[Elecraft] 10 mHZ external reference VS the K3S's optionalKTCXO3-1
Gary
vk1zzgary at gmail.com
Mon Nov 2 17:04:04 EST 2015
Bob,
Thanks for asking, I too have struggled to understand the need given I only use the original digital mode, CW and SSB.
:-)
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <rmcgraw at blomand.net>
Sent: 3/11/2015 7:56 AM
To: "elecraft at mailman.qth.net" <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] 10 mHZ external reference VS the K3S's optionalKTCXO3-1
Yes, I've been following this as well. And to that end, I have a
commercial GPS Disciplined Oscillator that is used as a reference for
the test equipment in the shop. In checking my K3s I find, with the
optional TCXO, the accuracy is typically +/-2 Hz on all bands. Few if
many other transceivers will display or maintain this stand-a-lone
accuracy. So I ask, what's the obsession with accuracy better than this
for amateur use?
73
Bob, K4TAX
On 11/2/2015 2:34 PM, Doug Hensley wrote:
> I've been following the thread on using a 10 mHZ external reference and the prospect seems both affordable and at least initially fun BUT I'd like to ask is it really a practical improvement over Elecraft's available KTCXO3 internal 1ppm reference? Or is this just a way to achieve more accuracy at less cost than the KTCXO3 ? Isn't the K3S better served with its own oscillator? What am I missing here?
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to vk1zzgary at gmail.com
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list