[Elecraft] Coax Cable Interconnections
Edward R Cole
kl7uw at acsalaska.net
Mon Feb 22 12:51:36 EST 2016
Jim and all:
Coax quality -- absolutely makes a difference.
I inherited some "previously driven" (aka used) coax from work
thinking to save money -ha! It dates from before I began working at
my last employer as comm tech else would never have been
purchased. I found in preparing for installing connectors the shield
density so poor one could not make good connections -- only useful
buried in ground as radial.
I ran into the coax shield quality issue in a different situation but
is the same isolation or "radiation" problem. When I increased power
from 600w to 1400w on 2m eme I suddenly started blowing preamps.
There were multiple "suspects": My TR relays were not rated for
1200w nor had the Rx port isolation needed. I try to keep RF into
the preamp < 0 dBm (1mw) and 1200w = +61 dBm. My relays were only
spec at 45-dB isolation. Also turned out only good to 800w. I
replaced all after melting down three of them!! Now using NARDA
sem123N rated 1200w & 80 dB isolation.
But to the point the high emf of being installed at the antenna
subjects connecting coax jumpers to high RF fields so shielding is
critical. I was using RG-58. I swapped for RG-142 double-shielded
coax. I also fed 12v to the preamp thru shielded power wiring (RG-6
or RG-58). Preamps has feedthru bypass caps so that path should not
as critical.
So changing three things means I do not know which was the "cure" but
no longer blow up preamps. Double-shielded coax is commonly used as
jumpers with repeater duplexers for the same reason cited by Jim.
I wonder if better coax jumper in the shack would improve isolation
from wifi type RFI? Probably couldn't hurt.
73, Ed - KL7UW
http://www.kl7uw.com
"Kits made by KL7UW"
Dubus Mag business:
dubususa at gmail.com
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list