[Elecraft] OT: 6M proceedure
Wes Stewart
wes_n7ws at triconet.org
Sat Jun 2 18:14:20 EDT 2018
Interesting conversation. As one those old farts, age 76 and a ham for 60 of
them, I do still have all of my teeth, most of my hair and a 59-year-old
fiancee. I guess I fail to understand the heartburn about calling frequencies.
First, they aren't FCC assigned frequencies. It is completely legal to operate
on them on a first-come-first-served basis. No one owns a frequency. Now while
it might be reasonably argued that it is bad form to occupy one continuously, it
certainly isn't the end of the world. Regularly scheduled "nets" should
certainly use a different frequency but if someone calls CQ and is answered by a
distant station I fail to see a need to immediately QSY and risk losing the QSO,
especially if it is MS.
Wes N7WS
On 6/2/2018 12:51 PM, Bob McGraw K4TAX wrote:
> Absolutely correct! These old farts, gum beaters and false teeth clackers,
> are usually running 100 watts or so to outside non-directional antennas and
> are often no more than 20 miles apart. If challenged one will be told that
> "we were hear first and you should move on". They do not recognize the
> national calling frequency by gentleman's agreement. Seems like hours and
> hours of QSO's takes place as "members" of the group come in and out during
> the evenings.
>
> I've often heard stations in the distant calling CQ and I've answered them on
> the calling frequency and asked the distant station to QSY up or down 5. Then
> I hear about me QRM'm their QSO. Crap such as this is one reason I stopped
> contesting on VHF.
>
> 73
>
> Bob, K4TAX
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list