[Elecraft] The KX2

[Wayne Burdick]

Hi Dave,


> I think it is intriguing that Elecraft chose to make it's new rig a "downsized" version of the KX3.  I can certainly see how this has stimulated a lot of interest.  What I'm trying to figure out is whether or not it does anything better than the KX3, or is it just a smaller, and less capable, radio.  At this point, I'm inclined to think the latter. 

The KX2, given its size/weight, can go places no other 9-band/mutli-mode HF transceiver can go. This makes it "more capable" in a sense. It has fewer controls, but they're the ones you generally need for ultra portable operation. 

It has a number of features that make it ideal for HT-style (or horizontally deployed/hand-held) operation:

  - built-in mic
  - battery shifted to the left (bottom, when hand-held)
  - heat sink on the right (top, when hand-held)
  - XMIT switch easily accessible for use as PTT
  - attached paddle length reduced, easily accessible during HT use
  - amp-hours metering for better tracking battery life
  - quick-disconnet jack for trailing counterpoise wire


> I can only guess at the decreased capability of the optional ATU.  The one for the KX2 may still be sufficient for most needs, but I just hate to see less capability.  

See previous post. There is one less L and C, and those were primarily for better coverage of 160 meters.


> I was disappointed to see that the PX3 would not mate with the KX2.... that capability is more appropriate for a larger rig ... just not enough room in that smaller package ... maybe it was to just hold the cost down???

All of the above.

The feature set was carefully targeted to keep the cost lower, making it a good first HF rig for new operators.

> 

> So, how do you describe the difference in ten words or less? 

See previous email :)

73,
Wayne
N6KR