[Elecraft] K3/K3S noise blanker performance greatly enhanced (at my QTH) -- need testers

[Guy Olinger K2AV]

Hi Bill. Does the same thing happen if you use the filters in the SubRX for
the experiment?  73, Guy K2AV

On Saturday, February 6, 2016, Bill W4ZV <btippett at alum.mit.edu> wrote:

> wayne burdick wrote
> > 2.8 kHz should give some improvement over a narrow filter on some types
> of
> > noise. Worth a try. Just temporarily tell the firmware that it's a little
> > bit wider than your narrow filter, then use the WIDTH control to switch
> > between narrow and wide. Re-optimize the NB settings each time.
>
> I've been having a problem with a pulse type electric fencer (not the 60 Hz
> cycling buzz type which is impossible to cure with a blanker).  Most
> radios'
> NBs deal effectively with pulses but for some reason (firmware change) my
> K3
> (#4717) is not.  I decided to try Wayne's suggestion even though I only
> have
> the 2.7 kHz stock filter.
>
> The problem with Wayne's suggestion is that the K3 Utility will not accept
> 0.45 as a valid width for the 2.7 kHz filter because it is used for TX on
> CW/SSB and bandwidths <2.7 kHz are not allowed.  Is there a workaround for
> this or am I doing something wrong?
>
> 73,  Bill  W4ZV
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3-K3S-noise-blanker-performance-greatly-enhanced-at-my-QTH-need-testers-tp7613491p7613631.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net <javascript:;>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to k2av.guy at gmail.com <javascript:;>
>


-- 
Sent via Gmail Mobile on my iPhone