any variation when I adjust c1 and it looks like the 34143 has already been changed looking at the state of the solder. >> Any guidance would be much appreciated. >> ATB >> Chris >> G1rpo From donwilh at embarqmail.com Mon Apr 22 07:54:51 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 07:54:51 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 with KXPA100 In-Reply-To: <1555914889348-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> <1555883929118-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <05f97a99-fcd2-4400-8817-6da2e1fd0504@www.fastmail.com> <477af041-a203-03d7-493e-c12f6dfd4765@embarqmail.com> <1555914889348-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Heinz, That buffer amp is for an IF output from the K2, and is NOT an amplifier keying output. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/22/2019 2:34 AM, Heinz Baertschi wrote: > There is another source here: > > DX ENGINEERING Clifton Labs Buffer Amplifier Kit for Elecraft K2 (Built & > Tested Z10000C PCB, Mounting Hardware, Insulation, Coaxial Cables > w/Connectors, Kit), $47.99 > > 73, > Heinz HB9BCB > > > > Don Wilhelm wrote >> Jay, >> >> You will need to key the amplifier with a keying output from the K2. >> Yes, the amp will detect band and frequency, but you still need a KEYOUT >> from the K2. >> The best solution is to use the N0SS Amplifier Keying board. Since Tom >> is SK, no kits are available, but I understand you can obtain the boards >> from FAR circuits - or the circuit is simple enough that you can build >> it on perfboard using Tom's full size board layout. See >> http://www.mmccs.com/mmarc/n0ss/k2_t-r_rly_drvr.pdf. >> >> Thank you for your help at RARSfest - the Amazon package arrived today - >> Thanks. >> >> 73, >> Don W3FPR >> >> On 4/21/2019 8:23 PM, Jay Rutherford wrote: >>> Greetings all, >>> >>> How could I use the KXPA100 amp with my K2? I don't think the K2 has a >>> keying line, and so I wonder if the KXPA100 would automatically detect >>> band and frequency through the built-in tuner without a keying line >>> cable. Any info appreciated. >>> >>> 73 Jay K3BH >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto: > >> Elecraft at .qth > >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From ab4iq at comcast.net Mon Apr 22 08:02:22 2019 From: ab4iq at comcast.net (AB4IQ) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 07:02:22 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 with KXPA100 In-Reply-To: References: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> <1555883929118-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <05f97a99-fcd2-4400-8817-6da2e1fd0504@www.fastmail.com> <477af041-a203-03d7-493e-c12f6dfd4765@embarqmail.com> <1555914889348-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <001f01d4f903$4bdab6f0$e39024d0$@comcast.net> You are correct Don, Far Circuits does have the board for the N0SS amp Keying circuit. I have installed it in both of my K2's and works great. They also have the board for your fixed Audio out. They are hard to find on his web page so I just called him and he took care of my order. Ed.... AB4IQ -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Don Wilhelm Sent: Monday, April 22, 2019 6:55 AM To: Heinz Baertschi ; elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 with KXPA100 Heinz, That buffer amp is for an IF output from the K2, and is NOT an amplifier keying output. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/22/2019 2:34 AM, Heinz Baertschi wrote: > There is another source here: > > DX ENGINEERING Clifton Labs Buffer Amplifier Kit for Elecraft K2 > (Built & Tested Z10000C PCB, Mounting Hardware, Insulation, Coaxial > Cables w/Connectors, Kit), $47.99 > > 73, > Heinz HB9BCB > > > > Don Wilhelm wrote >> Jay, >> >> You will need to key the amplifier with a keying output from the K2. >> Yes, the amp will detect band and frequency, but you still need a >> KEYOUT from the K2. >> The best solution is to use the N0SS Amplifier Keying board. Since >> Tom is SK, no kits are available, but I understand you can obtain the >> boards from FAR circuits - or the circuit is simple enough that you >> can build it on perfboard using Tom's full size board layout. See >> http://www.mmccs.com/mmarc/n0ss/k2_t-r_rly_drvr.pdf. >> >> Thank you for your help at RARSfest - the Amazon package arrived >> today - Thanks. >> >> 73, >> Don W3FPR >> >> On 4/21/2019 8:23 PM, Jay Rutherford wrote: >>> Greetings all, >>> >>> How could I use the KXPA100 amp with my K2? I don't think the K2 has >>> a keying line, and so I wonder if the KXPA100 would automatically >>> detect band and frequency through the built-in tuner without a >>> keying line cable. Any info appreciated. >>> >>> 73 Jay K3BH >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto: > >> Elecraft at .qth > >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this >> email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From heinz.baertschi at bluewin.ch Mon Apr 22 08:05:46 2019 From: heinz.baertschi at bluewin.ch (=?utf-8?Q?Heinz_B=C3=A4rtschi?=) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 14:05:46 +0200 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 with KXPA100 In-Reply-To: References: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> <1555883929118-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <05f97a99-fcd2-4400-8817-6da2e1fd0504@www.fastmail.com> <477af041-a203-03d7-493e-c12f6dfd4765@embarqmail.com> <1555914889348-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <341AC8FD-6A37-4F0C-8740-B3D262738C52@bluewin.ch> Don, Sorry but I answeted to the originally question? 73, Heinz HB9BCB Am 22.04.2019 um 13:54 schrieb Don Wilhelm : Heinz, That buffer amp is for an IF output from the K2, and is NOT an amplifier keying output. 73, Don W3FPR > On 4/22/2019 2:34 AM, Heinz Baertschi wrote: > There is another source here: > DX ENGINEERING Clifton Labs Buffer Amplifier Kit for Elecraft K2 (Built & > Tested Z10000C PCB, Mounting Hardware, Insulation, Coaxial Cables > w/Connectors, Kit), $47.99 > 73, > Heinz HB9BCB > Don Wilhelm wrote >> Jay, >> >> You will need to key the amplifier with a keying output from the K2. >> Yes, the amp will detect band and frequency, but you still need a KEYOUT >> from the K2. >> The best solution is to use the N0SS Amplifier Keying board. Since Tom >> is SK, no kits are available, but I understand you can obtain the boards >> from FAR circuits - or the circuit is simple enough that you can build >> it on perfboard using Tom's full size board layout. See >> http://www.mmccs.com/mmarc/n0ss/k2_t-r_rly_drvr.pdf. >> >> Thank you for your help at RARSfest - the Amazon package arrived today - >> Thanks. >> >> 73, >> Don W3FPR >> >>> On 4/21/2019 8:23 PM, Jay Rutherford wrote: >>> Greetings all, >>> >>> How could I use the KXPA100 amp with my K2? I don't think the K2 has a >>> keying line, and so I wonder if the KXPA100 would automatically detect >>> band and frequency through the built-in tuner without a keying line >>> cable. Any info appreciated. >>> >>> 73 Jay K3BH >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto: >> Elecraft at .qth >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From ww3s at zoominternet.net Mon Apr 22 08:14:28 2019 From: ww3s at zoominternet.net (Jamie WW3S) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 12:14:28 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] pair of N6TV Y box for sale Message-ID: includes one original Y box, one newer revision box, two 15 pin cables, and one Jameco 5V DC wall wart (non switching), 150.00 shipped in US, paypal ok. From heinz.baertschi at bluewin.ch Mon Apr 22 08:14:42 2019 From: heinz.baertschi at bluewin.ch (=?utf-8?Q?Heinz_B=C3=A4rtschi?=) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 14:14:42 +0200 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 with KXPA100 In-Reply-To: References: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> <1555883929118-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <05f97a99-fcd2-4400-8817-6da2e1fd0504@www.fastmail.com> <477af041-a203-03d7-493e-c12f6dfd4765@embarqmail.com> <1555914889348-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <32F9524D-9953-4658-ABF6-22A0FD8EEC89@bluewin.ch> Sorry sorry Don, You are absolutely correct!!! 73, Heinz HB9BCB Am 22.04.2019 um 13:54 schrieb Don Wilhelm : Heinz, That buffer amp is for an IF output from the K2, and is NOT an amplifier keying output. 73, Don W3FPR > On 4/22/2019 2:34 AM, Heinz Baertschi wrote: > There is another source here: > DX ENGINEERING Clifton Labs Buffer Amplifier Kit for Elecraft K2 (Built & > Tested Z10000C PCB, Mounting Hardware, Insulation, Coaxial Cables > w/Connectors, Kit), $47.99 > 73, > Heinz HB9BCB > Don Wilhelm wrote >> Jay, >> >> You will need to key the amplifier with a keying output from the K2. >> Yes, the amp will detect band and frequency, but you still need a KEYOUT >> from the K2. >> The best solution is to use the N0SS Amplifier Keying board. Since Tom >> is SK, no kits are available, but I understand you can obtain the boards >> from FAR circuits - or the circuit is simple enough that you can build >> it on perfboard using Tom's full size board layout. See >> http://www.mmccs.com/mmarc/n0ss/k2_t-r_rly_drvr.pdf. >> >> Thank you for your help at RARSfest - the Amazon package arrived today - >> Thanks. >> >> 73, >> Don W3FPR >> >>> On 4/21/2019 8:23 PM, Jay Rutherford wrote: >>> Greetings all, >>> >>> How could I use the KXPA100 amp with my K2? I don't think the K2 has a >>> keying line, and so I wonder if the KXPA100 would automatically detect >>> band and frequency through the built-in tuner without a keying line >>> cable. Any info appreciated. >>> >>> 73 Jay K3BH >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto: >> Elecraft at .qth >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From k3bh at arrl.net Mon Apr 22 08:25:08 2019 From: k3bh at arrl.net (Jay Rutherford) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 08:25:08 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 with KXPA100 In-Reply-To: <477af041-a203-03d7-493e-c12f6dfd4765@embarqmail.com> References: <2125058617.1200495.1555870506796@mail.yahoo.com> <1555883929118-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <05f97a99-fcd2-4400-8817-6da2e1fd0504@www.fastmail.com> <477af041-a203-03d7-493e-c12f6dfd4765@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <225925e9-c050-40cb-b72b-3877fc4aae9a@www.fastmail.com> Don (and Ed and Heinz), Thank you for the information. I have Tom's legacy website so will look up the board. Don, I enjoyed my day with the Elecraft gang at the hamfest; thanks for the invite. I'll see you at Dayton, if you can make it. 73 Jay K3BH On Sun, Apr 21, 2019, at 22:47, Don Wilhelm wrote: > Jay, > > You will need to key the amplifier with a keying output from the K2. > Yes, the amp will detect band and frequency, but you still need a KEYOUT > from the K2. > The best solution is to use the N0SS Amplifier Keying board. Since Tom > is SK, no kits are available, but I understand you can obtain the boards > from FAR circuits - or the circuit is simple enough that you can build > it on perfboard using Tom's full size board layout. See > http://www.mmccs.com/mmarc/n0ss/k2_t-r_rly_drvr.pdf. > > Thank you for your help at RARSfest - the Amazon package arrived today - > Thanks. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/21/2019 8:23 PM, Jay Rutherford wrote: > > Greetings all, > > > > How could I use the KXPA100 amp with my K2? I don't think the K2 has a keying line, and so I wonder if the KXPA100 would automatically detect band and frequency through the built-in tuner without a keying line cable. Any info appreciated. > > > > 73 Jay K3BH > From gbconsulting54 at gmail.com Mon Apr 22 10:31:19 2019 From: gbconsulting54 at gmail.com (Greg Best) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 09:31:19 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] BAND CHANGE DEFAULT Message-ID: Currently, the K3 VFO A switches to the new band when selecting a new band but VFO B remains on the previous band. I can see where that might be a good thing for certain contests but how do I set the default VFO B switch so that it follows A or so that it also switches to the new band? 73?s Greg N9GB From wv4tn.tn at gmail.com Mon Apr 22 12:25:34 2019 From: wv4tn.tn at gmail.com (Wayne Houser) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 12:25:34 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] FOR SALE--LOADED K3S--GREAT PRICE Message-ID: Have used my K3S for less than 3 months and have decided to go a different route, so am selling the K3S, P3 and speaker. The radio is the loaded version--meaning the DX'er/Contester version and has the latest software updates in it. Bought it all new at just over 6200.00 dollars and will sell at 4995.00, plus shipping. Get ahold of me at off reflector e-mail. Wayne.....WV4TN From dl2mdu at darc.de Mon Apr 22 13:20:15 2019 From: dl2mdu at darc.de (Christian Friess) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:20:15 +0200 Subject: [Elecraft] BAND CHANGE DEFAULT In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Greg, I am afraid that depends on the VFO Setup in the Config Menu. VFO IND, if set to YES, allows VFO B to be set to a different band than VFO A. 73 de Chris, DL2MDU Am 22.04.2019 um 16:31 schrieb Greg Best: > Currently, the K3 VFO A switches to the new band when selecting a new band > but VFO B remains on the previous band. I can see where that might be a > good thing for certain contests but how do I set the default VFO B switch so > that it follows A or so that it also switches to the new band? > > 73?s > Greg N9GB > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From wv4tn.tn at gmail.com Mon Apr 22 15:06:20 2019 From: wv4tn.tn at gmail.com (Wayne Houser) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 15:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S FOR SALE +Speaker and P3 Panadapter Message-ID: New K3S used about 2 to 3 months now for sale. It's the loaded DXer/Contester Version. Want to sell as a complete set. I am discounting the original price by over $1000.00.............Contact Wayne.......WV4TN at qrz.com e-mail address. From jim at jtmiller.com Mon Apr 22 20:18:29 2019 From: jim at jtmiller.com (Jim Miller) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 20:18:29 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 PF keys? Message-ID: Anyone find some good use for PF1 and PF2? I'm thinking of putting the KPA1500 RF deck and PSU out of arms reach but still in the shack to reduce their noise impact. I'll use the KPA1500 Utility if I decide that works for me. If it doesn't make a real difference in noise I'll just revert to "normal". Thanks jim ab3cv From rocketnj at gmail.com Mon Apr 22 20:22:31 2019 From: rocketnj at gmail.com (Dave) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 20:22:31 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 PF keys? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I use them to toggle between fan speed 0 and fan speed 1. Dave wo2x Sent from my iPad > On Apr 22, 2019, at 8:18 PM, Jim Miller wrote: > > Anyone find some good use for PF1 and PF2? > > I'm thinking of putting the KPA1500 RF deck and PSU out of arms reach but > still in the shack to reduce their noise impact. I'll use the KPA1500 > Utility if I decide that works for me. > > If it doesn't make a real difference in noise I'll just revert to "normal". > > Thanks > > jim ab3cv > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From elanzl at sbcglobal.net Mon Apr 22 22:22:22 2019 From: elanzl at sbcglobal.net (Eric Lanzl) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 02:22:22 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft SSB net References: <1733165125.3277919.1555986142758.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1733165125.3277919.1555986142758@mail.yahoo.com> Here is the log for last Sunday's ssb net. Thanks to all who checked in and to the stations that helped relay stations I could not here. Remember to join us on Sundays at 18:00Z on 14.303.5 for the net. Elecraft SSB Net? 4-21-2019 WB9JNZ???????????????????? Eric????? IL?????? K3??????? ??????? ? 4017??? NET CONTROL NC0JW?????????????????????? Jim????? CO????? KX3???? ???? ? ? ? 1536??? RELAY STATION NA5C????????????????????????? Steve?? TX?????? K3S???? ???????? 10121 N7BDL??????????????????????? Terry?? AZ????? ? K3S??? ????? ? ? 10373? RELAY STATION W1NGA??????????????????? ?? Al???????? CO????? K3???? ?????????? 5765 K7BRR??????????????????????? Bill?????? AZ?????? K3S???????????? 10939 K8NU/7?????????????????????? Carl???? OH/WA?????????? ????????? FT 2000 remote from Washington state AE6JV???????????????????????? Bill?????? CA???? K3??????? ????????? 6299 W7QHD???????????????????? ? Kurt???? AZ????? K2/100 ? ???????? 1538 KO5V????????????????????????? Jim????? NM????? K2/100 ?? ??????? 7225 W1DFB?????????????????????? Don???? AZ?????? K3??????? ?????????? 2937 K5TH?????????????????????????? Tim????? TX?????? IC7300? will have KX2/500? 2967 AD1G???????????????????????? ? Dick???? NY?????? K3 K6ADE???????????????????????? Alan???? CA?????? K3??????? ???????? 4757 K6WDE????????????????????? ? Dave?? CA?????? KX3???? ??????????? 4599 W4DML??????????????????????? Doug?? TN?????? K3??????? ?????????? 6433 K7JG???????????????????????? ?? John??? WA????? KX3???? ?????????? 3519 NS7P?????????????????????????? Phil????? OR????? K3??????? ????????? 1826 AI6B???????????????????????????? Brian??? CA?????? KX3??????????????? 3084 From kg9hfrank at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 01:51:06 2019 From: kg9hfrank at gmail.com (Frank Krozel) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 00:51:06 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 missing 6kHz filter - all ok? Message-ID: <1E4E94BC-C14A-4649-AAE2-197591AB45BF@gmail.com> So I purchased a used K3, it arrives in a few hours. Trying to get smart before I unbox, I recall the past user removing the 6kHz filter and leaving in the 2.7, 500 and 250kHz filters in place. Somewhere tonight I recall reading that all the filters need to be in descending order. The fact that the 6kHz filter is no longer in there is leaving a ?space? for it in the receivers (it has two receivers in it) is that still ok? de KG9H From indians at xsmail.com Tue Apr 23 02:05:55 2019 From: indians at xsmail.com (Petr, OK1RP/M0SIS) Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 23:05:55 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] K1 manual revisions In-Reply-To: <88d78604-8dae-2cc0-e113-42a5a0e2c422@bell.net> References: <1555314267968-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <1555420624328-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <286029a9-52f5-93f4-f4f4-a61c36a20a34@embarqmail.com> <0c73227e-199d-0435-e5ed-c0ebbfc76fba@bell.net> <1555883876520-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <7c1a939b-3e5d-2653-694a-4e113c7c046e@embarqmail.com> <88d78604-8dae-2cc0-e113-42a5a0e2c422@bell.net> Message-ID: <1555999555541-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Hi Don, yes filter board is not inserted during these tests on page 45-46...(resistance and voltage tests) Thanks for hints, Petr ----- 73 - Petr, OK1RP "Apple & Elecraft freak" B:http://ok1rp.blogspot.com MeWe: https://bit.ly/2HGPoDx MeWe: https://bit.ly/2FmwvDt -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From n4fn.neil at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 07:49:30 2019 From: n4fn.neil at gmail.com (Neil Foster) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 07:49:30 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 PF buttons Message-ID: Since my radios are not Elecraft, I use them to switch the amp between the FLEX 64500 and the Yaesu FTdx5000 Neil N4FN From wg6h at yahoo.com Tue Apr 23 09:53:55 2019 From: wg6h at yahoo.com (Bill) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] RE K2 Bar Graph Erratic References: <836039540.4445035.1556027635543.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <836039540.4445035.1556027635543@mail.yahoo.com> Robie, My K2 had the same problem that you described?after a long period of not being used.? After severaldays of?being left powered on? and daily use, the problem went away. My theory is that bypass capacitors in the K2 may have "reformed" and eliminatednoise in some circuit that was affecting the S meter bar graph. As Don says, it could also ?be a noisy RF gain pot. Even though the K2 is a dated design it is still a great rig. I would never part with mine. Bill - K6WLM From k5apl41 at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 09:59:59 2019 From: k5apl41 at gmail.com (wes Bolin) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 08:59:59 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 Bird Message-ID: With no antenna I have a weak bird at 14.221.5 +/- .......Don't hear it on my other transceiver. I changed from switching ps to Old School ps and no change. Is this normal? BtW with my vertical antenna and present band conditions, it is totally inaudible with the antenna connected. From k2vco.vic at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 10:15:03 2019 From: k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:15:03 +0300 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 Bird In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: From ko5v at earthlink.net Tue Apr 23 11:14:52 2019 From: ko5v at earthlink.net (Jim KO5V) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:14:52 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Elecraft] K2 Bird Message-ID: <1528506323.4793.1556032492975@wamui-duchess.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Wes, FYI, my K2, S/N 7225, also has a faint birdie in about the same spot, but only with the antenna hooked up, listening to "white" noise. There are several birdies in all bands with no antenna, but I can only hear most of them with the AF and RF Gain pots maxed out. Most will disappear underneath a received signal (even noise), but there are a couple that are loud enough to hear with one. It's not been a problem for me. 73, Jim KO5V From hbjr at optilink.us Tue Apr 23 11:24:18 2019 From: hbjr at optilink.us (Hank) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:24:18 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 missing 6kHz filter - all ok? In-Reply-To: <1E4E94BC-C14A-4649-AAE2-197591AB45BF@gmail.com> References: <1E4E94BC-C14A-4649-AAE2-197591AB45BF@gmail.com> Message-ID: Yes...I operated a K3s for several months with the 1st filter position open.? The K3 will need to be instructed that the position is open.? The free K3 utility software will help you do that.? When you set up the radio the first time, follow the manual for setup/calibration and you will find those instructions on how to do that. You will also want to check to be sure the radio is on the latest firmware which that software can also do for you. The you can save the current config for safe keeping. Hank K4HYJ -----Original Message----- > From: "Frank Krozel" > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Date: 04/23/19 01:51 > Subject: [Elecraft] K3 missing 6kHz filter - all ok? > > So I purchased a used K3, it arrives in a few hours. > Trying to get smart before I unbox, I recall the past user removing the 6kHz filter and leaving in the 2.7, 500 and 250kHz filters in place. > Somewhere tonight I recall reading that all the filters need to be in descending order. ?The fact that the 6kHz filter is no longer in there is leaving a ?space? for it in the receivers (it has two receivers in it) is that still ok? > de KG9H > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From kg9hfrank at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 11:39:47 2019 From: kg9hfrank at gmail.com (Frank Krozel) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:39:47 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 missing 6kHz filter - all ok? In-Reply-To: References: <1E4E94BC-C14A-4649-AAE2-197591AB45BF@gmail.com> Message-ID: <29787593-2E34-423C-89BF-786C4C1829D7@gmail.com> OK thank you very much I don?t need any more responses I think that my thoughts were verified everybody have a good day Sincerely, Frank Krozel t: 1-630-924-1600 frank at electronicinstrument.com BSEE, AASEET, FCC Lic.# PG-18-19178, KG9H Electronic Instrument Associates - Central, Inc. ...since 1971 w: www.electronicinstrument.com d/l our linecard at http://www.electronicinstrument.com/lc.pdf > On Apr 23, 2019, at 10:24 AM, Hank wrote: > > > Yes...I operated a K3s for several months with the 1st filter position open. The K3 will need to be instructed that the position is open. The free K3 utility software will help you do that. When you set up the radio the first time, follow the manual for setup/calibration and you will find those instructions on how to do that. You will also want to check to be sure the radio is on the latest firmware which that software can also do for you. > > > The you can save the current config for safe keeping. > > > Hank > K4HYJ > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> From: "Frank Krozel" >> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> Date: 04/23/19 01:51 >> Subject: [Elecraft] K3 missing 6kHz filter - all ok? >> >> So I purchased a used K3, it arrives in a few hours. >> Trying to get smart before I unbox, I recall the past user removing the 6kHz filter and leaving in the 2.7, 500 and 250kHz filters in place. >> Somewhere tonight I recall reading that all the filters need to be in descending order. The fact that the 6kHz filter is no longer in there is leaving a ?space? for it in the receivers (it has two receivers in it) is that still ok? >> de KG9H >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From ed.n3cw at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 12:08:12 2019 From: ed.n3cw at gmail.com (Ed G) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 12:08:12 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 PF keys In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5cbf386d.1c69fb81.a0be5.0f7b@mx.google.com> Jim ? you may have to put the RF deck and PSU a bit farther than out of arms reach. I have my PSU on the other side of a nearby wall (in a utility/workshop room) and so that unit is completely quiet. With headphones, the RF deck fans can?t be heard, although I am considering relocating the deck to where the PSU is. I do like the remote utility program, but I really would like to see a KPA1500 hardware remote unit?something like the ACOM 2000 uses. I would buy one of those in a minute. --Ed, N3CW? Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Message: 22 Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 20:18:29 -0400 From: Jim Miller To: Elecraft Reflector Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 PF keys? Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Anyone find some good use for PF1 and PF2? I'm thinking of putting the KPA1500 RF deck and PSU out of arms reach but still in the shack to reduce their noise impact. I'll use the KPA1500 Utility if I decide that works for me. If it doesn't make a real difference in noise I'll just revert to "normal". Thanks jim ab3cv --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From benton-webb at hotmail.com Tue Apr 23 13:25:49 2019 From: benton-webb at hotmail.com (Paul Webb) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:25:49 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] FS: Message-ID: Selling K2 SN 7629, $400, off list, Paul K5HKX From wv4tn.tn at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 13:34:58 2019 From: wv4tn.tn at gmail.com (Wayne Houser) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 13:34:58 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S For Sale Message-ID: Have a K3S, almost new for sale. It is the DXer/Contester Version. Get ahold of me off the reflector at my qrz.com address. Wayne WV4TN From kc1blt at gmail.com Tue Apr 23 14:40:11 2019 From: kc1blt at gmail.com (Hai Nguyen Ly) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 14:40:11 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] FS: Elecraft T1 Message-ID: <847B5BD4-EABE-4181-ACA8-708C186EB7C1@gmail.com> Afternoon all: I purchased the following items in hopes of setting up a portable QRP station/coms go kit of sorts with the Yaesu FT817ND, however I'm finding that work and family commitments leave me little to no time for the hobby. I also recently obtained a KX2 which also streamlines my QRP aspirations a bit in the event I have the opportunity to operate. Since I don't need the gear redundancy at this time, I'm offering the following equipment in like new condition. Please reach out with any questions. Payment via Paypal, Square Cash, or alternative electronic means is preferred. Item : T1 ATU (Factory Assembled) SKU : T1-A Quantity : 1 Original Item Price : $159.95 Asking Price: $120 shipped Item : FT-817 Remote Control Adapt. for T1 SKU : T1-FT817 Quantity : 1 Original Item Price : $59.95 Asking price: $25.00 shipped Price for both items: $140.00 shipped 73: Hai, KC1BLT From n4zr at comcast.net Tue Apr 23 17:19:06 2019 From: n4zr at comcast.net (N4ZR) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:19:06 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 Message-ID: Running into what I'm sure is a simple matter of menu settings, but... My K3 is set for PTT with a "normal" TX delay of 008 (I presume 8 ms.), driving a KPA-1500.? I am getting persistent reports of clipping one dash worth at the beginning of each transmission, so my casll becomes "E4ZR", for example.? I've been through both manuals, and aside from setting a higher TX Delay, I don't know what I can do to clean this up. so what am I missing? -- 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at , now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spots, please use your favorite "retail" DX cluster. From ww3s at zoominternet.net Tue Apr 23 19:14:40 2019 From: ww3s at zoominternet.net (Jamie WW3S) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 23:14:40 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 for sale Message-ID: S/N 4321 has sub receiver and ATU installed 6 filters main rx 6 khz AM, 2.7 SSB, 2.1 SSB 500 hz CW sub rx 2.7 SSB, 500 hz CW has the new synthesizer boards upgrade in both RX KXV3B interface/preamp board installed (adds rx port, if out, transverter in, 2nd preamp for 12/10/6) K312MDKT hi current mod K3IOBUFFKT installed most other mods installed when the factory installed the upgraded synthesizer boards. great physical condition, few, if any cabinet marks includes power cord and many of the Fred Cady books (may NOT have the mic, if I find it, its included) 2100.00 email me to discuss shipping and payment options (paypal ok, but we need to talk about paypal fees) can deliver to Dayton From a.durbin at msn.com Tue Apr 23 21:23:51 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 01:23:51 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 Message-ID: I don't know what you are missing but, when I was investigating the QSK keying characteristics of the TS-590S, I found a digital storage scope to be very useful. Traces showing key input to rig, amplifier keying output, RF envelope, and RX audio were very informative. At 30 wpm the first element of your call should be 120 ms long so there would have to be a really bad delay for it to disappear completely. I doubt many could detect the loss of the first 8 ms. A 'scope will tell you where the delay is happening if no one comes up with an answer for you. 73, Andy, k3wyc From lists at irdixon.plus.com Wed Apr 24 05:28:20 2019 From: lists at irdixon.plus.com (Roger Dixon) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:28:20 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 Message-ID: <000601d4fa80$0f335fd0$2d9a1f70$@irdixon.plus.com> Hi Pete I had this problem as well - it is a "feature". It occurs if the rising edge of the keying waveform happens at the same time as the PTT line. The ONLY way around this is to delay the keying waveform slightly so it occurs after the PTT. If you are using a WinKey, then set the "lead-in" delay. There is also a feature in N1MM to achieve the same result. 73 Roger - G4BVY -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of N4ZR Sent: 23 April 2019 22:19 To: Elecraft List Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 Running into what I'm sure is a simple matter of menu settings, but... My K3 is set for PTT with a "normal" TX delay of 008 (I presume 8 ms.), driving a KPA-1500. I am getting persistent reports of clipping one dash worth at the beginning of each transmission, so my casll becomes "E4ZR", for example. I've been through both manuals, and aside from setting a higher TX Delay, I don't know what I can do to clean this up. so what am I missing? -- 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at , now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spots, please use your favorite "retail" DX cluster. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From johnae5x at gmail.com Wed Apr 24 06:16:23 2019 From: johnae5x at gmail.com (John Harper) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 05:16:23 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 Message-ID: You may have to move to Palestine. John AE5X https://ae5x.blogspot.com ___________________________ >so my call becomes "E4ZR" >I don't know what I can do to clean this up. From john at kk9a.com Wed Apr 24 07:37:38 2019 From: john at kk9a.com (john at kk9a.com) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 06:37:38 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 Message-ID: <20190424063738.Horde.MvE-V64G6Con4QYpq2H4qX7@www11.qth.com> Try sending your callsign as TN4ZR :) I believe TX Delay 8 is technically less than 8ms however I am guessing that is not your problem since the KPA1500 is very fast. It would help if you gave a description of how you are sending CW. John KK9A N4ZR wrote: Running into what I'm sure is a simple matter of menu settings, but... My K3 is set for PTT with a "normal" TX delay of 008 (I presume 8 ms.), driving a KPA-1500. I am getting persistent reports of clipping one dash worth at the beginning of each transmission, so my casll becomes "E4ZR", for example. I've been through both manuals, and aside from setting a higher TX Delay, I don't know what I can do to clean this up. so what am I missing? -- 73, Pete N4ZR From a.durbin at msn.com Wed Apr 24 08:34:11 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:34:11 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: "It occurs if the rising edge of the keying waveform happens at the same time as the PTT line. The ONLY way around this is to delay the keying waveform slightly so it occurs after the PTT." That would seem to imply that you are not using CW VOX keying. If that is the case then wouldn't using CW VOX eliminate the issue? 73, Andy k3wyc From rmcgraw at blomand.net Wed Apr 24 08:49:13 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 07:49:13 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <79a30b00-ae5a-26c7-156a-6ba95ec91db0@blomand.net> See CW QRO and TX DELAY in the menu.? Also the benefits and likely issues are described in the manual, page 58 and 66 as MENU items.??? As to using other means to key the radio and amp and send CW, those may have their own settings as required. While I do not consider myself a high speed CW op, I do work QSK. ? I do not find any truncation of the first CW element.??? I use the internal keyer and either a Vibroplex Iambic paddle or a Vibroplex single level paddle.? I have VOX set to ON, CW QRO? is OFF and TX DLY to NOR and 008. Hope this helps. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/24/2019 7:34 AM, Andy Durbin wrote: > "It occurs if the rising edge of the keying waveform happens at the same time as the PTT line. The ONLY way around this is to delay the keying waveform slightly so it occurs after the PTT." > > That would seem to imply that you are not using CW VOX keying. If that is the case then wouldn't using CW VOX eliminate the issue? > > 73, > Andy k3wyc > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From k6xk at ncn.net Wed Apr 24 08:55:15 2019 From: k6xk at ncn.net (Roy Koeppe) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 07:55:15 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <3E32A13B44F84104808184B8FA862544@ROYKOEPPEHP> Pete...odd is right. Does it happen when using built-in keyer? 73, Roy K6XK -Running into what I'm sure is a simple matter of menu settings, but... My K3 is set for PTT with a "normal" TX delay of 008 (I presume 8 ms.), driving a KPA-1500. I am getting persistent reports of clipping one dash worth at the beginning of each transmission, so my casll becomes "E4ZR", for example. I've been through both manuals, and aside from setting a higher TX Delay, I don't know what I can do to clean this up. so what am I missing? 73, Pete N4ZR From n4zr at comcast.net Wed Apr 24 09:14:36 2019 From: n4zr at comcast.net (N4ZR) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:14:36 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 In-Reply-To: <79a30b00-ae5a-26c7-156a-6ba95ec91db0@blomand.net> References: <79a30b00-ae5a-26c7-156a-6ba95ec91db0@blomand.net> Message-ID: This appears to be, at least in part, a simple matter of RTFM.? Also, my manual is 9 years old, and there's obviously been a lot of stuff added since then. Experimentally, it appears that must have *both* QSK on - whether Full or Semi - and VOX on.? Once I do this, I see my first dots on the KPA-1500 bar-graph every time.? I do not want to use the built-in keyer in the K3, because most of my operating is CW contesting, and I want to use the Winkeyer to send stored messages from N1MM +.? The manual makes it clear (if only I'd read it) that both QSK and VOX must be enabled for CW. In PTT mode, it appears that my keyer is sending the PTT signal simultaneously with the first RF - not good. Thanks to everyone who helped put me on the right track. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at , now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spots, please use your favorite "retail" DX cluster. On 4/24/2019 8:49 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > See CW QRO and TX DELAY in the menu.? Also the benefits and likely > issues are described in the manual, page 58 and 66 as MENU items.??? > As to using other means to key the radio and amp and send CW, those > may have their own settings as required. > > While I do not consider myself a high speed CW op, I do work QSK. ? I > do not find any truncation of the first CW element.??? I use the > internal keyer and either a Vibroplex Iambic paddle or a Vibroplex > single level paddle.? I have VOX set to ON, CW QRO? is OFF and TX DLY > to NOR and 008. > > Hope this helps. > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX > > > > > On 4/24/2019 7:34 AM, Andy Durbin wrote: >> "It occurs if the rising edge of the keying waveform happens at the >> same time as the PTT line.? The ONLY way around this is to delay the >> keying waveform slightly so it occurs after the PTT." >> >> That would seem to imply that you are not using CW VOX keying. If >> that is the case then wouldn't using CW VOX eliminate the issue? >> >> 73, >> Andy k3wyc >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rmcgraw at blomand.net Wed Apr 24 09:35:06 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 08:35:06 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 In-Reply-To: References: <79a30b00-ae5a-26c7-156a-6ba95ec91db0@blomand.net> Message-ID: <94195602-9048-427A-BA42-AE7E4B247086@blomand.net> Glad you found it and have things up and running correctly. Hope I was able to be of assistance. 73 Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 24, 2019, at 8:14 AM, N4ZR wrote: > > This appears to be, at least in part, a simple matter of RTFM. Also, my manual is 9 years old, and there's obviously been a lot of stuff added since then. Experimentally, it appears that must have *both* QSK on - whether Full or Semi - and VOX on. Once I do this, I see my first dots on the KPA-1500 bar-graph every time. I do not want to use the built-in keyer in the K3, because most of my operating is CW contesting, and I want to use the Winkeyer to send stored messages from N1MM +. The manual makes it clear (if only I'd read it) that both QSK and VOX must be enabled for CW. In PTT mode, it appears that my keyer is sending the PTT signal simultaneously with the first RF - not good. > > Thanks to everyone who helped put me on the right track. > > 73, Pete N4ZR > Check out the Reverse Beacon Network > at , now > spotting RTTY activity worldwide. > For spots, please use your favorite > "retail" DX cluster. > >> On 4/24/2019 8:49 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: >> See CW QRO and TX DELAY in the menu. Also the benefits and likely issues are described in the manual, page 58 and 66 as MENU items. As to using other means to key the radio and amp and send CW, those may have their own settings as required. >> >> While I do not consider myself a high speed CW op, I do work QSK. I do not find any truncation of the first CW element. I use the internal keyer and either a Vibroplex Iambic paddle or a Vibroplex single level paddle. I have VOX set to ON, CW QRO is OFF and TX DLY to NOR and 008. >> >> Hope this helps. >> >> 73 >> >> Bob, K4TAX >> >> >> >> >>> On 4/24/2019 7:34 AM, Andy Durbin wrote: >>> "It occurs if the rising edge of the keying waveform happens at the same time as the PTT line. The ONLY way around this is to delay the keying waveform slightly so it occurs after the PTT." >>> >>> That would seem to imply that you are not using CW VOX keying. If that is the case then wouldn't using CW VOX eliminate the issue? >>> >>> 73, >>> Andy k3wyc >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From k9ma at sdellington.us Wed Apr 24 09:52:03 2019 From: k9ma at sdellington.us (K9MA) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 08:52:03 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 In-Reply-To: References: <79a30b00-ae5a-26c7-156a-6ba95ec91db0@blomand.net> Message-ID: I know this will seem incredible to the software purists, but I have an actual mechanical "switch" in series with the PTT line. The K3 is always in QSK mode, but if I get tired of all the racket, I can just turn on the PTT. That seems to work flawlessly with the KPA1500, as well as my old tube amplifiers. (There's another switch in the keying line, just in case the computer goes nuts. Of course, that could NEVER happen.) 73, Scott K9MA On 4/24/2019 08:14, N4ZR wrote: > This appears to be, at least in part, a simple matter of RTFM.? Also, > my manual is 9 years old, and there's obviously been a lot of stuff > added since then. Experimentally, it appears that must have *both* QSK > on - whether Full or Semi - and VOX on.? Once I do this, I see my > first dots on the KPA-1500 bar-graph every time.? I do not want to use > the built-in keyer in the K3, because most of my operating is CW > contesting, and I want to use the Winkeyer to send stored messages > from N1MM +.? The manual makes it clear (if only I'd read it) that > both QSK and VOX must be enabled for CW. In PTT mode, it appears that > my keyer is sending the PTT signal simultaneously with the first RF - > not good. > > Thanks to everyone who helped put me on the right track. > > 73, Pete N4ZR > Check out the Reverse Beacon Network > at , now > spotting RTTY activity worldwide. > For spots, please use your favorite > "retail" DX cluster. > > On 4/24/2019 8:49 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: >> See CW QRO and TX DELAY in the menu.? Also the benefits and likely >> issues are described in the manual, page 58 and 66 as MENU items.??? >> As to using other means to key the radio and amp and send CW, those >> may have their own settings as required. >> >> While I do not consider myself a high speed CW op, I do work QSK. ? I >> do not find any truncation of the first CW element. I use the >> internal keyer and either a Vibroplex Iambic paddle or a Vibroplex >> single level paddle.? I have VOX set to ON, CW QRO is OFF and TX DLY >> to NOR and 008. >> >> Hope this helps. >> >> 73 >> >> Bob, K4TAX >> >> >> >> >> On 4/24/2019 7:34 AM, Andy Durbin wrote: >>> "It occurs if the rising edge of the keying waveform happens at the >>> same time as the PTT line.? The ONLY way around this is to delay the >>> keying waveform slightly so it occurs after the PTT." >>> >>> That would seem to imply that you are not using CW VOX keying. If >>> that is the case then wouldn't using CW VOX eliminate the issue? >>> >>> 73, >>> Andy k3wyc >>> -- Scott K9MA k9ma at sdellington.us From donwilh at embarqmail.com Wed Apr 24 10:12:45 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:12:45 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 In-Reply-To: References: <79a30b00-ae5a-26c7-156a-6ba95ec91db0@blomand.net> Message-ID: <44800511-1726-fa8f-d4e4-ca5b709cbdcc@embarqmail.com> Scott, What do you mean by "if I get tired of all the racket"? The Elecraft gear is all electronic switching for T/R, so no relay clacking racket. That is true for ALL Elecraft gear, even the oldest K2. That may not be true for your old tube amplifiers, but the original question was about a K3 and a KPA1500, so no relay clacking could be present. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/24/2019 9:52 AM, K9MA wrote: > I know this will seem incredible to the software purists, but I have an > actual mechanical "switch" in series with the PTT line. The K3 is always > in QSK mode, but if I get tired of all the racket, I can just turn on > the PTT. That seems to work flawlessly with the KPA1500, as well as my > old tube amplifiers. (There's another switch in the keying line, just in > case the computer goes nuts. Of course, that could NEVER happen.) > > 73, > Scott K9MA > From lists at irdixon.plus.com Wed Apr 24 10:19:34 2019 From: lists at irdixon.plus.com (Roger Dixon) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 15:19:34 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 In-Reply-To: References: <79a30b00-ae5a-26c7-156a-6ba95ec91db0@blomand.net> Message-ID: <001701d4faa8$bf6b3170$3e419450$@irdixon.plus.com> Hi Pete If you don't want to use VOX and/or QSK ............ I take both the key line and the PTT line from the WinKey to the K3. In N1MM - Config - Config Ports etc - WinKey - Set lead time to 1. Works perfectly !! 73 Roger - G4BVY -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of N4ZR Sent: 24 April 2019 14:15 To: Elecraft List Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 This appears to be, at least in part, a simple matter of RTFM. Also, my manual is 9 years old, and there's obviously been a lot of stuff added since then. Experimentally, it appears that must have *both* QSK on - whether Full or Semi - and VOX on. Once I do this, I see my first dots on the KPA-1500 bar-graph every time. I do not want to use the built-in keyer in the K3, because most of my operating is CW contesting, and I want to use the Winkeyer to send stored messages from N1MM +. The manual makes it clear (if only I'd read it) that both QSK and VOX must be enabled for CW. In PTT mode, it appears that my keyer is sending the PTT signal simultaneously with the first RF - not good. Thanks to everyone who helped put me on the right track. 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at , now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spots, please use your favorite "retail" DX cluster. On 4/24/2019 8:49 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > See CW QRO and TX DELAY in the menu. Also the benefits and likely > issues are described in the manual, page 58 and 66 as MENU items. > As to using other means to key the radio and amp and send CW, those > may have their own settings as required. > > While I do not consider myself a high speed CW op, I do work QSK. I > do not find any truncation of the first CW element. I use the > internal keyer and either a Vibroplex Iambic paddle or a Vibroplex > single level paddle. I have VOX set to ON, CW QRO is OFF and TX DLY > to NOR and 008. > > Hope this helps. > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX > > > > > On 4/24/2019 7:34 AM, Andy Durbin wrote: >> "It occurs if the rising edge of the keying waveform happens at the >> same time as the PTT line. The ONLY way around this is to delay the >> keying waveform slightly so it occurs after the PTT." >> >> That would seem to imply that you are not using CW VOX keying. If >> that is the case then wouldn't using CW VOX eliminate the issue? >> >> 73, >> Andy k3wyc >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this >> email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email > list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From dgdimick at gmail.com Wed Apr 24 10:24:25 2019 From: dgdimick at gmail.com (Denis Dimick) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 08:24:25 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] K1 LED upgrade Message-ID: I was wondering if anyone has a LCD LED upgrade they would be willing to part with? Denis KC6AUP From donwilh at embarqmail.com Wed Apr 24 11:06:37 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 11:06:37 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K1 LED upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Denis, Are you referring to the K1 LCD Backlight Kit for a built K1? If so, I have one available. $29.95 plus shipping. Please let me know if you want it and I can compute the shipping cost - USPS Priority Mail. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/24/2019 10:24 AM, Denis Dimick wrote: > I was wondering if anyone has a LCD LED upgrade they would be willing to > part with? > > Denis > KC6AUP From dgdimick at gmail.com Wed Apr 24 11:25:11 2019 From: dgdimick at gmail.com (Denis Dimick) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:25:11 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] K1 LED upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yes, that is the one. My address is is current in the database Denis KC6AUP On Wed, Apr 24, 2019, 09:06 Don Wilhelm wrote: > Denis, > > Are you referring to the K1 LCD Backlight Kit for a built K1? If so, I > have one available. $29.95 plus shipping. > Please let me know if you want it and I can compute the shipping cost - > USPS Priority Mail. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/24/2019 10:24 AM, Denis Dimick wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone has a LCD LED upgrade they would be willing to > > part with? > > > > Denis > > KC6AUP > From k9ma at sdellington.us Wed Apr 24 11:47:11 2019 From: k9ma at sdellington.us (K9MA) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:47:11 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 In-Reply-To: <44800511-1726-fa8f-d4e4-ca5b709cbdcc@embarqmail.com> References: <79a30b00-ae5a-26c7-156a-6ba95ec91db0@blomand.net> <44800511-1726-fa8f-d4e4-ca5b709cbdcc@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <0468de67-5a7a-ab6b-6f00-968de53938b2@sdellington.us> Don, I use an external vacuum relay for compatibility with my old tube amplifiers. The whole system long predates the KPA1500, and I still sometimes use the tube amplifier. The system also includes small relays for switching receiving antennas and protecting the receiver. However, even without relays, in QSK there's sound from the receiver between characters, of course, which I sometimes prefer not to listen to. This works fine with the K3, as in QSK/VOX mode closing the PTT circuit simply keeps it in transmit mode. My old FT-1000D doesn't work that way, and it's a pain: if you close the PTT circuit in QSK mode, you get a carrier. I'm glad the K3 doesn't work that way. 73, Scott K9MA On 4/24/2019 09:12, Don Wilhelm wrote: > Scott, > > What do you mean by "if I get tired of all the racket"? > The Elecraft gear is all electronic switching for T/R, so no relay > clacking racket.? That is true for ALL Elecraft gear, even the oldest K2. > > That may not be true for your old tube amplifiers, but the original > question was about a K3 and a KPA1500, so no relay clacking could be > present. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/24/2019 9:52 AM, K9MA wrote: >> I know this will seem incredible to the software purists, but I have >> an actual mechanical "switch" in series with the PTT line. The K3 is >> always in QSK mode, but if I get tired of all the racket, I can just >> turn on the PTT. That seems to work flawlessly with the KPA1500, as >> well as my old tube amplifiers. (There's another switch in the keying >> line, just in case the computer goes nuts. Of course, that could >> NEVER happen.) >> >> 73, >> Scott K9MA >> -- Scott K9MA k9ma at sdellington.us From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Wed Apr 24 15:32:15 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 12:32:15 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 In-Reply-To: References: <79a30b00-ae5a-26c7-156a-6ba95ec91db0@blomand.net> Message-ID: <83cc0b46-40f2-fd55-8349-c55151b46d1e@audiosystemsgroup.com> Hi Pete, This is what I've always used, with no issues. 73, Jim K9YC On 4/24/2019 6:14 AM, N4ZR wrote: > Experimentally, it appears that must have *both* QSK on - whether Full > or Semi - and VOX on.? Once I do this, I see my first dots on the > KPA-1500 bar-graph every time. From n4zr at comcast.net Wed Apr 24 16:00:01 2019 From: n4zr at comcast.net (N4ZR) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 16:00:01 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Clipping first element of CW - K3/KPA-1500 In-Reply-To: <44800511-1726-fa8f-d4e4-ca5b709cbdcc@embarqmail.com> References: <79a30b00-ae5a-26c7-156a-6ba95ec91db0@blomand.net> <44800511-1726-fa8f-d4e4-ca5b709cbdcc@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <3b9620b2-327b-30d8-a84d-98eb5c5b3d69@comcast.net> And none is.... 73, Pete N4ZR Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at , now spotting RTTY activity worldwide. For spots, please use your favorite "retail" DX cluster. On 4/24/2019 10:12 AM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > Scott, > > What do you mean by "if I get tired of all the racket"? > The Elecraft gear is all electronic switching for T/R, so no relay > clacking racket.? That is true for ALL Elecraft gear, even the oldest K2. > > That may not be true for your old tube amplifiers, but the original > question was about a K3 and a KPA1500, so no relay clacking could be > present. