[Elecraft] Re Subjects Fit for The Discussion Threads . . . and the QRQ Problem

[Dauer, Edward]

There is a point at which a discussion thread goes on too long, but that
was not the case for the QRQ issue - at least not for me.  And that
qualifier is important, I submit.  I have been an Elecraft owner for only
about three years, and have been following the reflector for, I would
guess, around one.  I don¹t recall having seen the QRQ/shift-split issue
taken up before, and as a 100% CW op operating at the cusp of the
phenomenon (about 30-35 wpm), I was interested in every one of the
questions and answers everyone sent in.  My point is, the fact that an
issue has been explored before doesn¹t make it useless to take it up again
for the benefit of those who hadn¹t been in on it before (yes, I know
there¹s an archive somewhere) ‹ so long, that is, that the contributions
continue to be substantive contributions.  I for one am grateful for
almost everything I¹ve read here, on this subject and almost every other.
TNX to all . . . 

Ted, KN1CBR
(K3-P3-KAT500-KPA500-KX3 and PX3 on order.)


--------------------------
>
>Message: 18
>Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 11:17:37 -0700
>From: "Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT" <KX3 at ColdRocksHotBrooms.com>
>To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Side Effects of QRQ On The K3
>Message-ID: <534AD4C1.5030108 at ColdRocksHotBrooms.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>It's a total non-issue to me.  I just wish the discussion was a tiny bit
>more civil.
>
>73 -- Lynn
>
>On 4/13/2014 9:48 AM, KQ8M wrote:
>> Am I led to believe, then, that because you and Toby don't like the
>>subject that it shouldn't be discussed.
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 19
>Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2014 11:23:11 -0700
>From: Phil Wheeler <w7ox at socal.rr.com>
>To: elecraft at mailman.qth.net
>Subject: Re: [Elecraft] Side Effects of QRQ On The K3
>Message-ID: <534AD60F.9070709 at socal.rr.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
>Or given Wayne's "We intend to improve this in a
>future firmware release." message of this morning,
>maybe the discussion will just end.
>
>73, Phil W7OX
>
>On 4/13/14, 11:17 AM, Lynn W. Taylor, WB6UUT wrote:
>> It's a total non-issue to me.  I just wish the
>> discussion was a tiny bit more civil.
>>
>> 73 -- Lynn
>>
>> On 4/13/2014 9:48 AM, KQ8M wrote:
>>> Am I led to believe, then, that because you and
>>> Toby don't like the subject that it shouldn't
>>> be discussed.
>
>
>