[Elecraft] P3 v SubRX
Randy Farmer
w8fn at tx.rr.com
Mon Mar 9 21:02:02 EDT 2015
I would agree that the P3 should probably take priority over the
Subreceiver for a new buy, mostly due to the many different things it
can do for you. But... my experience this weekend trying to work E30FB
on 20 CW sure made me glad I had the Sub. I would never have worked them
using just the scope.
Problem is, it seems the way people try to work DX these days makes it
virtually impossible to depend on a visual cue to know who's being
worked by the DX if there's a pileup of any size at all. E30FB had the
pile spread out for better than 20 kHz, and the scope showed a constant
morass of signals all across the entire span. Aside from the obliviots
who continually send their call whether the DX is listening or not,
there are many who apparently see nothing wrong with coming back or
continuing to call when the DX operator replies to a call that obviously
isn't theirs. Every time E30FB would answer a complete call there were
dozens of perfectly timed signals that jumped up all across the extent
of the pileup. Luckily, using the second receiver I managed to stumble
on to one that turned out to actually be the guy he was working. A
minute or two of careful listening around that frequency revealed the
operator's tuning pattern, and after just a couple of calls I was in the
log too.
If you really want to work rare DX these days you're going to NEED the
second receiver. This isn't due to any problems with the capabilities of
the P3 -- it's the result of operating practices that continue to
deteriorate. You'll need all the tools you can get and all the cunning
you can muster to work DX through the Doofus curtain these days.
73...
Randy, W8FN
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list