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/24/2019 9:52 AM, K9MA wrote: >> I know this will seem incredible to the software purists, but I have >> an actual mechanical "switch" in series with the PTT line. The K3 is >> always in QSK mode, but if I get tired of all the racket, I can just >> turn on the PTT. That seems to work flawlessly with the KPA1500, as >> well as my old tube amplifiers. (There's another switch in the keying >> line, just in case the computer goes nuts. Of course, that could >> NEVER happen.) >> >> 73, >> Scott K9MA >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From lladerman at earthlink.net Wed Apr 24 16:26:03 2019 From: lladerman at earthlink.net (W0FK) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 13:26:03 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] FS: LP-PAN2 and ASUS U5 Sound Card for Elecraft K3/K3S Message-ID: <1556137563291-0.post@n2.nabble.com> LP-PAN2 and ASUS U5 Sound Card for Elecraft K3/K3S. In excellent condition. With firmware and manuals on CD, all cables needed are included. $249 shipped 50 States, PayPal, personal checks and Zelle accepted. Pics available. Please contact me off the forum at lladerman AT earthlink. DOT net Lou, W0FK ----- St. Louis, MO "The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From jas.brassell at gmail.com Wed Apr 24 19:51:03 2019 From: jas.brassell at gmail.com (James Brassell) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 19:51:03 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] For Sale: K-Line Message-ID: Want to sell K3S-F (100w Upgrade KPA3A-F, KANT3 E0248-F, TCXO KTCX03-1-F,KFL3A-2.8_2.7SWAP-F, KBPF3A-F General Coverage Rx, KFL3A-1.0K-IR-F, KFL3C-200-F, KFL3A-400-IR-F, KFL3B-FM-IR-F, K3 2nd RX KRX3A-F, KFL3A-2.8_2.7SWAP-F, KFL3A-1.0K-IR-F, KFL3C-200-F, KFL3A-400-IR-F, K3FLTATCH 5-pole filter matching to 40 Hz (For 200 Hz filters), KAT500 TO KPA500 cable E850463), P3 w/SVGA, KAT500, KPA500, and SP3 Speaker. All less than 2 years old and new in appearance and function. With manuals and interconnecting cables. Will not break up. Asking $7,000.00 plus shipping. Accept USPS money order only. No returns. From k2asp at kanafi.org Wed Apr 24 23:02:47 2019 From: k2asp at kanafi.org (Phil Kane) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 20:02:47 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error In-Reply-To: <09433121-ba3c-5393-cdcd-fbc58d47b213@kanafi.org> References: <09433121-ba3c-5393-cdcd-fbc58d47b213@kanafi.org> Message-ID: Problem (described below) with the WSJTX program (the "home" of FT8) trying to access K2. I didn't get an answer on the WSJTX Yahoo group so I'll try here. Configuration: Dell Laptop PC with iMic and RigBlaster Plus connected to Elecraft K2. Both the Elecraft and RigBlaster serial ports connected to the computer are 9-pin "RS-232" wired ports and all drivers are current. With PC running Windows 7, both MixW3 and WSJTX 2.0.0 using identical CAT control and audio settings ran without problems. After upgrading the computer to Win 10 with no other changes, MixW3 runs properly but WSJTX 2.0.0 and 2.0.1 did not. The error messages from Hamlib are: (Tune) "IO error while opening connection to rig" (Test CAT) "Communication timed out while opening connection to rig" In additions, the frequency readout on the WSJTX UI has reverted to all zeros. Are there "permission" settings in Win 10 that didn't exist in Win 7? Has anyone experienced this with Win 10 and found a solution? 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 >From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon From dhaines at bates.edu Thu Apr 25 10:45:26 2019 From: dhaines at bates.edu (David Haines) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 10:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error In-Reply-To: References: <09433121-ba3c-5393-cdcd-fbc58d47b213@kanafi.org> Message-ID: <294177bd-6584-5dc2-5975-7c9a5023842b@bates.edu> I'm having similar problems after going from Windows 7 to Windows 10.??? I'm using a KX3 on FT8 with WSJT-X, cheap $10 Sabrent USB Soundcard, nothing in the 9-pin RS-232 wired port of a Dell Inspiron 3670.? It all works well most of the time, but ... . Occasionally I? get one of the two error messages you show. My conjecture is that is has something to do with the COM ports, or shortage thereof.? The KX3 utility lists only one, COM3, when I try to download to the KX3.? It appears the COM3 port was taken over by another peripheral, maybe a printer?? Sometimes a reboot of the PC fixes it, but it would be nice to have a permanent solution. Can you communicate to the K2 using the K2 Utility? 73 de david, KC1DNY, in the Maine woods. elecraft KX3 s/n 8651 On 4/24/2019 11:02 PM, Phil Kane wrote: > Problem (described below) with the WSJTX program (the "home" of FT8) > trying to access K2. I didn't get an answer on the WSJTX Yahoo group so > I'll try here. > > Configuration: > > Dell Laptop PC with iMic and RigBlaster Plus connected to Elecraft K2. > Both the Elecraft and RigBlaster serial ports connected to the computer > are 9-pin "RS-232" wired ports and all drivers are current. > > With PC running Windows 7, both MixW3 and WSJTX 2.0.0 using identical > CAT control and audio settings ran without problems. > > After upgrading the computer to Win 10 with no other changes, MixW3 runs > properly but WSJTX 2.0.0 and 2.0.1 did not. The error messages from > Hamlib are: > > (Tune) "IO error while opening connection to rig" > (Test CAT) "Communication timed out while opening connection to rig" > > In additions, the frequency readout on the WSJTX UI has reverted to all > zeros. > > Are there "permission" settings in Win 10 that didn't exist in Win 7? > > Has anyone experienced this with Win 10 and found a solution? > > 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane > Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 > > From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest > Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From ko5v at earthlink.net Thu Apr 25 13:18:36 2019 From: ko5v at earthlink.net (Jim KO5V) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 11:18:36 -0600 (GMT-06:00) Subject: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error Message-ID: <93229704.7119.1556212717026@wamui-quail.atl.sa.earthlink.net> I have similar problems with my Win7 64 bit machines. It's tough to configure any additional COM ports, everything seems to eventually default to COM 3, and I can't make any changes "stick". Using only one "COM port"device, Sometimes just unplugging, and re-plugging that device, or stopping and restarting the desired program will make the computer see the connected device; sometimes,not. I asked my brother-in-law, a Windows systems guy, what he would do, and his reply was that he basically does what I've been doing, but then explained about some "advanced stuff" that he would help me with, but that I shouldn't try them myself... Make sure there's nothing else using the COM port, and see if the program will work (if you haven't already done that). Good Luck. 73, Jim KO5V From rmcgraw at blomand.net Thu Apr 25 13:26:18 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 12:26:18 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error In-Reply-To: <93229704.7119.1556212717026@wamui-quail.atl.sa.earthlink.net> References: <93229704.7119.1556212717026@wamui-quail.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Message-ID: With Windows, DEVICE MANAGER is your friend. Having it open and on screen, you can plug in devices or unplug devices and see, in real time, the port they are using. This will then be the port to assign in an application. Also check the parameters of the port to assure the device can communicate with the port. Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 25, 2019, at 12:18 PM, Jim KO5V wrote: > > I have similar problems with my Win7 64 bit machines. It's tough to configure any additional COM ports, everything seems to eventually default to COM 3, and I can't make any changes "stick". Using only one "COM port"device, Sometimes just unplugging, and re-plugging that device, or stopping and restarting the desired program will make the computer see the connected device; sometimes,not. > > I asked my brother-in-law, a Windows systems guy, what he would do, and his reply was that he basically does what I've been doing, but then explained about some "advanced stuff" that he would help me with, but that I shouldn't try them myself... > > Make sure there's nothing else using the COM port, and see if the program will work (if you haven't already done that). > > Good Luck. 73, Jim KO5V > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From ko5v at earthlink.net Thu Apr 25 13:53:49 2019 From: ko5v at earthlink.net (Jim KO5V) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 11:53:49 -0600 (GMT-06:00) Subject: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error Message-ID: <982009611.7414.1556214829928@wamui-quail.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Hi Bob, I use Device Manager, and I've done what you described. However, it doesn't always seem to work. Sometimes the device ignores the COM port selected in its program and D.M, sometimes the settings won't stay selected after I close the program. Do I need to use Device Manager each time I start a device? Thanks. 73, Jim KO5V -----Original Message----- >From: Bob McGraw K4TAX >Sent: Apr 25, 2019 11:26 AM >To: Jim KO5V >Cc: Elecraft List >Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error > >With Windows, DEVICE MANAGER is your friend. Having it open and on screen, you can plug in devices or unplug devices and see, in real time, the port they are using. This will then be the port to assign in an application. Also check the parameters of the port to assure the device can communicate with the port. > >Bob, K4TAX > > >Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 25, 2019, at 12:18 PM, Jim KO5V wrote: >> >> I have similar problems with my Win7 64 bit machines. It's tough to configure any additional COM ports, everything seems to eventually default to COM 3, and I can't make any changes "stick". Using only one "COM port"device, Sometimes just unplugging, and re-plugging that device, or stopping and restarting the desired program will make the computer see the connected device; sometimes,not. >> >> I asked my brother-in-law, a Windows systems guy, what he would do, and his reply was that he basically does what I've been doing, but then explained about some "advanced stuff" that he would help me with, but that I shouldn't try them myself... >> >> Make sure there's nothing else using the COM port, and see if the program will work (if you haven't already done that). >> >> Good Luck. 73, Jim KO5V >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > From rmcgraw at blomand.net Thu Apr 25 15:58:51 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 14:58:51 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error In-Reply-To: <982009611.7414.1556214829928@wamui-quail.atl.sa.earthlink.net> References: <982009611.7414.1556214829928@wamui-quail.atl.sa.earthlink.net> Message-ID: <0AC12B20-93B4-4969-B699-C4F0394BA627@blomand.net> Sometimes you can disconnect the cable and then plug it back in and Windows will recognize the device. In other cases you will need to power down the device and back up in order for Windows to recognize the device. Some assignments are sticky and will remain, while other cases it will be necessary to assign a port number every time. That is controlled in the device driver code and the way Windows handles port assignments. Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 25, 2019, at 12:53 PM, Jim KO5V wrote: > > Hi Bob, > > I use Device Manager, and I've done what you described. However, it doesn't always seem to work. Sometimes the device ignores the COM port selected in its program and D.M, sometimes the settings won't stay selected after I close the program. Do I need to use Device Manager each time I start a device? > > Thanks. 73, Jim KO5V > > > -----Original Message----- >> From: Bob McGraw K4TAX >> Sent: Apr 25, 2019 11:26 AM >> To: Jim KO5V >> Cc: Elecraft List >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error >> >> With Windows, DEVICE MANAGER is your friend. Having it open and on screen, you can plug in devices or unplug devices and see, in real time, the port they are using. This will then be the port to assign in an application. Also check the parameters of the port to assure the device can communicate with the port. >> >> Bob, K4TAX >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Apr 25, 2019, at 12:18 PM, Jim KO5V wrote: >>> >>> I have similar problems with my Win7 64 bit machines. It's tough to configure any additional COM ports, everything seems to eventually default to COM 3, and I can't make any changes "stick". Using only one "COM port"device, Sometimes just unplugging, and re-plugging that device, or stopping and restarting the desired program will make the computer see the connected device; sometimes,not. >>> >>> I asked my brother-in-law, a Windows systems guy, what he would do, and his reply was that he basically does what I've been doing, but then explained about some "advanced stuff" that he would help me with, but that I shouldn't try them myself... >>> >>> Make sure there's nothing else using the COM port, and see if the program will work (if you haven't already done that). >>> >>> Good Luck. 73, Jim KO5V >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >> >> > From dhaines at bates.edu Thu Apr 25 16:14:05 2019 From: dhaines at bates.edu (David Haines) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 16:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error In-Reply-To: <0AC12B20-93B4-4969-B699-C4F0394BA627@blomand.net> References: <982009611.7414.1556214829928@wamui-quail.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <0AC12B20-93B4-4969-B699-C4F0394BA627@blomand.net> Message-ID: <002dccce-97a4-a13e-07c0-549116ff9532@bates.edu> Thanks for the confirmation.? That's exactly consistent with my experience.? It's just too bad it has to be that way. david, KC1DNY n 4/25/2019 3:58 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > Sometimes you can disconnect the cable and then plug it back in and Windows will recognize the device. In other cases you will need to power down the device and back up in order for Windows to recognize the device. > > Some assignments are sticky and will remain, while other cases it will be necessary to assign a port number every time. That is controlled in the device driver code and the way Windows handles port assignments. > > Bob, K4TAX > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 25, 2019, at 12:53 PM, Jim KO5V wrote: >> >> Hi Bob, >> >> I use Device Manager, and I've done what you described. However, it doesn't always seem to work. Sometimes the device ignores the COM port selected in its program and D.M, sometimes the settings won't stay selected after I close the program. Do I need to use Device Manager each time I start a device? >> >> Thanks. 73, Jim KO5V >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Bob McGraw K4TAX >>> Sent: Apr 25, 2019 11:26 AM >>> To: Jim KO5V >>> Cc: Elecraft List >>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error >>> >>> With Windows, DEVICE MANAGER is your friend. Having it open and on screen, you can plug in devices or unplug devices and see, in real time, the port they are using. This will then be the port to assign in an application. Also check the parameters of the port to assure the device can communicate with the port. >>> >>> Bob, K4TAX >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Apr 25, 2019, at 12:18 PM, Jim KO5V wrote: >>>> >>>> I have similar problems with my Win7 64 bit machines. It's tough to configure any additional COM ports, everything seems to eventually default to COM 3, and I can't make any changes "stick". Using only one "COM port"device, Sometimes just unplugging, and re-plugging that device, or stopping and restarting the desired program will make the computer see the connected device; sometimes,not. >>>> >>>> I asked my brother-in-law, a Windows systems guy, what he would do, and his reply was that he basically does what I've been doing, but then explained about some "advanced stuff" that he would help me with, but that I shouldn't try them myself... >>>> >>>> Make sure there's nothing else using the COM port, and see if the program will work (if you haven't already done that). >>>> >>>> Good Luck. 73, Jim KO5V >>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>> >>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>> >>> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From donwilh at embarqmail.com Thu Apr 25 17:08:00 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 17:08:00 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error In-Reply-To: <002dccce-97a4-a13e-07c0-549116ff9532@bates.edu> References: <982009611.7414.1556214829928@wamui-quail.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <0AC12B20-93B4-4969-B699-C4F0394BA627@blomand.net> <002dccce-97a4-a13e-07c0-549116ff9532@bates.edu> Message-ID: Windows will usually assign the same port number IF you plug it into the same USB port. You can go into Properties for each device and change the port number - COM1 and COM2 are usually reserved for serial ports on the motherboard, even if no RS-232 ports are present on the board. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/25/2019 4:14 PM, David Haines wrote: > Thanks for the confirmation.? That's exactly consistent with my > experience.? It's just too bad it has to be that way. > > david, KC1DNY > > > n 4/25/2019 3:58 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: >> Sometimes you can disconnect the cable and then plug it back in and >> Windows will recognize the device. In other cases you will need to >> power down the device and back up in order for Windows to recognize >> the device. >> >> Some assignments are sticky and will remain, while other cases it will >> be necessary to assign a port number every time.? That is controlled >> in the device driver code and the way Windows handles port assignments. >> >> Bob, K4TAX >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Apr 25, 2019, at 12:53 PM, Jim KO5V wrote: >>> >>> Hi Bob, >>> >>> I use Device Manager, and I've done what you described. However, it >>> doesn't always seem to work. Sometimes the device ignores the COM >>> port selected in its program and D.M, sometimes the settings won't >>> stay selected after I close the program. Do I need to use Device >>> Manager each time I start a device? >>> >>> Thanks. 73, Jim? KO5V >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Bob McGraw K4TAX >>>> Sent: Apr 25, 2019 11:26 AM >>>> To: Jim KO5V >>>> Cc: Elecraft List >>>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error >>>> >>>> With Windows, DEVICE MANAGER is your friend.? Having it open and on >>>> screen, you can plug in devices or unplug devices and see, in real >>>> time, the port they are using.?? This will then be the port to >>>> assign in an application.? Also check the parameters of the port to >>>> assure the device can communicate with the port. >>>> >>>> Bob, K4TAX >>>> >>>> >>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>>> On Apr 25, 2019, at 12:18 PM, Jim KO5V wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have similar problems with my Win7 64 bit machines. It's tough to >>>>> configure any additional COM ports, everything seems to eventually >>>>> default to COM 3, and I can't make any changes "stick". Using only >>>>> one "COM port"device, Sometimes just unplugging, and re-plugging >>>>> that device, or stopping and restarting the desired program will >>>>> make the computer see the connected device; sometimes,not. >>>>> >>>>> I asked my brother-in-law, a Windows systems guy, what he would do, >>>>> and his reply was that he basically does what I've been doing, but >>>>> then explained about some "advanced stuff" that he would help me >>>>> with, but that I shouldn't try them myself... >>>>> >>>>> Make sure there's nothing else using the COM port, and see if the >>>>> program will work (if you haven't already done that). >>>>> >>>>> Good Luck. 73, Jim KO5V >>>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>>> >>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>>> >>>> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From k9jri at mac.com Thu Apr 25 17:14:05 2019 From: k9jri at mac.com (Michael Blake) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 17:14:05 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error In-Reply-To: References: <982009611.7414.1556214829928@wamui-quail.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <0AC12B20-93B4-4969-B699-C4F0394BA627@blomand.net> <002dccce-97a4-a13e-07c0-549116ff9532@bates.edu> Message-ID: <8D698F42-D422-40D5-A50B-55FC73CEF054@mac.com> My Window10 computer has 4 USB C ports and a 7 port USB3 hub. I have 5 different Elecraft USB Serial ports connected and they always receive the same com port number regardless of which USB port or HUB port they are plugged into. K3s, KAT500, KPA500, KX3, SG3 and other non Elecraft devices. I have never had them change as a result of a Windows upgrade. 73 - Mike - K9JRI > On Apr 25, 2019, at 5:08 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > > Windows will usually assign the same port number IF you plug it into the same USB port. > > You can go into Properties for each device and change the port number - COM1 and COM2 are usually reserved for serial ports on the motherboard, even if no RS-232 ports are present on the board. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/25/2019 4:14 PM, David Haines wrote: >> Thanks for the confirmation. That's exactly consistent with my experience. It's just too bad it has to be that way. >> david, KC1DNY >> n 4/25/2019 3:58 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: >>> Sometimes you can disconnect the cable and then plug it back in and Windows will recognize the device. In other cases you will need to power down the device and back up in order for Windows to recognize the device. >>> >>> Some assignments are sticky and will remain, while other cases it will be necessary to assign a port number every time. That is controlled in the device driver code and the way Windows handles port assignments. >>> >>> Bob, K4TAX >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Apr 25, 2019, at 12:53 PM, Jim KO5V wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Bob, >>>> >>>> I use Device Manager, and I've done what you described. However, it doesn't always seem to work. Sometimes the device ignores the COM port selected in its program and D.M, sometimes the settings won't stay selected after I close the program. Do I need to use Device Manager each time I start a device? >>>> >>>> Thanks. 73, Jim KO5V >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Bob McGraw K4TAX >>>>> Sent: Apr 25, 2019 11:26 AM >>>>> To: Jim KO5V >>>>> Cc: Elecraft List >>>>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error >>>>> >>>>> With Windows, DEVICE MANAGER is your friend. Having it open and on screen, you can plug in devices or unplug devices and see, in real time, the port they are using. This will then be the port to assign in an application. Also check the parameters of the port to assure the device can communicate with the port. >>>>> >>>>> Bob, K4TAX >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 25, 2019, at 12:18 PM, Jim KO5V wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> I have similar problems with my Win7 64 bit machines. It's tough to configure any additional COM ports, everything seems to eventually default to COM 3, and I can't make any changes "stick". Using only one "COM port"device, Sometimes just unplugging, and re-plugging that device, or stopping and restarting the desired program will make the computer see the connected device; sometimes,not. >>>>>> >>>>>> I asked my brother-in-law, a Windows systems guy, what he would do, and his reply was that he basically does what I've been doing, but then explained about some "advanced stuff" that he would help me with, but that I shouldn't try them myself... >>>>>> >>>>>> Make sure there's nothing else using the COM port, and see if the program will work (if you haven't already done that). >>>>>> >>>>>> Good Luck. 73, Jim KO5V >>>>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>>>> >>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jas.brassell at gmail.com Thu Apr 25 21:13:51 2019 From: jas.brassell at gmail.com (James Brassell) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:13:51 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K-Line For Sale Rescinded Message-ID: Problem with the P3 resolved with the help of Eric. When an owner of the company calls to assist, that is beyond the pale. I don't recall anyone ever having a corporate officer from Kenwood, Yaesu, or Icom call to assist in a problem resolution. So, I am withdrawing my for sale offer for my K-Line. This time I will remember to include my name and call sign. Thanks for reading. 73, Jim K4ZMV From rmcgraw at blomand.net Thu Apr 25 22:57:59 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 21:57:59 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error In-Reply-To: <8D698F42-D422-40D5-A50B-55FC73CEF054@mac.com> References: <982009611.7414.1556214829928@wamui-quail.atl.sa.earthlink.net> <0AC12B20-93B4-4969-B699-C4F0394BA627@blomand.net> <002dccce-97a4-a13e-07c0-549116ff9532@bates.edu> <8D698F42-D422-40D5-A50B-55FC73CEF054@mac.com> Message-ID: <0b8aa684-90c8-f61b-44f4-a9ab6e9a59b5@blomand.net> Interesting. Using Windows 10 Pro I have one radio {model/brand} if I plug it in, set the application to communicate with the port as defined in Device Manager, all is well.? I can then turn the radio off and then back on, changing no cables or ports, and find the same application will not communicate with the radio.? Then I look at Device Manager and find that the port number has changed.? I change the port number in the application and all is well........until next time. And with another radio {Elecraft K3S}, I do not find that changing the physical USB connection on the computer will cause the communication port number to change.? Hence the port assignment is sticky. This says to me all USB drivers are not created equal.?? And likewise, I've experienced no issues being the result of Windows 10 updates. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/25/2019 4:14 PM, Michael Blake via Elecraft wrote: > My Window10 computer has 4 USB C ports and a 7 port USB3 hub. I have 5 different Elecraft USB Serial ports connected and they always receive the same com port number regardless of which USB port or HUB port they are plugged into. K3s, KAT500, KPA500, KX3, SG3 and other non Elecraft devices. > > I have never had them change as a result of a Windows upgrade. > > 73 - Mike - K9JRI > > > From nick at n6ol.us Thu Apr 25 23:15:51 2019 From: nick at n6ol.us (Nicklas Johnson) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 20:15:51 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM Message-ID: I'm trying to track down a pretty obnoxious audio problem on AM, and to a much lesser extent on SSB. On transmit I get an audio buzz with the highest spikes on 350, 470, and 830 Hz. At first I thought I had a ground loop hum, so I disconnected everything from the K3s except the antenna and switched the power over to battery only. It made no difference. Other things that don't make any difference: lowering the mic/line input level to 0, changing the mic input among front panel, rear panel, line-in, changing frequency, changing output power all the way down to 0.1w, turning off all the lights and shutting off any other nearby equipment in the room, running into a dummy load with the receiver nearby. Physically touching the case or grabbing the barrel of the front panel mic connector actually does cause the buzz to get just a little softer. I generally use solar/battery power, though my ground is bonded to my utility ground. Any other ideas? I'm running out of them. Nick -- *N6OL* Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not worth supporting. From ghyoungman at gmail.com Thu Apr 25 23:20:27 2019 From: ghyoungman at gmail.com (Grant Youngman) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 23:20:27 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0B4CC3EF-34C1-47C0-A59F-35278AB07365@gmail.com> Microphone? Or anything in between the mic and the radio, if there is anything? Grant NQ5T K3 #2091 KX3 #8342 > > > Any other ideas? I'm running out of them. > > Nick > > -- > *N6OL* > Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it > real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not > worth supporting. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From nick at n6ol.us Thu Apr 25 23:26:05 2019 From: nick at n6ol.us (Nicklas Johnson) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 20:26:05 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: <0B4CC3EF-34C1-47C0-A59F-35278AB07365@gmail.com> References: <0B4CC3EF-34C1-47C0-A59F-35278AB07365@gmail.com> Message-ID: That was my second thought, but then I disconnected everything, including the microphone, and it made no difference. Nick On Thu, Apr 25, 2019, 8:20 PM Grant Youngman wrote: > Microphone? Or anything in between the mic and the radio, if there is > anything? > > Grant NQ5T > K3 #2091 KX3 #8342 > > > > > > > Any other ideas? I'm running out of them. > > > > Nick > > > > -- > > *N6OL* > > Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make > it > > real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not > > worth supporting. > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Fri Apr 26 01:10:43 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 22:10:43 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On 4/25/2019 8:15 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > Physically touching the case or grabbing the barrel of the front panel mic > connector actually does cause the buzz to get just a little softer. I suspect either a bonding problem or a problem with the wiring of the mic. > I generally use solar/battery power, though my ground is bonded to my > utility ground. I suggest that you carefully study either N0AX's recent ARRL book on grounding and bonding, or the slides for talks I've given at Visalia and Pacifion. 73, Jim K9YC From nick at n6ol.us Fri Apr 26 02:27:57 2019 From: nick at n6ol.us (Nicklas Johnson) Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2019 23:27:57 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Again, the problem persists with all inputs completely disconnected and the mic gain set at 0. And running solely on a battery into a dummy load. Nick On Thu, Apr 25, 2019, 10:10 PM Jim Brown wrote: > On 4/25/2019 8:15 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > > Physically touching the case or grabbing the barrel of the front panel > mic > > connector actually does cause the buzz to get just a little softer. > > I suspect either a bonding problem or a problem with the wiring of the mic. > > > I generally use solar/battery power, though my ground is bonded to my > > utility ground. > > I suggest that you carefully study either N0AX's recent ARRL book on > grounding and bonding, or the slides for talks I've given at Visalia and > Pacifion. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From kg9hfrank at gmail.com Fri Apr 26 08:36:41 2019 From: kg9hfrank at gmail.com (Frank Krozel) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 07:36:41 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Filters for K3 Message-ID: On weekends here in the Midwest there are many AM nets (as well as the normal 3.880 Nets) that I like to listen to. I am curious as a CW guy, I would like to not take away from my already compliment of filters, 500, 200Hz to put in 6 and 13kHz filters, thinking of adding just the 13kHz filter. I also do 52.525. How would the 13kHz filter work for listening to AM? I assume I can start with that filter and use the variable to neck it down? Most of the signals are above S-9 that I listen to. de KG9H, Frank From neilz at techie.com Fri Apr 26 09:00:51 2019 From: neilz at techie.com (Neil Zampella) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 09:00:51 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error In-Reply-To: References: <09433121-ba3c-5393-cdcd-fbc58d47b213@kanafi.org> Message-ID: Phil, I've got my K2/100? running under Win10 using DXLabs Commander.??? I could never get WSJT-X running the K2 directly using the built in Hamlib settings, or with Omnirig or Flrig.??????? It works fine, and I was able to create custom controls for Commander to adjust the power if I'm running remotely using VNC. Neil, KN3ILZ On 4/24/2019 11:02 PM, Phil Kane wrote: > Problem (described below) with the WSJTX program (the "home" of FT8) > trying to access K2. I didn't get an answer on the WSJTX Yahoo group so > I'll try here. > > Configuration: > > Dell Laptop PC with iMic and RigBlaster Plus connected to Elecraft K2. > Both the Elecraft and RigBlaster serial ports connected to the computer > are 9-pin "RS-232" wired ports and all drivers are current. > > With PC running Windows 7, both MixW3 and WSJTX 2.0.0 using identical > CAT control and audio settings ran without problems. > > After upgrading the computer to Win 10 with no other changes, MixW3 runs > properly but WSJTX 2.0.0 and 2.0.1 did not. The error messages from > Hamlib are: > > (Tune) "IO error while opening connection to rig" > (Test CAT) "Communication timed out while opening connection to rig" > > In additions, the frequency readout on the WSJTX UI has reverted to all > zeros. > > Are there "permission" settings in Win 10 that didn't exist in Win 7? > > Has anyone experienced this with Win 10 and found a solution? > > 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane > Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 > > >From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest > Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon > --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From rmcgraw at blomand.net Fri Apr 26 09:16:18 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:16:18 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Filters for K3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I find the 6KHz very adequate for AM, both RX and TX. Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 26, 2019, at 7:36 AM, Frank Krozel wrote: > > On weekends here in the Midwest there are many AM nets (as well as the normal 3.880 Nets) that I like to listen to. > I am curious as a CW guy, I would like to not take away from my already compliment of filters, 500, 200Hz to put in 6 and 13kHz filters, thinking of adding just the 13kHz filter. I also do 52.525. > How would the 13kHz filter work for listening to AM? I assume I can start with that filter and use the variable to neck it down? Most of the signals are above S-9 that I listen to. > de KG9H, Frank > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From w2blc at nycap.rr.com Fri Apr 26 09:19:23 2019 From: w2blc at nycap.rr.com (Bill) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 09:19:23 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - DVR installation question Message-ID: <7eab21ca-532d-65dd-dcf2-bd6da26bd775@nycap.rr.com> What is entailed in installing a DVR into the K3? Sadly, I have to Move the KPA-500 and a PalStar manual (large) tuner before I can even get to the K3, For me, this is a big job. So thought I'd ask before I blindly jump into this. Bill W2BLC From ghyoungman at gmail.com Fri Apr 26 09:23:32 2019 From: ghyoungman at gmail.com (Grant Youngman) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 09:23:32 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - DVR installation question In-Reply-To: <7eab21ca-532d-65dd-dcf2-bd6da26bd775@nycap.rr.com> References: <7eab21ca-532d-65dd-dcf2-bd6da26bd775@nycap.rr.com> Message-ID: It?s fairly involved to add after the fact. Not difficult ? but considerably more than ?pull the cover, plug it in?. https://ftp.elecraft.com/K3S/Manuals%20Downloads/E740130%20KDVR3%20Option%20Installation%20Rev%20C.pdf Grant NQ5T K3 #2091 KX3 #8342 > On Apr 26, 2019, at 9:19 AM, Bill wrote: > > What is entailed in installing a DVR into the K3? Sadly, I have to Move the KPA-500 and a PalStar manual (large) tuner before I can even get to the K3, For me, this is a big job. So thought I'd ask before I blindly jump into this. > > Bill W2BLC > From donwilh at embarqmail.com Fri Apr 26 10:01:02 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Filters for K3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1338afc5-97af-1833-b829-c049e38a4680@embarqmail.com> Frank, You can certainly use the 13kHz filter for listening to AM - even for transmitting. It also works for FM as well, so the 6 kHz filter does not have to be present. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/26/2019 8:36 AM, Frank Krozel wrote: > On weekends here in the Midwest there are many AM nets (as well as the normal 3.880 Nets) that I like to listen to. > I am curious as a CW guy, I would like to not take away from my already compliment of filters, 500, 200Hz to put in 6 and 13kHz filters, thinking of adding just the 13kHz filter. I also do 52.525. > How would the 13kHz filter work for listening to AM? I assume I can start with that filter and use the variable to neck it down? Most of the signals are above S-9 that I listen to. From kg9hfrank at gmail.com Fri Apr 26 10:02:05 2019 From: kg9hfrank at gmail.com (Frank Krozel) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 09:02:05 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Filters for K3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: OK thank you everyone fo your input Sincerely, Frank Krozel t: 1-630-924-1600 frank at electronicinstrument.com BSEE, AASEET, FCC Lic.# PG-18-19178, KG9H Electronic Instrument Associates - Central, Inc. ...since 1971 w: www.electronicinstrument.com d/l our linecard at http://www.electronicinstrument.com/lc.pdf > On Apr 26, 2019, at 8:16 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > > I find the 6KHz very adequate for AM, both RX and TX. > > Bob, K4TAX > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 26, 2019, at 7:36 AM, Frank Krozel wrote: >> >> On weekends here in the Midwest there are many AM nets (as well as the normal 3.880 Nets) that I like to listen to. >> I am curious as a CW guy, I would like to not take away from my already compliment of filters, 500, 200Hz to put in 6 and 13kHz filters, thinking of adding just the 13kHz filter. I also do 52.525. >> How would the 13kHz filter work for listening to AM? I assume I can start with that filter and use the variable to neck it down? Most of the signals are above S-9 that I listen to. >> de KG9H, Frank >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > From w2blc at nycap.rr.com Fri Apr 26 10:14:59 2019 From: w2blc at nycap.rr.com (Bill) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:14:59 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - DVR installation question In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4427db0b-5ea7-553d-04e8-47847a3e858e@nycap.rr.com> Grant: thanks for the link to the install manual. WOW!? I don't see that in my future - too many places for errors. My K3 is not broken and I don't want to break it. Thanks again. Of course, I could always sent the K3 out and have all the updates made and the DVR installed. But, all I operate on is 75 meters these days and really see no need for the updates. Again, the K3 is working wonderful. Bill W2BLC From nick at n6ol.us Fri Apr 26 11:43:31 2019 From: nick at n6ol.us (Nicklas Johnson) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 08:43:31 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: This morning just for yuks, I also temporarily disconnected the ground from the rig entirely while also connecting only to a dummy load, so there could be no path to ground at all, let alone multiple paths. No change. I guess the next things I'll probably try are a full factory reset, and then perhaps popping it open to make sure nothing has come unseated. But first I'll drop a line to Elecraft support too. I've seen a number of people post about similar problems that either magically resolved themselves or ended up being a fault on the audio board. Nick On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 23:27, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > Again, the problem persists with all inputs completely disconnected and > the mic gain set at 0. And running solely on a battery into a dummy load. > > Nick > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2019, 10:10 PM Jim Brown > wrote: > >> On 4/25/2019 8:15 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >> > Physically touching the case or grabbing the barrel of the front panel >> mic >> > connector actually does cause the buzz to get just a little softer. >> >> I suspect either a bonding problem or a problem with the wiring of the >> mic. >> >> > I generally use solar/battery power, though my ground is bonded to my >> > utility ground. >> >> I suggest that you carefully study either N0AX's recent ARRL book on >> grounding and bonding, or the slides for talks I've given at Visalia and >> Pacifion. >> >> 73, Jim K9YC >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > -- *N6OL* Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not worth supporting. From rmcgraw at blomand.net Fri Apr 26 12:49:57 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:49:57 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <0281d73c-42bf-9d56-ad93-8bf1df0d0185@blomand.net> I did listen and look at my K3S on my SDR receiver in AM mode. I do find there is a small amount of hum on the carrier.? Then switching to LSB, I do not find the hum present. You may want to check the settings of your TX EQ. ? If you have any low frequency boost, that will contribute to the level of the hum. ? My operating values are: 50 Hz = -16 dB , 100 Hz = -16 dB , 200 Hz = -16 dB , 400 Hz = -6 dB, everything above that is set to 0 dB or flat.? The mike is a Shure SM-58. In AM mode the hum is noted at 120 Hz, 240 Hz, and 360 Hz, all multiples of the 60 Hz line.? At the same time, the hum level of the individual frequencies, worst case,? is some 40 dB below 100% modulation.? Some are 50 dB below 100% modulation with the worst case being 120 Hz. ?? In working several AM stations over the past year or so, I've not had any comments regarding hum on the carrier.??? These tests were done with MIC level set to 0 and COM level set to 0.?? Everything else normal and connected to the radio. ? Different power levels, mike level and comp level? made no difference in the amplitude of the hum components. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/26/2019 10:43 AM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > This morning just for yuks, I also temporarily disconnected the ground from > the rig entirely while also connecting only to a dummy load, so there could > be no path to ground at all, let alone multiple paths. No change. > > I guess the next things I'll probably try are a full factory reset, and > then perhaps popping it open to make sure nothing has come unseated. But > first I'll drop a line to Elecraft support too. I've seen a number of > people post about similar problems that either magically resolved > themselves or ended up being a fault on the audio board. > > Nick > > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 23:27, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > >> Again, the problem persists with all inputs completely disconnected and >> the mic gain set at 0. And running solely on a battery into a dummy load. >> >> Nick >> >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019, 10:10 PM Jim Brown >> wrote: >> >>> On 4/25/2019 8:15 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >>>> Physically touching the case or grabbing the barrel of the front panel >>> mic >>>> connector actually does cause the buzz to get just a little softer. >>> I suspect either a bonding problem or a problem with the wiring of the >>> mic. >>> >>>> I generally use solar/battery power, though my ground is bonded to my >>>> utility ground. >>> I suggest that you carefully study either N0AX's recent ARRL book on >>> grounding and bonding, or the slides for talks I've given at Visalia and >>> Pacifion. >>> >>> 73, Jim K9YC >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> From a.durbin at msn.com Fri Apr 26 13:08:31 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:08:31 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such Message-ID: " When an owner of the company calls to assist, that is beyond the pale. " I wonder if that is what you really thought. https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/beyond-the-pale.html Maybe it means something completely different in other lands. 73, Andy, k3wyc From kg9hfrank at gmail.com Fri Apr 26 13:21:23 2019 From: kg9hfrank at gmail.com (Frank Krozel) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 12:21:23 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <5CA276D4-2474-4955-B32A-8E93FED75D7C@gmail.com> I would be floored and would take a blank paper and a good pen. De KG9H > On Apr 26, 2019, at 12:08 PM, Andy Durbin wrote: > > " When an owner of the company calls to assist, that is beyond the pale. " > > I wonder if that is what you really thought. > > https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/beyond-the-pale.html > > Maybe it means something completely different in other lands. > > 73, > Andy, k3wyc > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From n6kr at elecraft.com Fri Apr 26 13:29:49 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:29:49 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such In-Reply-To: <5CA276D4-2474-4955-B32A-8E93FED75D7C@gmail.com> References: <5CA276D4-2474-4955-B32A-8E93FED75D7C@gmail.com> Message-ID: "Beyond the pale" is an infrequently used idiomatic expression (at least in the U.S.), probably misunderstood by many. I believe it is used in a negative sense for the most part, but clearly that isn't what the writer meant. Some English words have become completely useless in practice, like "semiannual" and "biannual," either of which can mean "twice a year" or "every other year." In fact if you look up the definition for one, you often see the other shown as a synonym. Wayne N6KR > On Apr 26, 2019, at 10:21 AM, Frank Krozel wrote: > > I would be floored and would take a blank paper and a good pen. > > De KG9H > > >> On Apr 26, 2019, at 12:08 PM, Andy Durbin wrote: >> >> " When an owner of the company calls to assist, that is beyond the pale. " >> >> I wonder if that is what you really thought. >> >> https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/beyond-the-pale.html >> >> Maybe it means something completely different in other lands. >> >> 73, >> Andy, k3wy From Andy at rickham.net Fri Apr 26 13:38:35 2019 From: Andy at rickham.net (Andy McMullin) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:38:35 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such In-Reply-To: References: <5CA276D4-2474-4955-B32A-8E93FED75D7C@gmail.com> Message-ID: <3DD5B73D-D795-4431-BC1E-55F19DE79122@rickham.net> Beyond the pale - outside the safe area protected by the British in Ireland. Normally taken to mean immoral, dangerous and probably obscene. Sent from my iPhone > On 26 Apr 2019, at 18:29, Wayne Burdick wrote: > > "Beyond the pale" is an infrequently used idiomatic expression (at least in the U.S.), probably misunderstood by many. I believe it is used in a negative sense for the most part, but clearly that isn't what the writer meant. > > Some English words have become completely useless in practice, like "semiannual" and "biannual," either of which can mean "twice a year" or "every other year." In fact if you look up the definition for one, you often see the other shown as a synonym. > > Wayne > N6KR > > > > >> On Apr 26, 2019, at 10:21 AM, Frank Krozel wrote: >> >> I would be floored and would take a blank paper and a good pen. >> >> De KG9H >> >> >>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 12:08 PM, Andy Durbin wrote: >>> >>> " When an owner of the company calls to assist, that is beyond the pale. " >>> >>> I wonder if that is what you really thought. >>> >>> https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/beyond-the-pale.html >>> >>> Maybe it means something completely different in other lands. >>> >>> 73, >>> Andy, k3wy > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jas.brassell at gmail.com Fri Apr 26 13:43:46 2019 From: jas.brassell at gmail.com (James Brassell) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 13:43:46 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such In-Reply-To: <3DD5B73D-D795-4431-BC1E-55F19DE79122@rickham.net> References: <5CA276D4-2474-4955-B32A-8E93FED75D7C@gmail.com> <3DD5B73D-D795-4431-BC1E-55F19DE79122@rickham.net> Message-ID: Andy, Wayne was right, I meant that Eric had gone way beyond what was expected, in a good way. My understanding of the phrase was it meant beyond bad things and into the good. Sorry if you saw it otherwise. Guess I better watch out for the wordsmiths. 73, Jim K4ZMV On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 1:39 PM Andy McMullin via Elecraft < elecraft at mailman.qth.net> wrote: > Beyond the pale - outside the safe area protected by the British in > Ireland. Normally taken to mean immoral, dangerous and probably obscene. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 26 Apr 2019, at 18:29, Wayne Burdick wrote: > > > > "Beyond the pale" is an infrequently used idiomatic expression (at least > in the U.S.), probably misunderstood by many. I believe it is used in a > negative sense for the most part, but clearly that isn't what the writer > meant. > > > > Some English words have become completely useless in practice, like > "semiannual" and "biannual," either of which can mean "twice a year" or > "every other year." In fact if you look up the definition for one, you > often see the other shown as a synonym. > > > > Wayne > > N6KR > > > > > > > > > >> On Apr 26, 2019, at 10:21 AM, Frank Krozel wrote: > >> > >> I would be floored and would take a blank paper and a good pen. > >> > >> De KG9H > >> > >> > >>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 12:08 PM, Andy Durbin wrote: > >>> > >>> " When an owner of the company calls to assist, that is beyond the > pale. " > >>> > >>> I wonder if that is what you really thought. > >>> > >>> https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/beyond-the-pale.html > >>> > >>> Maybe it means something completely different in other lands. > >>> > >>> 73, > >>> Andy, k3wy > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Fri Apr 26 13:52:13 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:52:13 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Filters for K3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: If you don't want to transmit but only listen, SSB mode works just fine with 2.7 or 2.8 kHz filters. 73, Jim K9YC On 4/26/2019 6:16 AM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > I find the 6KHz very adequate for AM, both RX and TX. From n6kr at elecraft.com Fri Apr 26 14:01:15 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:01:15 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such In-Reply-To: References: <5CA276D4-2474-4955-B32A-8E93FED75D7C@gmail.com> <3DD5B73D-D795-4431-BC1E-55F19DE79122@rickham.net> Message-ID: <9E0C2BC2-9349-4689-9453-D44B77BADD38@elecraft.com> > On Apr 26, 2019, at 10:43 AM, James Brassell wrote: > > Andy, > > Wayne was right, I meant that Eric had gone way beyond what was expected, in a good way. My understanding of the phrase was it meant beyond bad things and into the good. Sorry if you saw it otherwise. Guess I better watch out for the wordsmiths. Or worse, wordsmith wannabees, like me :) Wayne From k2asp at kanafi.org Fri Apr 26 14:22:17 2019 From: k2asp at kanafi.org (Phil Kane) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:22:17 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such In-Reply-To: <9E0C2BC2-9349-4689-9453-D44B77BADD38@elecraft.com> References: <5CA276D4-2474-4955-B32A-8E93FED75D7C@gmail.com> <3DD5B73D-D795-4431-BC1E-55F19DE79122@rickham.net> <9E0C2BC2-9349-4689-9453-D44B77BADD38@elecraft.com> Message-ID: <7e519f9d-8e47-441a-e2a7-9361c3733b30@kanafi.org> On 4/26/2019 11:01 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote: >> Wayne was right, I meant that Eric had gone way beyond what was >> expected, in a good way. My understanding of the phrase was it >> meant beyond bad things and into the good. Sorry if you saw it >> otherwise. Guess I better watch out for the wordsmiths. > > Or worse, wordsmith wannabees, like me :) > But but but.... as I pound into the engineers working for me - be very careful with the stuff that you commit to reports and papers - we may be held to exactly that in the case of disputes. Color me nitpicker.... :)-- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 VP - General Counsel & Engineering Manager CSI Telecommunications, Inc. - Consulting Engineers San Francisco, CA - Beaverton, OR From lists at subich.com Fri Apr 26 16:01:25 2019 From: lists at subich.com (Joe Subich, W4TV) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:01:25 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Filters for K3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <92971950-2b16-2817-86e1-df4bb150f5d9@subich.com> 13 KHz filter works very well for AM. It provides +/- 6.5 KHz at IF which is plenty for even the guys with converted broadcast rigs that are generally +/- 5 KHz. The K3/K3S DSP and audio brick wall filters will limit the highest audio frequency to around 4.5 KHz but you can always use the DSP to further reduce the highest audio frequency to 2.8 - 3 KHz if needed to limit QRM. You can further reduce QRM by using the 2.7 or 2.8 KHz filter in synch mode to demodulate either just the upper sideband or lower sideband if one sideband is being clobbered by QRM. 73, ... Joe, W4TV On 2019-04-26 8:36 AM, Frank Krozel wrote: > On weekends here in the Midwest there are many AM nets (as well as the normal 3.880 Nets) that I like to listen to. > I am curious as a CW guy, I would like to not take away from my already compliment of filters, 500, 200Hz to put in 6 and 13kHz filters, thinking of adding just the 13kHz filter. I also do 52.525. > How would the 13kHz filter work for listening to AM? I assume I can start with that filter and use the variable to neck it down? Most of the signals are above S-9 that I listen to. > de KG9H, Frank > From kz5d.arts at gmail.com Fri Apr 26 16:20:08 2019 From: kz5d.arts at gmail.com (Art Suberbielle) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:20:08 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] KPAK3AUX cable length Message-ID: Hi all, Does Elecraft sell a longer version of the standard cable? I need about 3 more feet. As an alternative, can 2 of these cables be used in series to provide the extra length without creating any timing issues for the KPA1500? Thanks & 73, Art KZ5D From donovanf at starpower.net Fri Apr 26 16:34:23 2019 From: donovanf at starpower.net (donovanf at starpower.net) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:34:23 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such In-Reply-To: <5CA276D4-2474-4955-B32A-8E93FED75D7C@gmail.com> Message-ID: <2070514601.9794071.1556310863429.