[Elecraft] K3 Compression compared to CESSB

[Guy Olinger K2AV]

The method is proprietary.

I'm quite assured Wayne is reading up on CESSB. But I could hardly blame
him for not wanting to engage in an open discussion on a proprietary
process that is embedded in a proprietary SDR radio operating system. It's
called protecting one's commercial advantage.

There are very high tech and inventive reasons why Elecraft is so far ahead
at its relative low cost, contrary opines from boo birds and pathological
Elecraft detractors notwithstanding. And we think Wayne is obliged to
discuss these things in public because ???

I'm just as curious as the next guy. He might talk about it here but he
certainly is not obligated.

73, Guy K2AV

On Friday, January 22, 2016, Robert Sands <k7voradio at gmail.com> wrote:

> Given the recent article in QST explaining CESSB I looked for some detail
> about the compression algorithm of the K3 but found nothing explaining how
> it works.It is the most effective processing I have ever used and appears
> to double the transmit power. So perhaps it is a version of CESSB or
> efficient enough to be left alone as is. Perhaps I missed some discussion
> on this.Is there a published explanation of the compression algorithm? (not
> in Fred's book, I looked and checked with him)
> Bob
> K7VO
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net <javascript:;>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to k2av.guy at gmail.com <javascript:;>
>


-- 
Sent via Gmail Mobile on my iPhone