[Elecraft] loss of RX sensitivity
Dave B
g8kbvdave at googlemail.com
Wed Sep 19 04:16:08 EDT 2018
Wunder, I'll second you on that!
Of all the 1000's of RF connectors I've assembled and used over the
years for my own hobby and at work. The venerable "UHF" series have
always proved to be the nastiest most unreliable types ever. Period.
All my own personal radio kit, either get's them replaced (Sadly, not
always an easy job) with a N or BNC (in one case, a TNC.) Or a BNC (or
N) adapter is securely fitted as a permanent fixture (including LocTite
on the threads, in mobile/portable situations!)
I also use BNC's at HF, as we do at work. They can happily carry well
over 150W at up to 220MHz even in the presence of some very bad VSWR's
(6:1 or higher.) Assemble them correctly and look after them
physically, and they will last a lifetime.
The UHF series are just plain unreliable. It is no surprise that the
military (NATO) don't use them any more.
73.
Dave G0WBX (also G8KBV)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
On 18/09/18 19:45, elecraft-request at mailman.qth.net wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2018 16:45:10 -0700
> From: Walter Underwood <wunder at wunderwood.org>
> To: "elecraft at mailman.qth.net" <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] loss of RX sensitivity
> Message-ID: <CEF1DF11-28D1-4409-8023-4C4CA0C81B4A at wunderwood.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> The next time someone challenges me on why I only use BNC and Type N connectors, I?m going to send them this entire discussion.
>
> wunder
> K6WRU
> Walter Underwood
> CM87wj
> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
--
Created on and sent from a Unix like PC running and using free and open source software.
::
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list