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> Just one more case of "no good deed goes unpunished!" The "punishment" was the innocent misuse of an infrequently used phrase when the writer clearly intended to praise Eric for far exceeding customer expectations. Not to belabor the point, but "beyond the pale" means exactly the opposite of what the writer intended: "Outside the bounds of morality, acceptable behavior or good judgement" 73 Frank W3LPL > On Apr 26, 2019, at 12:08 PM, Andy Durbin wrote: > > " When an owner of the company calls to assist, that is beyond the pale. " > > I wonder if that is what you really thought. > > https://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/beyond-the-pale.html > > Maybe it means something completely different in other lands. > > 73, > Andy, k3wyc > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From w5jr.lists at gmail.com Fri Apr 26 16:42:05 2019 From: w5jr.lists at gmail.com (Mike - W5JR) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:42:05 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KAT & KPA 500 Remote by Elecraft Message-ID: <0479D54E-AE27-4AD1-9EAF-9C0294E5C757@gmail.com> I?ve poked around looking for a solution, but nothing surfaced. I have the two programs loading on startup, but also need them to go directly into hosting mode. Today, I have to remotely access the shack computer to manually engage ?Start Hosting Remote?. Is there a way others have found? tnx Mike / W5JR Alpharetta GA From va3mw at portcredit.net Fri Apr 26 16:45:26 2019 From: va3mw at portcredit.net (Michael Walker) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KAT & KPA 500 Remote by Elecraft In-Reply-To: <0479D54E-AE27-4AD1-9EAF-9C0294E5C757@gmail.com> References: <0479D54E-AE27-4AD1-9EAF-9C0294E5C757@gmail.com> Message-ID: Not that I have been able to find after 5 or 6 years of using the KPA500 remotely. Mike va3mw On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 4:42 PM Mike - W5JR wrote: > I?ve poked around looking for a solution, but nothing surfaced. > > I have the two programs loading on startup, but also need them to go > directly into hosting mode. Today, I have to remotely access the shack > computer to manually engage ?Start Hosting Remote?. > > Is there a way others have found? > > tnx > Mike / W5JR > Alpharetta GA > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From kevin at ve3syb.ca Fri Apr 26 16:46:57 2019 From: kevin at ve3syb.ca (Kevin Cozens) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:46:57 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such In-Reply-To: References: <5CA276D4-2474-4955-B32A-8E93FED75D7C@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20f219b3-6d27-d08d-1a1d-a38c8ae1f482@ve3syb.ca> On 2019-04-26 1:29 p.m., Wayne Burdick wrote: > Some English words have become completely useless in practice, like > "semiannual" and "biannual," either of which can mean "twice a year" or > "every other year." In fact if you look up the definition for one, you > often see the other shown as a synonym. The problem is due to people using words without understanding heir meaning. There should be no confusion between semiannual and biannual. semi means half, and bi is two. If you want to really find out how messed up is the English language and the definitions of words, start solving cryptic crossword puzzles. Some words have three completely different sets of meanings. -- Cheers! Kevin. http://www.ve3syb.ca/ | "Nerds make the shiny things that https://www.patreon.com/KevinCozens | distract the mouth-breathers, and | that's why we're powerful" Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | #include | --Chris Hardwick From Andy at rickham.net Fri Apr 26 16:53:03 2019 From: Andy at rickham.net (Andy McMullin) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 21:53:03 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such In-Reply-To: <20f219b3-6d27-d08d-1a1d-a38c8ae1f482@ve3syb.ca> References: <5CA276D4-2474-4955-B32A-8E93FED75D7C@gmail.com> <20f219b3-6d27-d08d-1a1d-a38c8ae1f482@ve3syb.ca> Message-ID: <513EF570-A627-4535-9CC7-A72B486FB479@rickham.net> You are so right. So many people seem to guess what words or phrases mean without bothering to determine what the rest of society agrees that they mean. Then they expect you to understand their personal interpretation. However, I?d add that it?s also useful to remember George Bernard Shaw and his ?two countries divided by a common language?. Try suggesting a ?fag break? to workers in the USA (as I did one coffee time in the 1970?s). Sent from my iPhone > On 26 Apr 2019, at 21:46, Kevin Cozens wrote: > >> On 2019-04-26 1:29 p.m., Wayne Burdick wrote: >> Some English words have become completely useless in practice, like >> "semiannual" and "biannual," either of which can mean "twice a year" or >> "every other year." In fact if you look up the definition for one, you >> often see the other shown as a synonym. > > The problem is due to people using words without understanding heir meaning. There should be no confusion between semiannual and biannual. semi means half, and bi is two. > > If you want to really find out how messed up is the English language and the definitions of words, start solving cryptic crossword puzzles. Some words have three completely different sets of meanings. > > -- > Cheers! > > Kevin. > > http://www.ve3syb.ca/ | "Nerds make the shiny things that > https://www.patreon.com/KevinCozens | distract the mouth-breathers, and > | that's why we're powerful" > Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | > #include | --Chris Hardwick > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From edauer at law.du.edu Fri Apr 26 17:15:57 2019 From: edauer at law.du.edu (Dauer, Edward) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 21:15:57 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Of Words and Such - Even though Beyond the OT Pale Message-ID: It's from an earlier meaning of the word pale, which meant a specific region or area within a defined boundary. Hence the denotation of beyond the pale is "outside the boundary." Another current use of the word's earlier meaning is the phrase "The Pale of Settlement," which meant and to historians still means a bounded region in Russia into which Russian Jews were herded and allowed to live, more or less, during the generation before the first World War. I agree with Wayne that today the connotation is usually negative; and I also understood the user to mean it literally and so not negatively at all. Ted, KN1CBR _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ Message: 13 Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:29:49 -0700 From: Wayne Burdick To: Frank Krozel Cc: Elecraft Reflector , Andy Durbin Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Of words and such Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii "Beyond the pale" is an infrequently used idiomatic expression (at least in the U.S.), probably misunderstood by many. I believe it is used in a negative sense for the most part, but clearly that isn't what the writer meant. Some English words have become completely useless in practice, like "semiannual" and "biannual," either of which can mean "twice a year" or "every other year." In fact if you look up the definition for one, you often see the other shown as a synonym. Wayne N6KR From donwilh at embarqmail.com Fri Apr 26 17:25:44 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:25:44 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such In-Reply-To: <513EF570-A627-4535-9CC7-A72B486FB479@rickham.net> References: <5CA276D4-2474-4955-B32A-8E93FED75D7C@gmail.com> <20f219b3-6d27-d08d-1a1d-a38c8ae1f482@ve3syb.ca> <513EF570-A627-4535-9CC7-A72B486FB479@rickham.net> Message-ID: It likely depends on which area of the US you are in. I don't know about the current vernacular, but where I grew up in Central Eastern Ohio in the 1950s and 1960s, cigarettes were known as "fags", and a 'fag break' would be a perfectly acceptable expression. I once heard a broadcast from KDKA in Pittsburg, PA where several language expressions that were unique to that area were cited. The one that sticks in my mind is "chuckle" referring to a pothole in the road. A lot depends on the context. I remember my Grandmother referring to "Go dowm celler to do the wershing" on Mondays. Even within the USA, there is a wide variety of local expressions like that. When I first moved to NC, I did a 2nd take the first time I heard someone say they had to "carry their Mother to the doctor"! 73, Don W3FPR On 4/26/2019 4:53 PM, Andy McMullin via Elecraft wrote: > You are so right. So many people seem to guess what words or phrases mean without bothering to determine what the rest of society agrees that they mean. Then they expect you to understand their personal interpretation. > > However, I?d add that it?s also useful to remember George Bernard Shaw and his ?two countries divided by a common language?. Try suggesting a ?fag break? to workers in the USA (as I did one coffee time in the 1970?s). > From markmusick at outlook.com Fri Apr 26 17:28:21 2019 From: markmusick at outlook.com (Mark Musick) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 21:28:21 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KPAK3AUX cable length In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Art, I use two in series to my KPA1500 without issues. Before that they were used in series with the KPA500/KAT500. Also, with no issues. 73, Mark, WB9CIF -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Art Suberbielle Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 20:20 To: Elecraft list Subject: [Elecraft] KPAK3AUX cable length Hi all, Does Elecraft sell a longer version of the standard cable? I need about 3 more feet. As an alternative, can 2 of these cables be used in series to provide the extra length without creating any timing issues for the KPA1500? Thanks & 73, Art KZ5D ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From billamader at gmail.com Fri Apr 26 17:36:52 2019 From: billamader at gmail.com (K8TE) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 14:36:52 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> The word that struck my attention is "solar" and the possibility of that controller causing noise. When you were connected to just the battery and dummy load, was the battery disconnected from the solar system? And, at what level was the buzz relative to a full power carrier? Every transmitter has some noise on its signal. Specifications and FCC rules in some cases call for a specific ratio. I can't imagine a factory reset solving a problem like this. Be certain you have saved your configuration first. Solving issues like this is not magic, but sometimes a mystery. 73, Bill, K8TE -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From donwilh at embarqmail.com Fri Apr 26 17:51:15 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:51:15 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> In addition to operating from a battery isolated from the solar system, I would recommend that you do a quick test - remove all cables from the K3S except the power cable and a coax to a dummy load. Power down all power supplies in your station, including any desk lamps. Go into Transmit by tapping the XMIT button. Is the hum still present? If not, then start connecting things to your K3S one at a time, doing the same test after each thing connected. Of course, if the hum is present with nothing connected, contact support at elecraft.com - but I cannot imagine a hum with harmonics of 60 Hz being induced if you take away all the 60 Hz operated sources in the area. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/26/2019 5:36 PM, K8TE wrote: > The word that struck my attention is "solar" and the possibility of that > controller causing noise. When you were connected to just the battery and > dummy load, was the battery disconnected from the solar system? And, at > what level was the buzz relative to a full power carrier? > > Every transmitter has some noise on its signal. Specifications and FCC > rules in some cases call for a specific ratio. I can't imagine a factory > reset solving a problem like this. Be certain you have saved your > configuration first. Solving issues like this is not magic, but sometimes a > mystery. > From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Fri Apr 26 18:07:06 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:07:06 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: I think you may have hit on it, Bill. Say it's a pulse-regulated controller on the battery is on the soft side.? BTW -- most solar charge controllers put out a lot of RF noise. The only good pulsing controllers? I've found are the MPPT controllers made by Genasun. https://sunforgellc.com/genasun/#gen_product_row Another question to help diagnose the problem if it's the battery -- what's the DC voltage at the battery in RX mode?? In TX mode?? What does the K3 internal voltmeter read for RX and TX? 73, Jim K9YC 73, On 4/26/2019 2:36 PM, K8TE wrote: > The word that struck my attention is "solar" and the possibility of that > controller causing noise. When you were connected to just the battery and > dummy load, was the battery disconnected from the solar system? From donovanf at starpower.net Fri Apr 26 18:08:38 2019 From: donovanf at starpower.net (donovanf at starpower.net) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:08:38 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <2031901563.9957180.1556316518363.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> It especially depends on what part of the world you're in... Years ago Mmy wife Phyllis and I spent a weekend visiting Al G3FXB and his XYL Maud. I'll never forget Phyllis' astonishment when, after a long night of enjoyable conversation and when she was ready for bed, Al asked: When would you like me to knock you up tomorrow? 73 Frank W3LPL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Wilhelm" To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 9:25:44 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Of words and such It likely depends on which area of the US you are in. I don't know about the current vernacular, but where I grew up in Central Eastern Ohio in the 1950s and 1960s, cigarettes were known as "fags", and a 'fag break' would be a perfectly acceptable expression. I once heard a broadcast from KDKA in Pittsburg, PA where several language expressions that were unique to that area were cited. The one that sticks in my mind is "chuckle" referring to a pothole in the road. A lot depends on the context. I remember my Grandmother referring to "Go dowm celler to do the wershing" on Mondays. Even within the USA, there is a wide variety of local expressions like that. When I first moved to NC, I did a 2nd take the first time I heard someone say they had to "carry their Mother to the doctor"! 73, Don W3FPR On 4/26/2019 4:53 PM, Andy McMullin via Elecraft wrote: > You are so right. So many people seem to guess what words or phrases mean without bothering to determine what the rest of society agrees that they mean. Then they expect you to understand their personal interpretation. > > However, I?d add that it?s also useful to remember George Bernard Shaw and his ?two countries divided by a common language?. Try suggesting a ?fag break? to workers in the USA (as I did one coffee time in the 1970?s). > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From k9yeq at live.com Fri Apr 26 18:11:22 2019 From: k9yeq at live.com (Bill Johnson) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:11:22 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - DVR installation question In-Reply-To: <4427db0b-5ea7-553d-04e8-47847a3e858e@nycap.rr.com> References: <4427db0b-5ea7-553d-04e8-47847a3e858e@nycap.rr.com> Message-ID: I rarely use my DVR as I don't contest. When I have a mic or audio xmit issue, it is super handy. Just sayin'. 72 & 73, Bill K9YEQ FT?er for K2, KX1, KX3, KXPA100, KAT500, W2, etc. -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Bill Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 9:15 AM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - DVR installation question Grant: thanks for the link to the install manual. WOW!? I don't see that in my future - too many places for errors. My K3 is not broken and I don't want to break it. Thanks again. Of course, I could always sent the K3 out and have all the updates made and the DVR installed. But, all I operate on is 75 meters these days and really see no need for the updates. Again, the K3 is working wonderful. Bill W2BLC ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From donovanf at starpower.net Fri Apr 26 18:16:06 2019 From: donovanf at starpower.net (donovanf at starpower.net) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:16:06 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <1663979405.9978744.1556316966408.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> I had this same problem years ago before purchasing my first K3. It turned out to magnetic field coupling between my HyGain T2X control box and an audio transformer in the transceiver. As Don suggested, be sure all power supplies including computers, UPSs and lamps are turned off during the test. If this doesn't work, take to K3S to a friends QTH and repeat the test 73 Frank W3LPL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Don Wilhelm" To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 9:51:15 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In addition to operating from a battery isolated from the solar system, I would recommend that you do a quick test - remove all cables from the K3S except the power cable and a coax to a dummy load. Power down all power supplies in your station, including any desk lamps. Go into Transmit by tapping the XMIT button. Is the hum still present? If not, then start connecting things to your K3S one at a time, doing the same test after each thing connected. Of course, if the hum is present with nothing connected, contact support at elecraft.com - but I cannot imagine a hum with harmonics of 60 Hz being induced if you take away all the 60 Hz operated sources in the area. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/26/2019 5:36 PM, K8TE wrote: > The word that struck my attention is "solar" and the possibility of that > controller causing noise. When you were connected to just the battery and > dummy load, was the battery disconnected from the solar system? And, at > what level was the buzz relative to a full power carrier? > > Every transmitter has some noise on its signal. Specifications and FCC > rules in some cases call for a specific ratio. I can't imagine a factory > reset solving a problem like this. Be certain you have saved your > configuration first. Solving issues like this is not magic, but sometimes a > mystery. > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Fri Apr 26 18:23:56 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:23:56 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: <1663979405.9978744.1556316966408.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> References: <1663979405.9978744.1556316966408.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> Message-ID: That makes sense too. The transformers are unshielded, so are sitting ducks for strong nearby magnetic fields.? K6XX ran into this early on running RTTY from a big amp PSU very close to a K3. The coupling was so strong that it went into regeneration! 73, Jim K9YC On 4/26/2019 3:16 PM, donovanf at starpower.net wrote: > I had this same problem years ago before purchasing my first K3. > It turned out to magnetic field coupling between my HyGain > T2X control box and an audio transformer in the transceiver. From nick at n6ol.us Fri Apr 26 18:38:22 2019 From: nick at n6ol.us (Nicklas Johnson) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:38:22 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: I did in fact wonder the same thing myself-- whether the solar controller could be injecting some noise or just making some noise, so when I did the battery test, I disconnected the battery from the controller and ran directly from the battery to the rig. I couldn't tell you a dB level of the buzz without having some more accurate equipment to measure it, but it's very noticeable relative to my voice when testing. It was enough to make me think I had either RF feedback or a ground loop giving me grief. There could be something to be learned from the predominant frequencies present in the buzz... they're more or less 120Hz apart, but they start at a weird place-- 350 isn't a multiple of 60 or 120, but that particular spur and the 470 and 830 Hz spurs are all pretty exact, though of course it's not impossible that there's some FFT error in determining those frequencies and they're actually 360, 480, and 840. Curious, though, is that running on a battery, there's nothing to inject a 60Hz or 120Hz noise directly, especially not once I disconnected the rig ground from the ground rod outside. Which makes me wonder if the buzz is just something in the house that's mixing with the carrier and re-radiating. For my next trick, this weekend I think I'll take everything outside on a picnic table, away from house wiring, etc., and see if that changes anything, or I might start with just the receiver outdoors and away from house wiring, and then move on to both if needed. Nick On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:37, K8TE wrote: > The word that struck my attention is "solar" and the possibility of that > controller causing noise. When you were connected to just the battery and > dummy load, was the battery disconnected from the solar system? And, at > what level was the buzz relative to a full power carrier? > > Every transmitter has some noise on its signal. Specifications and FCC > rules in some cases call for a specific ratio. I can't imagine a factory > reset solving a problem like this. Be certain you have saved your > configuration first. Solving issues like this is not magic, but sometimes > a > mystery. > > 73, Bill, K8TE > -- *N6OL* Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not worth supporting. From k6mr at outlook.com Fri Apr 26 18:46:50 2019 From: k6mr at outlook.com (Ken K6MR) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:46:50 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KAT & KPA 500 Remote by Elecraft In-Reply-To: <0479D54E-AE27-4AD1-9EAF-9C0294E5C757@gmail.com> References: <0479D54E-AE27-4AD1-9EAF-9C0294E5C757@gmail.com> Message-ID: Use the command line options in a batch file. The options are COM Baud Port timeout. Something like: start KAT500-Remote.exe COM13 38400 4629 2000 start KPA500-Remote.exe COM11 38400 4627 2000 Insert your appropriate values. Ken K6MR ________________________________ From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of Mike - W5JR Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 1:42:05 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KAT & KPA 500 Remote by Elecraft I?ve poked around looking for a solution, but nothing surfaced. I have the two programs loading on startup, but also need them to go directly into hosting mode. Today, I have to remotely access the shack computer to manually engage ?Start Hosting Remote?. Is there a way others have found? tnx Mike / W5JR Alpharetta GA ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From nick at n6ol.us Fri Apr 26 18:48:23 2019 From: nick at n6ol.us (Nicklas Johnson) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 15:48:23 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: My desk in this case sits adjacent a wall, and there's only a shower on the other side of that wall. I did turn off everything in the vicinity of the desk and all the lights in the room (I've in fact heard a very similar hum from the switching power supply for my mixer, and my first thought was it was this that was being picked up), but I didn't turn off the computer on the other side of the room. In this case it will be easier to move the rig outdoors with a battery than it will be to turn that computer off for the moment. It would have to be an impressively/obnoxiously strong magnetic field from that side of the room to influence the transformers inside the rig 8 feet away, but it's worth trying and simple enough to rule it out. Nick On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:51, Don Wilhelm wrote: > In addition to operating from a battery isolated from the solar system, > I would recommend that you do a quick test - remove all cables from the > K3S except the power cable and a coax to a dummy load. Power down all > power supplies in your station, including any desk lamps. > Go into Transmit by tapping the XMIT button. > Is the hum still present? If not, then start connecting things to your > K3S one at a time, doing the same test after each thing connected. > > Of course, if the hum is present with nothing connected, contact > support at elecraft.com - but I cannot imagine a hum with harmonics of 60 > Hz being induced if you take away all the 60 Hz operated sources in the > area. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > -- *N6OL* Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not worth supporting. From rmcgraw at blomand.net Fri Apr 26 18:56:47 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:56:47 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: I recall commenting earlier. What TX EQ values are being used for AM. ? Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 26, 2019, at 5:48 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > > My desk in this case sits adjacent a wall, and there's only a shower on the > other side of that wall. I did turn off everything in the vicinity of the > desk and all the lights in the room (I've in fact heard a very similar hum > from the switching power supply for my mixer, and my first thought was it > was this that was being picked up), but I didn't turn off the computer on > the other side of the room. In this case it will be easier to move the rig > outdoors with a battery than it will be to turn that computer off for the > moment. It would have to be an impressively/obnoxiously strong magnetic > field from that side of the room to influence the transformers inside the > rig 8 feet away, but it's worth trying and simple enough to rule it out. > > Nick > >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:51, Don Wilhelm wrote: >> >> In addition to operating from a battery isolated from the solar system, >> I would recommend that you do a quick test - remove all cables from the >> K3S except the power cable and a coax to a dummy load. Power down all >> power supplies in your station, including any desk lamps. >> Go into Transmit by tapping the XMIT button. >> Is the hum still present? If not, then start connecting things to your >> K3S one at a time, doing the same test after each thing connected. >> >> Of course, if the hum is present with nothing connected, contact >> support at elecraft.com - but I cannot imagine a hum with harmonics of 60 >> Hz being induced if you take away all the 60 Hz operated sources in the >> area. >> >> 73, >> Don W3FPR >> >> -- > *N6OL* > Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it > real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not > worth supporting. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From nick at n6ol.us Fri Apr 26 19:38:32 2019 From: nick at n6ol.us (Nicklas Johnson) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 16:38:32 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: Flat, except I turned the first one down a few notches, which doesn't really do much in my case because both the microphone and mixer that I use (when they're actually connected) roll off below 150 and 80 Hz respectively. It had previously been suggested to me that rolling off low frequency cruft is a good idea for AM and SSB. Nick On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 15:57, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > I recall commenting earlier. What TX EQ values are being used for AM. ? > > Bob, K4TAX > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Apr 26, 2019, at 5:48 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > > > > My desk in this case sits adjacent a wall, and there's only a shower on > the > > other side of that wall. I did turn off everything in the vicinity of > the > > desk and all the lights in the room (I've in fact heard a very similar > hum > > from the switching power supply for my mixer, and my first thought was it > > was this that was being picked up), but I didn't turn off the computer on > > the other side of the room. In this case it will be easier to move the > rig > > outdoors with a battery than it will be to turn that computer off for the > > moment. It would have to be an impressively/obnoxiously strong magnetic > > field from that side of the room to influence the transformers inside the > > rig 8 feet away, but it's worth trying and simple enough to rule it out. > > > > Nick > > > >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:51, Don Wilhelm > wrote: > >> > >> In addition to operating from a battery isolated from the solar system, > >> I would recommend that you do a quick test - remove all cables from the > >> K3S except the power cable and a coax to a dummy load. Power down all > >> power supplies in your station, including any desk lamps. > >> Go into Transmit by tapping the XMIT button. > >> Is the hum still present? If not, then start connecting things to your > >> K3S one at a time, doing the same test after each thing connected. > >> > >> Of course, if the hum is present with nothing connected, contact > >> support at elecraft.com - but I cannot imagine a hum with harmonics of 60 > >> Hz being induced if you take away all the 60 Hz operated sources in the > >> area. > >> > >> 73, > >> Don W3FPR > >> > >> -- > > *N6OL* > > Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make > it > > real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not > > worth supporting. > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > -- *N6OL* Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not worth supporting. From rmcgraw at blomand.net Fri Apr 26 20:28:33 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 19:28:33 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <3F7D0A22-0B4F-448D-B298-F642DEE1065B@blomand.net> Yes but the EQ is in the digital path. The EQ should be done there, preferably after the MIC input. The AM BW does not attenuate the end like the SSB filter. I suggest -16 dB on the first 3 bands. Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:38 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > > Flat, except I turned the first one down a few notches, which doesn't > really do much in my case because both the microphone and mixer that I use > (when they're actually connected) roll off below 150 and 80 Hz > respectively. It had previously been suggested to me that rolling off low > frequency cruft is a good idea for AM and SSB. > > Nick > >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 15:57, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: >> >> I recall commenting earlier. What TX EQ values are being used for AM. ? >> >> Bob, K4TAX >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 5:48 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >>> >>> My desk in this case sits adjacent a wall, and there's only a shower on >> the >>> other side of that wall. I did turn off everything in the vicinity of >> the >>> desk and all the lights in the room (I've in fact heard a very similar >> hum >>> from the switching power supply for my mixer, and my first thought was it >>> was this that was being picked up), but I didn't turn off the computer on >>> the other side of the room. In this case it will be easier to move the >> rig >>> outdoors with a battery than it will be to turn that computer off for the >>> moment. It would have to be an impressively/obnoxiously strong magnetic >>> field from that side of the room to influence the transformers inside the >>> rig 8 feet away, but it's worth trying and simple enough to rule it out. >>> >>> Nick >>> >>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:51, Don Wilhelm >> wrote: >>>> >>>> In addition to operating from a battery isolated from the solar system, >>>> I would recommend that you do a quick test - remove all cables from the >>>> K3S except the power cable and a coax to a dummy load. Power down all >>>> power supplies in your station, including any desk lamps. >>>> Go into Transmit by tapping the XMIT button. >>>> Is the hum still present? If not, then start connecting things to your >>>> K3S one at a time, doing the same test after each thing connected. >>>> >>>> Of course, if the hum is present with nothing connected, contact >>>> support at elecraft.com - but I cannot imagine a hum with harmonics of 60 >>>> Hz being induced if you take away all the 60 Hz operated sources in the >>>> area. >>>> >>>> 73, >>>> Don W3FPR >>>> >>>> -- >>> *N6OL* >>> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make >> it >>> real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not >>> worth supporting. >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >> >> > > -- > *N6OL* > Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it > real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not > worth supporting. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Fri Apr 26 20:39:25 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:39:25 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <02388993-697b-17b2-6f0f-37049dc1b798@audiosystemsgroup.com> A pro audio colleague, Neil Muncy, now deceased, specialized in chasing down hum and buzz in home studios. One mechanism he ran into several times was "triplen" harmonic current on the incoming neutral or ground, and I worked with him on one of them. These harmonic currents are the result of distortion of the current waveform on power lines,which in turn is caused by current in anything with a capacitor input power supply drawing most of the current? at positive and negative peaks of the AC cycle. Most power lines outside our home are some form of 3-phase, and in these systems, any harmonic divisible by 3 ADDS in the neutral rather than cancelling. The most prominent components are 180 Hz, 360 Hz, 540 Hz, 720 Hz, and so on, and they are heard as "buzz" rather than hum. Few of us have 3-phase power in our homes, but a power distribution system called "high leg Delta" or "wild leg" is VERY widely used in neighborhoods where the customers are a mix residential and light industrial.? This system is a Delta, but with one leg of the Delta center-tapped. The 3-phase customers are fed from the Delta, and single-phase customers from the center-tapped transformer. Single phase customers get phase-phase-neutral. The 3-phase customers get no neutral, but they generate lots of triplen harmonics that go to ground via the neutral bond in single-phase homes.? My home in the Santa Cruz Mountains, is fed single-phase power (120-0-120) by high-leg Delta. Depending on lots of factors, that triplen current can get pretty large, and the magnetic field can couple into any magnetic loop, into any unshielded transformer, and into magnetic guitar pickups! That's where Neil came in.? How strong the pickup is depends on the routing of the neutral and ground wire carrying that triplen current. Another colleague working on the design of audio for a major TV studio in NYC found very high triplen currents in a vertical riser in the high rise building housing the studio, right next to the main mix console. MAJOR problem -- it got into almost all the gear and low level mic wiring in the room! As to the accuracy of your FFT frequencies -- FFT's are computed in "bins" with their width dependent on the FFT parameters for any given measurement/display width. If bins are fairly wide, the frequencies you're reading could easily be triplen harmonics. 73, Jim K9YC On 4/26/2019 3:38 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > they're more or less 120Hz apart, but they start at > a weird place-- 350 isn't a multiple of 60 or 120, but that particular spur > and the 470 and 830 Hz spurs are all pretty exact, though of course it's > not impossible that there's some FFT error in determining those frequencies > and they're actually 360, 480, and 840. From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Fri Apr 26 20:42:47 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 17:42:47 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: <3F7D0A22-0B4F-448D-B298-F642DEE1065B@blomand.net> References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> <3F7D0A22-0B4F-448D-B298-F642DEE1065B@blomand.net> Message-ID: <665ad944-1b32-a0c4-f890-5d59fe81b32f@audiosystemsgroup.com> On 4/26/2019 5:28 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > I suggest -16 dB on the first 3 bands. My standard recommendation for ham radio is to start with max cut of 50, 100, and 200 Hz bands, 6 dB of cut of the 400 Hz band, and get signal reports. Do this in TXEQ. What sounds "right" will depend on your voice and your mic, so take this as a starting point. 73, Jim K9YC From nick at n6ol.us Fri Apr 26 21:11:31 2019 From: nick at n6ol.us (Nicklas Johnson) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:11:31 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: <3F7D0A22-0B4F-448D-B298-F642DEE1065B@blomand.net> References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> <3F7D0A22-0B4F-448D-B298-F642DEE1065B@blomand.net> Message-ID: A few more data points: Changing TX EQ, including cutting the first 4 bands all the way down to -16 had no effect on the received signal. Plugging in some headphones, turning the TX Monitor up all the way, I don't detect the hum in the TX monitor signal either in TX test mode, transmitting into a dummy load, or even transmitting into the antenna with very low power. If I turn up the Line In level, I just hear expected white noise on the TX monitor. So at least as far along the path as the TX monitor, there's no hum or buzz introduced. Switching the receiver (a KX3) to USB mode and using one leg of a buddistick as an antenna so I can walk around, the noise received around the house and outside is around S4 when transmitting about 100mW into the antenna, though it varies some as I walk around. I do have a set of power lines running through my back yard, and where I live in San Mateo, you're always near somebody's wiring for something, unfortunately... my neighbor's south wall is possibly as far as 8 feet away from my north wall, etc. It looks like two phases running along the top, then a transformer to two phases and a neutral along the bottom, to which people's houses are connected. We also have underground utilities on our street, including a big green transformer that sits in the corner of our front lawn. I think the next test will be to take the K3S and the KX3 some distance away from all of these things and see if the hum goes away, and if it does, then figure out what thing the K3S needs to get away from in particular. If it's the powerlines in my back yard or the transformer in my front yard, then that'll be a difficult problem. Nick On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 17:28, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > Yes but the EQ is in the digital path. The EQ should be done there, > preferably after the MIC input. The AM BW does not attenuate the end like > the SSB filter. > > I suggest -16 dB on the first 3 bands. > > Bob, K4TAX > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:38 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > > > > Flat, except I turned the first one down a few notches, which doesn't > > really do much in my case because both the microphone and mixer that I > use > > (when they're actually connected) roll off below 150 and 80 Hz > > respectively. It had previously been suggested to me that rolling off > low > > frequency cruft is a good idea for AM and SSB. > > > > Nick > > > >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 15:57, Bob McGraw K4TAX > wrote: > >> > >> I recall commenting earlier. What TX EQ values are being used for AM. ? > >> > >> Bob, K4TAX > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPhone > >> > >>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 5:48 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > >>> > >>> My desk in this case sits adjacent a wall, and there's only a shower on > >> the > >>> other side of that wall. I did turn off everything in the vicinity of > >> the > >>> desk and all the lights in the room (I've in fact heard a very similar > >> hum > >>> from the switching power supply for my mixer, and my first thought was > it > >>> was this that was being picked up), but I didn't turn off the computer > on > >>> the other side of the room. In this case it will be easier to move the > >> rig > >>> outdoors with a battery than it will be to turn that computer off for > the > >>> moment. It would have to be an impressively/obnoxiously strong > magnetic > >>> field from that side of the room to influence the transformers inside > the > >>> rig 8 feet away, but it's worth trying and simple enough to rule it > out. > >>> > >>> Nick > >>> > >>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:51, Don Wilhelm > >> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> In addition to operating from a battery isolated from the solar > system, > >>>> I would recommend that you do a quick test - remove all cables from > the > >>>> K3S except the power cable and a coax to a dummy load. Power down all > >>>> power supplies in your station, including any desk lamps. > >>>> Go into Transmit by tapping the XMIT button. > >>>> Is the hum still present? If not, then start connecting things to > your > >>>> K3S one at a time, doing the same test after each thing connected. > >>>> > >>>> Of course, if the hum is present with nothing connected, contact > >>>> support at elecraft.com - but I cannot imagine a hum with harmonics of > 60 > >>>> Hz being induced if you take away all the 60 Hz operated sources in > the > >>>> area. > >>>> > >>>> 73, > >>>> Don W3FPR > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>> *N6OL* > >>> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't > make > >> it > >>> real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is > not > >>> worth supporting. > >>> ______________________________________________________________ > >>> Elecraft mailing list > >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > >>> > >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > >>> > >> > >> > > > > -- > > *N6OL* > > Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make > it > > real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not > > worth supporting. > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > > -- *N6OL* Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not worth supporting. From nick at n6ol.us Fri Apr 26 21:53:27 2019 From: nick at n6ol.us (Nicklas Johnson) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 18:53:27 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> <3F7D0A22-0B4F-448D-B298-F642DEE1065B@blomand.net> Message-ID: Sorry for the additional email, but this is particularly interesting: it occurred to me that I'd never tried the reverse setup, so I put the KX3 in transmit mode and 0.1W on AM in another room, and set the K3S on receive. And sure enough, the K3S immediately started picking up S40 of buzzing noise. However if I tune the K3S to an AM broadcast station or WWV, no buzz. So either both the K3S and KX3 are being affected on transmit in the same way (which seems implausible but not impossible), or possibly something else is going on at my QTH. On the P3, I definitely see the noise when the KX3 is transmitting from the other room. Now I wish I had a scope so I could see what the AM carrier generated by the KX3 and K3S looks like so I could tell if this is something that's happening inside the transmitter, or something that is happening because of some outside influence mixing powerline noise with the AM carrier. The important thing to me is that the carrier I'm putting out there is clean... if there's some local mixing that happens that means I can't listen to my own transmission without a buzz, I can live with that. One kind of curious thing is that there's also a superimposed "squeaky wheel" sound at random intervals detectable when the KX3 is transmitting an AM carrier, and not otherwise, and also not when listening to WWV or AM broadcast, which vaguely seems to correlate with how windy it is at any given moment. Could all of this be a "rusty bolt" effect from something in the vicinity? Nick On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 18:11, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > A few more data points: > > Changing TX EQ, including cutting the first 4 bands all the way down to > -16 had no effect on the received signal. > > Plugging in some headphones, turning the TX Monitor up all the way, I > don't detect the hum in the TX monitor signal either in TX test mode, > transmitting into a dummy load, or even transmitting into the antenna with > very low power. If I turn up the Line In level, I just hear expected white > noise on the TX monitor. So at least as far along the path as the TX > monitor, there's no hum or buzz introduced. > > Switching the receiver (a KX3) to USB mode and using one leg of a > buddistick as an antenna so I can walk around, the noise received around > the house and outside is around S4 when transmitting about 100mW into the > antenna, though it varies some as I walk around. > > I do have a set of power lines running through my back yard, and where I > live in San Mateo, you're always near somebody's wiring for something, > unfortunately... my neighbor's south wall is possibly as far as 8 feet away > from my north wall, etc. > > It looks like two phases running along the top, then a transformer to two > phases and a neutral along the bottom, to which people's houses are > connected. > > We also have underground utilities on our street, including a big green > transformer that sits in the corner of our front lawn. > > I think the next test will be to take the K3S and the KX3 some distance > away from all of these things and see if the hum goes away, and if it does, > then figure out what thing the K3S needs to get away from in particular. > If it's the powerlines in my back yard or the transformer in my front yard, > then that'll be a difficult problem. > > Nick > > > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 17:28, Bob McGraw K4TAX > wrote: > >> Yes but the EQ is in the digital path. The EQ should be done there, >> preferably after the MIC input. The AM BW does not attenuate the end like >> the SSB filter. >> >> I suggest -16 dB on the first 3 bands. >> >> Bob, K4TAX >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:38 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >> > >> > Flat, except I turned the first one down a few notches, which doesn't >> > really do much in my case because both the microphone and mixer that I >> use >> > (when they're actually connected) roll off below 150 and 80 Hz >> > respectively. It had previously been suggested to me that rolling off >> low >> > frequency cruft is a good idea for AM and SSB. >> > >> > Nick >> > >> >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 15:57, Bob McGraw K4TAX >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I recall commenting earlier. What TX EQ values are being used for AM. >> ? >> >> >> >> Bob, K4TAX >> >> >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> >> >>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 5:48 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >> >>> >> >>> My desk in this case sits adjacent a wall, and there's only a shower >> on >> >> the >> >>> other side of that wall. I did turn off everything in the vicinity of >> >> the >> >>> desk and all the lights in the room (I've in fact heard a very similar >> >> hum >> >>> from the switching power supply for my mixer, and my first thought >> was it >> >>> was this that was being picked up), but I didn't turn off the >> computer on >> >>> the other side of the room. In this case it will be easier to move >> the >> >> rig >> >>> outdoors with a battery than it will be to turn that computer off for >> the >> >>> moment. It would have to be an impressively/obnoxiously strong >> magnetic >> >>> field from that side of the room to influence the transformers inside >> the >> >>> rig 8 feet away, but it's worth trying and simple enough to rule it >> out. >> >>> >> >>> Nick >> >>> >> >>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:51, Don Wilhelm >> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> In addition to operating from a battery isolated from the solar >> system, >> >>>> I would recommend that you do a quick test - remove all cables from >> the >> >>>> K3S except the power cable and a coax to a dummy load. Power down >> all >> >>>> power supplies in your station, including any desk lamps. >> >>>> Go into Transmit by tapping the XMIT button. >> >>>> Is the hum still present? If not, then start connecting things to >> your >> >>>> K3S one at a time, doing the same test after each thing connected. >> >>>> >> >>>> Of course, if the hum is present with nothing connected, contact >> >>>> support at elecraft.com - but I cannot imagine a hum with harmonics of >> 60 >> >>>> Hz being induced if you take away all the 60 Hz operated sources in >> the >> >>>> area. >> >>>> >> >>>> 73, >> >>>> Don W3FPR >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>> *N6OL* >> >>> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't >> make >> >> it >> >>> real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is >> not >> >>> worth supporting. >> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >> >>> Elecraft mailing list >> >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >>> >> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > *N6OL* >> > Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't >> make it >> > real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not >> > worth supporting. >> > ______________________________________________________________ >> > Elecraft mailing list >> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> > >> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > >> >> >> > > -- > *N6OL* > Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make > it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not > worth supporting. > -- *N6OL* Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not worth supporting. From rmcgraw at blomand.net Fri Apr 26 22:17:52 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 21:17:52 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> <3F7D0A22-0B4F-448D-B298-F642DEE1065B@blomand.net> Message-ID: <3759A50D-1A10-47A7-BB58-DD824A5783D3@blomand.net> I think Jim's concern, expressed earlier, about power line neutral distortion components is valid. And it may be originating in "the big green transformer" in the yard. Bob, K4TAX Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 26, 2019, at 8:53 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > > Sorry for the additional email, but this is particularly interesting: it > occurred to me that I'd never tried the reverse setup, so I put the KX3 in > transmit mode and 0.1W on AM in another room, and set the K3S on receive. > And sure enough, the K3S immediately started picking up S40 of buzzing > noise. However if I tune the K3S to an AM broadcast station or WWV, no > buzz. So either both the K3S and KX3 are being affected on transmit in the > same way (which seems implausible but not impossible), or possibly > something else is going on at my QTH. > > On the P3, I definitely see the noise when the KX3 is transmitting from the > other room. > > Now I wish I had a scope so I could see what the AM carrier generated by > the KX3 and K3S looks like so I could tell if this is something that's > happening inside the transmitter, or something that is happening because of > some outside influence mixing powerline noise with the AM carrier. The > important thing to me is that the carrier I'm putting out there is clean... > if there's some local mixing that happens that means I can't listen to my > own transmission without a buzz, I can live with that. > > One kind of curious thing is that there's also a superimposed "squeaky > wheel" sound at random intervals detectable when the KX3 is transmitting an > AM carrier, and not otherwise, and also not when listening to WWV or AM > broadcast, which vaguely seems to correlate with how windy it is at any > given moment. Could all of this be a "rusty bolt" effect from something in > the vicinity? > > Nick > > > >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 18:11, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >> >> A few more data points: >> >> Changing TX EQ, including cutting the first 4 bands all the way down to >> -16 had no effect on the received signal. >> >> Plugging in some headphones, turning the TX Monitor up all the way, I >> don't detect the hum in the TX monitor signal either in TX test mode, >> transmitting into a dummy load, or even transmitting into the antenna with >> very low power. If I turn up the Line In level, I just hear expected white >> noise on the TX monitor. So at least as far along the path as the TX >> monitor, there's no hum or buzz introduced. >> >> Switching the receiver (a KX3) to USB mode and using one leg of a >> buddistick as an antenna so I can walk around, the noise received around >> the house and outside is around S4 when transmitting about 100mW into the >> antenna, though it varies some as I walk around. >> >> I do have a set of power lines running through my back yard, and where I >> live in San Mateo, you're always near somebody's wiring for something, >> unfortunately... my neighbor's south wall is possibly as far as 8 feet away >> from my north wall, etc. >> >> It looks like two phases running along the top, then a transformer to two >> phases and a neutral along the bottom, to which people's houses are >> connected. >> >> We also have underground utilities on our street, including a big green >> transformer that sits in the corner of our front lawn. >> >> I think the next test will be to take the K3S and the KX3 some distance >> away from all of these things and see if the hum goes away, and if it does, >> then figure out what thing the K3S needs to get away from in particular. >> If it's the powerlines in my back yard or the transformer in my front yard, >> then that'll be a difficult problem. >> >> Nick >> >> >> >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 17:28, Bob McGraw K4TAX >> wrote: >> >>> Yes but the EQ is in the digital path. The EQ should be done there, >>> preferably after the MIC input. The AM BW does not attenuate the end like >>> the SSB filter. >>> >>> I suggest -16 dB on the first 3 bands. >>> >>> Bob, K4TAX >>> >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:38 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >>>> >>>> Flat, except I turned the first one down a few notches, which doesn't >>>> really do much in my case because both the microphone and mixer that I >>> use >>>> (when they're actually connected) roll off below 150 and 80 Hz >>>> respectively. It had previously been suggested to me that rolling off >>> low >>>> frequency cruft is a good idea for AM and SSB. >>>> >>>> Nick >>>> >>>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 15:57, Bob McGraw K4TAX >>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I recall commenting earlier. What TX EQ values are being used for AM. >>> ? >>>>> >>>>> Bob, K4TAX >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 5:48 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> My desk in this case sits adjacent a wall, and there's only a shower >>> on >>>>> the >>>>>> other side of that wall. I did turn off everything in the vicinity of >>>>> the >>>>>> desk and all the lights in the room (I've in fact heard a very similar >>>>> hum >>>>>> from the switching power supply for my mixer, and my first thought >>> was it >>>>>> was this that was being picked up), but I didn't turn off the >>> computer on >>>>>> the other side of the room. In this case it will be easier to move >>> the >>>>> rig >>>>>> outdoors with a battery than it will be to turn that computer off for >>> the >>>>>> moment. It would have to be an impressively/obnoxiously strong >>> magnetic >>>>>> field from that side of the room to influence the transformers inside >>> the >>>>>> rig 8 feet away, but it's worth trying and simple enough to rule it >>> out. