[Elecraft] K3S and expectations
Doug Person via Elecraft
elecraft at mailman.qth.net
Sat May 16 11:43:47 EDT 2015
Can you define "Normal"? List members are not cribbing, whining or
complaining - they are expressing their legitimate reactions to a new
product announcement (comments Wayne and Eric probably WANT to hear).
The K3S vs: K3s discussion was purely tongue in cheek. No one was
serious about it. Here, we're all hams - a hobby based on chatting
about anything and everything. This list reflects that personality type.
The update from the K3 to the K3S makes perfect sense. I doubt it will
improve sales figures by any noticeable amount. Clearly, the update was
meant to keep the K3 looking fresh, add a couple of needed new features,
and to generate a little more market attention.
The discussion regarding a possible K4 is a completely legitimate one.
We (the list members) represent the most loyal and vocal segment of the
Elecraft customer base. What we say we want matters a lot. "We" have
had and will continue to have great influence on Elecraft product
planning. Just as it should be. It's one of the great aspects of
Elecraft as a company - they really listen.
I have no doubt that the K4 is either being actively considered or even
in development. The K3S isn't going to sustain the company. It will
extend the product life a little, perhaps. Five years from now? There
will need to be and undoubtedly will be several new flagship products.
Eagerness on our part is only natural. Speculation, ponderments,
what-ifs, throwing ideas around, even creating graphic renderings of a
potential product, all part of why we're here.
I enjoy the subtle humour of some of the threads. A chuckle here and
there is good for the soul.
Doug -- K0DXV
On 05/16/2015 08:42 AM, Jim Sheldon wrote:
> I don't usually chime in on these threads, but since everyone seems
> to be speculating on Elecraft's marketing strategy regarding the K3S,
> my take on the matter is they screwed up. From all the whinging and
> cribbing and whining about the fictional "K4" , Wayne and Eric should
> have just rounded the corners on the front and rear panels, ala the
> other manufacturers and called the K3S the K4. All the people
> complaining they'd rather have had a "new" rig called the K4 would be
> satisfied and the reflector could go back to normal without all the
> considerable garbage being generated by the grammar cops, the K3S(s),
> K4 cops and the rest of the stuff that just clutters up the reflector
> with mostly useless garbage.
>
> W0EB
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to k0dxv at aol.com
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list