[Elecraft] Analog vs. Digital Front Ends
Joe Subich, W4TV
lists at subich.com
Tue Sep 15 20:40:18 EDT 2015
> - According to the ARRL, the Flex 6700 has 14 dB worse preamp-off
> BDR than the K3.
>
> - If you turn the Flex's preamp ON, the BDR is probably 24 dB (or
> more) worse than the K3's. But if you turn the preamp on the 6700
> OFF, its 2-kHz IMDDR3 is 8 dB worse than the K3's. You can't win
Here are the comparisons I pulled from ARRL's reviews of the Flex-6700,
Flex-6300 (April 2015) and K3 (January 2009) and VA7OJ/AB4OJ's noise
power ratio testing (http://www.ab4oj.com/test/main.html#NPR):
ARRL Labs shows the *blocking dynamic range* of the Flex-6700 to be
much *worse* than the K3 at all spacings with the preamps off. I've
added the MDS for comparison. Note: ARRL tested the original K3 with
KSYN3 *not the new KSYN3A*.
(preamp off) 20 KHz 5 KHz 2 KHz MDS
Flex-6700 126 dB 126 dB 126 dB -119 dBm
Flex-6300 127 dB 127 dB 126 dB -119 dBm
K3 142 dB 140 dB 139 dB -130 dBm
(preamp on) 20 KHz MDS
Flex-6700 (+20) 130 dB -135 dBm
Flex-6300 127 dB -128 dBm
K3 (+10) 138 dB -138 dBm
IMDDR3 is difficult to compare since ARRL did not report 2 KHz IMDDR3 with
the preamp turned on. This means that the Flex MDS is more than 10 dB
worse
than the K3. Note that the Flex-6700 drops by nearly 9 dB at 20 KHz if
the preamp (+10 dB) is turned on.
IMDDR3 20 KHz/Off 20 KHz/On 5 KHz/Off 2 KHz/off
Flex-6700 103 dB 94 dB 103 dB 103 dB
Flex-6300 92 dB 89 dB 92 dB 92 dB
K3 106 dB 103 dB 105 dB 103 dB
Using a different test protocol (Noise Power Ratio), AB4OJ/VA7OJ reports:
Noise Power Ratio 160M 80M 60M 40M
Flex-6700 no preamp 71 dB 73 dB 75 dB 74 dB
Flex-6700 +20 dB 76 dB 71 dB 71 dB 70 dB
K3 no preamp 82 dB 82 dB 82 dB not measured
K3 Preamp On 83 dB 82 dB 80 dB not measured
Note: the Flex was tested with 10 to 15 less noise power signal than K3 to
prevent ADC clipping.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 9/15/2015 6:28 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> On Tue,9/15/2015 1:52 PM, Tony Estep wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Joe Subich, W4TV <lists at subich.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ....noise power ratio testing hides the fact by not providing MDS
>>> values under each test condition *and* fails to indicate that even
>>> with *no preamplifier* the total noise signal is more than 10 dB
>>> *less*...
>> =========
>> I take this to mean that the test results are not comparable across
>> radios, and the SDRs are 10db worse than they show up on the
>> comparison chart. If this is true, it ain't good.
>
> You've got the concept right -- the only difference is that 10 dB is not
> a "hard" number -- it could be anything from 5 to 30 dB, depending on
> how much test signal strength has been turned down, or preamp gain
> removed, to get the input of the digital system out of clip!
>
> Here are some comments by an engineer i trust.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
> = = = = =
>
> - According to the ARRL, the Flex 6700 has 14 dB worse preamp-off BDR
> than the K3.
>
> - If you turn the Flex's preamp ON, the BDR is probably 24 dB (or more)
> worse than the K3's. But if you turn the preamp on the 6700 OFF, its
> 2-kHz IMDDR3 is 8 dB worse than the K3's. You can't win
>
> This all stems from the poor NF of their ADC and its low input voltage
> range. The MDS of the Flex is only -118 dBm (according to Sherwood) with
> the preamp off. (A K3's MDS with preamp off is -134 dB.) So you have to
> turn the Flex's preamp ON to get good MDS. The 2-kHz IMDDR is then good,
> but the BDR is terrible. Sherwood was so baffled by the weird responses
> he saw that he simply put "A/D Limit" in the BDR column for the Flex.
> He's still thinking about how to test it.
>
> ARRL measured Flex's BDR, but only using the conventional method. To
> properly assess the damage caused by an ADC at the front end, you have
> to inject MANY signals into its input to give them a chance to combine
> in phase and hit the ADC's clipping threshold. And ADCs do NOT
> gracefully degrade.
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to lists at subich.com
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list