[Elecraft] Planning the next filters
David Bunte
dpbunte at gmail.com
Thu Mar 8 11:45:24 EST 2018
Chuck -
You will likely get a wide variety of responses, and here is mine. I added
the 400 Hz filter to my main and sub receiver. I work CW almost
exclusively. I rag chew and chase some DX. I barely “dabble” in contests. I
can’t recall a single time when I thought a narrower CW filter would have
made a difference for me. It may help that my antenna is quite modest, and
I don’t have other hames near enough to impede my reception.
Best of luck as you proce d.
Dave - K9FN
On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 11:24 AM Chuck Chandler <chandlerusm at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Right now I have the stock SSB and a 400 Hz filter in both main and sub
> rcvrs. I would like to add some a few at a time. My first priority is to
> add a couple to the main receiver, since it is the biggest chore to get
> to.
>
> I plan on a 250 Hz CW filter, but am going back and forth between the 2.1
> and 1.8 kHz filters. I know that narrowing the DSP to 1.8 gives a really
> difficult to understand voice signal, while the 2.1 allows in more adjacent
> signals. However, the roofing filters may not behave in the same manner.
> For example, the 1.8 could be set to turn on at 2.1 to take advantage of
> skirt shape.
>
> I primarily DX, and operate in some contests as well. I know SSB contests
> really need a narrow SSB filter.
>
> Any suggestions on the matter from those who have gone this route before?
>
> 73 de Chuck, WS1L
>
> --
>
>
> ===================
> Chuck Chandler
> chandlerusm at gmail.com
> ===================
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to dpbunte at gmail.com
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list