[Elecraft] OT: Some "No Code" background

[stan levandowski]

I'm very happy with Amateur Radio (or "ham radio" for those who prefer). 
 It might not be perfect, whatever that measure might be,  but it 
affords me the opportunity to participate in the world's greatest hobby 
in the manner I so choose.


Had our hobby not grown as it did, I wonder if Elecraft would have ever 
achieved the size, excellence and reputation is enjoys today?  Reading 
QST is sometimes beyond my ability to comprehend.  I'm no rocket 
scientist.  


Why should ham radio be "a place for those who have proven that they 
have the necessary skills to continue to practice  those "ancient" and 
no longer commercially viable skills"?  There are no commercially 
produced regenerative receivers and most modern transmitter don't have 
any tubes.


As far as Morse code is concerned, it's the only mode I choose to use - 
100%.  I also limit myself to HF and to QRP.  Those are my choices.


Similarly, there are many others who prefer to focus on just digital, or 
just VHF, or just.....you name it.


This hobby has room for real rocket scientists as well as slowpokes like 
me.

On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 06:51 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:

>
> Given that amateur radio in the US is now completely "no code" - there
> is no need to become proficient even for an Amateur Extra class 
> license
> - the early "no code" steps were a Faustian bargain just as the 
> fiction
> of "semi-automatic control" for digital operations was a Faustian
> bargain.
>
> As much as it pains me to say, we would arguably be better off with
> fewer licensees and maintaining a reasonable standard for entry. 
> There
> is no credible evidence that amateurs can continue to advance the 
> state
> of the art and evidence to the contrary that the current license base
> represents a trained pool of operators.  The quality of operators and
> the behavior heard on the air today is abhorrent when judged by the
> standards of 15 years ago.
>
> Perhaps it is time to review the basis and purpose behind amateur 
> radio
> and move to a "national park" model.  That is a place for those who
> have proven that they have the necessary skills to continue to 
> practice
> those "ancient" and no longer commercially viable skills.  Consider it
> the "primitive" areas of the National Parks
>
> 73,
>
>    ... Joe, W4TV
>
> On 8/1/2016 5:18 PM, Ken G Kopp wrote:
>> I got one of the 1st Novice licenses issued ... in September, 1951. 
>> Took
>> the exam in Oklahoma City, where the FCC came only once per year.  My
>> "Elmer" was a retired Navy CW op and I was taught well.  Long ago I 
>> was a
>> commercial shipboard RO on a NOAA vessel.
>>
>> I'm one of the six people who created the "no code" license.  In what 
>> I
>> consider one of the greatest honors in my Amateur Radio ... I 
>> -detest- the
>> name "ham" ... career the ARRL appointed me as one of the six members 
>> of
>> their No Code Study Committee.  BTW, each of us were / are die-hard 
>> CW
>> operators.
>>
>> We we --told-- by the FCC that we would be getting some form of 
>> codeless
>> licensing and we should come up with something that most could live 
>> with.
>> Lots of "details" were covered over a year and a half of meetings,
>> conference calls, etc.
>>
>> I still have a large box of pro and con correspondence in the attic. 
>> The
>> number of letters is about equally divided.
>>
>> An example of the results ... yesterday I had a KE0 proudly tell me 
>> he'd
>> just passed his "expert" license, and, his radio emitted a multi-tone 
>> CB
>> "roger beep" each time he unkeyed his microphone.
>>
>> Without the "no code" license we most likely wouldn't have Amateur 
>> Radio
>> with the record 750K licenses we have today, and there's political 
>> "safety
>> in numbers".
>>
>> Please, let's not start a thread on the subject.  I just thought some
>> "first person" input would be of interest.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Ken Kopp - K0PP
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to lists at subich.com
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to sjl219 at optonline.net
>