[Elecraft] K3 Programmable Split?
Ian White
gm3sek at ifwtech.co.uk
Thu Feb 19 20:02:54 EST 2015
W4TV wrote:
>If you want to talk
>about a new feature set for a new model with a different UI, that's
>fine but don't mess with Split
"Don't mess with Split" is not your call to make, Joe.
> even the current basic implementation
>is obviously a problem. Overload the control or [optionally] change
>the basic behavior of that control and you are going to cause real
>confusion.
At last, something we can agree about: "the current basic implementation
is obviously a problem".
The problem is that the current implementation of Split is *too* basic.
It cannot handle the routine task of preparing the K3 for pileup
operation without significant risk of human error. Hence the request for
a 'smarter' alternative that also includes the vital step of moving
VFOB away from the frequency of the DX station.
I am totally confident that Elecraft can handle the implications of
offering two alternative behaviors for the [SPLIT] button, given that
Yaesu and Icom have long been able to offer two alternatives or even
three. I am also confident that Elecraft users are at least as competent
as Yaesu and Icom users.
Let's keep this in perspective: this is a straightforward feature
request for an option that already has a proven 20-year track record.
Since it would only be an option, every K3 user would still be free to
make their own individual choice.
Given all that, I see no reason for just *one* individual to have
responded in such a wildly exaggerated manner. "A K3 that has been
perverted with Quick Split"... wherever is *that* coming from?
73 from Ian GM3SEK
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list