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nick >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:51, Don Wilhelm >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> In addition to operating from a battery isolated from the solar >>> system, >>>>>>> I would recommend that you do a quick test - remove all cables from >>> the >>>>>>> K3S except the power cable and a coax to a dummy load. Power down >>> all >>>>>>> power supplies in your station, including any desk lamps. >>>>>>> Go into Transmit by tapping the XMIT button. >>>>>>> Is the hum still present? If not, then start connecting things to >>> your >>>>>>> K3S one at a time, doing the same test after each thing connected. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Of course, if the hum is present with nothing connected, contact >>>>>>> support at elecraft.com - but I cannot imagine a hum with harmonics of >>> 60 >>>>>>> Hz being induced if you take away all the 60 Hz operated sources in >>> the >>>>>>> area. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 73, >>>>>>> Don W3FPR >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> *N6OL* >>>>>> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't >>> make >>>>> it >>>>>> real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is >>> not >>>>>> worth supporting. >>>>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>>>> >>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *N6OL* >>>> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't >>> make it >>>> real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not >>>> worth supporting. >>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>> >>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> -- >> *N6OL* >> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make >> it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not >> worth supporting. >> > > > -- > *N6OL* > Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it > real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not > worth supporting. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From W2xj at w2xj.net Fri Apr 26 22:37:04 2019 From: W2xj at w2xj.net (W2xj) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:37:04 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Sounds like some internal RF feedback. Sent from my iPad > On Apr 26, 2019, at 11:43 AM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > > This morning just for yuks, I also temporarily disconnected the ground from > the rig entirely while also connecting only to a dummy load, so there could > be no path to ground at all, let alone multiple paths. No change. > > I guess the next things I'll probably try are a full factory reset, and > then perhaps popping it open to make sure nothing has come unseated. But > first I'll drop a line to Elecraft support too. I've seen a number of > people post about similar problems that either magically resolved > themselves or ended up being a fault on the audio board. > > Nick > > >> On Thu, 25 Apr 2019 at 23:27, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >> >> Again, the problem persists with all inputs completely disconnected and >> the mic gain set at 0. And running solely on a battery into a dummy load. >> >> Nick >> >> On Thu, Apr 25, 2019, 10:10 PM Jim Brown >> wrote: >> >>>> On 4/25/2019 8:15 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >>>> Physically touching the case or grabbing the barrel of the front panel >>> mic >>>> connector actually does cause the buzz to get just a little softer. >>> >>> I suspect either a bonding problem or a problem with the wiring of the >>> mic. >>> >>>> I generally use solar/battery power, though my ground is bonded to my >>>> utility ground. >>> >>> I suggest that you carefully study either N0AX's recent ARRL book on >>> grounding and bonding, or the slides for talks I've given at Visalia and >>> Pacifion. >>> >>> 73, Jim K9YC >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >> > > -- > *N6OL* > Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it > real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not > worth supporting. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From W2xj at w2xj.net Fri Apr 26 22:43:48 2019 From: W2xj at w2xj.net (W2xj) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 22:43:48 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: EQ should have nothing to do with solving the problem. EQ just masks it. Sent from my iPad > On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:56 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > > I recall commenting earlier. What TX EQ values are being used for AM. ? > > Bob, K4TAX > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Apr 26, 2019, at 5:48 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >> >> My desk in this case sits adjacent a wall, and there's only a shower on the >> other side of that wall. I did turn off everything in the vicinity of the >> desk and all the lights in the room (I've in fact heard a very similar hum >> from the switching power supply for my mixer, and my first thought was it >> was this that was being picked up), but I didn't turn off the computer on >> the other side of the room. In this case it will be easier to move the rig >> outdoors with a battery than it will be to turn that computer off for the >> moment. It would have to be an impressively/obnoxiously strong magnetic >> field from that side of the room to influence the transformers inside the >> rig 8 feet away, but it's worth trying and simple enough to rule it out. >> >> Nick >> >>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:51, Don Wilhelm wrote: >>> >>> In addition to operating from a battery isolated from the solar system, >>> I would recommend that you do a quick test - remove all cables from the >>> K3S except the power cable and a coax to a dummy load. Power down all >>> power supplies in your station, including any desk lamps. >>> Go into Transmit by tapping the XMIT button. >>> Is the hum still present? If not, then start connecting things to your >>> K3S one at a time, doing the same test after each thing connected. >>> >>> Of course, if the hum is present with nothing connected, contact >>> support at elecraft.com - but I cannot imagine a hum with harmonics of 60 >>> Hz being induced if you take away all the 60 Hz operated sources in the >>> area. >>> >>> 73, >>> Don W3FPR >>> >>> -- >> *N6OL* >> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it >> real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not >> worth supporting. >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From nick at n6ol.us Fri Apr 26 22:46:18 2019 From: nick at n6ol.us (Nicklas Johnson) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 19:46:18 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: <3759A50D-1A10-47A7-BB58-DD824A5783D3@blomand.net> References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> <3F7D0A22-0B4F-448D-B298-F642DEE1065B@blomand.net> <3759A50D-1A10-47A7-BB58-DD824A5783D3@blomand.net> Message-ID: Before I forget, thank you to everyone who has responded thusfar with ideas and suggestions. This one is a real head-scratcher, and I appreciate everyone bouncing ideas around with me. If the problem is in fact originating with power line neutral distortion, what, if anything could I actually do about it, beyond what I've already done in running on battery power? I can't really move my 'shack' in this case. I did find the "squeaky wheel" at least. It was the end of one of the aluminum straps of an antenna mast chimney mount brushing against a copper ground wire in the wind. A pair of tin snips solved that problem. This bit was kind of fascinating-- if I held a copper wire against the aluminum strap, and position the antenna of the KX3 nearby, I could receive some broadcast AM station on the 51.123 MHz carrier I was transmitting from inside the house (it's pretty close to a multiple of 810kHz, so if I had to guess, it was likely KGO I was getting). I also found the noise gets a hell of a lot louder near the back gutter of the house (which runs parallel to the power lines that run through the back yard), though this could just be because the antenna of my KX3 was coupling to it. Yet to be determined is whether the noise is a local thing only affecting reception (e.g., some kind of passive intermod), or if in fact it becomes part of the signal I'm sending up to the ionosphere. To really figure that one out, I probably will need to make an actual distant AM contact and ask someone to tell me how it sounds... this may be no small feat with the way the sun is behaving lately, but I'll keep trying. Nick On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 19:18, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > I think Jim's concern, expressed earlier, about power line neutral > distortion components is valid. And it may be originating in "the big green > transformer" in the yard. > > Bob, K4TAX > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Apr 26, 2019, at 8:53 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > > > > Sorry for the additional email, but this is particularly interesting: it > > occurred to me that I'd never tried the reverse setup, so I put the KX3 > in > > transmit mode and 0.1W on AM in another room, and set the K3S on receive. > > And sure enough, the K3S immediately started picking up S40 of buzzing > > noise. However if I tune the K3S to an AM broadcast station or WWV, no > > buzz. So either both the K3S and KX3 are being affected on transmit in > the > > same way (which seems implausible but not impossible), or possibly > > something else is going on at my QTH. > > > > On the P3, I definitely see the noise when the KX3 is transmitting from > the > > other room. > > > > Now I wish I had a scope so I could see what the AM carrier generated by > > the KX3 and K3S looks like so I could tell if this is something that's > > happening inside the transmitter, or something that is happening because > of > > some outside influence mixing powerline noise with the AM carrier. The > > important thing to me is that the carrier I'm putting out there is > clean... > > if there's some local mixing that happens that means I can't listen to my > > own transmission without a buzz, I can live with that. > > > > One kind of curious thing is that there's also a superimposed "squeaky > > wheel" sound at random intervals detectable when the KX3 is transmitting > an > > AM carrier, and not otherwise, and also not when listening to WWV or AM > > broadcast, which vaguely seems to correlate with how windy it is at any > > given moment. Could all of this be a "rusty bolt" effect from something > in > > the vicinity? > > > > Nick > > > > > > > >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 18:11, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > >> > >> A few more data points: > >> > >> Changing TX EQ, including cutting the first 4 bands all the way down to > >> -16 had no effect on the received signal. > >> > >> Plugging in some headphones, turning the TX Monitor up all the way, I > >> don't detect the hum in the TX monitor signal either in TX test mode, > >> transmitting into a dummy load, or even transmitting into the antenna > with > >> very low power. If I turn up the Line In level, I just hear expected > white > >> noise on the TX monitor. So at least as far along the path as the TX > >> monitor, there's no hum or buzz introduced. > >> > >> Switching the receiver (a KX3) to USB mode and using one leg of a > >> buddistick as an antenna so I can walk around, the noise received around > >> the house and outside is around S4 when transmitting about 100mW into > the > >> antenna, though it varies some as I walk around. > >> > >> I do have a set of power lines running through my back yard, and where I > >> live in San Mateo, you're always near somebody's wiring for something, > >> unfortunately... my neighbor's south wall is possibly as far as 8 feet > away > >> from my north wall, etc. > >> > >> It looks like two phases running along the top, then a transformer to > two > >> phases and a neutral along the bottom, to which people's houses are > >> connected. > >> > >> We also have underground utilities on our street, including a big green > >> transformer that sits in the corner of our front lawn. > >> > >> I think the next test will be to take the K3S and the KX3 some distance > >> away from all of these things and see if the hum goes away, and if it > does, > >> then figure out what thing the K3S needs to get away from in particular. > >> If it's the powerlines in my back yard or the transformer in my front > yard, > >> then that'll be a difficult problem. > >> > >> Nick > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 17:28, Bob McGraw K4TAX > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Yes but the EQ is in the digital path. The EQ should be done there, > >>> preferably after the MIC input. The AM BW does not attenuate the end > like > >>> the SSB filter. > >>> > >>> I suggest -16 dB on the first 3 bands. > >>> > >>> Bob, K4TAX > >>> > >>> > >>> Sent from my iPhone > >>> > >>>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:38 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Flat, except I turned the first one down a few notches, which doesn't > >>>> really do much in my case because both the microphone and mixer that I > >>> use > >>>> (when they're actually connected) roll off below 150 and 80 Hz > >>>> respectively. It had previously been suggested to me that rolling off > >>> low > >>>> frequency cruft is a good idea for AM and SSB. > >>>> > >>>> Nick > >>>> > >>>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 15:57, Bob McGraw K4TAX > >>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I recall commenting earlier. What TX EQ values are being used for > AM. > >>> ? > >>>>> > >>>>> Bob, K4TAX > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Sent from my iPhone > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 5:48 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> My desk in this case sits adjacent a wall, and there's only a shower > >>> on > >>>>> the > >>>>>> other side of that wall. I did turn off everything in the vicinity > of > >>>>> the > >>>>>> desk and all the lights in the room (I've in fact heard a very > similar > >>>>> hum > >>>>>> from the switching power supply for my mixer, and my first thought > >>> was it > >>>>>> was this that was being picked up), but I didn't turn off the > >>> computer on > >>>>>> the other side of the room. In this case it will be easier to move > >>> the > >>>>> rig > >>>>>> outdoors with a battery than it will be to turn that computer off > for > >>> the > >>>>>> moment. It would have to be an impressively/obnoxiously strong > >>> magnetic > >>>>>> field from that side of the room to influence the transformers > inside > >>> the > >>>>>> rig 8 feet away, but it's worth trying and simple enough to rule it > >>> out. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Nick > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:51, Don Wilhelm > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> In addition to operating from a battery isolated from the solar > >>> system, > >>>>>>> I would recommend that you do a quick test - remove all cables from > >>> the > >>>>>>> K3S except the power cable and a coax to a dummy load. Power down > >>> all > >>>>>>> power supplies in your station, including any desk lamps. > >>>>>>> Go into Transmit by tapping the XMIT button. > >>>>>>> Is the hum still present? If not, then start connecting things to > >>> your > >>>>>>> K3S one at a time, doing the same test after each thing connected. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Of course, if the hum is present with nothing connected, contact > >>>>>>> support at elecraft.com - but I cannot imagine a hum with harmonics > of > >>> 60 > >>>>>>> Hz being induced if you take away all the 60 Hz operated sources in > >>> the > >>>>>>> area. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 73, > >>>>>>> Don W3FPR > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>> *N6OL* > >>>>>> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't > >>> make > >>>>> it > >>>>>> real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is > >>> not > >>>>>> worth supporting. > >>>>>> ______________________________________________________________ > >>>>>> Elecraft mailing list > >>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > >>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > >>>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > >>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> *N6OL* > >>>> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't > >>> make it > >>>> real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is > not > >>>> worth supporting. > >>>> ______________________________________________________________ > >>>> Elecraft mailing list > >>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > >>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > >>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > >>>> > >>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > >>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> *N6OL* > >> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make > >> it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is > not > >> worth supporting. > >> > > > > > > -- > > *N6OL* > > Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make > it > > real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not > > worth supporting. > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > > -- *N6OL* Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not worth supporting. From kg9hfrank at gmail.com Fri Apr 26 22:48:50 2019 From: kg9hfrank at gmail.com (Frank Krozel) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 21:48:50 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> <3F7D0A22-0B4F-448D-B298-F642DEE1065B@blomand.net> <3759A50D-1A10-47A7-BB58-DD824A5783D3@blomand.net> Message-ID: <410FDDA6-4C99-49FB-8DED-5D75AB1A5D1E@gmail.com> Try switching to a linear supply? Sincerely, Frank Krozel t: 1-630-924-1600 frank at electronicinstrument.com BSEE, AASEET, FCC Lic.# PG-18-19178, KG9H Electronic Instrument Associates - Central, Inc. ...since 1971 w: www.electronicinstrument.com d/l our linecard at http://www.electronicinstrument.com/lc.pdf > On Apr 26, 2019, at 9:46 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > > Before I forget, thank you to everyone who has responded thusfar with ideas > and suggestions. This one is a real head-scratcher, and I appreciate > everyone bouncing ideas around with me. > > If the problem is in fact originating with power line neutral distortion, > what, if anything could I actually do about it, beyond what I've already > done in running on battery power? I can't really move my 'shack' in this > case. > > I did find the "squeaky wheel" at least. It was the end of one of the > aluminum straps of an antenna mast chimney mount brushing against a copper > ground wire in the wind. A pair of tin snips solved that problem. This > bit was kind of fascinating-- if I held a copper wire against the aluminum > strap, and position the antenna of the KX3 nearby, I could receive some > broadcast AM station on the 51.123 MHz carrier I was transmitting from > inside the house (it's pretty close to a multiple of 810kHz, so if I had to > guess, it was likely KGO I was getting). > > I also found the noise gets a hell of a lot louder near the back gutter of > the house (which runs parallel to the power lines that run through the back > yard), though this could just be because the antenna of my KX3 was coupling > to it. > > Yet to be determined is whether the noise is a local thing only affecting > reception (e.g., some kind of passive intermod), or if in fact it becomes > part of the signal I'm sending up to the ionosphere. To really figure that > one out, I probably will need to make an actual distant AM contact and ask > someone to tell me how it sounds... this may be no small feat with the way > the sun is behaving lately, but I'll keep trying. > > Nick > >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 19:18, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: >> >> I think Jim's concern, expressed earlier, about power line neutral >> distortion components is valid. And it may be originating in "the big green >> transformer" in the yard. >> >> Bob, K4TAX >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 8:53 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >>> >>> Sorry for the additional email, but this is particularly interesting: it >>> occurred to me that I'd never tried the reverse setup, so I put the KX3 >> in >>> transmit mode and 0.1W on AM in another room, and set the K3S on receive. >>> And sure enough, the K3S immediately started picking up S40 of buzzing >>> noise. However if I tune the K3S to an AM broadcast station or WWV, no >>> buzz. So either both the K3S and KX3 are being affected on transmit in >> the >>> same way (which seems implausible but not impossible), or possibly >>> something else is going on at my QTH. >>> >>> On the P3, I definitely see the noise when the KX3 is transmitting from >> the >>> other room. >>> >>> Now I wish I had a scope so I could see what the AM carrier generated by >>> the KX3 and K3S looks like so I could tell if this is something that's >>> happening inside the transmitter, or something that is happening because >> of >>> some outside influence mixing powerline noise with the AM carrier. The >>> important thing to me is that the carrier I'm putting out there is >> clean... >>> if there's some local mixing that happens that means I can't listen to my >>> own transmission without a buzz, I can live with that. >>> >>> One kind of curious thing is that there's also a superimposed "squeaky >>> wheel" sound at random intervals detectable when the KX3 is transmitting >> an >>> AM carrier, and not otherwise, and also not when listening to WWV or AM >>> broadcast, which vaguely seems to correlate with how windy it is at any >>> given moment. Could all of this be a "rusty bolt" effect from something >> in >>> the vicinity? >>> >>> Nick >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 18:11, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >>>> >>>> A few more data points: >>>> >>>> Changing TX EQ, including cutting the first 4 bands all the way down to >>>> -16 had no effect on the received signal. >>>> >>>> Plugging in some headphones, turning the TX Monitor up all the way, I >>>> don't detect the hum in the TX monitor signal either in TX test mode, >>>> transmitting into a dummy load, or even transmitting into the antenna >> with >>>> very low power. If I turn up the Line In level, I just hear expected >> white >>>> noise on the TX monitor. So at least as far along the path as the TX >>>> monitor, there's no hum or buzz introduced. >>>> >>>> Switching the receiver (a KX3) to USB mode and using one leg of a >>>> buddistick as an antenna so I can walk around, the noise received around >>>> the house and outside is around S4 when transmitting about 100mW into >> the >>>> antenna, though it varies some as I walk around. >>>> >>>> I do have a set of power lines running through my back yard, and where I >>>> live in San Mateo, you're always near somebody's wiring for something, >>>> unfortunately... my neighbor's south wall is possibly as far as 8 feet >> away >>>> from my north wall, etc. >>>> >>>> It looks like two phases running along the top, then a transformer to >> two >>>> phases and a neutral along the bottom, to which people's houses are >>>> connected. >>>> >>>> We also have underground utilities on our street, including a big green >>>> transformer that sits in the corner of our front lawn. >>>> >>>> I think the next test will be to take the K3S and the KX3 some distance >>>> away from all of these things and see if the hum goes away, and if it >> does, >>>> then figure out what thing the K3S needs to get away from in particular. >>>> If it's the powerlines in my back yard or the transformer in my front >> yard, >>>> then that'll be a difficult problem. >>>> >>>> Nick >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 17:28, Bob McGraw K4TAX >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes but the EQ is in the digital path. The EQ should be done there, >>>>> preferably after the MIC input. The AM BW does not attenuate the end >> like >>>>> the SSB filter. >>>>> >>>>> I suggest -16 dB on the first 3 bands. >>>>> >>>>> Bob, K4TAX >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:38 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Flat, except I turned the first one down a few notches, which doesn't >>>>>> really do much in my case because both the microphone and mixer that I >>>>> use >>>>>> (when they're actually connected) roll off below 150 and 80 Hz >>>>>> respectively. It had previously been suggested to me that rolling off >>>>> low >>>>>> frequency cruft is a good idea for AM and SSB. >>>>>> >>>>>> Nick >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 15:57, Bob McGraw K4TAX >>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I recall commenting earlier. What TX EQ values are being used for >> AM. >>>>> ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Bob, K4TAX >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 5:48 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My desk in this case sits adjacent a wall, and there's only a shower >>>>> on >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> other side of that wall. I did turn off everything in the vicinity >> of >>>>>>> the >>>>>>>> desk and all the lights in the room (I've in fact heard a very >> similar >>>>>>> hum >>>>>>>> from the switching power supply for my mixer, and my first thought >>>>> was it >>>>>>>> was this that was being picked up), but I didn't turn off the >>>>> computer on >>>>>>>> the other side of the room. In this case it will be easier to move >>>>> the >>>>>>> rig >>>>>>>> outdoors with a battery than it will be to turn that computer off >> for >>>>> the >>>>>>>> moment. It would have to be an impressively/obnoxiously strong >>>>> magnetic >>>>>>>> field from that side of the room to influence the transformers >> inside >>>>> the >>>>>>>> rig 8 feet away, but it's worth trying and simple enough to rule it >>>>> out. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Nick >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:51, Don Wilhelm >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> In addition to operating from a battery isolated from the solar >>>>> system, >>>>>>>>> I would recommend that you do a quick test - remove all cables from >>>>> the >>>>>>>>> K3S except the power cable and a coax to a dummy load. Power down >>>>> all >>>>>>>>> power supplies in your station, including any desk lamps. >>>>>>>>> Go into Transmit by tapping the XMIT button. >>>>>>>>> Is the hum still present? If not, then start connecting things to >>>>> your >>>>>>>>> K3S one at a time, doing the same test after each thing connected. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Of course, if the hum is present with nothing connected, contact >>>>>>>>> support at elecraft.com - but I cannot imagine a hum with harmonics >> of >>>>> 60 >>>>>>>>> Hz being induced if you take away all the 60 Hz operated sources in >>>>> the >>>>>>>>> area. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 73, >>>>>>>>> Don W3FPR >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> *N6OL* >>>>>>>> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't >>>>> make >>>>>>> it >>>>>>>> real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is >>>>> not >>>>>>>> worth supporting. >>>>>>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>>>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> *N6OL* >>>>>> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't >>>>> make it >>>>>> real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is >> not >>>>>> worth supporting. >>>>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>>>> >>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *N6OL* >>>> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make >>>> it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is >> not >>>> worth supporting. >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> *N6OL* >>> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make >> it >>> real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not >>> worth supporting. >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >> >> >> > > -- > *N6OL* > Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it > real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not > worth supporting. > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From cx7tt at 4email.net Fri Apr 26 22:57:43 2019 From: cx7tt at 4email.net (cx7tt at 4email.net) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 21:57:43 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such Message-ID: My favorite from the southern US is "fixing": as in 'I'm fixing to leave'= getting ready to go. One of the premier wordsmiths, Winston Churchill is spinning in his grave. Good yucks, 73 Tom HP1XT From k2asp at kanafi.org Fri Apr 26 23:00:22 2019 From: k2asp at kanafi.org (Phil Kane) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:00:22 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] [K2] Rig Control Error In-Reply-To: References: <09433121-ba3c-5393-cdcd-fbc58d47b213@kanafi.org> Message-ID: <436e7106-5809-ddfc-0c46-e578c35aaf3c@kanafi.org> I wish to thank all the folks here who offered helpful comments on the problem. Yes, I did all the checking of ports and drivers and connections - I've been dealing with those sort of things for years so I've been there, but with no resolution this time. Neil did relate his solution to the problem and I will respectfully continue with him off-line as to the details. Again, thanks for the assist.-- 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 >From a Clearing in the Silicon Forest Beaverton (Washington County) Oregon From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Fri Apr 26 23:19:06 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:19:06 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> <3F7D0A22-0B4F-448D-B298-F642DEE1065B@blomand.net> Message-ID: <3588cd10-a0fd-d54e-2b4d-430dfe099644@audiosystemsgroup.com> On 4/26/2019 6:11 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > Plugging in some headphones, turning the TX Monitor up all the way, I don't > detect the hum in the TX monitor signal either in TX test mode, > transmitting into a dummy load, or even transmitting into the antenna with > very low power. If I turn up the Line In level, I just hear expected white > noise on the TX monitor. So at least as far along the path as the TX > monitor, there's no hum or buzz introduced. I'm confused, Nick. Under what conditions DO you hear the buzz? Antenna connected to the K3S? > Switching the receiver (a KX3) to USB mode and using one leg of a > buddistick as an antenna so I can walk around, the noise received around > the house and outside is around S4 when transmitting about 100mW into the > antenna, though it varies some as I walk around. I'm more confused.? When you have been listening to your signal and hearing the buzz, HOW were you listening to it?? Were you listening on the KX3??? If you transmit 5-10W into a dummy load you should be able to hear your signal in a KX3 sitting next to it with NO antenna. Does the buzz only happen when you're listening on the KX3 and there's an antenna connected to the K3S?? That brings up the possibility of passive intermod.? We'll talk about that after we've gotten the symptoms straight. 73, Jim K9YC From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Fri Apr 26 23:20:30 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 20:20:30 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: <410FDDA6-4C99-49FB-8DED-5D75AB1A5D1E@gmail.com> References: <1556314612337-0.post@n2.nabble.com> <53afe063-572a-b47d-e273-2a3155abde00@embarqmail.com> <3F7D0A22-0B4F-448D-B298-F642DEE1065B@blomand.net> <3759A50D-1A10-47A7-BB58-DD824A5783D3@blomand.net> <410FDDA6-4C99-49FB-8DED-5D75AB1A5D1E@gmail.com> Message-ID: <63259a79-a528-f994-f7b5-ca33938465aa@audiosystemsgroup.com> On 4/26/2019 7:48 PM, Frank Krozel wrote: > Try switching to a linear supply? No, ALL power supplies with cap input filter have harmonics. But the problem is FAR, FAR larger than equipment in the shack. Nick -- what kind of mic do you use with your rig? Is it an electret or a dynamic?? Another way of asking -- do you have turn on bias to make it work? Does the? buzz get worse with the mic plugged in? Does turning up the mic gain make it louder? 73, Jim From donovanf at starpower.net Sat Apr 27 01:44:03 2019 From: donovanf at starpower.net (donovanf at starpower.net) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 01:44:03 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <1878340975.10530149.1556343843951.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> Hi Nick, Since there are many unknowns and concerns about the EMI and magnetic environment at your home QTH, it might be revealing to repeat your basic tests (battery and dummy load) at a friend's QTH. Maybe you also have a friend who owns a K3 or K3S. Forget about resetting your transceiver. Your varied descriptions point to EMI or one (or more) strong magnetic fields as the source of your difficulties. How far is the "big green transformer" from your ham shack? Have you ever attempted to perform this type of troubleshooting in the past? Y our emails leave the impression that your approach isn't very methodical. A friend with troubleshooting experience could be of great help in getting you organized for a successful result. 73 Frank W3LPL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nicklas Johnson" To: "elecraft" Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 1:53:27 AM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM Sorry for the additional email, but this is particularly interesting: it occurred to me that I'd never tried the reverse setup, so I put the KX3 in transmit mode and 0.1W on AM in another room, and set the K3S on receive. And sure enough, the K3S immediately started picking up S40 of buzzing noise. However if I tune the K3S to an AM broadcast station or WWV, no buzz. So either both the K3S and KX3 are being affected on transmit in the same way (which seems implausible but not impossible), or possibly something else is going on at my QTH. On the P3, I definitely see the noise when the KX3 is transmitting from the other room. Now I wish I had a scope so I could see what the AM carrier generated by the KX3 and K3S looks like so I could tell if this is something that's happening inside the transmitter, or something that is happening because of some outside influence mixing powerline noise with the AM carrier. The important thing to me is that the carrier I'm putting out there is clean... if there's some local mixing that happens that means I can't listen to my own transmission without a buzz, I can live with that. One kind of curious thing is that there's also a superimposed "squeaky wheel" sound at random intervals detectable when the KX3 is transmitting an AM carrier, and not otherwise, and also not when listening to WWV or AM broadcast, which vaguely seems to correlate with how windy it is at any given moment. Could all of this be a "rusty bolt" effect from something in the vicinity? Nick On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 18:11, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > A few more data points: > > Changing TX EQ, including cutting the first 4 bands all the way down to > -16 had no effect on the received signal. > > Plugging in some headphones, turning the TX Monitor up all the way, I > don't detect the hum in the TX monitor signal either in TX test mode, > transmitting into a dummy load, or even transmitting into the antenna with > very low power. If I turn up the Line In level, I just hear expected white > noise on the TX monitor. So at least as far along the path as the TX > monitor, there's no hum or buzz introduced. > > Switching the receiver (a KX3) to USB mode and using one leg of a > buddistick as an antenna so I can walk around, the noise received around > the house and outside is around S4 when transmitting about 100mW into the > antenna, though it varies some as I walk around. > > I do have a set of power lines running through my back yard, and where I > live in San Mateo, you're always near somebody's wiring for something, > unfortunately... my neighbor's south wall is possibly as far as 8 feet away > from my north wall, etc. > > It looks like two phases running along the top, then a transformer to two > phases and a neutral along the bottom, to which people's houses are > connected. > > We also have underground utilities on our street, including a big green > transformer that sits in the corner of our front lawn. > > I think the next test will be to take the K3S and the KX3 some distance > away from all of these things and see if the hum goes away, and if it does, > then figure out what thing the K3S needs to get away from in particular. > If it's the powerlines in my back yard or the transformer in my front yard, > then that'll be a difficult problem. > > Nick > > > > On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 17:28, Bob McGraw K4TAX > wrote: > >> Yes but the EQ is in the digital path. The EQ should be done there, >> preferably after the MIC input. The AM BW does not attenuate the end like >> the SSB filter. >> >> I suggest -16 dB on the first 3 bands. >> >> Bob, K4TAX >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:38 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >> > >> > Flat, except I turned the first one down a few notches, which doesn't >> > really do much in my case because both the microphone and mixer that I >> use >> > (when they're actually connected) roll off below 150 and 80 Hz >> > respectively. It had previously been suggested to me that rolling off >> low >> > frequency cruft is a good idea for AM and SSB. >> > >> > Nick >> > >> >> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 15:57, Bob McGraw K4TAX >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I recall commenting earlier. What TX EQ values are being used for AM. >> ? >> >> >> >> Bob, K4TAX >> >> >> >> >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> >> >>> On Apr 26, 2019, at 5:48 PM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: >> >>> >> >>> My desk in this case sits adjacent a wall, and there's only a shower >> on >> >> the >> >>> other side of that wall. I did turn off everything in the vicinity of >> >> the >> >>> desk and all the lights in the room (I've in fact heard a very similar >> >> hum >> >>> from the switching power supply for my mixer, and my first thought >> was it >> >>> was this that was being picked up), but I didn't turn off the >> computer on >> >>> the other side of the room. In this case it will be easier to move >> the >> >> rig >> >>> outdoors with a battery than it will be to turn that computer off for >> the >> >>> moment. It would have to be an impressively/obnoxiously strong >> magnetic >> >>> field from that side of the room to influence the transformers inside >> the >> >>> rig 8 feet away, but it's worth trying and simple enough to rule it >> out. >> >>> >> >>> Nick >> >>> >> >>>> On Fri, 26 Apr 2019 at 14:51, Don Wilhelm >> >> wrote: >> >>>> >> >>>> In addition to operating from a battery isolated from the solar >> system, >> >>>> I would recommend that you do a quick test - remove all cables from >> the >> >>>> K3S except the power cable and a coax to a dummy load. Power down >> all >> >>>> power supplies in your station, including any desk lamps. >> >>>> Go into Transmit by tapping the XMIT button. >> >>>> Is the hum still present? If not, then start connecting things to >> your >> >>>> K3S one at a time, doing the same test after each thing connected. >> >>>> >> >>>> Of course, if the hum is present with nothing connected, contact >> >>>> support at elecraft.com - but I cannot imagine a hum with harmonics of >> 60 >> >>>> Hz being induced if you take away all the 60 Hz operated sources in >> the >> >>>> area. >> >>>> >> >>>> 73, >> >>>> Don W3FPR >> >>>> >> >>>> -- >> >>> *N6OL* >> >>> Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't >> make >> >> it >> >>> real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is >> not >> >>> worth supporting. >> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >> >>> Elecraft mailing list >> >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >>> >> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > *N6OL* >> > Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't >> make it >> > real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not >> > worth supporting. >> > ______________________________________________________________ >> > Elecraft mailing list >> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> > >> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > >> >> >> > > -- > *N6OL* > Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make > it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not > worth supporting. > -- *N6OL* Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not worth supporting. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Sat Apr 27 04:19:03 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 01:19:03 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: <1878340975.10530149.1556343843951.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> References: <1878340975.10530149.1556343843951.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> Message-ID: On 4/26/2019 10:44 PM, donovanf at starpower.net wrote: > Y our emails leave the impression that your approach > isn't very methodical. Yes, but that lack of methodical troubleshooting is the result of most hams being weak on the fundamentals of fields and passive IM, instead seeing problems in the light of RFI and mythical concepts like "ground loops." The two causes I've come around to smelling in this problem are passive IM (which Frank reminded me of) and power-related fields. And Frank's advice is right on. 73, Jim K9YC From c-hawley at illinois.edu Sat Apr 27 09:21:04 2019 From: c-hawley at illinois.edu (hawley, charles j jr) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:21:04 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such In-Reply-To: <20f219b3-6d27-d08d-1a1d-a38c8ae1f482@ve3syb.ca> References: <5CA276D4-2474-4955-B32A-8E93FED75D7C@gmail.com> , <20f219b3-6d27-d08d-1a1d-a38c8ae1f482@ve3syb.ca> Message-ID: I think that's incorrect...but little appreciated. https://writingexplained.org/biannual-vs-semiannual-difference [https://writingexplained.org/wp-content/uploads/biannual-versus-semiannual-meaning.png] Biannual vs. Semiannual ? What?s the Difference? - Writing Explained - Grammar, Style, and Usage - Writing Explained When to Use Biennial. What does biennial mean? A third adjective, biennial, describes something that occurs every other year.This term is often confused with biannual due to their similarity in spelling.. Here are some examples of biennial in a sentence,. The San Francisco Giants had to forgo their biennial trip to the World Series in 2016. writingexplained.org Chuck Hawley c-hawley at illinois.edu Amateur Radio, KE9UW ________________________________ From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of Kevin Cozens Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 3:46 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Of words and such On 2019-04-26 1:29 p.m., Wayne Burdick wrote: > Some English words have become completely useless in practice, like > "semiannual" and "biannual," either of which can mean "twice a year" or > "every other year." In fact if you look up the definition for one, you > often see the other shown as a synonym. The problem is due to people using words without understanding heir meaning. There should be no confusion between semiannual and biannual. semi means half, and bi is two. If you want to really find out how messed up is the English language and the definitions of words, start solving cryptic crossword puzzles. Some words have three completely different sets of meanings. -- Cheers! Kevin. http://www.ve3syb.ca/ | "Nerds make the shiny things that https://www.patreon.com/KevinCozens | distract the mouth-breathers, and | that's why we're powerful" Owner of Elecraft K2 #2172 | #include | --Chris Hardwick ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From dave at nk7z.net Sat Apr 27 10:18:04 2019 From: dave at nk7z.net (Dave Cole (NK7Z)) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 07:18:04 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such In-Reply-To: <2031901563.9957180.1556316518363.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> References: <2031901563.9957180.1556316518363.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> Message-ID: <8fbeda23-cb9e-053a-ab1e-e5f47d50ca08@nk7z.net> Now that is funny! 73s and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Technical Specialist ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resource On 4/26/19 3:08 PM, donovanf at starpower.net wrote: > It especially depends on what part of the world you're in... > > > Years ago Mmy wife Phyllis and I spent a weekend visiting Al G3FXB > and his XYL Maud. I'll never forget Phyllis' astonishment when, after > a long night of enjoyable conversation and when she was ready for > bed, Al asked: > > > When would you like me to knock you up tomorrow? > > > 73 > Frank > W3LPL > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Don Wilhelm" > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 9:25:44 PM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Of words and such > > It likely depends on which area of the US you are in. > I don't know about the current vernacular, but where I grew up in > Central Eastern Ohio in the 1950s and 1960s, cigarettes were known as > "fags", and a 'fag break' would be a perfectly acceptable expression. > > I once heard a broadcast from KDKA in Pittsburg, PA where several > language expressions that were unique to that area were cited. The one > that sticks in my mind is "chuckle" referring to a pothole in the road. > A lot depends on the context. I remember my Grandmother referring to > "Go dowm celler to do the wershing" on Mondays. > > Even within the USA, there is a wide variety of local expressions like > that. When I first moved to NC, I did a 2nd take the first time I heard > someone say they had to "carry their Mother to the doctor"! > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > > > On 4/26/2019 4:53 PM, Andy McMullin via Elecraft wrote: >> You are so right. So many people seem to guess what words or phrases mean without bothering to determine what the rest of society agrees that they mean. Then they expect you to understand their personal interpretation. >> >> However, I?d add that it?s also useful to remember George Bernard Shaw and his ?two countries divided by a common language?. Try suggesting a ?fag break? to workers in the USA (as I did one coffee time in the 1970?s). >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From dave at nk7z.net Sat Apr 27 10:19:16 2019 From: dave at nk7z.net (Dave Cole (NK7Z)) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 07:19:16 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such In-Reply-To: <7e519f9d-8e47-441a-e2a7-9361c3733b30@kanafi.org> References: <5CA276D4-2474-4955-B32A-8E93FED75D7C@gmail.com> <3DD5B73D-D795-4431-BC1E-55F19DE79122@rickham.net> <9E0C2BC2-9349-4689-9453-D44B77BADD38@elecraft.com> <7e519f9d-8e47-441a-e2a7-9361c3733b30@kanafi.org> Message-ID: <461dc815-8ab5-36f2-8b64-b0d29091fa9e@nk7z.net> Phil, You nitpicker you! :) Was good to see you in PDX last week! 73s and thanks, Dave (NK7Z) https://www.nk7z.net ARRL Technical Specialist ARRL Volunteer Examiner ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resource On 4/26/19 11:22 AM, Phil Kane wrote: > On 4/26/2019 11:01 AM, Wayne Burdick wrote: > >>> Wayne was right, I meant that Eric had gone way beyond what was >>> expected, in a good way. My understanding of the phrase was it >>> meant beyond bad things and into the good. Sorry if you saw it >>> otherwise. Guess I better watch out for the wordsmiths. >> >> Or worse, wordsmith wannabees, like me :) >> > > But but but.... as I pound into the engineers working for me - be very > careful with the stuff that you commit to reports and papers - we may be > held to exactly that in the case of disputes. Color me nitpicker.... :)-- > > 73 de K2ASP - Phil Kane > Elecraft K2/100 s/n 5402 > > VP - General Counsel & Engineering Manager > CSI Telecommunications, Inc. - Consulting Engineers > San Francisco, CA - Beaverton, OR > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From donw4cbs at gmail.com Sat Apr 27 10:21:44 2019 From: donw4cbs at gmail.com (donw4cbs) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 10:21:44 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Of Words and such Message-ID: <5cc4657a.1c69fb81.f4485.7d0f@mx.google.com> When I first moved to northern Florida in the late 60/s I did a double take when someone riding with me asked if they could crack my window.Don, W4CBS?Sent from my Sprint Samsung Galaxy Note9. From jrichards at k8jhr.com Sat Apr 27 13:02:33 2019 From: jrichards at k8jhr.com (Richards) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:02:33 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] Of words and such Message-ID: It appears some members would excuse an obvious mistake, because they concur with what they believe is intended to be a compliment.?? But how do we know for sure what the writer intended to convey?? After all, his words are, in fact, a slur. Words, in general, often often have very specific meanings, as do many technical words in engineering and scientific prose.?? For some professions, e.g., novelists, lawyers, and advocates of all stripes,? words are the very tools of the trade.?? On this reflector, members frequently criticize others for misusing technical words when speaking about radios, yet they would excuse a serious error in other contexts, because they agree with the presumed sentiment. Kudos to the critic who gently, and politely asked whether the writer truly intended the opposite of what he likely intended to say.? Shame on those who would misuse some words, while admonishing the misuse of technical words. You can rationalize as you like - fact is, the original post is a slur, and we should not criticize the critic - who is, in fact, correct ! Just MY take.??? K8JHR From jwin1048 at gmail.com Sat Apr 27 13:32:11 2019 From: jwin1048 at gmail.com (John Wingard) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:32:11 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 VCO Alignment Issue Message-ID: Working on my 2nd K2 (S/N 7869) and have run into a problem with the VCO alignment. I'm getting a constant 8.37 V at R30 at 4.000 MHz.. I cannot change it with the full range of L30. Correct type inductor is installed at L30. Dropping the VFO down to 3.500 doesn't change it either. I have gone back through the archives and read just about every post concerning this problem but nothing I have tried has made any difference. I have double checked all correct parts placements and orientations, re-flowed all connections in the quadrant of the board around the VCO section. T5 is wound as per the manual (from the Toroid Guy) and installed correctly. I have tried both spreading and compressing the turns on T5 with no change either way. Regarding the thermistor board, I have 4.18 V on pin 5 of U6. Test in the previous section were within specs: 4 MHz Oscillator Cal using CAL FCTR was 12099.61 and confirmed with an external counter. Range of the PLL reference oscillator: 12099.61 - 12086.01 = 13.59 kHz VCO oscillator test: 8162.60 MHz I'm about out of ideas at this point. What should I start checking next? Thanks for any help! 73 de John, WB4GLJ From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sat Apr 27 13:57:22 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:57:22 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 VCO Alignment Issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <35dc40ba-9a64-8875-25f4-cb0e3e3c0be3@embarqmail.com> John, That high voltage is trying to reduce the capacity of the varactors. Which means there is either too much capacity or too much inductance in the circuit. Check the value of C72 first - it should be marked "271". Then set the L30 slug to about mid-position and spread the red turns of T5 enough so the starting and ending turns are adjacent. What is the voltage when tuned to 4000 kHz? Measure the frequency at TP1 - it should be near 8913 kHz. Then change to 40 meters - 7100 kHz - What is the R30 voltage and what is the VFO frequency measured at TP1. The answer to those questions will help in determining what to do next. