[Elecraft] I wonder how many folks have had buyers remorse on a K3/K3S purchase?

Chester Alderman aldermant at windstream.net
Tue Aug 4 10:14:18 EDT 2015


Well COP, my response to Marc's post about his opinion about the K3. Maybe a
tad of 'mind your own business' would help you relax?

Tom - W4BQF


-----Original Message-----
From: KQ8M [mailto:kq8m at kq8m.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2015 9:45 AM
To: 'Chester Alderman'; 'Marc Veeneman'; 'David F. Reed'
Cc: 'elecraft Reflector'
Subject: RE: [Elecraft] I wonder how many folks have had buyers remorse on a
K3/K3S purchase?

What does this have to do with the subject? Start your own thread!

73,
Tim Herrick, KQ8M
kq8m at kq8m.com

AR-Cluster V6 kq8m.homedns.org
User Ports: 23, 7373  with local skimmer, 7374 without local skimmer Server
Ports: V6 3607, V4 Active 3605, V4 Passive 3606


-----Original Message-----
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of
Chester Alderman
Sent: Tuesday, August 04, 2015 9:05 AM
To: 'Marc Veeneman'; 'David F. Reed'
Cc: 'elecraft Reflector'
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] I wonder how many folks have had buyers remorse on a
K3/K3S purchase?

Marc,

In my opinion, you have no one to blame except yourself. I doubt seriously
the K3 keying program in the K3 Utility was designed, not only to be used on
the air, but certainly not for QRQ operating. I have been a QRQ operator for
about 40 years, running speeds from about 60 wpm up to around 125 wpm. I can
tell you from experience that NOW the K3 will key and maintain full QSK up
about 95 wpm with both weight and spacing held constant. But, in my opinion,
you MUST have an external PC program capable of sending at speeds in excess
of 50 wpm while maintaining weight and character spacing. That I am aware,
everyone who operates QRQ has a PC on their desk, but there are very few
programs available that will do it correctly. N1MM Logger Plus is a contest
program, but it's keying program will run my K3 at 95 wpm and do it well.
The only other program that I have used is named YPlog, written by VE6YP but
unfortunately not supported for over 15 years. YPlog generates CW using
Windows internal audio generation, primarily to eliminate the normal
'stutter' by PC I/O ports. High speed CW requires correctly spaced and
correctly weighted generation of CW and there is no one, that I know of, who
can do that by hand, so a PC is imperative.

I, also, have spent the past 40 years working with computers and just
consider them as another tool to be used as I see fit. Not wanting to use a
PC anymore, in my opinion, basically eliminates you from getting into one of
the most fun parts of our hobby, QRQ!
Your choice BUT putting the blame on the K3 and the K3 Utility shows you
really mistook the purpose of the K3 Utility.

If you are interested I can send you the YPlog program, but you will have to
build an audio full wave bridge plus a keying transistor to key your K3 at
speeds.

73,
Tom - W4BQF


-----Original Message-----
From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Marc
Veeneman
Sent: Monday, August 3, 2015 5:23 PM
To: David F. Reed
Cc: elecraft Reflector
Subject: Re: [Elecraft] I wonder how many folks have had buyers remorse on a
K3/K3S purchase?

Maybe I can offer a counterpoint, I do regret my K3 purchase.  But I will
not be selling it.

That was the summary.  Here, at great length, is the detail:

I had a KX3 with KXPA100 and liked it very much.  I'm a CW operator and hope
to join the QRQ gang some day soon.   But I spent the past 40 years working
with computers and I don't want one in my shack.  I prefer to have minimal
equipment at the operating desk.  With that in mind, I saw the pictures of
the PX3 with the word Keyboard stenciled over a USB socket.  I ordered the
PX3 and separately order a folding wireless keyboard to match.  

The PX3 arrived and it changed my operating for the better.  Seeing the
entire band instead of slowly tuning for CW signals adds a whole new
dimension to my hobby.  

But the Keyboard USB socket was useless and the sort-of-promise that the
keyboard option would be ready by Christmas went sort-of-unfulfilled.

Meanwhile, the K3/P3/SVGA combo has a keyboard option and my CW speed is
increasing so I ordered the K3 combo.  It cost a lot more than the KX3 had.
As soon as the gear arrived I set it up with my yet-unused wireless keyboard
and commenced to play with it.  Trouble.  Letters, and sometimes whole words
went missing.  CTRL-S has to be hit every so often to force a buffer dump.
And sporadically there are pauses of several seconds when sending just stops
and CTRL-S fails.  However, the buffer dump might resume on its own.  

My phone call to Elecraft gave me bad news.  My wireless keyboard was not
approved by Elecraft so there would be no support for it.
I ordered a USB keyboard, waited for its arrival, and discovered no
difference.  I still had all the same problems with the wired, approved
keyboard.  Then more bad news from Elecraft: operating the keyboard without
a VGA monitor is not approved.
If you recall, I wanted minimal equipment in the shack; in fact that's why I
wanted the keyboard option instead of the KX3 (now K3) Utility program for
sending CW.  Now I learned that I have to have a screen on the desk as well.


I purchased a VGA monitor and tried again.  Still all the same issues.  

So Elecraft asked that I send the P3 with keyboard to them to find out what
might be wrong.  I did so.  After the normal UPS transit time, 5 days each
way, and a sufficient time for Elecraft experts to examine the P3, they
declared it perfect and could not explain any of my problems.  (I pointed
out that the problems worsen as typing speed increases above 50 wpm; they
said "not so".)  

They did admit that there is a sporadic delay of several seconds
periodically.  But that is normal with the K3/P3/SVGA keyboard option.
(Huh?)  

No charge for the "no problem found" service by Elecraft.  But now I have a
K3/P3/SVGA combo that does not do the one thing I bought it to do.  And I
have a 21" (smallest I could find) VGA screen to sell at the next ham swap
meet.  It's stuffed away in a closet.

Meanwhile my KXPA100 stopped working (second time in a year) and my regular
CW skeds need all 100 watts almost every day.  The
K3/100 never has a hiccup and the P3 offers some, but not all, of the PX3
benefits.  

So, yes I have buyer's remorse.   But the K3/P3, like it's KX3/PX3 cousin,
is the finest rig I've ever used.  So I continue to use it daily.

The good news is that my CW skills are still below 50 wpm so my real need
for a keyboard is still a future event.

Sorry for such a long story, but I suspect some of you can sympathize.
-- 
Marc   W8SDG  


> On Aug 3, 2015, at 3:21 PM, David F. Reed <w5sv.dave at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> a counterpoint; I used to have an IC-7800; great rig... I bought a K3 
> as a second rig... started using it and to my surprise, it was 
> superior in a few ways
> 
> Since then I have added a KX3 and after using it a while, sold one of 
> the K3; it is just hard to beat a K3, and the KX3 is a close second
______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to aldermant at windstream.net

______________________________________________________________
Elecraft mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html Message
delivered to kq8m at kq8m.com




More information about the Elecraft mailing list