[Elecraft] The case for a Panadapter - opinions, please?

[Jim Bennett]

Jim,

I had my K3 for about two years before I got the P3. Now, I would not be without it. When chasing DX I can see where the other stations are and either jump on the frequency of the last guy worked, or find a "hole" in the pileup where I can plunk down my signal. I also do the QRP "fox hunts" - same deal there - finding a spot to call the fox makes the P3 invaluable. I sometimes work contests, in my attempt to get 5BWAS. The P3 lets me see where activity is.

I recently got a KX3. Not having the P3 panadapter was like walking around blind. Sure, that's the way everyone operated in the past, but then again, why not use the technology available? So, I got some software and hooked my KX3 up to a free program called NaP3 and I now have a 27" pan view of the band.

If you get a P3 - you will NOT want to be without it!!! :-)

Jim / W6JHB


On   Friday, Feb 28, 2014, at  Friday, 10:08 AM, Jim Lowman wrote:

> I'm basically a S&P operator, especially in contests.  I've found that calling CQ is something of a waste of valuable time.
> 
> When I see options like the Panadapter, or bandscopes from other manufacturers, I get the metaphor of fishing in a stocked pond.
> 
> So, for those of you who have this option, could you describe how it has assisted you?
> In another message, someone mentioned that weak stations outside of the passband could be missed, which is a good point.
> 
> BTW, I'm not opposed to giving the good folks at Elecraft more of my $$$ if this is a good idea.
> 
> Thanks in advance and 73 de Jim - AD6CW
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html