[Elecraft] K3: Upgrade or replace

[Scott Manthe]

Aside from the new RF board, which includes a couple of extra attenuator 
steps and a lower noise floor, many of the critical K3S upgrades are 
available for the K3. To acquire a K3S that is configured similarly to 
my K3, I'd have to spend almost $4600, and to do all that currently 
available upgrades, I will have about $3600 in my K3. This leaves $1000 
difference. We'll see how much the KIO3B and DSP boards cost, but to me, 
I'm not sure I can justify the cost difference for a couple of 
attenuator steps, a slightly better noise floor, and a nice bezel, 
especially since I'll lose a few bucks if I try to sell my K3.

In fact, I'd like to see an upgraded "K3" marked black bezel for current 
K3 owners. Its does look nice, and would look nicer with black screws...

73,
Scott N9AA



On 7/10/15 9:07 AM, Bill wrote:
> After reading all the posts about the improvements that can be made 
> now (and in the near future) to the K3, I find it difficult to decide 
> between a new K3S or to add the upgrades as they become available. I 
> have not set a list of improvement vs. costs to pen and paper yet ($$$$).
>
> I am not a DXer or contester - merely a rag chewer on 75 and 40. I am 
> fortunate, as my ambient noise lever here is well under 1 S unit. I 
> use external Behringer amplified speakers and have made many 
> adjustments to the EQ and other settings.
>
> The K3 is by far the best receiver I have used in over 55 years of 
> being on the air. I have to wonder what I will gain with a new K3S, 
> making the upgrades to the K3 as they become available, or just 
> continue as I am. Money is not the object, but I don't spend if there 
> is nothing to be gained.
>
> I am thinking I am not alone in making this decision, although other 
> ham's use and circumstances may differ.
>
> Bill W2BLC K-Line
>