[Elecraft] Selling Synths
Dauer, Edward
edauer at law.du.edu
Wed Feb 25 10:20:28 EST 2015
Not necessarily. The old radio had the old synth, which cost something.
The new radios have the new synth, which also cost something. If the two
somethings are the same, the total costs of the old and new would be the
same. But selling the new synth all by itself would still require
charging something. That something would include amortization of
development costs. So the new radios with the new synth could cost more,
less, or the same, depending on the relative costs of the old and new
components.
Ted. KN1CBR
>>>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 14
>Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 12:47:13 +1000
>From: Gary Gregory <vk1zzgary at gmail.com>
>To: Rick Bates <happymoosephoto at gmail.com>
>Cc: Elecraft List <elecraft at mailman.qth.net>, Stan Gibbs KR7C
> <stan at kr7c.net>
>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Old KSYN3 cards
>Message-ID:
> <CA+MFBaFx77qZ-0xxKs5Z=bSH59-txQXbBJjqP_31ceywpKLv8g at mail.gmail.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
>Hmmmm....if a new board is $200 as a standalone upgrade item, one might
>assume it would increase the cost of a new k3 by at least a smaller margin
>to help defray design costs.
>If not then one could ponder if these other factors are simply applied to
>boards sold separately.
>Just curious.
>
>I wont be upgrading just yet....first job is to get my K3 to work as
>designed. Being an older serial number it has "issues" and a return trip
>to
>the factory is over $850.00 AUD sadly, so for now it is accumulating dust
>and age.
>
>Gary
>Vk1ZZ
>K3, KX3, KPA500-FT, KAT500-FT,P3.
>On 25/02/2015 12:37 PM, "Rick Bates" <happymoosephoto at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list