[Elecraft] QSLs
Jorge Diez CX6VM
cx6vm.jorge at gmail.com
Mon Jul 25 21:54:17 EDT 2016
That's sounds very good
But LOTW don't know about propagation and confirm any match, also when one side of the QSO was during his noon time
73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W
Enviado desde mi iPhone
> El 25 jul. 2016, a las 18:56, Jim Brown <jim at audiosystemsgroup.com> escribió:
>
>> On Mon,7/25/2016 2:42 PM, Wes Stewart wrote:
>> It's almost as bad in the states if you have 160-meter cards. For the life of me I can't understand why any card checker can't do 160 QSLs.
>
> The requirement is that a card checker must have achieved 160M DXCC him/herself before they can check 160M cards. The reason is pretty simple -- some operators were cheating by doctoring cards -- for example, by changing 18.1 MHz to 1.8 MHz. The logic is that a card checker should know enough about 160M propagation (and perhaps even activity) to know whether a QSL might be invalid because it occurs at a time when the band could not possibly have been open between the two stations (for example, no common darkness over a realistic path, taking greyline into account).
>
> Sorry, but some folks aren't ethical. :)
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to cx6vm.jorge at gmail.com
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list