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/27/2019 1:32 PM, John Wingard wrote: > Working on my 2nd K2 (S/N 7869) and have run into a problem with the VCO > alignment. I'm getting a constant 8.37 V at R30 at 4.000 MHz.. I cannot > change it with the full range of L30. Correct type inductor is installed at > L30. Dropping the VFO down to 3.500 doesn't change it either. I have gone > back through the archives and read just about every post concerning this > problem but nothing I have tried has made any difference. I have double > checked all correct parts placements and orientations, re-flowed all > connections in the quadrant of the board around the VCO section. T5 is > wound as per the manual (from the Toroid Guy) and installed correctly. I > have tried both spreading and compressing the turns on T5 with no change > either way. > > Regarding the thermistor board, I have 4.18 V on pin 5 of U6. > > Test in the previous section were within specs: > > 4 MHz Oscillator Cal using CAL FCTR was 12099.61 and confirmed with an > external counter. > Range of the PLL reference oscillator: 12099.61 - 12086.01 = 13.59 kHz > VCO oscillator test: 8162.60 MHz > > I'm about out of ideas at this point. What should I start checking next? > > Thanks for any help! > > 73 de John, WB4GLJ > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From nick at n6ol.us Sat Apr 27 14:31:53 2019 From: nick at n6ol.us (Nicklas Johnson) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 11:31:53 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: <1878340975.10530149.1556343843951.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> Message-ID: I don't think that "collecting data" and "process of elimination" are particularly ANTI-methodical either. But the fact is that most people will never encounter this kind of problem and don't spend their days practicing how to troubleshoot it, so they seek advice from people who do have experience. Thus this email thread, which began with my thinking I'd developed an audio fault in the rig and seeking advice, but successive tests have pointed in other directions. To answer Jim's earlier question, yes, it does appear that transmitting an unmodulated AM carrier from the K3S into anything resembling an antenna yields a buzz on the KX3 receiver (and vice-versa). The buzz is NOT audible when listening to the K3S's own TX monitor. And to answer Frank's question, the PG&E transformer in our front yard for the underground utilities is approximately 30 horizontal feet over and 6 vertical feet down from the station. The distance to the utilities that run through the back of our lot is approximately 60 feet. I spent the morning reviewing (again) materials on grounding and bonding over my morning coffee to see if there's something important I missed, and I also found by repeating it that an earlier test I'd done had given me a misleading/contradictory result-- transmitting into a dummy load immediately adjacent the KX3 receiving it produces a nice, clean signal. I was misled before by the KX3 picking up a different buzz (probably off a wall wart) in the shack when performing this test earlier. (It also helped in this case to put the KX3 into CW mode to detect the unmodulated AM carrier.) FWIW, this morning I also disconnected the bonding between the station's ground rod and the house's utility power and also disconnected the DTV antenna run into the house (which shares the same coax grounding/surge protection bus outside, but of course could find another path to ground over the coax shield via either one of the TV receivers). Doing so eliminated any *direct * connection with the utility power, as I'm still running purely on battery power. This had NO effect on the received buzz. At this point I'm pretty sure this is an environmental issue and not a problem with either rig, so it's probably not appropriate for me to continue to pester the list about it. Thank you again to everyone who offered suggestions and advice. But for posterity, and in case anyone comes along searching the list while debugging a similar problem, here's a list of all the other things that I tried to isolate the problem, none of which had any effect: - Complete disconnection of all other inputs and outputs on the K3S other than the antenna. - Turning off all nearby power supplies. - Setting the input to any other selection (front panel, rear panel, line in) - Setting the line input level to 0, verifying that front and rear panel gains were set to "low" - Running solely on battery power without the solar charge controller - TX EQ settings- cutting the low end completely - Taking the receiver outdoors, away from power supplies - Trying a different transmit antenna (ie, making sure I wasn't having problems with a damaged dipole having the house neutral wiring as one leg) - Temporarily disconnecting the station ground - Temporarily disconnecting the utility bonding from the station's ground rod - Reversing the direction: transmitting with the KX3 into a portable antenna and receiving with the K3S also produced a much more significant buzz What DID yield some useful data: - Transmitting into a dummy load *while* turning off all nearby power supplies and lights with the KX3 immediately adjacent the dummy load: nice, pristine signal - Checking the TX monitor on the K3S: only white noise with the line input and the monitor output turned to maximum while transmitting. What I have yet to do, and will require some more time and effort to organize and implement: - Going portable or to another QTH to test again - Getting a signal report from a distant station to see if this is a local reception problem, or something actually getting into the transmitted signal. Nick On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 01:19, Jim Brown wrote: > On 4/26/2019 10:44 PM, donovanf at starpower.net wrote: > > Y our emails leave the impression that your approach > > isn't very methodical. > > Yes, but that lack of methodical troubleshooting is the result of most > hams being weak on the fundamentals of fields and passive IM, instead > seeing problems in the light of RFI and mythical concepts like "ground > loops." > > The two causes I've come around to smelling in this problem are passive > IM (which Frank reminded me of) and power-related fields. And Frank's > advice is right on. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > -- *N6OL* Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not worth supporting. From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Sat Apr 27 15:34:06 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 12:34:06 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: <1878340975.10530149.1556343843951.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> Message-ID: <450167fc-7661-334b-89ef-1331c6b39ceb@audiosystemsgroup.com> On 4/27/2019 11:31 AM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > To answer Jim's earlier question, yes, it does appear that transmitting an > unmodulated AM carrier from the K3S into anything resembling an antenna > yields a buzz on the KX3 receiver (and vice-versa). The buzz is NOT > audible when listening to the K3S's own TX monitor. OK. Try this test. Running from a battery, no connection to anything grounded, TX into an antenna and listen on the KX3 running on internal batteries, also not connected to anything grounded. Do you hear buzz? If not, walk around until you do. If you do, walk around until it's loudest. What this test is doing is probing for some source of passive intermod. It could be in your own home, or it could be somewhere else. And try this test. Transmit into an antenna and have someone listen to your signal. I see that you're only 36 miles from me, so perhaps I could do that on 75M if you have a suitable antenna. I haven't seen an answer for my question about DC voltage under RX and TX conditions. 73, Jim K9YC From wa6nhc at gmail.com Sat Apr 27 16:02:00 2019 From: wa6nhc at gmail.com (Rick WA6NHC) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 13:02:00 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: References: <1878340975.10530149.1556343843951.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> Message-ID: <789d4ef9-595a-644b-262e-65c16eb7c9d7@gmail.com> What they are saying is that it is best to break things down into logical clear steps, isolating as much as possible to prove or eliminate cause and effect.? The issue are that some folks don't know enough to do this and some have issues trying to be logical; running in circles while others often seek the easy way(s) out. No slur is meant or intended, people have different abilities or we wouldn't need groups like this. This is all best done while the XYL is at the spa or otherwise unavailable for a few hours.? ;-) Here is one example for your situation: A critical and valid test to find the source of your radio problem is to run the radio on battery (no solar, no other wiring including ground) into a dummy load (completely isolated from everything, including any metal table that might be in use) with the house mains (and any outbuildings) turned completely OFF.? Set up the test receiver in the same manner (nothing but different battery for power and another dummy load). This is to determine if it's the radio or the home environment (no stray induction).? If everything is clean, it's probably not the radio but to make sure... The second portion of that test would be to repeat on different bands or frequencies within the band to eliminate 'fundamental overload'? or unexpected mixing of the receiver (which should also be on a dummy load, proximity is likely enough to hear the signal).? Is it band related or single band, on one frequency only or all?? At only certain output power levels (bad internal amp?? A 100 watt K3 has a series of three amps)?? If the radio is clean, skip the next step. The third step (if the problem still exists) is to provide physical isolation of the receiver (another room even if both are on dummy loads) to note any changes (overload or coupling is no longer likely).? If the problem remains, it's a radio issue (don't discount a receiver issue so you can confirm the issue with a second receiver). Then based on these results, if it's all clean, (therefore not a radio issue so more testing is required to find the actual cause) one then determines a potential cause as you re-power the house (breaker by breaker).? In other words, when does it return? In the best case, flipping only one breaker on, testing, turning that breaker off and moving to the next breaker; then bringing multiple breakers on in combinations (interaction of home devices?).? At which point/s does the issue return?? Single breaker means examine everything powered on that circuit, mixed breakers is much more of a challenge to find the cause.? Recall that house wiring often appears 'random' so it may be a challenge to find what each circuit powers. If the problem doesn't return with turning on all the breakers, the search continues. Note changes as you reconnect to the rest of the world (add antennas, control cables, etc) to your station.? Through more testing, at which point does the issue return? Then reset all the clocks in the house as you ponder the results. With an antenna connected, this series of tests also gives you a good baseline for RF noise reduction if the home generates noise (it's guaranteed that it will). In your case, just for giggles, make SURE that ALL the tmp connectors in the K3(s) are properly connected as well (re-seat them) and re-tighten all screws and bolts as well (Murphy lives). While it's opened up, make sure no case paint is in the way of any bonding too, no corrosion, roaming parts etc. and look for obvious failures (disconnected wires, frays or pinched wire all without the smell of escaped smoke). And lastly, a complete reset (groan) is an option, sometimes things are not what they show to be or are expected to be (stuck bits, EEPROM belches...).? Made when the radio is functioning correctly, you DO have a current backup of settings to use, no? If not, you manually make what changes are required (MANY of them, hence the groan) THEN make a backup. Now if there is a need to call for further assistance (Elecraft help line, your Elmer or here), one has (dis)proven some of the possibilities to present the issue. While others may disagree in this content, this is but one path to follow. GL, Rick nhc On 4/27/2019 11:31 AM, Nicklas Johnson wrote: > I don't think that "collecting data" and "process of elimination" are > particularly ANTI-methodical either. But the fact is that most people will > never encounter this kind of problem and don't spend their days practicing > how to troubleshoot it, so they seek advice from people who do have > experience. Thus this email thread, which began with my thinking I'd > developed an audio fault in the rig and seeking advice, but successive > tests have pointed in other directions. > > To answer Jim's earlier question, yes, it does appear that transmitting an > unmodulated AM carrier from the K3S into anything resembling an antenna > yields a buzz on the KX3 receiver (and vice-versa). The buzz is NOT > audible when listening to the K3S's own TX monitor. > > And to answer Frank's question, the PG&E transformer in our front yard for > the underground utilities is approximately 30 horizontal feet over and 6 > vertical feet down from the station. The distance to the utilities that > run through the back of our lot is approximately 60 feet. > > I spent the morning reviewing (again) materials on grounding and bonding > over my morning coffee to see if there's something important I missed, and > I also found by repeating it that an earlier test I'd done had given me a > misleading/contradictory result-- transmitting into a dummy load > immediately adjacent the KX3 receiving it produces a nice, clean signal. I > was misled before by the KX3 picking up a different buzz (probably off a > wall wart) in the shack when performing this test earlier. (It also helped > in this case to put the KX3 into CW mode to detect the unmodulated AM > carrier.) > > FWIW, this morning I also disconnected the bonding between the station's > ground rod and the house's utility power and also disconnected the DTV > antenna run into the house (which shares the same coax grounding/surge > protection bus outside, but of course could find another path to ground > over the coax shield via either one of the TV receivers). Doing so > eliminated any *direct * connection with the utility power, as I'm still > running purely on battery power. This had NO effect on the received buzz. > > At this point I'm pretty sure this is an environmental issue and not a > problem with either rig, so it's probably not appropriate for me to > continue to pester the list about it. Thank you again to everyone who > offered suggestions and advice. > > But for posterity, and in case anyone comes along searching the list while > debugging a similar problem, here's a list of all the other things that I > tried to isolate the problem, none of which had any effect: > > - Complete disconnection of all other inputs and outputs on the K3S > other than the antenna. > - Turning off all nearby power supplies. > - Setting the input to any other selection (front panel, rear panel, > line in) > - Setting the line input level to 0, verifying that front and rear panel > gains were set to "low" > - Running solely on battery power without the solar charge controller > - TX EQ settings- cutting the low end completely > - Taking the receiver outdoors, away from power supplies > - Trying a different transmit antenna (ie, making sure I wasn't having > problems with a damaged dipole having the house neutral wiring as one leg) > - Temporarily disconnecting the station ground > - Temporarily disconnecting the utility bonding from the station's > ground rod > - Reversing the direction: transmitting with the KX3 into a portable > antenna and receiving with the K3S also produced a much more significant > buzz > > What DID yield some useful data: > > - Transmitting into a dummy load *while* turning off all nearby power > supplies and lights with the KX3 immediately adjacent the dummy load: nice, > pristine signal > - Checking the TX monitor on the K3S: only white noise with the line > input and the monitor output turned to maximum while transmitting. > > What I have yet to do, and will require some more time and effort to > organize and implement: > > - Going portable or to another QTH to test again > - Getting a signal report from a distant station to see if this is a > local reception problem, or something actually getting into the transmitted > signal. > > > Nick > From ruler55 at gmail.com Sat Apr 27 16:57:27 2019 From: ruler55 at gmail.com (Robie Elms) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:57:27 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 - Bar Graph Erratic - New symptoms Message-ID: I posted several days ago about the bar graph (s meter & w meter) on my K2 was erratic. I received suggestions suggesting changing the RF gain control and re-doing the S meter calibration. Today i did the following: 1. carefully monitored the audio from K2 as the RF gain control was rotated and found it to be smooth and without dead spots etc. 2. checked the AGC threshold and found it to be 3.8 v. in the CAL S LO mode found the settings to be per the S-meter alignment procedure. 3. in the CAL S HI mode i could not get segments past the 2 left most ones to eliminate. Left adjustment as found 4. In the transmit mode only the 2 left most segments illuminate regardless of the power setting. Placing the Display in RF mode the output power varies smoothly from 0.1 to well over 10 watts. However, the bar graph never illuminates more than the 2 left most segments. 5. this seems to suggest an issue with the front panel board associated with the bar graph display. Any suggestions on next steps, what to look for on the board or other ideas? Thanks in advance, Robie - AJ4F From jwin1048 at gmail.com Sat Apr 27 17:37:09 2019 From: jwin1048 at gmail.com (John Wingard) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:37:09 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 VCO Alignment Issue In-Reply-To: <35dc40ba-9a64-8875-25f4-cb0e3e3c0be3@embarqmail.com> References: <35dc40ba-9a64-8875-25f4-cb0e3e3c0be3@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Don, Thanks for the quick response. I did check C72 again. It is a 271 value. I then spread the red turns on T5 as far as I could. I'd say they cover about 90+% of the toroid. I put the L30 slug at mid-point of travel and measured voltage at R30 and it is still right at 8.37 V. While there I checked the frequency at TP1 and it was 8247.90, which is considerably lower than the 8913 that you expected. Next I went up to 7100 and measured the voltage at R30. Still right at 8.37 V, no change. Frequency at TP1 @ 7100 was 11558.11. So, it appears that the frequency at 4000 is not within the expected range, and likely not at 7100 as well. Hope this tells you something because I'm stumped. I've got some plans for this evening so I may not get back on it until tomorrow afternoon, but if you've got any more things for me to try I will do them then. John, WB4GLJ On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 1:57 PM Don Wilhelm wrote: > John, > > That high voltage is trying to reduce the capacity of the varactors. > Which means there is either too much capacity or too much inductance in > the circuit. > > Check the value of C72 first - it should be marked "271". Then set the > L30 slug to about mid-position and spread the red turns of T5 enough so > the starting and ending turns are adjacent. What is the voltage when > tuned to 4000 kHz? Measure the frequency at TP1 - it should be near > 8913 kHz. > > Then change to 40 meters - 7100 kHz - What is the R30 voltage and what > is the VFO frequency measured at TP1. > > The answer to those questions will help in determining what to do next. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/27/2019 1:32 PM, John Wingard wrote: > > Working on my 2nd K2 (S/N 7869) and have run into a problem with the VCO > > alignment. I'm getting a constant 8.37 V at R30 at 4.000 MHz.. I cannot > > change it with the full range of L30. Correct type inductor is installed > at > > L30. Dropping the VFO down to 3.500 doesn't change it either. I have > gone > > back through the archives and read just about every post concerning this > > problem but nothing I have tried has made any difference. I have double > > checked all correct parts placements and orientations, re-flowed all > > connections in the quadrant of the board around the VCO section. T5 is > > wound as per the manual (from the Toroid Guy) and installed correctly. I > > have tried both spreading and compressing the turns on T5 with no change > > either way. > > > > Regarding the thermistor board, I have 4.18 V on pin 5 of U6. > > > > Test in the previous section were within specs: > > > > 4 MHz Oscillator Cal using CAL FCTR was 12099.61 and confirmed with an > > external counter. > > Range of the PLL reference oscillator: 12099.61 - 12086.01 = 13.59 kHz > > VCO oscillator test: 8162.60 MHz > > > > I'm about out of ideas at this point. What should I start checking next? > > > > Thanks for any help! > > > > 73 de John, WB4GLJ > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > From rocketnj at gmail.com Sat Apr 27 17:48:59 2019 From: rocketnj at gmail.com (rocketnj at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:48:59 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high Message-ID: <00f601d4fd43$05b26300$11172900$@gmail.com> Hi All, KPA-1500 s/n 423 Operating 80 meter SSB running 20 watts drive with tuner engaged for about 1240 watts out PEP. Remote app shows maximum power handling of 1620 watts. Out of nowhere I got an input power too high alarm @ 191 watts! The radio is capable of 100 watts out max and verified is set to 20 watts. Set tune power to 10 watts. Meter in amp during standby reads 10 watts. Switch to operate and immediately get input power too high alarm @ 91 watts. Switch to 20 meters (resonant antenna). No issue - 10 watts tune is approximately 400 watts out with no error. Any ideas? Dave wo2x From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sat Apr 27 18:00:14 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 18:00:14 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 VCO Alignment Issue In-Reply-To: References: <35dc40ba-9a64-8875-25f4-cb0e3e3c0be3@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <9cf860ff-26eb-ae10-2aef-fa316a077bdb@embarqmail.com> John, Both frequencies are too low. You have either too much capacitance or too much inductance in the VFO.? Count the number of times the red wire goes through the center of the T5 core - it should be 16. Check relays K13, K14 and K15 for solder bridges. Make sure the core of T5 is yellow. You might have to try removing a turn from T5 if you can find no other cause - there have been a few K2s in the long past where the permeability if the T5 core was higher than expected, and removing 1 turn from T5 corrected things - I have not seen that recently, but I do mention it 'just in case'. If all else fails, you may have to "wind your way" through the relay connections for the VFO Range Select area using the Relay Table on the Schematic Key page as your guide for the paths through the relays. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/27/2019 5:37 PM, John Wingard wrote: > Hi Don, > > Thanks for the quick response. I did check C72 again. It is a 271 > value. I then spread the red turns on T5 as far as I could. I'd say > they cover about 90+% of the toroid. I put the L30 slug at mid-point > of travel and measured voltage at R30 and it is still right at 8.37 > V.? While there I checked the frequency at TP1 and it was 8247.90, > which is considerably lower than the 8913 that you expected. > > Next I went up to 7100 and measured the voltage at R30. Still right at > 8.37 V, no change. Frequency at TP1?@ 7100 was 11558.11. > > So, it appears that the frequency at 4000 is not within the expected > range, and likely not at 7100 as well. Hope this tells you something > because I'm stumped. > I've got some plans for this evening so I may not get back on it until > tomorrow afternoon, but if you've got any more things for me to try I > will do them then. > > John, WB4GLJ > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 1:57 PM Don Wilhelm > wrote: > > John, > > That high voltage is trying to reduce the capacity of the varactors. > Which means there is either too much capacity or too much > inductance in > the circuit. > > Check the value of C72 first - it should be marked "271". Then set > the > L30 slug to about mid-position and spread the red turns of T5 > enough so > the starting and ending turns are adjacent.? What is the voltage when > tuned to 4000 kHz?? Measure the frequency at TP1 - it should be near > 8913 kHz. > > Then change to 40 meters - 7100 kHz - What is the R30 voltage and > what > is the VFO frequency measured at TP1. > > The answer to those questions will help in determining what to do > next. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/27/2019 1:32 PM, John Wingard wrote: > > Working on my 2nd K2 (S/N 7869) and have run into a problem with > the VCO > > alignment. I'm getting a constant 8.37 V at R30? at 4.000 MHz.. > I cannot > > change it with the full range of L30. Correct type inductor is > installed at > > L30.? Dropping the VFO down to 3.500 doesn't change it either. I > have gone > > back through the archives and read just about every post > concerning this > > problem but nothing I have tried has made any difference. I have > double > > checked all correct parts placements and orientations, re-flowed all > > connections in the quadrant of the board around the VCO section. > T5 is > > wound as per the manual (from the Toroid Guy) and installed > correctly. I > > have tried both spreading and compressing the turns on T5 with > no change > > either way. > > > > Regarding the thermistor board,? I have 4.18 V on pin 5 of U6. > > > > Test in the previous section were within specs: > > > > 4 MHz Oscillator Cal using CAL FCTR was 12099.61 and confirmed > with an > > external counter. > > Range of the PLL reference oscillator: 12099.61 - 12086.01 = > 13.59 kHz > > VCO oscillator test: 8162.60 MHz > > > > I'm about out of ideas at this point. What should I start > checking next? > > > > Thanks for any help! > > > > 73 de John, WB4GLJ > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sat Apr 27 18:07:58 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 18:07:58 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high In-Reply-To: <00f601d4fd43$05b26300$11172900$@gmail.com> References: <00f601d4fd43$05b26300$11172900$@gmail.com> Message-ID: What are you using to drive the KPA1500? Connect the driving transceiver to an external wattmeter, and then to a dummy load. Do a KeyDown in CW mode and see what the actual power output is shown on the external wattmeter. My thinking is that your driving transceiver has lost its ability to control the power output. Do the test with an external wattmeter and a dummy load rather than depending on the power indications from either the KPA1500 or the driving transceiver. In other words, check each piece of gear one piece at a time. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/27/2019 5:48 PM, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: > Hi All, > > > > KPA-1500 s/n 423 > > > > Operating 80 meter SSB running 20 watts drive with tuner engaged for about > 1240 watts out PEP. Remote app shows maximum power handling of 1620 watts. > > Out of nowhere I got an input power too high alarm @ 191 watts! The radio is > capable of 100 watts out max and verified is set to 20 watts. > > > > Set tune power to 10 watts. > > Meter in amp during standby reads 10 watts. > > Switch to operate and immediately get input power too high alarm @ 91 watts. > > > > Switch to 20 meters (resonant antenna). No issue - 10 watts tune is > approximately 400 watts out with no error. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Dave wo2x > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From donanddeena at hotmail.com Sat Apr 27 18:10:43 2019 From: donanddeena at hotmail.com (Don Schroder) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 22:10:43 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 VCO Alignment Issue In-Reply-To: <9cf860ff-26eb-ae10-2aef-fa316a077bdb@embarqmail.com> References: <35dc40ba-9a64-8875-25f4-cb0e3e3c0be3@embarqmail.com> <9cf860ff-26eb-ae10-2aef-fa316a077bdb@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Don, I?m sure you remember that my K2 kit (serial 7818) experienced the exact same issue. I went through all of your suggestions without any success. My K2 is now in the hands of Elecraft Support. I?m hoping they will find a solution to my (and John?s) issue. Just a FYI. Many thanks for all of your help! 73 Don, KE0PVQ Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: Don Wilhelm Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 5:01 PM To: John Wingard Cc: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K2 VCO Alignment Issue John, Both frequencies are too low. You have either too much capacitance or too much inductance in the VFO. Count the number of times the red wire goes through the center of the T5 core - it should be 16. Check relays K13, K14 and K15 for solder bridges. Make sure the core of T5 is yellow. You might have to try removing a turn from T5 if you can find no other cause - there have been a few K2s in the long past where the permeability if the T5 core was higher than expected, and removing 1 turn from T5 corrected things - I have not seen that recently, but I do mention it 'just in case'. If all else fails, you may have to "wind your way" through the relay connections for the VFO Range Select area using the Relay Table on the Schematic Key page as your guide for the paths through the relays. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/27/2019 5:37 PM, John Wingard wrote: > Hi Don, > > Thanks for the quick response. I did check C72 again. It is a 271 > value. I then spread the red turns on T5 as far as I could. I'd say > they cover about 90+% of the toroid. I put the L30 slug at mid-point > of travel and measured voltage at R30 and it is still right at 8.37 > V. While there I checked the frequency at TP1 and it was 8247.90, > which is considerably lower than the 8913 that you expected. > > Next I went up to 7100 and measured the voltage at R30. Still right at > 8.37 V, no change. Frequency at TP1 @ 7100 was 11558.11. > > So, it appears that the frequency at 4000 is not within the expected > range, and likely not at 7100 as well. Hope this tells you something > because I'm stumped. > I've got some plans for this evening so I may not get back on it until > tomorrow afternoon, but if you've got any more things for me to try I > will do them then. > > John, WB4GLJ > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 1:57 PM Don Wilhelm > wrote: > > John, > > That high voltage is trying to reduce the capacity of the varactors. > Which means there is either too much capacity or too much > inductance in > the circuit. > > Check the value of C72 first - it should be marked "271". Then set > the > L30 slug to about mid-position and spread the red turns of T5 > enough so > the starting and ending turns are adjacent. What is the voltage when > tuned to 4000 kHz? Measure the frequency at TP1 - it should be near > 8913 kHz. > > Then change to 40 meters - 7100 kHz - What is the R30 voltage and > what > is the VFO frequency measured at TP1. > > The answer to those questions will help in determining what to do > next. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/27/2019 1:32 PM, John Wingard wrote: > > Working on my 2nd K2 (S/N 7869) and have run into a problem with > the VCO > > alignment. I'm getting a constant 8.37 V at R30 at 4.000 MHz.. > I cannot > > change it with the full range of L30. Correct type inductor is > installed at > > L30. Dropping the VFO down to 3.500 doesn't change it either. I > have gone > > back through the archives and read just about every post > concerning this > > problem but nothing I have tried has made any difference. I have > double > > checked all correct parts placements and orientations, re-flowed all > > connections in the quadrant of the board around the VCO section. > T5 is > > wound as per the manual (from the Toroid Guy) and installed > correctly. I > > have tried both spreading and compressing the turns on T5 with > no change > > either way. > > > > Regarding the thermistor board, I have 4.18 V on pin 5 of U6. > > > > Test in the previous section were within specs: > > > > 4 MHz Oscillator Cal using CAL FCTR was 12099.61 and confirmed > with an > > external counter. > > Range of the PLL reference oscillator: 12099.61 - 12086.01 = > 13.59 kHz > > VCO oscillator test: 8162.60 MHz > > > > I'm about out of ideas at this point. What should I start > checking next? > > > > Thanks for any help! > > > > 73 de John, WB4GLJ > > ______________________________________________________________ > > Elecraft mailing list > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From paul at paulbaldock.com Sat Apr 27 18:21:26 2019 From: paul at paulbaldock.com (Paul Baldock) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 15:21:26 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high In-Reply-To: <00f601d4fd43$05b26300$11172900$@gmail.com> References: <00f601d4fd43$05b26300$11172900$@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5cc4d5e7.1c69fb81.8e23c.4020@mx.google.com> Try it in to a dummy load. - Paul At 02:48 PM 4/27/2019, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: >Hi All, > > > >KPA-1500 s/n 423 > > > >Operating 80 meter SSB running 20 watts drive with tuner engaged for about >1240 watts out PEP. Remote app shows maximum power handling of 1620 watts. > >Out of nowhere I got an input power too high alarm @ 191 watts! The radio is >capable of 100 watts out max and verified is set to 20 watts. > > > >Set tune power to 10 watts. > >Meter in amp during standby reads 10 watts. > >Switch to operate and immediately get input power too high alarm @ 91 watts. > > > >Switch to 20 meters (resonant antenna). No issue - 10 watts tune is >approximately 400 watts out with no error. > > > >Any ideas? > > > >Dave wo2x > > > > > > > >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rocketnj at gmail.com Sat Apr 27 18:43:02 2019 From: rocketnj at gmail.com (rocketnj at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 18:43:02 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high In-Reply-To: References: <00f601d4fd43$05b26300$11172900$@gmail.com> Message-ID: <014501d4fd4a$92f87270$b8e95750$@gmail.com> Don, first thing I did. Radio is indeed sending 20 watts on 80 meters. Is a Flex 6600, not capable of 191 watts the amp said it was seeing. The 3 watt, 3k Ohm resistor on the filter board is discolored and one side desoldered itself. This provides RF to the onboard frequency counter. This is the second time in three months that resistor has been an issue. Last time it was discolored and fell off the board (mounted upside down). This time it appears to be more involved than just the 3 watt resistor. Dave wo2x -----Original Message----- From: Don Wilhelm Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 6:08 PM To: rocketnj at gmail.com; elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high What are you using to drive the KPA1500? Connect the driving transceiver to an external wattmeter, and then to a dummy load. Do a KeyDown in CW mode and see what the actual power output is shown on the external wattmeter. My thinking is that your driving transceiver has lost its ability to control the power output. Do the test with an external wattmeter and a dummy load rather than depending on the power indications from either the KPA1500 or the driving transceiver. In other words, check each piece of gear one piece at a time. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/27/2019 5:48 PM, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: > Hi All, > > > > KPA-1500 s/n 423 > > > > Operating 80 meter SSB running 20 watts drive with tuner engaged for about > 1240 watts out PEP. Remote app shows maximum power handling of 1620 watts. > > Out of nowhere I got an input power too high alarm @ 191 watts! The radio is > capable of 100 watts out max and verified is set to 20 watts. > > > > Set tune power to 10 watts. > > Meter in amp during standby reads 10 watts. > > Switch to operate and immediately get input power too high alarm @ 91 watts. > > > > Switch to 20 meters (resonant antenna). No issue - 10 watts tune is > approximately 400 watts out with no error. > > > > Any ideas? > > > > Dave wo2x > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From rocketnj at gmail.com Sat Apr 27 18:48:35 2019 From: rocketnj at gmail.com (rocketnj at gmail.com) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 18:48:35 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high In-Reply-To: <5cc4d5e7.1c69fb81.8e23c.4020@mx.google.com> References: <00f601d4fd43$05b26300$11172900$@gmail.com> <5cc4d5e7.1c69fb81.8e23c.4020@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <014701d4fd4b$59098e40$0b1caac0$@gmail.com> The input too high only happens into a non-resonant load (tuner in circuit). Also noticed on 20 now when tuner is in operate there is a 3 dB drop in noise floor. This is the second time the 3 watt resistor has desoldered itself from the board and both times the resistor is discolored. Only one RF path from radios through switching into amp input. Amp output feeds a 1x4 antenna switch. No other radios transmitting in near proximity. Definitely something failed on filter board. Dave wo2x -----Original Message----- From: Paul Baldock Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 6:21 PM To: rocketnj at gmail.com; elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high Try it in to a dummy load. - Paul At 02:48 PM 4/27/2019, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: >Hi All, > > > >KPA-1500 s/n 423 > > > >Operating 80 meter SSB running 20 watts drive with tuner engaged for >about >1240 watts out PEP. Remote app shows maximum power handling of 1620 watts. > >Out of nowhere I got an input power too high alarm @ 191 watts! The >radio is capable of 100 watts out max and verified is set to 20 watts. > > > >Set tune power to 10 watts. > >Meter in amp during standby reads 10 watts. > >Switch to operate and immediately get input power too high alarm @ 91 watts. > > > >Switch to 20 meters (resonant antenna). No issue - 10 watts tune is >approximately 400 watts out with no error. > > > >Any ideas? > > > >Dave wo2x > > > > > > > >______________________________________________________________ >Elecraft mailing list >Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > >This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email >list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From donwilh at embarqmail.com Sat Apr 27 19:17:13 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 19:17:13 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high In-Reply-To: <014701d4fd4b$59098e40$0b1caac0$@gmail.com> References: <00f601d4fd43$05b26300$11172900$@gmail.com> <5cc4d5e7.1c69fb81.8e23c.4020@mx.google.com> <014701d4fd4b$59098e40$0b1caac0$@gmail.com> Message-ID: Dave, Time to contact support at elecraft.com. Unfortunately, they are only open for the next 45 minutes (unless someone is working late), so be patient while the support folks enjoy their weekend. 73, Don W3FPR On 4/27/2019 6:48 PM, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: > The input too high only happens into a non-resonant load (tuner in circuit). > Also noticed on 20 now when tuner is in operate there is a 3 dB drop in > noise floor. > > This is the second time the 3 watt resistor has desoldered itself from the > board and both times the resistor is discolored. > > Only one RF path from radios through switching into amp input. Amp output > feeds a 1x4 antenna switch. No other radios transmitting in near proximity. > > Definitely something failed on filter board. > > Dave wo2x > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Baldock > Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 6:21 PM > To: rocketnj at gmail.com; elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high > > Try it in to a dummy load. > > - Paul > > At 02:48 PM 4/27/2019, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> >> >> KPA-1500 s/n 423 >> >> >> >> Operating 80 meter SSB running 20 watts drive with tuner engaged for >> about >> 1240 watts out PEP. Remote app shows maximum power handling of 1620 watts. >> >> Out of nowhere I got an input power too high alarm @ 191 watts! The >> radio is capable of 100 watts out max and verified is set to 20 watts. >> >> >> >> Set tune power to 10 watts. >> >> Meter in amp during standby reads 10 watts. >> >> Switch to operate and immediately get input power too high alarm @ 91 > watts. >> >> >> >> Switch to 20 meters (resonant antenna). No issue - 10 watts tune is >> approximately 400 watts out with no error. >> >> >> >> Any ideas? >> >> >> >> Dave wo2x >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email >> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From donovanf at starpower.net Sat Apr 27 19:18:50 2019 From: donovanf at starpower.net (donovanf at starpower.net) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 19:18:50 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <1165928031.12027840.1556407130787.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> Hi Nick, You've done a good job organizing your tests and test results. One more question: how far is your transmitting antenna from your ham shack and other nearby homes? Very telling is this comment at the end of your email: "Transmitting into a dummy load *while* turning off all nearby power supplies and lights with the KX3 immediately adjacent the dummy load: nice, pristine signal" That certainly points to EMC issues in your environment. When you're ready for additional tests, first go back to your pristine signal case. Then -- one by one -- turn additional radio accessories and household on and reconnect them. Repeat your test each time you change something. I strongly suspect that you have a common EMI condition in your ham shack, probably elsewhere in your home and possibly in adjacent homes known as "RF FLOODING." What the heck is RF Flooding? When a strong RF signal enters a non-linear device (semiconductors most commonly, but also ferrites near saturation) that also carries other signals (most commonly AC power, but also computer related signals such as Ethernet), the non-linear device will mix the two signals together and reradiate them (including harmonics of the RF signal) on the wires connected to the non-linear device. Multi-operator and SO2R operator contest stations have experienced RF Flooding interference for decades, but the problem has become much worse as semiconductor devices have proliferated. Switching power supplies are among the worst offenders, especially wall-warts. If you have a RF flooding problem it will be especially apparent on the second and third harmonic of your transmitted signal. On the harmonic frequencies the buzz sidebands may be stronger than the transmitted harmonic. So what to do about it? If you don't intend to operate multi-operator or SO2R contests from your QTH, there's no reason to fix the problem at all. The buzz sidebands probably don't radiate more than a few hundred feet from your QTH. In that case its simply been an EMC learning experience about the consequences of introducing a strong RF field into a houseful of electronics. 73 Frank W3LPL ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nicklas Johnson" To: "elecraft" Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 6:31:53 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM I don't think that "collecting data" and "process of elimination" are particularly ANTI-methodical either. But the fact is that most people will never encounter this kind of problem and don't spend their days practicing how to troubleshoot it, so they seek advice from people who do have experience. Thus this email thread, which began with my thinking I'd developed an audio fault in the rig and seeking advice, but successive tests have pointed in other directions. To answer Jim's earlier question, yes, it does appear that transmitting an unmodulated AM carrier from the K3S into anything resembling an antenna yields a buzz on the KX3 receiver (and vice-versa). The buzz is NOT audible when listening to the K3S's own TX monitor. And to answer Frank's question, the PG&E transformer in our front yard for the underground utilities is approximately 30 horizontal feet over and 6 vertical feet down from the station. The distance to the utilities that run through the back of our lot is approximately 60 feet. I spent the morning reviewing (again) materials on grounding and bonding over my morning coffee to see if there's something important I missed, and I also found by repeating it that an earlier test I'd done had given me a misleading/contradictory result-- transmitting into a dummy load immediately adjacent the KX3 receiving it produces a nice, clean signal. I was misled before by the KX3 picking up a different buzz (probably off a wall wart) in the shack when performing this test earlier. (It also helped in this case to put the KX3 into CW mode to detect the unmodulated AM carrier.) FWIW, this morning I also disconnected the bonding between the station's ground rod and the house's utility power and also disconnected the DTV antenna run into the house (which shares the same coax grounding/surge protection bus outside, but of course could find another path to ground over the coax shield via either one of the TV receivers). Doing so eliminated any *direct * connection with the utility power, as I'm still running purely on battery power. This had NO effect on the received buzz. At this point I'm pretty sure this is an environmental issue and not a problem with either rig, so it's probably not appropriate for me to continue to pester the list about it. Thank you again to everyone who offered suggestions and advice. But for posterity, and in case anyone comes along searching the list while debugging a similar problem, here's a list of all the other things that I tried to isolate the problem, none of which had any effect: - Complete disconnection of all other inputs and outputs on the K3S other than the antenna. - Turning off all nearby power supplies. - Setting the input to any other selection (front panel, rear panel, line in) - Setting the line input level to 0, verifying that front and rear panel gains were set to "low" - Running solely on battery power without the solar charge controller - TX EQ settings- cutting the low end completely - Taking the receiver outdoors, away from power supplies - Trying a different transmit antenna (ie, making sure I wasn't having problems with a damaged dipole having the house neutral wiring as one leg) - Temporarily disconnecting the station ground - Temporarily disconnecting the utility bonding from the station's ground rod - Reversing the direction: transmitting with the KX3 into a portable antenna and receiving with the K3S also produced a much more significant buzz What DID yield some useful data: - Transmitting into a dummy load *while* turning off all nearby power supplies and lights with the KX3 immediately adjacent the dummy load: nice, pristine signal - Checking the TX monitor on the K3S: only white noise with the line input and the monitor output turned to maximum while transmitting. What I have yet to do, and will require some more time and effort to organize and implement: - Going portable or to another QTH to test again - Getting a signal report from a distant station to see if this is a local reception problem, or something actually getting into the transmitted signal. Nick On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 at 01:19, Jim Brown wrote: > On 4/26/2019 10:44 PM, donovanf at starpower.net wrote: > > Y our emails leave the impression that your approach > > isn't very methodical. > > Yes, but that lack of methodical troubleshooting is the result of most > hams being weak on the fundamentals of fields and passive IM, instead > seeing problems in the light of RFI and mythical concepts like "ground > loops." > > The two causes I've come around to smelling in this problem are passive > IM (which Frank reminded me of) and power-related fields. And Frank's > advice is right on. > > 73, Jim K9YC > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > -- *N6OL* Saying something doesn't make it true. Belief in something doesn't make it real. And if you have to lie to support a position, that position is not worth supporting. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rocketnj at gmail.com Sat Apr 27 19:20:31 2019 From: rocketnj at gmail.com (Dave) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 19:20:31 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high In-Reply-To: References: <00f601d4fd43$05b26300$11172900$@gmail.com> <5cc4d5e7.1c69fb81.8e23c.4020@mx.google.com> <014701d4fd4b$59098e40$0b1caac0$@gmail.com> Message-ID: I can wait until tomorrow. Won?t bother them on Sunday. The symptom this time is different than last. Last time was amp acting like tuner not tuned. This time showing excessive input power even though actual power is fine. Let?s see what happens. Dave wo2x Sent from my waxed string and tin cans. > On Apr 27, 2019, at 7:17 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: > > Dave, > > Time to contact support at elecraft.com. > Unfortunately, they are only open for the next 45 minutes (unless someone is working late), so be patient while the support folks enjoy their weekend. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > >> On 4/27/2019 6:48 PM, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: >> The input too high only happens into a non-resonant load (tuner in circuit). >> Also noticed on 20 now when tuner is in operate there is a 3 dB drop in >> noise floor. >> This is the second time the 3 watt resistor has desoldered itself from the >> board and both times the resistor is discolored. >> Only one RF path from radios through switching into amp input. Amp output >> feeds a 1x4 antenna switch. No other radios transmitting in near proximity. >> Definitely something failed on filter board. >> Dave wo2x >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Paul Baldock >> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 6:21 PM >> To: rocketnj at gmail.com; elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high >> Try it in to a dummy load. >> - Paul >> At 02:48 PM 4/27/2019, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> >>> >>> KPA-1500 s/n 423 >>> >>> >>> >>> Operating 80 meter SSB running 20 watts drive with tuner engaged for >>> about >>> 1240 watts out PEP. Remote app shows maximum power handling of 1620 watts. >>> >>> Out of nowhere I got an input power too high alarm @ 191 watts! The >>> radio is capable of 100 watts out max and verified is set to 20 watts. >>> >>> >>> >>> Set tune power to 10 watts. >>> >>> Meter in amp during standby reads 10 watts. >>> >>> Switch to operate and immediately get input power too high alarm @ 91 >> watts. >>> >>> >>> >>> Switch to 20 meters (resonant antenna). No issue - 10 watts tune is >>> approximately 400 watts out with no error. >>> >>> >>> >>> Any ideas? >>> >>> >>> >>> Dave wo2x >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email >>> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jackbrindle at me.com Sat Apr 27 20:28:40 2019 From: jackbrindle at me.com (Jack Brindle) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:28:40 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high In-Reply-To: References: <00f601d4fd43$05b26300$11172900$@gmail.com> <5cc4d5e7.1c69fb81.8e23c.4020@mx.google.com> <014701d4fd4b$59098e40$0b1caac0$@gmail.com> Message-ID: <669C64BD-BEEE-41C1-9BD7-702AE2760479@me.com> They are going to want to know what is going on with the input power. The burned resistor (twice!) is a very good indication that there is indeed too much power flowing into the KPA?s front end at times. It is quite possible for any transmitter to put out more power than spec at times, especially if it is not properly calibrated. There are many rigs that as-designed have a bad tendency to overshoot drastically on key-down, then settle to the power they are supposed to be putting out. An analog wattmeter will not be fast enough to show the problem, but the amplifier?s input definitely sees it. You need to get them to fix the KPA?s input circuit, but you should also investigate your transceiver to find out why it is overshooting at times. Perhaps it is in need of a fresh calibration or something else might be going on. 73! Jack, W6FB > On Apr 27, 2019, at 4:20 PM, Dave wrote: > > I can wait until tomorrow. Won?t bother them on Sunday. > > The symptom this time is different than last. Last time was amp acting like tuner not tuned. This time showing excessive input power even though actual power is fine. > > Let?s see what happens. > > Dave wo2x > > Sent from my waxed string and tin cans. > >> On Apr 27, 2019, at 7:17 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: >> >> Dave, >> >> Time to contact support at elecraft.com. >> Unfortunately, they are only open for the next 45 minutes (unless someone is working late), so be patient while the support folks enjoy their weekend. >> >> 73, >> Don W3FPR >> >>> On 4/27/2019 6:48 PM, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: >>> The input too high only happens into a non-resonant load (tuner in circuit). >>> Also noticed on 20 now when tuner is in operate there is a 3 dB drop in >>> noise floor. >>> This is the second time the 3 watt resistor has desoldered itself from the >>> board and both times the resistor is discolored. >>> Only one RF path from radios through switching into amp input. Amp output >>> feeds a 1x4 antenna switch. No other radios transmitting in near proximity. >>> Definitely something failed on filter board. >>> Dave wo2x >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Paul Baldock >>> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 6:21 PM >>> To: rocketnj at gmail.com; elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high >>> Try it in to a dummy load. >>> - Paul >>> At 02:48 PM 4/27/2019, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> KPA-1500 s/n 423 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Operating 80 meter SSB running 20 watts drive with tuner engaged for >>>> about >>>> 1240 watts out PEP. Remote app shows maximum power handling of 1620 watts. >>>> >>>> Out of nowhere I got an input power too high alarm @ 191 watts! The >>>> radio is capable of 100 watts out max and verified is set to 20 watts. