[Elecraft] Sherwood's receiver performance table updated

[Clay Autery]

Are you trying to be obtuse, or is it an accident.

I carry a smart phone, too.  For a manageable sized phone, the touch
screen is a necessity, and the crap on the screen STILL bugs the crap
out of me.

I do NOT however carry and HF-6M radio around in my pocket, so it does
NOT need a touch screen, and one isn't desired.

I never SAID there was a FLAW in the "concept".  The concept is fine, I
just don't like them... and I have LOTS of company.

You want a touch screen... cool, buy one....  but I wouldn't be your
IS/IT support...  I HIGHLY discourage the use of touch screens by my
clients... and charge a premium to those who INSIST on using them.

"That's why they have vanilla and chocolate ice cream."  -- Mamaw Autery
in response to a discussion about preferences on one thing or another.

______________________
Clay Autery, KG5LKV
MONTAC Enterprises
(318) 518-1389

On 4/26/2016 7:20 PM, Tony Estep wrote:
>> "25+ years....  Screens are not for touching..."
>
> Hmmmm. By one estimate, there were more than 2.5 billion smartphones in use
> last year (and more today, of course), all with touchscreens. If each
> screen is used just for a few minutes a day, the total usage-years is in
> the hundreds of millions.
>
> Touchscreen-equipped devices, including phones and tablets, are among the
> most widely-used consumer electronic devices of all time. If there is some
> undiscovered flaw in the concept of a touchscreen, it hasn't shown up so
> far.
>
> Tony KT0NY