[Elecraft] Looking for a KPA500 Schematic
Wes (N7WS)
wes at triconet.org
Sat Mar 28 21:58:55 EDT 2015
I don't believe that there is a "misunderstanding" at all. The FCC rules state,
among other things:
§ 97.1 Basis and purpose.
The rules and regulations in this part are designed to provide an amateur radio
service having a fundamental purpose as expressed in
the following principles:
(a) Recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service to the
public as a voluntary noncommercial communication
service, particularly with respect to providing emergency communications.
(b) Continuation and extension of the amateur's proven ability to contribute to
the _advancement of the radio art._
(c) Encouragement and improvement of the amateur service through rules which
provide for advancing skills in both the communication
and _technical phases of the art._
(d) Expansion of the existing reservoir within the amateur radio service of
trained operators, _technicians, and electronics experts.__
_
How does all of this fit with having a failure and rather than troubleshooting
that failure first and possibly fixing it simply (i.e a cold solder joint),
boxing up the radio and shipping it off to the factory for repair, so as to
"avoid further damage?"
At the rate this hobby is going downhill I can envision the day when radios are
returned to the factory to get a blown fuse changed.
On 3/28/2015 5:37 PM, Scott Manthe wrote:
> Apparently there is some misunderstanding regarding my comment (Or people are
> responding without reading the entire message closely...). I was NOT
> responding to the original poster. I was responding to the second commenter,
> who said that he needed a schematic because his NEW KPA500 had failed. My
> point was that rather than risk further damaging a NEW, still under warranty
> KPA500, why not simply let Elecraft fix it. I'm not sure why it's
> "unbelievable" that I'd send my NEW amp to Elecraft for repair, but to each
> his or her own.
>
> I wasn't suggesting that no one needs a schematic, just that it probably
> wasn't the most necessary in that particular situation, where a piece of gear
> was NEW and under warranty. A supplied schematic would be nice, especially
> given that the skill level of the average Elecrafter might be somewhat higher
> than the average ham.
>
> 73,
> Scott, N9AA
>
>
> On 3/27/15 10:53 PM, Wes (N7WS) wrote:
>> Unbelievable.
>>
>> On 3/27/2015 10:40 AM, Scott Manthe wrote:
>>> Why would you want a schematic? If it's new, Elecraft will fix it free. I'm
>>> all for being able to troubleshoot my gear, but if I buy something new and
>>> it fails within the warranty period, I'm not going to waste my time trying
>>> to fix it, the manufacturer will.
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Scott, N9AA
>>>
>>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list