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Set tune power to 10 watts. >>>> >>>> Meter in amp during standby reads 10 watts. >>>> >>>> Switch to operate and immediately get input power too high alarm @ 91 >>> watts. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Switch to 20 meters (resonant antenna). No issue - 10 watts tune is >>>> approximately 400 watts out with no error. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Any ideas? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Dave wo2x >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>> >>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email >>>> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rocketnj at gmail.com Sat Apr 27 20:48:10 2019 From: rocketnj at gmail.com (Dave) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:48:10 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high In-Reply-To: <669C64BD-BEEE-41C1-9BD7-702AE2760479@me.com> References: <00f601d4fd43$05b26300$11172900$@gmail.com> <5cc4d5e7.1c69fb81.8e23c.4020@mx.google.com> <014701d4fd4b$59098e40$0b1caac0$@gmail.com> <669C64BD-BEEE-41C1-9BD7-702AE2760479@me.com> Message-ID: Hi Jack, No indication suggests the radio is putting out excessive power. To prove the point I used two different radios (Flex 6600 and Anan 7000dle. Anan has PA power calibrated.) Flex Power Genius XL has lightning fast protection and never shows spikes. Array Solutions Power Master II does not show spikes. It is NOT a spike issue but rather the amp thinks input power is excessive. It thinks 10 watts is 79 and 21 watts is 191. Something is amiss when using the amp on 80 meters with tuner in circuit. Remote app says max power of 1620 but I run about 1250 max. All other bands are resonant. Another symptom is when going from standby to operate the noise floor drops 3 dB on bands where the tuner is bypassed. The 3 watt resistor was added after initial design of Rev C filter board. It is in the circuit that feeds RF to the on board frequency counter. This is on the input side of the filter board. Maximum power I run on any band is 35 watts. I am sure when the log file is reviewed it will show it is not spikes. Dave wo2x Sent from my iPad > On Apr 27, 2019, at 8:28 PM, Jack Brindle wrote: > > They are going to want to know what is going on with the input power. The burned resistor (twice!) is a very good indication that there is indeed too much power flowing into the KPA?s front end at times. It is quite possible for any transmitter to put out more power than spec at times, especially if it is not properly calibrated. > There are many rigs that as-designed have a bad tendency to overshoot drastically on key-down, then settle to the power they are supposed to be putting out. An analog wattmeter will not be fast enough to show the problem, but the amplifier?s input definitely sees it. > > You need to get them to fix the KPA?s input circuit, but you should also investigate your transceiver to find out why it is overshooting at times. Perhaps it is in need of a fresh calibration or something else might be going on. > > 73! > Jack, W6FB > > > >> On Apr 27, 2019, at 4:20 PM, Dave wrote: >> >> I can wait until tomorrow. Won?t bother them on Sunday. >> >> The symptom this time is different than last. Last time was amp acting like tuner not tuned. This time showing excessive input power even though actual power is fine. >> >> Let?s see what happens. >> >> Dave wo2x >> >> Sent from my waxed string and tin cans. >> >>> On Apr 27, 2019, at 7:17 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: >>> >>> Dave, >>> >>> Time to contact support at elecraft.com. >>> Unfortunately, they are only open for the next 45 minutes (unless someone is working late), so be patient while the support folks enjoy their weekend. >>> >>> 73, >>> Don W3FPR >>> >>>> On 4/27/2019 6:48 PM, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: >>>> The input too high only happens into a non-resonant load (tuner in circuit). >>>> Also noticed on 20 now when tuner is in operate there is a 3 dB drop in >>>> noise floor. >>>> This is the second time the 3 watt resistor has desoldered itself from the >>>> board and both times the resistor is discolored. >>>> Only one RF path from radios through switching into amp input. Amp output >>>> feeds a 1x4 antenna switch. No other radios transmitting in near proximity. >>>> Definitely something failed on filter board. >>>> Dave wo2x >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Paul Baldock >>>> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 6:21 PM >>>> To: rocketnj at gmail.com; elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high >>>> Try it in to a dummy load. >>>> - Paul >>>> At 02:48 PM 4/27/2019, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> KPA-1500 s/n 423 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Operating 80 meter SSB running 20 watts drive with tuner engaged for >>>>> about >>>>> 1240 watts out PEP. Remote app shows maximum power handling of 1620 watts. >>>>> >>>>> Out of nowhere I got an input power too high alarm @ 191 watts! The >>>>> radio is capable of 100 watts out max and verified is set to 20 watts. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Set tune power to 10 watts. >>>>> >>>>> Meter in amp during standby reads 10 watts. >>>>> >>>>> Switch to operate and immediately get input power too high alarm @ 91 >>>> watts. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Switch to 20 meters (resonant antenna). No issue - 10 watts tune is >>>>> approximately 400 watts out with no error. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Any ideas? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Dave wo2x >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>>> >>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email >>>>> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From n6kr at elecraft.com Sat Apr 27 20:53:07 2019 From: n6kr at elecraft.com (Wayne Burdick) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 17:53:07 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] New KX2/KX3 firmware improves ATU tuning with low battery voltages Message-ID: We have a new field test revision of KX2 / KX3 firmware ready that provides much more accurate ATU tuning when the transceiver is operated from low power supply / solar panel / battery voltages. For example, if you're using 8 NiMH or alkaline batteries, ATU tunes should now be reliable down to as low as 1.1 volts per cell (8.8 V as indicated by the rig's supply voltage display). On our lab radios we get good tunes with most loads even at 1 volt per cell (8.0 V). Results will vary somewhat due to component tolerances. If you'd like to help us evaluate this new firmware, please email me directly. I'll send copies out to the first few dozen respondents. I'm sure we'll be doing a beta release next week. Everyone will then have access to it. 73, Wayne N6KR From kevinr at coho.net Sat Apr 27 23:33:35 2019 From: kevinr at coho.net (kevinr) Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:33:35 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Announcement Message-ID: Good Evening, The last of the neotenous flowers are blooming before the alder close the canopy.? Hummingbirds have ceased gathering cobwebs from around my windows.? Bracken fern are growing rapidly; not yet unrolling but over a foot tall.? Yesterday they were only lumps pushing out of the soil.? Spring is well underway.? The currently spotless sun is tossing ions in our direction.? A stream of solar wind is due on May 2nd.? Maybe we can make a few contacts using the original digital mode :) Please join us on: 14050 kHz at 2200z Sunday (3 PM PDT Sunday) ?7047 kHz at 0000z Monday (5 PM PDT Sunday) 73, Kevin. KD5ONS _ From nr4c at widomaker.com Sun Apr 28 00:45:27 2019 From: nr4c at widomaker.com (Nr4c) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 00:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - DVR installation question In-Reply-To: References: <4427db0b-5ea7-553d-04e8-47847a3e858e@nycap.rr.com> Message-ID: Did you build your K3? If so, it?s no big deal. You do have to remove the from panel but it?s easy and trust me. The first time you installed the panel it was tricky. But after that it?s not hard at all. FYI: I bought a 10 Watt/ no ATU kit in August or 2009. I went into the thing every weekend till I had all the additions installed. Thought several times about putting a zipper on the top cover! Don?t fret the disassembly/reassembly. Sent from my iPhone ...nr4c. bill > On Apr 26, 2019, at 6:11 PM, Bill Johnson wrote: > > I rarely use my DVR as I don't contest. When I have a mic or audio xmit issue, it is super handy. Just sayin'. > > 72 & 73, > Bill > K9YEQ > FT?er for K2, KX1, KX3, KXPA100, KAT500, W2, etc. > > -----Original Message----- > From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Bill > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 9:15 AM > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - DVR installation question > > Grant: thanks for the link to the install manual. WOW! I don't see that in my future - too many places for errors. My K3 is not broken and I don't want to break it. Thanks again. > > Of course, I could always sent the K3 out and have all the updates made and the DVR installed. But, all I operate on is 75 meters these days and really see no need for the updates. Again, the K3 is working wonderful. > > Bill W2BLC > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From g7ltq at newgas.net Sun Apr 28 06:40:50 2019 From: g7ltq at newgas.net (John Newgas) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 11:40:50 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Programming Passband and Passband offset ? Message-ID: My KX3 is often operated remotely via a Raspberry Pi and VNC - mainly for digital working with JS8Call and WSJT-X. I?ve set up a set of programmed instructions that I run before each session to make sure that everything is set up correctly such as Data Mode A, Power Output, Microphone and Audio Settings. I can see how to set the Bandwidth (Passband Tuning ) using the BW Command but I want to have a defined bandwidth of 500 to 2500 Hz, Is the right way to use BW 20 ; IS 1500 ; ? Or is there a better way to adjust the PassBand offset ? John G7LTQ From brian.waterworth at gmail.com Sun Apr 28 11:43:53 2019 From: brian.waterworth at gmail.com (Brian Waterworth) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 11:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Programming Passband and Passband offset ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi John, Would you elaborate as to why you want to have 500-2500hz as your audio passband width? I have my KX3 BW = 4.00 and run split mode with JS8Call and WSJT-X. That keeps my signal in the sweet spot and gives me a view to other signals up past 2500Hz in case I want to try to work them. regards, Brian VE3IBW On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 6:41 AM John Newgas wrote: > My KX3 is often operated remotely via a Raspberry Pi and VNC - mainly for > digital working with JS8Call and WSJT-X. > I?ve set up a set of programmed instructions that I run before each > session to make sure that everything is set up correctly such as Data Mode > A, Power Output, Microphone and Audio Settings. > > I can see how to set the Bandwidth (Passband Tuning ) using the BW Command > but I want to have a defined bandwidth of 500 to 2500 Hz, Is the right > way to use > BW 20 ; IS 1500 ; ? Or is there a better way to adjust the PassBand > offset ? > > John G7LTQ > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From oz7bq at yahoo.dk Sun Apr 28 11:47:17 2019 From: oz7bq at yahoo.dk (Hans J Rasmusen OZ7BQ) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 15:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 VFO B knob software upgrade wish References: <1825657390.2236897.1556466437203.ref@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1825657390.2236897.1556466437203@mail.yahoo.com> When the next KX3 software update is planned, will you please consider the following items: 1) The VFO B knob is in the B position at start up. When tapping RIT ( or XIT) the VFO B knob switch to OFS, as it should. However? the VFO B knob remains in the OFS position when tapping RIT again to switch RIT off. Rotating the VFO B knob does not seem to have any effect.The VFO B knob should return to the B position, when RIT is switched off. This would be easier than tapping the VFO B knob. Also you may notice that if the KX3 is switched off while the RIT is on, then the RIT icon will be on but inactive, when the KX3 next time is switched on, because the VFO B knob correctly is in the B position. 2) AF/RF and Keyer/Mic can be adjusted while transmitting. The PBT I/II for some reason can not. My logging program can do it, but it would be more convenient to be able do it manually while transmitting. Minor items maybe, but useful. 73 and thanksOZ7BQ Hans J?rgen (Joe) From g7ltq at newgas.net Sun Apr 28 11:58:17 2019 From: g7ltq at newgas.net (John Newgas) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 16:58:17 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Programming Passband and Passband offset ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <629ECAED-DEFE-44D3-80A0-3A5CB07AA6EF@newgas.net> Bottom end of the audio passband at 500 because all heartbeats etc. should normally be in 500-1000Hz range. As to bandwidth, I am in a very noisy City environment in London. My antenna is a 12m end fed wire tied to the top of a wooden fence - and half of that length is shielded as it is between two houses. A narrow bandwidth simply keeps the noise levels down, but will still capture virtually all the JS8Call traffic. 80m is unusable unless I can narrow the passband right down. John G7LTQ > On 28 Apr 2019, at 16:43, Brian Waterworth wrote: > > Hi John, > > Would you elaborate as to why you want to have 500-2500hz as your audio passband width? I have my KX3 BW = 4.00 and run split mode with JS8Call and WSJT-X. That keeps my signal in the sweet spot and gives me a view to other signals up past 2500Hz in case I want to try to work them. > > regards, > Brian > VE3IBW > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 6:41 AM John Newgas > wrote: > My KX3 is often operated remotely via a Raspberry Pi and VNC - mainly for digital working with JS8Call and WSJT-X. > I?ve set up a set of programmed instructions that I run before each session to make sure that everything is set up correctly such as Data Mode A, Power Output, Microphone and Audio Settings. > > I can see how to set the Bandwidth (Passband Tuning ) using the BW Command but I want to have a defined bandwidth of 500 to 2500 Hz, Is the right way to use > BW 20 ; IS 1500 ; ? Or is there a better way to adjust the PassBand offset ? > > John G7LTQ > From k4xu.1268 at gmail.com Sun Apr 28 12:23:29 2019 From: k4xu.1268 at gmail.com (Dick Frey) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 09:23:29 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] No VOX Message-ID: Rear panel mic input, electret mic. Mic+Lin on. VOM shows 8V across mic element. Tried several mics. VOX works on CW, not on SSB. What am I missing? It used to work. No biggie, I'm a CW guy but FD is coming up. -- Dick - K4XU From k6dgw at foothill.net Sun Apr 28 12:36:59 2019 From: k6dgw at foothill.net (Fred Jensen) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 09:36:59 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S Audio buzz on transmit, especially AM In-Reply-To: <789d4ef9-595a-644b-262e-65c16eb7c9d7@gmail.com> References: <1878340975.10530149.1556343843951.JavaMail.root@starpower.net> <789d4ef9-595a-644b-262e-65c16eb7c9d7@gmail.com> Message-ID: <18d11bb3-f92c-7721-6adf-72c383b8be1f@foothill.net> Ahh indeed.? Several hours at W7RN with a new router trying random things was less than productive.? A more structured, several step effort at home yielded the solution, which was primarily router pilot error. 73, Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW Sparks NV DM09dn Washoe County On 4/27/2019 1:02 PM, Rick WA6NHC wrote: > What they are saying is that it is best to break things down into > logical clear steps, isolating as much as possible to prove or > eliminate cause and effect.? The issue are that some folks don't know > enough to do this and some have issues trying to be logical; running > in circles while others often seek the easy way(s) out. No slur is > meant or intended, people have different abilities or we wouldn't need > groups like this. > > This is all best done while the XYL is at the spa or otherwise > unavailable for a few hours.? ;-) > From tom.campie at gmail.com Sun Apr 28 13:02:42 2019 From: tom.campie at gmail.com (TJ Campie) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 19:02:42 +0200 Subject: [Elecraft] New bug, popping on dah side Message-ID: I hooked up a new bug (begali intrepid) and am noticing popping when keying dahs - I if I add a 4.7uF bypass across the key line it clears this up but it?ll sometimes make it so there?s no dits. I can?t figure this one out - is there something I need to do to make sure there?s no extra garbage when I?m keying? (Contacts are clean) Thanks. -- TJ Campie Sent with Airmail From Hamshack at N4ST.com Sun Apr 28 13:10:37 2019 From: Hamshack at N4ST.com (Jim - N4ST) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 13:10:37 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] New bug, popping on dah side In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <000601d4fde5$51905aa0$f4b10fe0$@N4ST.com> TJ, No callsign? What rig are you using? Are you hearing the popping sound in the sidetone? Definitely don't put a cap across the contacts. You may need to diddle with your QSK settings. Other users may be able to help you more if they know which rig. _____________ 73, Jim - N4ST -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of TJ Campie Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2019 13:03 To: Elecraft Subject: [Elecraft] New bug, popping on dah side I hooked up a new bug (begali intrepid) and am noticing popping when keying dahs - I if I add a 4.7uF bypass across the key line it clears this up but it?ll sometimes make it so there?s no dits. I can?t figure this one out - is there something I need to do to make sure there?s no extra garbage when I?m keying? (Contacts are clean) Thanks. -- TJ Campie Sent with Airmail From john at kn5l.net Sun Apr 28 13:11:16 2019 From: john at kn5l.net (John Oppenheimer) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 12:11:16 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] New bug, popping on dah side In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <22f4c000-f505-437e-4344-51d4ea6169b6@kn5l.net> Nice!! A Begali Intrepid, All bugs will have contact bounce. K3 does not handle them well at all, same for KX3/2. K2 is much more tolerant. Though normally for the dot side. I fixed it with a home-brew debouncer: https://www.kn5l.net/debounce555/ Others cam be found on the WWW. It was fun designing and building one. John KN5L On 4/28/19 12:02 PM, TJ Campie wrote: > I hooked up a new bug (begali intrepid) and am noticing popping when keying > dahs - I if I add a 4.7uF bypass across the key line it clears this up but > it???ll sometimes make it so there???s no dits. I can???t figure this one out - > is there something I need to do to make sure there???s no extra garbage when > I???m keying? (Contacts are clean) From john at kn5l.net Sun Apr 28 13:32:42 2019 From: john at kn5l.net (John Oppenheimer) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 12:32:42 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] New bug, popping on dah side In-Reply-To: <22f4c000-f505-437e-4344-51d4ea6169b6@kn5l.net> References: <22f4c000-f505-437e-4344-51d4ea6169b6@kn5l.net> Message-ID: TJ, your six miles line of sight, what to come by and borrow it for a while to see if it's a fix? John KN5L On 4/28/19 12:11 PM, John Oppenheimer wrote: > Nice!! A Begali Intrepid, > > All bugs will have contact bounce. K3 does not handle them well at all, > same for KX3/2. K2 is much more tolerant. Though normally for the dot side. > > I fixed it with a home-brew debouncer: > https://www.kn5l.net/debounce555/ > > Others cam be found on the WWW. It was fun designing and building one. > > John KN5L > > On 4/28/19 12:02 PM, TJ Campie wrote: >> I hooked up a new bug (begali intrepid) and am noticing popping when keying >> dahs - I if I add a 4.7uF bypass across the key line it clears this up but >> it???ll sometimes make it so there???s no dits. I can???t figure this one out - >> is there something I need to do to make sure there???s no extra garbage when >> I???m keying? (Contacts are clean) From brian.waterworth at gmail.com Sun Apr 28 13:47:35 2019 From: brian.waterworth at gmail.com (Brian Waterworth) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 13:47:35 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KX3 Programming Passband and Passband offset ? In-Reply-To: <629ECAED-DEFE-44D3-80A0-3A5CB07AA6EF@newgas.net> References: <629ECAED-DEFE-44D3-80A0-3A5CB07AA6EF@newgas.net> Message-ID: Thank you for the additional details. The commands you wrote about in this thread should give you what you want. Have you had a chance to try them out yet to confirm? I haven't tried myself, just read the programmer's ref guide (E19) and drew it out on a piece of paper so I could see the bandwidths and how they shift. I always struggle with which way to shift. Even wsjtx split mode gets me second guessing the direction of the shift. Luckily the app knows what to do :-). Is your motivation for reducing the noise above 2.5Khz due to unwanted AGC action from these strong signals? We can take this part of the conversation off-list if you'd like. regards, Brian VE3IBW On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 11:58 AM John Newgas wrote: > Bottom end of the audio passband at 500 because all heartbeats etc. should > normally be in 500-1000Hz range. As to bandwidth, I am in a very noisy > City environment in London. My antenna is a 12m end fed wire tied to the > top of a wooden fence - and half of that length is shielded as it is > between two houses. > > A narrow bandwidth simply keeps the noise levels down, but will still > capture virtually all the JS8Call traffic. 80m is unusable unless I can > narrow the passband right down. > > John G7LTQ > > > On 28 Apr 2019, at 16:43, Brian Waterworth > wrote: > > > > Hi John, > > > > Would you elaborate as to why you want to have 500-2500hz as your audio > passband width? I have my KX3 BW = 4.00 and run split mode with JS8Call > and WSJT-X. That keeps my signal in the sweet spot and gives me a view to > other signals up past 2500Hz in case I want to try to work them. > > > > regards, > > Brian > > VE3IBW > > > > On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 6:41 AM John Newgas g7ltq at newgas.net>> wrote: > > My KX3 is often operated remotely via a Raspberry Pi and VNC - mainly > for digital working with JS8Call and WSJT-X. > > I?ve set up a set of programmed instructions that I run before each > session to make sure that everything is set up correctly such as Data Mode > A, Power Output, Microphone and Audio Settings. > > > > I can see how to set the Bandwidth (Passband Tuning ) using the BW > Command but I want to have a defined bandwidth of 500 to 2500 Hz, Is the > right way to use > > BW 20 ; IS 1500 ; ? Or is there a better way to adjust the PassBand > offset ? > > > > John G7LTQ > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From k2vco.vic at gmail.com Sun Apr 28 14:15:24 2019 From: k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 21:15:24 +0300 Subject: [Elecraft] New bug, popping on dah side In-Reply-To: <22f4c000-f505-437e-4344-51d4ea6169b6@kn5l.net> References: <22f4c000-f505-437e-4344-51d4ea6169b6@kn5l.net> Message-ID: I have tried all kinds of debouncing circuits, but the one that has always worked best is simply a 12v reed relay with a 10uf capacitor across its coil -- not across the contacts! I used an SPST reed relay I got at the now-defunct Radio Shack, but there are many such relays that are suitable. Reed relays are fast enough to follow the contact bounce of the bug, hence the 10uf across the coil. This works fine with a 9v battery or from your usual 12v station PS. 73, Victor, 4X6GP Rehovot, Israel Formerly K2VCO CWops no. 5 http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ On 28/04/2019 20:11, John Oppenheimer wrote: > Nice!! A Begali Intrepid, > > All bugs will have contact bounce. K3 does not handle them well at all, > same for KX3/2. K2 is much more tolerant. Though normally for the dot side. > > I fixed it with a home-brew debouncer: > https://www.kn5l.net/debounce555/ > > Others cam be found on the WWW. It was fun designing and building one. > > John KN5L > > On 4/28/19 12:02 PM, TJ Campie wrote: >> I hooked up a new bug (begali intrepid) and am noticing popping when keying >> dahs - I if I add a 4.7uF bypass across the key line it clears this up but >> it???ll sometimes make it so there???s no dits. I can???t figure this one out - >> is there something I need to do to make sure there???s no extra garbage when >> I???m keying? (Contacts are clean) > From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Sun Apr 28 14:55:34 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 11:55:34 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] No VOX In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: So bias is obviously turned on. I'm guessing VOX Gain, Mic Gain. Try putting the K3 into TX mode with the front panel button, talk, and set mic gain to get RF out, then stop TX and set VOX Gain (short push of Menu). For max talk power, set TXEQ with the first three bands max cut, about 6 dB cut of the 4th band, a few dB boost of the top two bands. 73, Jim K9YC On 4/28/2019 9:23 AM, Dick Frey wrote: > Rear panel mic input, electret mic. Mic+Lin on. VOM shows 8V across mic > element. Tried several mics. > VOX works on CW, not on SSB. What am I missing? It used to work. > No biggie, I'm a CW guy but FD is coming up. From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Sun Apr 28 15:06:32 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 12:06:32 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] No VOX In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <98046a0c-7fd8-8c79-5984-5db233d6a9ba@audiosystemsgroup.com> Another thought, Dick. We need to set Line In gain and Mic Gain separately. To do that, we must be set for Line In to set Line In gain. Check the manual -- I don't recall if the knob is adjusting Mic Gain in the Mic + Line position or if we must change to Mic In to set it. 73, Jim On 4/28/2019 11:55 AM, Jim Brown wrote: > So bias is obviously turned on. I'm guessing VOX Gain, Mic Gain. > From jackbrindle at me.com Sun Apr 28 16:22:44 2019 From: jackbrindle at me.com (Jack Brindle) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 13:22:44 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high In-Reply-To: References: <00f601d4fd43$05b26300$11172900$@gmail.com> <5cc4d5e7.1c69fb81.8e23c.4020@mx.google.com> <014701d4fd4b$59098e40$0b1caac0$@gmail.com> <669C64BD-BEEE-41C1-9BD7-702AE2760479@me.com> Message-ID: <4628F516-F337-44DE-828C-DC6A8BF1B124@me.com> Components fail for a reason, which almost always is because they have been over-stressed. Component manufacturers spend a lot of time analyzing their devices to determine their stress points, failure modes and safe usage areas. When we design equipment, we look at this information to make sure the component will perform exactly the way we need it to perform for the lifetime of the design, and that we do not stress the component so as to make sure that it remains in the safe zone. This is done for each and every component in the design. In some cases, such as high availability systems (think telephone switches and other mission-critical devices) the work is required by the customer in contracts, in others it is done to reduce the failure opportunities and thus the need for repairs. The arena of six-sigma design was created to directly address component design and reduce opportunities for failure. When approaching a failure of this sort, you have to ask why the component failed. It didn?t fail on its own, there was some stress that caused it to fail. Resistor stresses are very well known. When they fail with an over-heating indication (burn marks, etc), then the over-stress has to be questioned. You can bet that it comes from having too much drive into the equipment. At that point, you then need to ask where that drive came from, then start looking at everything in the overall system for the reason. You will most likely be surprised where it comes from. The fact that this has happened twice is an excellent indicator that it is somewhere in the system that has yet to be properly investigated. I would encourage you to better look into the components to find out just what is going on. To put it another way, I have reviewed enough KPA500 log files for this scenario to have an excellent feel for where these problems arise. It is never the amplifier. Good luck with your station. I hope you find the issue without too much difficulty. 73, Jack, W6FB > On Apr 27, 2019, at 5:48 PM, Dave wrote: > > Hi Jack, > > No indication suggests the radio is putting out excessive power. To prove the point I used two different radios (Flex 6600 and Anan 7000dle. Anan has PA power calibrated.) > > Flex Power Genius XL has lightning fast protection and never shows spikes. Array Solutions Power Master II does not show spikes. It is NOT a spike issue but rather the amp thinks input power is excessive. It thinks 10 watts is 79 and 21 watts is 191. > > Something is amiss when using the amp on 80 meters with tuner in circuit. Remote app says max power of 1620 but I run about 1250 max. All other bands are resonant. > > Another symptom is when going from standby to operate the noise floor drops 3 dB on bands where the tuner is bypassed. > > The 3 watt resistor was added after initial design of Rev C filter board. It is in the circuit that feeds RF to the on board frequency counter. This is on the input side of the filter board. Maximum power I run on any band is 35 watts. > > I am sure when the log file is reviewed it will show it is not spikes. > > Dave wo2x > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Apr 27, 2019, at 8:28 PM, Jack Brindle wrote: >> >> They are going to want to know what is going on with the input power. The burned resistor (twice!) is a very good indication that there is indeed too much power flowing into the KPA?s front end at times. It is quite possible for any transmitter to put out more power than spec at times, especially if it is not properly calibrated. >> There are many rigs that as-designed have a bad tendency to overshoot drastically on key-down, then settle to the power they are supposed to be putting out. An analog wattmeter will not be fast enough to show the problem, but the amplifier?s input definitely sees it. >> >> You need to get them to fix the KPA?s input circuit, but you should also investigate your transceiver to find out why it is overshooting at times. Perhaps it is in need of a fresh calibration or something else might be going on. >> >> 73! >> Jack, W6FB >> >> >> >>> On Apr 27, 2019, at 4:20 PM, Dave wrote: >>> >>> I can wait until tomorrow. Won?t bother them on Sunday. >>> >>> The symptom this time is different than last. Last time was amp acting like tuner not tuned. This time showing excessive input power even though actual power is fine. >>> >>> Let?s see what happens. >>> >>> Dave wo2x >>> >>> Sent from my waxed string and tin cans. >>> >>>> On Apr 27, 2019, at 7:17 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: >>>> >>>> Dave, >>>> >>>> Time to contact support at elecraft.com. >>>> Unfortunately, they are only open for the next 45 minutes (unless someone is working late), so be patient while the support folks enjoy their weekend. >>>> >>>> 73, >>>> Don W3FPR >>>> >>>>> On 4/27/2019 6:48 PM, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: >>>>> The input too high only happens into a non-resonant load (tuner in circuit). >>>>> Also noticed on 20 now when tuner is in operate there is a 3 dB drop in >>>>> noise floor. >>>>> This is the second time the 3 watt resistor has desoldered itself from the >>>>> board and both times the resistor is discolored. >>>>> Only one RF path from radios through switching into amp input. Amp output >>>>> feeds a 1x4 antenna switch. No other radios transmitting in near proximity. >>>>> Definitely something failed on filter board. >>>>> Dave wo2x >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Paul Baldock >>>>> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 6:21 PM >>>>> To: rocketnj at gmail.com; elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high >>>>> Try it in to a dummy load. >>>>> - Paul >>>>> At 02:48 PM 4/27/2019, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> KPA-1500 s/n 423 >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Operating 80 meter SSB running 20 watts drive with tuner engaged for >>>>>> about >>>>>> 1240 watts out PEP. Remote app shows maximum power handling of 1620 watts. >>>>>> >>>>>> Out of nowhere I got an input power too high alarm @ 191 watts! The >>>>>> radio is capable of 100 watts out max and verified is set to 20 watts. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Set tune power to 10 watts. >>>>>> >>>>>> Meter in amp during standby reads 10 watts. >>>>>> >>>>>> Switch to operate and immediately get input power too high alarm @ 91 >>>>> watts. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Switch to 20 meters (resonant antenna). No issue - 10 watts tune is >>>>>> approximately 400 watts out with no error. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Any ideas? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Dave wo2x >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>>>> >>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email >>>>>> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> From rocketnj at gmail.com Sun Apr 28 16:55:24 2019 From: rocketnj at gmail.com (Dave) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 16:55:24 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high In-Reply-To: <4628F516-F337-44DE-828C-DC6A8BF1B124@me.com> References: <00f601d4fd43$05b26300$11172900$@gmail.com> <5cc4d5e7.1c69fb81.8e23c.4020@mx.google.com> <014701d4fd4b$59098e40$0b1caac0$@gmail.com> <669C64BD-BEEE-41C1-9BD7-702AE2760479@me.com> <4628F516-F337-44DE-828C-DC6A8BF1B124@me.com> Message-ID: <9D50E950-8237-48FD-ABE9-BA30845349CC@gmail.com> I agree the root cause needs to be identified but my point is in standby power always reads correct. In operate on 80 with tuner in circuit everything is ok also until the failure. Once something failed the amp is now reporting incorrectly that there is excessive input power. Wheter output power somehow is being coupled back into the input detection circuit or a failure of the circuit misreporting input power is still to be determined. I find it near impossible that a Flex 6600 can have a forward spike of 191 watts when output set to 22 watts and go undetected since the radio is new. I also find a totally different radio also shows forward power alarm of 188 watts when also set to 22 watts. This is clearly a failure of the amplifier causing it to misreport input power when in operate. There is also the issue of excessive power flowing through th3 3k Ohm 3 watt resistor that feeds the onboard frequency counter. Not sure why this is happening as I do not overdrive the amp and log files back that up. I think that the reactance of my 80 meter antenna (optimized G5RV) may be too much for the amp & tuner. The remote app sjows max power of 1620 watts and I run 1250 PEP. Maybe I should dump the KPA1500 and stick with the Power Genius XL, which by the way is working perfectly with an HF Auto in place of the KPA1500. No power spikes seen on the amp, tuner, or Power Master II. I do appreciate you suggesting to check everything (radio, antenna, etc). Makes sense but this is a straight up amp failure. Now to determine what conditions caused the failure. P.S. - I kmow about Six Sigma, having worked 17 years for Motorola. Dave wo2x Sent from my iPad > On Apr 28, 2019, at 4:22 PM, Jack Brindle wrote: > > Components fail for a reason, which almost always is because they have been over-stressed. Component manufacturers spend a lot of time analyzing their devices to determine their stress points, failure modes and safe usage areas. When we design equipment, we look at this information to make sure the component will perform exactly the way we need it to perform for the lifetime of the design, and that we do not stress the component so as to make sure that it remains in the safe zone. This is done for each and every component in the design. In some cases, such as high availability systems (think telephone switches and other mission-critical devices) the work is required by the customer in contracts, in others it is done to reduce the failure opportunities and thus the need for repairs. The arena of six-sigma design was created to directly address component design and reduce opportunities for failure. > > When approaching a failure of this sort, you have to ask why the component failed. It didn?t fail on its own, there was some stress that caused it to fail. Resistor stresses are very well known. When they fail with an over-heating indication (burn marks, etc), then the over-stress has to be questioned. You can bet that it comes from having too much drive into the equipment. At that point, you then need to ask where that drive came from, then start looking at everything in the overall system for the reason. You will most likely be surprised where it comes from. The fact that this has happened twice is an excellent indicator that it is somewhere in the system that has yet to be properly investigated. I would encourage you to better look into the components to find out just what is going on. To put it another way, I have reviewed enough KPA500 log files for this scenario to have an excellent feel for where these problems arise. It is never the amplifier. > > Good luck with your station. I hope you find the issue without too much difficulty. > > 73, > Jack, W6FB > >> On Apr 27, 2019, at 5:48 PM, Dave wrote: >> >> Hi Jack, >> >> No indication suggests the radio is putting out excessive power. To prove the point I used two different radios (Flex 6600 and Anan 7000dle. Anan has PA power calibrated.) >> >> Flex Power Genius XL has lightning fast protection and never shows spikes. Array Solutions Power Master II does not show spikes. It is NOT a spike issue but rather the amp thinks input power is excessive. It thinks 10 watts is 79 and 21 watts is 191. >> >> Something is amiss when using the amp on 80 meters with tuner in circuit. Remote app says max power of 1620 but I run about 1250 max. All other bands are resonant. >> >> Another symptom is when going from standby to operate the noise floor drops 3 dB on bands where the tuner is bypassed. >> >> The 3 watt resistor was added after initial design of Rev C filter board. It is in the circuit that feeds RF to the on board frequency counter. This is on the input side of the filter board. Maximum power I run on any band is 35 watts. >> >> I am sure when the log file is reviewed it will show it is not spikes. >> >> Dave wo2x >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On Apr 27, 2019, at 8:28 PM, Jack Brindle wrote: >>> >>> They are going to want to know what is going on with the input power. The burned resistor (twice!) is a very good indication that there is indeed too much power flowing into the KPA?s front end at times. It is quite possible for any transmitter to put out more power than spec at times, especially if it is not properly calibrated. >>> There are many rigs that as-designed have a bad tendency to overshoot drastically on key-down, then settle to the power they are supposed to be putting out. An analog wattmeter will not be fast enough to show the problem, but the amplifier?s input definitely sees it. >>> >>> You need to get them to fix the KPA?s input circuit, but you should also investigate your transceiver to find out why it is overshooting at times. Perhaps it is in need of a fresh calibration or something else might be going on. >>> >>> 73! >>> Jack, W6FB >>> >>> >>> >>>> On Apr 27, 2019, at 4:20 PM, Dave wrote: >>>> >>>> I can wait until tomorrow. Won?t bother them on Sunday. >>>> >>>> The symptom this time is different than last. Last time was amp acting like tuner not tuned. This time showing excessive input power even though actual power is fine. >>>> >>>> Let?s see what happens. >>>> >>>> Dave wo2x >>>> >>>> Sent from my waxed string and tin cans. >>>> >>>>> On Apr 27, 2019, at 7:17 PM, Don Wilhelm wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dave, >>>>> >>>>> Time to contact support at elecraft.com. >>>>> Unfortunately, they are only open for the next 45 minutes (unless someone is working late), so be patient while the support folks enjoy their weekend. >>>>> >>>>> 73, >>>>> Don W3FPR >>>>> >>>>>> On 4/27/2019 6:48 PM, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: >>>>>> The input too high only happens into a non-resonant load (tuner in circuit). >>>>>> Also noticed on 20 now when tuner is in operate there is a 3 dB drop in >>>>>> noise floor. >>>>>> This is the second time the 3 watt resistor has desoldered itself from the >>>>>> board and both times the resistor is discolored. >>>>>> Only one RF path from radios through switching into amp input. Amp output >>>>>> feeds a 1x4 antenna switch. No other radios transmitting in near proximity. >>>>>> Definitely something failed on filter board. >>>>>> Dave wo2x >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Paul Baldock >>>>>> Sent: Saturday, April 27, 2019 6:21 PM >>>>>> To: rocketnj at gmail.com; elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>>>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high >>>>>> Try it in to a dummy load. >>>>>> - Paul >>>>>> At 02:48 PM 4/27/2019, rocketnj at gmail.com wrote: >>>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> KPA-1500 s/n 423 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Operating 80 meter SSB running 20 watts drive with tuner engaged for >>>>>>> about >>>>>>> 1240 watts out PEP. Remote app shows maximum power handling of 1620 watts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Out of nowhere I got an input power too high alarm @ 191 watts! The >>>>>>> radio is capable of 100 watts out max and verified is set to 20 watts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Set tune power to 10 watts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Meter in amp during standby reads 10 watts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Switch to operate and immediately get input power too high alarm @ 91 >>>>>> watts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Switch to 20 meters (resonant antenna). No issue - 10 watts tune is >>>>>>> approximately 400 watts out with no error. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any ideas? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Dave wo2x >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>>>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email >>>>>>> list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>> >>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> > From jwin1048 at gmail.com Sun Apr 28 18:00:29 2019 From: jwin1048 at gmail.com (John Wingard) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 18:00:29 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 VCO Alignment Issue In-Reply-To: <9cf860ff-26eb-ae10-2aef-fa316a077bdb@embarqmail.com> References: <35dc40ba-9a64-8875-25f4-cb0e3e3c0be3@embarqmail.com> <9cf860ff-26eb-ae10-2aef-fa316a077bdb@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: Don, Finally got back to the K2 this afternoon. I have confirmed that T5 is on the yellow core, with 16 turns through the center on the red and 4 turns on the green. I mentioned earlier that I got all the toroids from the Toroid Guy, so I felt confident that it was correctly wound. I checked all the relay pins on K13, K14, and K15 and did not see any solder bridges on any of them. Next, I pulled T5 and removed one turn and re-installed. Unfortunately, nothing has changed. I'm still getting that same 8.37 V at R30. Incidentally, I'm getting the 8.37 V on either side of R30. Is that normal? I can also pull T5 and wind a new one with the parts that came with the kit if you think that might help, but something tells me that the problem lies elsewhere. I also thought about pulling C72 and replacing it with another one, but unfortunately there was only one of that value in the kit and I don't have anything like it it my parts stash. Any new thoughts? de John, WB4GLJ On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 6:00 PM Don Wilhelm wrote: > John, > > Both frequencies are too low. > You have either too much capacitance or too much inductance in the VFO. > Count the number of times the red wire goes through the center of the T5 > core - it should be 16. > > Check relays K13, K14 and K15 for solder bridges. > > Make sure the core of T5 is yellow. > You might have to try removing a turn from T5 if you can find no other > cause - there have been a few K2s in the long past where the > permeability if the T5 core was higher than expected, and removing 1 > turn from T5 corrected things - I have not seen that recently, but I do > mention it 'just in case'. > > If all else fails, you may have to "wind your way" through the relay > connections for the VFO Range Select area using the Relay Table on the > Schematic Key page as your guide for the paths through the relays. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/27/2019 5:37 PM, John Wingard wrote: > > Hi Don, > > > > Thanks for the quick response. I did check C72 again. It is a 271 > > value. I then spread the red turns on T5 as far as I could. I'd say > > they cover about 90+% of the toroid. I put the L30 slug at mid-point > > of travel and measured voltage at R30 and it is still right at 8.37 > > V. While there I checked the frequency at TP1 and it was 8247.90, > > which is considerably lower than the 8913 that you expected. > > > > Next I went up to 7100 and measured the voltage at R30. Still right at > > 8.37 V, no change. Frequency at TP1 @ 7100 was 11558.11. > > > > So, it appears that the frequency at 4000 is not within the expected > > range, and likely not at 7100 as well. Hope this tells you something > > because I'm stumped. > > I've got some plans for this evening so I may not get back on it until > > tomorrow afternoon, but if you've got any more things for me to try I > > will do them then. > > > > John, WB4GLJ > > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 1:57 PM Don Wilhelm > > wrote: > > > > John, > > > > That high voltage is trying to reduce the capacity of the varactors. > > Which means there is either too much capacity or too much > > inductance in > > the circuit. > > > > Check the value of C72 first - it should be marked "271". Then set > > the > > L30 slug to about mid-position and spread the red turns of T5 > > enough so > > the starting and ending turns are adjacent. What is the voltage when > > tuned to 4000 kHz? Measure the frequency at TP1 - it should be near > > 8913 kHz. > > > > Then change to 40 meters - 7100 kHz - What is the R30 voltage and > > what > > is the VFO frequency measured at TP1. > > > > The answer to those questions will help in determining what to do > > next. > > > > 73, > > Don W3FPR > > > > On 4/27/2019 1:32 PM, John Wingard wrote: > > > Working on my 2nd K2 (S/N 7869) and have run into a problem with > > the VCO > > > alignment. I'm getting a constant 8.37 V at R30 at 4.000 MHz.. > > I cannot > > > change it with the full range of L30. Correct type inductor is > > installed at > > > L30. Dropping the VFO down to 3.500 doesn't change it either. I > > have gone > > > back through the archives and read just about every post > > concerning this > > > problem but nothing I have tried has made any difference. I have > > double > > > checked all correct parts placements and orientations, re-flowed > all > > > connections in the quadrant of the board around the VCO section. > > T5 is > > > wound as per the manual (from the Toroid Guy) and installed > > correctly. I > > > have tried both spreading and compressing the turns on T5 with > > no change > > > either way. > > > > > > Regarding the thermistor board, I have 4.18 V on pin 5 of U6. > > > > > > Test in the previous section were within specs: > > > > > > 4 MHz Oscillator Cal using CAL FCTR was 12099.61 and confirmed > > with an > > > external counter. > > > Range of the PLL reference oscillator: 12099.61 - 12086.01 = > > 13.59 kHz > > > VCO oscillator test: 8162.60 MHz > > > > > > I'm about out of ideas at this point. What should I start > > checking next? > > > > > > Thanks for any help! > > > > > > 73 de John, WB4GLJ > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > > Elecraft mailing list > > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > > Please help support this email list: > http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > > > > From kennedyjp at cableone.net Sun Apr 28 20:01:16 2019 From: kennedyjp at cableone.net (Jim Kennedy) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 20:01:16 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Elecraft] No Pwr out 20M Message-ID: <1859387641.31126886.1556496076260.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> Hi all, I'm new to the list. Just turned on my K3 and noticed I have no power out on 20 meters. I have performed all the normal trouble shooting stuff. The transmitter is fine on all other bands and has normal 100w output on a Bird 43 and Bird dummy load. It makes no difference if the rig is in bypass or ATU. It flashes HI SWR. I also put it on one of my antennas on another band and the tuner performed as it should. I suspect the ATU has gone wacky but wanted to consult here just on the off chance I may have missed something. Any input would be appreciated before I take a deep dive into the tuner. Thanks in advance for any help. Jim W7OUU From ghyoungman at gmail.com Sun Apr 28 20:04:30 2019 From: ghyoungman at gmail.com (Grant Youngman) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 20:04:30 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] No Pwr out 20M In-Reply-To: <1859387641.31126886.1556496076260.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> References: <1859387641.31126886.1556496076260.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> Message-ID: <88D82512-D61B-4054-B521-A46C5B6166D7@gmail.com> Sounds like you might have inadvertently changed the antenna selection ? e.g., ANT 2 when your antenna is on ANT 1. Grant NQ5T K3 #2091 KX3 #8342 > On Apr 28, 2019, at 8:01 PM, Jim Kennedy wrote: > > Hi all, I'm new to the list. Just turned on my K3 and noticed I have no power out on 20 meters. I have performed all the normal trouble shooting stuff. The transmitter is fine on all other bands and has normal 100w output on a Bird 43 and Bird dummy load. It makes no difference if the rig is in bypass or ATU. It flashes HI SWR. I also put it on one of my antennas on another band and the tuner performed as it should. I suspect the ATU has gone wacky but wanted to consult here just on the off chance I may have missed something. Any input would be appreciated before I take a deep dive into the tuner. Thanks in advance for any help. > > Jim > W7OUU From wc2l at wc2l.com Sun Apr 28 20:14:28 2019 From: wc2l at wc2l.com (William Liporace) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 20:14:28 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S & K3s with newer I/O board Message-ID: <37ccceb6-9342-1e7f-c908-f7dd06b2bef1@wc2l.com> Hi Folks, I am having an issue with the band data out from the K3s and K3S. Both have are basically new. The K3S was NEW in Aug 2018 and the K3s had the I/O board replaced at the same time. Both units have the same issue. They don't seem to be able to drive band data input of a couple of antenna switches. The one switch has a 1K input resistor. If I change them to a 100 ohm resistor, they work fine. So my questions are: Is this normal?Should the band data work on the newer gear? What am I missing? Can someone tell me what to do? yes, I know about the 2.2K resistors, but should I need to? TNX Will WC2L -- William Liporace WC2L http://www.wc2l.com or http://dxc.wc2l.com AR-Cluster Node telnet dxc.wc2l.com or 144.93 MHz wc2l at wc2l.com From jackbrindle at me.com Sun Apr 28 20:29:24 2019 From: jackbrindle at me.com (Jack Brindle) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 17:29:24 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3S & K3s with newer I/O board In-Reply-To: <37ccceb6-9342-1e7f-c908-f7dd06b2bef1@wc2l.com> References: <37ccceb6-9342-1e7f-c908-f7dd06b2bef1@wc2l.com> Message-ID: <3947BD91-9AFE-4E5E-AEDC-37ACA7EEB020@me.com> What are the values of the pulp resistors on the decoders, and what voltage do they pull up to? If 12V, the yes, you really need to worry about the 2.2K resistors and that 1K series. Even at 5V you may have to do so. Work the problem out on paper - simple ohms law. Then determine if the low voltage that is presented to the decoder chip inputs is actually a low to those devices. There are ways to make it work, just need to figure out where things are to start with. 73! Jack, W6FB > On Apr 28, 2019, at 5:14 PM, William Liporace wrote: > > Hi Folks, > I am having an issue with the band data out from the K3s and K3S. Both have are basically new. The K3S was NEW in Aug 2018 and the K3s had the I/O board replaced at the same time. Both units have the same issue. They don't seem to be able to drive band data input of a couple of antenna switches. The one switch has a 1K input resistor. If I change them to a 100 ohm resistor, they work fine. > > So my questions are: > > Is this normal?Should the band data work on the newer gear? > What am I missing? > Can someone tell me what to do? > > yes, I know about the 2.2K resistors, but should I need to? > > TNX Will WC2L > > -- > William Liporace WC2L > http://www.wc2l.com or http://dxc.wc2l.com > AR-Cluster Node telnet dxc.wc2l.com or 144.93 MHz > wc2l at wc2l.com > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From kevinr at coho.net Sun Apr 28 23:08:29 2019 From: kevinr at coho.net (kevinr) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 20:08:29 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Report Message-ID: <1a8fbf03-056b-54ef-e47f-a1ccf8f2c115@coho.net> Good Evening, ?? Both bands had a medium level of QSB; but copy was OK on each of them.? Mostly tales of yard work but Dave was doing antenna work.? He had a much better signal than he did last week.? I had frost last night while Roy had some snow.? I remember skiing in Wisconsin on May 5th so late winter storms are not unusual. ? On 14049.75 kHz at 2200z: K4JPN - Steve - GA K6XK - Roy - IA AB9V - Mike - IN K4TO - Dave - KY ? On 7047.75 kHz at 0000z: W6JHB - Jim - CA K6PJV - Dale - CA The trees on this side of the road must be getting old enough because there are a few Pileated woodpeckers on a scouting mission.? At first I thought I was seeing a crow in the front yard but they don't fly through fir trees.? Then I saw the wing patches and crest.? Females are not as gaudy as their mates.? I'll have to look for the pile of wood chips to see where they wound up. ?? Until next week 73, ?????? Kevin.? KD5ONS _ From frantz at pwpconsult.com Mon Apr 29 01:27:30 2019 From: frantz at pwpconsult.com (Bill Frantz) Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2019 22:27:30 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - DVR installation question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: I've found my DVR handy for calling into large DX pileups. It saves my voice. 