[Elecraft] Rig Insurance

dyarnes w7aqk at cox.net
Sun Aug 9 01:00:04 EDT 2015


Hi All,

Ted, KN1CBR, makes some very good points about the complexities of coverage. 
I don't know about the rest of you, but my head spins when I try to decipher 
what my homeowner's policy will cover vs. what it will not cover!  The lower 
deductible with ARRL insurance is definitely an attractive feature. 
However, you probably need to evaluate just what "risks" are really 
relevant, and compare that to the added cost.

Rightly or wrongly, I've always tended to view the ARRL insurance program as 
protection that is best suited against total loss, such as fire or theft, 
and then considered just how much risk I actually have of that occurring. 
Then you have to correlate that to whatever protection you might have from 
your own homeowner's policy.  Insuring simply against damage may, or may 
not, actually make a lot of sense since the repair bill might not actually 
exceed your deductible plus the premium payments you have made over time. 
It's a crap shoot!

Then you have to consider what all you are actually going to include in your 
coverage--you probably don't want to insure everything--just significant 
items.  In so doing, however, you now are paying a premium on multiple items 
while the risk of loss may well be only for one item (but you don't 
necessarily know which one!), and so you are paying not just $1.50/hundred, 
but a multiple of that--in effect!  Maybe that doesn't make a lot of sense, 
but it sort of does to me.  Stated differently, assume you are insuring five 
$1,000 items and paying a premium accordingly.  Are all 5 items equally at 
risk simultaneously?  Maybe yes, but probably not.  Still, you are paying a 
premium for 5 items when, at any point in time, maybe only one of those 
items may be truly at risk--whatever that might be.  This may seem like an 
over-complication, but I certainly think that is, at least in part, how your 
insurance company views things when they set the premiums!  Their objective 
is to absolutely make money on covering you.  Unfortunately, the only way 
you may know for sure that your arrangement has been a "good deal" for you 
is if they cancel you because they aren't making money!  I had a claim, 
about 20 years ago, on a satellite receiver that got "toasted" by a 
lightning strike.  My insurance company didn't cancel me afterwards, but 
they did force me to "up" my deductible!  If they don't get you coming, they 
will get you going!

Insurance is a "must have", particularly for the significant risks we are 
all exposed to, but I'm still somewhat cynical about the way insurance 
companies run their business.  You pay a premium supposedly based on a "pool 
of risks", but if you become a claimant, the thrust of the backlash will 
most probably be more against you rather than the "pool".  Never mind that 
your loss may simply have been a case of the law of averages!

Clearly we all should evaluate our homeowner's policies to see what coverage 
we have, or don't have.  If the coverage isn't very good, then the ARRL 
insurance probably makes a lot of sense.  It would be nice if we had some 
insurance "gurus" who could maybe enlighten all of us about this aspect! 
I'm not exactly sure about my own coverage, but this thread has started me 
thinking about looking into that--if I can just get my agent to stand still 
for a few minutes to explain it to me!  Hi.  I do know this--whenever I've 
been moved to get some sort of explanation about coverage, I often am 
disappointed in the response!!!!  There always seems to be more in the way 
of exceptions, limitations, and exclusions than there is in actual coverage.

Self insuring isn't a bad alternative, although it probably wouldn't be 
sufficient against major risks.  If we had the discipline to put that 
premium money away in a savings account, we very well might be better off as 
to any of the more common risks.  The problem is, most of us don't have that 
sort of discipline, and want the peace of mind of protection against a 
sudden significant cost outlay.  For example, I'm "guilty" of this with 
respect to one of these home warranty plans.  For many years I've been a 
slot machine for the insurance company, and I pay a fairly high deductible 
for any repair visits--probably enough to cover most of the service call!  I 
even got a new refrigerator out of it some years back, but the premiums I 
have paid cover that cost many times over.  Still, I keep doing it, mainly 
out of concern that one of my A/C units might blow up!  It's hard to argue 
against the peace of mind thing, so you pay your money and take your choice!

Dave W7AQK




More information about the Elecraft mailing list