[Elecraft] comparisons of K3 control software

[Doug Ellmore]

It captures the k3/kx3 capture perfectly.  I also run cwskimmer to decode
from the IF. Skimmer is the best decoder.

Doug NA1DX
On Apr 11, 2015 9:58 AM, "Chester Alderman" <aldermant at windstream.net>
wrote:

> And how well does it produce CW?  Also can you explain the advantage of
> using a computer to operate a radio verses using the radio manually?
>
> Thanks and 73,
> Tom - W4BQF
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elecraft [mailto:elecraft-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Doug
> Ellmore
> Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2015 9:29 AM
> To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> Subject: Re: [Elecraft] comparisons of K3 control software
>
> I and many of my k3/kx3 cohorts in out area use Win4K.  It's second to
> none.
> It is not focused on logging but stable fast radio operating.
>
> It can be used as a simple application or integrated with contest software
> like n1mm+, hrdlogger, cwskimmer, etc.
>
> The manual is extensive.
>
> Doug NA1DX
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message
> delivered to aldermant at windstream.net
>
>