73 Bill AE6JV On 4/26/19 at 3:11 PM, k9yeq at live.com (Bill Johnson) wrote: > I rarely use my DVR as I don't contest. When I have a mic or audio xmit > issue, it is super handy. Just sayin'. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz |Security, like correctness, is| Periwinkle (408)356-8506 |not an add-on feature. - Attr-| 16345 Englewood Ave www.pwpconsult.com |ibuted to Andrew Tanenbaum | Los Gatos, CA 95032 From a.durbin at msn.com Mon Apr 29 07:52:52 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:52:52 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high Message-ID: Was the KPA1500 tested at maximum output power and duty cycle with a loading condition that required drive power to be just below the level that would trip the "input power too high" monitor? Is it possible that certain loading conditions would require a drive power level high enough to overheat the input resistor? 73, Andy, k3wyc From rocketnj at gmail.com Mon Apr 29 08:07:55 2019 From: rocketnj at gmail.com (rocketnj at gmail.com) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:07:55 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <002901d4fe84$2e479b90$8ad6d2b0$@gmail.com> Hi Andy I am thinking the reactance the antenna presents to the tuner may have something to do with it. Even though SWR shows about 3.7:1 it may well do with causing the issue. At 3.636 the capacitance is 719 and inductance is 2100. The only band I need a tuner is 80 meters. All other bands are resonant (I do not operate 160) I've opened a service request on the web site as well as following up with a detailed email to support along with operating conditions and log file. The amp will need to visit home to get repaired and updated. Another KPA1500 user with s/n close to mine just got his back from repair and there were a few updates done to his that are definitely not done to mine. Dave wo2x -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Andy Durbin Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 7:53 AM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] KPA-1500 input too high Was the KPA1500 tested at maximum output power and duty cycle with a loading condition that required drive power to be just below the level that would trip the "input power too high" monitor? Is it possible that certain loading conditions would require a drive power level high enough to overheat the input resistor? 73, Andy, k3wyc ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From wv4tn.tn at gmail.com Mon Apr 29 09:22:32 2019 From: wv4tn.tn at gmail.com (Wayne Houser) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 09:22:32 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] ELECRAFT K3S MUST SELL Message-ID: I have a K3S package fully loaded and have used only 3 months that I must sell. This is the Contester/DXer version of the Elecraft website. Also in this package I also have the External Speaker that I will include. Radio has latest firmware updates. I am selling at a 1600.00 discount----I paid 6100.00 for it and letting it go for 4500.00 plus shipping--or you can pick up. Wayne WV4TN From cpa599 at gmail.com Mon Apr 29 09:55:48 2019 From: cpa599 at gmail.com (Terry O) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 09:55:48 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] FS - K3 Message-ID: Elecraft K-3 400HZ CW filter 2.7 SSB filter KTCX03-1 High Stability Reference Oscillator Operation Manual & Construction Manual USB and RS232 ports Excellent. $1600. Free delivery to Dayton Hamvention. I can also deliver along I-75 corridor from Cincinnati to Northern Michigan. Or will ship for actual shipping cost. From rwnewbould at comcast.net Mon Apr 29 12:03:51 2019 From: rwnewbould at comcast.net (Rich) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:03:51 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] 6m Calibration Fails with FW 5.67 Message-ID: <580bd66a-c5fb-d21a-2375-4bdddd440ecb@comcast.net> My K3S fails the 6m calibration with FW 5.67.?? The FW instructions state that *some* KPA3A may go into oscillation, but then states that all KPA3As should use the ATN6 setting for TXGN HP.? Mine will not complete the 50W calibration with ATN6 activated and after the failure I it will only make 50w.? I get a ERR TXGN.? Without ATN6 mine will make 100w just fine.? Also my TXGN LP = 95 which is high based on other threads I have read. All this being said my 6m operation appears fine if I do not use the ATN6.?? I done over the air tests and both TX and RX are good. I am curious to hear if others are seeing this issue and what they have done to resolve it. Rich K3RWN From k9ztv at socket.net Mon Apr 29 12:34:50 2019 From: k9ztv at socket.net (KENT TRIMBLE) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:34:50 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] MAST HOLE FOAM FILLERS Message-ID: <29b90904-99bb-ff99-a668-34fb4b073299@socket.net> There are a number of polyurethane-type foam post-hole fillers on the market (Sika, Rainbow, Secure Set, Poly-Set, Postloc,etc.).? I would appreciate a brief discussion (10 replies maximum) from knowledgeable construction people as to what might be best for the following application. I'm wanting to anchor a 50-foot Max-Gain Systems MK-8-HD fiberglass push-up mast weighing 24 pounds which will support a 5-inch plastic center-insulator bearing 16-gauge open-wire feed-line and ~130 feet of 16-gauge radiator wire. The foam will surround a 3-inch o.d. Schedule-40 PVC pipe in a 3-foot deep hole. I'm prepared to further stabilize the mast above ground with T-posts. Product-knowledgeable replies only, please, especially from utility company personnel who anchor utility poles with this stuff. 73, Kent Trimble, K9ZTV Jefferson City, Missouri --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From kennedyjp at cableone.net Mon Apr 29 13:36:50 2019 From: kennedyjp at cableone.net (Jim Kennedy) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 13:36:50 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Elecraft] No Pwr out 20M In-Reply-To: <88D82512-D61B-4054-B521-A46C5B6166D7@gmail.com> References: <1859387641.31126886.1556496076260.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> <88D82512-D61B-4054-B521-A46C5B6166D7@gmail.com> Message-ID: <226600886.33965038.1556559410774.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> Thanks Grant NQ5T, when I have finished this post I will proceed to go wipe off the egg on my face. I had gone thru all bands to be sure I had the correct antenna port selected but after Grants post I figured I had better check that again and found it to be incorrect. All is good now. What a bonehead move. Sri for using up the bandwidth. After 65 years on the air I should have known better. Anyways, thanks guys. Jim W7OUU ----- Original Message ----- From: "Grant Youngman" To: "elecraft" Cc: "Jim Kennedy" Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2019 6:04:30 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] No Pwr out 20M Sounds like you might have inadvertently changed the antenna selection ? e.g., ANT 2 when your antenna is on ANT 1. Grant NQ5T K3 #2091 KX3 #8342 > On Apr 28, 2019, at 8:01 PM, Jim Kennedy wrote: > > Hi all, I'm new to the list. Just turned on my K3 and noticed I have no power out on 20 meters. I have performed all the normal trouble shooting stuff. The transmitter is fine on all other bands and has normal 100w output on a Bird 43 and Bird dummy load. It makes no difference if the rig is in bypass or ATU. It flashes HI SWR. I also put it on one of my antennas on another band and the tuner performed as it should. I suspect the ATU has gone wacky but wanted to consult here just on the off chance I may have missed something. Any input would be appreciated before I take a deep dive into the tuner. Thanks in advance for any help. > > Jim > W7OUU From markmusick at outlook.com Mon Apr 29 13:48:52 2019 From: markmusick at outlook.com (Mark Musick) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 17:48:52 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] No Pwr out 20M In-Reply-To: <226600886.33965038.1556559410774.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> References: <1859387641.31126886.1556496076260.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> <88D82512-D61B-4054-B521-A46C5B6166D7@gmail.com> <226600886.33965038.1556559410774.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> Message-ID: Not to worry Jim. We have all done it. When I was a novice circa 1969 or 70, I was helping my brother-in-law, WA9ZES trim his freshly made 40 meter dipole. We could not figure out why the SWR never changed. We made it long to begin with, but still expected the SWR to change. After many trips up on the roof on a very cold day he was sitting at the operating desk musing what was wrong and finally noticed he had the antenna switch switched to the wrong antenna. When he switched to the 40 meter dipole the SWR was 1.9:1 and he said good enough. Now that is egg on your face. 73, Mark, WB9CIF -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Jim Kennedy Sent: Monday, April 29, 2019 17:37 To: Grant Youngman Cc: elecraft Subject: Re: [Elecraft] No Pwr out 20M Thanks Grant NQ5T, when I have finished this post I will proceed to go wipe off the egg on my face. I had gone thru all bands to be sure I had the correct antenna port selected but after Grants post I figured I had better check that again and found it to be incorrect. All is good now. What a bonehead move. Sri for using up the bandwidth. After 65 years on the air I should have known better. Anyways, thanks guys. Jim W7OUU ----- Original Message ----- From: "Grant Youngman" To: "elecraft" Cc: "Jim Kennedy" Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2019 6:04:30 PM Subject: Re: [Elecraft] No Pwr out 20M Sounds like you might have inadvertently changed the antenna selection ? e.g., ANT 2 when your antenna is on ANT 1. Grant NQ5T K3 #2091 KX3 #8342 > On Apr 28, 2019, at 8:01 PM, Jim Kennedy wrote: > > Hi all, I'm new to the list. Just turned on my K3 and noticed I have no power out on 20 meters. I have performed all the normal trouble shooting stuff. The transmitter is fine on all other bands and has normal 100w output on a Bird 43 and Bird dummy load. It makes no difference if the rig is in bypass or ATU. It flashes HI SWR. I also put it on one of my antennas on another band and the tuner performed as it should. I suspect the ATU has gone wacky but wanted to consult here just on the off chance I may have missed something. Any input would be appreciated before I take a deep dive into the tuner. Thanks in advance for any help. > > Jim > W7OUU ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From dhaines at bates.edu Mon Apr 29 13:49:00 2019 From: dhaines at bates.edu (David Haines) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 13:49:00 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] No Pwr out 20M In-Reply-To: <226600886.33965038.1556559410774.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> References: <1859387641.31126886.1556496076260.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> <88D82512-D61B-4054-B521-A46C5B6166D7@gmail.com> <226600886.33965038.1556559410774.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> Message-ID: <7af6fe7d-f79a-a070-cb33-9bdf3acd89e3@bates.edu> We all do it, Jim.? At least I do.? A few years ago I spent hours trying to figure out why my new KX3 was shutting off.? Then elecraft_support suggested? it might be because I had set the timer to turn it off.? Duh!. david, kc1dny On 4/29/2019 1:36 PM, Jim Kennedy wrote: > Thanks Grant NQ5T, when I have finished this post I will proceed to go wipe off the egg on my face. I had gone thru all bands to be sure I had the correct antenna port selected but after Grants post I figured I had better check that again and found it to be incorrect. All is good now. What a bonehead move. Sri for using up the bandwidth. After 65 years on the air I should have known better. Anyways, thanks guys. > > Jim > W7OUU > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Grant Youngman" > To: "elecraft" > Cc: "Jim Kennedy" > Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2019 6:04:30 PM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] No Pwr out 20M > > Sounds like you might have inadvertently changed the antenna selection ? e.g., ANT 2 when your antenna is on ANT 1. > > Grant NQ5T > K3 #2091 KX3 #8342 > >> On Apr 28, 2019, at 8:01 PM, Jim Kennedy wrote: >> >> Hi all, I'm new to the list. Just turned on my K3 and noticed I have no power out on 20 meters. I have performed all the normal trouble shooting stuff. The transmitter is fine on all other bands and has normal 100w output on a Bird 43 and Bird dummy load. It makes no difference if the rig is in bypass or ATU. It flashes HI SWR. I also put it on one of my antennas on another band and the tuner performed as it should. I suspect the ATU has gone wacky but wanted to consult here just on the off chance I may have missed something. Any input would be appreciated before I take a deep dive into the tuner. Thanks in advance for any help. >> >> Jim >> W7OUU > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From jim at audiosystemsgroup.com Mon Apr 29 13:52:33 2019 From: jim at audiosystemsgroup.com (Jim Brown) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:52:33 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] FS - K3 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <89e1317d-29a1-8c10-d7e2-a35811dac6ef@audiosystemsgroup.com> Callsign? 73, Jim K9YC From n6tv at arrl.net Mon Apr 29 14:35:05 2019 From: n6tv at arrl.net (Bob Wilson, N6TV) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:35:05 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KPAK3AUX cable length In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Art, The Y-BOX (v2.1 and later) converts any standard (economical) 15-pin M/F DE-15 cable into the equivalent of a KPAK3AUX cable, plus it supports other features not supported by the stock Elecraft cable, such as KPA500 / KPA1500 remote power on/off via a K3 macro (DIGOUT1 to pin 8), and easy insertion of a SteppIR tuning relay Interrupt into the 15-pin cable's keying line (pin 10). It does not work with VGA monitor cables (never used those with any Elecraft product). I offer 15-pin cables with the Y-BOX in both 2.5 ($10) and 5-ft lengths ($12). Connect two M/F 5-ft cables together to get 10 ft. More info at https://bit.ly/Y-BOX . 73, Bob, N6TV On Fri, Apr 26, 2019 at 1:20 PM Art Suberbielle wrote: > Hi all, > > Does Elecraft sell a longer version of the standard cable? I need about 3 > more feet. As an alternative, can 2 of these cables be used in series to > provide the extra length without creating any timing issues for the > KPA1500? > > Thanks & 73, > > Art KZ5D > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From dbthompson at me.com Mon Apr 29 15:10:23 2019 From: dbthompson at me.com (David Thompson) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:10:23 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] No Pwr out 20M In-Reply-To: <226600886.33965038.1556559410774.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> References: <1859387641.31126886.1556496076260.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> <88D82512-D61B-4054-B521-A46C5B6166D7@gmail.com> <226600886.33965038.1556559410774.JavaMail.zimbra@cableone.net> Message-ID: <6788474D-CB9A-48EA-8471-BD18F2FA4E75@me.com> Good afternoon, Jim? Do not be embarrassed. I?m a newly-minted operator and have all kinds of mistakes yet to be made. I can say that I have a lot of experience with computers and cannot tell you how many times the question ?is it plugged in?? should have been the first things I checked. I will not estimate the number of hours spent troubleshooting that particular problem. In any event, problem solved and it was a very simple problem to solve. 73 de AG7TX... David Thompson, AG7TX Jack of All Trades Master of None dbthompson at me.com > On Apr 29, 2019, at 10:36, Jim Kennedy wrote: > > Thanks Grant NQ5T, when I have finished this post I will proceed to go wipe off the egg on my face. I had gone thru all bands to be sure I had the correct antenna port selected but after Grants post I figured I had better check that again and found it to be incorrect. All is good now. What a bonehead move. Sri for using up the bandwidth. After 65 years on the air I should have known better. Anyways, thanks guys. > > Jim > W7OUU > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Grant Youngman" > To: "elecraft" > Cc: "Jim Kennedy" > Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2019 6:04:30 PM > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] No Pwr out 20M > > Sounds like you might have inadvertently changed the antenna selection ? e.g., ANT 2 when your antenna is on ANT 1. > > Grant NQ5T > K3 #2091 KX3 #8342 > >> On Apr 28, 2019, at 8:01 PM, Jim Kennedy wrote: >> >> Hi all, I'm new to the list. Just turned on my K3 and noticed I have no power out on 20 meters. I have performed all the normal trouble shooting stuff. The transmitter is fine on all other bands and has normal 100w output on a Bird 43 and Bird dummy load. It makes no difference if the rig is in bypass or ATU. It flashes HI SWR. I also put it on one of my antennas on another band and the tuner performed as it should. I suspect the ATU has gone wacky but wanted to consult here just on the off chance I may have missed something. Any input would be appreciated before I take a deep dive into the tuner. Thanks in advance for any help. >> >> Jim >> W7OUU > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From rshubbard at me.com Mon Apr 29 15:55:41 2019 From: rshubbard at me.com (richard hubbard) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 20:55:41 +0100 Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft Digest, Vol 179, Issue 34 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <9A8C5B9A-DF5D-41CD-AE40-703C8CA3F00C@me.com> Hello David, I was wondering if you could send me copies of my SA302 for the two last financial years please. Thanks. Best regards, Richard Hubbard Tel: +44 (0)1380 723853 Mob +44 (0)7500019709 Email: rshubbard at me.com > On 24 Mar 2019, at 17:25, elecraft-request at mailman.qth.net wrote: > > Send Elecraft mailing list submissions to > elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > elecraft-request at mailman.qth.net > > You can reach the person managing the list at > elecraft-owner at mailman.qth.net > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Elecraft digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: K1 VFO problem (Tom Johnson) > 2. Elecraft CW Net Announcement (kevinr) > 3. Re: Bouvet (Dave) > 4. Re: K1 VFO problem (Tom Johnson) > 5. Re: K1 VFO problem (Tom Johnson) > 6. Re: Bouvet (Eric Swartz WA6HHQ - Elecraft) > 7. Re: K3/K3s filter setting with the K3 Utility (Gary Smith) > 8. DXCC, Remoting and Moving Around (Dauer, Edward) > 9. Purpose of this group (Bill) > 10. Re: Purpose of this group (jrquark) > 11. Re: Purpose of this group (Roger D Johnson) > 12. Re: Possible OT: Bouvet Island again (Bill W4ZV) > 13. Re: Purpose of this group (W2xj) > 14. K3 Inquiry (Bob Lightner) > 15. Re: K3 Inquiry (Don Wilhelm) > 16. Re: Purpose of this group (Kevin der Kinderen) > 17. Re: K3 Inquiry (Nr4c) > 18. Re: Purpose of this group (W2xj) > 19. Re: Purpose of this group (hawley, charles j jr) > 20. K3s/P3 with SDR Play, Win4K3 & Skimmer (Peter Dougherty) > 21. K3 - 630 meters (Ken Roberson) > 22. Re: K3s/P3 with SDR Play, Win4K3 & Skimmer (Gary Smith) > 23. Re: DXCC, Remoting and Moving Around (ab2tc) > 24. Will there be a K4 (w5sum at comcast.net) > 25. Re: Will there be a K4 (Bob McGraw K4TAX) > 26. Re: Will there be a K4 (Macy monkeys) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 20:11:45 -0700 (MST) > From: Tom Johnson > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K1 VFO problem > Message-ID: <1553397105754-0.post at n2.nabble.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Sorry, Mike! I'm obviously not fully cognizant of how the reflector works. > I thought the original message I was replying to would be included in the > string. It was back from 2013. > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 20:26:16 -0700 > From: kevinr > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: [Elecraft] Elecraft CW Net Announcement > Message-ID: <340a90f6-f06f-a68b-4eed-ecf50e28d1b6 at coho.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > Good Evening, > > ? Yesterday I drove from where there was still snow with my snow drops > just poking through.? At my neighbor's house about 600 feet lower theirs > were blooming.? At about 600 feet below that the daffodils were just > opening.? Another 600 feet and I was in downtown Buxton where the > daffodils were everywhere and tulips were starting.? By the way, the top > of the mountain is about 400 feet above me and the snow is continuous on > the north side facing me. > > ? I took a walk on my land enjoying the period where it's warming up > but there are still no biting flies.? Soon the fern will be six feet > tall or more but now the forest is very open.? I could not find the SW > corner post.? I know I was close but I think a tree grew around it.? The > pileated woodpeckers were making noise but you can hear them for miles.? > Especially when they are taking a tree apart.? I did hear a few > unfamiliar calls; probably passing through on their way north. > > ?? The solar flux is higher than I have seen it in over a year. > Hopefully that means better propagation instead just more noise. We > shall see. > > > Please join us tomorrow on: > > 14050 kHz at 2200z Sunday (3 PM PDT Sunday) > ?7047 kHz at 0000z Monday (5 PM PDT Sunday) > > 73, > Kevin. KD5ONS > > _ > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 23:28:54 -0400 > From: Dave > Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Bouvet > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Rick said it well. > > I have modest antennas compared to big gun stations but I have been able to get 8 band DXCC and 311 countries worked since 2006. All are from my home QTH. I?d be cheating myself if I used a West Coast station to work into Asia. > > I do operate remote. My home station while on vacation or from my office during lunch. But it is still using my QTH. > > I helped my friend set up his station in Hawaii for remote operation and I have operated his station both while there and remotely. I maintain a KH6/ log for those contacts. I have worked Laos from there but never from home. I was thrilled the time I worked Viet Nam from my NJ QTH. > > They don?t call it Honor Roll for nothing. > > Dave wo2x > Vice President > North Jersey DX Association > > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Mar 23, 2019, at 10:17 PM, Fred Jensen wrote: >> >> Agreed Rick and well said. I occasionally operate W7RN [a west coast superstation] remotely. Any DX contacts made will not be claimed for DXCC. The station is close [50 km or so], and it would certainly be within the letter of the rules, but it doesn't feel right. Fortunately, this is all a moot issue for me since, >> >> 1. My occasional operations are usually for specific purposes [not DX] and; >> >> 2. So far, I haven't worked any DX; >> >> 3. And, I may never get around to submitting my claim for a DXCC upgrade from LoTW+cards. >> >> The radio world has changed dramatically since DXCC was invented. I'm really glad I don't have to make/update the rules. >> >> 73, >> Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW >> Sparks NV DM09dn >> Washoe County >> >>> On 3/23/2019 3:24 PM, Rick WA6NHC wrote: >>> While the ARRL has accepted remotes as 'legal' for DXCC credit (a dubious decision) IF the user is within the same entity as the rest of the DXCC entries on the application, it then becomes a moral issue. It's faster than driving around the entity for better propagation, also entirely 'legit'; or owning several stations scattered about (also legal for DXCC and brings up the argument of 'buying' the DXCC, ignored for the moment). >>> >>> Ultimately, all operators must live with the moral choices they've made... no one else can shame or praise them as much as they do to themselves; presuming that each is honest to ones self. >>> >>> I can say with certainty that every entry in my log was made with my radio, using my antenna(s) that I put up personally (sometimes with assistance in this arena). Since I don't really compete against others and my fiercest competition, is me. That is the (moral) choice one must use; to be true to self. I refer to any DXCC standings, simply to see how I'm doing in the overall 'game'. Using my station remotely while traveling, doesn't affect that; it's still MY station. >>> >>> In fairness, not everyone can have a station these days (HOA, budget, space) so there is a place for a remote station... I'm not belittling that. But HOW it's used, is again, a moral choice. For me, having a selection of rented stations about, just to use the best propagation, violates my ethics. Choose wisely, you have to live with yourself. >>> >>> 73 >>> Rick NHC >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 20:48:05 -0700 (MST) > From: Tom Johnson > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K1 VFO problem > Message-ID: <1553399285497-0.post at n2.nabble.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Sorry, Mike! The referred post was from David L DuPuy, March 04, 2013. I > think you answered him and that's where I saw your name. I'm obviously not > adept at using the reflector - I just discovered there were a string of > replies to David I didn't read. > > 73 > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 20:49:24 -0700 (MST) > From: Tom Johnson > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K1 VFO problem > Message-ID: <1553399364825-0.post at n2.nabble.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Sorry, Mike Morrow! The referred post was from David L DuPuy, March 04, > 2013. I think you answered him and that's where I saw your name. I'm > obviously not adept at using the reflector - I just discovered there were a > string of replies to David I didn't read. > > 73 > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 22:32:25 -0700 > From: Eric Swartz WA6HHQ - Elecraft > To: Elecraft list > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Bouvet > Message-ID: <7BC19116-34F6-4CCB-8B8E-A96867D36D63 at elecraft.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Folks, > > This remote station dxcc (or contesting) operation ethics and policy pro/con thread is now closed. > > As regularly noted here previously, OT amateur radio policy, ethics, and related topics, even though they generate passionate opinions, are to be discussed elsewhere. These are endless pro/con discussions that can consume an incredible amount of list bandwidth from a limited number of posters, overloading our other list readers > > In the interest of keeping the Elecraft list readable, without posting volume overload, and interesting to the vast majority of our over 7000 direct subscribers and users of Elecraft gear, these topics are better pursued on other forums. > > 73, > Eric. WA6HHQ > Moderator, even occasionally late at night.. > elecraft.com > --- > Sent from my iPhone 6S > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 02:10:56 -0400 > From: "Gary Smith" > To: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3/K3s filter setting with the K3 Utility > Message-ID: <5C971F70.8757.2096D14A at Gary.ka1j.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > Rich, > > Interesting food for thought. I just > received my 1.8 for the sub RX and was > wondering what others found most helpful > seeing as there are the options to custom > tailor the settings. At the same time, I > really make great use of the narrow filter > on CW and am always looking for something > I can do with what I have that is better > than I have been doing. > > Thanks for your reply. > > 73, > > Gary > KA1J > >> There can be reasons to configure a roofing filter differently from >> its nominal bandwidth. >> >> For example, I have a "250 Hz" filter. According to the filter plots >> on the Elecraft web site, the 6 dB bandwidth of this filter is >> actually closer to 375 Hz. I configured my filter to switch in at 350 >> Hz, which makes it much more useful to me than it would be if I had >> configured it to switch in at 250 Hz. >> >> If this filter is configured to switch in at 250 Hz in agreement with >> the label, then when you set your DSP bandwidth to 300 Hz or 350 Hz, >> you will be using the next wider filter in your receiver. Strong >> signals outside the DSP bandwidth but inside the wider roofing >> filter's bandwidth can still have bad effects, whereas if the filter >> is configured to switch in at 350 Hz, you can take advantage of its >> ability to reduce those unwanted signals with relatively minor impact >> on signals within the DSP bandwidth. >> >> Of course, if the bandwidth of the 250 Hz filter really was 250 Hz, >> configuring it to switch in at 350 Hz would render the 300 Hz and 350 >> Hz settings of the DSP filter somewhat less useful, since the actual >> bandwidth of the filter combination would now be close to 250 Hz >> regardless of what the DSP control said. >> >> There might be reasons to go in the other direction as well, i.e. to >> configure a filter to switch in only at a narrower bandwidth than the >> bandwidth marked on the filter. For example, if you had 500 Hz and >> 1000 Hz filters and often used a digital mode whose bandwidth was, >> say, 750 Hz, you could configure the 1000 Hz roofing filter to switch >> in only at 700 Hz and below. This would give you better filtering >> between 500 Hz and 700 Hz than without the 1000 Hz filter, while still >> permitting the 750 Hz mode signals to pass through at DSP settings of >> 750 Hz and above without being restricted by the roofing filter. >> >> 73, >> Rich VE3KI >> >> >> KA1J wrote: >> >> Is there any advantage to setting the 1.8 >> above, say as 2. in the utility. >> >> Or to have the 200Hz filter engaged at say >> 250? >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 07:20:07 +0000 > From: "Dauer, Edward" > To: "elecraft at mailman.qth.net" > Subject: [Elecraft] DXCC, Remoting and Moving Around > Message-ID: <70BB6CED-CD44-4A94-B7F4-7E55EFFF1728 at law.du.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > It is reported that Glanville Williams, a now SK Professor of Jurisprudence at University College London, once quipped that, "The difference between a difference in kind and a difference in degree is almost always a difference in degree." I can't verify that, but it's a well-cited legend in my field. > > The problems of remoting and moving raised for DXCC, whose rule is all-too simple, were inevitable in an Internet environment and really ought to be updated. But how? > > I began again as Jim did when I moved from Connecticut, at ocean's edge, to Colorado on mountain's peak, although under the DXCC rules my official standing -- which isn't much anyway -- combines the two. I didn't move for that purpose; but that shouldn't matter. > > Remoting is more subtle. My fixed station is at my mountain QTH, 100 miles from Denver. My Denver home is HOA-limited and due to foil-backed insulation in every wall is effectively a Faraday cage. I am looking into remoting by Internet over that 100 miles. If I do that, I personally would be comfortable adding any new ones to the ones I got while sitting on the mountain. But there is no way I would feel right about adding an ATNO I snagged if I rented a station on the Atlantic or Pacific coast for the occasion and remoted from Denver to there. Is that a difference in kind, because I own one and don't own the other? A difference in degree because one's 100 miles and the other is over 1,000? How about if I had a summer place on Nantucket and I personally owned the equipment there, operating it remotely from Colorado? A difference in kind, or a difference in degree? > > Again, and as others have said, I compete for me and against me, and I know from where I snagged what. But some hams compete against other hams and that is, generally speaking, to the good as well. So what should the rules be? The WAS rule, I believe, says within a 50 mile radius. I am one QSL short of 5BWAS because NE on 10 from my side of the Continental Divide in CO has eluded me for more than a decade. I could drive to the CO/NE state line with a KX3 in the car but that would be a rule violation, so I haven't. Should there be a radius limit for DXCC as well? Should remoting be a separate rule of some sort? > > I think Professor Williams, who so far as I know was not a ham, would have enjoyed this imbroglio. > > Ted, KN1CBR > ------------------------------ > > Message: 22 > Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 19:17:21 -0700 > From: Fred Jensen > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Bouvet > Message-ID: <0d812939-ee8b-31ef-2258-0980a159d87d at foothill.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > I wonder sometimes if DXCC has become an oxymoron of magnitude similar > to NTS?? When originally conceived, actually contacting 100 "countries" > was a huge endeavor.? Even making transoceanic contacts between the > largest of stations was very difficult.? Today's world is so very very > different.? When So. Sudan showed up, a new-ish ham said to me, "I've > never seen such pileups!"? I told him, "ATNO for everyone and those who > sit at the top of the list with 'all' of them need to keep their seats." > > After I worked BS7H, I showed my wife a photo of W6RGG at one of the > positions.? She said, "You count that rock as a country?"? I started to > explain and then passed, the rock is claimed by more than one country of > course and I'd already been through it with her over VP6DI. > > As I said when I started this, I just wondered recently while in the shower. > > 73, > Fred ["Skip"] K6DGW > Sparks NV DM09dn > Washoe County > > On 3/23/2019 6:52 PM, Jim Brown wrote: >> ?On 3/23/2019 2:34 PM, ab2tc wrote: >>> But if I work Bouvet using this remote, can I really claim >>> DXCC credit for myself for it? >> DXCC rules say that you can count a QSO made from any STATION location >> (that is, where RF is transmitted and received,) anywhere in the lower >> 48 states. >>> It would seem exceptionally unfair. Doesn't >>> ARRL have a rule for as how far you can move from place to place and >>> still >>> claim accumulated DXCC credits? >> >> Yep. >> >>> I find this highly troubling. >> >> Me too. When I moved from Chicago to NorCal 12 years ago I started >> over with DXCC. There's a guy who takes pride in being at/near the top >> of DXCC on 160M, but he started in CO, then moved to NC.? I strongly >> approve of operating remotely from a station that is close to you, >> especially if you built the station!? I view with contempt those who >> would use remote operation of a station much much closer to DX than >> their own, or even rent that station and travel to it, and count QSOs >> made from that station for DXCC. >> >> 73, Jim K9YC > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 08:40:30 -0400 > From: Bill > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: [Elecraft] Purpose of this group > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > I have been under the assumption that this group existed as a technical > support center for owners/users of Elecraft equipment: A place to ask > questions and learn about the operation and use of said equipment. > > I see no reason for long discussions regarding DX/contest operations, > the rules, politics, or other trivia of same in this group - a group > supporting the technical issues of owners/users. > > Am I correct that this is a technical group? Or, is posting space to be > taken up by non-technical discussions of which many users have no interest? > > Bill W2BLC owner/user > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 10 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 08:55:06 -0400 > From: jrquark > To: Bill > Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Purpose of this group > Message-ID: <6AA7B7DF-01EF-4475-8336-76F565FA196F at me.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Yes and yes, plus many of us are quite practiced in using the delete key. > > I own a K3s and I have no difficulty in skimming through the comments that are beyond my interests. But, I have found interesting, informative and instructive topics, often not related to my K3s. > > Your milage may differ? > > James Forsman > jamesforsman at me.com > https://jrquark.smugmug.com/HamRadio > > > >> On Mar 24, 2019, at 8:40 AM, Bill wrote: >> >> Am I correct that this is a technical group? Or, is posting space to be taken up by non-technical discussions of which many users have no interest? > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 11 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 09:57:09 -0400 > From: Roger D Johnson > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Purpose of this group > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed > > I have no interest in most of the technical discussions. > > Roger N1RJ > > On 3/24/2019 8:40 AM, Bill wrote: > >> >> Am I correct that this is a technical group? Or, is posting space to be taken up >> by non-technical discussions of which many users have no interest? >> >> Bill W2BLC owner/user >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 12 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 07:10:44 -0700 (MST) > From: Bill W4ZV > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Possible OT: Bouvet Island again > Message-ID: <1553436644108-0.post at n2.nabble.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > ab2tc wrote >> PS. I am guessing if they have any Elecraft equipment we would have heard >> about it here. > > I don't know but Dom 3Z9DX bought a K3 from me in May 2017. I had upgraded > to an 86XX S/N and sold him my 47XX S/N. > > 73, Bill W4ZV > > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 13 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:14:08 -0400 > From: W2xj > To: Roger D Johnson > Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Purpose of this group > Message-ID: <874A1D71-7347-4E36-B447-C729A458B241 at w2xj.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Nor do I but I think this group is excessively over moderated. OT discussions are usually the most interesting but causes the moderator to have issues. > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Mar 24, 2019, at 9:57 AM, Roger D Johnson wrote: >> >> I have no interest in most of the technical discussions. >> >> Roger N1RJ >> >>> On 3/24/2019 8:40 AM, Bill wrote: >>> >>> Am I correct that this is a technical group? Or, is posting space to be taken up by non-technical discussions of which many users have no interest? >>> Bill W2BLC owner/user >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 14 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:46:53 -0400 > From: Bob Lightner > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: [Elecraft] K3 Inquiry > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > My High School club station, K4WTL, uses a K3 for CW. It works great! > Recently we tried to transmit on SSB. The radio doesn't seem to want to > transmit audio. The Elecraft hand mic is plugged into the front and the > menu confirms that. The Mode is correct and the firmware is up-to-date. We > have substituted microphones and nothing seems to solve the problem. Have > any of you had similar problems??? Bob/W4GJ, trustee for K4WTL. > > -- > > Astronomy compels the soul to look upwards and leads us from this > world to another. > > Plato, The Republic > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 15 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 11:04:44 -0400 > From: Don Wilhelm > To: Bob Lightner , elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Inquiry > Message-ID: <3b0f8fd4-a0b4-2343-f636-ee540e7991d8 at embarqmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > > Bob, > > Is the MIC SEL set to "FP.L bias"? > If bias is not applied, there will be no audio from that mic - it uses > an electret type element. > The default is bias OFF - because the bias could harm dynamic type > microphones. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 3/24/2019 10:46 AM, Bob Lightner wrote: >> My High School club station, K4WTL, uses a K3 for CW. It works great! >> Recently we tried to transmit on SSB. The radio doesn't seem to want to >> transmit audio. The Elecraft hand mic is plugged into the front and the >> menu confirms that. The Mode is correct and the firmware is up-to-date. We >> have substituted microphones and nothing seems to solve the problem. Have >> any of you had similar problems??? Bob/W4GJ, trustee for K4WTL. >> > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 16 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 11:07:43 -0400 > From: Kevin der Kinderen > To: Elecraft Reflector Reflector > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Purpose of this group > Message-ID: > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > A little flexibility in the content keeps it interesting. Delete key works > fine. I probably delete 90+ percent of all the emails I receive from the > few groups I follow. Maybe an odd thing but I like to follow the OT > comments on the weekends. > > If strict content control is a requirement consider a book, newspaper or > magazine and skip the editorials and opinion columns. They usually stay on > topic and don't allow the conversation to stray. > > OT stuff has a pretty short life here. Apparently not short enough for some. > > 73, > Kev K4VD > > On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 10:14 AM W2xj wrote: > >> Nor do I but I think this group is excessively over moderated. OT >> discussions are usually the most interesting but causes the moderator to >> have issues. >> >> Sent from my iPad >> >>> On Mar 24, 2019, at 9:57 AM, Roger D Johnson >> wrote: >>> >>> I have no interest in most of the technical discussions. >>> >>> Roger N1RJ >>> >>>> On 3/24/2019 8:40 AM, Bill wrote: >>>> >>>> Am I correct that this is a technical group? Or, is posting space to be >> taken up by non-technical discussions of which many users have no interest? >>>> Bill W2BLC owner/user >>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 17 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 11:10:33 -0400 > From: Nr4c > To: Bob Lightner > Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 Inquiry > Message-ID: <64296858-61C0-4C18-8A3E-A697086B7E9C at widomaker.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Most likely problem is: the Elecraft mic (MH2 or MH4) is an electret mic and requires that a bias voltage be present on the audio pin. The MicSel should read ?fPL bias?. If ?bias? is not shown, press the ?2? button on the panel to right if display to toggle the bias. > > If MicSel shows fPH, press the ?1? button to toggle H/L. > > Sent from my iPhone > ...nr4c. bill > > >> On Mar 24, 2019, at 10:46 AM, Bob Lightner wrote: >> >> My High School club station, K4WTL, uses a K3 for CW. It works great! >> Recently we tried to transmit on SSB. The radio doesn't seem to want to >> transmit audio. The Elecraft hand mic is plugged into the front and the >> menu confirms that. The Mode is correct and the firmware is up-to-date. We >> have substituted microphones and nothing seems to solve the problem. Have >> any of you had similar problems??? Bob/W4GJ, trustee for K4WTL. >> >> -- >> >> Astronomy compels the soul to look upwards and leads us from this >> world to another. >> >> Plato, The Republic >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 18 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 11:23:05 -0400 > From: W2xj > To: Kevin der Kinderen > Cc: Elecraft Reflector Reflector > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Purpose of this group > Message-ID: <9ED5916F-49CE-41C9-B797-B4E2758AF27A at w2xj.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > I have every list email I have received since 1992. I have been able to re-build list archives. I have never understood this ?bandwidth? or size limit garbage. Most have nearly unlimited bandwidth and more storage than needed for email. I find digests and web views more offensive. > > Sent from my iPad > >> On Mar 24, 2019, at 11:07 AM, Kevin der Kinderen wrote: >> >> A little flexibility in the content keeps it interesting. Delete key works >> fine. I probably delete 90+ percent of all the emails I receive from the >> few groups I follow. Maybe an odd thing but I like to follow the OT >> comments on the weekends. >> >> If strict content control is a requirement consider a book, newspaper or >> magazine and skip the editorials and opinion columns. They usually stay on >> topic and don't allow the conversation to stray. >> >> OT stuff has a pretty short life here. Apparently not short enough for some. >> >> 73, >> Kev K4VD >> >>> On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 10:14 AM W2xj wrote: >>> >>> Nor do I but I think this group is excessively over moderated. OT >>> discussions are usually the most interesting but causes the moderator to >>> have issues. >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>>> On Mar 24, 2019, at 9:57 AM, Roger D Johnson >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I have no interest in most of the technical discussions. >>>> >>>> Roger N1RJ >>>> >>>>> On 3/24/2019 8:40 AM, Bill wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Am I correct that this is a technical group? Or, is posting space to be >>> taken up by non-technical discussions of which many users have no interest? >>>>> Bill W2BLC owner/user >>>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>> >>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>> >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 19 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 15:32:18 +0000 > From: "hawley, charles j jr" > Cc: Elecraft Reflector Reflector > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Purpose of this group > Message-ID: <3D4CC21A-C5D3-4024-99F7-35D1599B261C at illinois.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > The first post wasn?t technical... > > Chuck Jack > KE9UW > > Sent from my iPhone, cjack > >> On Mar 24, 2019, at 10:08 AM, Kevin der Kinderen wrote: >> >> A little flexibility in the content keeps it interesting. Delete key works >> fine. I probably delete 90+ percent of all the emails I receive from the >> few groups I follow. Maybe an odd thing but I like to follow the OT >> comments on the weekends. >> >> If strict content control is a requirement consider a book, newspaper or >> magazine and skip the editorials and opinion columns. They usually stay on >> topic and don't allow the conversation to stray. >> >> OT stuff has a pretty short life here. Apparently not short enough for some. >> >> 73, >> Kev K4VD >> >>> On Sun, Mar 24, 2019 at 10:14 AM W2xj wrote: >>> >>> Nor do I but I think this group is excessively over moderated. OT >>> discussions are usually the most interesting but causes the moderator to >>> have issues. >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>>> On Mar 24, 2019, at 9:57 AM, Roger D Johnson >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I have no interest in most of the technical discussions. >>>> >>>> Roger N1RJ >>>> >>>>> On 3/24/2019 8:40 AM, Bill wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Am I correct that this is a technical group? Or, is posting space to be >>> taken up by non-technical discussions of which many users have no interest? >>>>> Bill W2BLC owner/user >>>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>> ______________________________________________________________ >>>> Elecraft mailing list >>>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>>> >>>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>>> >>> >>> ______________________________________________________________ >>> Elecraft mailing list >>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >>> >>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >>> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 20 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 11:37:03 -0400 > From: "Peter Dougherty" > To: > Subject: [Elecraft] K3s/P3 with SDR Play, Win4K3 & Skimmer > Message-ID: <006601d4e257$6ea49920$4bedcb60$@w2irt.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > Hello all. > > > > I would like to know if anybody is successfully running their K3/K3s with > (specifically) an SDRPlay, Win4K3 software, and CW Skimmer, and if so, how > did you hook it all together? > > > > My thought is to start reading up now, and then buy the hardware and > software at Dayton this year and play with it over the summer before contest > season starts. > > I'm specifically curious about getting RF into the SDRPlay. Do you use the > IF connection out from the P3, or something else? I have three antennas > coming in to my K3s at the moment: the primary TX/RX feed on ANT-1, a K9AY > receive antenna on RX IN, and an untuned vertical wire connected to the AUX > antenna port, which is used only for diversity reception. The radio is > connected via the USB interface exclusively, with no analog sound > connections at the moment. > > I don't plan to use this configuration for normal day-to-day operating. I'm > quite happy using the K3 as a conventional radio and just using the P3 as a > bandscope. This will be exclusively for CW contesting, and CW Dxpedition > pileups. > > One final question for those who have accomplished this successfully, which > model SDRplay are you using, and is there a specific reason for recommending > one version over another at this point? Thanks again! > > > --------------------------------------------- > 73 and Good DX > Peter, W2IRT > > > > President, North Jersey DX Association > > DXCC Card Checker > Letter O Manager, ARRL Incoming 2nd District QSL bureau > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 21 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 15:41:39 +0000 (UTC) > From: Ken Roberson > To: Elecraft Reflector > Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - 630 meters > Message-ID: <530500934.9190460.1553442099604 at mail.yahoo.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > > Hello K3 owners, > > For sale 630M 100W power Amp designed to work with K3 or K3s. > > 1 mw from the transverter output will drive this PWR-AMP to 100Woutput. > > More info on my web-site k5dnl dot com. > > 73 Ken K5DNL > > ? > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 22 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 12:40:46 -0400 > From: "Gary Smith" > To: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3s/P3 with SDR Play, Win4K3 & Skimmer > Message-ID: <5C97B30E.13250.22D76C31 at Gary.ka1j.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > > I can only speak to Win4K3Suite. > > There are two components to be installed > by the user, the program and com0com, the > latter is used to assign ports so > Win4K3Suite can utilize the multi virtual > port feature. > > It is simple to do both but you must > follow the directions which are laid out > well. > > There are many features of it that I don't > use but to everything I use it for with > the K3s & K3, it is perfect. > > 73, > > Gary > KA1J > >> Hello all. >> >> >> >> I would like to know if anybody is successfully running their K3/K3s >> with (specifically) an SDRPlay, Win4K3 software, and CW Skimmer, and >> if so, how did you hook it all together? >> >> >> >> My thought is to start reading up now, and then buy the hardware and >> software at Dayton this year and play with it over the summer before >> contest season starts. >> >> I'm specifically curious about getting RF into the SDRPlay. Do you use >> the IF connection out from the P3, or something else? I have three >> antennas coming in to my K3s at the moment: the primary TX/RX feed on >> ANT-1, a K9AY receive antenna on RX IN, and an untuned vertical wire >> connected to the AUX antenna port, which is used only for diversity >> reception. The radio is connected via the USB interface exclusively, >> with no analog sound connections at the moment. >> >> I don't plan to use this configuration for normal day-to-day >> operating. I'm quite happy using the K3 as a conventional radio and >> just using the P3 as a bandscope. This will be exclusively for CW >> contesting, and CW Dxpedition pileups. >> >> One final question for those who have accomplished this successfully, >> which model SDRplay are you using, and is there a specific reason for >> recommending one version over another at this point? Thanks again! >> >> >> --------------------------------------------- >> 73 and Good DX >> Peter, W2IRT >> >> >> >> President, North Jersey DX Association >> >> DXCC Card Checker >> Letter O Manager, ARRL Incoming 2nd District QSL bureau >> >> >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html >> > > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 23 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 09:44:23 -0700 (MST) > From: ab2tc > To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] DXCC, Remoting and Moving Around > Message-ID: <1553445863264-0.post at n2.nabble.