[Elecraft] 1.8 kHz SSB Filter

[Jim Low man]

Maybe I missed it, but there once was a link on the Elecraft website with filter recommendations.

73 de Jim-AD6CW 

> On Mar 9, 2018, at 4:11 AM, Kjeld Holm <kh at kh-translation.dk> wrote:
> 
> Agree
> And just want to tell you that I am using Filter width=1500 and Filter=750. 
> Vy 73 de OZ1CCM 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bill Johnson
> Sent: 9. marts 2018 02:36
> To: Elecraft List
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 1.8 kHz SSB Filter
> 
> Yes!
> 
> 73,
> Bill
> K9YEQ
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net <elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net> On Behalf Of Bob McGraw K4TAX
> Sent: Thursday, March 8, 2018 7:22 PM
> To: Elecraft List <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 1.8 kHz SSB Filter
> 
> I definitely agree regarding having a 1.8 kHz filter for SSB is a positive attribute.   In fact both of my radios have 1.8 kHz filters. And by reducing the DSP BW to 1.8 kHz and shifting the PBT, one would be amazed at how well a SSB signal really sounds. Certainly worth the investment in my experience.
> 
> 73
> 
> Bob, K4TAX
> 
> 
>> On 3/8/2018 4:38 PM, elecraft-request at mailman.qth.net wrote:
>> Message: 1
>> Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2018 11:57:32 -0500
>> From: Craig Buck<radiok4ia at gmail.com>
>> To: Chuck Chandler<chandlerusm at gmail.com> Cc:elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Planning the next filters
>> Message-ID:
>>    <CAAq9XABK9iGCPBVMb8OGnzXNmJ0H1k2X87f1dX1fJsCZK_PT9w at mail.gmail.com>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>> 
>> Get the 1.8 if you work ssb.  Experiment with shifting the pass band 
>> for maximum clarity.  Youll be amazed just how narrow it can get and 
>> still be understandable.
>> 
>>> On Mar 8, 2018 11:24 AM, "Chuck Chandler"<chandlerusm at gmail.com>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Right now I have the stock SSB and a 400 Hz filter in both main and 
>>> sub rcvrs.  I would like to add some a few at a time.  My first 
>>> priority is to add a couple to the main receiver, since it is the 
>>> biggest chore to get to.
>>> 
>>> I plan on a 250 Hz CW filter, but am going back and forth between the
>>> 2.1 and 1.8 kHz filters.  I know that narrowing the DSP to 1.8 gives 
>>> a really difficult to understand voice signal, while the 2.1 allows 
>>> in more adjacent signals.  However, the roofing filters may not behave in the same manner.
>>> For example, the 1.8 could be set to turn on at 2.1 to take advantage 
>>> of skirt shape.
>>> 
>>> I primarily DX, and operate in some contests as well.  I know SSB 
>>> contests really need a narrow SSB filter.
>>> 
>>> Any suggestions on the matter from those who have gone this route before?
>>> 
>>> 73 de Chuck, WS1L
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to k9yeq at live.com ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message delivered to kh at kh-translation.dk
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to jmlowman at sbcglobal.net