[Elecraft] ESSB

[David Ahrendts]

Yes, KHz, of course. Didn’t have the courage to consume 4KHz :—) but I did answer the Elecraft net call at 1800z at 3KHz. 

> On Nov 17, 2014, at 10:29 AM, Phil Wheeler <w7ox at socal.rr.com> wrote:
> 
> I think you meant KHz, not MHz, David :-)
> 
> My thinking is that the narrower "communications quality" signal would be more effective.
> 
> How did you find 4KHz with none of those contesters on it? Incredible accomplishment!
> 
> 73, Phil W7OX
> 
> On 11/17/14 10:22 AM, David Ahrendts wrote:
>> Experimented yesterday for a few minutes with ESSB (carefully avoiding weekend contesters), and it raised a fundamental question: As bandwidth is broadened, is effective radiated power diluted? In other words, will 500 watts with a 2.6MHz signal be more effective (stronger, punchier, more DBs transmitted) than 500 watts with a 4MHz ESSB signal?
>> 
>> David Ahrendts, KC0XT
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> David Ahrendts   davidahrendts at me.com
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to davidahrendts at me.com




David Ahrendts   davidahrendts at me.com