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Hi, > > The following snippet is from a recent posting by Ted, KN1CBR: > > "So what should the rules be? The WAS rule, I believe, says within a 50 > mile radius. I am one QSL short of 5BWAS because NE on 10 from my side of > the Continental Divide in CO has eluded me for more than a decade. I could > drive to the CO/NE state line with a KX3 in the car but that would be a rule > violation, so I haven't. Should there be a radius limit for DXCC as well?" > > Adopting the 50 mile radius for DXCC as well as WAS seems a very reasonable > idea. It seems to be manageable for WAS so why wouldn't it be for DXCC, too. > I wasn't aware of the 50 mile radius for WAS. I have multiband WAS all done > from one location. > > AB2TC - Knut > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 24 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 12:16:15 -0500 > From: > To: > Subject: [Elecraft] Will there be a K4 > Message-ID: > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" > > Before I spend money on a K3S, I?m just curious.. is a K4 in the planning stages? I bought my K3 and unpackaged it and just days later the K3S was announced. I was livid.. LOL > > so.. what say Elecraft? > > Ronnie W5SUM > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 25 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 12:22:34 -0500 > From: Bob McGraw K4TAX > To: w5sum at comcast.net > Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Will there be a K4 > Message-ID: <80A88356-A14E-4046-8B43-A739C33783F3 at blomand.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > Wait and see or roll the dice ? > > Bob, K4TAX > > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Mar 24, 2019, at 12:16 PM, wrote: >> >> Before I spend money on a K3S, I?m just curious.. is a K4 in the planning stages? I bought my K3 and unpackaged it and just days later the K3S was announced. I was livid.. LOL >> >> so.. what say Elecraft? >> >> Ronnie W5SUM >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 26 > Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 10:25:22 -0700 > From: Macy monkeys > To: w5sum at comcast.net > Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net > Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Will there be a K4 > Message-ID: <331D9FAF-FB17-4B06-95B8-DB420EC20084 at charter.net> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > > It will be announced just after you unpack your new K3S :) > > John K7FD > >> On Mar 24, 2019, at 10:16 AM, wrote: >> >> Before I spend money on a K3S, I?m just curious.. is a K4 in the planning stages? I bought my K3 and unpackaged it and just days later the K3S was announced. I was livid.. LOL >> >> so.. what say Elecraft? >> >> Ronnie W5SUM >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > ------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Post to: Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > You must be a subscriber to post. > Elecraft web page: http://www.elecraft.com > > End of Elecraft Digest, Vol 179, Issue 34 > ***************************************** From glcazzola at alice.it Mon Apr 29 17:08:38 2019 From: glcazzola at alice.it (IK4EWX) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 14:08:38 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] New bug, popping on dah side In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <1556572118863-0.post@n2.nabble.com> I have an Elecraft K3S with last software release. I use it with my Begali Intrepid and my Vibroplex Presentation mod. 1964. Always, I make at least 5 qsos/day, at speed 15-22wpm Same firmware release ago, I had problems with the Vibroplex Presentation, I dont remember exactly the message on the K3s screen but it give an error when manipulating the bug. After setting better the Vibroplex Presentation, with better dots contact regulation, as suggested by GM4GZQ "Adjusting your bug" article, the problem has been solved. Only with one of the last release of firmware the problem returned, but now, with last 5.67 version, I have no problem with Vibroplex or Intrepid. The Intrepid anyway have a lot less bounces on dots contact than the Vibroplex. The K3S doesnt like very much contact bounces, anyway if you reduce them there are not problems at all. Ian IK4EWX -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From w2blc at nycap.rr.com Mon Apr 29 19:46:42 2019 From: w2blc at nycap.rr.com (Bill) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:46:42 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] MAST HOLE FOAM FILLERS In-Reply-To: <29b90904-99bb-ff99-a668-34fb4b073299@socket.net> References: <29b90904-99bb-ff99-a668-34fb4b073299@socket.net> Message-ID: <0970e6bb-40c4-d808-e8ce-583eefe63330@nycap.rr.com> A PVC mast 3' into the ground will easily break off - use 2" galvanized pipe and allow several feet above the grass level. This will allow you to connect the 50' mast to same. Best to make a swivel mount several feet off the grass level to allow for putting it up and down. You must guy this tower every 10 feet or it will do the dance in the wind. For a light weight installation that is well guyed you can use post setting mix. You should use a tube and make a mushroom at the bottom to keep frost heaving at bay. Guying is very important - you will gain most of your wind resistance strength from it. It will not survive even modest winds without guying. I do something similar with a 25' piece of 2" aluminum pipe fastened at the grass level to an 8' T-post driven in 4'. The tower is guyed at 12' and the top. Guys go to T-posts and are tied off above 4' to provide for easy mowing. T-posts must be the heavy cast types - rolled are just junk and will easily fold under any load. My NVIS wire antennas (75 and 40 meters) have survived in excess of 70 MPH winds with no problems at all. My system has been up for about 10 years without any failures. Just remember, 50' is about four times more of a problem than my 25'. Also, aluminum pipe, although more expensive, will be much more solid than any plastic tube. Bill W2BLC From dgdimick at gmail.com Mon Apr 29 20:11:43 2019 From: dgdimick at gmail.com (Denis Dimick) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 18:11:43 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] K1 LED upgrade In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Don, The kit showed up yesterday, and just wanted to thank you for it. Denis KC6AUP -------------------------------------- There is no future until we settle our past... On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 9:06 AM Don Wilhelm wrote: > Denis, > > Are you referring to the K1 LCD Backlight Kit for a built K1? If so, I > have one available. $29.95 plus shipping. > Please let me know if you want it and I can compute the shipping cost - > USPS Priority Mail. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/24/2019 10:24 AM, Denis Dimick wrote: > > I was wondering if anyone has a LCD LED upgrade they would be willing to > > part with? > > > > Denis > > KC6AUP > From w5tm001 at gmail.com Mon Apr 29 22:35:53 2019 From: w5tm001 at gmail.com (Ed gilliland) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:35:53 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 LOW GAIN FAULT Message-ID: <3906a3b1-a99f-e851-9047-5559819f66a9@gmail.com> My KPA1500 is faulting with a low gain alarm ration 6.? This is with 23 watts input 160-10 meters.? Any advice? Thanks, Ed W5TM From ldormiston at gmail.com Mon Apr 29 23:07:16 2019 From: ldormiston at gmail.com (Lee Ormiston) Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 21:07:16 -0600 Subject: [Elecraft] MAST HOLE FOAM FILLERS In-Reply-To: <0970e6bb-40c4-d808-e8ce-583eefe63330@nycap.rr.com> References: <29b90904-99bb-ff99-a668-34fb4b073299@socket.net> <0970e6bb-40c4-d808-e8ce-583eefe63330@nycap.rr.com> Message-ID: Kent, Suggest you read and perform the calculations in Calculating the Required Mast Strength section of *ARRL Antenna Book. *You will also want to search NWS.gov web site for Maximum Recorded Wind Gust speed at weather reporting stations nearest you. NORRL Lee On Mon, Apr 29, 2019 at 5:47 PM Bill wrote: > A PVC mast 3' into the ground will easily break off - use 2" galvanized > pipe and allow several feet above the grass level. This will allow you > to connect the 50' mast to same. Best to make a swivel mount several > feet off the grass level to allow for putting it up and down. You must > guy this tower every 10 feet or it will do the dance in the wind. For a > light weight installation that is well guyed you can use post setting > mix. You should use a tube and make a mushroom at the bottom to keep > frost heaving at bay. > > Guying is very important - you will gain most of your wind resistance > strength from it. It will not survive even modest winds without guying. > > I do something similar with a 25' piece of 2" aluminum pipe fastened at > the grass level to an 8' T-post driven in 4'. The tower is guyed at 12' > and the top. Guys go to T-posts and are tied off above 4' to provide for > easy mowing. T-posts must be the heavy cast types - rolled are just junk > and will easily fold under any load. > > My NVIS wire antennas (75 and 40 meters) have survived in excess of 70 > MPH winds with no problems at all. My system has been up for about 10 > years without any failures. > > Just remember, 50' is about four times more of a problem than my 25'. > Also, aluminum pipe, although more expensive, will be much more solid > than any plastic tube. > > Bill W2BLC > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > From k2vco.vic at gmail.com Tue Apr 30 02:21:48 2019 From: k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Vic Rosenthal) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:21:48 +0300 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 LOW GAIN FAULT In-Reply-To: <3906a3b1-a99f-e851-9047-5559819f66a9@gmail.com> References: <3906a3b1-a99f-e851-9047-5559819f66a9@gmail.com> Message-ID: <437B745F-D38F-41CA-B1F5-94B76D014CE6@gmail.com> The first thing to do with any amplifier failure is to try it with a dummy load. If the problem still occurs, you can rule out SWR or RF feedback problems. It doesn?t seem like any of the above if it occurs on all bands, but it?s easy and a good start to a systematic diagnosis. Victor 4X6GP > On 30 Apr 2019, at 5:35, Ed gilliland wrote: > > My KPA1500 is faulting with a low gain alarm ration 6. This is with 23 watts input 160-10 meters. Any advice? > > Thanks, Ed W5TM > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From billamader at gmail.com Tue Apr 30 09:58:12 2019 From: billamader at gmail.com (K8TE) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 06:58:12 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - DVR installation question In-Reply-To: References: <7eab21ca-532d-65dd-dcf2-bd6da26bd775@nycap.rr.com> <4427db0b-5ea7-553d-04e8-47847a3e858e@nycap.rr.com> Message-ID: <1556632692275-0.post@n2.nabble.com> In addition to contesting, I use it to call friends for a pre-setup sked. They often don't show-up on-time or can't make it. I quit after five minutes with no response. During FD several years ago, I took over the 40m station after a nearby lightning strike took out the primary K3. The back-up had no DVR. That was the longest four hours of the event (not a contest)! I have also used the DVR for Special Event Station operations when the rates slow down. I wouldn't be without a DVR in my K3's! 73, Bill, K8TE -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From dick at elecraft.com Tue Apr 30 10:17:22 2019 From: dick at elecraft.com (Dick Dievendorff) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:17:22 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - DVR installation question In-Reply-To: <1556632692275-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <7eab21ca-532d-65dd-dcf2-bd6da26bd775@nycap.rr.com> <4427db0b-5ea7-553d-04e8-47847a3e858e@nycap.rr.com> <1556632692275-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Bill: I use mine in DX pileups, as I tend to get enthusiastic and holler my call, which could become tedious to my wife. M1 has my call, M2 has ?thanks, you?re also 59?. CW memories for M1 and M2 have similar function. I tend to use M1 less often and M2 sooner since the arrival of my KPA1500. Good to meet you in Visalia! 73 de Dick, K6KR > On Apr 30, 2019, at 13:58, K8TE wrote: > > In addition to contesting, I use it to call friends for a pre-setup sked. > They often don't show-up on-time or can't make it. I quit after five > minutes with no response. > > During FD several years ago, I took over the 40m station after a nearby > lightning strike took out the primary K3. The back-up had no DVR. That was > the longest four hours of the event (not a contest)! > > I have also used the DVR for Special Event Station operations when the rates > slow down. I wouldn't be without a DVR in my K3's! > > From rmcgraw at blomand.net Tue Apr 30 10:33:12 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 09:33:12 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - DVR installation question In-Reply-To: References: <7eab21ca-532d-65dd-dcf2-bd6da26bd775@nycap.rr.com> <4427db0b-5ea7-553d-04e8-47847a3e858e@nycap.rr.com> <1556632692275-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: <07b8d1d7-d878-7fb0-3e1f-eb4fc0504f0f@blomand.net> I use AUDACITY which is a free software, record my own messages, set it to? play a loop and let it feed the radio.? It can be used for most all modes, SSB and CW.???? I have several pre-recorded messages which I can easily choose.?? All that is needed is the free software, and a single USB cable between the computer and my K3S. Set the input to MIC + LIN and turn on the VOX.? A few level tweaks and one is off and running. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/30/2019 9:17 AM, Dick Dievendorff wrote: > Bill: I use mine in DX pileups, as I tend to get enthusiastic and holler my call, which could become tedious to my wife. M1 has my call, M2 has ?thanks, you?re also 59?. CW memories for M1 and M2 have similar function. > > I tend to use M1 less often and M2 sooner since the arrival of my KPA1500. > > Good to meet you in Visalia! > > 73 de Dick, K6KR > >> On Apr 30, 2019, at 13:58, K8TE wrote: >> >> In addition to contesting, I use it to call friends for a pre-setup sked. >> They often don't show-up on-time or can't make it. I quit after five >> minutes with no response. >> >> During FD several years ago, I took over the 40m station after a nearby >> lightning strike took out the primary K3. The back-up had no DVR. That was >> the longest four hours of the event (not a contest)! >> >> I have also used the DVR for Special Event Station operations when the rates >> slow down. I wouldn't be without a DVR in my K3's! >> >> > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From eric at elecraft.com Tue Apr 30 13:28:13 2019 From: eric at elecraft.com (Eric Swartz - WA6HHQ, Elecraft) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 10:28:13 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 LOW GAIN FAULT In-Reply-To: <3906a3b1-a99f-e851-9047-5559819f66a9@gmail.com> References: <3906a3b1-a99f-e851-9047-5559819f66a9@gmail.com> Message-ID: <65a4a7a5-ebba-4c20-da98-f0d1d31c5a1b@elecraft.com> Hi Ed, Please email support at elecrat.com and they will dig into it immediately to help you resolve the problem. If you can use the KPA1500 utility to download the 1500's config file and attach it to that email that will also be helpful.? (They can walk you through that procedure if needed.) that file includes both the amps full configuration and its detailed fault log.) 73, Eric /elecraft.com/ On 4/29/2019 7:35 PM, Ed gilliland wrote: > My KPA1500 is faulting with a low gain alarm ration 6.? This is with 23 watts > input 160-10 meters.? Any advice? > > Thanks, Ed W5TM > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From w5tm001 at gmail.com Tue Apr 30 13:55:02 2019 From: w5tm001 at gmail.com (Ed gilliland) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 12:55:02 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 LOW GAIN FAULT In-Reply-To: <437B745F-D38F-41CA-B1F5-94B76D014CE6@gmail.com> References: <3906a3b1-a99f-e851-9047-5559819f66a9@gmail.com> <437B745F-D38F-41CA-B1F5-94B76D014CE6@gmail.com> Message-ID: <9d514f53-3c6b-b668-9e1c-fda48244475d@gmail.com> Hi Vic, thanks. That's the first thing I tried, should have included my checks in the first message.? Here is what I've done so far. Put a dummy load on the antenna 1 port Confirmed that the amp was on antenna port one Checked the SWR between the K3 and the amp 1.1 without the K3 tuner Re-seated all the cables on the KPA1500 rear panel Tried the amp again and it works.? I have no idea what cable fixed the problem.? I am using a back to back cable between the K3 and the KPA1500 AUX ports but it's been installed for months and I've experienced no problems.? We'll find out in tomorrow's CWT.? I think I'll run the amp at 900 watts until I gain confidence. WOW! WHAT A RELIEF! Ed On 4/30/2019 01:21, Vic Rosenthal wrote: > The first thing to do with any amplifier failure is to try it with a dummy load. If the problem still occurs, you can rule out SWR or RF feedback problems. It doesn?t seem like any of the above if it occurs on all bands, but it?s easy and a good start to a systematic diagnosis. > > Victor 4X6GP > >> On 30 Apr 2019, at 5:35, Ed gilliland wrote: >> >> My KPA1500 is faulting with a low gain alarm ration 6. This is with 23 watts input 160-10 meters. Any advice? >> >> Thanks, Ed W5TM >> >> ______________________________________________________________ >> Elecraft mailing list >> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft >> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm >> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net >> >> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net >> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From alan at wilcoxengineering.com Tue Apr 30 14:34:20 2019 From: alan at wilcoxengineering.com (Alan D. Wilcox) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:34:20 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 Tuneup, Rescue, Build; Service Legacy Message-ID: Hello, Does your K2 need repair? Tuneup? Want to sell it, but it needs some attention before offering it for sale? In addition to tuning your rig, I can also rescue a building project you might have started some time ago. See what my clients have said about my construction and service work at http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/6768 Photos of the popular "Twins" -- the KPA100 and KAT100 in EC2 enclosure -- are at https://wilcoxengineering.com/kpa100-in-ec2/ Cheers, Alan Alan D. Wilcox, W3DVX (K2-5373, K3-40) 570-916-9590 (cell, text) http://amazon.com/author/alandwilcox Williamsport, PA 17701 From donwilh at embarqmail.com Tue Apr 30 14:48:48 2019 From: donwilh at embarqmail.com (Don Wilhelm) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:48:48 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 VCO Alignment Issue In-Reply-To: References: <35dc40ba-9a64-8875-25f4-cb0e3e3c0be3@embarqmail.com> <9cf860ff-26eb-ae10-2aef-fa316a077bdb@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: <3983379e-0ee3-6044-d61a-23448464cdae@embarqmail.com> John, Where did the? TP1? frequency go after you removed a turn? It is possible that the VFO frequency is not getting back to U4 pin 4 -- the signal goes from U3 pin 6 thru C62 and then to U4. Did we verify that U6 pin 5 is near 4 volts?? What is the voltage at U4 pin 13? Sorry to go over things, but I just returned from a few days away and my memory is not yet focused. 73,, Don W3FPR On 4/28/2019 6:00 PM, John Wingard wrote: > Don, > > Finally got back to the K2 this afternoon. I have confirmed that T5 is > on the yellow core, with 16 turns through the center on the red and 4 > turns on the green. I mentioned earlier that I got all the toroids > from the Toroid Guy, so I felt confident that it was correctly wound. > I checked all the relay pins on K13, K14, and K15 and did not see any > solder bridges on any of them. Next, I pulled T5 and removed one turn > and re-installed. Unfortunately, nothing has changed. I'm still > getting that same 8.37 V at R30. Incidentally, I'm getting the 8.37 V > on either side of R30. Is that normal? I can also pull T5 and wind a > new one with the parts that came with the kit if you think that might > help, but something tells me that the problem lies elsewhere. I also > thought about pulling C72 and replacing it with another one, but > unfortunately there was only one of that value in the kit and I don't > have anything like it it my parts stash. Any new thoughts? > > de John, WB4GLJ > > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 6:00 PM Don Wilhelm > wrote: > > John, > > Both frequencies are too low. > You have either too much capacitance or too much inductance in the > VFO. > Count the number of times the red wire goes through the center of > the T5 > core - it should be 16. > > Check relays K13, K14 and K15 for solder bridges. > > Make sure the core of T5 is yellow. > You might have to try removing a turn from T5 if you can find no > other > cause - there have been a few K2s in the long past where the > permeability if the T5 core was higher than expected, and removing 1 > turn from T5 corrected things - I have not seen that recently, but > I do > mention it 'just in case'. > > If all else fails, you may have to "wind your way" through the relay > connections for the VFO Range Select area using the Relay Table on > the > Schematic Key page as your guide for the paths through the relays. > > 73, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/27/2019 5:37 PM, John Wingard wrote: > > Hi Don, > > > > Thanks for the quick response. I did check C72 again. It is a 271 > > value. I then spread the red turns on T5 as far as I could. I'd say > > they cover about 90+% of the toroid. I put the L30 slug at > mid-point > > of travel and measured voltage at R30 and it is still right at 8.37 > > V.? While there I checked the frequency at TP1 and it was 8247.90, > > which is considerably lower than the 8913 that you expected. > > > > Next I went up to 7100 and measured the voltage at R30. Still > right at > > 8.37 V, no change. Frequency at TP1?@ 7100 was 11558.11. > > > > So, it appears that the frequency at 4000 is not within the > expected > > range, and likely not at 7100 as well. Hope this tells you > something > > because I'm stumped. > > I've got some plans for this evening so I may not get back on it > until > > tomorrow afternoon, but if you've got any more things for me to > try I > > will do them then. > > > > John, WB4GLJ > > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 1:57 PM Don Wilhelm > > > >> > wrote: > > > >? ? ?John, > > > >? ? ?That high voltage is trying to reduce the capacity of the > varactors. > >? ? ?Which means there is either too much capacity or too much > >? ? ?inductance in > >? ? ?the circuit. > > > >? ? ?Check the value of C72 first - it should be marked "271". > Then set > >? ? ?the > >? ? ?L30 slug to about mid-position and spread the red turns of T5 > >? ? ?enough so > >? ? ?the starting and ending turns are adjacent.? What is the > voltage when > >? ? ?tuned to 4000 kHz?? Measure the frequency at TP1 - it should > be near > >? ? ?8913 kHz. > > > >? ? ?Then change to 40 meters - 7100 kHz - What is the R30 > voltage and > >? ? ?what > >? ? ?is the VFO frequency measured at TP1. > > > >? ? ?The answer to those questions will help in determining what > to do > >? ? ?next. > > > >? ? ?73, > >? ? ?Don W3FPR > > > >? ? ?On 4/27/2019 1:32 PM, John Wingard wrote: > >? ? ?> Working on my 2nd K2 (S/N 7869) and have run into a > problem with > >? ? ?the VCO > >? ? ?> alignment. I'm getting a constant 8.37 V at R30 at 4.000 MHz.. > >? ? ?I cannot > >? ? ?> change it with the full range of L30. Correct type inductor is > >? ? ?installed at > >? ? ?> L30.? Dropping the VFO down to 3.500 doesn't change it > either. I > >? ? ?have gone > >? ? ?> back through the archives and read just about every post > >? ? ?concerning this > >? ? ?> problem but nothing I have tried has made any difference. > I have > >? ? ?double > >? ? ?> checked all correct parts placements and orientations, > re-flowed all > >? ? ?> connections in the quadrant of the board around the VCO > section. > >? ? ?T5 is > >? ? ?> wound as per the manual (from the Toroid Guy) and installed > >? ? ?correctly. I > >? ? ?> have tried both spreading and compressing the turns on T5 with > >? ? ?no change > >? ? ?> either way. > >? ? ?> > >? ? ?> Regarding the thermistor board,? I have 4.18 V on pin 5 of U6. > >? ? ?> > >? ? ?> Test in the previous section were within specs: > >? ? ?> > >? ? ?> 4 MHz Oscillator Cal using CAL FCTR was 12099.61 and confirmed > >? ? ?with an > >? ? ?> external counter. > >? ? ?> Range of the PLL reference oscillator: 12099.61 - 12086.01 = > >? ? ?13.59 kHz > >? ? ?> VCO oscillator test: 8162.60 MHz > >? ? ?> > >? ? ?> I'm about out of ideas at this point. What should I start > >? ? ?checking next? > >? ? ?> > >? ? ?> Thanks for any help! > >? ? ?> > >? ? ?> 73 de John, WB4GLJ > >? ? ?> ______________________________________________________________ > >? ? ?> Elecraft mailing list > >? ? ?> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > >? ? ?> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > >? ? ?> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > >? ? ? > > >? ? ?> > >? ? ?> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > >? ? ?> Please help support this email list: > http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > >? ? ?> > > > From k2vco.vic at gmail.com Tue Apr 30 15:25:37 2019 From: k2vco.vic at gmail.com (Victor Rosenthal 4X6GP) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:25:37 +0300 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 LOW GAIN FAULT In-Reply-To: <9d514f53-3c6b-b668-9e1c-fda48244475d@gmail.com> References: <3906a3b1-a99f-e851-9047-5559819f66a9@gmail.com> <437B745F-D38F-41CA-B1F5-94B76D014CE6@gmail.com> <9d514f53-3c6b-b668-9e1c-fda48244475d@gmail.com> Message-ID: Great, there is nothing that is more fun than an intermittent problem! But there could have been dirt on one of the pins of the cables, and it may never happen again. Maybe Elecraft engineers can give you some hints. See you in the CWTs tomorrow! 73, Victor, 4X6GP Rehovot, Israel Formerly K2VCO CWops no. 5 http://www.qsl.net/k2vco/ On 30/04/2019 20:55, Ed gilliland wrote: > Hi Vic, thanks. > > That's the first thing I tried, should have included my checks in the > first message. Here is what I've done so far. > > Put a dummy load on the antenna 1 port > > Confirmed that the amp was on antenna port one > > Checked the SWR between the K3 and the amp 1.1 without the K3 tuner > > Re-seated all the cables on the KPA1500 rear panel > > Tried the amp again and it works. I have no idea what cable fixed > the problem. I am using a back to back cable between the K3 and the > KPA1500 AUX ports but it's been installed for months and I've > experienced no problems. We'll find out in tomorrow's CWT. I think > I'll run the amp at 900 watts until I gain confidence. > > WOW! WHAT A RELIEF! > > Ed > > > > On 4/30/2019 01:21, Vic Rosenthal wrote: >> The first thing to do with any amplifier failure is to try it with >> a dummy load. If the problem still occurs, you can rule out SWR or >> RF feedback problems. It doesn?t seem like any of the above if it >> occurs on all bands, but it?s easy and a good start to a systematic >> diagnosis. >> >> Victor 4X6GP >> >>> On 30 Apr 2019, at 5:35, Ed gilliland wrote: >>> >>> My KPA1500 is faulting with a low gain alarm ration 6. This is >>> with 23 watts input 160-10 meters. Any advice? >>> >>> Thanks, Ed W5TM From jwin1048 at gmail.com Tue Apr 30 15:49:07 2019 From: jwin1048 at gmail.com (John Wingard) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 15:49:07 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] K2 VCO Alignment Issue In-Reply-To: <3983379e-0ee3-6044-d61a-23448464cdae@embarqmail.com> References: <35dc40ba-9a64-8875-25f4-cb0e3e3c0be3@embarqmail.com> <9cf860ff-26eb-ae10-2aef-fa316a077bdb@embarqmail.com> <3983379e-0ee3-6044-d61a-23448464cdae@embarqmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Don, No problem on the delay. OK, after removing 1 turn from T5, the freq. at TP1 (at 4000) is now 8535.14, so it did come up from the previous value, but clearly not enough. I have 4.19 V on pin 5 of U6 and I have 4.21 V on pin 13 of U4. I wasn't sure of your schedule so I also put in a support request to Elecraft but have not received a reply as of yet. Hopefully between your help and their help I can get this resolved. 73 de John, WB4GLJ On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 2:48 PM Don Wilhelm wrote: > John, > > Where did the TP1 frequency go after you removed a turn? > > It is possible that the VFO frequency is not getting back to U4 pin 4 -- > the signal goes from U3 pin 6 thru C62 and then to U4. > > Did we verify that U6 pin 5 is near 4 volts? What is the voltage at U4 > pin 13? > > Sorry to go over things, but I just returned from a few days away and my > memory is not yet focused. > > 73,, > Don W3FPR > > On 4/28/2019 6:00 PM, John Wingard wrote: > > Don, > > > > Finally got back to the K2 this afternoon. I have confirmed that T5 is > > on the yellow core, with 16 turns through the center on the red and 4 > > turns on the green. I mentioned earlier that I got all the toroids > > from the Toroid Guy, so I felt confident that it was correctly wound. > > I checked all the relay pins on K13, K14, and K15 and did not see any > > solder bridges on any of them. Next, I pulled T5 and removed one turn > > and re-installed. Unfortunately, nothing has changed. I'm still > > getting that same 8.37 V at R30. Incidentally, I'm getting the 8.37 V > > on either side of R30. Is that normal? I can also pull T5 and wind a > > new one with the parts that came with the kit if you think that might > > help, but something tells me that the problem lies elsewhere. I also > > thought about pulling C72 and replacing it with another one, but > > unfortunately there was only one of that value in the kit and I don't > > have anything like it it my parts stash. Any new thoughts? > > > > de John, WB4GLJ > > > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 6:00 PM Don Wilhelm > > wrote: > > > > John, > > > > Both frequencies are too low. > > You have either too much capacitance or too much inductance in the > > VFO. > > Count the number of times the red wire goes through the center of > > the T5 > > core - it should be 16. > > > > Check relays K13, K14 and K15 for solder bridges. > > > > Make sure the core of T5 is yellow. > > You might have to try removing a turn from T5 if you can find no > > other > > cause - there have been a few K2s in the long past where the > > permeability if the T5 core was higher than expected, and removing 1 > > turn from T5 corrected things - I have not seen that recently, but > > I do > > mention it 'just in case'. > > > > If all else fails, you may have to "wind your way" through the relay > > connections for the VFO Range Select area using the Relay Table on > > the > > Schematic Key page as your guide for the paths through the relays. > > > > 73, > > Don W3FPR > > > > On 4/27/2019 5:37 PM, John Wingard wrote: > > > Hi Don, > > > > > > Thanks for the quick response. I did check C72 again. It is a 271 > > > value. I then spread the red turns on T5 as far as I could. I'd say > > > they cover about 90+% of the toroid. I put the L30 slug at > > mid-point > > > of travel and measured voltage at R30 and it is still right at 8.37 > > > V. While there I checked the frequency at TP1 and it was 8247.90, > > > which is considerably lower than the 8913 that you expected. > > > > > > Next I went up to 7100 and measured the voltage at R30. Still > > right at > > > 8.37 V, no change. Frequency at TP1 @ 7100 was 11558.11. > > > > > > So, it appears that the frequency at 4000 is not within the > > expected > > > range, and likely not at 7100 as well. Hope this tells you > > something > > > because I'm stumped. > > > I've got some plans for this evening so I may not get back on it > > until > > > tomorrow afternoon, but if you've got any more things for me to > > try I > > > will do them then. > > > > > > John, WB4GLJ > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2019 at 1:57 PM Don Wilhelm > > > > > >> > > wrote: > > > > > > John, > > > > > > That high voltage is trying to reduce the capacity of the > > varactors. > > > Which means there is either too much capacity or too much > > > inductance in > > > the circuit. > > > > > > Check the value of C72 first - it should be marked "271". > > Then set > > > the > > > L30 slug to about mid-position and spread the red turns of T5 > > > enough so > > > the starting and ending turns are adjacent. What is the > > voltage when > > > tuned to 4000 kHz? Measure the frequency at TP1 - it should > > be near > > > 8913 kHz. > > > > > > Then change to 40 meters - 7100 kHz - What is the R30 > > voltage and > > > what > > > is the VFO frequency measured at TP1. > > > > > > The answer to those questions will help in determining what > > to do > > > next. > > > > > > 73, > > > Don W3FPR > > > > > > On 4/27/2019 1:32 PM, John Wingard wrote: > > > > Working on my 2nd K2 (S/N 7869) and have run into a > > problem with > > > the VCO > > > > alignment. I'm getting a constant 8.37 V at R30 at 4.000 > MHz.. > > > I cannot > > > > change it with the full range of L30. Correct type inductor > is > > > installed at > > > > L30. Dropping the VFO down to 3.500 doesn't change it > > either. I > > > have gone > > > > back through the archives and read just about every post > > > concerning this > > > > problem but nothing I have tried has made any difference. > > I have > > > double > > > > checked all correct parts placements and orientations, > > re-flowed all > > > > connections in the quadrant of the board around the VCO > > section. > > > T5 is > > > > wound as per the manual (from the Toroid Guy) and installed > > > correctly. I > > > > have tried both spreading and compressing the turns on T5 > with > > > no change > > > > either way. > > > > > > > > Regarding the thermistor board, I have 4.18 V on pin 5 of > U6. > > > > > > > > Test in the previous section were within specs: > > > > > > > > 4 MHz Oscillator Cal using CAL FCTR was 12099.61 and > confirmed > > > with an > > > > external counter. > > > > Range of the PLL reference oscillator: 12099.61 - 12086.01 = > > > 13.59 kHz > > > > VCO oscillator test: 8162.60 MHz > > > > > > > > I'm about out of ideas at this point. What should I start > > > checking next? > > > > > > > > Thanks for any help! > > > > > > > > 73 de John, WB4GLJ > > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > > > > Elecraft mailing list > > > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > > > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > > > > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > > > > Please help support this email list: > > http://www.qsl.net/donate.html > > > > > > > > > > > From wm5dx at yahoo.com Tue Apr 30 15:52:33 2019 From: wm5dx at yahoo.com (Mike Streeter) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 19:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Subject: [Elecraft] Fw: KPA 500 HV Problem. In-Reply-To: <1832470418.2940795.1556653812842@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1832470418.2940795.1556653812842.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1832470418.2940795.1556653812842@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <931749743.2948576.1556653953199@mail.yahoo.com> ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Mike Streeter To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Sent: ?Tuesday?, ?April? ?30?, ?2019? ?02?:?50?:?12? ?PM? ?CDTSubject: KPA 500 HV Problem. My KPA 500 has been running ok for several years on 120 Volts. Today I turned it off on the back , unplugged it and opened the top because I thought I might need to change the voltage tap. I did not need to change it. I replaced the top cover, plugged it in and turned it on at the back. All ok, but when I turned it on with the front panel button the HV reads .1 in standby. If I tap OPER it shows a hard fault and "270V error" .The Manual says this is a 270V supply failure and to recycle the mains power KPA 500 after it is corrected. I tried recycling the power but still faults. I don't have any 270V power from the mains, if I did it would be 240ish, not 270. The fuse block on the back is set to 115V.Any advice would be welcome.Mike, WM5DX. ? From a.durbin at msn.com Tue Apr 30 16:09:09 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 20:09:09 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA 500 HV Problem Message-ID: The 270 V fault refers to the voltage that is used to bias the pin diodes in the T/R switch. That voltage is derived from the same transformer tap as produces the nominal 60 V supply. When I built my KPA500 kit I measured the voltage and found it was much lower than 270. Customer support told me that was normal and I have never seen a 270 volt fault. I'd have no problem removing the top cover and holding the micro switch closed while I measured the actual voltage on the 270 V connector. I can't suggest that you do that. Perhaps a careful visual inspection of everything you touched when you had the cover off? 73, Andy, k3wyc From c-hawley at illinois.edu Tue Apr 30 16:11:38 2019 From: c-hawley at illinois.edu (hawley, charles j jr) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 20:11:38 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Fw: KPA 500 HV Problem. In-Reply-To: <931749743.2948576.1556653953199@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1832470418.2940795.1556653812842.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1832470418.2940795.1556653812842@mail.yahoo.com>, <931749743.2948576.1556653953199@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: The pin diode bias supply is 270dc. That is what is failing. Has nothing to do with your mains. Generally you should look at the last thing(s) you did before it failed. That is where you opened it up and did something. How did you determine that the HV was ok as is? Unplug anything...inadvertently...? Take a look where you were inside. Something with the interlock micro switch? Chuck Hawley c-hawley at illinois.edu Amateur Radio, KE9UW ________________________________ From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of Mike Streeter via Elecraft Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:52 PM To: Elecraft Reflector Subject: [Elecraft] Fw: KPA 500 HV Problem. ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Mike Streeter To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Sent: ?Tuesday?, ?April? ?30?, ?2019? ?02?:?50?:?12? ?PM? ?CDTSubject: KPA 500 HV Problem. My KPA 500 has been running ok for several years on 120 Volts. Today I turned it off on the back , unplugged it and opened the top because I thought I might need to change the voltage tap. I did not need to change it. I replaced the top cover, plugged it in and turned it on at the back. All ok, but when I turned it on with the front panel button the HV reads .1 in standby. If I tap OPER it shows a hard fault and "270V error" .The Manual says this is a 270V supply failure and to recycle the mains power KPA 500 after it is corrected. I tried recycling the power but still faults. I don't have any 270V power from the mains, if I did it would be 240ish, not 270. The fuse block on the back is set to 115V.Any advice would be welcome.Mike, WM5DX. ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From a.durbin at msn.com Tue Apr 30 16:13:13 2019 From: a.durbin at msn.com (Andy Durbin) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 20:13:13 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA 500 HV Problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: BTW - the top cover safety interlock switch controls 60 V and 270 V supplies. Is it adjusted properly so the top cover closes it? 73, Andy k3wyc From madelyn at elecraft.com Tue Apr 30 16:19:47 2019 From: madelyn at elecraft.com (Madelyn Gomez) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:19:47 -0700 Subject: [Elecraft] Volunteer needed / Ham-Com Texas Message-ID: Hello Elecraft enthusiasts. We will have a booth June 7 & 8 in Plano, Texas for Ham-Com 2019. If anyone has a bit of time to volunteer and knowledge of the KX-Line - I would love to hear from you! Please contact me directly at madelyn at elecraft.com. Thank you! Madelyn Gomez Elecraft Sales 125 Westridge Drive, Watsonville, CA. 831-763-4211 From rmcgraw at blomand.net Tue Apr 30 17:12:33 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 16:12:33 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 LOW GAIN FAULT In-Reply-To: References: <3906a3b1-a99f-e851-9047-5559819f66a9@gmail.com> <437B745F-D38F-41CA-B1F5-94B76D014CE6@gmail.com> <9d514f53-3c6b-b668-9e1c-fda48244475d@gmail.com> Message-ID: I've found that? hams are notorious for plugging in a multi pin connector and not securing the connector to be tight with the provided thumb screws. ? The "I'll do it later, but I've got to get it on the air now" seems to always take precedence . ? ? The connectors will wiggle and back out, often leaving an intermittent connection. Likewise with PL-259 connectors.? Finger tight is simply not good enough for a reliable RF connection.? I use a pair of 4" Channel lock pliers to snug the PL-259 connectors.?? And I solved many RFI issues for others just by tightening the PL-259's in the path. 73 Bob, K4TAX From rmcgraw at blomand.net Tue Apr 30 17:17:23 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 16:17:23 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] Fw: KPA 500 HV Problem. In-Reply-To: <931749743.2948576.1556653953199@mail.yahoo.com> References: <1832470418.2940795.1556653812842.ref@mail.yahoo.com> <1832470418.2940795.1556653812842@mail.yahoo.com> <931749743.2948576.1556653953199@mail.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <79da0868-6174-d406-a8ac-2171f7063ff2@blomand.net> That 270 volts you refer to is the? "270 VDC" from the power supply.?? Check to see the covers are on tight and aligned correctly such that the safety interlock is engaged as it should be.?? Make sure a wire is not holding the cover off and thus not seating correctly. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/30/2019 2:52 PM, Mike Streeter via Elecraft wrote: > > > ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Mike Streeter To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Sent: ?Tuesday?, ?April? ?30?, ?2019? ?02?:?50?:?12? ?PM? ?CDTSubject: KPA 500 HV Problem. > My KPA 500 has been running ok for several years on 120 Volts. Today I turned it off on the back , unplugged it and opened the top because I thought I might need to change the voltage tap. I did not need to change it. I replaced the top cover, plugged it in and turned it on at the back. All ok, but when I turned it on with the front panel button the HV reads .1 in standby. If I tap OPER it shows a hard fault and "270V error" .The Manual says this is a 270V supply failure and to recycle the mains power KPA 500 after it is corrected. I tried recycling the power but still faults. I don't have any 270V power from the mains, if I did it would be 240ish, not 270. The fuse block on the back is set to 115V.Any advice would be welcome.Mike, WM5DX. > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From k9yeq at live.com Tue Apr 30 17:31:21 2019 From: k9yeq at live.com (Bill Johnson) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 21:31:21 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] K3 - DVR installation question In-Reply-To: References: <7eab21ca-532d-65dd-dcf2-bd6da26bd775@nycap.rr.com> <4427db0b-5ea7-553d-04e8-47847a3e858e@nycap.rr.com> <1556632692275-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: Great idea to use on a freq with a schedule. I will give that a try! 73, Bill K9YEQ https://wrj-tech.com/ -----Original Message----- From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net On Behalf Of Dick Dievendorff Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 9:17 AM To: K8TE Cc: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: Re: [Elecraft] K3 - DVR installation question Bill: I use mine in DX pileups, as I tend to get enthusiastic and holler my call, which could become tedious to my wife. M1 has my call, M2 has ?thanks, you?re also 59?. CW memories for M1 and M2 have similar function. I tend to use M1 less often and M2 sooner since the arrival of my KPA1500. Good to meet you in Visalia! 73 de Dick, K6KR > On Apr 30, 2019, at 13:58, K8TE wrote: > > In addition to contesting, I use it to call friends for a pre-setup sked. > They often don't show-up on-time or can't make it. I quit after five > minutes with no response. > > During FD several years ago, I took over the 40m station after a > nearby lightning strike took out the primary K3. The back-up had no > DVR. That was the longest four hours of the event (not a contest)! > > I have also used the DVR for Special Event Station operations when the > rates slow down. I wouldn't be without a DVR in my K3's! > > ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From RichLentz at cox.net Tue Apr 30 17:41:01 2019 From: RichLentz at cox.net (Rich) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 14:41:01 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] Appears that VFO is not tracking in diversity. Message-ID: <1556660461015-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Have read the manual and the various postings here and can not find problem. When I turn on Diversity the B VFO does not track, and stays at the same freq. Know it was working 6 months ago. Is there an obvious setting that could not be correct? KC dot is flashing, Diversity ON comes up and then DIVERSITY flashes (sometimes). Arrow is pointing at A and SUB is on in display. Both receivers are working as determined by adjusting RF and AF Separately. Can tell it is in diversity while listening to a QSO as one seems louder in one ear and vs/vs. Any help appreciated. -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ From k6mr at outlook.com Tue Apr 30 18:02:55 2019 From: k6mr at outlook.com (Ken K6MR) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 22:02:55 +0000 Subject: [Elecraft] Appears that VFO is not tracking in diversity. In-Reply-To: <1556660461015-0.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1556660461015-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Message-ID: The B VFO doesn?t do anything in diversity receive. Both receivers are driven by the A synth. B VFO is only used for a split transmit frequency if you want. You are thinking of the VFO LINK mode where B follows A with a given split. Ken K6MR ________________________________ From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net on behalf of Rich Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 2:41:01 PM To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net Subject: [Elecraft] Appears that VFO is not tracking in diversity. Have read the manual and the various postings here and can not find problem. When I turn on Diversity the B VFO does not track, and stays at the same freq. Know it was working 6 months ago. Is there an obvious setting that could not be correct? KC dot is flashing, Diversity ON comes up and then DIVERSITY flashes (sometimes). Arrow is pointing at A and SUB is on in display. Both receivers are working as determined by adjusting RF and AF Separately. Can tell it is in diversity while listening to a QSO as one seems louder in one ear and vs/vs. Any help appreciated. -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/ ______________________________________________________________ Elecraft mailing list Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html From ardrhi at gmail.com Tue Apr 30 18:54:12 2019 From: ardrhi at gmail.com (Gwen Patton) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:54:12 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 LOW GAIN FAULT In-Reply-To: References: <3906a3b1-a99f-e851-9047-5559819f66a9@gmail.com> <437B745F-D38F-41CA-B1F5-94B76D014CE6@gmail.com> <9d514f53-3c6b-b668-9e1c-fda48244475d@gmail.com> Message-ID: I started using a corrosion-inhibiting lube on my PL-259s, and religiously sealing them with Coax-Seal. I tighten them very tightly as well. Since I started doing that, I have no odd failures or intermittent connections in my feedlines. 73, Gwen, NG3P On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 5:13 PM Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > I've found that hams are notorious for plugging in a multi pin > connector and not securing the connector to be tight with the provided > thumb screws. The "I'll do it later, but I've got to get it on the air > now" seems to always take precedence . The connectors will wiggle > and back out, often leaving an intermittent connection. > > Likewise with PL-259 connectors. Finger tight is simply not good enough > for a reliable RF connection. I use a pair of 4" Channel lock pliers to > snug the PL-259 connectors. And I solved many RFI issues for others > just by tightening the PL-259's in the path. > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- -+-+-+-+- Jenny Everywhere's Infinite: Quark Time http://quarktime.net From rmcgraw at blomand.net Tue Apr 30 19:17:37 2019 From: rmcgraw at blomand.net (Bob McGraw K4TAX) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:17:37 -0500 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 LOW GAIN FAULT In-Reply-To: References: <3906a3b1-a99f-e851-9047-5559819f66a9@gmail.com> <437B745F-D38F-41CA-B1F5-94B76D014CE6@gmail.com> <9d514f53-3c6b-b668-9e1c-fda48244475d@gmail.com> Message-ID: <020ae421-65a9-9b57-35b2-37e435e7c6b6@blomand.net> A good approach for those PL-259 connectors outside or exposed to the weather.?? For those inside, that's a might bit aggressive. I just prefer to snug them tight, a bit more than hand tight, using some small channel lock pliers. 73 Bob, K4TAX On 4/30/2019 5:54 PM, Gwen Patton wrote: > I started using a corrosion-inhibiting lube on my PL-259s, and religiously > sealing them with Coax-Seal. I tighten them very tightly as well. Since I > started doing that, I have no odd failures or intermittent connections in > my feedlines. > > 73, > Gwen, NG3P > From ardrhi at gmail.com Tue Apr 30 19:35:00 2019 From: ardrhi at gmail.com (Gwen Patton) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 19:35:00 -0400 Subject: [Elecraft] KPA1500 LOW GAIN FAULT In-Reply-To: <020ae421-65a9-9b57-35b2-37e435e7c6b6@blomand.net> References: <3906a3b1-a99f-e851-9047-5559819f66a9@gmail.com> <437B745F-D38F-41CA-B1F5-94B76D014CE6@gmail.com> <9d514f53-3c6b-b668-9e1c-fda48244475d@gmail.com> <020ae421-65a9-9b57-35b2-37e435e7c6b6@blomand.net> Message-ID: I don't know if you're talking about what I do, Bob, but I guess I should have said that I do that with the outdoor connectors, where they might encounter weather. Indoor connectors are just snugged down tight enough that they don't wiggle loose, since I disconnect them whenever lightning is in the area. Gwen, NG3P On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 7:18 PM Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote: > A good approach for those PL-259 connectors outside or exposed to the > weather. For those inside, that's a might bit aggressive. I just > prefer to snug them tight, a bit more than hand tight, using some small > channel lock pliers. > > 73 > > Bob, K4TAX > > On 4/30/2019 5:54 PM, Gwen Patton wrote: > > I started using a corrosion-inhibiting lube on my PL-259s, and > religiously > > sealing them with Coax-Seal. I tighten them very tightly as well. Since I > > started doing that, I have no odd failures or intermittent connections in > > my feedlines. > > > > 73, > > Gwen, NG3P > > > > ______________________________________________________________ > Elecraft mailing list > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm > Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html -- -+-+-+-+- Jenny Everywhere's Infinite: Quark Time http://quarktime.net From lladerman at earthlink.net Tue Apr 30 21:09:50 2019 From: lladerman at earthlink.net (W0FK) Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 18:09:50 -0700 (MST) Subject: [Elecraft] FS: KX2 Package Message-ID: <1556672990176-0.post@n2.nabble.com> Selling the following KX2 package: KX2-F Transceiver KXAT2-F KX2 ATU KXBT2 Internal Battery pack KXBC2 Battery Charger KXIO2 Real Time Clock and General Purpose outputs Lowepro CS60 Case KX2ACBL Accessory Cable KXUSB 12v power cord with Anderson Powerpoles Pro Audio Engineering Kx22 Heat sink (with integrated harmonic level reduction update) and SidekKX panels. Original side panels included. Printed bound manual, factory box. The added heat sink allows increased power output for long periods of FT8. $1049 shipped 48 States (AK and HI will have additional charges due to distances; sorry, no International sales), PayPal fee included, Zelle and personal checks accepted. Please contact me at lladerman AT earthlink DOT net. NOTE, I have a SPAM filter which will generate an automatic reply for you to fill out a form. If I catch it, I'll add your email. Sorry for the inconvenience. Some hate it to the point they won't communicate with me, others (myself included) could care less about it. I get hundreds of SPAM emails, and this is how I deal with it. 73, Lou, W0FK ----- St. Louis, MO "The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein -- Sent from: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/