[Elecraft] K3S vs. K3
David Cole
dave at nk7z.net
Sat May 16 09:52:56 EDT 2015
Hi,
I bought mine a year ago, and it is in the 8000 range.
--
Thanks and 73's,
For equipment, and software setups and reviews see:
www.nk7z.net
for MixW support see;
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/mixw/info
for Dopplergram information see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/dopplergram/info
for MM-SSTV see:
http://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/MM-SSTV/info
On Sat, 2015-05-16 at 03:09 -0700, AD6XY wrote:
> Too early I would say. To me it seems they have concentrated on improving the
> receiver phase noise, which is a very important figure, especially for SSB
> but the rest of the changes don't seem especially ground breaking. Maybe
> that's expected because there isn't so much wrong with the original K3. It
> means though that we won't all feel the need to upgrade our current K3 to
> S-class just yet.
>
> The man made noise levels at HF now mean that further receiver improvements
> are diminishing benefits- i.e. above a certain level, receiver performance
> is no longer the constraint and there is not a lot more a receiver could do,
> even if perfected.
>
> I would really like to see now is a K3v without all that unnecessary HF
> stuff in there. Something optimised VHF and up and only VHF and up.
>
> What surprised me was the serial number - 10000 and up. I thought they must
> have sold more than 10000 units already.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/K3S-vs-K3-tp7602970p7602971.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to dave at nk7z.net
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list