[Elecraft] Velocity factor
Dauer, Edward
edauer at law.du.edu
Fri Dec 30 10:17:12 EST 2016
I wonder if the difference in opinions has to do not with right or wrong as a matter of physics but rather with the customary use of terminology. As I have understood it, the phrase “velocity factor” is ordinarily used in connection with transmission lines; AND it is the case that the velocity of a wave in any medium other than free space can differ – that is to say, it’s slower. Whether the technical term “velocity factor” covers it all I can’t say. Maybe in ordinary usage the generic term is “velocity of propagation” which in wires can vary from 0.7 to 0.99 C
Ted, KN1CBR
------------------------------
Message: 12
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 18:44:57 -0500
From: Don Wilhelm <donwilh at embarqmail.com>
To: Walter Underwood <wunder at wunderwood.org>, Elecraft Reflector
Reflector <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Small QRP antenna
Message-ID: <888b56e6-e2d3-5452-83aa-6bd9df16b658 at embarqmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Walt,
I differ, antenna wires do have a velocity factor to consider. I built
a 6 meter Moxon beam for my grandson out of insulated wire, and the
resonant frequency was considerably low. Stripping the insulation from
the wire brought its resonance point up to what was expected.
The only reason was because the velocity factor for the insulated wire
was less than that of non-insulated wire.
73,
Don W3FPR
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list