[Elecraft] Is there a reason the receive is so Skinny

Joe Subich, W4TV lists at subich.com
Sun Apr 27 23:22:14 EDT 2014


Cutting the bandwidth of the audio going into the modulator is
indistinguishable from narrowing the bandwidth after the modulator.
If you don't believe that run a 1/3 octave EQ (so you have finer
control) between the mic and the input of the K3.

Of course, you can always install an INRAD 2.1 KHz filter in the
K3 and tell the rig it is a 2.7 KHz filter ... that should give
you a tight 400-2600 Hz response.

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 4/27/2014 10:07 PM, XE3/K5ENS via Elecraft wrote:
>
> Joe,
>
> You of all people should know it's not the same as actually narrowing the
> IF.
> You should try both and compare.
>
> Keith
>
>
>
>
>
> If you use K9YC's suggested EQ you will be very close to 2.3/2.4 KHz
> audio - particularly if 400 and 3200 are set to -16 dB.  Try it ...
>
> 73,
>
>      ... Joe, W4TV
>
>
> On 4/27/2014 7:41 PM, XE3/K5ENS via Elecraft wrote:
>
>>
>> I've been asking for the ability to narrow the transmit bandwidth on the
>> K3
>> for years.  That would make a better contest radio.
>> But alas all I hear is it's on the list.
>>
>> Keith
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://elecraft.365791.n2.nabble.com/Is-there-a-reason-the-receive-is-so-Skinny-tp7587977p7588036.html
> Sent from the Elecraft mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Elecraft mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/elecraft
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> Message delivered to lists at subich.com
>


More information about the Elecraft mailing list