[Elecraft] Why buy a KX2/KX3 compared to a KX1/MTR3B in a QRP portable scenario?
Chip Stratton
lightdazzled at gmail.com
Thu Jul 7 08:19:42 EDT 2016
I have a KX3 and a KX1. I still use the KX1 sometimes for SOTA portable
even when weight is not a big consideration, simply because I enjoy using a
simpler rig. Still make plenty of QSO's and it is just a bit more
challenging and gratifying since it is a more primitive rig.
Really the KX3 offers much improved ease of use. Better built-in ATU, which
can make a difference when moving to different bands and using random wire
type antennas. NIce VFO. Informative display. etc. etc.
Use what you you enjoy using!
Chip
AE5KA
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Mark Lunday <wd4elg at triad.rr.com> wrote:
> I want to ask some questions to help me understand the thinking behind the
> KX2 (and the KX3) because I am not fully understanding some things. I am a
> current owner of an LNR MTR3B. 39 years in the hobby, but new to TRUE QRP.
> Did I make a sub-optimal decision with the MTR3B? (Yes, I WANT a KX2. I
> have drooled over the KX3 since it was first produced. And I used a
> friend's K2, so I am a fan, but did I make the BEST choice?)
>
> I see three use cases for the small QRP rig in this category:
> * QRO home station, with an amplifier.
> * QRP home station.
> * QRP portable station (NOT FIELD DAY). This is where I get
> confused.
> Why would someone purchase all those features in KX2/KX3?
>
> I have the following REQUIREMENTS:
> * Minimize the weight
> * Simplify the operation
> * Maximize the operating time
> * Use efficient and easy-to-install antennas
> * Maximize the possibility of a QSO, any QSO
>
> I have the following OBJECTIVES:
> * Have fun
> * Improve my QRP skill
> * Learn about station optimization
> * See how far I can work
> * See if I can get a few DX and as many states as possible
> * Enrich my time outdoors by including my lifelong hobby of ham radio
>
> Again, why buy a KX2 or KX3? Let's take PRICE out of the equation for this
> thread. That's not a good metric for me in this QRP portable use case
> analysis, because my SELECTION of FEATURES that fulfill the requirements
> will dictate what I need to pay in order to MEET those requirements. (The
> XYL sees it differently, but if the KX2 or KX3 meets the requirements best,
> then that is what I want to purchase.) And let us call the weight, size
> and
> battery consumption as even factors, none wins over the other for this
> argument. So here goes the analysis:
>
> * Why do I need all those bands with the KX2/KX3? I am not going to
> erect an 80 meter end fed (too long) or a compromise 80 meter antenna for
> QRP ops in the park, as that won't maximize my objectives. 40/30/20 should
> do it. Anything higher than 20 will, in the coming sunspot lull (already
> here?) render QRP operations quite difficult (not impossible, but a huge
> investment of time for little return). Notwithstanding sporadic E, I don't
> understand why those other bands would be of benefit now for QRP Portable
> operation.
>
> * Why do I need all those filters and awesome DSP capabilities with
> the KX2/KX3? I plan to use CW only to maximize QSO possibility.and I am
> going to only call the strongest stations that my rig will hear. Why would
> I need to filter so I can hear weak signals that I won't be calling anyway?
> And I don't see the benefit of chasing DX in a pileup, using an offset,
> when
> I am QRP on an end-fed wire on a picnic bench in a park.
>
> * Why do I need SSB with the KX2/KX3? See previous bullet item
> regarding CW only.
>
> * Who do I need digital modes with the KX2/KX3? (In fact, why does
> Elecraft provide the two digital modes most susceptible to QSB, fading and
> interference? (How many RTTY QRP operators do I know? None. The
> old-timers I work on HF are all running high power. And many of the PSK
> QRP
> guys have gone to JT65 or JT9. I get why Elecraft did this, because PSK
> and
> RTTY have been around a long time, but why not add in some additional
> digital modes that would increase my QSO chances with portable QRP?)
>
> * Why do I need 10 watts with the KX2 or KX3, or SDR, or firmware
> updates? It's no longer QRP at 10 watts, and QRP is why I am out on the
> picnic bench with the end-fed and the rig in the first place. I won't have
> a tablet with me. The rig is the rig, it is simple and no need for
> updates.
>
> Use case #3 (and ONLY use case #3), QRP portable, I don't see why the KX2
> or
> KX3 is a better fit than the KX1 (or my MTR3B). Maybe KX2 or KX3 is better
> BECAUSE IT COVERS more than one use case, but I already have a rig in my
> shack with lots of nice features.
>
> If we consider the Field Day use case, THAT is where the KX2 or KX3 is THE
> RIG to have (filters, digital modes, antenna tuner). But that's not part
> of
> my use case #3, it is a special one-off scenario that has its own set of
> requirements and objectives that are DIFFERENT than the ones I listed
> above.
>
> Comments/critiques welcome. Did I make a sub-optimal decision with my
> MTR3B? Maybe I should get rid of all my other gear so I can get a KX2 or
> KX3 so I can do it all with one rig?
>
> Mark Lunday, WD4ELG
> Greensboro, NC FM06be
> wd4elg at arrl.net
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to lightdazzled at gmail.com
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list