[Elecraft] P3TXMON question?
Bob McGraw - K4TAX
rmcgraw at blomand.net
Sun Aug 23 17:14:27 EDT 2015
Thank you. I stand corrected on the point. Not physically having it
in front of me, I was recalling another power meter I use more
frequently. It is expanded up scale and compressed down scale.
73
Bob, K4TAX
K3S s/n 10,163
On 8/23/2015 3:36 PM, Ken G Kopp wrote:
> Bob,
>
> The scale calibration --is-- compressed to the right of center,
> --not-- to the left as you state, making the left portion expanded
> and easier to read.
>
> 73!
>
> Ken - K0PP
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX
> <rmcgraw at blomand.net <mailto:rmcgraw at blomand.net>> wrote:
>
>
> This seems to have things really screwed up. Yes, the Bird 43 is
> a 5% of F.S. accuracy instrument. The Bird 43P is somewhat less
> accurate, although 5% F S with carrier, and more like 8% F S or so
> in peak mode. In measuring a 100 watt radio with a 100 watt F S
> slug would seem to be most accurate. Total accuracy decreases
> as the indicated value approaches the left side of the scale.
> Now using a 250 watt slug to measure a 100 watt radio, the
> earlier states that most accuracy is to the left of center, which
> by the way, is the compressed side of the scale. This makes no
> sense as the scale markings are much more difficult to
> approximate. In fact the most accurate area is to the right of
> center toward full scale is the expanded scale which is where the
> highest accuracy actually occurs. With a 100 watt radio and a
> 100 watt F S slug the error is +/- 5 watts at 100 watts. Using a
> 250 watt element and measuring 100 watts near center scale the
> error is more like +/- 12.5 watts or 5% of the F S value.
>
> If one measures the same power source with identical elements and
> gets different results, they should refrain from buying ham fest
> elements for indeed the elements are not identical. To wit, I
> purchased 3 new 100 watt elements and 3 new 2500 watt elements.
> They all give identical results +/- the width of the pointer. I
> don't buy ham fest Bird elements as I find they are junk and not
> worth the brass they contain.
>
> And remember, Bird 43 instruments are calibrated for only a 50
> resistive load. Any other load being used leaves one with a "best
> guess" situation as to actual power.
>
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
> K3S s/n 10,163
>
> On 8/21/2015 11:48 PM, Wes (N7WS) wrote:
>
> So by your "logic" it would be best to measure one Watt using
> a 100W element.
>
> On 8/21/2015 8:03 PM, Ken G Kopp wrote:
>
> Bird accuracy is specified to be +/- 5% of meter full
> scale ... a 100W
> element would be a poor choice to measure a 100W output
> level. Take a look
> at any Bird's meter scale. It's not linear and can be
> read with the most
> accuracy to the left of center scale. A 250W element is
> much better for
> measuring 100W.
>
> Wanna chase your tail? Measure the same power source with
> identical Bird
> elements......
>
> Don's method is better, but all methods are obviously
> subject to the
> accuracy of the final indicating instrument.
>
> FWIW .....
>
> 73l
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> <mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list:
> http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to rmcgraw at blomand.net
> <mailto:rmcgraw at blomand.net>
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> <mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net>
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to kengkopp at gmail.com <mailto:kengkopp at gmail.com>
>
>
More information about the Elecraft
mailing list