[Elecraft] A way to show both "SPLIT" and "NON-SPLIT" warnings
Wayne Burdick
n6kr at elecraft.com
Wed Feb 18 12:14:06 EST 2015
Well stated, Gary. But those who don't have a P3 could still benefit from a more overt split/non-split indication on the K3 itself. I'm going to try the method I proposed.
Wayne
N6KR
On Feb 18, 2015, at 8:39 AM, Gary Smith <Gary at ka1j.com> wrote:
> It is the operator of the radio who must be in control of his
> transmitter. When I go to a split operation I always set the K3 to do
> that and I'm good to go.
>
> However what happens is I rarely make the Q right away and I I'll
> click on another spot I need to see how that is coming in and with my
> software, if there is a split frequency entered, the K3 will be put
> in split as well (All is good). But, when going back to the first
> frequency, unless I manually work the band switch to QSY to where I
> first set up the split, clicking on a spot in the spot log will get
> me there but if SPLIT wasn't in that info, I'll be back but not in
> SPLIT. When I transmit I'll be dead on the DX.
>
> If I had clicked on a spot on the same band, I may or may not have
> had a SPLIT entered based on the info the spotter had left. So if
> there was no SPLIT, then QSYing back to the first frequency, I'd
> again have no SPLIT.
>
> The problem being that I had set up a split the first time but later
> left the frequency and going back to it, I have to check to see if
> I'm still in split. Yes, the responsibility is mine to do so but it's
> easy to be curious about other possible Qs and then having your
> original settings be undone without you thinking about it.
>
> I suspect some version of that scenario happens to most people. For
> me, seeing the words in color on the P3 would be an in your face
> reminder you are in split or not. I'd love to be able to select that
> option, others may not want to but it would save my can, you betcha.
>
> 73,
>
> Gary KA1J
>>
>>> Implicit in your statement, is the assumption that the provided
>>> indicators are sufficient, which all of this traffic would seem to
>>> indicate is not the case.
>>
>> Implicit in your statement is that the transceiver, automobile, roadway
>> or whatever should make it impossible for the operator to have an
>> accident. That's not possible - there are those who can break an
>> anvil.
>>
>> The current design that *THREE* separate indications of split operation.
>> Any *one* of those should be sufficient. *NONE* of the proposals do
>> anything to address the real question which should be how to notify the
>> operator that he *should be in split*.
>>
>> The problem is that the operator *is not paying attention*. The
>> correct approach would be: every time the operator activates transmit,
>> the rig display should show a message that says "you are in transceive
>> (simplex) - are you sure you should not engage split? Press XMIT to
>> begin transmitting"
>>
>> 73,
>>
>> ... Joe, W4TV
>>
>>
>> On 2015-02-18 10:40 AM, David Cole wrote:
>>> Dave (AB9CA),
>>>
>>> Given your logic, we should get rid of all street signs, and stop
>>> lights, and guard rails on bridges, and roads, because the drivers are
>>> just initiative, and the crutch o guard rails is not needed for them.
>>>
>>> Implicit in your statement, is the assumption that the provided
>>> indicators are sufficient, which all of this traffic would seem to
>>> indicate is not the case.
>>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Elecraft mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>> Message delivered to gary at ka1j.com
>>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to n6kr at elecraft.com
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list