[Elecraft] 8 or5 Pole cw filters
Johnny Siu
vr2xmc at yahoo.com.hk
Wed Jan 14 01:08:51 EST 2015
Hello Gentleman,
I am not a CW op. To my knowledge, 8 pole will give more passive IMD and lower NPR (see page 6 of the report below by AB4OJ):
http://www.ab4oj.com/test/docs/npr_test.pdf
73
Johnny VR2XMC
寄件人︰ Brian Hunt <huntinhmb at coastside.net>
收件人︰ "<elecraft at mailman.qth.net>" <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
傳送日期︰ 2015年01月14日 (週三) 12:27 PM
主題︰ Re: [Elecraft] 8 or5 Pole cw filters
Remember that these are roofing filters and what they do is keep strong adjacent signals out of the DSP and AGC. The final selectivity is set by the DSP WIDTH control. As you ratchet down the WIDTH the appropriate roofing filter is switched in automagically.
That said, when I bought my K3 I added a single 400 Hz 8 pole thinking that I could add others later. That was 4 years ago.
I've been trying to decide between a 700 Hz and 1 KHz filter for a while. Turns out that on CW the NR is more effective at those BWs and 2.7 KHz is too wide a door to leave open when chasing weak signals.
I'm a 95% CW op, contester and DX chaser.
HTH & 73,
Brian, K0DTJ
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
Message delivered to vr2xmc at yahoo.com.hk
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list